<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Phone Junkie</title>
	
	<link>http://phone-junkie.com</link>
	<description>Cell Phone News, Information, and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/PhoneJunkie" /><feedburner:info uri="phonejunkie" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>PhoneJunkie</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FPhoneJunkie" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FPhoneJunkie" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FPhoneJunkie" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FPhoneJunkie" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FPhoneJunkie" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>In Alternate Universe 2010, the Watch Phone Has AT&amp;T On Its Knees [Retromodo]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~3/fIDyQi-l7lI/in-alternate-universe-2010-the-watch-phone-has-att-on-its-knees</link>
		<comments>http://gizmodo.com/5489555/in-alternate-universe-2010-the-watch-phone-has-att-on-its-knees#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle VanHemert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5489555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/attphone2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_attphone2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Sure, it seems like everyone has an iPhone today, but in bizarro 2010 <i>literally</i> everyone has a watch phone. They're miniature. They're wireless. They have geometric buttons. And they're eating bizarro AT&#38;T's bandwidth alive. Oh, 1995, you are so naive.</p>
<p>This ad was dug up by <a href="http://www.wiredreread.com/">Wired Reread</a>, a site that does just what its name suggests. Sometimes it's funny, sometimes it's sad, sort of like looking at the promises people wrote in your middle school yearbook. [<a href="http://www.wiredreread.com/">Wired Reread</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/03/09/wired-reread-att-wri.html">BoingBoing</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/attphone2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_attphone2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="In Alternate Universe 2010, the Watch Phone Has AT&T On Its Knees"/></a>Sure, it seems like everyone has an iPhone today, but in bizarro 2010 <i>literally</i> everyone has a watch phone. They're miniature. They're wireless. They have geometric buttons. And they're eating bizarro AT&T's bandwidth alive. Oh, 1995, you are so naive.</p>
<p>This ad was dug up by <a href="http://www.wiredreread.com/">Wired Reread</a>, a site that does just what its name suggests. Sometimes it's funny, sometimes it's sad, sort of like looking at the promises people wrote in your middle school yearbook. [<a href="http://www.wiredreread.com/">Wired Reread</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/03/09/wired-reread-att-wri.html">BoingBoing</a>]</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~4/fIDyQi-l7lI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/5489555/in-alternate-universe-2010-the-watch-phone-has-att-on-its-knees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gizmodo.com/5489555/in-alternate-universe-2010-the-watch-phone-has-att-on-its-knees</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cellphone Overshare [Infographics]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~3/Cfgxn0LJSh8/cellphone-overshare</link>
		<comments>http://gizmodo.com/5489036/cellphone-overshare#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5489036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/090903-is-mobile.png"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_090903-is-mobile.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>In Taiwan, there are more cellphones than people. About 7% of all mobile data goes to movie information. And Google owns nearly 100% of the mobile search market. These, and more fun facts in this handy infographic! [<a href="http://dataviz.tumblr.com/post/433636552">DataViz</a> via <a href="http://chartporn.org/2010/03/08/mobile-pie-chart-hell/?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ChartPorn+%28Chart+Porn%29">ChartPorn</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/090903-is-mobile.png"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_090903-is-mobile.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="Cellphone Overshare"/></a>In Taiwan, there are more cellphones than people. About 7% of all mobile data goes to movie information. And Google owns nearly 100% of the mobile search market. These, and more fun facts in this handy infographic! [<a href="http://dataviz.tumblr.com/post/433636552">DataViz</a> via <a href="http://chartporn.org/2010/03/08/mobile-pie-chart-hell/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ChartPorn+%28Chart+Porn%29">ChartPorn</a>]</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~4/Cfgxn0LJSh8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/5489036/cellphone-overshare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gizmodo.com/5489036/cellphone-overshare</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive [Android]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~3/iX13aQ9wBt8/htc-legend-review-frankly-it-feels-expensive</link>
		<comments>http://gizmodo.com/5488019/htc-legend-review-frankly-it-feels-expensive#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Hannaford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5488019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-lead_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">With HTC's upcoming crop of Androids, you'll be able to separate people into two distinct groups: those who spring for the brainier, better-specced <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5472642/htc-desire-a-premium-nexus-one-without-the-google">Desire</a>, and those who get bowled over by the beautiful, yet lesser-specced <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5472640/the-htc-legend-traps-android-21-in-unibody-aluminum">Legend</a>.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5472642/htc-desire-a-premium-nexus-one-without-the-google">Desire</a> (or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5443835/nexus-one-review">Nexus One</a>) is the final word in the Androidsphere&#8212;it's a mark of someone who knows what they're doing, who wants to show people they NEED that extra computing power. If you compare it to the Legend, you could be justified in saying Legend-salivators are more shallow, ignoring the might of a Snapdragon processor in lieu of a unibody aluminum shell and slim build.</p>
<p>You'd be wrong, however.</p>
<h1>I Mean, It Is <em>Just</em> a Sequel</h1>
<p>The internal upgrades are minor, when you consider it next to the HTC Hero, but like the Empire Strikes Back, sometimes sequels are far better than the original. While we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5318860/htc-hero-review-ambitious-but-tragically-flawed">found the Hero "tragically flawed" in its slugginess</a>, the Legend's slightly more powerful 600MHz processor behaved&#8212;well, like a legend. The 3.2-inch screen has the same amount of pixels as the Hero, but swaps the HVGA for a more superior AMOLED. The 5.0-megapixel camera is still the same quality, but has the much-welcomed addition of a flash. You get the picture&#8212;the Legend is building on the Hero's quality in incremental upgrades, but every change, however minor, radicalizes the experience of using the Legend.</p>
<p>It's running <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android21" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android21/">Android 2.1</a>, which as any Hero owner knows <em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392237/htc-hero-among-first-to-get-android-20-update">should</a></em> be released as an over-the-air update soon. One day. The jump from 1.6 to 2.1 is impressive&#8212;it's a lot faster, the multitouch is better, there's greater integration of social networking profiles with contacts, and HTML5 support, amongst other&#8212;admittedly small&#8212;changes.</p>
