<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Laika&#039;s MedLibLog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A medical librarians exploration of the web 2.0 world and beyond.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Laika&#039;s MedLibLog" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
	<item>
		<title>P C R : Publish, Cite Cyagen and get a Reward of $100 or more !?</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/p-c-r-publish-cite-cyagen-and-get-a-reward-of-100-or-more/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/p-c-r-publish-cite-cyagen-and-get-a-reward-of-100-or-more/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2015 16:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Citations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=14253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thursday I got an odd mail from Cyagen. Cyagen offered me $100 or more in reward for citing their animal model services in an article. Even more surprising the reward was dependent on the impact factor of the journal I was publishing in. Cyagen gives the following example: If you published a paper in Science (IF = 30) [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/p-c-r-publish-cite-cyagen-and-get-a-reward-of-100-or-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/cyagen-1-2015-08-15_14-51-18.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CYAGEN 1 2015-08-15_14-51-18</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/cyagen-2-2015-08-15_14-49-56.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CYAGEN 2 2015-08-15_14-49-56</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/cyagen-3-2015-08-15_14-32-01.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CYAGEN 3 2015-08-15_14-32-01</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media in Clinical Practice by Bertalan Meskó [Book Review]</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/social-media-in-clinical-practice-by-bertalan-mesko-book-review/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/social-media-in-clinical-practice-by-bertalan-mesko-book-review/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0 Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bertalan Meskó]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PubMed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=14198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How to review a book on Medical Social Media written by an author, who has learned you many Social Media skills himself? Thanks to people like Bertalan Meskó, the author of the book concerned,  I am not a novice in the field of Medical Social Media. But wouldn&#8217;t it be great if all newcomers in [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/social-media-in-clinical-practice-by-bertalan-mesko-book-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/12-9-2013-7-20-28-berci-examples-of-blogs.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Random ;) example of Examples respresented in a Table</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/12-9-2013-7-40-18-berci-facebook-patient.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">excerpt form &#034;Social Media in Clinical Practice&#034; p 42</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/12-9-2013-11-19-39-berci-example.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fig 3 </media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://scienceroll.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/978-1-4471-4305-5.jpg?w=347&#038;h=555&#038;h=555" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Foolery #55 Entrance to the Maternity Ward</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/26/friday-foolery-55-entrance-to-the-maternity-ward/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/26/friday-foolery-55-entrance-to-the-maternity-ward/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 21:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Friday Foolery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Takei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternity ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pushing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This Picture speaks for itself, I suppose Source: Facebook page of George Takei (link to picture) Related articles Leave it to Takei! (juliannrich.wordpress.com) George Takei&#8217;s Facebook Adventure Now Includes An Apologizing Ghostwriter (webpronews.com) Journalist apologizes to George Takei for revealing that he contributes Facebook items (jimromenesko.com) Friday Foolery #54 The Best 404 Message ever? (laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com) Friday [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/26/friday-foolery-55-entrance-to-the-maternity-ward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/26-7-2013-22-36-52-push-push.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">26-7-2013 22-36-52 PUSH PUSH</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Between the Lines. Finding the Truth in Medical Literature [Book Review]</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/between-the-lines-finding-the-truth-in-medical-literature-book-review/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/between-the-lines-finding-the-truth-in-medical-literature-book-review/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Based Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study Designs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=14153</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the 1970s a study was conducted among 60 physicians and physicians-in-training. They had to solve a simple problem: “If a test to detect a disease whose prevalence is 1/1000 has a false positive rate of 5 %, what is the chance that a person found to have a positive result actually has the disease, assuming that you know nothing about the person’s [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/between-the-lines-finding-the-truth-in-medical-literature-book-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/bwtn-the-lines.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bwtn the lines</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medpedia, the Medical Wikipedia, is Dead. And we Missed its Funeral&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/medpedia-the-medical-wikipedia-is-dead-and-we-missed-its-funeral/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/medpedia-the-medical-wikipedia-is-dead-and-we-missed-its-funeral/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 22:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumers and Patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Wiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medpedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Generated Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=14115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a post about Wikipedia in 2009 I suggested that initiatives like Ganfyd or Medpedia, might be a solution to Wikipedia&#8217;s accuracy and credibility problems, because only health experts are allowed to edit or contribute to the content of these knowledge bases. MedPedia is a more sophisticated platform than Ganfyd, which looks more like a simple [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/medpedia-the-medical-wikipedia-is-dead-and-we-missed-its-funeral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/11-7-2013-23-57-49-waybackmachine-medpedia.