<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 17:35:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Buffett and Siegel</category><category>Past 30 Days</category><category>Best 7 Days</category><category>Welcome to the Blog</category><category>Investing vs. Banking</category><category>Taxpayers on the hook ...Big</category><category>Where we are/Where we stay</category><category>Magic Tricks</category><category>April Rally</category><title>James Wilson's Blog</title><description>Observations and Perspective about Economics and Personal Finance</description><link>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>242</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/JamesWilsonsBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="jameswilsonsblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><itunes:owner><itunes:email>noreply@blogger.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Observations and Perspective about Economics and Personal Finance</itunes:subtitle><feedburner:emailServiceId>JamesWilsonsBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-2510283361243000039</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-15T12:09:27.143-04:00</atom:updated><title>New Blog and Website</title><description>Our new website &lt;a href="http://www.jewilson.com"&gt;www.jewilson.com&lt;/a&gt; has been launched!  We have integrated &lt;a href="http://www.jewilson.com/category/jwilsonblog/"&gt;our blog &lt;/a&gt;to this site and all new postings will be there.  We encourage you to&lt;a href="http://www.jewilson.com/feed/rss/"&gt; subscribe&lt;/a&gt; to our blog as well.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;You can access our blog &lt;a href="http://www.jewilson.com/category/jwilsonblog/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-2510283361243000039?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/Olt7lLe-X9Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/Olt7lLe-X9Y/new-blog-and-website.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/new-blog-and-website.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-4640645312897868585</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-15T07:08:54.971-04:00</atom:updated><title>The Organic Economy</title><description>one of the &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904060604576570821884273638.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_BelowLEFTSecond"&gt;best articles I have seen in months today in WSJ &lt;/a&gt;on "the two economies" in Obama's head. He contends that , to the President, the private economy is not the real one but is instead an intellectual abstraction. Lack of a core understanding of what an organic economy is and what makes it tick seems to be central to the policy choices. Very good read.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-4640645312897868585?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/MZcrMGZvxoQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/MZcrMGZvxoQ/organic-economy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/organic-economy.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-8365819579323011832</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-12T14:31:52.962-04:00</atom:updated><title>Greek Default? Really?</title><description>Came across this piece written a few months back on&lt;a href="http://www.goldalert.com/2011/06/100-chance-of-greek-default-says-niall-ferguson/"&gt; Niall Ferguson's views on Greece.&lt;/a&gt; As he points out, over the past 200 years or so Greece has been in and out of default several times. This isn't  a novel event. Yet most of the "explanations" today by the talking heads say fear of Greece defaulting (again) are to blame for the lackluster markets. Hmmm, really??&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-8365819579323011832?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/KFRxpRQljjU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/KFRxpRQljjU/greek-default-really.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/greek-default-really.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-1645977049350574729</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-12T10:17:26.628-04:00</atom:updated><title>Large Scale Mortgage Refinancing Results</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/kinks-in-obamas-home-refinancing-plans/"&gt;Some good,thoughtful analysis by CBO&lt;/a&gt; on the outcomes of large mortgage re-financing programs. It does not surprise me in the least that the analysis concludes that the benefits (gains) of such schemes  by a few, roughly equal the losses for the many . We have tried 5 major programs in less than 3 years and still the housing markets continues downward. Maybe it is time to let the market clear and find a bottom so we can move forward .&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-1645977049350574729?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/AJSpuueJNiM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/AJSpuueJNiM/large-scale-mortgage-refinancing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/large-scale-mortgage-refinancing.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-6759241798748493749</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-12T10:43:59.870-04:00</atom:updated><title>Tax Policy History</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2011/09/08/soak-the-rich-taxes-soak-everyone/"&gt;A very interesting and brief piece on the history of soak the rich tax policies&lt;/a&gt; . As the author points out , most taxes start out reaching only a few then rapidly expand to reach most.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-6759241798748493749?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/-UKXistDAV4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/-UKXistDAV4/tax-policy-history.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/tax-policy-history.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-993021682642123430</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-11T09:35:08.287-04:00</atom:updated><title>Classic John Bogle</title><description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904103404576560913892680574.html?mod=WSJ_Markets_LEFTTopStories"&gt;A truly outstanding article by Jason Zweig in WSJ&lt;/a&gt; on the equity markets,buy and hold, diversification and even gold. Bogle is without peer in his steadfastness. As he says diversification is not just the first thing investors should think about, but also the 2nd and 3rd and 4th thing.