<h2>Design Works</h2>
<p>Plain and simple&#8212;the Legend is the most well-built phone I've ever had in my hand. You just know when you feel the weight of it, the cool curved exterior of the unibody aluminum shell, and touch the ultra-responsive touchscreen. It's that sensation when you first tenderly held the original iPhone, which has been long-missing in the market.</p>
<p>The bottom and top of the back is actually made from rubberized plastic though, so there are no issues with wireless signals&#8212;unlike the first generation of the iPhone. Removing part of the case reveals a very thin battery and a touch-sensitive catch which keeps the SIM and microSD cards encased. It's a small point, but it's also the most polished example of a phone's innards that I've ever seen.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-backcover2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5311754/blackberry-onyx-loses-a-trackball-gains-a-trackpad">Just like BlackBerry</a>, HTC is migrating its trackballs to optical trackpads. This is a relief, but in actual fact I barely had to use the trackpad&#8212;only when having to make an edit when typing out messages or emails. The screen is just so responsive, with nary a wrongly-actioned command made, that you can imagine HTC forgoing the trackpad altogether at a later date.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-optical-trackpad_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></p>
<p>Only eight buttons reside on the Legend's body. The on/off button up top, the two volume controls on the top left, and then on the lower face, home, menu, back and search. They all worked well, though the home, menu, back and search keys did feel a bit cheap in comparison to the high-end feeling of the rest of the handset.</p>
<h2>Same Old Camera?</h2>
<p>HTC's used the same 5.0-megapixel camera as we saw on the Hero, but the addition of a flash is a new and exciting step for them&#8212;strange as that sounds. As you can see from the two photos below, the flash is very strong&#8212;too strong, I'd say. However, the quality is decent in lowlight conditions&#8212;noisy for sure, but I've seen worse.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_camera-3d-glasses.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"><br />
<em>My friends in lowlight at a cinema before Alice In Wonderland 3D</em></p>
<p>In daytime I had a lot more luck. Testing it out on some cakes in my kitchen in the late afternoon sun retained the nice rays of sun across the cakes, with the yellow of the flowers showing up bright. But even at 5MP, the general image performance isn't enough to ditch your point and shoot just yet.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_camera-kitchen-vertical.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"><br />
<em>Testing indoors with daylight</em></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-camera-on_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></p>
<h2>More Sense Than HTC Sense</h2>
<p>Most manufacturers are skinning Android with their own proprietary interfaces...MOTOBLUR, Mediascape, S-Class, they're ok, but I'd almost rather use Android in its natural flavor than have to put up with some of their issues.</p>
<p>There just ain't no Android phone like a HTC Sense Android phone. It's simply the best skin an Android could ask for, even without the minor improvements seen in the Legend. By far the pick of the bunch is the new "Leap" view&#8212;or "Helicopter view" as it was known in-house when designed. It works much like Mac OS X's Exposé function, bringing all seven homescreens up as thumbnails. The feature is very useful, particularly if you just can't remember which screen your mail, or the weather widget, is listed on. The pinch command takes some getting used to, but once you've got the gesture down-pat, it's a godsend.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-helicopter_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"><br />
<em>Leap&#8212;or helicopter&#8212;view</em></p>
<p>But with ever feature that will be used often comes one with no point at all. FriendStream is a nice enough widget, which collates all your friends' updates from Twitter, Facebook and Flickr into one feed, but for anyone who's a purist and likes to see every form of update on each social networking site, it will be removed quickly from the homescreen. I preferred using HTC's own brilliant Twitter widget, Peep, for the full Twitter options, and the Facebook app to see every form of action. The Flickr integration is handy, being able to see when my contacts upload photos, but not necessary if you get email notifications already.</p>
<p>Plus, FriendStream just felt slow sometimes&#8212;in fact, on a very speedy phone, it felt incongruous in comparison to everything else, often updating with tweets quite a few minutes later than the Twitter widget did. It's not a big problem, but for someone who relies on Twitter heavily as a source of entertainment, it became a source of frustration.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-friendstream_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"><br />
<em>FriendStream</em></p>
<h2>Respectable Battery Life</h2>
<p>The Legend ran 36 hours before it died on me. Not too bad, considering I had an hour-long call plus about five shorter ones, sent and received around 20 text messages, and spent almost a whole day browsing the web, checking Twitter, and showing it off to my friends. After the horror of seeing my G1's battery deplete in half a day when I first bought it, the Legend's 1300mAh battery ran to my satisfaction.</p>
<h2>The Legend Is The Most Solid Android Phone I've Used</h2>
<p>True, other phones may be better specced, but with that premium build it's like comparing a Sony Vaio (not a bad laptop, sure) to a MacBook. Sometimes there's just no contest. While the extra horsepower and added touches of the Nexus One and Desire are nice, I found the Legend more than satisfactory.</p>
<p>It wasn't sluggish, certainly didn't have bugs or issues like the G1 and Hero, and while it'll inevitably slow down and have you cursing the fact you didn't spring for something with a Snapdragon chip, I'm going to award it possibly the highest accolade a reviewer can gift a device: I'm going to upgrade to one.</p>
<p>It's not the best Android phone. That badge still belongs to the Nexus One, or possibly the Desire, when we review it. But it's one of the best all-rounders, when you consider the hardware&#8212;and the feeling you're left with once it leaves your hand. I feel bereft without it.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizplus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Superb hardware quality</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizplus.jpg" width="20" height="20">HTC Sense is better than ever</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizplus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Addition of camera flash</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizplus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Super-fast and responsive</p>
<p><br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizminus.jpg" width="20" height="20">FriendStream could be faster<br />
<br />
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizminus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Camera flash isn't perfect</p>
<p><em>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #htclegend" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htclegend/">HTC Legend</a> hasn't been announced for the US market yet, with the European launch sometime this month.</em></p>
<p>
gawkerGallery(5488018,18,'');