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">11-7-2013 23-57-49 waybackmachine medpedia</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, Google Scholar Shouldn&#8217;t be Used Alone for Systematic Review Searching</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/no-google-scholar-shouldnt-be-used-alone-for-systematic-review-searching/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/no-google-scholar-shouldnt-be-used-alone-for-systematic-review-searching/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 22:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Scholar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PubMed/MEDLINE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Researchblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Searching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematic Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PubMed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=14088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Several papers have addressed the usefulness of Google Scholar as a source for systematic review searching. Unfortunately the quality of those papers is often well below the mark. In 2010 I already [1]  (in the words of Isla Kuhn [2]) &#8220;robustly rebutted&#8221; the Anders&#8217; paper &#8220;PubMed versus Google Scholar for Retrieving Evidence&#8221; [3] at this blog. But [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/no-google-scholar-shouldnt-be-used-alone-for-systematic-review-searching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diane-35: Geen Reden tot Paniek!</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/03/12/diane-35-geen-reden-tot-paniek/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/03/12/diane-35-geen-reden-tot-paniek/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Dutch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gynecology & Obstetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harm & AE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Researchblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acne vulgaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anticonceptiemiddel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Combined oral contraceptive pill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyproterone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Medicines Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food and Drug Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lareb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrombosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrombus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trombose]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear english-speaking readers of this blog. This post is about the anti-acne drug Diane-35 that (with other 3rd and 4th generation combined oral contraceptives (COCs)) has been linked to the deaths of several women in Canada, France and the Netherlands. Since there is a lot of media attention (and panic) in the Netherlands, the remainder of this [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/03/12/diane-35-geen-reden-tot-paniek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/nlvlag.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/7-3-2013-15-48-49-risicos-pil.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Absolute en relatieve kans op VTE (Veneuze trombo-embolie)</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/10-3-2013-17-27-40-rcog-cpa.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">10-3-2013 17-27-40 RCOG CPA</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/3-3-2013-14-54-14-clinical-evidence-pcos-cyproterone-acetate.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Clinical Evidence: effects of treatmentsto reduce hirsutism in women with PCOS</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/10-3-2013-22-43-02-ned-vereniging-voor-dermatologie.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">10-3-2013 22-43-02 ned vereniging voor dermatologie</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/11-3-2013-23-27-37-reactie-dermatologen-21.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">11-3-2013 23-27-37 reactie dermatologen 2</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/12-3-2013-0-57-27-reactie-patient.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">12-3-2013 0-57-27 reactie patient</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Mice and Men Again: New Genomic Study Helps Explain why Mouse Models of Acute Inflammation do not Work in Men</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/of-mice-and-men-again-new-genomic-study-helps-explain-why-mouse-models-of-acute-inflammation-do-not-work-in-men/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/of-mice-and-men-again-new-genomic-study-helps-explain-why-mouse-models-of-acute-inflammation-do-not-work-in-men/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Researchblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflammation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microarrays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mouse Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Researchblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma (medicine)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This post is update after a discussion at Twitter with @animalevidence who pointed me at a great blog post at Speaking of Research ([19], a repost of [20], highlighting the shortcomings of the current study using just one single inbred strain of mice (C57Bl6)  [2013-02-26]. Main changes are in blue A recent paper published in PNAS [1] [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/of-mice-and-men-again-new-genomic-study-helps-explain-why-mouse-models-of-acute-inflammation-do-not-work-in-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.researchblogging.org/public/citation_icons/rb2_large_gray.