I love that the concept of social networks and fundraising has the ability to translate beyond the bounds of charities and non-profits (which are obviously important), and help foster creativity and innovation and other under-funded pursuits.

The social web allows entrepreneurs, non-profits and ambitious individuals (often-times students) greater access to a wide range of potential donors.  We’ve seen sits like Kiva take off in recent years – allowing donors to provide micro-loans to fund small businesses in developing countries.  Closer to home, donors can help a student pay off their loans or help a friend save money for a trip.

Individuals, like Drew, have created movements through the use of sites like Twitter (just search for #blamedrewscancer), and major corporations have backed similar projects- equating mentions (awareness raising) to matched funds (#beatcancer is another).

One of my favorite examples is American Express’s Members Project, which allowed members to submit charities and projects needing funds, and vote on the most worthy causes.  American Express donated $1 million dollars to the cause with the most votes.  This concept has sparked others, such Target’s Bullseye Gives program, hosted through Facebook.

All of these opportunities- community based, often event-driven- succeed because they put faces to issues.  Through these social platforms, donors can track progress, follow the people they are helping, feel ownership though voting and promotions, and ultimately feel connected enough to continue the cycle of giving.

MWW Pulse is a social media destination for readers who want insights from top online influencers in important categories, including: Environmental and Sustainability, Health and Wellness, Consumer Technology and Personal Finance. Several times a year each panel will be asked to provide commentary, analysis and opinion on provocative subject matter – similar to what they’re already doing on their own blogs — for the MWW Pulse site. The program kicks off today with blog posts from a panel of Environmental & Sustainability bloggers, including Jasmin Malik Chua from Inhabitot and Ecouterre, Adam Shake from Twilight Earth, Maureen O’Connor from The Alternative Consumer, Stephen Del Percio from GreenbuildingsNYC and Janet Dean from the GreenMomReview.

We know that by enlisting some of the best minds on important topics we can facilitate an energetic dialogue resulting in breakthrough ideas, solutions and thinking – a win, win for the community, for our clients and for the panelists involved. Also, by MWW Group facilitating these discussions, we hope to learn a great deal from the collective knowledge of the panel, and ensure our clients follow the best practices that are often discussed in such forums. These panels will become a source for energetic discussions surrounding these topics and our panelists become a go-to source of commentary for media outlets ranging from broadcast news, print feature pieces and other blogs.

Want to Promote a Real Time Event?

Chris Brogan has some wise words for those in need of advice.  They include building a webpage or using Eventbrite for single events, use of other events announcement websites, and other social media platforms.

Mobile Web is on the Verge of Greatness

This will be a significant trend for the next year with an explosion of smartphones to be available across all carriers.  Wordpress, the popular blogging platform, released a mobile web optimized theme suggesting user generated content will be a significant player in the field.

Success in Social Media for Small Businesses

Here are five examples of some great social media use by small businesses.  They involve 2 restaurants, one of the oldest cinemas in the UK, worm composters and active wear.  Do check them out.

Some detail about the jobs are below.  To submit a resume, please reach out to us at jobs at mww.com, or you can reach me directly with questions.

Across the board, we are looking for team members who are highly motivated, can work across multiple clients, are curious, enthusiastic and eager to apply their social media smarts to help us reach our client goals.

Digital Strategist (SAE-AS Level):  We are looking for someone who can develop effective social media programs on behalf of clients and assure they are managed to meet our agency’s “Aim high. Deliver” motto.  We are looking for a self-starter who thinks above and beyond what is asked, someone who can participate strategically in new business initiatives and who can provide training and development internally.

Digital Coordinator (AC-AE Level):  This person should have experience with a range of social media tools and platforms, stong communication skills, and the ability to think strategically and proactively.  This is a supporting role across a variety of clients, with lots of room to learn and grow.

We’re looking forward to hearing from you!

(Photo courtesy of Steve Rhodes)

• The Internet Advertising Bureau has come out against the recent FTC guidelines. The IAB argues that new rules unfairly regulate the online media more than offline.

• In other FTC guideline news, one service called CMP.ly is attempting to establish a standard format for all disclosures by using their 6 different disclosure links.  For more on CMP.ly make sure to check out PRNewser’s recent interview with the co-founder, Tom Chernaik.
• The Official Google blog shares tips on Managing Your Reputation through Search Results. The first idea? Make sure you want your personal info online.
• Finally, as the fervor around the Balloon Boy continues to swell as the “it” viral discussion of the moment, make sure to take the time to check out such gem’s as the T-shirt, the Fresh Prince Rap and of course this stunning re-enactment (See below).

In general, I think companies have grown used to an idea that a hit in the New York Times or Oprah can radically change the ROI, but that’s not necessarily true for social media. Social media, while very fast in nature, can take time when it comes to building relationships and trust. You can create a Twitter account in less than a minute, and you can follow a hundred people in about 10 minutes, but does that mean you’ll become the next Ashton Kutcher? A blogger, Twitter or Facebook campaign can lead to a lot of eyeballs on your pages, but the true test of a successful social media campaign is how many people came back? A company may launch a Facebook page, but getting fans can take time because there’s more follow-through required.

Patience is key when evaluating your social media program. Many clients may get frustrated that they aren’t getting hundreds of followers or fans every day. It’s important to keep working on new, innovative ways to give fans something to do, something to read, a way to interact with the brand that shows them why they should take the time to get involved with a brand. Then, be patient.

