<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="0.91"><channel><title>RFF Regulating Risks</title><link>http://www.rff.org</link><description>RFF Regulating Risks</description><language>en-us</language><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/RFF_Regulating_Risks" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><title>Come Rain or Shine: Evidence on Flood Insurance Purchases in Florida</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/rB_vAMHiQ_o/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/rB_vAMHiQ_o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20951</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Unholy Trinity: Fat Tails, Tail Dependence, and Micro-Correlations</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/0X5Div45oJk/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/0X5Div45oJk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20949</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Will Global Warming Discount Rates Short-Change Our Grandkids?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/pGtHmgRsASs/Ethics-and-Discounting-Global-Warming-Damages.aspx</link><description>Commentary: Oxford's Cameron Hepburn considers the role of ethics in calculating discount rates for global warming damages to future generations and how to reconcile differing views in the debate.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/pGtHmgRsASs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/WPC/Pages/Ethics-and-Discounting-Global-Warming-Damages.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Production Risk and Farm Technology Adoption in Rain-Fed, Semi-Arid Lands of Kenya</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/QlrkROLEXSM/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/QlrkROLEXSM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20931</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Reality of Precaution</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/jlZNxIj8OYw/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>The "Precautionary Principle"?allowing or favoring regulation of risks despite uncertainty?has been at the center of debates about European and U.S. risk management since the 1990s. Does adopting the precautionary principle protect us against uncertain risks, or does it inhibit progress and introduce new risks? Has Europe become "more precautionary" than the United States? &lt;i&gt;The Reality of Precaution&lt;/i&gt; is the first study to go beyond the rhetoric of precaution as an abstract principle and test the reality of precaution in practice. Challenging conventional wisdom about European and U.S. approaches to risk regulation, this groundbreaking resource finds that since the 1970s there has been little transatlantic difference in the overall level of precaution, but that instead there have been variations in precaution across particular individual risks. For example, while Europe has been more precautionary regarding genetically modified foods, beef hormones, toxic chemicals, and climate change, the U.S. has been more precautionary regarding mad cow disease, air pollution, ozone depletion, and terrorism. Moreover, both the U.S. and Europe have adopted systems of regulatory oversight through impact assessment.
Combining a dozen case studies, a quantitative analysis of almost 3,000 risks,and cross-cutting chapters on politics, law, and risk perceptions, this book argues that the relationship between U.S. and European regulatory approaches is best understood not as conflict or competition, nor in terms of divergence or reversal, but rather as a
process of selective application of precaution to particular risks, and a continuing exchange of ideas yielding mutual cooperation and hybridization. &lt;i&gt;The Reality of Precaution&lt;/i&gt; advises policymakers in both the U.S. and Europe to compare actual regulatory experience, to borrow useful policy designs, and to seek optimal (not maximal) precaution that accounts fully for risks, costs, and ancillary impacts.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/jlZNxIj8OYw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20919</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Assessing the Growing Dangers of Tiny Things</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/AQCxRfz4xBQ/</link><description>Resources Magazine: Nanotechnology promises big benefits, but RFF?s Terry Davies says that governments lack the oversight needed to reduce health, social, and environmental risks.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/AQCxRfz4xBQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://video.rff.org:8000/~rff/uniflip/resources172/#page12</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A New Approach to Reforming the National Flood Insurance Program</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/Km5XTS5IIPQ/New-Approach-to-Reforming-National-Flood-Insurance.aspx</link><description>Commentary: Adding a federal community flood insurance option could increase coverage, spread risk, and lower premiums, says RFF resident scholar Leonard Shabman.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/Km5XTS5IIPQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/WPC/Pages/New-Approach-to-Reforming-National-Flood-Insurance.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Informed Consent in Social Science</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/EDcqzMWl2w8/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/EDcqzMWl2w8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20889</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A Shopping List for America?s Riskiest Foods</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/pVV7sWLCUbY/</link><description>Resources Magazine: Foodborne illness can be blamed on a surprisingly small number of foods and pathogens, according to a new study.