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ResearchBlogging.org</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/04/PCWmice1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dick mouse</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BAD Science or BAD Science Journalism? &#8211; A Response to Daniel Lakens</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/bad-science-or-bad-science-journalism-a-response-to-daniel-lakens/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/bad-science-or-bad-science-journalism-a-response-to-daniel-lakens/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Researchblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applied cognitive psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delinquency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science journalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vandalism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Two weeks ago  there was a hot debate among Dutch Tweeps on &#8220;bad science, bad science journalism and bad science communication&#8220;. This debate was started and fueled by different Dutch blog posts on this topic.[1,4-6] A controversial post, with both fierce proponents and fierce opposition was the post by Daniel Lakens [1], an assistant professor [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/bad-science-or-bad-science-journalism-a-response-to-daniel-lakens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.researchblogging.org/public/citation_icons/rb2_large_gray.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ResearchBlogging.org</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd051809s.gif" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/7-2-2013-23-26-31-media-science.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">7-2-2013 23-26-31 media &#038; science</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Foolery #54 The Best 404 Message ever?</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/friday-foolery-54-the-best-404-message-ever/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/friday-foolery-54-the-best-404-message-ever/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Friday Foolery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[404]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13716</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[claimtoken-510ebd2ada419 Somebody send me a direct message via Twitter, asking me if he had missed any posts. Sorting his Google Reader feeds, he saw this blog was last updated October. And he is right :(. Just to assure you that this blog is not dead, but hibernating*, I would like to link to perhaps the BEST 404 [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/friday-foolery-54-the-best-404-message-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Publishing in the NEJM is not the Best Guarantee that Something is True: a Response to Katan</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/10/27/why-publishing-in-the-nejm-is-not-the-best-guarantee-that-something-is-true-a-response-to-katan/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/10/27/why-publishing-in-the-nejm-is-not-the-best-guarantee-that-something-is-true-a-response-to-katan/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Researchblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citatation bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[england journal of medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martijn Katan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEJM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Journal of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publication Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a previous post [1] I reviewed a recent  Dutch study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM [2] about the effects of sugary drinks on the body mass index of school children. The study got widely covered by the media. The NRC, for which the main author Martijn Katan works as a science columnist, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/10/27/why-publishing-in-the-nejm-is-not-the-best-guarantee-that-something-is-true-a-response-to-katan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.researchblogging.org/public/citation_icons/rb2_large_gray.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ResearchBlogging.org</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Foolery #53 : Variations on the Cochrane Logo &#038; Farewell from the #Cochraneauckland Colloquium.</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/friday-foolery-53-farewell-from-the-cochraneauckland-colloquium/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/friday-foolery-53-farewell-from-the-cochraneauckland-colloquium/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cochrane Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference/Meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Foolery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cochrane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cochrane Colloquium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cochrane Logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colloquium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lol]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Two weeks ago the annual Cochrane Colloquium was held in Auckland, New Zealand. Unfortunately I wasn&#8217;t there, but I followed the tweets (see Storify for a selection). And for a more in depth coverage: the webcasts of the plenary sessions are still online here. The Cochrane Logo is very recognizable and stereotype and therefore well chosen. I&#8216;ve explained the details [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/friday-foolery-53-farewell-from-the-cochraneauckland-colloquium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/15-10-2012-21-34-58-cochrane-colloquium.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">15-10-2012 21-34-58 cochrane colloquium</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/18-10-2012-23-42-29-cochrane-logos.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">18-10-2012 23-42-29 cochrane logo&#039;s</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/15-10-2012-20-29-51-cochrane-logo.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">15-10-2012 20-29-51 cochrane logo</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/18-10-2012-23-38-53cochrane-logo-wybertje-2.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">18-10-2012 23-38-53cochrane logo wybertje 2</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/15-10-2012-21-13-29-mm-cochrane-logo.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">15-10-2012 21-13-29 M&#038;M cochrane logo</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/23-9-2012-15-00-42-olvg-ebm-logo.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">23-9-2012 15-00-42 OLVG EBM logo</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silly Sunday #52 Online Education Sites: and the Spam Goes on.