<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Planning Pool</title>
	
	<link>http://planningpool.com</link>
	<description>Cutting Edge Urban Planning + New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/PlanningPool" /><feedburner:info uri="planningpool" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/</creativeCommons:license><feedburner:emailServiceId>PlanningPool</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Five of the most unwalkable places in the world</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlanningPool/~3/hvY7ZR1ZxRk/</link>
		<comments>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/land-use/unwalkable-places-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit transit oriented development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walkability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planningpool.com/?p=2032</guid>
		<description>For this final instalment of FAIL Week, we take a look at a few places that you would never want to set foot in. These cities and neighbourhoods are meant to be experienced in a bucket seat, and it shows!
 1. Eagle Bend, Jacksonville, Florida (The entrance has no sidewalk.)
View Larger Map
According to Walkscore.com, this [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlanningPool/~4/hvY7ZR1ZxRk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/land-use/unwalkable-places-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/land-use/unwalkable-places-world/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hang’Em High for….rain barrels?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlanningPool/~3/JmC1XPWFdYY/</link>
		<comments>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/land-use/water-land-use/hangem-high-forrain-barrels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rain barrels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planningpool.com/?p=2024</guid>
		<description>We all know that outdated legislation can often be one of the largest barriers change.  Up until 2009, in the state of Colorado it was illegal to have a rain barrel and still is illegal for a majority of its residents.  They would probably not hang you for it and it was mostly [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlanningPool/~4/JmC1XPWFdYY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/land-use/water-land-use/hangem-high-forrain-barrels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/land-use/water-land-use/hangem-high-forrain-barrels/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Food Policy Fail – British Columbia’s Meat Inspection Regulations (Editorial)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlanningPool/~3/PReyMsxTDQw/</link>
		<comments>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/food/food-policy-fail-british-columbias-meat-inspection-regulations-editorial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local economic development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planningpool.com/?p=2012</guid>
		<description>In tackling the subject of British Columbia&amp;#8217;s meat inspection regulations, I must begin by admitting that I am not the likeliest author. For starters, I&amp;#8217;m a vegetarian. Secondly, although someday I would love to keep urban chickens, my agricultural experience is pretty much limited to growing herbs and tomatoes on my apartment patio. However, the [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlanningPool/~4/PReyMsxTDQw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/food/food-policy-fail-british-columbias-meat-inspection-regulations-editorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/food/food-policy-fail-british-columbias-meat-inspection-regulations-editorial/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Editorial: Planning Journalism Fail in Vancouver</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlanningPool/~3/ZMqi9UPTFWA/</link>
		<comments>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/education/editorial/planning-journalism-fail-vancouver-green-solutions-green-outcomes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car-Centric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car-Centricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Owen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eco-Density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Metropolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planningpool.com/?p=2000</guid>
		<description>Planning fails are often the physical manifestation of misguided perceptions. Though well-intentioned, perpetuating outdated beliefs is irresponsible; green solutions should have green outcomes.
The article ‘Green solutions come from many directions,’ published in the Vancouver Sun on March 9, 2010 refers to a survey in late 2009 that lists “sustainability issues in transportation” as Vancouver, BC’s [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlanningPool/~4/ZMqi9UPTFWA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/education/editorial/planning-journalism-fail-vancouver-green-solutions-green-outcomes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/education/editorial/planning-journalism-fail-vancouver-green-solutions-green-outcomes/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Video</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlanningPool/~3/eLqDljnsv64/</link>
		<comments>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/uncategorized/weekly-video-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona counties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombay beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperial valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salton sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san diego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekly video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yuma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planningpool.com/?p=1989</guid>
		<description>Having made many eastbound trips along &lt;a href="http://www.interstate-guide.com/i-008.html" target="_blank"&gt;I-8&lt;/a&gt; from San Diego to other locations (sometimes Phoenix, other times further), I'm fairly familiar with the subject of this week's video... 

