The GOP has taken the immigration issue to heart and appears to be ready to knuckle under to the pressure imposed by the Democrats and their allies in the Media. Initially, the Senate proposal on immigration reform was to be shaped by two major conditions. First, that border security is a necessary precursor to everything else. Secondly, that the reform is not a blanket amnesty but conditional with a waiting line and some fines or fees to be paid up front. But as we saw last week when the actual voting and debating began, those ideas are out the window.

Marco Rubio seems to be trying to play both sides of the issue, telling one group that border security must happen first while telling another group, the Hispanic community, that it is not a precondition. An amendment to the bill offered by Charles Grassley (R-IA) to require a six month review once border security is implemented before beginning to accept any illegal immigrants on a ′pathway to citizenship′ was voted down. Now comes word that House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) is ready to deal and accept whatever bill the Senate passes. Maybe he changed his mind after getting a case of tequila?

So there it is, boys and girls. Jeb Bush thinks immigrants are more fertile and hopes his support on immigration reform will win him the White House in 2016. Sarah Palin, being fertile herself, thinks he is all wet. Speaking of wet, John ′Rummy′ Boehner is ready to sell out the Republican Party, again, and allow for a blanket amnesty bill to pass, even if the Senate drops border security as a precondition. Meanwhile, 30 million Mexicans are getting ready to storm across the border as soon as Obama signs whatever Congress winds up passing. Just another day in Disneyland on the Potomac!

Another ′trustworthy′ voice, Susan Rice, is also behind the claim that Syria used chemical weapons in at least two attacks in the northern city of Aleppo. Yet, at best, only between 100 to 150 people are alleged to have been killed by Syrian chemical weapons. This makes no sense at all. Chemical weapons, be they Sarin, VX or even old fashioned mustard gas, are ′area weapons′, meant to cover a large piece of ground. Furthermore, such weapons are known as binary weapons, meaning that for storage safety, each artillery shell or bomb has two separate, internal vessels, each containing only a portion of the chemicals. Because of this, even a small chemical weapon is still a fairly large device.

Most artillery shells used for such are between 105mm to 155mm in width, with each capable of dispersing its agents over an area of between 30 to 50 meters wide. Add some wind and other weather conditions and the area could be much larger. When a typical battery of artillery, usually six ′tubes′, fires a salvo, the overall area affected would be about 180 to 300 meters wide and possibly double that downwind under the right conditions. Chemical weapons dropped by aircraft are also usually bombs of a binary type and are designed to detonate at least 200 to 300 feet above ground for maximum dispersal. A single bomb could cover an area of about 100 meters wide to as much as 400 meters long, again depending on the wind, humidity, etc.

During World War One, the earliest use of such gas agents by the Germans involved a simpler means of dispersal involving the release of the gas from pressurized cylinders. This method was often as dangerous to the Germans as it was to the intended targets. The last notable incident where cylinder-released gas agents were employed was the Moscow theater hostage crisis in October of 2002. Chechen terrorists took over the Dubrovka Theater and held some 850 Russians hostage. On the third day of the crisis, a Russian special forces unit assaulted the theater, first dispersing an aerosol agent known as Naloxone in hopes of putting everyone inside the theater to sleep. Along with about 40 terrorists, some 130 hostages died from the gas being released through the theater′s ventilation system.

The point of all of this is very simple. If the reports of Syria using Sarin or VX gas are true, there should be far more victims killed than 150. When Saddam Hussein used aircraft to drop chemical weapon bombs on Kurdish villages, thousands died. Those were small, remote villages. Aleppo is a very large city. Given the effectiveness of chemical weapons and their characteristics, using such in a tactical role in a dense, urban area is just impractical. If they were used, there would be plenty of evidence from both victims, their clothing and from any exposed material, including soil samples.

Ben Rhodes helped fabricate the Benghazi talking points for the Barack Obama administration, which Susan Rice used during her talk show marathon. We know that it was a work of fiction, something Rhodes is trained, if not skilled, to create. Now, we are supposed to trust Obama and believe Ben Rhodes story about Syria using chemical weapons. Sorry, but I′m not buying it. Obama is embroiled in a series of domestic scandals, a great time to ′Wag the Dog′ with a new war to distract attention. That is the more likely scenario here.

Yes! Yours truly will be on the air during this popular call-in talk show. The ladies out there will now finally be able to hear my deep, sexy voice, which I′m sure would have been a bit hit at Avril Haines′ bookstore during those erotic literature readings. You can even call in with questions or comments at 1-347-327-9601 and listen in at this link to ″The Truth Is Out There – Voice of The People.″ What a great way to celebrate Father′s Day by talking about the ever growing list of Obama scandals!

