<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Georgetown Security Law Brief</title>
    
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-1669064</id>
    <updated>2012-05-24T15:00:00-04:00</updated>
    <subtitle />
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/GeorgetownSecurityBrief" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="georgetownsecuritybrief" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://hubbub.api.typepad.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">GeorgetownSecurityBrief</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry>
        <title>In case you missed it ...</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/in-case-you-missed-it-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/in-case-you-missed-it-.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305cc9c82970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T15:00:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T16:56:20-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: Important stories from this week: Supreme Court to rule on standing to challenge wiretapping law The US Supreme Court granted certiorari Monday in Clapper v. Amnesty International USA to determine whether the plaintiffs have standing to challenge a federal eavesdropping law. Pakistan jails doctor who helped CIA find Bin Laden A Pakistani doctor who helped the CIA find Osama Bin Laden has been jailed for at least 30 years. Shakil Afridi was charged with treason for running a fake vaccination program to gather information. White House: sanctions will move forward despite progress in talks with Iran The White House...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jc&gt;Constitutional Law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!m&gt;Secrecy / Transparency / FOIA" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!p&gt;Surveillance / Privacy" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!q&gt;Afghanistan / Pakistan" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Analysis" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Iran" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Nuclear Weapons " />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: Important stories from this week:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/supreme-court-to-rule-on-standing-to-challenge-wiretapping-law.html" target="_self">Supreme  Court to rule on standing to challenge wiretapping law</a></p>
<p>The US Supreme Court granted certiorari Monday in Clapper v. Amnesty  International USA to determine whether the plaintiffs have standing to  challenge a federal eavesdropping law.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/pakistan-jails-doctor-who-helped-cia-find-bin-laden.html" target="_self">Pakistan  jails doctor who helped CIA find Bin Laden</a></p>
<p>A Pakistani doctor  who helped the CIA find Osama Bin Laden has been jailed for at least 30  years.  Shakil Afridi was charged with treason for running a fake  vaccination program to gather information.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/white-house-sanctions-will-move-forward-despite-progress-in-talks-with-iran.html" target="_self">White House: sanctions will move forward despite progress in talks with Iran</a></p>
<p>The White House says it will not immediately lift sanctions on Iran as a result of progress in talks to allow an investigation into Tehran’s nuclear program.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/senate-panel-votes-to-extend-governments-broader-surveillance-authority.html" target="_self">Senate panel votes to extend Government's broader surveillance authority</a></p>
<p>The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence voted Tuesday to extend a contested 2008 provision of foreign intelligence surveillance law that is set to expire at year’s end.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/2nd-circuit-shields-cia-interrogation-documents.html" target="_self">2nd Circuit shields CIA interrogation documents</a></p>
<p>A federal appeals court has ruled the CIA does not have to disclose records of interrogation techniques used against terrorism suspects in 2002.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/Vujaiqlk468" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Mladic trial to resume June 25</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/mladic-trial-to-resume-june-25.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/mladic-trial-to-resume-june-25.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766c093ae970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T13:24:52-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T13:24:52-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: The Huffington Post reports the war crimes trial of former Bosnian Serb General Ratko Mladic will resume on June 25th, about a month later than initially planned. The trial was put on hold shortly after it began this month after prosecutors had failed to disclose all case documents. The UN Yugoslav tribunal agreed, saying the disclosure failures by prosecutors were significant enough to warrant a delay. But on Thursday the court rejected the defense’s request for a six-month halt, saying a shorter postponement of the original May 29 date was more reasonable.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jb&gt;International Law / Law of War / Human Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!u&gt;Europe / Eurasia" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/24/ratko-mladic-trial-serbia-general-war-crimes_n_1542899.html" target="_self">Huffington Post</a> reports the war crimes trial of former Bosnian Serb General Ratko Mladic will resume on June 25th, about a month later than initially planned.  The trial was put on hold shortly after it began this month after prosecutors had failed to disclose all case documents.  The UN Yugoslav tribunal agreed, saying the disclosure failures by prosecutors were significant enough to warrant a delay. But on Thursday the court rejected the defense’s request for a six-month halt, saying a shorter postponement of the original May 29 date was more reasonable.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/n5bAs7LMbpk" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Iranian sailors assist US ship under attack by pirates</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/iranian-sailors-assist-us-ship-under-attack-by-pirates.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/iranian-sailors-assist-us-ship-under-attack-by-pirates.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebc1f25d970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T13:18:15-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T13:18:15-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: CNN reports Iranian sailors helped scare off armed pirates who attacked an American cargo ship in the Gulf of Oman. According to Iranian state media, the incident occurred northeast of Fujairah, a port for refueling oil tankers. The port, in the United Arab Emirates, is close to the Strait of Hormuz, an important oil shipping lane. It's the latest example of US-Iranian cooperation on pirate-infested high seas despite a wave of tensions between Washington and Tehran over the decades. The United States, Iran and other nations have been intent on repelling pirates operating in the Gulf of Aden and...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jb&gt;International Law / Law of War / Human Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!w&gt;Middle East / Northern Africa" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Iran" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Maritime Security" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/24/world/meast/iran-pirates/index.html" target="_self">CNN</a> reports Iranian sailors helped scare off armed pirates who attacked an American cargo ship in the Gulf of Oman.  According to Iranian state media, the incident occurred northeast of Fujairah, a port for refueling oil tankers.  The port, in the United Arab Emirates, is close to the Strait of Hormuz, an important oil shipping lane.  It's the latest example of US-Iranian cooperation on pirate-infested high seas despite a wave of tensions between Washington and Tehran over the decades.  The United States, Iran and other nations have been intent on repelling pirates operating in the Gulf of Aden and other bodies of water.  American forces assisted or rescued Iranians at sea several times in January.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/cq4QHrwqHGQ" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>4th Circuit rules on legal definition of piracy</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/4th-circuit-rules-on-legal-definition-of-piracy.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/4th-circuit-rules-on-legal-definition-of-piracy.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766c07e98970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T13:12:09-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T13:12:09-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: JURIST reports the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled Wednesday that the legal definition of maritime piracy includes an armed attack to hijack a ship, even if the attempt is unsuccessful. In one case, the court upheld the convictions of five Somali pirates who attacked the USS Nicholas in April 2010, rejecting their contention that the definition of piracy as defined by the law of nations under 18 US Code, section 1651 does not include violence or aggression committed on the high seas. In a second case, the court reversed a lower court’s dismissal of charges...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!f&gt;Law Enforcement / Criminal Law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jb&gt;International Law / Law of War / Human Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!w&gt;Middle East / Northern Africa" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Maritime Security" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: <a href="http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/05/federal-appeals-court-rules-on-legal-definition-of-piracy.php" target="_self">JURIST</a> reports the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled Wednesday that the legal definition of maritime piracy includes an armed attack to hijack a ship, even if the attempt is unsuccessful.  