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-993021682642123430?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/UV4i6GK5eWk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/UV4i6GK5eWk/classic-john-bogle.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/classic-john-bogle.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-6322701568263295975</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-09T11:39:37.598-04:00</atom:updated><title>Conjour</title><description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904836104576558931723540102.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop"&gt;An article in WSJ gets the award&lt;/a&gt; for great phrasing today. Writing about the jobs plan outlined last night by President Obama ,they use the words "the government conjurer". Basically this means the government is acting as a magician , creating something (jobs) out of thin air. Well done.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-6322701568263295975?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/Ll3iS_Q_xsY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/Ll3iS_Q_xsY/conjour.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/conjour.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-7343887697491519748</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-09T09:00:15.410-04:00</atom:updated><title>What Now?  (Part Two)</title><description>The next issue of our, &lt;a href="http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs060/1102923280857/archive/1103413578995.html"&gt;bi -weekly newsletter&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs060/1102923280857/archive/1103413578995.html"&gt;STAT&lt;/a&gt; is available. You can access it &lt;a href="http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs060/1102923280857/archive/1107514873138.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. If you'd like to receive our email newsletter, you can click the "Sign up for our Email Newsletter" link on the right of this page.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-7343887697491519748?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/jOLS66ejRC8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/jOLS66ejRC8/what-now-part-two.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/what-now-part-two.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-1868258380319341382</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-09T07:14:31.917-04:00</atom:updated><title>Because it's Tuesday</title><description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904836104576558102073141210.html?mod=WSJ_Markets_LEFTTopStories"&gt;This brief article is a good example&lt;/a&gt; of what we call "Because it's Tuesday". That is, the explanation for short term price movements (noise) in the markets. In this piece, the writer says "investor anxiety" is the reason. Really? How do they know?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-1868258380319341382?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/kw11lq1Tq8c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/kw11lq1Tq8c/because-its-tuesday.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/because-its-tuesday.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-4969596024490798139</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-08T07:45:32.483-04:00</atom:updated><title>Job Creation</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-08/a-layman-s-guide-to-the-president-s-jobs-speech-caroline-baum.html"&gt;This is an excellent article&lt;/a&gt; by Caroline Baum on the role of government in job creation. As she states "the job of government is to provide an environment in which the private sector creates this (jobs)". Well put.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-4969596024490798139?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/TfEfruAfeNE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/TfEfruAfeNE/job-creation.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/job-creation.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-7436453552502562154</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-07T06:30:28.207-04:00</atom:updated><title>Debt &amp; Savings</title><description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904233404576460020958393028.html?mod=markets_newsreel"&gt;A very good summary of the debt issues facing those nearing retirement age&lt;/a&gt;. If anything, the percentages of folks in their 60's with substantial mortgage debt exceed those outlined in the article. 20 years ago almost none of our clients that age had mortgages, today it is the rule. As the article points out, this age group in general has too much debt and too little savings. Not much of a formula for an enjoyable retirement.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-7436453552502562154?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/y1k6hK1ftUw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/y1k6hK1ftUw/debt-savings.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/debt-savings.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-3097538213877158237</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-06T07:27:00.530-04:00</atom:updated><title>Hysteria and Hyperbole</title><description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903648204576552191506303816.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLETopStories"&gt;This is a good example of the near hysteria of journalists&lt;/a&gt; "reporting" on the markets. The writer makes some good points but sets them within the context of the markets coming off the worst August in a decade (a good deal of volatility in both directions) and entering historically the worst month of the year. Why does any of that really matter except we need the volatility in order to accrue the long term returns. The "what to do now" syndrome seems to dominate the media at present much to the detriment of most investors.