</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-lead_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive"/>With HTC's upcoming crop of Androids, you'll be able to separate people into two distinct groups: those who spring for the brainier, better-specced <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5472642/htc-desire-a-premium-nexus-one-without-the-google">Desire</a>, and those who get bowled over by the beautiful, yet lesser-specced <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5472640/the-htc-legend-traps-android-21-in-unibody-aluminum">Legend</a>.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5472642/htc-desire-a-premium-nexus-one-without-the-google">Desire</a> (or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5443835/nexus-one-review">Nexus One</a>) is the final word in the Androidsphere&mdash;it's a mark of someone who knows what they're doing, who wants to show people they NEED that extra computing power. If you compare it to the Legend, you could be justified in saying Legend-salivators are more shallow, ignoring the might of a Snapdragon processor in lieu of a unibody aluminum shell and slim build.</p>
<p>You'd be wrong, however.</p>
<h1>I Mean, It Is <em>Just</em> a Sequel</h1>
<p>The internal upgrades are minor, when you consider it next to the HTC Hero, but like the Empire Strikes Back, sometimes sequels are far better than the original. While we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5318860/htc-hero-review-ambitious-but-tragically-flawed">found the Hero "tragically flawed" in its slugginess</a>, the Legend's slightly more powerful 600MHz processor behaved&mdash;well, like a legend. The 3.2-inch screen has the same amount of pixels as the Hero, but swaps the HVGA for a more superior AMOLED. The 5.0-megapixel camera is still the same quality, but has the much-welcomed addition of a flash. You get the picture&mdash;the Legend is building on the Hero's quality in incremental upgrades, but every change, however minor, radicalizes the experience of using the Legend.</p>
<p>It's running <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android21" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android21/">Android 2.1</a>, which as any Hero owner knows <em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392237/htc-hero-among-first-to-get-android-20-update">should</a></em> be released as an over-the-air update soon. One day. The jump from 1.6 to 2.1 is impressive&mdash;it's a lot faster, the multitouch is better, there's greater integration of social networking profiles with contacts, and HTML5 support, amongst other&mdash;admittedly small&mdash;changes.</p>
<h2>Design Works</h2>
<p>Plain and simple&mdash;the Legend is the most well-built phone I've ever had in my hand. You just know when you feel the weight of it, the cool curved exterior of the unibody aluminum shell, and touch the ultra-responsive touchscreen. It's that sensation when you first tenderly held the original iPhone, which has been long-missing in the market.</p>
<p>The bottom and top of the back is actually made from rubberized plastic though, so there are no issues with wireless signals&mdash;unlike the first generation of the iPhone. Removing part of the case reveals a very thin battery and a touch-sensitive catch which keeps the SIM and microSD cards encased. It's a small point, but it's also the most polished example of a phone's innards that I've ever seen.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-backcover2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive"/></p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5311754/blackberry-onyx-loses-a-trackball-gains-a-trackpad">Just like BlackBerry</a>, HTC is migrating its trackballs to optical trackpads. This is a relief, but in actual fact I barely had to use the trackpad&mdash;only when having to make an edit when typing out messages or emails. The screen is just so responsive, with nary a wrongly-actioned command made, that you can imagine HTC forgoing the trackpad altogether at a later date.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-optical-trackpad_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive"/></p>
<p>Only eight buttons reside on the Legend's body. The on/off button up top, the two volume controls on the top left, and then on the lower face, home, menu, back and search. They all worked well, though the home, menu, back and search keys did feel a bit cheap in comparison to the high-end feeling of the rest of the handset.</p>
<h2>Same Old Camera?</h2>
<p>HTC's used the same 5.0-megapixel camera as we saw on the Hero, but the addition of a flash is a new and exciting step for them&mdash;strange as that sounds. As you can see from the two photos below, the flash is very strong&mdash;too strong, I'd say. However, the quality is decent in lowlight conditions&mdash;noisy for sure, but I've seen worse.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_camera-3d-glasses.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive"/><br>
<em>My friends in lowlight at a cinema before Alice In Wonderland 3D</em></p>
<p>In daytime I had a lot more luck. Testing it out on some cakes in my kitchen in the late afternoon sun retained the nice rays of sun across the cakes, with the yellow of the flowers showing up bright. But even at 5MP, the general image performance isn't enough to ditch your point and shoot just yet.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_camera-kitchen-vertical.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive"/><br>
<em>Testing indoors with daylight</em></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-camera-on_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive"/></p>
<h2>More Sense Than HTC Sense</h2>
<p>Most manufacturers are skinning Android with their own proprietary interfaces...MOTOBLUR, Mediascape, S-Class, they're ok, but I'd almost rather use Android in its natural flavor than have to put up with some of their issues.</p>
<p>There just ain't no Android phone like a HTC Sense Android phone. It's simply the best skin an Android could ask for, even without the minor improvements seen in the Legend. By far the pick of the bunch is the new "Leap" view&mdash;or "Helicopter view" as it was known in-house when designed. It works much like Mac OS X's Exposé function, bringing all seven homescreens up as thumbnails. The feature is very useful, particularly if you just can't remember which screen your mail, or the weather widget, is listed on. The pinch command takes some getting used to, but once you've got the gesture down-pat, it's a godsend.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-helicopter_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive"/><br>
<em>Leap&mdash;or helicopter&mdash;view</em></p>
<p>But with ever feature that will be used often comes one with no point at all. FriendStream is a nice enough widget, which collates all your friends' updates from Twitter, Facebook and Flickr into one feed, but for anyone who's a purist and likes to see every form of update on each social networking site, it will be removed quickly from the homescreen. I preferred using HTC's own brilliant Twitter widget, Peep, for the full Twitter options, and the Facebook app to see every form of action. The Flickr integration is handy, being able to see when my contacts upload photos, but not necessary if you get email notifications already.</p>
<p>Plus, FriendStream just felt slow sometimes&mdash;in fact, on a very speedy phone, it felt incongruous in comparison to everything else, often updating with tweets quite a few minutes later than the Twitter widget did. It's not a big problem, but for someone who relies on Twitter heavily as a source of entertainment, it became a source of frustration.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_legend-friendstream_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive"/><br>
<em>FriendStream</em></p>
<h2>Respectable Battery Life</h2>
<p>The Legend ran 36 hours before it died on me. Not too bad, considering I had an hour-long call plus about five shorter ones, sent and received around 20 text messages, and spent almost a whole day browsing the web, checking Twitter, and showing it off to my friends. After the horror of seeing my G1's battery deplete in half a day when I first bought it, the Legend's 1300mAh battery ran to my satisfaction.</p>
<h2>The Legend Is The Most Solid Android Phone I've Used</h2>