In one case, the court upheld the convictions of five Somali pirates who attacked the USS Nicholas in April 2010, rejecting their contention that the definition of piracy as defined by the law of nations under 18 US Code, section 1651 does not include violence or aggression committed on the high seas.  In a second case, the court reversed a lower court’s dismissal of charges against five Somali men accused of involvement in the April attack on the USS Ashland in the Gulf of Aden.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/qXdiWnnvxK0" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>No charges for woman who caused jet "implant" scare</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/no-charges-for-woman-who-caused-jet-implant-scare.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/no-charges-for-woman-who-caused-jet-implant-scare.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305caba39970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T08:35:39-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T08:35:39-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: BBC News reports a French woman who caused a security incident on a plane on Tuesday by claiming to have a surgically-implanted device will be released without charge. North Carolina-bound US Airways flight 787 was diverted to Bangor, Maine, after Lucie Zeeko Marigot, 41, alerted attendants to the alleged device. The Cameroonian-born woman will be turned over to the US border agency before being returned to France, federal prosecutor Thomas Delahanty said. The flight was traveling from Paris to Charlotte, North Carolina when Marigot passed a note in French to flight attendants saying she had an object in her...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!f&gt;Law Enforcement / Criminal Law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!g&gt;Homeland Security / Immigration" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18185013" target="_self">BBC News</a> reports a French woman who caused a security incident on a plane on Tuesday by claiming to have a surgically-implanted device will be released without charge.  North Carolina-bound US Airways flight 787 was diverted to Bangor, Maine, after Lucie Zeeko Marigot, 41, alerted attendants to the alleged device.  The Cameroonian-born woman will be turned over to the US border agency before being returned to France, federal prosecutor Thomas Delahanty said.  The flight was traveling from Paris to Charlotte, North Carolina when Marigot passed a note in French to flight attendants saying she had an object in her that "was out of control", along with a book in French telling her personal story, officials said.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/YbRydA3oqQQ" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>9/11 accused want Obama, Bush testimony at Guantanamo</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/911-accused-want-obama-bush-testimony-at-guantanamo.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/911-accused-want-obama-bush-testimony-at-guantanamo.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766beb68a970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T08:29:44-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T08:29:44-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: The Miami Herald reports defense attorneys seeking to derail the trial of five men accused of orchestrating the September 11 attacks are asking a military judge to order President Barack Obama and former president George W. Bush, Vice President Joe Biden, US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), and Attorney General Eric Holder to testify at the Guantanamo military commission. At issue in the motion unsealed Wednesday evening at the Pentagon is whether alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his alleged co-conspirators can get a fair capital murder terror trial from a military jury of twelve or more US officers....</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!l&gt;Detainees / Guantanamo" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: The <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/23/2814548/911-accused-want-obama-bush-testimony.html" target="_self">Miami Herald</a> reports defense attorneys seeking to derail the trial of five men accused of orchestrating the September 11 attacks are asking a military judge to order President Barack Obama and former president George W. Bush, Vice President Joe Biden, US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), and Attorney General Eric Holder to testify at the Guantanamo military commission.  At issue in the motion unsealed Wednesday evening at the Pentagon is whether alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his alleged co-conspirators can get a fair capital murder terror trial from a military jury of twelve or more US officers.  “For the past 10 years, these defendants have consistently been described as ‘thugs,’ ‘murderers,’ and ‘terrorists’ who ‘planned the 9/11 attacks’ and must ‘face justice,’ ” the lawyers argued.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/-8ittlk2HNc" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Scholarship: A functional approach to targeting and detention</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/scholarship-a-functional-approach-to-targeting-and-detention.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/scholarship-a-functional-approach-to-targeting-and-detention.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766beb0b5970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T08:25:42-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T08:25:42-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: The Michigan Law Review has this article by Professor Monica Hakimi proposing new principles of international law to govern when states may target to kill or preventatively detain nonstate actors. Contrary to the current method of establishing different standards across ‘regulatory domains,’ Hakimi argues that all targeting and detention law ought to be rooted in a common set of core principles. Decisionmakers should look to those principles to assess when states may target or detain nonstate actors. Doing so would address the practical problems of the domain method. It would narrow the uncertainty about when targeting and detention are...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jb&gt;International Law / Law of War / Human Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!y&gt;Commentary / Opinion" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: The <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2042172" target="_self">Michigan Law Review</a> has this article by Professor Monica Hakimi proposing new principles of international law to govern when states may target to kill or preventatively detain nonstate actors.  Contrary to the current method of establishing different standards across ‘regulatory domains,’ Hakimi argues that all targeting and detention law ought to be rooted in a common set of core principles.  Decisionmakers should look to those principles to assess when states may target or detain nonstate actors.  Doing so would address the practical problems of the domain method. It would narrow the uncertainty about when targeting and detention are lawful, lead to a more coherent legal discourse, and equip decisionmakers to develop the law and hold one another accountable. HT to Robert Chesney.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/VcNjBfz5Vyk" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Rep. King: CIA, Pentagon too close to filmmakers</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/rep-king-cia-pentagon-too-close-to-filmmakers.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/rep-king-cia-pentagon-too-close-to-filmmakers.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305caa072970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T08:19:32-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T08:19:32-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: The Washington Times reports House committee chairman complained Wednesday that the CIA and Defense Department jeopardized national security by cooperating too closely with filmmakers producing a movie on the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. Representative Peter T. King (R-N.Y.), who is Homeland Security Committee chairman, first raised questions about the bin Laden movie last summer but said newly released documents confirm his suspicions. The filmmakers are director Kathryn Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal, who won Academy Awards for the motion picture “The Hurt Locker.” King referred to documents obtained by Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!m&gt;Secrecy / Transparency / FOIA" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/23/rep-king-cia-pentagon-too-close-filmmakers/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS" target="_self">Washington Times</a> reports House committee chairman complained Wednesday that the CIA and Defense Department jeopardized national security by cooperating too closely with filmmakers producing a movie on the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.  Representative Peter T. King (R-N.Y.), who is Homeland Security Committee chairman, first raised questions about the bin Laden movie last summer but said newly released documents confirm his suspicions.  The filmmakers are director Kathryn Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal, who won Academy Awards for the motion picture “The Hurt Locker.”  King referred to documents obtained by Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act request.  He said the filmmakers received “extremely close, unprecedented, and potentially dangerous collaboration” from the Obama Administration.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/lHLjgxJVmjQ" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>District Court demands Guantanamo videos</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/district-court-demands-guantanamo-videos.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/district-court-demands-guantanamo-videos.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766bea273970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T08:15:06-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T08:15:06-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: POLITICO reports a federal judge has ordered the Defense Department to turn over three video recordings showing prisoners at Guantanamo Bay being forced out of their cells for in camera inspection. Judge John Bates of the US District Court for the District of Columbia issued the unusual order Wednesday in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by families of Kuwaiti prisoners being held at the US military-run prison for terror suspects at Guantanamo. Bates said the Pentagon, which is represented in the case by the Justice Department, had failed to offer detailed enough explanations to sustain the Government's...