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-3097538213877158237?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/yIAp9niK1y0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/yIAp9niK1y0/hysteria-and-hyperbole.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/hysteria-and-hyperbole.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-2143864985926670546</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-05T11:02:39.655-04:00</atom:updated><title>Infrastructure Spending and Priorities</title><description>&lt;a href="http://cafehayek.com/2011/09/crumbling.html"&gt;An interesting 2008 chart from NYT on infrastructure spending&lt;/a&gt;. Looks like $ is not the problem, politics is (big surprise). Economics centers around choices. When we make poor choices, resources are allocated improperly to one area to the detriment of another area.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-2143864985926670546?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/ug0ADUP0QAk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/ug0ADUP0QAk/infrastructure-spending-and-priorities.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/infrastructure-spending-and-priorities.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-1206014328023917314</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-05T08:00:45.706-04:00</atom:updated><title>Of Men and Markets</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/04/business/economy/on-wall-st-a-keynesian-beauty-contest.html?_r=2"&gt;Professor Shiller provides an interesting perspective&lt;/a&gt; in this article. As he notes, despite the evidence to the contrary, many investors practice the "beauty contest" approach.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-1206014328023917314?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/Hj1GtGdsxAA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/Hj1GtGdsxAA/of-men-and-markets.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/09/of-men-and-markets.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-4582596918369518718</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-31T08:26:46.878-04:00</atom:updated><title>Bond and Gold Bubbles</title><description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904875404576532921735664998.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion"&gt;David Malpass writes in WSJ today about the broad bond and gold bubbles.&lt;/a&gt; Think about this, Treasuries had the best month (of price gains-meaning yields falling) in over 3 years in the very month U.S. debt was downgraded. As Malpass points out, both gold and bonds have a "fear factor" component and this may account for a large portion of the current price movement. &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-4582596918369518718?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/u8XoE_lRSTY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/u8XoE_lRSTY/bond-and-gold-bubbles.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/bond-and-gold-bubbles.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-3411626939584184941</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-30T07:43:37.774-04:00</atom:updated><title>An Unusual Economy?</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/08/30/an_unusual_economy_111126.html"&gt;Professor Sowell dispenses some wisdom&lt;/a&gt; on the economy and uncertainty. He quite correctly notes that the unknown costs of Obamacare are already sending chilling signals to businesses otherwise ready to hire. &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-3411626939584184941?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/ROQfOX1KWF0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/ROQfOX1KWF0/unusual-economy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/unusual-economy.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-1614025964301086478</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-29T09:57:09.392-04:00</atom:updated><title>State Finances</title><description>&lt;a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052702303545104576524533718027022.html?mod=BOL_hpp_highlight_top#articleTabs_panel_article%3D1"&gt;Barron's has a great cover article &lt;/a&gt; with a useful chart comparing the AAA and AA+ state finances. S.C. has the 5th highest Federal spending as a % of GDP at 24.9%. The range is 10.6% (Delaware) to 29.8% (Virginia). S.C. also is in the top handful in Medicaid spending as a % of outlays with 22%. The range here is even wider with Wyoming @ 7% and N.C. with 37%! &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-1614025964301086478?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/r4G4uSv5QYc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/r4G4uSv5QYc/state-finances.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/state-finances.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-1881430753067743190</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-29T09:31:50.008-04:00</atom:updated><title>The Coming Fannie/Freddie Boondoggle</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obama-refinance-plan-sows-seeds-for-another-bailout/"&gt;A brief, concise summary of a really bad idea&lt;/a&gt; . Maybe it won't actually happen but several trial balloons were sent last week so it looks likely. More intervention won't help housing finance.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-1881430753067743190?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/fmXPk_BhfO8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/fmXPk_BhfO8/coming-fanniefreddie-boondoggle.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/coming-fanniefreddie-boondoggle.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-4968736913077924502</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-29T08:23:39.330-04:00</atom:updated><title>Unintended Consequences (again)</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/medicaids-cost-conundrum/2011/08/28/gIQAdYOAlJ_blog.html?tid=sm_twitter_washingtonpost"&gt;Ezra Klein has an insightful piece&lt;/a&gt; about state Medicare cost containment . Just because we think bidding contracts saves money does not make it so. &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-4968736913077924502?