This is an Open Thread article today, being a Friday Freakshow kind of day. Are you as outraged or flabbergasted as I am over Obama appointing Avril Haines to be the Number Two at the CIA? Perhaps you are more upset over Obama doing a ′Wag the Dog′ by sending arms to rebels in Syria to distract us from his other scandals? Or maybe you would like to weigh in on the truly important story confronting us all, did Kanye West cheat on Kim Kardashian? That is almost as important as whether Kim will eat her placenta or not after giving birth to Kanye and her ′love child.′

As Captain Binghamton from the old TV series, ″McHale′s Navy″, would say, ″Sometimes I could just scream!″ Granted, I am still an optimist for the long haul. Sure, America may implode for one reason or another, reducing our population by 90% and leaving the cities as heaps of ashes. But my faith that the survivors will rebuild and create ′a more perfect union′ is unshakable. But it is times like these with stories like these that do stretch the envelop of one′s sanity. How the heck did we fall so far, so fast as a civilization?

Who knows? Maybe Barack Obama appointing his new CIA Deputy Director, Avril Haines, is a good thing. Now employees of the Central Intelligence Agency will spend less time searching porn sites on their computers since Avril can set up erotic literature readings for them. No wonder CIA Director Michael Morell resigned! With all of the Obama White House scandals we are being bludgeoned with these days, it is time to get out of Dodge!

Wow! And to think just 9 or 10 months ago, Bill Clinton praised Obama at the DNC convention, helping him to get reelected. Does Clinton really mean that Obama is a fool and a wus? Is this payback for the 2008 slur when Obama accused the Clintons of being racists, and stealing the nomination from Hillary? Has Bill calculated that this is the perfect moment to take down Obama as his administration faces a growing list of scandals?

One fly in the ointment to helping Hillary secure the nomination in 2016, aside from Benghazi Gate, is the latest Obama scandal concerning his ambassador to Belgium, Howard Gutman. CBS News reported on Monday that a State Department memo from its Inspector General claims that Gutman allegedly would routinely ditch his security detail in order to engage prostitutes and sex with minors. That as many as 8 attempts to investigate these allegations were squashed by State Department officials during Hillary Clinton′s term as its Secretary. Gutman released a statement denying the allegations, and the State Department has also denied that there has been any cover up of possible criminal activities by their diplomats.

So the timing of Bill Clinton as he parts ways with Obama does make one wonder what Bill is up to? Is his calling Barack Obama a wus and a total fool because of inaction in Syria some payback for 2008? Or is Bill using this opportunity to boost Hillary′s chances in 2016 as the Obama White House continues to get buried deeper in the growing list of scandals? It does not surprise me that Bill Clinton agrees with Sen. John McCain about booting Bashar Assad from Syria. In many ways, they are birds of a feather, especially when it comes to Barack Obama.

The question of whether or not Snowden is a ′Hero or a Traitor′ has caused some unusual alliances of thought. Who would believe Michael Moore and Julian Assange being on the same side of an issue with Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck? Even Dr. Michael Savage has been pitching hard on this topic, calling this the biggest scandal in our times.

In reality, Snowden did not really do all that much. Anybody with an IQ over 50 knew or suspected that our government was monitoring all forms of communications. All Snowden did was to confirm such and give us some idea as to the scope of the NSA surveillance program. Hardly cause for him to spend his life in prison over. We have seen people accused of far worse getting off scott-free by juries.

Big Government leads to Big Tyranny, which then leads us to Big Gulags and Big Death Camps. Big Data helps Big Government in executing this trend-line. Obama says we can trust him as his cronies collect information about every phone call, computer keystroke and credit card transaction we make. Just as we could trust him to spend our tax money wisely, or his tax collectors not abusing their positions of power.

Edward Snowden may be fired by Boos Allen Hamilton but he is a hero and a whistleblower in the truest sense of the term. The NSA leaker has poked the eyes of his masters as they spy on us average, law-abiding citizens. Keep in mind that Snowden admitted that he is a Liberal Democrat and voted for Obama. But he has seen enough to realize that Obama and his administration are a bunch of liars and appear to be doing whatever they can to shred what little remains of our Constitution. Better to be a late-comer hero than traitorous hack for keeping the Establishment in power.

Rand Paul has been making himself a nuisance to the Old Guard of worn-out, tiresome politicians residing in Washington, DC. Be they Dianne Feinstein, Harry Reid, John McCain or Lindsay Graham, one has to wonder what these old sour pusses still have to offer the nation? Experience? Wisdom? Hardly! It is a miracle that they can still talk without drooling all over themselves.

After his 13-hour filibuster over the White House drone program, Sen. Paul has shown that he is ready to lead the fight against Obama. With his Objectivist-Libertarian background, Rand Paul has picked up the sword handed down to him by his father, Ron Paul. But while the younger seems to be ready to slay dragons, The Establishment politicians ridicule him as one who is jousting with windmills.

So would you sign your name to a class action lawsuit which Rand Paul intends to take before the Supreme Court to end the NSA spying of phone records and Internet activity? The senator from Kentucky announced on Fox News Sunday that he is preparing a two-prong defense of the Fourth Amendment against Barack Obama and the National Security Agency. Se, Paul will also introduce legislation to curtail the NSA surveillance of American citizens by reinforcing the 4th Amendment and adding new safeguards to the Patriot Act. Is Rand Paul the man of the hour to save America from Big Government? Or will he become a Don Quixote, a broken down fool?