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!l&gt;Detainees / Guantanamo" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!m&gt;Secrecy / Transparency / FOIA" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2012/05/judge-demands-guantanamo-videos-124409.html" target="_self">POLITICO</a> reports a federal judge has ordered the Defense Department to turn over three video recordings showing prisoners at Guantanamo Bay being forced out of their cells for in camera inspection.  Judge John Bates of the US District Court for the District of Columbia issued the unusual order Wednesday in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by families of Kuwaiti prisoners being held at the US military-run prison for terror suspects at Guantanamo.  Bates said the Pentagon, which is represented in the case by the Justice Department, had failed to offer detailed enough explanations to sustain the Government's position that the videos are exempt from disclosure under the law.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/nzvyYWDdGrc" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>US hacks websites of Yemen al-Qaeda affiliate</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/us-hacks-websites-of-yemen-al-qaeda-affiliate.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/us-hacks-websites-of-yemen-al-qaeda-affiliate.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebc00bef970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T08:09:30-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T08:09:30-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: The Washington Post reports State Department computer experts recently hacked into Web sites being used by al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen and substituted the group’s anti-American rhetoric with information about civilians killed in terrorist strikes. When al-Qaeda recruitment propaganda appeared on tribal sites in Yemen, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said, “within 48 hours, our team plastered the same sites with altered versions that showed the toll al-Qaeda attacks have taken on the Yemeni people.” The revelation provided an unusual window into low-level cyberwarfare activities that the government rarely discusses.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!h&gt;Intelligence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!w&gt;Middle East / Northern Africa" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cyberlaw / Cyber Security" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-hacks-web-sites-of-al-qaeda-affiliate-in-yemen/2012/05/23/gJQAGnOxlU_story.html?wprss=rss_world" target="_self">Washington Post</a> reports State Department computer experts recently hacked into Web sites being used by al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen and substituted the group’s anti-American rhetoric with information about civilians killed in terrorist strikes.  When al-Qaeda recruitment propaganda appeared on tribal sites in Yemen, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said, “within 48 hours, our team plastered the same sites with altered versions that showed the toll al-Qaeda attacks have taken on the Yemeni people.”  The revelation provided an unusual window into low-level cyberwarfare activities that the government rarely discusses.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/WPNGdz3sHLY" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Iran rejects West's proposal on nuclear curbs</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/iran-rejects-wests-proposal-on-nucelar-curbs.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/iran-rejects-wests-proposal-on-nucelar-curbs.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebc0033b970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T08:02:40-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T13:27:17-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: The Miami Herald reports Iranian negotiators on Thursday rejected proposals by six world powers to curb Tehran's nuclear program, and demanded answers to their own counteroffer meant to alleviate concerns about Iran's ability to build atomic weapons. Saeed Jalili, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, demanded an overhaul to the plan put forward by the world powers after the Baghdad talks began Wednesday. An Iranian diplomat involved in the discussions said the package falls far short of a compromise. Still, the negotiations did not appear in danger of collapse as envoys convened again in Baghdad.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Iran" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Nuclear Weapons " />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: The <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/23/2814090/iran-nuclear-talks-snag-over-dueling.html" target="_self">Miami Herald</a> reports Iranian negotiators on Thursday rejected proposals by six world powers to curb Tehran's nuclear program, and demanded answers to their own counteroffer meant to alleviate concerns about Iran's ability to build atomic weapons.  Saeed Jalili, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, demanded an overhaul to the plan put forward by the world powers after the Baghdad talks began Wednesday.  An Iranian diplomat involved in the discussions said the package falls far short of a compromise.  Still, the negotiations did not appear in danger of collapse as envoys convened again in Baghdad.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/VRa60woS9W8" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Senator pushes clearer limits on presidential war powers</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/senator-pushes-clearer-limits-on-presidential-war-powers.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/senator-pushes-clearer-limits-on-presidential-war-powers.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebbff857970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T07:55:34-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T07:55:34-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: CNN reports Senator Jim Webb (D-Va.), has introduced legislation requiring explicit congressional approval of future U.S. humanitarian or peacekeeping operations involving the military and likely hostilities. The measure would not apply to instances where there’s an imminent threat to the United States, US allies or American citizens. Under the terms of the bill, co-sponsored by Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), both chambers of Congress would be required to vote within 48 hours of a presidential authorization request. Webb, a former Navy secretary and assistant Defense secretary, was strongly critical of President Barack Obama's decision to intervene militarily in Libya in...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jc&gt;Constitutional Law" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/23/politics/webb-war-powers/index.html?eref=rss_politics&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_allpolitics+%28RSS%3A+Politics%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_self">CNN</a> reports Senator Jim Webb (D-Va.), has introduced legislation requiring explicit congressional approval of future U.S. humanitarian or peacekeeping operations involving the military and likely hostilities.  The measure would not apply to instances where there’s an imminent threat to the United States, US allies or American citizens.  Under the terms of the bill, co-sponsored by Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), both chambers of Congress would be required to vote within 48 hours of a presidential authorization request.  Webb, a former Navy secretary and assistant Defense secretary, was strongly critical of President Barack Obama's decision to intervene militarily in Libya in 2011 without congressional authorization.  He has also expressed concern about the possibility of American intervention in the Syrian crisis.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/6MmmsoIX-v8" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Former secrecy czar asks court to release NSA document</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/former-secrecy-czar-asks-court-to-release-nsa-document.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/former-secrecy-czar-asks-court-to-release-nsa-document.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebbff1c6970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-24T07:50:55-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-24T07:50:55-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/24/12: Secrecy News reports the former director of the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) asked a federal court yesterday for permission to disclose a National Security Agency document that he said represented an egregious example of overclassification. J. William Leonard was the ISOO director, or what is sometimes called the “classification czar,” from 2002 to 2008. In 2010, Leonard became an expert consultant for the defense of Thomas A. Drake, the former NSA official who was charged with ten felony counts alleging unlawful retention of classified information. In Count One of the indictment against Drake, he was charged with unauthorized...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!h&gt;Intelligence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!m&gt;Secrecy / Transparency / FOIA" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/24/12: <a href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/05/drake_leonard.html" target="_self">Secrecy News</a> reports the former director of the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) asked a federal court yesterday for permission to disclose a National Security Agency document that he said represented an egregious example of overclassification.  J. William Leonard was the ISOO director, or what is sometimes called the “classification czar,” from 2002 to 2008.  In 2010, Leonard became an expert consultant for the defense of Thomas A. Drake, the former NSA official who was charged with ten felony counts alleging unlawful retention of classified information.  