<p>True, other phones may be better specced, but with that premium build it's like comparing a Sony Vaio (not a bad laptop, sure) to a MacBook. Sometimes there's just no contest. While the extra horsepower and added touches of the Nexus One and Desire are nice, I found the Legend more than satisfactory.</p>
<p>It wasn't sluggish, certainly didn't have bugs or issues like the G1 and Hero, and while it'll inevitably slow down and have you cursing the fact you didn't spring for something with a Snapdragon chip, I'm going to award it possibly the highest accolade a reviewer can gift a device: I'm going to upgrade to one.</p>
<p>It's not the best Android phone. That badge still belongs to the Nexus One, or possibly the Desire, when we review it. But it's one of the best all-rounders, when you consider the hardware&mdash;and the feeling you're left with once it leaves your hand. I feel bereft without it.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizplus.jpg" title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive" width="20" height="20">Superb hardware quality</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizplus.jpg" title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive" width="20" height="20">HTC Sense is better than ever</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizplus.jpg" title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive" width="20" height="20">Addition of camera flash</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizplus.jpg" title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive" width="20" height="20">Super-fast and responsive</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizminus.jpg" title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive" width="20" height="20">FriendStream could be faster<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2010/02/gizminus.jpg" title="HTC Legend Review: Frankly, It Feels Expensive" width="20" height="20">Camera flash isn't perfect</p>
<p><em>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #htclegend" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htclegend/">HTC Legend</a> hasn't been announced for the US market yet, with the European launch sometime this month.</em></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5488018,18,'');
</script></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~4/iX13aQ9wBt8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/5488019/htc-legend-review-frankly-it-feels-expensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gizmodo.com/5488019/htc-legend-review-frankly-it-feels-expensive</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner’s Plan to Make AT&amp;T Suck Less (In NY, Anyway) [IPhone]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~3/SPcTnzyj-8o/time-warners-plan-to-make-att-suck-less-in-ny-anyway</link>
		<comments>http://gizmodo.com/5488261/time-warners-plan-to-make-att-suck-less-in-ny-anyway#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matt buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5488261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/attttttt30.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_attttttt30.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>I never thought I'd forgive <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timewarner" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timewarner/">Time Warner</a> for abominable service before I switched to FiOS&#8212;but I just might, if <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-08/iphone-network-congestion-opens-market-for-time-warner-cable.html">their plan to lease their pipes to AT&#38;T and Verizon</a> makes using an iPhone in NY actually tolerable. <strong>UPDATED</strong>.</p>
<p>AT&#38;T's iPhone problems are two-fold. There's the wireless aspect, which is having enough towers with enough spectrum for everybody&#8212;that's probably what you're familiar with. (The problem in really crowded areas is that there's only so much wireless coverage you can provide before you run into issues like cross talk. We'll see how it goes down at SXSW this year, since AT&#38;T's almost certainly loaded Austin after last year's implosion. In the meantime, the FCC is pushing to get more spectrum into carriers' hands to ease congestion.)</p>
<p>The other side is backhaul&#8212;the actual pipes carrying data. I've never been able to get AT&#38;T to tell me how much of their backhaul is copper vs. fiber, which would tell us a lot about their backhaul capacity. (Fiber can carry a lot more data to and from towers than copper, obvs.) Supposedly, they're increasing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5041382/atts-internal-plans-to-fix-their-network">fiber deployments</a> alongside with their U-Verse rollouts, but I'm not sure how (or if) that's been affected by the slowdowns in U-Verse deployment. (Presumably not much, if at all.) Either way, their needs for backhaul <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5441751/okay-that-is-kind-of-a-lot-of-data">have been exploding</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Some comments from AT&#38;T about backhaul:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8226; We added more than 100,000 new circuits for backhaul last year &#8212; four times our 2008 total; we've doubled the number of fiber-served cell sites we have.<br />
&#8226; We anticipate that the majority of our mobile data traffic will be carried over the expanded fiber-based backhaul by the end of this year that we're putting in place to go with the HSPA software that's at all of our 3G cellsites already and will also be the foundation for LTE.<br />
&#8226; We'll continue to be aggressive with fiber-to-the-cell-site deployments &#8212; 3X what we did in 2009.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What Time Warner Cable's offering is more backhaul. That is, according to BusinessWeek, they're pitching Verizon and AT&#38;T on leasing their pipes in New York City, which is one of AT&#38;T's two admitted problem areas, besides SF. A short-term solution, it's cheaper for carriers than installing more backhaul themselves, but would give them additional bandwidth for data-hungry iPhones.</p>
<p>Which, incidentally, makes me real curious about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5195436/time-warner-monthly-data-caps-spread-beyond-texas">Time Warner's broadband cap trials</a> (which haven't hit NYC, yet, because of how competitive the market is, thanks to FiOS) and how they sell capacity to customers. They'd be selling unused capacity to the carriers, so their incentive would be to sell you as much bandwidth as possible for the highest price, while getting you to use as little of it as possible. Unlike Comcast, Time Warner hasn't publicly announced they'll <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5052628/comcast-opens-curtains-on-how-they-filter-your-traffic">throttle your whole connection during periods of congestion</a> (a net neutral way to manage traffic), but if they're making a side business out of selling whatever's not eaten by assholes like you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5033779/giz-explains-how-broadband-usage-caps-will-kill-internet-video">watching tons of internet video</a>, it's easy to see where the squeeze could come.</p>
<p>You will pay for your data. That's the future. But hey, at least your iPhone might work now! [<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-08/iphone-network-congestion-opens-market-for-time-warner-cable.html">BusinessWeek</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/attttttt30.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_attttttt30.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="Time Warner's Plan to Make AT&T Suck Less (In NY, Anyway)"/></a>I never thought I'd forgive <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timewarner" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timewarner/">Time Warner</a> for abominable service before I switched to FiOS&mdash;but I just might, if <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-08/iphone-network-congestion-opens-market-for-time-warner-cable.html">their plan to lease their pipes to AT&T and Verizon</a> makes using an iPhone in NY actually tolerable. <strong>UPDATED</strong>.</p>
