<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;CEIFR3w_eyp7ImA9WhBUF0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825</id><updated>2013-05-05T07:15:16.243-04:00</updated><category term="mediation" /><category term="vt" /><category term="overdose" /><category term="nyt" /><category term="kaiser" /><category term="cancer" /><category term="medical negligence" /><category term="best lawyers" /><category term="medical malpractice news" /><category term="damages" /><category term="new hampshire" /><category term="infection" /><category term="news" /><category term="editorial" /><category term="strategy" /><category term="rhode island" /><category term="medical records" /><category term="maine" /><category term="psychiatrist" /><category term="medical mistake" /><category term="las vegas" /><category term="trends" /><category term="bacteria" /><category term="vermont" /><category term="ri" /><category term="submit" /><category term="medical malpractice verdict" /><category term="heart attack" /><category term="malpractice claims" /><category term="massachusetts" /><category term="publish" /><category term="injury news" /><category term="study" /><category term="resources" /><category term="arkansas" /><category term="eye surgery" /><category term="online news" /><category term="newborn" /><category term="specialties" /><category term="caesarean" /><category term="sinus infection" /><category term="safe harbor" /><category term="medical liability" /><category term="cardiac" /><category term="screening panels" /><category term="trial" /><category term="south carolina" /><category term="never events" /><category term="cardiologist" /><category term="medical malpractice" /><category term="jury award" /><category term="reform" /><category term="rebecca riley" /><category term="statute of limitations" /><category term="medical malpractice data" /><category term="verdicts and settlements" /><category term="patient safety" /><category term="arbitration" /><category term="payouts" /><category term="medication" /><category term="wrongful death" /><category term="fall" /><category term="2007" /><category term="nevada" /><category term="medical malpractice payments" /><category term="state" /><category term="disability discrimination" /><category term="andrew meyer" /><category term="obama" /><category term="health policy" /><category term="texas" /><category term="pharmaceutical" /><category term="medical apologies" /><category term="jury verdict" /><category term="baby" /><category term="north carolina" /><category term="statute of repose" /><category term="insurance" /><category term="aba" /><category term="new jersey" /><category term="malpractice cases" /><category term="california" /><category term="boston" /><category term="ma" /><category term="settlements" /><category term="medication error" /><category term="hospital" /><category term="legislation" /><category term="malpractice award" /><category term="bipolar disorder" /><category term="medical malpractice claims" /><category term="c-section" /><category term="romney" /><category term="tort reform" /><category term="brain injury" /><category term="utah" /><category term="cerebral palsy" /><category term="aortic aneurysm" /><category term="steroids" /><category term="va hospital" /><category term="maryland" /><category term="wrongful birth" /><category term="verdict" /><category term="defensive medicine" /><category term="bifurcate" /><category term="paid" /><category term="preemption" /><category term="open heart surgery" /><category term="illinois" /><category term="electronic" /><category term="minnesota" /><category term="cbs" /><category term="lawsuit" /><category term="antibiotics" /><category term="surgical checklists" /><category term="nh" /><category term="new york" /><category term="liability" /><category term="operating room" /><category term="indiana" /><category term="med mal" /><category term="prescription" /><category term="cost of health care" /><category term="nursing" /><category term="defibrillation" /><category term="birth injury" /><category term="research" /><category term="ohio" /><category term="appeal" /><category term="minneapolis" /><category term="health care reform" /><category term="act 649" /><category term="misdiagnosis" /><category term="pittsburgh" /><category term="medical errors" /><category term="high-low" /><category term="policies" /><category term="book" /><category term="west virginia" /><category term="apologies" /><category term="connecticut" /><category term="health department" /><category term="screening panel" /><category term="pennsylvania" /><category term="spleen" /><category term="florida" /><category term="medical malpractice caps" /><category term="lubin and meyer" /><category term="product liability" /><category term="wisconsin" /><category term="arizona" /><category term="jury" /><category term="largest verdict" /><category term="consumer information" /><category term="washington" /><category term="medication malpractice" /><title>Medical Malpractice Law News</title><subtitle type="html">All the medical malpractice news and resources that are fit to click</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>133</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MedicalMalpracticeLaw" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="medicalmalpracticelaw" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEUEQHg_fSp7ImA9WhBXGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-7105768944989288269</id><published>2013-04-02T07:30:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2013-04-02T07:30:01.645-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-02T07:30:01.645-04:00</app:edited><title>Connecticut Looks At Med Mal Review Law</title><summary>The CT Mirror reported yesterday that attorneys are pushing for changes in that state's medical malpractice lawsuit procedures, specifically in how cases come to court.

