<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Internet Tech Boston</title>
	
	<link>http://www.internettechboston.com</link>
	<description>Discussion of Internet Technology and the local internet scene in Boston, MA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:36:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/InternetTechBostonComments" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on EditMe is a Wiki with Teeth by sandrar</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~3/1mLvuMZHtlU/</link>
		<dc:creator>sandrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msmamet.wordpress.com/?p=72#comment-5324</guid>
		<description>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog.  :) Cheers! Sandra. R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post&#8230; nice! I love your blog.  <img src='http://www.internettechboston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers! Sandra. R.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~4/1mLvuMZHtlU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internettechboston.com/2008/07/21/editme-is-a-wiki-with-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-5324</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Web Innovators Group » WebInno22 Video</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~3/DgZS22fRyS0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Innovators Group » WebInno22 Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internettechboston.com/?page_id=24#comment-5034</guid>
		<description>[...] to Matthew Mamet and the rest of the team at PermissionTV for participating in the WebInno community by filming last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Matthew Mamet and the rest of the team at PermissionTV for participating in the WebInno community by filming last [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~4/DgZS22fRyS0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internettechboston.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-5034</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time to Think Sales 2.0 by Noreen Vincent</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~3/uvfpfYHWZdA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Noreen Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internettechboston.com/?p=764#comment-5031</guid>
		<description>Snap out of it! How could we possibly negate the positive impact a  well functioning sales organization has to the bottom line.  This just seems ridiculous to me.  As a marketing professional with many years in high tech under my belt, I know from experience that we need tactics that include inbound marketing to help drive inquiries, but the well designed Sales organization has a purpose to drive revenue into the organization. And, great sales people hold "authority" within their profession because they understand and are disciplined in this process as I am in marketing. True sales professionals hold "authority" with their client because they understand how to be a great quarterback for their client throughout the sales lifecycle.  I agree with Trish, you can't take a one size fits all approach, but there are some basic best practices in building a successful sales model that have been established and that can be followed for optimum success.)I'll let you talk to Trish about that).  I believe your clients will appreciate your organization building a top notch sales team and your marketing team will be pleased as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snap out of it! How could we possibly negate the positive impact a  well functioning sales organization has to the bottom line.  This just seems ridiculous to me.  As a marketing professional with many years in high tech under my belt, I know from experience that we need tactics that include inbound marketing to help drive inquiries, but the well designed Sales organization has a purpose to drive revenue into the organization. And, great sales people hold &#8220;authority&#8221; within their profession because they understand and are disciplined in this process as I am in marketing. True sales professionals hold &#8220;authority&#8221; with their client because they understand how to be a great quarterback for their client throughout the sales lifecycle.  I agree with Trish, you can&#8217;t take a one size fits all approach, but there are some basic best practices in building a successful sales model that have been established and that can be followed for optimum success.)I&#8217;ll let you talk to Trish about that).  I believe your clients will appreciate your organization building a top notch sales team and your marketing team will be pleased as well.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~4/uvfpfYHWZdA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internettechboston.com/2009/08/05/time-to-think-sales-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-5031</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time to Think Sales 2.0 by steve dodd</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~3/Xah5w6t7mNI/</link>
		<dc:creator>steve dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internettechboston.com/?p=764#comment-5019</guid>
		<description>Thanks for defending us all Trish!  This article is so far off base.  What is being talked about has been changing slowly over the past 15 years.  Like any "profession" there are the good and the bad.  But good selling has never been about "hoodwinking" prospects.  Those who do, eventually wind up losing big time.  Sales has always been about helping buyers get what they need and want.  Yes, the game is changing (has changed) in that buyers have more information at their disposal than they've had in the past but that still doesn't mean they know what to do with it, how to evaluate it or even buy it if they want to.  

Selling is far more complicated than that and the real pros know and respect this.  They also know how to help a buyer make the decision that is most appropriate for them.  If it happens to be the product that person is offering, great!  If not, that's OK too because a good sales person will run as fast as they can from a bad fit.  Their job is to find the right fit, the right time and the process to make it happen.  In order to do that, they are likely working on 3-4 times their overall sales reponsibility to narrow opportunities down to those that are best suited to the products / services they are representing.  Furthermore, the sales / buying process is a team effort that is comprised of experts from both the buyer and the vendor.  A good sales person is the "quarterback" in that effort.