In Count One of the indictment against Drake, he was charged with unauthorized retention of a classified NSA email message entitled “What A Success,” and it is that document which Leonard is now seeking to make public.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/ijykT4VElGw" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Senate panel votes to extend Government's broader surveillance authority</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/senate-panel-votes-to-extend-governments-broader-surveillance-authority.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/senate-panel-votes-to-extend-governments-broader-surveillance-authority.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebbaa804970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T15:39:16-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T15:39:16-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: The Washington Post reports the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence voted Tuesday to extend a contested 2008 provision of foreign intelligence surveillance law that is set to expire at year’s end. The vote is the first step toward what the Obama administration hopes will be a speedy renewal of an expanded authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to monitor the US e-mails and phone calls of overseas targets in an effort to prevent international terrorist attacks on the country. It is unclear, however, how quickly the full Congress will act to reauthorize the provision in the FISA...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!h&gt;Intelligence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!p&gt;Surveillance / Privacy" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/senate-panel-votes-to-extend-governments-broader-surveillance-authority/2012/05/22/gIQAneHPjU_story.html?wprss=rss_world" target="_self">Washington Post</a> reports the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence voted Tuesday to extend a contested 2008 provision of foreign intelligence surveillance law that is set to expire at year’s end.  The vote is the first step toward what the Obama administration hopes will be a speedy renewal of an expanded authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to monitor the US e-mails and phone calls of overseas targets in an effort to prevent international terrorist attacks on the country.  It is unclear, however, how quickly the full Congress will act to reauthorize the provision in the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, as the law is known. The committee’s vote was to extend it through June 2017.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/Gaw5fgRphSY" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Military leaders urge ratification of Law of the Sea Treaty</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/military-leaders-urge-ratification-of-law-of-the-sea-treaty.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/military-leaders-urge-ratification-of-law-of-the-sea-treaty.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebba9a9a970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T15:32:53-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T15:32:53-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: The Washington Times reports top US military officials urged Congress Wednesday to ratify the Law of the Sea Treaty, noting a more assertive China, a race for maritime energy resources, and a need to keep sea navigation free. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said the US currently abides by customary international laws with regard to the sea, but added that, without a stronger international legal regime, the US is forced to use “gunboat diplomacy” to assert American rights on the sea. “It puts our warships on point to constantly challenge claims,” Army General Martin Dempsey told...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jb&gt;International Law / Law of War / Human Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Maritime Security" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/23/military-leaders-urge-ratification-sea-treaty/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS" target="_self">Washington Times</a> reports top US military officials urged Congress Wednesday to ratify the Law of the Sea Treaty, noting a more assertive China, a race for maritime energy resources, and a need to keep sea navigation free.  The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said the US currently abides by customary international laws with regard to the sea, but added that, without a stronger international legal regime, the US is forced to use “gunboat diplomacy” to assert American rights on the sea.  “It puts our warships on point to constantly challenge claims,” Army General Martin Dempsey told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.  “The force of arms does not have to be and should not be our only national security instrument.”</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/KbxNq6UsXnY" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Turkey may indict Israeli generals over flotilla raid</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/turkey-may-indict-israeli-generals-over-flotilla-raid.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/turkey-may-indict-israeli-generals-over-flotilla-raid.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305c4de6c970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T15:02:38-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T15:02:38-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: The New York Times reports a prosecutor in Turkey has prepared indictments and recommended life sentences for four senior Israeli generals over the killing of nine activists aboard a Gaza-bound aid flotilla forcibly intercepted by Israeli commandos two years ago. The indictments, which have not been formally approved by the Turkish judiciary, could further strain the once-close relations between Turkey and Israel, which deteriorated badly after the flotilla raid on May 31, 2010. Turkey’s semiofficial Anatolia News Agency said the indictment would seek life imprisonment for Gabi Ashkenazi, the former chief of general staff for the Israel Defense Forces;...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!w&gt;Middle East / Northern Africa" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Maritime Security" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/24/world/middleeast/turkey-may-indict-israeli-generals-over-flotilla-raid.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_self">New York Times</a> reports a prosecutor in Turkey has prepared indictments and recommended life sentences for four senior Israeli generals over the killing of nine activists aboard a Gaza-bound aid flotilla forcibly intercepted by Israeli commandos two years ago.  The indictments, which have not been formally approved by the Turkish judiciary, could further strain the once-close relations between Turkey and Israel, which deteriorated badly after the flotilla raid on May 31, 2010.  Turkey’s semiofficial Anatolia News Agency said the indictment would seek life imprisonment for Gabi Ashkenazi, the former chief of general staff for the Israel Defense Forces; Vice Adm. Eliezer Marom, former commander of naval forces; Gen. Amos Yadlin, the former military intelligence chief; and Brig. Gen. Avishai Levy, the former head of air force intelligence.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/ldwsu99ZtyY" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Scholarship: History, Hamdan, and happenstance: conspiracy to violate the law of war</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/scholarship-history-hamdan-and-happenstance-conspiracy-to-violate-the-law-of-war.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/scholarship-history-hamdan-and-happenstance-conspiracy-to-violate-the-law-of-war.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766b8d9ba970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T14:57:22-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T19:30:18-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: The Harvard National Security Journal has this article by Haridimos V. Thravalos discussing whether conspiracy to violate the law of war is, by itself, a war crime. In June 2006, a plurality of the Supreme Court in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld determined that the Government failed to make a colorable case for the inclusion of conspiracy among those offenses cognizable by law-of-war military commission. The article, however, examines and expounds upon the domestic law sources and precedents, spanning from the Civil War to beyond World War II, that inform the issues, and concludes that a thorough analysis of historical evidence...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jb&gt;International Law / Law of War / Human Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jc&gt;Constitutional Law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!y&gt;Commentary / Opinion" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: The<a href="http://harvardnsj.org/2012/05/history-hamdan-and-happenstance-conspiracy-by-two-or-more-to-violate-the-laws-of-war-by-destroying-life-or-property-in-aid-of-the-enemy/" target="_self"> Harvard National Security Journal</a> has this article by Haridimos V. Thravalos discussing whether conspiracy to violate the law of war is, by itself, a war crime.  In June 2006, a plurality of the Supreme Court in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld determined that the Government failed to make a colorable case for the inclusion of conspiracy among those offenses cognizable by law-of-war military commission.  The article, however, examines and expounds upon the domestic law sources and precedents, spanning from the Civil War to beyond World War II, that inform the issues, and concludes that a thorough analysis of historical evidence shows that conspiracy to violate the law of war is, itself, a violation of the law of war that has traditionally and lawfully been tried by law-of-war military commission.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/jMfwb2svkvU" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Russia reports successful test of missile</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/russia-reports-successful-test-of-missile.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/russia-reports-successful-test-of-missile.