Modifier 25

Preventative care pays. 99401 and others

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:58:00 +0000

Did you know that you can get paid for doing the preventative care? You can.

In the CPT book it is called Counseling Risk Factor Reduction and Behavior Change Intervention.

This is a distinct set of codes from the traditional E and M services and can be billed IN addition to the E and M services you provide.

That means, no modifier 25.

The catch?

1. You have to document how much time you spend in preventative care. 99401 is 15 minutes of care.

2. You have to ICD9 code using a V code or a diagnosis code for the preventative care you are providing. Which means on Diagnosis Pointers on the HCFA form, you have to list a pointer.

3. You have to understand preventive medicine counseling and risk factor reduction interventions provided as a separate encounter will vary with age and should address such issues as family problems, diet and exercise, substance abuse, sexual practices, injury prevention, dental health and diagnostic and laboratory test results available at the time of the encounter.

What does this mean? It means that you get paid for performing preventative care. Something you should be doing just about every appointment.

If you are looking on the AAPC listserv it seems that NO ONE is using these codes.

Why not? If you are providing primary preventative care.
i.e. Use condoms, buckle up, adjust water temp, lift with your legs, lose weight
Then you should get paid for these additional preventative services.

The breakdown-
99401 is for 15 minutes of preventative care
99402 is for 30 minutes of preventative care
99403 is for 45 minutes of preventative care
99404 is for 60 minutes of preventative care

So, document what you do and then go ahead and bill for these important code. Remember, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure and some insurers pay that way.

"Face-to-Face" in outpatient E/M does not exclude video chat

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:20:00 +0000

Video chat medical consultations are coded as Evaluation and Management (E/M) "Office or Other Outpatient Services" (99201 to 99215) ---just like any other outpatient consultation, no special code needed.

So?

Video chat medical consultations can be provided to patients as a new service without changes to existing medical insurance billing practices. Video chat also has the benefit that it is recorded, replayed, and shared with perfect fidelity. Video does not replace physical consultation, but it does efficiently distribute and triage limited medical consultation resources worldwide while automatically documenting medical events electronically.

Why?

The E/M criteria for "office and other outpatient visits and office consultations" includes "face-to-face" patient interaction defined by the AMA as "time that the physician spends face-to-face with the patient and/or family. This includes the time in which the physician performs such tasks as obtaining history, performing an examination, and counseling patients." ("CPT 2009" pg. 5) This constraint contrasts with the "unit / floor time" criteria used for E/M hospital coding, which by noting a physical location, is actually more constraining physically than outpatient CPT coding which does not specify any physical proximity ---only "face to face."

Clearly, video chat is "face-to-face." If it were not, then what is the purpose of the "video" in "video chat"?

However, outpatient E/M codes 99201 to 99215 do explicitly exclude "communicating further with other professionals and the patient through written reports and telephone contact." That is, voice and written communication without the "face-to-face" real-time visual contact ---the video--- does not qualify.

Objections

Because video chat is "electronic," some believe video chat should be coded as 99444. No! According the AMA definition for 99444, video chat cannot be coded as a 99444 because:

FAIL 1) "non-face-to-face" Video is face to face.

FAIL 2) "physician's personal timely response to the patient's inquiry" Video is face-to-face consultation, not a delayed response to recorded inquiry, as implied by "timely response"

FAIL 3) "this service is reported only once for the same episode of care during a seven-day period" 99444 is an asynchronous exchange of messages, as implied by "during a seven-day period. Video is synchronous, and each "event" is a uniquely submitted "episode of care."

99444 is clearly for web forum and email threads, not video (FAIL 1: face-to-face), not chat (FAIL 3: sync), and not voice (FAIL 2: immediate response, FAIL 3: sync).

Also, some believe that a physical examination is necessary to code outpatient E/M events. This is also a myth. The AMA CPT code book has no qualification explicitly requiring tactile examination to qualify "extent of examination." The only coding qualifications specified are:

- clinical judgment
- nature of presenting problem
- quantity of organ systems / body areas examined

Thus, the limiting qualification is the clinical necessity for physical contact, which is what it should be. If the patient needs to visit the office, the patient needs to visit the office. If not, then not. Not sufficiently examining as clinically indicated is already known as "not doing your job," and inflating a clinical note is already known as "lying." There's no need for a special qualification just because the doctor uses new, better tools.

But yes, in practice, video will probably be coded lower on average than physical examinations ---all else equal--- because the provider will be unable to physically interact with the patient. However, for many routine medical consults, physical interaction is clinically unnecessary unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Same Day Service Inpatient Observation is it a 99236?

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:12:00 +0000

Today I cared for a patient and performed a monitored test on them. I wondered what exactly I should code for this encounter. Then I turned to trust ol CPT 2009......

There are 3 codes for Observation admission and discharge of a patient in the same day. these are 99234, 99235 and 99236.

The inpatient and outpatient E and M codes all have the same format. New Patient? You must meet all 3 criteria. In this case it all admitted patients are considered new patients in house....

So these criteria are very similar to outpatient encounters.

The 99236 requires:

1. Comprehensive history
2. Comprehensive Examination
3. Medical decision Making of High Complexity

The Comprehensive history is:
1. A chief complaint
2. An extended HPI (four HPI elements OR the status of three chronic or inactive probs.
3. A 10 system ROS
4. A Complete PFSH. Which includes Meds, Allergies, FamHx, SrgHx, MedHx
Remember it only takes on element from each category of the PFSH to qualify as complete.

The Comprehensive Examination is 2 points from 9 organ systems. Are you telling me you forgot the systems?

FYE
Constitutional

1) Three vital signs
2) General appearance

Eyes

1) Inspection of conjunctivae and lids
2) Examination of pupils and irises (PERRLA)
3) Ophthalmoscopic discs and posterior segments

Ears, Nose, Mouth, and Throat

1) External appearance of the ears and nose (overall appearance, scars, lesions, masses)
2) Otoscopic examination of the external auditory canals and tympanic membranes
3) Assessment of hearing
4) Inspection of nasal mucosa, septum and turbinates
5) Inspection of lips, teeth and gums
6) Examination of oropharynx: oral mucosa, salivary glands, hard and soft palates, tongue, tonsils and posterior pharynx

Neck

1) Examination of neck (e.g., masses, overall appearance, symmetry, tracheal position, crepitus)
2) Examination of thyroid

Respiratory

1) Assessment of respiratory effort (e.g., intercostal retractions, use of accessory muscles, diaphragmatic movement)
2) Percussion of chest (e.g., dullness, flatness, hyperresonance)
3) Palpation of chest (e.g., tactile fremitus)
4) Auscultation of the lungs

Cardiovascular

1) Palpation of the heart (location, size, thrills)
2) Auscultation of the heart with notation of abnormal sounds and murmurs
3) Assessment of lower extremities for edema and/or varicosities
4) Examination of the carotid arteries (e.g., pulse amplitude, bruits)
5) Examination of abdominal aorta (e.g., size, bruits)
6) Examination of the femoral arteries (e.g., pulse amplitude, bruits)
7) Examination of the pedal pulses (e.g., pulse amplitude)

Chest (Breasts)

1) Inspection of the breasts (e.g., symmetry, nipple discharge)
2) Palpation of the breasts and axillae (e.g., masses, lumps, tenderness)

Gastrointestinal (Abdomen)

1) Examination of the abdomen with notation of presence of masses or tenderness
2) Examination of the liver and spleen
3) Examination for the presence or absence of hernias
4) Examination (when indicated) of anus, perineum, and rectum, including sphincter tone, presence of hemorrhoids,
rectal masses
5) Obtain stool for occult blood testing when indicated

Genitourinary (Male)

1) Examination of the scrotal contents (e.g., hydrocoele, spermatocoele, tenderness of cord, testicular mass)
2) Examination of the penis
1) Digital rectal examination of the prostate gland (e.g., size, symmetry, nodularity, tenderness)

Genitourinary (Female)

Pelvic examination (with or without specimen collection for smears and cultures, which may include:

1) Examination of the external genitalia (e.g., general appearance, hair distribution, lesions)
2) Examination of the urethra (e.g., masses, tenderness, scarring)
3) Examination of the bladder (e.g., fullness, masses, tenderness)
4) Examination of the cervix (e.g., general appearance, discharge, lesions)
5) Examination of the uterus (e.g., size, contour, position, mobility, tenderness, consistency, descent or support)
6) Examination of the adnexa/parametria (e.g., masses, tenderness, organomegaly, nodularity)

Lymphatic

Palpation of lymph nodes two or more areas:

1) Neck
2) Axillae
3) Groin
4) Other

Musculoskeletal

1) Examination of gait and station
2) Inspection and/or palpation of digits and nails (e.g., clubbing, cyanosis, inflammatory conditions, petechiae, ischemia, infections, nodes)

Examination of the joints, bones, and muscles of one or more of the following six areas:

a) head and neck
b) spine, ribs, and pelvis
c) right upper extremity
d) left upper extremity
e) right lower extremity
f) left lower extremity

The examination of a given area may include:

1) Inspection and/or palpation with notation of presence of any misalignment, asymmetry, crepitation,
2) defects, tenderness, masses or effusions
3) Assessment of range of motion with notation of any pain, crepitation or contracture
4) Assessment of stability with notation of any dislocation, subluxation, or laxity
5) Assessment of muscle strength and tone (e.g., flaccid, cogwheel, spastic) with notation of any atrophy or abnormal movements

Skin

1) Inspection of skin and subcutaneous tissue (e.g., rashes, lesions, ulcers)
2) Palpation of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (e.g., induration, subcutaneous nodules, tightening)

Neurologic

1) Test cranial nerves with notation of any deficits
2) Examination of DTRs with notation of any pathologic reflexes (e.g., Babinksi)
3) Examination of sensation (e.g., by touch, pin, vibration, proprioception)

Psychiatric

1) Description of patient’s judgment and insight

Brief assessment of mental status which may include

1) orientation to time, place, and person
2) recent and remote memory
3) mood and affect

1997 Specialty Exams can be found here.

Lastly for all admitted patients you must ALSO meet the third criteria.....Medical Decision Making.....