<p>AT&T's iPhone problems are two-fold. There's the wireless aspect, which is having enough towers with enough spectrum for everybody&mdash;that's probably what you're familiar with. (The problem in really crowded areas is that there's only so much wireless coverage you can provide before you run into issues like cross talk. We'll see how it goes down at SXSW this year, since AT&T's almost certainly loaded Austin after last year's implosion. In the meantime, the FCC is pushing to get more spectrum into carriers' hands to ease congestion.)</p>
<p>The other side is backhaul&mdash;the actual pipes carrying data. I've never been able to get AT&T to tell me how much of their backhaul is copper vs. fiber, which would tell us a lot about their backhaul capacity. (Fiber can carry a lot more data to and from towers than copper, obvs.) Supposedly, they're increasing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5041382/atts-internal-plans-to-fix-their-network">fiber deployments</a> alongside with their U-Verse rollouts, but I'm not sure how (or if) that's been affected by the slowdowns in U-Verse deployment. (Presumably not much, if at all.) Either way, their needs for backhaul <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5441751/okay-that-is-kind-of-a-lot-of-data">have been exploding</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Some comments from AT&T about backhaul:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&bull; We added more than 100,000 new circuits for backhaul last year &mdash; four times our 2008 total; we've doubled the number of fiber-served cell sites we have.<br>
&bull; We anticipate that the majority of our mobile data traffic will be carried over the expanded fiber-based backhaul by the end of this year that we're putting in place to go with the HSPA software that's at all of our 3G cellsites already and will also be the foundation for LTE.<br>
&bull; We'll continue to be aggressive with fiber-to-the-cell-site deployments &mdash; 3X what we did in 2009.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What Time Warner Cable's offering is more backhaul. That is, according to BusinessWeek, they're pitching Verizon and AT&T on leasing their pipes in New York City, which is one of AT&T's two admitted problem areas, besides SF. A short-term solution, it's cheaper for carriers than installing more backhaul themselves, but would give them additional bandwidth for data-hungry iPhones.</p>
<p>Which, incidentally, makes me real curious about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5195436/time-warner-monthly-data-caps-spread-beyond-texas">Time Warner's broadband cap trials</a> (which haven't hit NYC, yet, because of how competitive the market is, thanks to FiOS) and how they sell capacity to customers. They'd be selling unused capacity to the carriers, so their incentive would be to sell you as much bandwidth as possible for the highest price, while getting you to use as little of it as possible. Unlike Comcast, Time Warner hasn't publicly announced they'll <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5052628/comcast-opens-curtains-on-how-they-filter-your-traffic">throttle your whole connection during periods of congestion</a> (a net neutral way to manage traffic), but if they're making a side business out of selling whatever's not eaten by assholes like you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5033779/giz-explains-how-broadband-usage-caps-will-kill-internet-video">watching tons of internet video</a>, it's easy to see where the squeeze could come.</p>
<p>You will pay for your data. That's the future. But hey, at least your iPhone might work now! [<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-08/iphone-network-congestion-opens-market-for-time-warner-cable.html">BusinessWeek</a>]</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~4/SPcTnzyj-8o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/5488261/time-warners-plan-to-make-att-suck-less-in-ny-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gizmodo.com/5488261/time-warners-plan-to-make-att-suck-less-in-ny-anyway</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Android-Powered Motorola Backflip Now Available at AT&amp;T [Motorola Backflip]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~3/RCJBpsCRGHw/android+powered-motorola-backflip-now-available-at-att</link>
		<comments>http://gizmodo.com/5487614/android+powered-motorola-backflip-now-available-at-att#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5487614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Normally a phone like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5483788/motorola-backflip-review-not-for-us-but-maybe-for-them">Motorola Backflip</a> wouldn't get much fanfare when it appears on a retail web site, but this is AT&#38;T's <em>first</em> Android phone (of many), so let's give it, say, 40 words or so, shall we? [<a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=Motorola+Backflip%28TM%29+-+Silver&#38;q_sku=sku4380305">AT&#38;T</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally a phone like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5483788/motorola-backflip-review-not-for-us-but-maybe-for-them">Motorola Backflip</a> wouldn't get much fanfare when it appears on a retail web site, but this is AT&T's <em>first</em> Android phone (of many), so let's give it, say, 40 words or so, shall we? [<a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=Motorola+Backflip%28TM%29+-+Silver&q_sku=sku4380305">AT&T</a>]</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~4/RCJBpsCRGHw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/5487614/android+powered-motorola-backflip-now-available-at-att/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gizmodo.com/5487614/android+powered-motorola-backflip-now-available-at-att</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Lip-Reading Cell Phones Will Be Great For Phone Six [Science]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~3/G0fllcVSbuI/lip+reading-cell-phones-will-be-great-for-phone-six</link>
		<comments>http://gizmodo.com/5486795/lip+reading-cell-phones-will-be-great-for-phone-six#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Barrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5486795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/lips.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_lips.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>German researchers are working on mobile phone technology that would convert silent mouth movements into speech. It's an ingenious way to have a noiseless conversation, but if they don't get it right there could be some unfortunate mix-ups.</p>
<p>The tech&#8212;developed at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology&#8212;involved uses electromyography, and measures the electrical potentials generated by muscle activity in the face to translate mouth movements into speech. You'd be able to speak silently, but the person on the other end of the line would hear what you were saying loud and clear.</p>
<p>Of course, lip-reading is an inexact science&#8212;even more so, I would imagine, when implemented by a machine. So while you'll be able to share PIN numbers without sharing it with the whole room, you'll want to proceed with caution on more intimate conversations. [<a href="http://www.cellular-news.com/story/42211.php">Cellular News</a> via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2010/03/read-my-lips-mo.php">Dvice</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/lips.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_lips.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="Lip-Reading Cell Phones Will Be Great For Phone Six"/></a>German researchers are working on mobile phone technology that would convert silent mouth movements into speech. It's an ingenious way to have a noiseless conversation, but if they don't get it right there could be some unfortunate mix-ups.</p>