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766b654ca970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T09:07:45-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T09:07:45-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: The New York Times reports Russia's military announced a successful test on Wednesday of a new type of intercontinental ballistic missile that generals said was designed to overpower the American missile defense system. Russian generals told news agencies that the missile's technological development was a direct response to the American plans for a shield. The rocket, they said, uses a new type of fuel to shorten the time it needs to launch into space, increasing its ability to evade interceptors. Whatever its military significance, the launch, as with other prominently announced tests, seemed intended as much to deliver a...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!u&gt;Europe / Eurasia" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/24/world/europe/russia-reports-successful-test-of-missile.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_self">New York Times</a> reports Russia's military announced a successful test on Wednesday of a new type of intercontinental ballistic missile that generals said was designed to overpower the American missile defense system.  Russian generals told news agencies that the missile's technological development was a direct response to the American plans for a shield. The rocket, they said, uses a new type of fuel to shorten the time it needs to launch into space, increasing its ability to evade interceptors.  Whatever its military significance, the launch, as with other prominently announced tests, seemed intended as much to deliver a political message as demonstrate the rocket’s ability to streak across Russia and hit a target on the Kamchatka Peninsula.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/4YrlyG6cNGw" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Analysis: Romney goes silent on Afghanistan</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/analysis-romney-goes-silent-on-afghanistan.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/analysis-romney-goes-silent-on-afghanistan.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebb7c646970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T09:05:03-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T09:05:03-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: The Hill reports Mitt Romney has muted his attacks on President Obama’s strategy in Afghanistan despite several recent significant events regarding the future of the conflict. The presumptive GOP presidential nominee declined to criticize Obama after he announced the US-Afghan strategic partnership agreement earlier this month that aims to end the war and give security control to the Afghans in 2014. The silence on Afghanistan is noticeable from Romney, given his sharp criticism of Obama on the issue during the GOP primaries. At the time, he accused the president of ignoring the advice of military commanders and announcing a...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!q&gt;Afghanistan / Pakistan" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Analysis" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/policy-and-strategy/228987-romney-goes-silent-on-afghanistan-" target="_self">The Hill</a> reports Mitt Romney has muted his attacks on President Obama’s strategy in Afghanistan despite several recent significant events regarding the future of the conflict.  The presumptive GOP presidential nominee declined to criticize Obama after he announced the US-Afghan strategic partnership agreement earlier this month that aims to end the war and give security control to the Afghans in 2014.  The silence on Afghanistan is noticeable from Romney, given his sharp criticism of Obama on the issue during the GOP primaries. At the time, he accused the president of ignoring the advice of military commanders and announcing a timetable for withdrawal.  But with the Afghanistan war tumbling to all-time lows in public support, it has become difficult for Romney to contrast his policies with Obama’s without advocating a longer war.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/tylZ_JkmMGY" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Afghan security force breaks up multiple terror plots</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/afghan-security-force-breaks-up-multiple-terror-plots.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/afghan-security-force-breaks-up-multiple-terror-plots.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebb7bea2970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T09:00:52-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T09:09:03-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: The Long War Journal reports that over the past few weeks, Afghan National Directorate of Security (NDS) operatives have arrested over a dozen Taliban and Pakistani militants and confiscated over ten tons of homemade explosive precursors and hundreds of anti-personnel landmines, effectively thwarting multiple plots by the Afghan Taliban to carry out its much flaunted "Al Farooq" spring offensive. NDS spokesman Lutfullah Mashal explained to reporters that Afghan intelligence operations thwarted a Taliban plot to attack the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) office in Jalalabad in Nangarhar province, according to Pajhwok News and NDS interrogation footage made...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!h&gt;Intelligence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!q&gt;Afghanistan / Pakistan" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: The <a href="http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2012/05/afghan_nds_breaks_up.php" target="_self">Long War Journal</a> reports that over the past few weeks, Afghan National Directorate of Security (NDS) operatives have arrested over a dozen Taliban and Pakistani militants and confiscated over ten tons of homemade explosive precursors and hundreds of anti-personnel landmines, effectively thwarting multiple plots by the Afghan Taliban to carry out its much flaunted "Al Farooq" spring offensive.  NDS spokesman Lutfullah Mashal explained to reporters that Afghan intelligence operations thwarted a Taliban plot to attack the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) office in Jalalabad in Nangarhar province, according to Pajhwok News and NDS interrogation footage made available to journalists.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/t1V9lt0B5CI" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Spy agency seeks cyber-ops curriculum</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/spy-agency-seeks-cyber-ops-curriculum.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/spy-agency-seeks-cyber-ops-curriculum.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebb7b590970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T08:55:32-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T08:55:32-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: Reuters reports the National Security Agency (NSA) is trying to expand US cyber expertise needed for secret intelligence operations against adversaries on computer networks through a new cyber-ops program at selected universities. The cyber-ops curriculum is geared to providing the basic education for jobs in intelligence, military and law enforcement that are so secret they will only be revealed to some students and faculty, who need to pass security clearance requirements, during special summer seminars offered by NSA. The "quality cyber operators" the NSA is looking for are few and far between, says Neal Ziring, technical director at the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!h&gt;Intelligence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cyberlaw / Cyber Security" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: <a href="www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/22/us-usa-intelligence-education-idUSBRE84L12T20120522" target="_self">Reuters</a> reports the National Security Agency (NSA) is trying to expand US cyber expertise needed for secret intelligence operations against adversaries on computer networks through a new cyber-ops program at selected universities.  The cyber-ops curriculum is geared to providing the basic education for jobs in intelligence, military and law enforcement that are so secret they will only be revealed to some students and faculty, who need to pass security clearance requirements, during special summer seminars offered by NSA.  The "quality cyber operators" the NSA is looking for are few and far between, says Neal Ziring, technical director at the agency's Information Assurance Directorate.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/8Bmc9KlnL9U" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Israel: Iran deal doesn't rule out possible strike</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/israel-iran-deal-doesnt-rule-out-possible-strike.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/israel-iran-deal-doesnt-rule-out-possible-strike.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305c2272b970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T08:45:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T08:45:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: The Miami Herald reports Israel's defense minister says Iran's preliminary agreement to open its nuclear facilities to UN inspectors doesn't rule out a possible Israeli military strike. Ehud Barak said on Wednesday that he's skeptical about the deal, which he calls an Iranian ploy to fend off international pressure to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Barak reiterated Israel’s stance that a "nuclear Iran is intolerable and no options should be taken off the table."</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!w&gt;Middle East / Northern Africa" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Iran" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Nuclear Weapons " />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: The <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/23/2813146/israel-iran-deal-doesnt-rule-out.html" target="_self">Miami Herald</a> reports Israel's defense minister says Iran's preliminary agreement to open its nuclear facilities to UN inspectors doesn't rule out a possible Israeli military strike.  Ehud Barak said on Wednesday that he's skeptical about the deal, which he calls an Iranian ploy to fend off international pressure to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions.  