MDM for short. In this case 99236 the medical decision making must be of high complexity. Which is ALWAYS a bear, unless you know how to do it.

MDM is judged by 3 criteria.

Problem Points, 4 points required
Data Points, 4 Points Requires
Risk Chart, High Risk

Luckily, you only need 2 of 3 criteria to qualify for the Highest Level of MDM. Most people accomplish this feat through data and problem points....

Always hit the problem and the data points, Strive to hit risk….

You need Four Problem Points

New Problem with work up (4)
New problem no Work up (3)
Est Problem, Worsening (2)
Est Problem Stable(1)

Four Data Points
Labs(1) Ordered OR Reviewed
Indep Review of EKG/Film/Specimen (2)
Reviewed Old records (2)
Decision to Obtain Old Records (1)
Discuss test with Physician(1)
Order Test EKG/Cath/PFTs (1)

Risk, to be high risk
1 New Problem which poses a threat to life or limb
1 chronic illness with severe exacerbation
1 change in neurologic status

Or if you chose to do

1. Cardiovascular imaging, with contrast
2. Cardiac EP studies
3. Diagnostic endoscopies
4. Discography
5. Elective major surgery
6. Emergency major surgery
7. Parenteral controlled substances
8. Drug therapy requiring intensive monitoring for toxicity (Digoxin/Heparin)
9. Decision not to resuscitate, or to de-escalate care because of poor prognosis
Or the decision to do the following

Most of these things aren't done on an ambulatory basis, so you are essentially screwed with the risk part of this.

In other words, YOU CAN ONLY BILL 99236 IFF you meet the Problem AND Data points. IF you do not, you cannot likely make the grade for a 99236.

Want to learn more about coding? Email me at modifier25@gmail.com

99232 when your best isn't good enough!

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:29:00 +0000

Sometimes we have patients who just don't meet 99233 criteria for additional days in the hospital. I often find myself asking "Why not discharge them?" Inevitably it is for silly things like

1. Needs IV abx
2. Awaiting placement
3. Has a ride tomorrow
4. Getting therapeutic (Although if there is a PE involved, you go to the 99233 line)

In these cases I find it necessary to review why we missed the 99233 and why I need to code as a 99232.....

For your edification.......

a 99232 is a subsequent day of care in the hospital Which needs you to meet 2 of 3 criteria.
The best part about this coding system is that when you have already established care with the patient, the criteria for upper level codes is far less....

In this case the 2 of 3 are

1. Expanded Problem Focused interval history
2. An expanded Problem Focused examination
3. MDM of moderate complexity

To compare to the 99233 you can read it here.
So again with the sub-categorization of what expanded problem focused means....

Exanded Problem Focused History is:
A chief complaint, a brief HPI (containing one to three HPI elements), plus one ROS. No PFSH is required.

Are you telling me you only do ONE ROS? And only one HPI element? If you do 3, you better do 4 elements. If you do one ROS, you really should do more........Why? It serves the patient better to look for things and think about the case. Too much of medicine is driven to mindless care......

Expanded Problem Focused Exam is:
6 bullet points from one or more system.
Heart and Lungs? Yup.....all done.....

Basically this is a gimme. Did you end up doing more than this? Then you should consider the 99233

Lastly you need to factor in Medical Decision Making.....and in this case it is of moderate complexity.....

What is Moderate Complexity? Remember, this category is judged by
1. Problem Points- I.E. what is the nature of the problem.
2. Data Points- I.E. what work did you review and cogitate over
3. Risk Level- I.E. risk to patient's life

Again, you only need 2 of 3 at the highest level

The risk is evaluated in a risk table presented best at EM University.

One chronic problem with mild exacerbation gives you moderate risk so do 2 stable controlled diseases i.e. hypertension and hyperlipidemia

So you can usually get 2 of 3 here pretty easily. But you should always ask yourself.......did I really do a 99233 instead of a 99232.....It is just good medicine.

Subsequent Hospital Days 99233 is a most often code.

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:08:00 +0000

Ok,
After a long time off, I am back with more coding catastrophes.......

Before going any further, I hope you are making checklists of the documentation requirements for each code. If you are not, then you could end up paying your EMR vendor tons of money so they and your coders can bilk your wallet.......

So let's begin......

Subsequent hospital care includes a review of interval changes since last time, so don't count on that as helping your MDM so much.......

But the good news is for subsequent care, just like for established patients, you only need 2 of 3 categories at the highest level to qualify your coding.....

Let's look at the highest and go down from there

99233 requires:
1. A detailed interval history
2. A detailed examination
3. Medical Decision Making of High Complexity......

Remember, you only need 2 of 3.

A detailed interval history is the next to highest level of history. Which means, you should at least be doing this all the time.....It includes
A. A Chief Complaint
B. An extended HPI: 4 points (Location, Severity, Timing, Modifying Factors, Associated Symptoms, Duration, Quality, Context) All you need is 4 of these.....OR the status of 3 chronic or inactive problems
C. 2-9 Review of Systems, don't we usually do 10?

The last requirement is dropped for subsequent hospital care.
Dropped a requirement? Seriously? Yes. But only for Subsequent Nursing facility care, Subsequent Inpatient care and Subsequent inpatient consultation......

So, it looks as if we can make the History requirement

Next Up, the physical exam

A Detailed Examination

This requires 12 bullets from ANY organ system. Or from multiple organ systems......
These include Vitals and General as 2 Bullets. So 10 bullets points.......You better know the systems by now!

You don't? First time here? Look at this post for the physical exam

Constitutional
(1 bullet for three vital signs)
(1 bullet for general appearance)

Eyes
(1 bullet for inspection of conjunctivae and lids)
(1 bullet for examination of pupils and irises)

Ears, Nose, Mouth and Throat
(1 bullet for external inspection of ears and nose—“atraumautic”)
(1 bullet for examination of oropharynx)

Neck
(1 bullet for examination of neck)
(1 bullet for examination of the thyroid)

Respiratory
(1 bullet for auscultation of lungs)
(1 bullet for assessment of respiratory effort)

Cardiovascular
(1 bullet for auscultation of heart)
(1 bullet for examination of extremities for edema or varicosities)

Gastrointestinal
(1 bullet for examination of the abdomen)
(1 bullet for examination of liver and spleen)

Lymphatic
(1 bullet for examination of lymph nodes in neck)
(1 bullet for examination of lymph nodes in extremities)

Skin
(1 bullet for inspection of skin and subcutaneous tissues)
(1 bullet for palpation of skin and subcutaneous tissues)

Psychiatric
(1 bullet for description of patient’s judgment and insight)
(1 bullet for brief assessment of mental status—orientation)

Total systems = 10

If, examine heart, lungs, skin, abdomen you meet the grade. If you examine HEENT and heart and lungs, you make the grade as well.........

In essence, most of your subsequent care is 99233. What is a 99232?

But what if you didn't make both of those? You fall back on Medical decision making of high complexity.

You need 2 of 3 criteria to make the high complexity grade. As always, these are divided into:
A. Problem Points, you need 4
B. Data Points, again you need 4
C. Risk, you need high risk

The good news, you only need 2 of three. Also, the decision to make someone DNR or to use IV controlled substances qualifies you for high risk!!!

Here's to a morphine drip!!!

So think about it, really hard. Aren't most of your patients in this realm? Do you do exams and review the history daily? If you are and aren't billing a 99233, you are missing crucial dollars you deserve for your work!

Inpatient Admissions, 99222 and 99223

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:00:00 +0000

Do you really think caring for a patient in the hospital costs less than a patient out of the hospital? Apparently Insurance does.

It is the main reason why a decent amount of internal medicine doctors have relinquished their hospital care to doctors who are permanently in the hospital.....

Why should you get paid more for a complete physical with new problems than a patient who is septic and tachycardic?

Does it make any sense?

No.

Which is why I want to make sure you get paid what you should for your hospital care. I am going to cover 2 codes today.

If you have read my previous posts you will understand my philosophy.

1. Doctors often undercode for fear of audits, not because they did less work than they claim.
2. Doctor often think they are documenting properly, but are often wrong.
3. Thus doctors get audited and lose money for their services and the cycle perpetuates....

So with that in mind, let's take a systematic look at the hospital admission The codes 99222 and 99223 are what I will cover, because 99221 should probably not be admitted to the hospital.

Unless of course you have failed outpatient management with them.

99222 requires:
1. A Comprehensive History (See Here)
2. A Comprehensive Examination (See Here)
3. Medical Decision Making of Moderate Complexity

99223 requires:
Same as 99222 except this one key distinction.
Medical Decision Making of High Complexity......

What is the difference between Moderate and High? Not much really.
Try 1 Problem Point and 1 Data Point.

Huh? Ok, I guess if you said huh, you haven't read my other posts......

Medical Decision Making is Judged by 3 things. You need 2 of the 3 at the highest level you code for......

The things?
A. Problem Points. For each of the following things you document you receive points as below

New Problem with work up (4)

New problem no Work up (3)

Est Problem, Worsening (2)

Est Problem Stable(1)

What is the difference between Moderate and Complex? ONE point in this category plus ONE other point in Data, or classified as highest risk!

B. Data Points. For each of the following you document you also get points as below.

Labs Ordered OR Reviewed (1)

Indep Review of EKG/Film/Specimen (2)

Reviewed Old records (2)

Decision to Obtain Old Records(1)

Discuss test with Physician(1)

Order Test EKG/Cath/PFTs (1)

So in this case you need FOUR points to document High Risk, whereas you need 3 points for moderate.

The last item is titled Risk.

Risk is a nebulous little bugger which has been encapsulated in a table by EM University.

Personally I think it may be a little more complex than that, but the table is here for your viewing pleasure.