</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/silly-sunday-52-online-education-sites-and-the-spam-goes-on/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/silly-sunday-52-online-education-sites-and-the-spam-goes-on/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Foolery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accreditedonlinecolleges.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elearning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onlinedegrees.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On many occasions  (here, here, here and here [1-4), I have warned against top 50 and 100 lists made by online education sites, like  accreditedonlinecolleges.com, onlinecolleges.com. They are no more than splogs and link bait scams. Thus please don&#8217;t give them credit by linking to their sites. I have also mentioned that people affiliated with these sites sometimes offer to write guest posts. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/silly-sunday-52-online-education-sites-and-the-spam-goes-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/14-10-2012-22-49-30-mails-blogposts.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">14-10-2012 22-49-30 mails blogposts</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sugary Drinks as the Culprit in Childhood Obesity? a RCT among Primary School Children</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/09/24/sugary-drinks-as-the-culprit-in-childhood-obesity-a-rct-among-primary-school-children/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/09/24/sugary-drinks-as-the-culprit-in-childhood-obesity-a-rct-among-primary-school-children/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Researchblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[childhood obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dutch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soft drink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sugar-sweetened beverages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13515</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Childhood obesity is a growing health problem. Since 1980, the proportion of overweighted children has almost tripled in the USA:  nowadays approximately 17% of children and adolescents are obese.  (Source: cdc.gov [6]) Common sense tells me that obesity is the result of too high calory intake without sufficient physical activity.&#8221; &#8211; which is just what [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/09/24/sugary-drinks-as-the-culprit-in-childhood-obesity-a-rct-among-primary-school-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.researchblogging.org/public/citation_icons/rb2_large_gray.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ResearchBlogging.org</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/4457372401_75be9fc7e4_n.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">4457372401_75be9fc7e4_n</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/24-9-2012-23-09-14-blikkie-drink.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">24-9-2012 23-09-14 Blikkie DRINK</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/11-10-2012-17-40-25-rct-katan-nejm-change-in-trial-outcome-parameters.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">11-10-2012 17-40-25 RCT Katan NEJM change in trial outcome parameters</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>#EAHIL2012 CEC 1: Drupal for Librarians</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/07/05/eahil2012-cec-1-drupal-for-librarians/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/07/05/eahil2012-cec-1-drupal-for-librarians/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dries Buytaert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drupal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endnote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning management system]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This week I’m blogging at (and mostly about) the 13th EAHIL conference in Brussels. EAHIL stands for European Association for Health Information and Libraries. I already blogged about the second Continuing Education Course (CEC) I followed, but I followed a continuing education course at Mondays, one day earlier. That session was led by Patrice Chalon, who is a Knowledge Manager at KCE &#8211; [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/07/05/eahil2012-cec-1-drupal-for-librarians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/5-7-2012-10-20-40-drupal-cochrane.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">5-7-2012 10-20-40 drupal cochrane</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>#EAHIL2012 CEC 2: Visibility &#038; Impact – Library’s New Role to Enhance Visibility of Researchers</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/07/04/eahil2012-cec-2-visibility-impact-librarys-new-role-to-enhance-visibility-of-researchers/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/07/04/eahil2012-cec-2-visibility-impact-librarys-new-role-to-enhance-visibility-of-researchers/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medical Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altmetric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altmetrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CiteULike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connotea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mendeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORCID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinterest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SciVee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Helsinki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0 tools]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This week I&#8217;m blogging at (and mostly about) the 13th EAHIL conference in Brussels. EAHIL stands for European Association for Health Information and Libraries. The second Continuing Education Course (CEC) I followed was given by Tiina Heino and Katri Larmo of the Terkko Meilahti Campus Library at the University of Helsinki in Finland. The full title [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/07/04/eahil2012-cec-2-visibility-impact-librarys-new-role-to-enhance-visibility-of-researchers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/4-7-2012-10-07-47-tools-to-get-your-work-noticed.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">4-7-2012 10-07-47 tools to get your work noticed</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/4-7-2012-10-44-14-altmetric-1-75-trials.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">4-7-2012 10-44-14 altmetric 1 75 trials</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/4-7-2012-10-51-14-altmetrics-3-blogs.