<p>The tech&mdash;developed at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology&mdash;involved uses electromyography, and measures the electrical potentials generated by muscle activity in the face to translate mouth movements into speech. You'd be able to speak silently, but the person on the other end of the line would hear what you were saying loud and clear.</p>
<p>Of course, lip-reading is an inexact science&mdash;even more so, I would imagine, when implemented by a machine. So while you'll be able to share PIN numbers without sharing it with the whole room, you'll want to proceed with caution on more intimate conversations. [<a href="http://www.cellular-news.com/story/42211.php">Cellular News</a> via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2010/03/read-my-lips-mo.php">Dvice</a>]</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~4/G0fllcVSbuI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/5486795/lip+reading-cell-phones-will-be-great-for-phone-six/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gizmodo.com/5486795/lip+reading-cell-phones-will-be-great-for-phone-six</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC: Don’t Carry Your Nexus One In Your Pocket [Nexus One]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~3/DVP-mQkBHh0/htc-dont-carry-your-nexus-one-in-your-pocket</link>
		<comments>http://gizmodo.com/5486397/htc-dont-carry-your-nexus-one-in-your-pocket#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Hannaford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5486397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_nexus-one-screen.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">This isn't a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nexusone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nexusone/">Nexus One</a> celebrating Gay Pride month&#8212;it's <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/0,39029453,49305156,00.htm?s_cid=96">CNET Crave UK's broken Google phone</a>. According to HTC's technical support, "they don't go in pockets," lest the screen gets cracked.</p>
<p>Only thing is, Crave UK swears up and down the Nexus One suffered the damages while charging on a desk&#8212;with no tampering by vicious iPhone users recorded. After being recommended by Google to speak to HTC's technical support, Crave was told that "putting a phone in a tight pair of jeans and sitting down would usually cause the kind of damage," and that "people sometimes forget that they don't go in pockets." Say what?</p>
<p>Here's the second stinging lash&#8212;the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #crackedscreen" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/crackedscreen/">cracked screen</a> will cost £180 to fix. That's $270, or $100 more than the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5444350/googles-nexus-one-costs-17415">whole phone's parts cost, according to iSuppli</a>. Yeouch. [<a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/0,39029453,49305156,00.htm?s_cid=96">Crave UK</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_nexus-one-screen.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="HTC: Don't Carry Your Nexus One In Your Pocket"/>This isn't a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nexusone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nexusone/">Nexus One</a> celebrating Gay Pride month&mdash;it's <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/0,39029453,49305156,00.htm?s_cid=96">CNET Crave UK's broken Google phone</a>. According to HTC's technical support, "they don't go in pockets," lest the screen gets cracked.</p>
<p>Only thing is, Crave UK swears up and down the Nexus One suffered the damages while charging on a desk&mdash;with no tampering by vicious iPhone users recorded. After being recommended by Google to speak to HTC's technical support, Crave was told that "putting a phone in a tight pair of jeans and sitting down would usually cause the kind of damage," and that "people sometimes forget that they don't go in pockets." Say what?</p>
<p>Here's the second stinging lash&mdash;the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #crackedscreen" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/crackedscreen/">cracked screen</a> will cost £180 to fix. That's $270, or $100 more than the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5444350/googles-nexus-one-costs-17415">whole phone's parts cost, according to iSuppli</a>. Yeouch. [<a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/0,39029453,49305156,00.htm?s_cid=96">Crave UK</a>]</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~4/DVP-mQkBHh0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/5486397/htc-dont-carry-your-nexus-one-in-your-pocket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gizmodo.com/5486397/htc-dont-carry-your-nexus-one-in-your-pocket</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC Incredible Photos Appear On Twitter, Showing…Not Much, Actually [Android]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~3/rLO39oduvT4/htc-incredible-photos-appear-on-twitter-showingnot-much-actually</link>
		<comments>http://gizmodo.com/5486346/htc-incredible-photos-appear-on-twitter-showingnot-much-actually#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Hannaford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5486346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/340x_htc-incredible1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340">Waking up to fresh photos of an unofficial phone is always welcome, but I do wish all these spyshots of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5479895/htc-incredible-turns-up-on-verizon-wireless-system-implying-launch-is-near">HTC Incredible</a> would be accompanied with a bit of meat. Some bacon for my breakfast, you could say.</p>
<p>It's already <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5479895/htc-incredible-turns-up-on-verizon-wireless-system-implying-launch-is-near">shown up in Verizon Wireless' inventory system</a>, and we've heard a few details on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5466195/htc-incredible-photos-leaked-reveal-incredibly-brown-back-plate">inner workings of the handset</a>&#8212;but as to when it's expected to go on sale, why don't you tell me, eh punk? [<a href="http://twitter.com/DevDroid">DevDroid</a> via <a href="http://www.androidcentral.com/new-pics-htc-incredible-surface-twitter">AndroidCentral</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_htc-incredible2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/340x_htc-incredible1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  title="HTC Incredible Photos Appear On Twitter, Showing...Not Much, Actually"/>Waking up to fresh photos of an unofficial phone is always welcome, but I do wish all these spyshots of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5479895/htc-incredible-turns-up-on-verizon-wireless-system-implying-launch-is-near">HTC Incredible</a> would be accompanied with a bit of meat. Some bacon for my breakfast, you could say.</p>
<p>It's already <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5479895/htc-incredible-turns-up-on-verizon-wireless-system-implying-launch-is-near">shown up in Verizon Wireless' inventory system</a>, and we've heard a few details on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5466195/htc-incredible-photos-leaked-reveal-incredibly-brown-back-plate">inner workings of the handset</a>&mdash;but as to when it's expected to go on sale, why don't you tell me, eh punk? [<a href="http://twitter.com/DevDroid">DevDroid</a> via <a href="http://www.androidcentral.com/new-pics-htc-incredible-surface-twitter">AndroidCentral</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_htc-incredible2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="HTC Incredible Photos Appear On Twitter, Showing...Not Much, Actually"/></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~4/rLO39oduvT4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/5486346/htc-incredible-photos-appear-on-twitter-showingnot-much-actually/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gizmodo.com/5486346/htc-incredible-photos-appear-on-twitter-showingnot-much-actually</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>First Shots and Specs of Microsoft’s Secret Project Pink Phone [Exclusive]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~3/Z-z7zgSy-NI/first-shots-and-specs-of-microsofts-secret-project-pink-phone</link>