To meet the Risk criteria for a 99223 (The highest admission code) you need
High Risk

1. One or more chronic illness, with severe exacerbation or progression
2. Acute or chronic illness or injury, which poses a threat to life or bodily function
3. An abrupt change in neurological status
Or if you chose to do
1. Cardiovascular imaging, with contrast
2. Cardiac EP studies
3. Diagnostic endoscopies
4. Discography
5. Elective major surgery
6. Emergency major surgery
7. Parenteral controlled substances
8. Drug therapy requiring intensive monitoring for toxicity (Digoxin/Heparin)
9. Decision not to resuscitate, or to de-escalate care because of poor prognosis

I am certain there are more criteria than this, but I think you get my drift.
Most people you admit have one of 4 things.

1. Infection
2. Exacerbation of Chronic Disease
3. Chest Pain
4. Need Surgery

If you can claim that these conditions are severe, you can claim highest risk......
Or all you have to claim 4 points in Problems and 4 Points in Data.

Most doctors look at EKGs, Most doctors don't say independent review of EKG by me.... There is a huge difference to the insurers. The same is true for radiology studies......If you look at one film and look at one EKG, you have FOUR data points!!!!

That is enough to code at the highest level when you add 4 Problem points, which are probably the easiest to get. Now all you have to do is a comprehensive history and examination, which you better do when admitting a patient!

So In conclusion, most of your admissions will fall as 99223. Just look, take the time to document and get paid what you deserve!

Why coding matters? It IS medicine!

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:47:00 +0000

I have been asked by a lot of my peers as to why we need to learn coding. As if the 4-5 billion they (coders and billers) siphon off of your hard work isn't incentive enough, I say that communication and documentation via CPT criteria is just about the highest order language in medicine.

They then laugh at what I am saying. But think about it. How many times have you read someone else's note and had no clue WTF they were talking about or what was in their mind.

It turns out that if you just document your thoughts through the CPT system and according to auditing standards YOU WILL be communicating and no one will ever question your thoughts......

How does this type of documentation work? Well, you start by obtaining a history and making note of things such as

* Location
* Quality
* Severity
* Duration
* Timing
* Context
* Modifying Factors
* Associated Signs and Symptoms

Yes, of course you ask these things. But how many of you put this in your notes? You should? In fact if you do, you not only help other doctors out, but you also get paid more for what you do.....by including 4 of these with the problem, you can bill at E and M codes at the highest levels

Then let's obtain a family history......yes, you can do that. At least get the first 2 generations, Parents and Children or parents and grandparents. Why? Because you pick up diseases. But even if you don't pick them up, you at least document it for someone who may be able to see something in that tree.......

Past medical? Past Surgical? Ask your patients when they were diagnosed with their diseases and the medications that they had tried. Ask about ADRs. Even if you do all these things, unless you document it........

My point is, organize your thoughts on paper and in the way which includes recognition of the CPT auditing system. If you train your brain to think this way, you will be a higher order physician and your reimbursements will go up because of it. But most importantly, your patients will be healthier.

99215 is closer than you think!

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:08:00 +0000

Once again there is an advantage to having established patients. Often the care for them is easier, you are working on their chronic diseases, preventing others from springing up, and you have great rapport......That does not mean that what you are providing is to be diminished......

What you provide, you should get paid for. Plain and simple. The coding system is a higher level order of communication which also happens to double as legal proof of what we do.........

So without further ado, I present to you that we should be coding more 99215 unlike the 99205, which are reserved for train wrecks dying in your office.

What does a 99215 require. I think we have been through what the majority of E and M codes look for. 3 parts History, Examination AND Medical Decision Making. In this case it requires

1. Comprehensive History
2. Comprehensive Examination
3. Medical Decision Making of High Complexity

Most people look at that and say, wow "High Complexity" I'm not so sure my patient with 5 diseases which I control rather well is complex........I say, "Give yourself some credit!"

Most importantly, with your established patient visits, you only need 2 out of 3 to make the grade for 99215 .......

Let's look at what a 99215 looks like clinically.

CHF exacerbation in a 60 year old man with diabetes and CHF with an EF of 35%. He notes increased SOB/DOE and leg swelling.

Another?

How about a 58 year old male with COPD and DM2 who presents with change in cough and increased medication utilization. He also notes a new fever.

As you can see, these are not TOO COMPLICATED as in not like an ICU patient on a ventilator, but these are sick patients......

99215 is for your sick but not dying patients......The ones you might end up admitting to the hospital, but often show up in the office on Friday afternoon.

Let's look at the cases and the requirements.

1. Comprehensive History.
There are 4 levels of History. Usually we end up doing detailed or comprehensive. This requires

A. 4 elements from History of Present Illness (think PQRI) Or 3 chronic stable problems!
B. 10 point ROS, a given with “All other systems reviewed and are negative.”
C. Plus a complete Past Family/Medical/Social History, which if there is no change you can document "No change since last reviewed fully on Date X". On your initial you need

That is It. That is all that you need for a Comprehensive history...

Oh, the elements for HPI. Didn't I go over those before? Fine! FYE (Edification)

Location
Quality
Severity
Duration
Timing
Context
Modifying Factors
Associated Signs and Symptoms

And the PFSH? Remember, it only takes ONE element from EACH component of PFSH to qualify for a complete PFSH. Do what is clinically needed. This is an easy one to get.

Next up.
2. Complete Physical Examination. This requires: 2 bullets from Nine of the 14 organ systems. You get one point for VS and One point for General Exam-This is called the constitutional system.......

You then need 2 items in 8 other systems. Here are the systems.
The 1997 E/M guidelines recognize the following organ systems:

Constitutional
Eyes
Ears, nose, mouth and throat
Neck
Respiratory
Cardiovascular
Chest (breasts)
Gastrointestinal (abdomen)
Genitourinary (male)
Genitourinary (female)
Lymphatic
Musculoskeletal
Skin
Neurologic
Psychiatric

14 Systems. You can't count Male and Female genitalia on MOST patients......

So if you do just these 2, then you qualify for a 99215. I should stop here.....
But I won't. The last of the 3 categories is the Medical Decision Making.

3. Medical decision making
Also judged by 3 categories. You only need 2 of the 3 at the highest level to meet the standards......

Those 3 categories are

Problem Points-4 points are Needed
Data Points-4 points are Needed
Medical Risk-High Risk is Needed

Remember, you only need 2 of 3 here.

How does it tally?

Problem Points

New Problem with work up-4 points
New Problem with NO work up-3 points
Established Problem, worsening-2 points
Established Problem, Stable-1 point

Data Points

Independent Review of EKG/Film/Specimen-2 Points
Review of Old Records-2 Points
Labs/EKG/Film/PFTs Ordered/Reviewed-1 Point
Discussion with Physician regarding test-1 Point

Medical Risk
Check the table or Just hit one of these

One or more chronic illness, with severe exacerbation or progression
Acute or chronic illness or injury, which poses a threat to life or bodily function (Tough)
Cardiovascular imaging, EGD, or EP studies?
Elective Major Surgery or Emergent Major Surgery
Drug therapy requiring intensive monitoring for toxicity i.e. Heparin
Decision to make DNR

Remember you only need 2 of the 3 here too.....Which means you likely will hit Data Points and Problem points more often than Risk points.....

So what I am saying is, if you have a patient with 3 chronic problems or if you have a patient with some new problems which make the patient sick, then you likely have a 99215. Internists used the 99215 to bill for only 4.1% of established office patients in 2003. Which IMHO is too low.

Want to improve your care and billing? Want to put the 5 billion dollars that billers and coders cost you back into your pocket? Email us at modifier25@gmail.com

99214, where we often are.

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:27:00 +0000

I am back and kicking! I want to continue our series of coding established patient office visits. Today's topic is the 99214. What I want everyone to appreciate about higher level coding your established patients is that there is a subtle distinction between them and your new patients.....

To code a level 4 99204 for your new patients, you are required to meet a higher standard than that of your established patients.....

In fact, you are required with new patients to meet ALL THREE criteria used to judge your notes. Whereas in an established patient you are only required to meet TWO of the THREE criteria. This is huge when it comes to collecting what you deserve for what you perform.........

This is what it looks like: 48 year old man who comes in for a follow up of his HTN and Hyperlipids and Rheumatoid Arthritis.....all are stable.
Another?
A 38 year old man who comes in with an acute problem and a stable problem....that should cut it as well.....It could be a woman too.....doesn't matter.
In the 99214 you are require to meet 2 of the following 3 criteria
1. A detailed history
2. A detailed examination
3. Medical Decision Making of Moderate Complexity......

Which means, patients with relatively simple conditions that require you to take detailed histories and exams on ARE IN FACT 99214 codes! Unlike as if they were a new patient.... So let's go to how this is judged and review it once again.....

You can look at my post about the 99204 for how new patient visit is judged.....But that level is a little higher than the 99214...... Or maybe we should be more clear the 99214 requires FAR LESS than the 99204....
Huh?
Yes, correct, a 99214 is a lower code than a 99204.....which is why insurance pays less for it.
Not because it is an established patient, but because it is LESS SERVICE!!! FAR LESS SERVICE.
A level 4 established patient is NOT a level 4 new patient.......get the fact that a Level 4 is a Level 4 out of your heads now!!!!

So let's review
1. Detailed History:

Let's examine what the definition of "Detailed" is.

"Detailed History"-Requires a Chief Complaint (CC), "extended" HPI, problem pertinent Review of Systems (ROS) which is "extended" to include a limited review of:

A. Family History

B. Social History

C. Past Medical History

All directly related to patient's problem.....requires a chief complaint, an extended HPI (four HPI elements OR the status of three chronic or inactive problems, plus TWO to NINE ROS, plus at least ONE pertinent element of PFSH .

Do you remember the HPI Elements? What about the 10 Systems for Review or the PFSHx? If yes, then congratulations. If no, then let's begin.

HPI Elements are:

Location
Quality
Severity
Duration
Timing
Context
Modifying Factors
Associated Signs and Symptoms

There are 2 levels of HPI-Brief and Extended....Most often you are doing an Extended HPI. You essentially have to document 4 of the preceding categories....for ONE problem.