For those of you who actually believe products "sell themselves", good luck.  The ditch is full of excellent products and technologies that never found their markets, were discarded because real business value was never uncovered, or generally poor business execution.

But, I'm so tired of hearing everybody blame the sales person.  If you want to know where all of those pressure tactics, psycological manouvers and games came from, look to your business leaders who force companies to do whatever is necessary at any cost to make the numbers.  Even with this, a good sales person will still figure out how to it the right way for them, their company and most importantly their customers.  And, just for the record, there are many Sales / Web 2.0 vendors out there using these same old tactics online, without "Sales People".  

Sales 2.0 is nothing new in process and methodolgy.  It's only a new set of tools that when used correctly leverages new capabilities to deliver value.   The fundamentals have not changed. Why, because human nature has not, nor ever will change.  And, people, not processes or corporations, are still the ultimate decision factor.
.-= steve dodd´s last blog ..&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/steve_dodd/statuses/3148841417" rel="nofollow"&gt;steve_dodd: RT @martastrickland: Teens dont tweet!! Stats confirm wht many alrdy thought... more ppl ovr 55 tweet than UNDER 25 http://bit.ly/9qvnS&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for defending us all Trish!  This article is so far off base.  What is being talked about has been changing slowly over the past 15 years.  Like any &#8220;profession&#8221; there are the good and the bad.  But good selling has never been about &#8220;hoodwinking&#8221; prospects.  Those who do, eventually wind up losing big time.  Sales has always been about helping buyers get what they need and want.  Yes, the game is changing (has changed) in that buyers have more information at their disposal than they&#8217;ve had in the past but that still doesn&#8217;t mean they know what to do with it, how to evaluate it or even buy it if they want to.  </p>
<p>Selling is far more complicated than that and the real pros know and respect this.  They also know how to help a buyer make the decision that is most appropriate for them.  If it happens to be the product that person is offering, great!  If not, that&#8217;s OK too because a good sales person will run as fast as they can from a bad fit.  Their job is to find the right fit, the right time and the process to make it happen.  In order to do that, they are likely working on 3-4 times their overall sales reponsibility to narrow opportunities down to those that are best suited to the products / services they are representing.  Furthermore, the sales / buying process is a team effort that is comprised of experts from both the buyer and the vendor.  A good sales person is the &#8220;quarterback&#8221; in that effort.</p>
<p>For those of you who actually believe products &#8220;sell themselves&#8221;, good luck.  The ditch is full of excellent products and technologies that never found their markets, were discarded because real business value was never uncovered, or generally poor business execution.</p>
<p>But, I&#8217;m so tired of hearing everybody blame the sales person.  If you want to know where all of those pressure tactics, psycological manouvers and games came from, look to your business leaders who force companies to do whatever is necessary at any cost to make the numbers.  Even with this, a good sales person will still figure out how to it the right way for them, their company and most importantly their customers.  And, just for the record, there are many Sales / Web 2.0 vendors out there using these same old tactics online, without &#8220;Sales People&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Sales 2.0 is nothing new in process and methodolgy.  It&#8217;s only a new set of tools that when used correctly leverages new capabilities to deliver value.   The fundamentals have not changed. Why, because human nature has not, nor ever will change.  And, people, not processes or corporations, are still the ultimate decision factor.<br />
<span class="cluv"> steve dodd&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://twitter.com/steve_dodd/statuses/3148841417" rel="nofollow">steve_dodd: RT @martastrickland: Teens dont tweet!! Stats confirm wht many alrdy thought&#8230; more ppl ovr 55 tweet than UNDER 25 </a><a href="http://bit.ly/9qvnS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9qvnS</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.internettechboston.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~4/Xah5w6t7mNI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internettechboston.com/2009/08/05/time-to-think-sales-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-5019</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time to Think Sales 2.0 by trish bertuzzi</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~3/XqK4eyjHeBU/</link>
		<dc:creator>trish bertuzzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internettechboston.com/?p=764#comment-5018</guid>
		<description>Wow....talk about throwing a noble profession under the bus!  I can assure you that there are many sales organizations out there that are comprised of people who care and are willing and able to execute a consultative process that provides value.