Barak reiterated Israel’s stance that a "nuclear Iran is intolerable and no options should be taken off the table."</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/qFw4QA8NMIY" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>White House: sanctions will move forward despite progress in talks with Iran</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/white-house-sanctions-will-move-forward-despite-progress-in-talks-with-iran.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/white-house-sanctions-will-move-forward-despite-progress-in-talks-with-iran.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebb7a196970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T08:42:20-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T08:42:20-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: The Washington Times reports the White House says it will not immediately lift sanctions on Iran as a result of progress in talks to allow an investigation into Tehran’s nuclear program. The UN nuclear watchdog’s director said Tuesday that he expects to sign a deal with Iran to grant international monitors access to its nuclear facilities, which the West believes, but Tehran denies, are being used to produce atom bombs. The development comes one day before six world powers — the US, the UK, France, Germany, China and Russia — meet Iran’s security council in Baghdad to discuss greater...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Iran" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Nuclear Weapons " />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/22/white-house-sanctions-iran-will-move-forward/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS" target="_self">Washington Times</a> reports the White House says it will not immediately lift sanctions on Iran as a result of progress in talks to allow an investigation into Tehran’s nuclear program.  The UN nuclear watchdog’s director said Tuesday that he expects to sign a deal with Iran to grant international monitors access to its nuclear facilities, which the West believes, but Tehran denies, are being used to produce atom bombs.  The development comes one day before six world powers — the US, the UK, France, Germany, China and Russia — meet Iran’s security council in Baghdad to discuss greater transparency of the nuclear program.  “We will make judgments about Iran’s behavior based on actions, not just agreements,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/-CR0UybF_4o" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Levin: no changes coming to detainee provisions in Senate defense bill</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/levin-no-changes-coming-to-detainee-provisions-in-senate-defense-bill.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/levin-no-changes-coming-to-detainee-provisions-in-senate-defense-bill.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305c21c98970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T08:38:11-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T08:38:11-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: The Hill reports Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said he does not plan to make any changes to the detainee language in the Senate's defense authorization bill, which was recently struck down by the US District Court in New York. Levin told reporters Tuesday he was “satisfied” with the language that was in last year’s defense bill, and he disagreed with the way the court interpreted the law. “We did not change the law in last year’s bill on this subject at all,” Levin told reporters Tuesday. “We didn’t change what the rights of the president...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jc&gt;Constitutional Law" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/policy-and-strategy/228885-levin-says-no-changes-coming-to-detainee-laws-in-senate-defense-bill" target="_self">The Hill</a> reports Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said he does not plan to make any changes to the detainee language in the Senate's defense authorization bill, which was recently struck down by the US District Court in New York.  Levin told reporters Tuesday he was “satisfied” with the language that was in last year’s defense bill, and he disagreed with the way the court interpreted the law.  “We did not change the law in last year’s bill on this subject at all,” Levin told reporters Tuesday. “We didn’t change what the rights of the president are.”  He added that he was confident that the administration would be able to appeal the District Court ruling.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/VdCv9fFuGrY" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Pakistan jails doctor who helped CIA find Bin Laden</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/pakistan-jails-doctor-who-helped-cia-find-bin-laden.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/pakistan-jails-doctor-who-helped-cia-find-bin-laden.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305c2195b970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-23T08:35:41-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-23T08:35:41-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/23/12: BBC News reports a Pakistani doctor who helped the CIA find Osama Bin Laden has been jailed for at least 30 years. Shakil Afridi was charged with treason for running a fake vaccination program to gather information. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had called for his release on the grounds that his work served Pakistani and American interests. Bin Laden was killed by US forces in the north-western city of Abbottabad in May 2011. The killing triggered a rift between the US and Pakistan, whose government was seriously embarrassed to find Bin Laden had been living in Pakistan. Shortly...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!h&gt;Intelligence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!q&gt;Afghanistan / Pakistan" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/23/12: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-18175964" target="_self">BBC News</a> reports a Pakistani doctor who helped the CIA find Osama Bin Laden has been jailed for at least 30 years.  Shakil Afridi was charged with treason for running a fake vaccination program to gather information.  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had called for his release on the grounds that his work served Pakistani and American interests.  Bin Laden was killed by US forces in the north-western city of Abbottabad in May 2011.  The killing triggered a rift between the US and Pakistan, whose government was seriously embarrassed to find Bin Laden had been living in Pakistan.  Shortly after the raid on Bin Laden's house, Dr. Afridi was arrested for conspiring against the state of Pakistan.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/oUJk_RThvCE" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>UN prosecutor wants Mladic trial to start within weeks</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/un-prosecutor-wants-mladic-trial-to-start-within-weeks.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/un-prosecutor-wants-mladic-trial-to-start-within-weeks.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766af63ce970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T14:56:04-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T14:56:04-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: The Miami Herald reports the chief UN prosecutor for the former Yugoslavia said Tuesday that evidence errors that postponed the trial of Ratko Mladic are of "limited" impact and do not warrant a delay of six months as sought by the defense. Serge Brammertz said during a visit to Serbia that the prosecution believes the long-awaited proceedings against the former Bosnian Serb army commander accused of genocide could start within weeks. A judge at the UN tribunal in The Hague earlier this month postponed Mladic's trial citing "significant disclosure errors" by prosecutors, who are obliged to share all evidence...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jb&gt;International Law / Law of War / Human Rights" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!u&gt;Europe / Eurasia" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: The <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/22/2812020/un-prosecutor-mladic-trial-should.html" target="_self">Miami Herald</a> reports the chief UN prosecutor for the former Yugoslavia said Tuesday that evidence errors that postponed the trial of Ratko Mladic are of "limited" impact and do not warrant a delay of six months as sought by the defense.  Serge Brammertz said during a visit to Serbia that the prosecution believes the long-awaited proceedings against the former Bosnian Serb army commander accused of genocide could start within weeks.  A judge at the UN tribunal in The Hague earlier this month postponed Mladic's trial citing "significant disclosure errors" by prosecutors, who are obliged to share all evidence with the defense.  Mladic is accused of commanding Bosnian Serb troops who waged a campaign of killings and persecution to drive Muslims and Croats out of Serb-held territory during the Bosnian War.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/a2IBtHmjx2w" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Four Senators propose easing visa limits for highly skilled</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/four-senators-propose-easing-visa-limits-for-highly-skilled.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/four-senators-propose-easing-visa-limits-for-highly-skilled.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305bb4951970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T14:52:43-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T14:52:43-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: The New York Times reports a bipartisan group of four senators proposed easing visa limits for highly skilled immigrants and foreign students on Tuesday, a move that challenges congressional leaders on their fixed positions on the issue of immigration during an election year. Two Democrats, Senators Mark Warner of Virginia and Chris Coons of Delaware, and two Republicans, Senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Jerry Moran of Kansas, introduced the legislation, which is a break for both parties. Democrats have traditionally held highly skilled worker visas as a bargaining chip for measures on lower-skilled immigrants that are far less...