It is as simple as this from EM University: Patient complains of chest pain (location), which began three hours ago (duration). Pain has been off and on since that time with each episode lasting two to three minutes (timing). The pain is described as “crushing” (quality) and at times is rated as an eight on a scale of one to ten (severity). The pain occurs with minimal exertion (context) and is associated with nausea and shortness of breath (associated signs and symptoms). The pain was relieved with sublingual NTG in the ambulance (modifying factors).

This is all you need to do to qualify for Extended HPI, which is wy more often than not, you are doing an extended HPI.

The Review of Systems? Do you remember which they are? In this case we need 2-9 systems, not even the 10 systems......Who does that? Maybe with a hyperacute issue. Which is why you would be billing a level 2-3 for that. The systems, all 14 of them There are fourteen individual systems recognized by the E/M guidelines:

Constitutional (e.g., fever, weight loss)
Eyes
Ears, Nose, Mouth, Throat
Cardiovascular
Respiratory
Gastrointestinal
Genitourinary
Musculoskeletal
Integumentary (skin and/or breast)
Neurological
Psychiatric
Endocrine
Hematologic/Lymphatic
Allergic/Immunologic

There are 3 levels of the ROS
In the case of 99214 you need 2 to 9 systems it is called an "Extended ROS". Whereas the highest ROS is called a Complete ROS.
Why wouldn't you do a complete ROS every time?
Maybe you are pressured to see 20 patients a day and can't provide the highest level of care......
Even better, the staff can do the ROS for you.....Remember that!
Lastly, to meet detailed HPI you have to document one element of pertinent Family/Social/Medical History.
If nothing has changed, you can document no changes since the LAST TIME YOU DOCUMENTED A FULL ROS..........legally that is valid thing to do.
As for PFSH.....do I really have to do this again? You should have been reading the other posts!

There are 2 levels of PFSH, Pertinent and Complete. Pertinent PFSH requires at least ONE in one of the 3 categories-Past Medical, Past Social or Family History. Allergies and Medications are part of Past Medical.
2 key points here. 1. A staff member may take the PFSH, thus freeing you up.
2. You ONLY require one medical, one social and one family item to qualify for a "Complete" PFSH, which is probably what you are doing anyways.....

In the 99214 you need a Detailed History, which once again is: The second highest level of history and requires a chief complaint, an extended HPI (four HPI elements OR the status of three chronic or inactive problems plus TWO to NINE ROS, plus at least ONE pertinent element of PFSH .

I think you get my drift.....Your detailed history is ALMOST ALWAYS PERFORMED......Which is why you may be missing your 99214s.

In 2003 Internists used this code only 1/4 of all visits....My guess is that they are actually about half of all visits!

Now onto.....
2. Detailed Examination.

Remember the 1997 rules for examination. Bullets and Systems....that's how it goes...... It is 12 Bullets (Things examined) in ANY ORGAN SYSTEM.....One Bullet for Vitals, One for General Appearance and it is now only 10 bullets in any of the 14 systems. I am not going into those systems. But once again, if you do this and the history, then you are done and you have hit a 99214.......

Lastly, you can get there by one of those 2 and the medical decision making. The 99214 requires Medical Decision Making of Moderate Complexity, just like the 99204.

Which is probably why you confused the level 4 new visit as the same service as the level 4 established visit.....

Which, we now all know, it is not.

Moderate Complexity once again is divided into 3 parts
A. Problem Points
B. Data Points
C. Medical Risk (morbidity and mortality) Remember you need only 2 out of 3 of these targets to meet moderate complexity.

Problem Points-You need 3 points

New Problem with work up-4 points
New Problem with NO work up-3 points
Established Problem, worsening-2 points
Established Problem, Stable-1 point

Data Points

Independent Review of EKG/Film/Specimen-2 Points
Review of Old Records-2 Points
Labs/EKG/Film/PFTs Ordered/Reviewed-1 Point
Discussion with Physician regarding test-1 Point

Risk?

2 or more stable chronic illnesses-Bingo
1 Chronic Illness with mild exacerbation-Bingo
1 New undiagnosed problem-You have it
1 Complicated Injury-Again, you hit the risk....

How do we define the risk? With a risk table of course......

There you have it! Have you been missing your 99214 codes? I bet you have. 99214 is about 50% of what we are doing! Remember that.

Want to learn more about coding? Want to take the 5 billion dollars back from the coders and billers? Want to keep your practice in the black? Email us at modifier25@gmail.com

99213 yipee!!! Level 3 established visits.

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Fri, 29 May 2009 12:08:00 +0000

According to EM university, in 2003 this code was used 56.7 percent of the time for internal medicine coding. It is no surprise that we like this "middle of the road" code. The problem is, just because we think it is middle of the road, doesn't make it so. In fact, I would say that the 99213 is so remarkably similar to the 99214 that you may be surprised how very many 99214s you are missing by picking the road most traveled.

Let's take a look at the anatomy of the 99213..

The 99213 is a visit with an established patient that you have seen in the LAST 3 YEARS......which requires a certain level of work and documentation. These requirements are:

1. An "Expanded" Problem focused History
2. An "Expanded" Problem Focused Examination
3. Medial Decision Making of Low Complexity

As you can see, this is made to look like the 99212 except "Expanded" which is why people think it is, to quote Goldilocks......"Just Right"

I beg to differ. In fact I think once you have the needed elements for a 99213 you may be surprisingly close to a 99214.

It all comes down to the documentation.

Lets look at each Element

The "Expanded" Problem Focused History

What the hell does that mean????

This history requires a chief complaint, a brief HPI (containing one to three HPI elements), plus one ROS. No PFSH is required.

Are you telling me that you don't do a review of Past Family, Medical or Social History with each patient? Isn't that what they want us to do with medicine reconciliation??

So likely you will exceed this requirement. An ROS of ONE system? Why do just one? I can think of a million reasons why even simple complaints need more than this.

An "Expanded" Problem Focused Examination

Do you remember bullets? Not dodging them.....hitting them. In the 1997 physical exam rules a bullet system divided organ systems up into the sub exams...i.e. Conjunctivae, Sclera, Fundus for the eye.....

In the "Expanded" Problem Focused Examination you need, 6 bullets from ONE or more organ system......
Vitals signs? 1 Bullet
General Appearance? 1 Bullet

So all you need to do after this is examine 4 other "things" in the same or other organ systems.
Don't remember bullets? You can read about them by clicking here.

The problem is that to reach the next level, you need a much more comprehensive exam. But, the big kicker is that with established patients 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215 you only need 2 out of 3 categories to bill at the highest level. So you may qualify for a 99214 without doing that thorough an examination......Don't let your "Gut" tell you what to code.

The third category as always is the Medical Decision Making........otherwise known as the MDM

In this case, for the 99213 you need low complexity medical decision making......this is what bugs me.........just because your patient is "middle of the road" doesn't mean his MDM is.....

Which is the point that is being made here by the AMA. Is "Low Complexity Medical Decision Making" middle of the road for what you do? Probably not. Diabetes? Not really low complexity. Hypertension, a lot of the time this is not low level either. I view low level like the AMA views low level...In essence, the patient could come in with just ONE chronic problem, Which is STABLE and you make the MDM case. We start with the Points........Yes, MDM is divided up in 3 parts

1. Problem Points-In this case, you need 2 problem points? Do you remember the points per problem? You can review them here.

2. Data Points-These points are for data you review or order. In the 99213 you need 2 of them as well. You can review them here.

3. Risk-I really love this one. Low risk is "Only Marginally Higher than Marginal Risk" WTF? Ok, so just about everything outside of bug bite qualifies as at LEAST Low Risk. Which means, you probably are undercoding if you select 99213....

You should always ask yourself as you put 99213 down on the superbill........Is it really JUST a 99213? Chances are, you would be incorrect and it is in fact a 99214. Remember, just hitting MDM and History gets you a 99214 instead of all 3 being required in the New Patient 99204.

Want to see a 99213?

Here we go,

A 56 year old man present for follow up of well controlled hypertension wishing to change medications. He has absolutely no other complaints......

Anything above and beyond and you should start thinking about a 99214.

Did I just blow your mind? It did mine the first time I saw this.......

Want to learn more about coding? Want to take back the 5 billion dollars take from our remuneration each year? Email us at modifier25@gmail.com

99212 and You......

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Thu, 28 May 2009 13:15:00 +0000

In keeping good faith with the readers of this blog, I am going to move to a "Level 2" Established patient visit. E and M University has some stats from 2003 on this, which may or may not be useful.....

Only 6.7% of Internists used this code in 2003. My guess is that it still is that way....

Why? Well, so often we do more work than the 99211 and 99212. Why? Well, this code requires

1. A problem focused history

2. A problem focused exam

3. Straightforward Medical Decision Making

Do you all remember how each of these categories is judged?

History is judged on:

A. Chief Complaint

B. HPI

C. Review of Systems

D. Review of Past Family, Social, Medical History.

A 99212 requires a Problem focused history which means you have to document a Chief Complaint and ONE HPI element. Just One.

What are the HPI elements? Well first, you need to know that there are only 2 types of HPI-Brief and Extended. What's the difference? Glad you asked. The difference is HUGE and I just told you what was required for Problem Focused.....

Now the elements

A. Location
B. Quality
C. Severity
D. Duration
E. Timing
F. Context
G. Modifying Factors
H.Associated Signs and Symptoms

That's it......you ONLY need one for a problem focused history. But for anything else you need 4 Elements, or the status of 4 or more chronic problems.

Think about it. A patient has pain, we ASK about PQRI (That's 4 BTW) but do we ever document 4? We should.

Now on to the problem focused exam.....

This is probably one of the funniest of them all. Problem focused exam requires ONE Bullet in ONE organ System........

Do you remember the Organ Systems? You can read about them and the bullets at this old post of mine.

But that would be tantamount to say. I took the Vitals......or I heard the heart.
We obviously are doing much more than that. Which is why most often our physica exams fall in the Expanded Problem focused, where you require 6 bullets in one or more organ systems. BTW you get 1 bullet for Vitals and One for General Appearance. Which you should do every time! Then you listen to the heart. Murmurs? No. 1 bullet, PMI shift No? 2 Bullet that's 4 bullets. So do you think you could get 2 more? Yes, most often we do. Which is why you rarely use the Level 2 99212...