		<comments>http://gizmodo.com/5485796/first-shots-and-specs-of-microsofts-secret-project-pink-phone#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5485796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/pinkpure_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_pinkpure_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>These are the first photos of Microsoft's Project Pink phones, snatched from deep within the bowels of the Microsoft/Verizon industrio-complex &#8212;not the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5485554/leaked-documents-microsofts-secret-phones-coming-to-verizon-update-in-april">Turtle</a>, but the larger, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5366263/the-pink-phone-pictures-microsoft-doesnt-want-you-to-see-yet">Sidekick-like Pure</a>. This doesn't <em>look</em> like Windows Phone 7, so what is it?</p><p>The shots come just hours after a leaked <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5485554/leaked-documents-microsofts-secret-phones-coming-to-verizon-update-in-april">advertising campaign</a> for the Turtle outed Verizon as a carrier for the Pink Turtle, without so much as a mention of the Pure.</p>
<p>Our tipster confirms the Pure is also headed to Verizon, but doesn't have a release date. (Though it's hard to imagine the release date would fall too far out of line with the Turtle, which is expected to hit stores at the end of April. <i>Business Week</i>'s claim that the release will be May or June of this year supports this.) Anyway, <em>this thing</em>: It's strange! It's got a paneled interface, with fixed squares for everything from music (with Zune typography) and email to RSS feeds and what looks like a unified social networking hub. As hinted earlier, the aesthetic is similar Windows Phone 7, but the software is distinctly <em>not</em> Windows Phone 7. This looks like Windows Phone 7: Feature Phone edition.<br />
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/pink2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_pink2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Our source got a few seconds to use the Pure, and said it was intuitive, "better than Android," and decorated with Windows Phone 7-style animations throughout. That said, the app situation still doesn't add up. There's apparently an download screen for new apps, but it's not populated with anything yet. This could mean two things: Either the Pink phones will tap into the Windows Phone 7 marketplace somehow, which would be great (but also <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5485554/leaked-documents-microsofts-secret-phones-coming-to-verizon-update-in-april">doesn't make sense</a>), or they'll have apps like the Zune has apps&#8212;which is to say, only sort of, and only from selected partners.</p>
<p>The more we see, the more the Pure and Turtle look like they're stacking up to be Zune-ified followups to the Sidekick. It's an interesting move, but who does Microsoft think they're going to sell this thing to? Tweens?</p>
<h2>Update: Firmware Leak</h2>
<p>We've got our hands on leaked Pink firmware, and we've dumped all the icons and photos we could extract. Sadly, there's not way to run this right now, but we can see a lot of what's shown above, like the homescreen application icons, in full resolution. There are also traces of Zune, as well as Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, and Windows Live. There are some shots (discovered by <a href="http://twitter.com/conflipper">someone else</a> who's got the firmware) that show a lockscreen dialer, but these are likely placeholders of some sort. Also tucked away in the firmware are default wallpapers for both phones, in their rumored resolutions. Finally, we've got a shot from the Turtle's unremarkable camera, which appears to have flash.</p>
<p>(Filenames included in the gallery, because they're pretty descriptive.)</p>
<p>
gawkerGallery(5485883,4,'');
</p>
<p>Here's what we can glean from the dump so far:</p>
<p>• The carrier is definitely Verizon, though there are references in the firmware to AT&#38;T and T-Mobile in the US (which are probably placeholders, since the rest of the evidence points to CDMA radios as standard for these phones.) There are also references to a wide range of foreign carriers in the UK, mainland Europe and Asia, but again, most of these carriers don't support what looks like the initial version of the handset's CDMA hardware, as far as I can tell.</p>
<p>• The OS is based on Windows CE, like the Zune and Windows Phone 7. This doesn't mean a ton to users, but the guy who passed us the firmware sums up what that means under the hood:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Everything is programed in .NET a lot like 7 is. It does not say it inside the files where I have seen, but It is coded in XAMl and is in the structure that CE 7 is supposed to be structured, it is my belief that it will be based off CE 7, and it will have a lot of tie in to Windows Live as well.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>• Turtle and Pure codenames are used in the firmware, but that doesn't mean that those'll be the shipping names for the product. There are also codenames for the "Pride" and "Lion" handsets, which appear to just be the international versions of the Turtle and Pure, respectively.</p>
<p>• The Turtle's screen is 320x240, while the Pure's is 480x320&#8212;the same as the iPhone.</p>
<p>• There are reference to something called "The Loop," which sounds like some kind of central social networking hub.</p>
<p>We're powering through the firmware dump now, so we'll post more as we get it. [Special thanks to our tipsters, and <a href="http://twitter.com/conflipper">Conflipper</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/pinkpure_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_pinkpure_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="First Shots and Specs of Microsoft's Secret Project Pink Phone"/></a>These are the first photos of Microsoft's Project Pink phones, snatched from deep within the bowels of the Microsoft/Verizon industrio-complex &mdash;not the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5485554/leaked-documents-microsofts-secret-phones-coming-to-verizon-update-in-april">Turtle</a>, but the larger, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5366263/the-pink-phone-pictures-microsoft-doesnt-want-you-to-see-yet">Sidekick-like Pure</a>. This doesn't <em>look</em> like Windows Phone 7, so what is it?</p><p>The shots come just hours after a leaked <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5485554/leaked-documents-microsofts-secret-phones-coming-to-verizon-update-in-april">advertising campaign</a> for the Turtle outed Verizon as a carrier for the Pink Turtle, without so much as a mention of the Pure.</p>
<p>Our tipster confirms the Pure is also headed to Verizon, but doesn't have a release date. (Though it's hard to imagine the release date would fall too far out of line with the Turtle, which is expected to hit stores at the end of April. <i>Business Week</i>'s claim that the release will be May or June of this year supports this.) Anyway, <em>this thing</em>: It's strange! It's got a paneled interface, with fixed squares for everything from music (with Zune typography) and email to RSS feeds and what looks like a unified social networking hub. As hinted earlier, the aesthetic is similar Windows Phone 7, but the software is distinctly <em>not</em> Windows Phone 7. This looks like Windows Phone 7: Feature Phone edition.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/pink2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_pink2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="First Shots and Specs of Microsoft's Secret Project Pink Phone"/></a>Our source got a few seconds to use the Pure, and said it was intuitive, "better than Android," and decorated with Windows Phone 7-style animations throughout. That said, the app situation still doesn't add up. There's apparently an download screen for new apps, but it's not populated with anything yet. This could mean two things: Either the Pink phones will tap into the Windows Phone 7 marketplace somehow, which would be great (but also <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5485554/leaked-documents-microsofts-secret-phones-coming-to-verizon-update-in-april">doesn't make sense</a>), or they'll have apps like the Zune has apps&mdash;which is to say, only sort of, and only from selected partners.</p>