• “Network Marketers”: the guidelines state that “participants in network marketing programs are also likely to be deemed to have material connection that warrant disclosure.”  So if you are a BuzzAgent or a brand working with a similar program, disclosure and liability guidelines apply as they do to bloggers.
• Celebrities are considered liable for comments they make in advertisements – but importantly for PR people – also for what they say in editorial content.  So celebrities being paid to talk about a product on a talk show, will be required to disclose their relationship with the brand.
• Employees: disclosure is required when employees of a company comment publicly about a product or service (the Guidelines use the example of a message board post).  What was previously best practices, seems now to be a requirement, making employee policies and guidelines even more important.

At the end of the day, the guidelines require that endorsers 1) disclose their relationship with marketers and advertisers, and 2) are accountable for the truth and accuracy of their comments.  This presents some basic considerations for us as marketers.  Although disclosure about compensation is certainly not a new issue in the marketing world, there is now an added (financial) incentive to ensure that this is done consistently and ethically.  The basics:

• Proactive Disclosure: Individuals who receive compensation (money/free product) in exchange for talking about personal experiences need to clearly and consistently disclose their relationship with the marketer (on the web, this should be done each time a new reference is made).  It also means that as a marketer, we are responsible for setting up disclosure expectations for the programs we run – including include the proper way to disclose within the context of a blog as well as in 140 characters, or as part of a YouTube video.
• Guidelines and Recommendations: Especially with network marketing programs, when “endorsers” don’t necessarily consider themselves marketers, setting up recommended disclosure language and the parameters for reviews and endorsements will be important  (i.e. stick to your personal experiences rather than making broad-generalizations about a product, be honest, etc.).  In the same way, guidelines for employees who are talking about their companies’ products or services will be important too.
• Monitoring: Part of the guidelines states that “if the advertiser initiated the process that led to these endorsements being made … it potentially is liable for misleading statements made by those consumers.” With that in mind, it is not enough to simply disseminate free product and close your ears (not that this is advisable anyway).  Brands will be responsible for tracking mentions and reviews by these influencers and potentially reaching out to correct or clarify mis-information.

All in all, these are best practices brands should be following anyway – and these guidelines are a step in the right direction.  We’re following along as brands and marketers adopt these new guidelines, and will be tracking new developments as they come.

As we reported on Monday, the Federal Trade Commission updated their compliance guidelines for the FTC Act, the first such update in 29 years.  While the changes do affect a few outdated rules the main goal of the document was to cleanly define what bloggers can and can’t do online.  The guidelines state:

The revised Guides also add new examples to illustrate the long standing principle that “material connections” (sometimes payments or free products) between advertisers and endorsers – connections that consumers would not expect – must be disclosed. These examples address what constitutes an endorsement when the message is conveyed by bloggers or other “word-of-mouth” marketers. The revised Guides specify that while decisions will be reached on a case-by-case basis, the post of a blogger who receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product is considered an endorsement. Thus, bloggers who make an endorsement must disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service.

The need for these rules is clear and somewhat past due. As marketing becomes more conversation oriented, we need to protect consumers from unfair and unethical claims.  It is why we believe in transparency and the Blog with Integrity movement. Unfortunately I’m hesitant to embrace the guidelines as fully as blogs like Mashable have done. Specifically, I’m having trouble with three big issues:

1. Scope- The term blogger is being used very loosely here.  Under these guidelines blogs, Twitter, even Facebook fan pages could be under the discretion of the FTC. While I understand the need to tackle many web properties at once (since updates are infrequent), I don’t know if the best way to lump everyone in together.  Considering that anything that is considered a “material connection” could be scrutinized, how is everyone supposed to comply? How many people even know about these guidelines in the first place? And where do rating sites like Amazon or Yelp fit into all of this?
2. A Double Standard? –  Why are bloggers being singled out? As Jeff Jarvis points out, “The FTC also concedes that it treats critics at publications differently – less stringently – than bloggers.” Most bloggers don’t consider themselves journalists and don’t make their living reviewing things like some journalists do, but why compound the point and have two sets of rules. It just doesn’t make sense.
3. Enforcement- Eleven thousand dollars is a lot of money to most people and makes it seem like the FTC might be the “new” RIAA. Some fines will be covered by brands, but considering that these fines will be judged on a “case by case” basis, it is hard to guess where the first strike will land. Will a Twitter mention receive the same discretion as a blog post? Will the little guy get hit with large fines as much as the big fish?   With the FTC ‘s Richard Cleland telling book blogs to return books after reviews, how much will people need to disclose to avoid a potential fine? As much as this guy?

I think that the new guidelines are clearly a step in the right direction. With some additional edits and clarifications, this document could protect many consumers without hurting the online conversation.  However considering that this is the first update in almost 30 years, I think that the FTC should re-evaluate how their perception on how social media works.  Who knows maybe at the next update in 2038, we will see some real progress!

What do you think of the recent guidelines? Will it change how you blog?

Photo Courtsey of Robyn Gallagher.

As mentioned previously here on OTD, ethics, endorsements and disclosure has been a hot button topic for some time now and we are finally moving towards having  this standardized set of rules when it comes to disclosing brand involvement and compensation. Communication professionals  and bloggers alike have been taking measures and declaring publicly that a change needs to be made to combat these deceptive practices.

Hopefully an $11,000 price tag will help promote more positive and ethical behavior among the industry.