In fact most things when a patient follows up are 99213 OR 99214 which will be covered shortly.....

But lastly in case you didn't make one of the previous 2 categories....you always have medical decision making. In the case of 99212 the level of decision making is straightforward medical decision making. Which in essence means you didn't need t o review or to think.....

What is straightforward MDM?

Straightforward Medical Decision-Making is the lowest level of Medical Decision-Making. It is impossible not to qualify for it.

It requires that you meet 2 of the 3 categories with One Point in each OR one category and MINIMAL Medical Risk.
What does that entail? Well, you can review my medical decision making post or you can just see right here

MDM is broken up into Problem Points, Data Points and Risk of Morbidity or Mortality from Disease.

Problem Points are
4 Points-New Problem, New Work up
3 Points-New Problem, No Work Up
2 Points-Established Problem, Worsening
1 Point-Established Problem, Stable

Data Points are
2 Points-Independant review of EKG or Radiology or Specimen
2 Points-Review of Old Records
1 Point-Ordering or Reviewing Labs
1 Point-Discuss results with OTHER physician
1 Point-Ordering tests (EKG/CXR/Cath)
1 Point-Decision to obtain old records

Risk in this case is Minimal Which means "Self limited or minor problem"
Risk is determined by 3 Things
1. Presenting Problem
2. Diagnostic Procedures
3. Management Options Selected

Still Conufsed? You can check the Table of Risk at EM University for further clarification.

Want to learn about coding? Want to take back the 5 billion dollars that medical coders cost you each year? Then join us. Email modifier25@gmail.com to gain access to post and learn about the most valuable and often overlooked expense in your practice.

Do you risk stratify?

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Tue, 26 May 2009 13:30:00 +0000

When you have a new patient, do you do a Framingham or Reynolds risk calculation?

When you have a postpartum follow up, do you do a depression screen?

When you have a geriatric patient, do you do a safe driver evaluation?

Do you calculate the risk of diabetes for patient that have family history of DM2?

If you do any of these things, then you qualify to bill for a 99420.

A Wha? Yes, most coders that I have asked have no clue what this code is.

99420 is defined by the AMA as "Administration and Interpretation of health risk assessment instrument"

All of my new patients get a Reynolds Risk upon return visit after I have their labs to calculate this risk.....

They all get billed for a follow up patient visit AND a 99420. They may also get other services, but they ALL get a Reynolds Risk.

Why? It helps me know when to treat lipids and what preventative therapy to use. So why oh why wouldn't you use these tools? In fact, I argue it is the standard of care to use these tools......

And Now, you can bill for it. And get paid!

Want to join us? Want to put the 5 billion dollars spent on coders back into your pockets? Email us at modifier25@gmail.com

Sitck with the Outpatient Codes, Please. 99211

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Tue, 26 May 2009 12:05:00 +0000

Ok, Ok. I asked a read this week if they would rather have me review further inpatient or out patient codes. They begged me to stick with outpatient codes. So In response to that, no problem.

I figure I can walk you right through some outpatient cases which will help understand how your return patients match up. But first, let's talk a little about the established patient. This is defined as someone who has been seen by you or a physician in the same specialty in your group within the previous three years.There are five levels of care for this type of encounter which all require documentation of TWO out of THREE key components.

These are the absolute same components as you will see for most E and M visits.....

Yes, our lovely friends History, Physical and Medical Decision Making (MDM)

These components are broken down into several subgroups which in the end ultimately determine how much you get paid for Evaluation and Management codes.

The best part about established patients is that you do not have to meet such a high barrier to bill at the higher levels. Instead you only need 2 of 3 components to be at the highest level of your biling. Which is a heck of a lot nicer than the 99205 trainwrecks which require 3 of 3......

Let's talk about the simplest of these today. The 99211. The 99211 was designed as a quick 5 minute visit for follow up of one issue. In fact, this issue was not even thought to incur actual physician to patient face time.

This is a stable and acceptable BP check, done by nurse or PA. Let's look at it.

A 57 year old man comes to the office for a BP check. It is 120/80.....perfect.

The patient has NO OTHER COMPLAINTS OR NEEDS at this time. I repeat, the patient has NO OTHER COMPLAINTS OR NEEDS at this time.

If he has ANYTHING ELSE....this code is not for him and he should be seen by an MD......

99211 equals one problem, no change in management or simple change in management.

This visit does not require any hurdles. In fact the AMA considers this a 5 minute episode.....so If you have gone past 5 minutes, you need to look at other codes. In short, NO ONE REALLY CODES a 99211. In 2003 according to E/M University, 5% of all office visits were this code and the average reimbursement was 21 USD.

Take Home Point, If you've spent more than 5 minutes, you shouldn't use this code.

Want to join us? Want to put that 5 billion dollars the US spends on coders and billers back in your pockets? Email us at modifier25@gmail.com

The lovely 99205, Only for Trainwrecks!

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Thu, 21 May 2009 12:27:00 +0000

Today I want to cover the 99205......but first I think it is appropriate to give you the clinical case prior to boring you with the detail.....That way we can go blow by blow through the case and pick it apart.

The Scenario:

You see a 65 year old man for the first time who is complaining of a 20 pound weight loss, dysphagia, and abdominal pain. His past medical history includes DM2, CAD, OA, Chronic Bronchitis, HTN, GERD and Hyperlipidemia. He takes 8 medications and hasn't seen a doctor in 19 months.

Like I said, 99205 is ONLY for the trainwrecks. There is no way you could even think about upcoding to a 99205. No Way!

I repeat The patient would need to have a severe exacerbation of a chronic problem or an acute illness which threatens life or bodily function to qualify for this level of risk

So let's go through the things that make this different from a 99204 first.

Medical Decision Making (MDM) of High Complexity, that's all. Nothing Else....

But boy, what a bar you are going to have to meet on this one.

What does high complexity MDM entail?

1. Number of Diagnoses or Management Options must be "Extensive"

2. Amount/Complexity of Data Reviewed must also be "Extensive"

3. Lastly, the Risk of MandM must be high....

We have reviewed these a little before, but let's recap.

Remember how I said MDM is difficult and is judged by 3 variable?

These Are Also Called:

A. Problem Points-In this case you need 4 points

B. Data Points-For the 99205 you also need 4 points

C. Risk-This has to be HIGH RISK,

High risk essentially means a condition that is placing the patient in IMMINENT threat of their life. I think you know what these are....but for the non-physicians out there let me give you a hint

1. Myocardial Infarction, but not stable Angina

2. Renal Failure, but not Renal Insufficiency

3. Trauma

4. TIA or Stroke

5. Pulmonary Embolism

6. Status Asthmaticus but not mild exacerbation

I think you get where I am going here......

99205 is only for Trainwrecks....I repeat only for Trainwrecks.......

Want to learn more about coding and save yourself the pain of an Audit?

Email us at modifier25@gmail.com

RACs and RUCs and 99204s, Oh My!!!

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Wed, 20 May 2009 12:25:00 +0000

Today is the next installment in the New Patient Office Visit Series.

We will be covering the 99204 CPT code. In 2003 it was selected 30% of the time for the new patient encounter.....which means just about 65% of patients fit into the 99203 or 99204 zone. My guess is that by the time we are done, you will be using 99204 much more than not.

So what is a 99204?

99204 requires these 3 components

1. A "Comprehensive" History

2. A "Comprehensive" Examination

3. Medical Decision Making of "Moderate" Complexity

Once again the definition of Moderate and Comprehensive are key here.

Moderate Complexity Decision Making is often audited and requires:

A. Multiple Diagnoses or Management Options. AMA doesn't list the exact number here but E and M University has a good wrap up

The take home is that new problems with additional work up gets a maximum of 4 problem points. If it is a new problem with no further work up it is 3 points.

You can feel pretty confident billing 99204 here if you have 3 points here AND

B. Amount and/or complexity of data reviewed has to be moderate as well.

In this case you would need 3 data points reviewed. Ordering clinical lab tests counts as 1 point. So does ordering a radiology test, the same with EKG.

Discussing the results with a physician gives you a measly one point as well. But independent review of the specimen, image or tracing gives you 2 points......

So if you looked at the film, document that you looked at the film....or EKG.....

Review and summation of Old Records ALSO gives you 2 points.......

You can consider yourself getting warm here if you have 3 data points here AND 3 problem points.......

C. Moderate Risk of Complications, Morbidity or Mortality.....Well, what does that mean?

You can turn to the "Table of Risk!"

This basically indicates that you have one thing of 3 categories......

Category A-Presenting Problems

One or more chronic illnesses with mild exacerbation

Two or more stable chronic illnesses (HTN and Hyperlipidemia)

One Undiagnosed New problem

Acute Illness with Systemic Symptoms

Category B-Diagnostic Procedures

Stress Test or Fetal Stress test

Diagnostic Endoscopies

Deep Needle or Incisional Biopsies

Cardiac Cath

Fluid removal from Body Cavity

Category C-Management Options Selected

Minor surgery

Elective Major Surgery

Prescribing Medicines

IV fluids

Closed treatment of a fracture

So, you need one of each category to qualify Risk as a moderate data point

Listen, this system is complicated here.....My gut tells me that you should not count on using Risk as 1 of your 2 required points to qualify MDM as moderate complexity.

My take home on MDM is-Always review your own data, Always review old records,

Always document new problems and demonstrate your work up of them......If you do these things you will likely qualify for moderate MDM

Now that's over, let's look at a Comprehensive Exam

Comprehensive is defined as

1. "A general multisystem examination"

2. " A complete examination of a single organ system"

Organ systems are:

Eyes

Each Extremity, I repeat EACH Extremity

Ear, Nose,Throat and Mouth

Eyes

Respiratory

Musculoskeletal

Skin

Neurologic

Psychiatric

Heme/Lymph

If you set up a template of your exam as such, you will do well in documenting these events. The take home here is that to be complete you would need 2 bullets for each of the 9 systems.......Ah silly coders, they have to be so precise in defining complete.....do they really know what complete means?