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">4-7-2012 10-51-14 altmetrics 3 blogs</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Foolery #51 Statistically Funny</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/friday-foolery-51-statistically-funny/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/friday-foolery-51-statistically-funny/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Evidence Based Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Foolery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilda Bastian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Epidemiologists, people working in the EBM field and, above all, statisticians are said to have no sense of humor.* Hilda Bastian is a clear exception to this rule. I met Hilda a few years ago at a Cochrane colloquium. At that time she was working as a consumer advocate in Australia. Nowadays she is editor and [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/friday-foolery-51-statistically-funny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/over-diagnosis.jpg?w=262" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even the Scientific American Blog Links to Spammy Online Education Affiliate Sites&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/even-the-scientific-american-blog-links-to-spammy-online-education-affiliate-sites/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/even-the-scientific-american-blog-links-to-spammy-online-education-affiliate-sites/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accreditedonlinecolleges.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onlinedegrees.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splogs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On numerous occasions [1,2,3] I have warned against top Twitter and Blog lists spread by education affiliate sites. Sites like accreditedonlinecolleges.com, onlinecolleges.com, onlinecollegesusa.org, onlinedegrees.com, mbaonline.com. While some of the published Twitter Top 50 lists and Blog top 100 lists may be interesting as such (or may flatter you if you&#8217;re on it), the only intention of [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/even-the-scientific-american-blog-links-to-spammy-online-education-affiliate-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Scatter of Medical Research and What to do About it.</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/05/18/the-scatter-of-medical-research-and-what-to-do-about-it/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/05/18/the-scatter-of-medical-research-and-what-to-do-about-it/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Clinical Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Based Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PubMed/MEDLINE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Researchblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematic Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cochrane Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Subject Headings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PubMed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randomized Controlled Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Searching]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Paul Glasziou, GP and professor in Evidence Based Medicine, co-authored a new article in the BMJ [1]. Similar to another paper [2] I discussed before [3] this paper deals with the difficulty for clinicians of staying up-to-date with the literature. But where the previous paper [2,3] highlighted the mere increase in number of research articles over time, the current paper [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/05/18/the-scatter-of-medical-research-and-what-to-do-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.researchblogging.org/public/citation_icons/rb2_large_gray.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ResearchBlogging.org</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.bmj.com/highwire/filestream/585230/field_highwire_fragment_image_l/0/F2.medium.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Click to enlarge en see legends</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/18-5-2012-0-59-45-top-10-journals-endo1.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">18-5-2012 0-59-45 TOP 10 journals ENDO</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/17-5-2012-22-12-24-1e-5-its-endo.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">17-5-2012 22-12-24 1e 5 its endo</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/18-5-2012-1-59-54-ma-5.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">18-5-2012 1-59-54 mA 5</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Guidelines Harm Patients?</title>
		<link>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/can-guidelines-harm-patients/</link>
					<comments>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/can-guidelines-harm-patients/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 21:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Evidence Based Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Researchblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conditions and Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Based Guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guideline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Levels of Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protocols]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Recently I saw an intriguing &#8220;personal view&#8221; in the BMJ written by Grant Hutchison entitled: &#8220;Can Guidelines Harm Patients Too?&#8221; Hutchison is a consultant anesthetist with -as he calls it- chronic guideline fatigue syndrome. Hutchison underwent an acute exacerbation of his &#8220;condition&#8221; with the arrival of another set of guidelines in his email inbox. Hutchison: On reviewing the level [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/can-guidelines-harm-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c115cecdf094ecdfd61ea14e2ae21f320df003b0b49c12e0ffb0ac2434bc610b?s=96&#38;d=monsterid&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">laikaspoetnik</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.researchblogging.org/public/citation_icons/rb2_large_gray.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ResearchBlogging.org</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/triad.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">triad EBM Sackett</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/guidelines-levels-of-evidence1-5-2012-19-54-35.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">GUIDELINES levels of evidence1-5-2012 19-54-35</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