&lt;script src="http://www.vbs.tv/vbs_player.js?width=480&amp;#038;height=270&amp;#038;ec=g1bGlvOqddVFWynqHRRb4qOk6f4dgceQ&amp;#038;st=Toxic&amp;#038;pl=http://www.vbs.tv/watch/toxic/toxic-imperial-valley-1-of-2" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlanningPool/~4/eLqDljnsv64" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/uncategorized/weekly-video-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/uncategorized/weekly-video-3/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>transitFAIL: Using social media to make things better</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlanningPool/~3/_DyKSFO0PvY/</link>
		<comments>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/communication/transitfail-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hashtag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDXplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transitFail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planningpool.com/?p=1946</guid>
		<description>Welcome to Fail Week here on PlanningPool! All week we will be bringing  you information about bad planning, lack of planning, and planning generally gone awry.
At PlanningPool, we&amp;#8217;re big fans of Twitter, because it&amp;#8217;s a tool that combines the less high-tech (cell phones) with the more high tech (internet) and gets people in touch [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlanningPool/~4/_DyKSFO0PvY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/communication/transitfail-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/communication/transitfail-social-media/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Liveblogging the UBC Resilience Symposium: Uncertain Water Supplies</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlanningPool/~3/1nh0-DlxLu8/</link>
		<comments>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/event-review/liveblogging-ubc-resilience-symposium-uncertain-water-supplies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Event Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liveblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planningpool.com/?p=1975</guid>
		<description>Today, PlanningPool is coming to you live from the Symposium on Resilience at the University of British Columbia, where we just presented a lively panel discussion about Digital Media. (Our slides are online here.) Thanks to Karen Quinn Fung and Frances Bula for participating in the discussion!
An interdisciplinary panel of graduate students and professionals are [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlanningPool/~4/1nh0-DlxLu8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/event-review/liveblogging-ubc-resilience-symposium-uncertain-water-supplies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/event-review/liveblogging-ubc-resilience-symposium-uncertain-water-supplies/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Edmonton’s new growth plan gets serious about food security</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlanningPool/~3/IYbXkh1UwFs/</link>
		<comments>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/food/edmontons-growth-plan-considers-food-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmonton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban growth boundary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planningpool.com/?p=1952</guid>
		<description>Thanks largely to a local alliance of citizen advocates, the City of Edmonton, Canada, is moving forward with a draft Growth Plan that gets serious about food security. The Greater Edmonton Alliance, composed mostly of churches and unions, has played a key role in shaping the draft plan, entitled The Way We Grow. (A giant [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlanningPool/~4/IYbXkh1UwFs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/food/edmontons-growth-plan-considers-food-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/food/edmontons-growth-plan-considers-food-security/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Come see us present about Digital Media &amp; Planning at UBC on Friday!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlanningPool/~3/8YCy1UkYEYw/</link>
		<comments>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/event-review/upcoming-events/present-digital-media-planning-ubc-friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Upcoming Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graduate student society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of british columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planningpool.com/2010/03/event-review/upcoming-events/present-digital-media-planning-ubc-friday/</guid>
		<description>If you&amp;#8217;re in Vancouver on Friday morning and have some time, drop by the University of British Columbia&amp;#8217;s Graduate Student Society building and see us present about digital media &amp;#38; public engagement! Registration is $25 for students and you can find out more information here.
Hope to see you then!
Edited to add:
Our introductory slides for this [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlanningPool/~4/8YCy1UkYEYw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/event-review/upcoming-events/present-digital-media-planning-ubc-friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/event-review/upcoming-events/present-digital-media-planning-ubc-friday/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Video</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlanningPool/~3/DlaOHCi_Sq4/</link>
		<comments>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/uncategorized/weekly-video-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bigthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter drucker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://planningpool.com/2010/03/uncategorized/weekly-video-2/</guid>
		<description>Gazing toward the future, and hopefully beyond these dismal economic times, what will cities look like?  Though it's easy to get excited about the technologies that might shape the built realities of civilization, any sociologist will tell you that cities are at least equally defined by their inhabitants... 
&lt;script src="http://video.bigthink.com/player.js?embedCode=IzbGM1MTp4uYCFs8bnbEn5GBtPxSEDQd&amp;#038;height=288&amp;#038;autoplay=1&amp;#038;width=512&amp;#038;deepLinkEmbedCode=IzbGM1MTp4uYCFs8bnbEn5GBtPxSEDQd"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PlanningPool/~4/DlaOHCi_Sq4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/uncategorized/weekly-video-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://planningpool.com/2010/03/uncategorized/weekly-video-2/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