"Since 2005, a patient wanting to claim damages from a doctor for 
alleged negligence must have his or her case reviewed by a similar 
health care provider, who will certify whether the claim has merit. If 
the patient can't get </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/7105768944989288269/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=7105768944989288269&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/7105768944989288269?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/7105768944989288269?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2013/04/connecticut-looks-at-med-mal-review-law.html" title="Connecticut Looks At Med Mal Review Law" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkIGRXs5fyp7ImA9WhBXGEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-1733198605272810497</id><published>2013-04-01T13:37:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2013-04-01T15:28:44.527-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-01T15:28:44.527-04:00</app:edited><title>Missouri: House Passes Bill To Reinstate Med Mal Damage Caps</title><summary>As reported by St. Louis Public Radio, The Missouri House has passed Legislation to reinstate medical malpractice damage caps that was "tossed out last year by the Missouri Supreme Court." (The court found that the cap law violated a right to a jury trial.) You can link to the news item here on St. Louis Public Radio.

The Springfield News-Leader also carried this report, stating:

"The bill </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/1733198605272810497/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=1733198605272810497&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/1733198605272810497?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/1733198605272810497?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2013/04/missouri-house-passes-bill-to-reinstate.html" title="Missouri: House Passes Bill To Reinstate Med Mal Damage Caps" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEYGRH8zcCp7ImA9WhBQF00.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-3368793323234249168</id><published>2013-03-19T11:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2013-03-19T11:15:25.188-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-03-19T11:15:25.188-04:00</app:edited><title>Changes in State Medical Malpractice Laws</title><summary>We want to hear about changes to laws governning medical malpractice in your state. Please send news articles, press releases and links to maryrkennedy -at- gmail.com. Or, add information directly through our commenting system.

Here's a recent round-up:

Oregon - Governor Kitzhaber will sign a bill passed by the House where, through the Oregon Patient Safety Commission, patients
 and providers </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/3368793323234249168/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=3368793323234249168&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/3368793323234249168?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/3368793323234249168?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2013/03/changes-in-state-medical-malpractice.html" title="Changes in State Medical Malpractice Laws" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0QNRH05eCp7ImA9WhBTEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-636778277432349069</id><published>2013-02-04T14:03:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2013-02-04T14:16:35.320-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-02-04T14:16:35.320-05:00</app:edited><title>Medical Malpractice Payouts 2012 Data | Infographic</title><summary>
What do you think about this type of infographic? Is it a useful communications tool? Does it get across the point that is trying to be made? It is published by the Cunningham Group, and designed by SteamDriven. "Using data culled from multiple sources we compiled an over view of the 
payouts for medical malpractice awards based on 2011 and 2012 data." Could the publisher please provide the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/636778277432349069/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=636778277432349069&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/636778277432349069?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/636778277432349069?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2013/02/medical-malpractice-payouts-2012-data.html" title="Medical Malpractice Payouts 2012 Data | Infographic" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak4MQXg6eyp7ImA9WhNaFkg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-6573333003185236625</id><published>2013-01-31T14:03:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2013-01-31T14:03:00.613-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-01-31T14:03:00.613-05:00</app:edited><title>Select Tort Reform Summary State by State Since 1986</title><summary>An article published on Need to Know on PBS on changes to the medical malpractice system, included a table that summarized selected tort reforms enacted since 1986 and which states have enacted them. The reforms that it included are:

Modify Joint-and-Several Liability
Modify the Collateral-Source Rule
Limit Noneconomic Damages
Limit Punitive Damages 

Click here to read the article and view the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/6573333003185236625/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=6573333003185236625&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/6573333003185236625?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/6573333003185236625?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2013/01/select-tort-reform-summary-state-by.html" title="Select Tort Reform Summary State by State Since 1986" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkcNQH85eyp7ImA9WhNaE0Q.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-8859709197052743003</id><published>2013-01-28T13:34:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2013-01-28T13:34:51.123-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-01-28T13:34:51.123-05:00</app:edited><title>Massachusetts Medical Mistakes: Sorry Seems to Be The Hardest Word</title><summary>The Boston Globe Magazine yesterday ran an article that follows up on our previous post on the attempt in Massachusetts to control costs with its medical mistake DA&amp;O law (disclosure, apology and offer). The article by Dr. Darshak Sanghavi is headlined, Why is it so hard for doctors to apologize? Fixing a system built on blame and revenge will require bold ways of analyzing mistakes and a radical</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/8859709197052743003/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=8859709197052743003&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/8859709197052743003?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/8859709197052743003?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2013/01/massachusetts-medical-mistakes-sorry.html" title="Massachusetts Medical Mistakes: Sorry Seems to Be The Hardest Word" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEIGQX04fSp7ImA9WhJVEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-3401096293222818660</id><published>2012-08-28T08:22:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2012-08-28T08:22:00.335-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-08-28T08:22:00.335-04:00</app:edited><title>Massachusetts Passes Health Care Cost Control Bill</title><summary>