<p>The more we see, the more the Pure and Turtle look like they're stacking up to be Zune-ified followups to the Sidekick. It's an interesting move, but who does Microsoft think they're going to sell this thing to? Tweens?</p>
<h2>Update: Firmware Leak</h2>
<p>We've got our hands on leaked Pink firmware, and we've dumped all the icons and photos we could extract. Sadly, there's not way to run this right now, but we can see a lot of what's shown above, like the homescreen application icons, in full resolution. There are also traces of Zune, as well as Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, and Windows Live. There are some shots (discovered by <a href="http://twitter.com/conflipper">someone else</a> who's got the firmware) that show a lockscreen dialer, but these are likely placeholders of some sort. Also tucked away in the firmware are default wallpapers for both phones, in their rumored resolutions. Finally, we've got a shot from the Turtle's unremarkable camera, which appears to have flash.</p>
<p>(Filenames included in the gallery, because they're pretty descriptive.)</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5485883,4,'');
</script></p>
<p>Here's what we can glean from the dump so far:</p>
<p>• The carrier is definitely Verizon, though there are references in the firmware to AT&T and T-Mobile in the US (which are probably placeholders, since the rest of the evidence points to CDMA radios as standard for these phones.) There are also references to a wide range of foreign carriers in the UK, mainland Europe and Asia, but again, most of these carriers don't support what looks like the initial version of the handset's CDMA hardware, as far as I can tell.</p>
<p>• The OS is based on Windows CE, like the Zune and Windows Phone 7. This doesn't mean a ton to users, but the guy who passed us the firmware sums up what that means under the hood:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Everything is programed in .NET a lot like 7 is. It does not say it inside the files where I have seen, but It is coded in XAMl and is in the structure that CE 7 is supposed to be structured, it is my belief that it will be based off CE 7, and it will have a lot of tie in to Windows Live as well.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>• Turtle and Pure codenames are used in the firmware, but that doesn't mean that those'll be the shipping names for the product. There are also codenames for the "Pride" and "Lion" handsets, which appear to just be the international versions of the Turtle and Pure, respectively.</p>
<p>• The Turtle's screen is 320x240, while the Pure's is 480x320&mdash;the same as the iPhone.</p>
<p>• There are reference to something called "The Loop," which sounds like some kind of central social networking hub.</p>
<p>We're powering through the firmware dump now, so we'll post more as we get it. [Special thanks to our tipsters, and <a href="http://twitter.com/conflipper">Conflipper</a>]</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~4/Z-z7zgSy-NI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/5485796/first-shots-and-specs-of-microsofts-secret-project-pink-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gizmodo.com/5485796/first-shots-and-specs-of-microsofts-secret-project-pink-phone</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>LG’s First Windows Phone 7 Handset Will Be Called Panther? [Windows Phone 7 Series]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~3/8R__m1xCMTk/lgs-first-windows-phone-7-handset-will-be-called-panther</link>
		<comments>http://gizmodo.com/5485499/lgs-first-windows-phone-7-handset-will-be-called-panther#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Hannaford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">Gizmodo-5485499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_lg-phone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">LG's first <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsphone7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsphone7/">Windows Phone 7</a> handset, which got <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5481938/microsoft-employee-shows-off-prototype-windows-phone-7-series-smartphone-from-lg">shown off</a> recently in the sweaty palm of a Microsoft director at the Engadget Show, will be called the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lgpanther" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lgpanther/">LG Panther</a>. Apparently. We know LG likes silly names, but Panther?</p>
<p>Of course, there's a more famous Panther in our world&#8212;2003's OS X 10.3, from Apple. The rumored names comes via the UK site <a href="http://www.blog.best-mobile-contracts.co.uk/2010/03/lg-phones/wp7-device-lg-panther.html">Best Mobile Contracts</a>, which we've never heard of so can't vouch for how solid this rumor is&#8212;but after Cookie, Viewty, and whatever else they've managed to slip past their marketing team, Panther is hardly the least-flattering if indeed that's what LG names it. [<a href="http://www.blog.best-mobile-contracts.co.uk/2010/03/lg-phones/wp7-device-lg-panther.html">Best Mobile Contracts</a> via <a href="http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=13885">WMPowerUser</a> via <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/first-windows-phone-7-device-to-be-called-lg-panther--674612">TechRadar</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_lg-phone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  title="LG's First Windows Phone 7 Handset Will Be Called Panther?"/>LG's first <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsphone7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsphone7/">Windows Phone 7</a> handset, which got <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5481938/microsoft-employee-shows-off-prototype-windows-phone-7-series-smartphone-from-lg">shown off</a> recently in the sweaty palm of a Microsoft director at the Engadget Show, will be called the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lgpanther" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lgpanther/">LG Panther</a>. Apparently. We know LG likes silly names, but Panther?</p>
<p>Of course, there's a more famous Panther in our world&mdash;2003's OS X 10.3, from Apple. The rumored names comes via the UK site <a href="http://www.blog.best-mobile-contracts.co.uk/2010/03/lg-phones/wp7-device-lg-panther.html">Best Mobile Contracts</a>, which we've never heard of so can't vouch for how solid this rumor is&mdash;but after Cookie, Viewty, and whatever else they've managed to slip past their marketing team, Panther is hardly the least-flattering if indeed that's what LG names it. [<a href="http://www.blog.best-mobile-contracts.co.uk/2010/03/lg-phones/wp7-device-lg-panther.html">Best Mobile Contracts</a> via <a href="http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=13885">WMPowerUser</a> via <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/first-windows-phone-7-device-to-be-called-lg-panther--674612">TechRadar</a>]</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PhoneJunkie/~4/8R__m1xCMTk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/5485499/lgs-first-windows-phone-7-handset-will-be-called-panther/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://gizmodo.com/5485499/lgs-first-windows-phone-7-handset-will-be-called-panther</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 10.222 seconds --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-09 18:29:43 --><!-- Compression = gzip -->