Don't get sucked into the Sales 2.0 hype OR inbound marketing mania.  Not all buyers are out there looking for a solution.  If that were the case we wouldn't need sales at all.  What about innovators and early adopters - what about situations where your competitors have set the agenda and the buyer doesn't even know you exist - what about good old fashioned taking latent pain to recognized pain?  Not all markets or solutions are created equally so to assume a one size sales model fits all is a recipe for disaster.

There is a middle ground that we are all racing over to get from Sales 1.0 to 2.0.  It combines knowledge of the market with intelligent approaches to inbound and outbound selling.  Before you throw the baby out with the bathwater look at what you can fix now...read our "Have You Mastered Sales 1.5?" article to see what I am talking about http://blog.bridgegroupinc.com/blog/tabid/47760/bid/9747/Have-You-Mastered-Sales-1-5.aspx.

Thanks for listening - now I have to go sell something.
.-= trish bertuzzi´s last blog ..&lt;a href="http://blog.bridgegroupinc.com/blog/tabid/47760/bid/10106/The-Flaw-In-Calculating-Inbound-v-Outbound-Marketing.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Flaw In Calculating Inbound v. Outbound Marketing&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;.talk about throwing a noble profession under the bus!  I can assure you that there are many sales organizations out there that are comprised of people who care and are willing and able to execute a consultative process that provides value.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get sucked into the Sales 2.0 hype OR inbound marketing mania.  Not all buyers are out there looking for a solution.  If that were the case we wouldn&#8217;t need sales at all.  What about innovators and early adopters &#8211; what about situations where your competitors have set the agenda and the buyer doesn&#8217;t even know you exist &#8211; what about good old fashioned taking latent pain to recognized pain?  Not all markets or solutions are created equally so to assume a one size sales model fits all is a recipe for disaster.</p>
<p>There is a middle ground that we are all racing over to get from Sales 1.0 to 2.0.  It combines knowledge of the market with intelligent approaches to inbound and outbound selling.  Before you throw the baby out with the bathwater look at what you can fix now&#8230;read our &#8220;Have You Mastered Sales 1.5?&#8221; article to see what I am talking about <a href="http://blog.bridgegroupinc.com/blog/tabid/47760/bid/9747/Have-You-Mastered-Sales-1-5.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blog.bridgegroupinc.com/blog/tabid/47760/bid/9747/Have-You-Mastered-Sales-1-5.aspx</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for listening &#8211; now I have to go sell something.<br />
<span class="cluv"> trish bertuzzi&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://blog.bridgegroupinc.com/blog/tabid/47760/bid/10106/The-Flaw-In-Calculating-Inbound-v-Outbound-Marketing.aspx" rel="nofollow">The Flaw In Calculating Inbound v. Outbound Marketing</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.internettechboston.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~4/XqK4eyjHeBU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internettechboston.com/2009/08/05/time-to-think-sales-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-5018</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time to Think Sales 2.0 by Nigel Edelshain</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~3/umC9_EMMdUM/</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Edelshain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internettechboston.com/?p=764#comment-5017</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out the Sales 2.0 trend. The changeover to Sales 2.0 is really picking up steam now.

Interesting that you chose Darmesh from Hubspot as your example. Hubspot has been championing the Inbound Marketing movement for a while and we've been championing the Sales 2.0 movement. We now all realize that sales and marketing departments are coming together in a "Sales 2.0 world". So I believe you will see a lot of commonality between the Inbound Marketing and Sales 2.0 movements going forward - maybe even a joint conference one day.

Times are certainly a-changin' in sales (good thing too "Sales 1.0" was invented in the 1890's - by John Patterson of NCR).

Nigel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out the Sales 2.0 trend. The changeover to Sales 2.0 is really picking up steam now.</p>
<p>Interesting that you chose Darmesh from Hubspot as your example. Hubspot has been championing the Inbound Marketing movement for a while and we&#8217;ve been championing the Sales 2.0 movement. We now all realize that sales and marketing departments are coming together in a &#8220;Sales 2.0 world&#8221;. So I believe you will see a lot of commonality between the Inbound Marketing and Sales 2.0 movements going forward &#8211; maybe even a joint conference one day.</p>
<p>Times are certainly a-changin&#8217; in sales (good thing too &#8220;Sales 1.0&#8243; was invented in the 1890&#8217;s &#8211; by John Patterson of NCR).</p>
<p>Nigel</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~4/umC9_EMMdUM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internettechboston.com/2009/08/05/time-to-think-sales-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-5017</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There are no more websites – just content by Steve Walker</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~3/nhC87ZdEUys/</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internettechboston.com/?p=711#comment-5003</guid>
		<description>Great idea if you want to get over the idea of being cheeky, creative and fun (i.e. extremely niche).  But if I'm visiting a website for information, I want to get it quickly, and video limits the speed at which I can get what I want.  So I find video, by and large, annoying and I avoid it if possible.  Like Ari, I want words and reading, so I can absorb the bits I want, at the speed I want.