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/pVV7sWLCUbY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://video.rff.org:8000/~rff/uniflip/resources172/#page16</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Insuring Against Catastrophe: A Feasible Goal?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/iFU7a0fadDo/</link><description>Resources Magazine: Roger Cooke and Carolyn Kousky look at the variables involved in the increasing toll of natural disasters and suggest insurance strategies, practical building measures, and public policies to deal with risks from catastrophe.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/iFU7a0fadDo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://video.rff.org:8000/~rff/uniflip/resources172/#page20</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Persistance of Risk</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/lSOlZ7xy90g/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/lSOlZ7xy90g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20872</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A Brief History of Quantitative Risk Assessment</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/o4jG2NjDL_A/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/o4jG2NjDL_A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20873</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Nanotechnology and Risk</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/uUWsLt6PFSo/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/uUWsLt6PFSo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20875</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Are Catastrophes Insurable?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/rgreUu4qjUo/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/rgreUu4qjUo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20871</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Resources 172 - Summer 2009</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/-wAsaElChso/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/-wAsaElChso" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20870</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>New Ideas for Risk Regulation</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/x3sk_mP-5yg/New-Ideas-for-Risk-Regulation.aspx</link><description>A two-day conference co-sponsored by RFF and the Society for Risk Analysis looked at options for improving the regulation environmental, health, safety, and security risks.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/x3sk_mP-5yg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Events/Pages/New-Ideas-for-Risk-Regulation.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Reflections on Three Decades of Energy Policy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/jRntEjFTx1s/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/jRntEjFTx1s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20838</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Climate Policy and Competition: U.S. Industry?s Regulatory Dilemma</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/UjsGDE7kEUk/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/UjsGDE7kEUk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20839</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Future of Regulatory Oversight and Analysis</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/eiV_2n7fwf0/09_06_08_Future_of_Regulatory_Oversight_and_Analysis.aspx</link><description>In a June 8 commentary, Susan Dudley and Art Fraas discuss the role of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in providing independent assessments of the benefits and costs of agency rulemakings.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/eiV_2n7fwf0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/WPC/Pages/09_06_08_Future_of_Regulatory_Oversight_and_Analysis.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Hurricanes, Risk, and Liability: Looking to Congress for Relief  </title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/rxmUR8TiSQE/article1005352.ece</link><description>Three legislative approaches are being considered to create effective public policies to deal with catastrophic natural disasters, such as large-scale hurricanes. An op-ed in the &lt;i&gt;St. Petersburg Times&lt;/i&gt; by Roger Cooke and Carolyn Kousky examines the merits of each.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/rxmUR8TiSQE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.tampabay.com/news/perspective/article1005352.ece</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Risk Implications of Farm Technology Adoption in the Ethiopian Highlands</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/Jrva6WyUgRo/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/Jrva6WyUgRo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20815</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Governing Uncertainty: Environmental Regulation in the Age of Nanotechnology</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/W3sXcDCbNs0/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>Nanotechnology promises to transform the materials of everyday life, leading to smaller and more powerful computers, more durable plastics and fabrics, cheap and effective water purification systems, more efficient solar panels and storage batteries, and medical devices capable of tracking down and killing cancer cells or treating neurological diseases. Policy analysts predict a radical change in the industrial sector, and at present, the U.S. government spends nearly $2 billion annually on nanotechnology research and development.  

Yet the nanotechnology revolution is not straightforward. Enthusiasm about nanotechnology?s future is tempered by recognition of the hurdles to its responsible development, including the capacity of government to support technological innovation and economic growth while also addressing potential environmental and public health impacts.  This is the first volume to engage scholarly perspectives on environmental regulation in light of the challenges posed by emerging nanotechnologies.