A newly enacted law in Massachusetts will adopt the "disclosure, apology and offer (DA&amp;O)" approach to help resolve malpractice cases. The Healthcare Cost Control Bill recently passed by the Massachusetts legislature and signed by Gov. Deval Patrick on August 6 contains specific language that facilitates a DA&amp;O approach to medical malpractice claims.Under the DA&amp;O model healthcare professionals</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/3401096293222818660/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=3401096293222818660&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/3401096293222818660?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/3401096293222818660?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2012/08/massachusetts-passes-health-care-cost.html" title="Massachusetts Passes Health Care Cost Control Bill" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUAEQX8-cCp7ImA9WhVWFU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-5451343077417453060</id><published>2012-04-27T07:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2012-04-27T07:55:00.158-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-04-27T07:55:00.158-04:00</app:edited><title>New Hampshire Considers Early Offer Settlement Bill</title><summary>
Former NH Superior Court and Supreme Court judge Chuck Douglas has weighed in on the controversial SB 406 a bill to provide "early offer" settlements as a way to expedite medical malpractice settlements. According to Douglas in an opinion piece in SeacoastOnline.com, the legislation,


"runs counter to the way we value life in this state. 
Under the proposal, a hospital or other provider can </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/5451343077417453060/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=5451343077417453060&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/5451343077417453060?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/5451343077417453060?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2012/04/new-hampshire-considers-early-offer.html" title="New Hampshire Considers Early Offer Settlement Bill" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUEHQ3Y9fyp7ImA9WhVWFEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-7868965364605692866</id><published>2012-04-25T19:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2012-04-26T19:40:32.867-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-04-26T19:40:32.867-04:00</app:edited><title>Mass. Hospitals Look To Promote Culture of Openess and Apologies Regarding Medical Errors</title><summary>A coalition of seven Massachusetts hospitals are undertaking an intiative to transform a culture of "secrecy and denial" regarding medical errors according to a report in The Boston Globe. The hospitals in the coalition include Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham, Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Milton, Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/7868965364605692866/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=7868965364605692866&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/7868965364605692866?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/7868965364605692866?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2012/04/mass-hospitals-look-to-promote-culture.html" title="Mass. Hospitals Look To Promote Culture of Openess and Apologies Regarding Medical Errors" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk8CQHw6fip7ImA9WhVREkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-7438701528495298618</id><published>2012-03-20T08:01:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2012-03-20T08:01:01.216-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-03-20T08:01:01.216-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="wrongful birth" /><title>Wrongful Birth Medical Malpractice Award is $2.9 Million in Oregon</title><summary>Usually when reporting medical malpractice verdicts and settlements it is the phrase 'wrongful death' that comes up, not 'wrongful birth'. But a rare 'wrongful birth' trial reached a conclusion for the parents of child who was born with Downs Syndrome claiming doctors for medical negligence in pre-natal care, in the amount of $2.9 million for the lifetime care of the child. See article on </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/7438701528495298618/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=7438701528495298618&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/7438701528495298618?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/7438701528495298618?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2012/03/wrongful-birth-medical-malpractice.html" title="Wrongful Birth Medical Malpractice Award is $2.9 Million in Oregon" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0ICRHwyfip7ImA9WhVREUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-4675069620218685259</id><published>2012-03-19T15:32:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2012-03-19T15:32:45.296-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-03-19T15:32:45.296-04:00</app:edited><title>State Lawmakers Blast House GOP's Medical Malpractice Reform Plan</title><summary>In today's The Hill's Healthwatch the article — State lawmakers blast House GOP's medical malpractice reform bill - mentions a letter from the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), expressing strong, bipartisan opposition to attaching federal medical malpractice legislation to the Medicare accountability bill as a "State's rights issue."
"Medical malpractice, product liability and </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/4675069620218685259/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=4675069620218685259&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/4675069620218685259?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/4675069620218685259?