I go over bullets and the exam in prior posts

This is a gimmee here. Anyone would do this for a new patient......Anyone......Count Complete physical as one of the 2 Categories filled

Lastly,

Complete History. This bugger is considered the Highest Level of History. Which means often people try but fail at performing this.

This history includes:

1. Chief Complaint

2. "Extended" HPI

3. Review of systems related to the problems in the HPI PLUS all other systems

4. COMPLETE Family, Social and Past Medical and Past Surgical History

I will go through each in detail, but suffice to say.....you should be doing these things for ALL new patients if you want to code a 99204.....I actually do this for ALL of my new patients....I will explain why shortly...

The big question here is likely to be What is a COMPLETE PM/PS/Soc/FamHx (PFSHx)......One thing it isn't is NonContributory.......It is at a minimum-Parents, Siblings AND Children! I do grandparents too!

This includes Medicines and Allergies! I repeat, this includes medicines and allergies....

I plan on covering this in another post, but just keep these tips in mind.

Is the patient married? Are they employed? Have they had education? Do they have exposures? Sex? Drugs? Rock and Roll?

Remember, nearly all outpatient codes require some elements of this here. So it is just good sense to do this at EVERY encounter.....

And most importantly, the PFSHx can be taken by another person, OR EVEN a Form......

What does this look like in real time?

Initial visit for a 59 year old woman with HTN, Obesity, OA. She has a complaint of palpitations with some occasional dizziness. Her PMSFHx includes TAHBSO for DUB 15 years ago. She has not been seen for 5 years.

If this new patient is also here for a complete physical exam....there is something I need to share with you.....it is called Modifer 25....the name of this blog!

Want to learn coding and billing? Want to put 5 billion back in your pockets? Join us....email us at modifier25@gmail.com

How a code becomes a check......

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Tue, 19 May 2009 11:58:00 +0000

What I love about learning this whole system is that you begin to understand that people who are not doctors are always trying to quantify what you do and how you do it. Things such as RVUs turn a clinician into a blue collar worker.

It is one of the most disgusting things that I have seen. That's why I gave up working for anyone who wishes to tell me how productive I am. At the end of the day, just ask my patients, they will tell you how productive I am......

This coding and auditing system cracks me up. Here you have a bunch of people from the AMA, HCFA, and other organizations trying to explain what we do in a very, VERY detailed way, without having the direct professional understanding of how we do it.

Granted, there are some physicians on these panels......but they are NOT all specialties or the majority. CPT was started in the late 60s and encouraged to use as a data reporting tool, to "standardize" what we do......sounds eerily familiar to PQRI.....

It was then accepted by Medicare in 1983 as the mode of reporting for reimbursement......that's when hell came on earth.......slowly...

The CPT manual is updated annually through an editorial review process. The CPT Editorial Panel meets 3-4 times per year to review requests received from specialty societies, manufacturers and individuals. The Panel is supported in its deliberations by a larger body of CPT advisors, known as the CPT Advisory Committee

This body, it is oft complained as existing to serve the specialists and not the generalists.....This could be seen as sour grapes, or it could represent a serious lack of voice....

Either way, you have a coding committee who may not represent all parties.....Which is not an equitable or reasonable position to take.

That being said

Once a coding change is accepted by the CPT Editorial Panel, the next step in the CPT process is to determine the reimbursement for the code, through a survey of physician work and determination of direct practice expense (PE). The survey results are submitted to the RUC for negotiation for a mutually acceptable value to be submitted to CMS for final approval and publication in the Federal Register Final Rule. The approved CPT code and their associated RVUs are then published.

You may be asking......What is the RUC and What is an RVU

The RUC is:

The Relative Value Update Committee, a decision-making body which reviews all surveys of physician work values (52 percent of the total RVU for a service/procedure) and practice expense or PE (44 percent of the total RVU for a service/procedure) and makes recommendations regarding these components to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for reimbursement determination. Members of the RUC are appointed by national medical specialty societies.

What in an RVU?

An evil way to turn us into worker bees, rather than professionals....

If you really must know, then you can read about it here.

Relative value units

Although several relative value systems are recognized and used nationally, the most identifiable system is the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale, or RBRVS. The RBRVS system was adopted in 1992 by CMS as a method for setting Medicare reimbursement levels. Under the RBRVS methodology, services are assigned a numerical value or weight, which is relative to all other codes. The numerical value, or relative value unit (RVU), is actually made up of three component units — designated for work, practice expenses, and malpractice expenses.

To set the Medicare allowable rate, the component units are factored by corresponding geographic indices, summed, and then multiplied by a standard conversion factor. Basically, it is a lot of economic shenanigans to devalue what we do....

Each year, CMS makes changes to the RBRVS component units, based upon the introduction of new CPT codes, changes to code values by the American Medical Association (AMA) and specialty societies’ RUC (Relative Value Update Committees), and government budget constraints and indices.

For the last decade or so, Mediare has been trying to cut payments to physicians, despite practice expenses and malpractice expenses going up each year. Funny really when you think that their equation relies so heavily on these 2 factors. The real issue lies in the standard conversion factors......

With one simple change of an equation, the entire system, which is already on its knees, could be dropped to the floor.

So, the question becomes, "So this is Medicare and Medicaid, what about regular insurance?"

The AMA receives approximately $70 million annually from licensing fees for anyone wishing to relate RVUs with CPT codes, making them reluctant to allow the free distribution of tools and data that might help physicians calculate their fees accurately and fairly.

I.E. the AMA makes millions off of the insurers who want to use the governmental system for setting their fee schedules....

So, the AMA is in bed with the government AND the commercial insurers.....to "help the doctor-members"

But just like most politicians who go to Washington, this system is corrupted. And we need to fix it, by learning the system and using it to our advantage to get paid fairly for what we do.

That my friend is how we turn a code into a check.....I am going to post links to each of these important boards.

About the RUC only 5 of the 29 are primary care.

Not exactly the 2/3rds majority required to change payments....Did you know that the AMA could have been threatened with Anti-Trust laws by telling the public what this committee does?

I can't find the membership of the CPT editorial committee.....does anyone have this information???

Want to join us? Want to share your opinions about coding and billing? Want to put that 5 billion back in your pockets????

Email us at modifier25@gmail.com and we'll set you up to post on this blog!

What's the difference in physical exam types? Bullets and 1997.

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Mon, 18 May 2009 13:01:00 +0000

I actually have seen these in a few shrouded away places...But most physicians don't know these rules......You see, in 1997 the EM physical exam rules were updated from the loosey goosey rules of 1995.....They rely on these "Bullet Points" which allow atomatons to check the boxes and audit our charts much easier. It also allows for the automation and creation of EMR exam forms....i.e. "check the box" or "Check the Bullets"

Here are the 1997 Physical Exam Rules, Couched with levels of physical examination.

1997 Physical Exam Rules

General Multi-System Exam

1997 Problem Focused Exam

One to five bullets from one or more organ systems

Example

Vitals: 120/80, 88, 98.6
General appearance: NAD, conversant
Lungs: CTA
CV: RRR, no MRGs

(1 bullet for three vital signs)
(1 bullet for general appearance)
(1 bullet for auscultation of lungs)
(1 bullet for auscultation of the heart)

Total bullets = four (although only one to five bullets are required)

1997 Expanded Problem Focused Exam

At least two bullets from six organ systems OR 12 bullets from two or more organ systems

Example

Vitals: 120/80, 88, 98.6
General appearance: NAD, conversant
Lungs: Clear to auscultation
CV: RRR, no MRGs
Abdomen: Soft, nontender
Extremities: No peripheral edema

(1 bullet for three vital signs)
(1 bullet for general appearance)
(1 bullet for auscultation of lungs)
(1 bullet for auscultation of the heart)
(1 bullet for examination of the abdomen)
(1 bullet for examination of extremities for edema)

Total bullets = six

1997 Detailed Exam
At least two bullets from six organ systems OR 12 bullets from two or more organ systems

Example

Vitals: 120/80, 88, 98.6
General appearance: NAD, conversant
Neck: FROM, supple
Lungs: Clear to auscultation
CV: RRR, no MRGs; normal carotid upstroke and amplitude without bruits
Abdomen: Soft, non-tender; no masses or HSM
Extremities: No peripheral edema or digital cyanosis
Skin: no rash, lesions or ulcers
Psych: Alert and oriented to person, place and time

(1 bullet for three vital signs)
(1 bullet for general appearance)
(1 bullet for examination of neck)
(1 bullet for auscultation of lungs)
(1 bullet for auscultation of the heart)
(1 bullet for assessment of carotid arteries)
(1 bullet for examination of the abdomen)
(1 bullet for examination of liver and spleen)
(1 bullet for examination of extremities for edema)
(1 bullet for examination and/or palpation of digits and nails)
(1 bullet for inspection of skin and subcutaneous tissue)
(1 bullet for brief assessment of mental status—orientation)

Total bullets = 12

1997 Comprehensive Exam

Two bullets from EACH of nine organ systems

Example

Vitals: 120/80, 88, 98.6
General appearance: NAD, conversant
Eyes: anicteric sclerae, moist conjunctivae; no lid-lag; PERRLA
HENT: Atraumatic; oropharynx clear with moist mucous membranes and no mucosal ulcerations;
normal hard and soft palate
Neck: Trachea midline; FROM, supple, no thyromegaly or lymphadenopathy
Lungs: CTA, with normal respiratory effort and no intercostal retractions
CV: RRR, no MRGs
Abdomen: Soft, non-tender; no masses or HSM
Extremities: No peripheral edema or extremity lymphadenopathy
Skin: Normal temperature, turgor and texture; no rash, ulcers or subcutaneous nodules
Psych: Appropriate affect, alert and oriented to person, place and time

Systems and Bullets

Constitutional
(1 bullet for three vital signs)
(1 bullet for general appearance)

Eyes
(1 bullet for inspection of conjunctivae and lids)
(1 bullet for examination of pupils and irises)