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!g&gt;Homeland Security / Immigration" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: The <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/4-senators-propose-easing-visa-limits-for-highly-skilled/?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_self">New York Times</a> reports a bipartisan group of four senators proposed easing visa limits for highly skilled immigrants and foreign students on Tuesday, a move that challenges congressional leaders on their fixed positions on the issue of immigration during an election year.  Two Democrats, Senators Mark Warner of Virginia and Chris Coons of Delaware, and two Republicans, Senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Jerry Moran of Kansas, introduced the legislation, which is a break for both parties. Democrats have traditionally held highly skilled worker visas as a bargaining chip for measures on lower-skilled immigrants that are far less politically popular. Many Republicans have opposed any expansion of visas.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/VdebPe6XHxg" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Iran, UN reported close to deal to unveil past nuclear research</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/iran-un-reported-close-to-deal-to-unveil-past-nuclear-research.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/iran-un-reported-close-to-deal-to-unveil-past-nuclear-research.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766af59a0970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T14:49:51-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T14:49:51-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: The Washington Post reports UN officials said Tuesday that Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) are near agreement on a plan that could lift the veil on some of the Islamic Republic’s past nuclear research. The announcement raised hopes for a more comprehensive nuclear accord when Iranian officials meet with six world powers later in the week. IAEA head Yukiya Amano said UN and Iranian officials settled most of their differences during talks Monday in Tehran and were moving toward a formal pact on making Iran’s nuclear activities more transparent. While a few obstacles remain, a “decision...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Iran" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Nuclear Weapons " />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/iran-un-said-to-be-near-agreement-on-plan-to-investigate-irans-past-nuclear-research/2012/05/22/gIQAtCB4hU_story.html?wprss=rss_world" target="_self">Washington Post</a> reports UN officials said Tuesday that Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) are near agreement on a plan that could lift the veil on some of the Islamic Republic’s past nuclear research.  The announcement raised hopes for a more comprehensive nuclear accord when Iranian officials meet with six world powers later in the week.  IAEA head Yukiya Amano said UN and Iranian officials settled most of their differences during talks Monday in Tehran and were moving toward a formal pact on making Iran’s nuclear activities more transparent.  While a few obstacles remain, a “decision was made to conclude and sign the agreement,” Amano said.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/ym-TZ-hKnss" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Restrictions on WikiLeaks documents challenged in court</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/restrictions-on-wikileaks-documents-challenged-in-court.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/restrictions-on-wikileaks-documents-challenged-in-court.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766af51f3970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T14:45:31-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T14:45:31-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: Secrecy News reports the publication of leaked classified documents by WikiLeaks continues to confound government officials and to generate some unusual legal tangles. Last month, attorneys for a prisoner detained at Guantanamo Bay asked a federal court to nullify the restrictions that the government has imposed on access to and dissemination of the leaked records, so that the prisoner can prepare a response to the disclosures contained in them. The government policy on this matter is unworkable and incoherent, argued attorneys for detainee Abdulhadi Omer Mahmoud Faraj in an April 18 motion in the US District Court for the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!l&gt;Detainees / Guantanamo" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!o&gt;State Secrets Privilege / CIPA" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cyberlaw / Cyber Security" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: <a href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/05/wikileaks_faraj.html" target="_self">Secrecy News</a> reports the publication of leaked classified documents by WikiLeaks continues to confound government officials and to generate some unusual legal tangles.  Last month, attorneys for a prisoner detained at Guantanamo Bay asked a federal court to nullify the restrictions that the government has imposed on access to and dissemination of the leaked records, so that the prisoner can prepare a response to the disclosures contained in them.  The government policy on this matter is unworkable and incoherent, argued attorneys for detainee Abdulhadi Omer Mahmoud Faraj in an April 18 motion in the US District Court for the District of Columbia.  Worse, they said, it is damaging and unfair to their client.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/fxh7ddoqer0" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Commentary: Retired General James Cartwright offers a fresh view on defense</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/commentary-retired-general-james-cartwright-offers-a-fresh-view-on-defense.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/commentary-retired-general-james-cartwright-offers-a-fresh-view-on-defense.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766ad035a970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T08:49:16-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T08:49:16-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: The Washington Post features a column by Walter Pincus discussing retired Marine Corps General James Cartwright, who argues that Congress’ priorities are misplaced as they try to make cuts at the Department of Defense. The former vice-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff questioned the emphasis on additional manned aircraft, tanks and land vehicles, saying unmanned systems will prove more effective. Although the United States has taken a volunteer force through a decade of war, Cartwright said, “we have not taken an all-volunteer force through a downturn when resources become stretched.” Voicing concern about recruitment and retention, he said,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!y&gt;Commentary / Opinion" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/retired-gen-james-cartwright-offers-a-fresh-view-on-defense/2012/05/21/gIQArRMTgU_story.html?wprss=rss_politics" target="_self">Washington Post</a> features a column by Walter Pincus discussing retired Marine Corps General James Cartwright, who argues that Congress’ priorities are misplaced as they try to make cuts at the Department of Defense.  The former vice-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff questioned the emphasis on additional manned aircraft, tanks and land vehicles, saying unmanned systems will prove more effective.  Although the United States has taken a volunteer force through a decade of war, Cartwright said, “we have not taken an all-volunteer force through a downturn when resources become stretched.”  Voicing concern about recruitment and retention, he said, “How we entice people to stay is something that we have really not done in the past.”</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/Abp1GcqPgSQ" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>New Jersey Muslims, state officials to discuss NYPD surveillance</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/new-jersey-muslims-state-officials-to-discuss-nypd-surveillance.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/new-jersey-muslims-state-officials-to-discuss-nypd-surveillance.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebae9656970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T08:40:28-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T08:40:28-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: The Miami Herald reports New Jersey Muslim leaders who attended a March meeting with the state's Attorney General have been invited back this week for a follow-up discussion. It will focus on the state's response to revelations that the New York Police Department (NYPD) conducted secret surveillance of Muslims in New Jersey. Muslim leaders and others critical of the NYPD's activities hope the AG will announce at Thursday's meeting a formal investigation into the NYPD's activities in New Jersey, although several privately expressed doubt that would be the result. NYPD officials have defended the surveillance as lawful.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!f&gt;Law Enforcement / Criminal Law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!p&gt;Surveillance / Privacy" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: The <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/21/2810722/nj-muslims-officials-to-discuss.html" target="_self">Miami Herald</a> reports New Jersey Muslim leaders who attended a March meeting with the state's Attorney General have been invited back this week for a follow-up discussion.  It will focus on the state's response to revelations that the New York Police Department (NYPD) conducted secret surveillance of Muslims in New Jersey.  Muslim leaders and others critical of the NYPD's activities hope the AG will announce at Thursday's meeting a formal investigation into the NYPD's activities in New Jersey, although several privately expressed doubt that would be the result.  NYPD officials have defended the surveillance as lawful.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/RPg-qSAuUsU" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Pentagon's role minimized in selecting drone targets</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/pentagons-role-minimized-in-selecting-drone-targets.