Contributors focus on the overarching lessons of decades of regulatory response, while posing a fundamental core question: How can government regulatory systems satisfy the desire for scientific innovation while also taking into account the direct and indirect effects of 21st emerging technologies, particularly in the face of scientific uncertainties? With perspectives from economics, history, philosophy, and public policy, this new resource illuminates the various challenges inherent in the development of nanotechnology and works towards a reorganization of government regulatory approaches.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/W3sXcDCbNs0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20809</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Consultative Forum on AMFm ? The Affordable Medicines Facility - malaria</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/LEpboY1UuaE/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/LEpboY1UuaE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20794</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>AMFm: Reaching the Poorest of the Poor with Effective Malaria Drugs</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/UI-1htZOskE/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/UI-1htZOskE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20793</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Unintended Impacts of Multiple Instruments on Technology Adoption</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/aZA8kLvISh8/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/aZA8kLvISh8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20764</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Optimal Enforcement and Practical Issues of Resource Protection in Developing Countries</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/dWddS5y2gLE/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/dWddS5y2gLE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20766</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Improving Flood Insurance and Flood Risk Management: Insights from St. Louis, Missouri</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/qod5r5XLzHU/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/qod5r5XLzHU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20756</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Energy Security and Climate Change Protection: Complementarity or Tradeoff?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/AiPnV_-5WtM/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/AiPnV_-5WtM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20744</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Willingness to Pay for Mortality Risk Reductions:  Does Latency Matter?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/WTHUt5gR9b4/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/WTHUt5gR9b4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20737</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Value of Mortality Risk Reductions in Delhi, India</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/LdPtNivuBjg/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/LdPtNivuBjg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20738</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Impact of Policies to Control Motor Vehicle Emissions in Mumbai, India </title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/Lqt-m2ENdXM/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/Lqt-m2ENdXM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20739</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Why Have Traffic Fatalities Declined in Industrialised Countries?  Implications for Pedestrians and Vehicle Occupants</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/TbjA4o3jbS8/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/TbjA4o3jbS8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20740</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Measuring the welfare effects of slum improvement programs: The case of Mumbai </title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/meT1_K7-P0g/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/meT1_K7-P0g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20741</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Demand for Insecticide-Treated Mosquito Nets</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/ZihxyTyoHRc/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/ZihxyTyoHRc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20734</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Food Safety: Challenges to the System</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/mTDehVrTuH4/Reforming_Regulation_of_Food_Safety.aspx</link><description>Experts in regulating food safety at an RFF First Wednesday Seminar discuss recent food scares and strategies to strengthen the food safety network and protect public health.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/mTDehVrTuH4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Events/Pages/Reforming_Regulation_of_Food_Safety.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Climate Change and Risk Management: Challenges for Insurance, Adaptation, and Loss Estimation</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/9EISsXGRsy4/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/9EISsXGRsy4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20716</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Restructuring India?s Chaotic Water System</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/iDxMLe9OUSU/Taming_the_Anarchy.aspx</link><description>&lt;em&gt;Taming the Anarchy&lt;/em&gt;, a just-published book from RFF Press and the International Water Management Institute, proposes new water policies to regulate irrigation practices across the Indian subcontinent.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/iDxMLe9OUSU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/News/Features/Pages/Taming_the_Anarchy.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>New Protocols for Keeping Planes Apart </title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/t0ZIvsVoEZo/New_Protocol_for_Keeping_Planes_Apart.aspx</link><description>As air traffic volume continues to grow, the need for new ? and safe ? ways to merge and separate planes in flight is more important than ever. A new paper by Chauncey Starr Senior Fellow Roger Cooke assesses proposed NASA protocols.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/t0ZIvsVoEZo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/News/Features/Pages/New_Protocol_for_Keeping_Planes_Apart.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>System Level Risk Analysis of New Merging and Spacing