Ears, Nose, Mouth and Throat
(1 bullet for external inspection of ears and nose—“atraumautic”)
(1 bullet for examination of oropharynx)

Neck
(1 bullet for examination of neck)
(1 bullet for examination of the thyroid)

Respiratory
(1 bullet for auscultation of lungs)
(1 bullet for assessment of respiratory effort)

Cardiovascular
(1 bullet for auscultation of heart)
(1 bullet for examination of extremities for edema or varicosities)

Gastrointestinal
(1 bullet for examination of the abdomen)
(1 bullet for examination of liver and spleen)

Lymphatic
(1 bullet for examination of lymph nodes in neck)
(1 bullet for examination of lymph nodes in extremities)

Skin
(1 bullet for inspection of skin and subcutaneous tissues)
(1 bullet for palpation of skin and subcutaneous tissues)

Psychiatric
(1 bullet for description of patient’s judgment and insight)
(1 bullet for brief assessment of mental status—orientation)

Total systems = 10 (although only nine are required)
Total bullets = 20 (although only 18 are required—two in EACH of nine systems)

Organ Systems

The 1997 E/M guidelines recognize the following organ systems:

1. Constitutional
2. Eyes
3. Ears, nose, mouth and throat
4. Neck
5. Respiratory
6. Cardiovascular
7. Chest (breasts)
8. Gastrointestinal (abdomen)
9. Genitourinary (male)
10.Genitourinary (female)
11. Lymphatic
12. Musculoskeletal
13. Skin
14. Neurologic
15. Psychiatric

Physical Exam Bullets

Constitutional

    1)   Three vital signs
   2)    General appearance

Eyes

    1)   Inspection of conjunctivae and lids
    2)   Examination of pupils and irises (PERRLA)
    3)   Ophthalmoscopic discs and posterior segments

Ears, Nose, Mouth, and Throat

    1)   External appearance of the ears and nose (overall appearance, scars, lesions, masses)
    2)   Otoscopic examination of the external auditory canals and tympanic membranes
    3)   Assessment of hearing
    4)   Inspection of nasal mucosa, septum and turbinates
    5)   Inspection of lips, teeth and gums
    6)   Examination of oropharynx: oral mucosa, salivary glands, hard and soft palates, tongue, tonsils and posterior pharynx

Neck

    1)   Examination of neck (e.g., masses, overall appearance, symmetry, tracheal position, crepitus)
    2)   Examination of thyroid

Respiratory

    1)   Assessment of respiratory effort (e.g., intercostal retractions, use of accessory muscles, diaphragmatic movement)
    2)   Percussion of chest (e.g., dullness, flatness, hyperresonance)
    3)   Palpation of chest (e.g., tactile fremitus)
    4)   Auscultation of the lungs

Cardiovascular

    1)   Palpation of the heart (location, size, thrills)
    2)   Auscultation of the heart with notation of abnormal sounds and murmurs
    3)    Assessment of lower extremities for edema and/or varicosities
    4)   Examination of the carotid arteries (e.g., pulse amplitude, bruits)
    5)   Examination of abdominal aorta (e.g., size, bruits)
    6)   Examination of the femoral arteries (e.g., pulse amplitude, bruits)
    7)    Examination of the pedal pulses (e.g., pulse amplitude)

Chest (Breasts)

    1)   Inspection of the breasts (e.g., symmetry, nipple discharge)
    2)   Palpation of the breasts and axillae (e.g., masses, lumps, tenderness)

Gastrointestinal (Abdomen)

    1)   Examination of the abdomen with notation of presence of masses or tenderness
    2)   Examination of the liver and spleen
    3)   Examination for the presence or absence of hernias
    4)   Examination (when indicated) of anus, perineum, and rectum, including sphincter tone, presence of hemorrhoids,
           rectal masses
    5)   Obtain stool for occult blood testing when indicated

Genitourinary (Male)

    1)    Examination of the scrotal contents (e.g., hydrocoele, spermatocoele, tenderness of cord, testicular mass)
    2)   Examination of the penis
    1)   Digital rectal examination of the prostate gland (e.g., size, symmetry, nodularity, tenderness)

Genitourinary (Female)

Pelvic examination (with or without specimen collection for smears and cultures, which may include:

    1)   Examination of the external genitalia (e.g., general appearance, hair distribution, lesions)
    2)   Examination of the urethra (e.g., masses, tenderness, scarring)
    3)    Examination of the bladder (e.g., fullness, masses, tenderness)
    4)   Examination of the cervix (e.g., general appearance, discharge, lesions)
    5)   Examination of the uterus (e.g., size, contour, position, mobility, tenderness, consistency, descent or support)
    6)    Examination of the adnexa/parametria (e.g., masses, tenderness, organomegaly, nodularity)

Lymphatic

Palpation of lymph nodes two or more areas:

    1)   Neck
    2)    Axillae
    3)    Groin
    4)   Other

Musculoskeletal

    1)   Examination of gait and station
    2)   Inspection and/or palpation of digits and nails (e.g., clubbing, cyanosis, inflammatory conditions, petechiae, ischemia,           infections, nodes)

Examination of the joints, bones, and muscles of one or more of the following six areas:

    a)   head and neck
    b)    spine, ribs, and pelvis
    c)    right upper extremity
    d)   left upper extremity
    e)   right lower extremity
    f)    left lower extremity

The examination of a given area may include:

1)   Inspection and/or palpation with notation of presence of any misalignment, asymmetry, crepitation,
2)   defects, tenderness, masses or effusions
3)   Assessment of range of motion with notation of any pain, crepitation or contracture
4)  Assessment of stability with notation of any dislocation, subluxation, or laxity
5) Assessment of muscle strength and tone (e.g., flaccid, cogwheel, spastic) with notation of any atrophy or abnormal movements

Skin

    1)   Inspection of skin and subcutaneous tissue (e.g., rashes, lesions, ulcers)
   2)   Palpation of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (e.g., induration, subcutaneous nodules, tightening)

Neurologic

    1)    Test cranial nerves with notation of any deficits
    2)   Examination of DTRs with notation of any pathologic reflexes (e.g., Babinksi)
    3)   Examination of sensation (e.g., by touch, pin, vibration, proprioception)

Psychiatric

    1)   Description of patient’s judgment and insight

Brief assessment of mental status which may include

   1)   orientation to time, place, and person
   2)   recent and remote memory
   3)   mood and affect

1997 Specialty Exams can be found here.

So there you have it......if you have the time to read through this and understand, you can see that the more you document the better. If you do use an EMR, you probably all ready have this. But if you are on paper, you should update your exam form to include the systems and perhaps even the bullets. This will prompt you to examine "All the pertinent systems"

Want to join us? Email us at modifier25@gmail.com

Middle of the Road 99203

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Mon, 18 May 2009 12:26:00 +0000

According to EM University, in 2003 this code accounted for 39% of all documented office visits in 2003. I wonder why we don't have any further data on this. Wouldn't it be fantastic if we could see who was coding what and how often? Imagine if we could have a website that would present this information to physicians yearly and then match it against your rates? Well, there are some pay services that allow this for subscribers of their service....

I think you know how I feel about someone taking your data, compiling it with others AND THEN SELLING IT BACK TO YOU!

Frankly, that is just bull......I think it should either be outlawed OR we should be given FREE ACCESS to this.

It is after all, OUR DATA.

So with that little rant out. Let me tell you about a 99203

A 99203 is also called a Level 3 New Office Visit. What is it?

This office visit requires 3 key components

1. A Detailed History

2. A Detailed Examination

3. Medical Decision making of LOW complexity

Why do I point out Low complexity? Because, I think we may actually be coding too much of these and may instead need to be coding more 99204s and 99202s....

Let's examine what the definition of "Detailed" is.

"Detailed History"-Requires a Chief Complaint (CC), "extended" HPI, problem pertinent Review of Systems (ROS) which is "extended" tp incude a limited review of:

A. Family History

B. Social History

C. Past Medical History

All directly related to patient's problem.....

2. Detailed Examination-Requires an "Extended" examination of the affected body area or organ system AND other symptomatic or related organ systems.....

"Extended Examination"- requires 12 data points/bullets.

If you want to learn more about bullets you can see it here.

3. Lastly, Medical Decision Making of "LOW COMPLEXITY"

Which requires

1. Limited number of Diagnoses or Management Options

2. Limited amount of data to review

3. Low complexity of data to review

4. Disease with low morbidity or mortality

So the question remains...."What does this look like?"

Initial offive visit for a 67 year old woman with hypertension, new to the area. She has had no problems with her BP while on a diuretic and home bp monitoring. She brings in her log.

You are expected to do the same things that you would for a 99202

So why do I think we are using this code too much? Here's the question.....would you do such a thorough History or Physical in a patient with well controlled HTN?

Probably not, which would then bump you down to a 99202.

But what about well controlled diabetes? The mortality and morbidity is higher and you would do more work.....thus a 99204, which I will cover tomorrow......

You see, by choosing middle of the road, we may be coding wrong......

Want to join us? Email us at modifier25@gmail.com You can learn the system and be better at coding too. This may save you 80-100k per year.....

Fridays are Fun Days, Wolfram Alpha Fun!

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Fri, 15 May 2009 12:16:00 +0000

I will skip writing about coding on Fridays and instead will focus on technology that will bring us closer to removing some of the layers of ineptitude in medicine and the business practice.

Wolfram Alpha is going to change how we understand coding and in fact if done properly, this computational system could put the Athena Health service which I mentioned wanting to charge me 10,000 USD for a set up. If done properly by placing the rejection claims on the internet where Wolfram Alpha could access it.

Athena Health brags that they have 17,000 US physicians dumping into their database........What if the 700,000 physicians dump this information onto the Internet so that Wolfram Alpha can access it?

It may just so turn out that by writing apps around Wolfram Alpha, we may actually be able to replace the billing software systems as well.

You see, the CPT code and ICD9/10 system were made for our benefit. Not to cost us money. It will only take a small matter of time before the inevitable has happened.

Wolfram Alpha is soon going to be Wolfram Beta, which will then be Wolfram.....