Are we setting up a paradox, here?  Social Media are killing people's attention span, and there are several examples of places using social media such as video to get a message across.  But in my social media ADHD way, I can't be bothered to wait for the video, so the the message doesn't get across to me.  So are social media ultimately self-defeating?
.-= Steve Walker´s last blog ..&lt;a href="http://emeapressoffice.oracle.com/content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=3267&amp;NewsAreaID=2" rel="nofollow"&gt;Oracle® Enterprise Performance Management and Business Intelligence Selected by Customers Seeking Greater Business Insight and Performance&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea if you want to get over the idea of being cheeky, creative and fun (i.e. extremely niche).  But if I&#8217;m visiting a website for information, I want to get it quickly, and video limits the speed at which I can get what I want.  So I find video, by and large, annoying and I avoid it if possible.  Like Ari, I want words and reading, so I can absorb the bits I want, at the speed I want.</p>
<p>Are we setting up a paradox, here?  Social Media are killing people&#8217;s attention span, and there are several examples of places using social media such as video to get a message across.  But in my social media ADHD way, I can&#8217;t be bothered to wait for the video, so the the message doesn&#8217;t get across to me.  So are social media ultimately self-defeating?<br />
<span class="cluv"> Steve Walker&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://emeapressoffice.oracle.com/content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=3267&amp;NewsAreaID=2" rel="nofollow">Oracle® Enterprise Performance Management and Business Intelligence Selected by Customers Seeking Greater Business Insight and Performance</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.internettechboston.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~4/nhC87ZdEUys" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internettechboston.com/2009/07/20/there-are-no-more-websites-just-content/comment-page-1/#comment-5003</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There are no more websites – just content by There are no more websites – just content: Internet Tech Boston « In Front Of Your Nose: An online PR blog</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~3/QITOhpe14Vw/</link>
		<dc:creator>There are no more websites – just content: Internet Tech Boston « In Front Of Your Nose: An online PR blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internettechboston.com/?p=711#comment-5002</guid>
		<description>[...] There are no more websites – just content: Internet Tech Boston   via internettechboston.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are no more websites – just content: Internet Tech&nbsp;Boston   via internettechboston.com [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~4/QITOhpe14Vw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internettechboston.com/2009/07/20/there-are-no-more-websites-just-content/comment-page-1/#comment-5002</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There are no more websites – just content by Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~3/1vyXZx-Ck8g/</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internettechboston.com/?p=711#comment-4929</guid>
		<description>It's kitsch but the buck stops there. I couldn't even watch the entire video; but then again, a Youtube-driven website doesn't appeal to the writer in me. I like words. I like reading.
.-= Ari Herzog´s last blog ..&lt;a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ariwriter/~3/p2TydBRTiSw/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Is Twitter Stupid?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kitsch but the buck stops there. I couldn&#8217;t even watch the entire video; but then again, a Youtube-driven website doesn&#8217;t appeal to the writer in me. I like words. I like reading.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Ari Herzog&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ariwriter/~3/p2TydBRTiSw/" rel="nofollow">Is Twitter Stupid?</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.internettechboston.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~4/1vyXZx-Ck8g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internettechboston.com/2009/07/20/there-are-no-more-websites-just-content/comment-page-1/#comment-4929</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boston-area Startup Marketing Meetup – Recap by Boston-Area Startup Marketing Meetup #2- Videos » blogstring.com</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~3/xJSZym6chA8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Boston-Area Startup Marketing Meetup #2- Videos » blogstring.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internettechboston.com/?p=739#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>[...] Matthew Mamet from PermissionTV gave a presentation on Using Video in Online Marketing (slides | blog post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matthew Mamet from PermissionTV gave a presentation on Using Video in Online Marketing (slides | blog post). [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InternetTechBostonComments/~4/xJSZym6chA8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.internettechboston.com/2009/07/23/boston-area-startup-marketing-meetup-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-4928</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