Protocols</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/4cPM-pAhXDs/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/4cPM-pAhXDs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20646</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Taxes, Permits, and the Diffusions of a New Technology</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/qeR1QcbTlPA/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/qeR1QcbTlPA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20644</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Smog Check</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/8itzg8xPIxE/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>When a new federal regulatory program conflicts with an existing state-level system, whose approach should prevail? During the 1990s, the federal government sought to implement the Clean Air Act Amendments and resolve previous problems that it had with compliance. This lead to an intense conflict between U.S. EPA regulators and the state of California. The disagreement involved a federally mandated auto emissions program with centralized testing and California?s existing program that was implemented through local garages (service stations)?a program that was popularly called ?Smog Check.? The dispute over Smog Check grew into a clash that had national significance and was further complicated by a recession, the politics of a gubernatorial election, a transition between presidential administrations, and California?s possible loss of nearly $1 billion in federal funds if the state failed to comply with EPA mandates.&lt;P&gt;

The debate over Smog Check ended when EPA finally granted California, and the rest of the nation, greater regulatory flexibility. Fundamental to the Smog Check controversy were questions about federal versus state authority as well as battles between colorful personalities. In his new book, &lt;i&gt;Smog Check&lt;/i&gt;, Douglas S. Eisinger presents these struggles in fascinating, first-hand detail. Eisinger, an EPA official at the time of this conflict, probes deeply into the issues and explores broader questions including: when does it become imperative for agencies to bargain with one another, when should regulatory flexibility and performance-based regulations be favored over command and control approaches, what should be done when decisions need to be made in the face of scientific disagreement about both the scope of a problem and the effectiveness of different solutions? He concludes the book with commentary from other former EPA officials who were witnesses or participants in the Smog Check controversy.&lt;P&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Smog Check&lt;/i&gt; is engaging reading for students interested in intergovernmental relations and regulatory reform. It provides insight for policy professionals involved in environmental
protection whenever it involves coordination between federal and state or local agencies.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/8itzg8xPIxE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20641</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Does Disclosure Reduce Pollution? Evidence from India?s Green
Rating Project</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/AyjFkLQeQXM/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/AyjFkLQeQXM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20637</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Long-Term Risks and Short-Term Regulations: Modeling the Transition from Enhanced Oil Recovery to Geologic Carbon Sequestration</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/M7lyqg8Z2KQ/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/M7lyqg8Z2KQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20595</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>How Should We Tackle the Forest Fire Problem?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/LNQ3Mh5FRX0/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/LNQ3Mh5FRX0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20581</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Options Contracts for Contingent Takings</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/10KAjzU_xXI/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/10KAjzU_xXI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20574</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Private Investment and Government Protection
</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/xrgOEQhdqsc/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/xrgOEQhdqsc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20575</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Obstacles to Clear Thinking about Natural Disasters: Five Lessons for Policy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/NFr4z0QCTSg/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/NFr4z0QCTSg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20570</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Incidence of U.S. Climate Policy: Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/jLseGWlgd_A/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/jLseGWlgd_A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20545</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Managing Forces of Change: A Policy View</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/IeMxJhzDF8c/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/IeMxJhzDF8c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20530</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Balancing Cost and Emissions Certainty: An Allowance Reserve for Cap-and-Trade</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/dTuuJPU-YB8/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/dTuuJPU-YB8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20517</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Trade, GMOs, and Environmental Risk: Are Policies Likely to Improve Welfare?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/r-kkGEq7d4w/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/r-kkGEq7d4w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20519</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Gaps in Aging Levees Leave DC Landmarks Exposed</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/zovQ96rwhlE/ALeqM5iVnV-aPGVLcCLNEtHh0xPxKP0V3wD924R7303</link><description>&lt;div class=ExternalClassB3BE495B40A94AA3BEF8657B1D29C155&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=verdana color="#444444" size=2&gt;&lt;b&gt;Leonard Shabman&lt;/b&gt; comments on the failure to ensure maintenance and repair of DC levees. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/zovQ96rwhlE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iVnV-aPGVLcCLNEtHh0xPxKP0V3wD924R7303</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Cosmic Markdown: EPA Says Life Is Worth Less</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/GrKiAbLaL50/AR2008071803235.html</link><description>&lt;div class=ExternalClass65BF360C254D458BBEA34D0156842778&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;font face=verdana color="#444444" size=2&gt;&lt;b&gt;Joe Aldy&lt;/b&gt; discusses research involved in determining the value of statistical life&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/GrKiAbLaL50" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/18/AR2008071803235.html?hpid=topnews</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Floodproofing the Future</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/3CWXFt3EYw8/CostsandrisksKousky.aspx</link><description>The best way to reduce damage from floods is to keep people out of harm's way, argues Carolyn Kousky in a recent op-ed published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Kousky, a new fellow, joined RFF in September.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/3CWXFt3EYw8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/News/Features/Pages/CostsandrisksKousky.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>An Update on the Science of Acidification in the Adirondack Park</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/WFjdk-4tz4s/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/WFjdk-4tz4s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20394</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Offsets: Incentivizing Reductions While Managing Uncertainty and Ensuring Integrity</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/OXY-swdTnZg/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/OXY-swdTnZg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=20392</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Revamping Regulation </title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/vm2cUnFQx0A/Regulatory-Impact-Analysis-Workshop.aspx</link><description>An RFF workshop bringing together government officials, economists, and legal experts launches an initiative to examine potential reforms to traditional benefit-cost analysis that would respond to concerns of critics.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/vm2cUnFQx0A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/News/Features/Pages/Regulatory-Impact-Analysis-Workshop.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Elicitation from Large, Heterogeneous Expert Panels:  Using Multiple Uncertainty Measures to Characterize Information Quality for Decision Analysis.</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/Dztsc572mLA/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/Dztsc572mLA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=19193</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Are Decisionmakers at Home on the Range?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/nEtBgqBIU9k/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/nEtBgqBIU9k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=19158</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Corporate Social Responsibility Through an Economic Lens</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/NNqJUNKB9Sc/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/NNqJUNKB9Sc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=18889</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Role of Soil Conservation on Mean Crop Yield and Variance of Yield: Evidence from the Ethiopian Highlands</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/5AtfjvHM8bQ/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/5AtfjvHM8bQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=17531</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Economics of Soil Conservation Adoption in High-Rainfall Areas of the
Ethiopian Highlands</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/G0Lb_DyrGFQ/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/G0Lb_DyrGFQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=17532</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/yGLrnuxe-Ec/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/yGLrnuxe-Ec" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=17535</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What Drives Participation in State Voluntary Cleanup Programs?
Evidence from Oregon
</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/-FE2Um6wlwY/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/-FE2Um6wlwY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=17524</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Market Imperfections and Farm Technology Adoption Decisions:
A Case Study from the Highlands of Ethiopia</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/gMyFMiJbyxw/PublicationDetails.aspx</link><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/gMyFMiJbyxw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=17529</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>RFF Scholar Considers EPA Oversight for Nanotechnology </title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/Q2l85PVN8GY/Scholar-Considers-EPA-Oversight-For-Nanotechnology.aspx</link><description>Senior Fellow Terry Davies authors new report released by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars' Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/Q2l85PVN8GY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/News/press_Releases/Pages/Scholar-Considers-EPA-Oversight-For-Nanotechnology.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Post-Katrina: Getting the Incentives and Priorities Right</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/OlOATil8K7k/Post-Katrina-Getting-the-Incentives-and-Priorities-Right.aspx</link><description>Senior Fellow Kate Probst and Journalist-in-Residence J.W. Anderson argue that we need to rethink the Federal response to Katrina to make sure the right questions get asked, and the right decisions are made.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/OlOATil8K7k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/News/Features/Pages/Post-Katrina-Getting-the-Incentives-and-Priorities-Right.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Taking Risks on the Space Frontier</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/RbD3yRpM3gc/Taking-Risks-on-the-Space-Frontier.aspx</link><description>In the new issue of Resources, Senior Fellow Molly Macauley explores how human risk in space activities should be approached and managed.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/RbD3yRpM3gc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/News/Features/Pages/Taking-Risks-on-the-Space-Frontier.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Sudden Catastrophic Change: Costing Out The Challenges of Preparing for the Worst </title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~3/9_t6zOxmdz0/Environmental-Catastrophe-and-Cost-Benefit-Analysis.aspx</link><description>Judge Richard A. Posner, author of Overcoming Law and Catastrophe: Risk and Response, speaks at the March RFF First Wednesday Seminar.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RFF_Regulating_Risks/~4/9_t6zOxmdz0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.rff.org/Events/Pages/Environmental-Catastrophe-and-Cost-Benefit-Analysis.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
