<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Impeach Them All!</title>
		<link>http://impeach-them-all.org/</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<dc:creator>"Liberty Rant"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:58:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:26:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
			<item>
  <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 18:52:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>Is He or Isn't He (A Marxist)?</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/IsHeorIsntHeAMarxist.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/IsHeorIsntHeAMarxist.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>Is Obama a Marxist? For many, the answer is clear. I believe that Obama <i>is</i> a Marxist, but there are many doubters and deniers of Obama's Marxist ideological roots, and for that reason I will address the question as if it were still open. As I see it,  individuals fall into four categories on the issue of Obama the Marxist:</p>


...</b><b>]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:02:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>I've Had It with the Doom Talk</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/IveHadItwiththeDoomTalk.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/IveHadItwiththeDoomTalk.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>Today was a bad day for those who want to preserve our constitutional republic. While Obama is acting more and more like a mad dog, Rick Santorum just dropped out of the race for the Republican nomination, seemingly leaving Mitt Romney the last man standing. In my opinion there is good reason to fear that Romney will be unable to get enough votes to beat Obama in November, but even if he does, there are worries that he will compromise too much with the far-left agenda. Where does that leave us? Doomed? I say, "Hell, no!"</p>

...]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>Any Light at the End of the Tunnel?</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/AnyLightattheEndoftheTun.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/AnyLightattheEndoftheTun.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>At the end of November I uploaded a blogpost entitiled <i>"America, an Obituary."</i> The goal was to get my internal negativity about the prospects for the American Republic out into cyberspace, perhaps exorcising it like a demon, knowing that there were many out there who felt similarly. It didn't work. My pessimism stuck to me like napalm. Next, we got Willard "Mitt" Romney as the Republican Anointed One. I then decided to look again at the big picture. I asked myself, is there any light at the end of a big, dark tunnel? I decided that yes, there is. Faint glimmerings of light, far, far away, but light nevertheless. Here's the light, in my opinion:...</p>]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:32:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>Electing a Commander-in-Chief</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/ElectingaCommander-in-Ch.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/ElectingaCommander-in-Ch.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>With all the fooferaw and folderol about which Republican poses more of a threat to capitalism, Romney or Gingrich, the press and talk show pundits are missing a very big point: who will be the next Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces? Why do I ask this question? I ask it because <b>we are already in a covert war with Iran</b>, and within the first term of our next POTUS, in my opinion, the chances of that war breaking out into the open are quite high.</p>

...]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:24:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>America: An Obituary</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/AmericaAnObituary.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/AmericaAnObituary.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>This blogpost was inspired by Mark Steyn's grim recap of our current situation this morning as substitute host on Rush Limbaugh's show. A second inspiration was Ayn Rand's landmark 1960 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_piJYYYTKc&feature=youtube_gdata_player"  title="Conservatism, An Obituary (Video)"  >essay</a>, <b><i>"Conservatism, an Obituary."</i></b> No, conservatism is not dead, and neither is America. <i>Yet</i>. Sometimes, however, I need to get all my pessimism about America's future out in one big blogpost, and this is it.</p>

...]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:47:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>Good Imperialism, Part 2.</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/GoodImperialismPart2.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/GoodImperialismPart2.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>In general, religions try to spread their ideas by persuasion of adults and indoctrination of youth and children, but sometimes they resort to force. The common element of all religions, in my opinion, is <i>faith</i>, that is, belief based on the believer's desire to believe, irrespective of any facts which might persuade him otherwise. Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, and other religions all attempt to propagate faith and conversion to their beliefs, but the only religion which <i>has always systematically advocated force</i> to spread its faith to the entire population of the earth, is Islam, the Arab religion of Muhammad. Historically, however, some other religions have taken similar action, sometimes most brutally, but temporarily.</p>

...]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>Good Imperialism</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/GoodImperialism.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/GoodImperialism.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>Is there such a thing as "good" imperialism? For some, that sounds like an oxymoron: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=define:imperialism&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8"  title="Imperialism: Various Definitions"  >Imperialism</a> has a very bad reputation. What I want to write about here is how it got such a bad reputation, how its attackers tend to be extreme hypocrites, and finally, about how "imperialism" itself is a concept that creates more confusion than clarity: there are better ways to write about and speak about empires and their consequences. Do I personally approve of "imperialism"? I'm saving that for the last paragraph of Part 2 (or maybe even Part 3), to be posted later. Meanwhile, I'll confess that I used the title "Good Imperialism" for this blogpost especially to tweak the self-described "progressive left."</p>

