<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>John Nack on Adobe -- Comments</title>
      <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:42:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
      <item>
         <title>ugg outlet said: Thanks for your post!!!</title>
         <description>
           ugg outlet said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your post!!!</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/08/feedback_please_task-based_workspaces_in_ps.html">Feedback, please: Task-based workspaces in Photoshop</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/08/feedback_please_task-based_workspaces_in_ps.html#comment-2107131</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/08/feedback_please_task-based_workspaces_in_ps.html#comment-2107131</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:35:42 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>ugg outlet said: Thanks for your nice post!!!</title>
         <description>
           ugg outlet said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your nice post!!!</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2006/12/whats_up_with_the_icon.html">What's up with the new Photoshop icon & branding?</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2006/12/whats_up_with_the_icon.html#comment-2107128</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2006/12/whats_up_with_the_icon.html#comment-2107128</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:32:15 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lars said: i think adobe should concentrate on mobile apps and maybe photoshop and let other developer create a</title>
         <description>
           Lars said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>i think adobe should concentrate on mobile apps and maybe photoshop and let other developer create applications for photographers.</p>

<p>capture ones image quality  is so much better then lighrooms!!</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html">Photoshop.com Mobile comes to Android</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html#comment-2107105</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html#comment-2107105</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:10:42 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Glb uae  said: <![CDATA[that is very nice but i have quistion how can we ues this tool with photoshop8?

<i>[I'm never qui]]></title>
         <description>
           Glb uae  said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>that is very nice but i have quistion how can we ues this tool with photoshop8?</p>

<p><i>[I'm never quite sure whether questions like this are serious.  It's like saying, "Oh, the new 2010 Accord is more powerful and fuel efficient?  Great, but how do I get that in my '93 Accord?"  --J.]</i></p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/10/video_new_from_adobe_labs_content-aware_fill.html">Video: New from Adobe Labs, Content-Aware Fill in Photoshop</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/10/video_new_from_adobe_labs_content-aware_fill.html#comment-2107098</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/10/video_new_from_adobe_labs_content-aware_fill.html#comment-2107098</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:02:00 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Bart said: Having to get a layers Id without having to load the layer descriptor would be nice, as would gettin</title>
         <description>
           Bart said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>Having to get a layers Id without having to load the layer descriptor would be nice, as would getting the layer from its Id without selecting it at the same time. </p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/08/linked_smart_objects_kinda.html">Linked Smart Objects (kinda)</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/08/linked_smart_objects_kinda.html#comment-2107089</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/08/linked_smart_objects_kinda.html#comment-2107089</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:23:23 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Susan Kuypers said: Hi Jack,

Love the map.  Does it refresh automatically when the statistics are updated?

Susan</title>
         <description>
           Susan Kuypers said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack,</p>

<p>Love the map.  Does it refresh automatically when the statistics are updated?</p>

<p>Susan</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/illustrator_map_data_interactive_flash.html">Illustrator + Map Data = Interactive Flash</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/illustrator_map_data_interactive_flash.html#comment-2107088</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/illustrator_map_data_interactive_flash.html#comment-2107088</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:17:28 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Bud said: Is the pict still visible?I cant see it</title>
         <description>
           Bud said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>Is the pict still visible?I cant see it</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/05/keepin_it_real.html">Keepin' it real... hostile</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/05/keepin_it_real.html#comment-2107085</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/05/keepin_it_real.html#comment-2107085</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:04:51 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Lisa Kribs said: Thanks for the link share from the folks over at Fuel Your Branding!</title>
         <description>
           Lisa Kribs said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link share from the folks over at Fuel Your Branding!</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/10/rt_illustration_martians_killers_and_more.html">(rt) Illustration: Martians, killers, and more</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/10/rt_illustration_martians_killers_and_more.html#comment-2107082</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/10/rt_illustration_martians_killers_and_more.html#comment-2107082</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:34:42 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RedaLeBlanc said: Guys, my only problem with photoshop CS4 is when I use the font tool cause a crash immediately. Can </title>
         <description>
           RedaLeBlanc said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>Guys, my only problem with photoshop CS4 is when I use the font tool cause a crash immediately. Can Anybody see a solution for this ? Thank you and sorry for my bad english ;)</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/a_few_problems_found_with_ps_sl.html">A few problems found with Photoshop & Snow Leopard</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/a_few_problems_found_with_ps_sl.html#comment-2107066</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/a_few_problems_found_with_ps_sl.html#comment-2107066</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:34:37 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Uwe said: great .... adobe makes apps for mobile noobs.

but adobe is still unable to be on par with capture</title>
         <description>
           Uwe said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>great .... adobe makes apps for mobile noobs.</p>

<p>but adobe is still unable to be on par with capture one when it comes to image quality, tethered shooting.</p>

<p><i>[Can you demonstrate this quality difference you talk about?  Or will you, like everyone who's asserted such differences using fake email addresses, fail to back up your claims?  --J.]</i></p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html">Photoshop.com Mobile comes to Android</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html#comment-2107057</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html#comment-2107057</guid>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:05:06 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>hair extensions said: So disappointed ...i can&apos;t find it..</title>
         <description>
           hair extensions said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>So disappointed ...i can't find it..</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html">Photoshop.com Mobile comes to Android</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html#comment-2107031</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html#comment-2107031</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:51:51 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Nomad said: At present the app is, like the iPhone version, available only in the US and Canada. I know that&apos;s f</title>
         <description>
           Nomad said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>At present the app is, like the iPhone version, available only in the US and Canada. I know that's frustrating, and the team is working hard to make the app available more broadly.</p>

<p><br />
TWO BIG MIDDLE FINGERS!!!</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html">Photoshop.com Mobile comes to Android</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html#comment-2107023</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/photoshopcom_mobile_comes_to_android.html#comment-2107023</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:37:44 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>jeharris said: rc - update your nvidia display drivers.</title>
         <description>
           jeharris said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>rc - update your nvidia display drivers.</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/02/photoshop_cs4_u_1.html">Photoshop CS4 update now available</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/02/photoshop_cs4_u_1.html#comment-2106998</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/02/photoshop_cs4_u_1.html#comment-2106998</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:30:51 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>rc said: I&apos;m I the only one who hates the way CS4 displays a partial &apos;circle&apos; for a brsh shape when you get i</title>
         <description>
           rc said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>I'm I the only one who hates the way CS4 displays a partial 'circle' for a brsh shape when you get into bigger sizes? is there a work-around I'm missing? thanks</p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/02/photoshop_cs4_u_1.html">Photoshop CS4 update now available</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/02/photoshop_cs4_u_1.html#comment-2106982</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/02/photoshop_cs4_u_1.html#comment-2106982</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:35:34 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Rich MacDonald said: Keep getting excited about the idea of making my own panels, but I always give up after seeing how c</title>
         <description>
           Rich MacDonald said: <br /><br />
           <![CDATA[<p>Keep getting excited about the idea of making my own panels, but I always give up after seeing how complex the process seems.  Why not allow panels with HTML, CSS, and Javascript (like Dashboard)?  </p>

<p><i>[We will.  --J.]</i></p>

<p>Keep Flash around and see what people prefer.  To me, Flex + Flash + XML seems too complex.  Makes the C++ plug in route seem not much more involved.</p>

<p><i>[It *is* too complex right now, and help is on the way.  One step at a time.  --J.]</i></p>]]><br /><br />
           on the entry <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/extending_the_suite.html">Videos: Extending the Suite</a>
         </description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/extending_the_suite.html#comment-2106973</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/11/extending_the_suite.html#comment-2106973</guid>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:14:55 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>