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2012/03/state-lawmakers-blast-house-gops.html" title="State Lawmakers Blast House GOP's Medical Malpractice Reform Plan" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEUFSH06fip7ImA9WhVSFU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-3791246984173313581</id><published>2012-03-11T18:46:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2012-03-11T18:50:19.316-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-03-11T18:50:19.316-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="medical malpractice" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="medical errors" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="medical mistake" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cbs" /><title>Sanjay Gupta Writes Novel on Inside World of Medicial Errors</title><summary>Every time surgeons operate, they're betting their skills are better than the brain tumor, the faulty heart valve, the fractured femur. Sometimes, they're wrong. At Chelsea General, surgeons answer for bad outcomes at the Morbidity and Mortality conference, known as M &amp; M. This extraordinary peek behind the curtain into what is considered the most secretive meeting in all of medicine is the back </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/3791246984173313581/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=3791246984173313581&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/3791246984173313581?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/3791246984173313581?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2012/03/sanjay-gupta-writes-novel-on-inside.html" title="Sanjay Gupta Writes Novel on Inside World of Medicial Errors" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-FiHe89-Jglo/T10pv5U9IJI/AAAAAAAAADE/TXytEc1ByQQ/s72-c/41gTjX3U68L._SL160_.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUYARHs5fip7ImA9WhRbFUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-2842456954816461267</id><published>2012-02-06T21:52:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-06T21:52:25.526-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-06T21:52:25.526-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="patient safety" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="consumer information" /><title>Patient Safety: How To Reduce Your Chance of a Medical Error</title><summary>Here’s what Consumer Reports and Dr. Peter Pronovost, senior vice  president for patient safety and quality at Johns Hopkins Medicine, say  patients can do to keep themselves safe when they go to a hospital.
Do your homework. Go to the Web sites Hospital Compare and the Joint Commission and look up hospitals in your Zip code. Based on that information, ask your doctor which ones they trust.
Ask a</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/2842456954816461267/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=2842456954816461267&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/2842456954816461267?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/2842456954816461267?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2012/02/patient-safety-how-to-reduce-your.html" title="Patient Safety: How To Reduce Your Chance of a Medical Error" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEEMRn05eyp7ImA9WhdVFEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-1216125726315161751</id><published>2011-09-19T13:18:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2011-09-19T13:18:07.323-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-09-19T13:18:07.323-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pennsylvania" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jury verdict" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="largest verdict" /><title>In Pennsylvania, $23 Million Jury Award for Woman Who Lost Both Legs Due to Infection</title><summary>Headlines out of Allentown, PA's The Morning Call, indicate a medical malpratice lawsuit by a woman who lost both legs due to infection while under care the care of a home care nurse, has been awarded $23 million by a jury. According to the report:
"The medical malpractice verdict, among the highest ever in the county,  came after attorneys [the plantiff] argued that her  home-care nurse failed </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/1216125726315161751/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=1216125726315161751&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/1216125726315161751?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/1216125726315161751?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/09/in-pennsylvania-23-million-jury-award.html" title="In Pennsylvania, $23 Million Jury Award for Woman Who Lost Both Legs Due to Infection" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0YMQ384fSp7ImA9WhdXGEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-9051525270459779435</id><published>2011-08-31T22:43:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2011-08-31T22:46:22.135-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-08-31T22:46:22.135-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jury award" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jury verdict" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="boston" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="newborn" /><title>Lubin &amp; Meyer: Boston Jury Verdict Is $11.48 Million with Interest</title><summary>Breaking news via Law Links Health Links: Lubin &amp; Meyer announced on its Twitter page tonight that they had won a jury verdict in a case involving the death of an 8-day old baby. After much searching and hand-ringing we found the first report providing more details on the case in the Boston Globe. According to a report in the White Coats Blog, the award was $7 million — $3.5 million for each </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/9051525270459779435/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=9051525270459779435&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/9051525270459779435?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/9051525270459779435?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/08/lubin-meyer-boston-jury-verdict-is-1148.html" title="Lubin &amp; Meyer: Boston Jury Verdict Is $11.48 Million with Interest" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkYARH08fip7ImA9WhdQF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-2734010077088613966</id><published>2011-08-19T09:10:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2011-08-19T09:22:25.376-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-08-19T09:22:25.376-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="study" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="specialties" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="malpractice cases" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="payouts" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="trends" /><title>Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Common, Payments Are Not</title><summary>Kaiser Health News reports on the findings of a study published this month by the New England Journal of Medicine suggesting that "only one in five malpractice lawsuits results in a payout. The authors conclude that the truth behind these numbers is complicated."