And we will have just put billions of dollars back in the pockets of doctors.

But it starts with you......joining us and putting this info online.......or at least blogging with us....

Want to join our blog? Email us at modifier25@gmail.com

Is it really a 99202?

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Thu, 14 May 2009 11:56:00 +0000

Yesterday I mentioned the 99201 CPT E and M code. I said that it turns out most people over code the 99201 as a 99202. But I then thought, how would they know the difference and why would they over code.

Often overcoding is due to ignorance of what is required from each code. And frankly, to quote ex-president Clinton..........It depends on what the definition of Is, Is......

The same is true with words such as problem versus expanded problem.......

What does expanded problem mean? Expanded problem means that you took a problem relevant review of systems......my guess is that most of you do this, but often fail to document this. Review of Systems is super important here. In the 99201 you can get away without doing it in the HPI, but in the 99202 you cannot.

What is the 99202? A new patient which requires 3 components

1. An expanded problem focused history (Includes ROS)

2. An expanded problem focused exam

3. Straightforward medical decision making

So you may be asking yourself, "What is an expanded problem focused exam?"

A limited examination of the affected body area OR organ system affected AND other symptomatic or related organ systems

And now I hope you understand Straightforward Medical Decision Making......If not...

It is determined by:

1. The number of possible diagnoses if greater than 3 is usually complex....make sure you list differentials in your notes!!!

2. The amount of or complexity of medical records. labs, and other information that must be reviewed. Document ALL records reviewed in your notes.....

3. The risk of complications, morbidity and mortality associated with the problems, procedures and management options....

I hope you now see why cardiologists/surgeons/gastroenterologists get paid so much more than internists......EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEIR CASES can be billed at higher levels of medical decision making.....

So, with that primer, let's see a 99202 in action.....

A 45 year old man is in with history and skin findings consistent with poison oak who is not responding to OTC treatment....

What is expected of you:

1. Preservice, review the medical history forms AND vital signs

2. Intraservice, Obtain the expanded problem history and physical, Formulate a diagnosis, formulate a treatment plan-Straight forward here-i.e. less than 3 differentials and simple treatment either way....Don't try and fudge this one...it is what it is....now reconcile your meds, write the Rx and test if you really need to...

3. Document what you did, including listing dif Dx, care coordinate AND handle another treatment failure prn....

There, that wasn't so tough......Now how many of these do you see in a day....my guess is a whole lot more than you had thought about if you are new......if you are established, probably one to 2 a day at maximum.....

Want to Join us? Email me at modifier25@gmail.com so you can start blogging and learning codes too!

Welcome to my first Initiates!

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Wed, 13 May 2009 12:47:00 +0000

I just received 3 emails from doctors looking to join the fray. They came from MedScape!

Welcome. Today I wanted to go over some simple things first. The Current Procedural Terminology Evaluation and Management Codes. These codes were introduced into the system in 1992 so they are only 17 years old. Yes that is correct, 17 years of insanity. Which is why the whole field has only gotten even more bloated lately.....

Prior to the E and M codes "visit" codes were used. Which obviously made a lot more sense to physicians who usually had their day scheduled as such with types of visits as comprehensive physicals and brief check ups.....

But, to dismantle the system we need to do it systematically. That is, by finding out what these codes mean and then applying them appropriately.

The next 5 days will be spent on the new patient E and M codes.

We start off the 9920x series with 99201. Office or outpatient visit for the new patient.

99201 requires 3 things.

1. A focused Problem History

2. A problem focused exam

3. Straight forward Medical Decision Making (This is the little bastard that gets us all)

As physicians, I think we need a good understanding and the best way to do that is with a clinical example of a 99201.....so here you go.

Initial visit for a 24 year old here for a refill of her acne cream.

These insurers are assuming you are doing the following things for this patient and it would be wise to document these as well as the mandatories.

1. Preservice-review the medical history form that the patient filled out while in the waiting room

2. Intraservice-Problem focused exam-in this case the skin, Formulate a treatment plan, discuss this with the patient. Also, discuss the need for preventative health maint....Reconcile medications and write an Rx as needed

3. Postservice-Complete the medical documentation, handle treatment failure if that happens, provide care coordination......

Pretty simple huh? How many people bill this one as a 99202???? I bet a ton of you do. But you will soon see that the cost of an audit is more than the extra few bucks you might get for jumping from a 1 to a 2.....

Want to Join our project? Email me at modifier25@gmail.com

OIG's work plan.

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Wed, 06 May 2009 17:23:00 +0000

Have you ever wondered what Medicare was going to focus on and who medicare was going to focus on with their Auditing of Charts? Well know you can. Bookmark this site. This is the work plan for the office of Inspector General of the United States.

From the Site:

The OlG Work Plan sets forth various projects to be addressed during the fiscal year by the Office of Audit Services, Office of Evaluation and Inspections, Office of Investigations, and Office of Counsel to the Inspector General. The Work Plan includes projects planned in each of the Department's major entities: the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; the public health agencies; and the Administrations for Children, Families, and Aging. Information is also provided on projects related to issues that cut across departmental programs, including State and local government use of Federal funds, as well as the functional areas of the Office of the Secretary. Some of the projects described in the Work Plan are statutorily required, such as the audit of the Department's financial statements, which is mandated by the Government Management Reform Act.

Here's the plan

Place of Service Errors
Evaluation and Management Services During Global Surgery Periods
Medicare Practice Expenses Incurred by Selected Physician Specialties
Services Performed by Clinical Social Workers
Outpatient Physical Therapy Services Provided by Independent Therapists
Medicare Payments for Colonoscopy Services
Physicians’ Medicare Services Performed by Nonphysicians
Appropriateness of Medicare Payments for Polysomnography
Long-Distance Physician Claims Requiring a Face-to-Face Visit
Geographic Areas With a High Density of Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities
Patterns Related to High Utilization of Ultrasound Services
Medicare Payments for Chiropractic Services Billed With the Acute Treatment Modifier
Physician Reassignment of Benefits
Medicare Payments for Unlisted Procedure Codes
Laboratory Test Unbundling by Clinical Laboratories
Variation of Laboratory Pricing
Clotting Factor Furnishing Fee
Medicare Billings With Modifier GY

If you are doing any of these things or have any issues with this. Consider this blog post fair warning!

Physicians Undercode out of Fear and Emotions.

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Wed, 06 May 2009 14:49:00 +0000

This article is a must read. It turns out that Physicians often overcode Evaluation and Management codes. At least according to Medicare stats. Which is why you should pay attention when you read this article. The take home points???

1. “Some physicians will code every office visit as a 99212 just to stay under the radar and avoid a Medicare audit,” says Ginny Martin of Healthcare Consulting Associates of NW Ohio in Waterville. “However, coding everything the same can initiate an audit as well.”

2. Medicare data suggests that, for evaluation and management services, overcoding is far more common. Medicare providers overcode with the ubiquitous 99213

3. “Medical necessity of a service is the overarching criterion for payment in addition to the individual requirements of a CPT code.”

4. For a 99214, the nature of the presenting problem(NPP) is usually of a moderate to high severity, in contrast to a 99211, where the NPP is usually minimal. Pinning down the NPP level is the key to accurate coding

5. Arrive at a tentative NPP as part of your differential diagnosis once they take a comprehensive history. We use 3 gen pedigree and extensive social history. Include a field for the NPP on your hard-copy encounter form or in your EMR

6. Use the whole ICD9 Code: “I’m stunned by how many doctors don't do that. A 250.00 means Type II diabetes that’s under control. What if it’s not under control? That’s 250.02.”

So to summarize, use the right code, be realistic with your encounters and make this PART OF YOUR CLINICAL PRACTICE. By using these, you begin to scrape away the magic of the billers and coders.....How do you do this? Keep reading, we'll get there.

If you are interested about joining us, then email modifier25@gmail.com to get access to this blog!

4 Billion Dollars. Out of Your Pockets.

noreply@blogger.com (Steve Murphy MD) — Wed, 06 May 2009 14:09:00 +0000

Hello,

I am Steven Murphy M.D.

I am a physician who has a medical practice that just began accepting insurance. I take the best care of my patients possible, but I am not getting paid what I deserve for what I do. Why? I don't know squat about Insurance Billing. If you are like most doctors, I am certain you don't either. But here's the good news. I am doing a deep dive into Medical Coding and Insurance Billing.

If the average Medical Coder gets paid 40-50k per year and the American Academy of Professional Coders has a membership base of 75,000 then I estimate that we are AT LEAST spending 4 Billion dollars on medical coding each and every year. Who pays those people? Doctors pay them a percentage of each and every bit of the sweat of their labor.

Why? Because they can fill out some web forms and follow up on our payments for us? Is that really worth 4-8 percent of your work?

I know primary care physicians going out of business. I bet they could have used that 4-8 percent over the lifetime of their practice.

I am committed to removing this layer of expense. It is my purpose, It is my aim to have you, the physician, learn everything about coding. Why? So that we can put that 4 billion dollars back in YOUR POCKETS.....

Here's my strategy and I just learned it from a group called Athena Health. They actually gave me the impetus to do this. They have 17,000 physicians signed up. Those physicians dump all of their EOBs, Denials etc into this huge database.

When a physician who has signed up with them goes to submit a claim, Athena's database prescreens the claim, looking to see if it meets all the "rules" from insurers....it then sends the claim on to insurers.

Sounds great right? Well, they actually told me it would cost me 10,000 USD to get started and then they would take 4-8 percent of my revenues for what they did. I said to the salesman, so you are basically a medical coding and billing service.....He said yes.

So even with the bells and whistles all that these people do is act like leeches and suck our blood.

So here's my take. We create this blog, open it up to anyone who wants to post about denials or issues with insurance.....we cover each others' backs. We alert others to things insurers do. Heck, if we have enough users, we can even create our own "open source" Athena which is "Free" to all users and contributors.....

We create Athena's database, without having to shell out any money. Just a little time to rant and rave.......and save healthcare's most neglected professional......The Doctor.

If you are interested about joining us, then email modifier25@gmail.com to get access to this blog!