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/5q1RN9xMoGk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/5q1RN9xMoGk/unintended-consequences-again.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/unintended-consequences-again.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-3858180139440333029</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-29T07:07:56.245-04:00</atom:updated><title>A Formula for Growth</title><description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903480904576510660976229354.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop"&gt;A sensible article&lt;/a&gt; on how to (partially) grow our way out of the fiscal mess in the U.S. Will take an about face in direction but he makes a plausible case. Good reading.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-3858180139440333029?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/w7rUAYNGMIY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/w7rUAYNGMIY/formula-for-growth.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/formula-for-growth.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-1441943525451076498</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-28T09:14:05.998-04:00</atom:updated><title>The Rescue that Missed Main Street</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/28/business/economy/the-feds-rescue-missed-main-street.html"&gt;Gretchen Morgenson has a very good article in NYT t&lt;/a&gt;oday on the some of the slimy details of the 2008 crisis-era bailouts. The title aptly describes what follows per the new disclosures made public just last week. Late in the article she quotes Professor Edward Kane who says "bailing out firms indiscriminately hampered rather than promoted the economic recovery". That about sums it up.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-1441943525451076498?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/BKaJnrofoNk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/BKaJnrofoNk/rescue-that-missed-main-street.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/rescue-that-missed-main-street.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-4880321795149957988</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-27T07:46:30.035-04:00</atom:updated><title>The Broken Window Fallacy</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/artcarden/2011/08/25/the-earthquake-wasnt-good-for-the-economy-hurricane-irene-wont-be-either/"&gt;Professor Art Carden has a great article&lt;/a&gt; simply explaining the Broken Window Fallacy . We will likely hear many who adhere to this fallacy spout their inaccurate conclusions in the days ahead as we enter the post Hurricane Irene period.  19th century philosopher/economics writer Frederic Bastiat wrote of this and the unintended consequences that follow this line of thinking. &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-4880321795149957988?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/9el1duwKPZw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/9el1duwKPZw/broken-window-fallacy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/broken-window-fallacy.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-2037476012829581830</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-26T09:00:05.848-04:00</atom:updated><title>The Power of Perspective</title><description>The next issue of our, &lt;a href="http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs060/1102923280857/archive/1103413578995.html"&gt;bi -weekly newsletter&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs060/1102923280857/archive/1103413578995.html"&gt;STAT&lt;/a&gt; is available. You can access it &lt;a href="http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs060/1102923280857/archive/1107291622355.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; If you'd like to receive our email newsletter, you can click the "Sign up for our Email Newsletter" link on the right of this page.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-2037476012829581830?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/BM-oPaoGv_Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/BM-oPaoGv_Y/power-of-perspective.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/power-of-perspective.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-6938303084282826345</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-25T07:18:20.402-04:00</atom:updated><title>Higher Inflation the Answer?</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2011/08/25/more_inflation_isnt_the_answer_99214.html"&gt;A good straightforward article&lt;/a&gt;on why inflation won't cure our present problems. As he states, lack of confidence and uncertainty about government policies are the primary culprit.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-6938303084282826345?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/EcY77BAm76s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/EcY77BAm76s/higher-inflation-answer.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/higher-inflation-answer.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7246400966593817537.post-384862280587196336</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-24T16:07:54.367-04:00</atom:updated><title>Big Banks Undercapitalized?</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/08/big-banks-under-capitalized-overexposed-opaque/"&gt;So says seasoned observer Barry Ritholtz in this piece&lt;/a&gt;. He may well be right. The point he makes toward the end is particularly good. Banks may skate by for now but are they strong enough for the next downturn? &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7246400966593817537-384862280587196336?l=jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~4/kr6dsuYwd-A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/JamesWilsonsBlog/~3/kr6dsuYwd-A/big-banks-undercapitalized.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (James Wilson)</author><feedburner:origLink>http://jewilsonadvisors.blogspot.com/2011/08/big-banks-undercapitalized.html</feedburner:origLink></item><language>en-us</language><media:rating>nonadult</media:rating></channel></rss>