The study is Malpractice Risk According to Physician Specialty,                          Anupam B. Jena, M.D., Ph.D., Seth Seabury, </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/2734010077088613966/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=2734010077088613966&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/2734010077088613966?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/2734010077088613966?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/08/medical-malpractice-lawsuits-common.html" title="Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Common, Payments Are Not" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-dW6IapXFhBw/Tk5f7nf_yhI/AAAAAAAAADA/VzS68o_jCkE/s72-c/Screen+shot+2011-08-19+at+8.56.51+AM.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE8CQXkzeip7ImA9WhdTGUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-1294248978593372226</id><published>2011-07-18T08:41:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2011-07-18T08:41:00.782-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-07-18T08:41:00.782-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="new jersey" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="medical malpractice verdict" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="largest verdict" /><title>New Jersey: Largest Medical Malpractice Verdict in Orange County</title><summary>According to a report in the Times-Herald Record, an Orange County, New Jersey jury has reached a verdict in the case of a critical-care physician and nurse at Bon Secours Community Hospital accused of a medical error causing a woman to suffer a brain injury and became severely disabled. The jury's damage award includes $19.5 million for future medical and  rehabilitation services for the patient</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/1294248978593372226/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=1294248978593372226&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/1294248978593372226?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/1294248978593372226?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/07/new-jersey-largest-medical-malpractice.html" title="New Jersey: Largest Medical Malpractice Verdict in Orange County" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUICQX44fyp7ImA9WhdTGUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-953545415628181340</id><published>2011-07-17T10:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2011-07-17T10:39:20.037-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-07-17T10:39:20.037-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="illinois" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="hospital" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="insurance" /><title>McDonald Hopkins Files Federal Lawsuit Challenging Constitutionality of Illinois Law</title><summary>CHICAGO, IL — Hospital-based pathology groups and physicians in  Illinois have filed a federal lawsuit seeking to  invalidate, on constitutional grounds, Illinois legislation designed to  shift the burden of absorbing certain patient-related costs from  insurers to practitioners of only a few specifically-enumerated medical  specialties.  The Statute is Illinois Public Act 96-1523, and you can </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/953545415628181340/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=953545415628181340&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/953545415628181340?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/953545415628181340?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/07/mcdonald-hopkins-files-federal-lawsuit.html" title="McDonald Hopkins Files Federal Lawsuit Challenging Constitutionality of Illinois Law" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkYFSHs8fSp7ImA9WhdTEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-8389314859058858634</id><published>2011-07-08T16:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2011-07-08T16:48:39.575-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-07-08T16:48:39.575-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="medication error" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="electronic" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="prescription" /><title>Outpatient Electronic Prescribing Systems Don’t Cut Out Common Mistakes</title><summary>Outpatient electronic prescribing systems don’t cut out the common  mistakes made in manual systems, suggests research published online in  the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA).

And not all systems are the same: some perform worse than others, the study shows.

The rapid adoption of electronic prescribing systems has in part been  fuelled by the belief that they </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/8389314859058858634/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=8389314859058858634&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/8389314859058858634?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/8389314859058858634?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/07/outpatient-electronic-prescribing.html" title="Outpatient Electronic Prescribing Systems Don’t Cut Out Common Mistakes" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUQGQn86cSp7ImA9WhZXE0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-872735681070771173</id><published>2011-05-02T20:41:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2011-05-02T20:42:03.119-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-05-02T20:42:03.119-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="submit" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="medical malpractice" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="verdicts and settlements" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="settlements" /><title>Send Us News of Your Medical Malpractice Verdict or Settlement</title><summary>Medical Malpractice Law News seeks to aggregate news and trends on medical malpractice topics including mentions of significant settlements and trial verdicts in your state. Please forward news releases or a summary of key points with credible links to confirm your news. We will consider using your submissions, but reserve the right to edit or turn it down based on relevance to our audience and </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/872735681070771173/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=872735681070771173&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/872735681070771173?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/872735681070771173?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/05/send-us-news-of-your-medical.html" title="Send Us News of Your Medical Malpractice Verdict or Settlement" /><author><name>M Kennedy, Editor</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12038198296544009549</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEQER3w9eCp7ImA9WhZRE0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-3305641970012477064</id><published>2011-04-08T21:23:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2011-04-08T21:25:06.260-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-04-08T21:25:06.260-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jury award" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="california" /><title>California Jury Awards $4.5 Million</title><summary>A wrongful death medical malpractice trial that ended in a hung jury a year ago, this time ended in a jury awarding "...$3.5 million in general damages, including pain and suffering, and more than $1 million in economic damages," according to the Pasadena Star-News. See article: La Canada Flintridge physician loses medical malpractice case - Pasadena Star-News.</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/3305641970012477064/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=3305641970012477064&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/3305641970012477064?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/3305641970012477064?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/04/california-jury-awards-45-million.html" title="California Jury Awards $4.5 Million" /><author><name>Malpractice News Editor</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck4CRn0-eyp7ImA9WhZSEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-2689831066971443967</id><published>2011-03-26T10:48:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2011-03-26T10:49:27.353-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-03-26T10:49:27.353-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="medical malpractice caps" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="new york" /><title>Who Benefits from Medical Malpractice Caps, Doctors or Insurers?</title><summary>In an article about New York's debate over medical malpractice caps, the New York Times looks at California's experience with caps, writing:
"...states that have similar caps in place offer cautionary evidence  about the big savings for health care providers that such limits are  believed to produce.        