...]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 07:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>Don't Call Me Right-Wing</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/DontCallMeRight-Wing.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/DontCallMeRight-Wing.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>The self-described "Left" used to call their enemies "reactionaries," "counter-revolutionaries," "class enemies," or "fascists." They still throw around such names once in a while, but currently, they prefer such epithets as "extremists" and "racists" for those whom they seek to destroy. However, they have reserved one adjective above all to smear those they hate: "right-wing." It is my goal in this blogpost to demolish the destructive power of that term once and for all.</p>

...]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:03:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>The Alinsky Apocalypse</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/TheAlinskyApocalypse.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/TheAlinskyApocalypse.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p><b><i>&#x201c;Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity.&#x201d; </i></b>Thus wrote William Butler Yeats in 1919 in the aftermath of World War One. Yet to come, when Yeats penned the words, were the Weimar Republic, the Holocaust, mass murder throughout the Communist world, and the thermonuclear destruction of Hiroshima. Are Yeats' verses less valid today in 2011? In my opinion, they are more valid than ever, in part thanks to the work of one man, Saul Alinsky, and his followers. But first, a brief review of the Apocalypse, what it means, and why it might be coming.</p>

...]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:59:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>Can Our Schools be Saved?</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/CanOurSchoolsbeSaved.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/CanOurSchoolsbeSaved.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>Lenin famously said that the capitalists would sell the Bolsheviks the rope with which to hang them. Even Lenin underestimated the folly of the &#x201c;pragmatists&#x201d; in the world of business and the anti-intellectualism of American society. The beneficiaries of capitalism are not merely <i>selling</i> the means of destruction of the only political system which recognizes individual rights. They are <i>buying</i> the rope with which to hang capitalism, and not at bargain prices, either. That rope is called &#x201c;College.&#x201d;</p>

...]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:33:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>The Obscenity of Higher Taxes
</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/TheObscenityofHigherTaxe.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/TheObscenityofHigherTaxe.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>"Read My Lips." Thus began the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Read_my_lips:_no_new_taxes"  title="Read My Lips (Wikipedia)"  >promise</a> that George Herbert Walker Bush, 41st President of the USA made to the electorate in 1988 when he promised that he opposed any new taxes. Essentially, he lied, and because of his lie, Bush 41, who was popular because of the Gulf War victory in Iraq, was not re-elected, ushering in the 8-year Clinton era. Will the Republican Party, still dominated by "moderates" like John Boehner and Lindsey Graham, make the same mistake again? Will they reach across the aisle to the Obamacrats and cave in to pressure to raise taxes? What follows are some serious reasons why they should not repeat Bush 41's grave mistake, no matter how intense the pressure from financial and "moderate" pundits.</p>

...</b><b>]]></description>
</item><item>
  <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 09:32:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <title>America's Dark Night of the Soul</title>
  <link>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/AmericasDarkNightoftheSo.html</link>
  <guid>http://impeach-them-all.org/Archive/AmericasDarkNightoftheSo.html</guid>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>Recently, after waking from a night of fitful sleep, or sometimes from a frank nightmare, as I become aware of my surroundings I slowly begin to remember that I am awakening to a nightmare usually worse that the one I was in while sleeping. Although I am generally an upbeat, optimistic person, from time to time I allow the full horror of America's current state of political economy to wash over me like a giant wave. This is one of those times. I am writing this, not to discourage or demoralize my readers, but to share with them the <i>sheer horror</i> of where we stand at this time in American history, a horror that they have undoubtedly also experienced. I have chosen five topics to exemplify that horror: 1. The insanity of the Tax the Rich theme, so recently repeated in the preachy voice of Barack Hussein Obama. 2. The vapidity and ineptness (or is it deliberate betrayal?) of the ruling Republican establishment. 3. The intellectual corruption of the American educational system, from preschool to grad school, which calls into question whether such corruption can ever be reversed. 4. The stability of the proportion of Americans who approve "somewhat" of Barack Hussein Obama, as reflected in various polls, and finally: 5. The banality of evil as represented by the character and utterances of Barack Hussein Obama himself, the community organizer who is hell-bent on destroying America, either deliberately, through ineptness, or both.&#xa0;</p>

...</b><b>]]></description>
</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