In 1975, California lawmakers approved a $250,000 cap on so-called  noneconomic damages </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/2689831066971443967/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=2689831066971443967&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/2689831066971443967?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/2689831066971443967?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/03/who-benefits-from-medical-malpractice.html" title="Who Benefits from Medical Malpractice Caps, Doctors or Insurers?" /><author><name>Malpractice News Editor</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkEGRn8zeSp7ImA9WhZTGEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-5799591809561808945</id><published>2011-03-22T16:42:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2011-03-22T22:50:27.181-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-03-22T22:50:27.181-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pennsylvania" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="never events" /><title>Pennsylvania Leader in Reporting 'Never Events'</title><summary>The Allentown, PA Morning Call published a lengthy article by Tim Darragh on wrong-site surgery in Pennsylvania. The report titled, 'Never events' happen dozens of times a year, starts with this lead in...
"More than five times a month, every month, a doctor in Pennsylvania  commits one of the medical establishment's greatest taboos —  working  on the wrong part of a patient's body, or even the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/5799591809561808945/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=5799591809561808945&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/5799591809561808945?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/5799591809561808945?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/03/pennsylvania-leader-in-reporting-never.html" title="Pennsylvania Leader in Reporting 'Never Events'" /><author><name>Malpractice News Editor</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkcHQ3w-fip7ImA9WhZTFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-1820687673041194903</id><published>2011-03-20T23:27:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2011-03-20T23:27:12.256-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-03-20T23:27:12.256-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="safe harbor" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="connecticut" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="legislation" /><title>In Connecticut, 'Safe Harbor' Language Causes Stir</title><summary>New London, Connecticut's Day.com carries an editorial by John Foley, a former cardiologist, regarding the importance of 'safe harbor' offered by adhering to evidence-based medicine practices. The state's SustiNet legislation recently had the safe harbor language remo which has physicians up in arms. Click here to read more on what's happening on this issue.</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/1820687673041194903/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=1820687673041194903&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/1820687673041194903?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/1820687673041194903?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/03/in-connecticut-safe-harbor-language.html" title="In Connecticut, 'Safe Harbor' Language Causes Stir" /><author><name>Malpractice News Editor</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkcAR3wzeyp7ImA9WhdQF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1208080764516391825.post-166232294995624664</id><published>2011-03-14T11:55:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2011-08-19T09:20:46.283-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-08-19T09:20:46.283-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="medical errors" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="hospital" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="boston" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="policies" /><title>Mass General Lawsuit Hopes To Change Internal Policies</title><summary>A recent lawsuit filed against Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston provides the family of a woman who died as the result of a medical error with an opportunity to push for changes in hospital policies. The family's attorney Drew Meyer said in a Fox News interview that what the family is pushing for "is some recognition by Mass General that they are changing their policies." See video below..</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/feeds/166232294995624664/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1208080764516391825&amp;postID=166232294995624664&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/166232294995624664?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1208080764516391825/posts/default/166232294995624664?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://medicalmalpracticelaw.blogspot.com/2011/03/mass-general-lawsuit-hopes-to-change.html" title="Mass General Lawsuit Hopes To Change Internal Policies" /><author><name>Malpractice News Editor</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