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/pentagons-role-minimized-in-selecting-drone-targets.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebae8e1e970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T08:34:13-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T08:34:13-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: The Army Times reports White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan has seized the lead in guiding the debate on which terror leaders will be targeted for drone attacks or raids, establishing a new procedure to vet both military and CIA targets. The move concentrates power over the use of lethal US force outside war zones at the White House. The process, which is about a month old, means Brennan’s staff consults the Pentagon, the State Department and other agencies as to who should go on the list, making a previous military-run review process in place since 2009 less relevant,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!h&gt;Intelligence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: The <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2012/05/ap-plan-lessens-pentagon-role-deciding-drone-targets-john-brennan-052112/" target="_self">Army Times</a> reports White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan has seized the lead in guiding the debate on which terror leaders will be targeted for drone attacks or raids, establishing a new procedure to vet both military and CIA targets.  The move concentrates power over the use of lethal US force outside war zones at the White House.  The process, which is about a month old, means Brennan’s staff consults the Pentagon, the State Department and other agencies as to who should go on the list, making a previous military-run review process in place since 2009 less relevant, according to two current and three former US officials aware of the evolution in how the government targets terrorists.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/90bMbwUzp7s" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Iran talks with UN nuclear watchdog seen as "positive," but outcome unclear</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/iran-talks-with-un-nuclear-watchdog-seen-as-positive-but-outcome-unclear.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/iran-talks-with-un-nuclear-watchdog-seen-as-positive-but-outcome-unclear.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebae7f4c970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T08:23:47-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T08:23:47-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: The Washington Post reports the head of the UN nuclear watchdog and Iranian officials held a day of high-level talks Monday that both sides described as “positive,” but it remained unclear whether Iran had given ground on allowing access to key nuclear scientists and research facilities. Yukiya Amano, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), traveled to Iran over the weekend for the unusual session and afterward praised his hosts, saying they engaged constructively with the agency. Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, also hailed what he described as “very good talks” with the IAEA leader, but...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Iran" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Nuclear Weapons " />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/iran-talks-with-un-watchdog-seen-as-positive-but-outcome-unclear/2012/05/21/gIQAzR4YgU_story.html?wprss=rss_world" target="_self">Washington Post</a> reports the head of the UN nuclear watchdog and Iranian officials held a day of high-level talks Monday that both sides described as “positive,” but it remained unclear whether Iran had given ground on allowing access to key nuclear scientists and research facilities.  Yukiya Amano, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), traveled to Iran over the weekend for the unusual session and afterward praised his hosts, saying they engaged constructively with the agency.  Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, also hailed what he described as “very good talks” with the IAEA leader, but neither man spoke in detail about the issue at the heart of the visit: Iran’s refusal to satisfy the nuclear watchdog’s questions about its past nuclear research.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/t3TiUPJKpuY" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>NATO accepts Obama timetable to end Afghanistan War by 2014</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/nato-accepts-obama-timetable-to-end-afghanistan-war-by-2014.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/nato-accepts-obama-timetable-to-end-afghanistan-war-by-2014.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebae7933970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T08:18:23-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T08:18:23-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: CNN reports NATO leaders signed off Monday on President Barack Obama's exit strategy from Afghanistan that calls for an end to combat operations next year and the withdrawal of the US-led international military force by the end of 2014. Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters at the conclusion of a two-day summit of the alliance leaders that the plan calls for handing over security responsibilities to Afghan forces in 2013, then withdrawing foreign forces the following year. After that, a new and different NATO mission will advise, train and assist the expected 350,000-strong Afghanistan force, Rasmussen said. Obama...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!q&gt;Afghanistan / Pakistan" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: <a href="http://articles.cnn.com/2012-05-21/us/us_nato-summit_1_international-security-assistance-force-nato-forces-isaf?_s=PM:US" target="_self">CNN</a> reports NATO leaders signed off Monday on President Barack Obama's exit strategy from Afghanistan that calls for an end to combat operations next year and the withdrawal of the US-led international military force by the end of 2014.  Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters at the conclusion of a two-day summit of the alliance leaders that the plan calls for handing over security responsibilities to Afghan forces in 2013, then withdrawing foreign forces the following year. After that, a new and different NATO mission will advise, train and assist the expected 350,000-strong Afghanistan force, Rasmussen said.  Obama said NATO leaders were leaving Chicago with "a clear road map" to bring the war in Afghanistan to a "responsible end."</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/EMeUuEV8DTM" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Senate approves bill to tighten Iran sanctions</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/senate-approves-bill-to-tighten-iran-sanctions.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/senate-approves-bill-to-tighten-iran-sanctions.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebae73c7970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T08:14:35-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T08:14:35-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: BBC News reports the US Senate has approved a bill to tighten sanctions against Iran in a bid to force Tehran to abandon its nuclear program. The new sanctions will target Iran's Revolutionary Guard and investigate its role in the export of oil from the country. It will also make it mandatory for US-listed firms to disclose any Iran-related business to the authorities. The move comes ahead of crucial talks on Iran's nuclear program. "Today the US Senate put Iranian leaders on notice that they must halt all uranium enrichment activities or face another round of economic sanctions," Senator...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Iran" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Nuclear Weapons " />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18155819" target="_self">BBC News</a> reports the US Senate has approved a bill to tighten sanctions against Iran in a bid to force Tehran to abandon its nuclear program.  The new sanctions will target Iran's Revolutionary Guard and investigate its role in the export of oil from the country.  It will also make it mandatory for US-listed firms to disclose any Iran-related business to the authorities.  The move comes ahead of crucial talks on Iran's nuclear program.  "Today the US Senate put Iranian leaders on notice that they must halt all uranium enrichment activities or face another round of economic sanctions," Senator Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) said in a statement.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/WxcAyRqQdzY" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Dozens killed by bomb in Yemen, raising al-Qaeda fears</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/dozens-killed-by-bomb-in-yemen-raising-al-qaeda-fears.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/dozens-killed-by-bomb-in-yemen-raising-al-qaeda-fears.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766acd1fe970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T08:11:37-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T08:11:37-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: The New York Times reports a huge suicide bombing in the heart of Yemen’s capital Monday left more than 100 people dead and hundreds wounded, stunning the country’s beleaguered government and delivering a stark setback to the American counterterrorism campaign against al-Qaeda’s regional franchise, which has repeatedly tried to plant bombs on United States-bound jetliners. Militants allied with al-Qaeda quickly claimed responsibility for the bombing, in which a man disguised as a soldier blew himself up in the midst of a military parade rehearsal near the presidential palace in Sanaa, the capital. It was the deadliest terrorist attack in...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!w&gt;Middle East / Northern Africa" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/world/middleeast/dozens-killed-by-bomb-in-yemen-raising-al-qaeda-fears.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_self">New York Times</a> reports a huge suicide bombing in the heart of Yemen’s capital Monday left more than 100 people dead and hundreds wounded, stunning the country’s beleaguered government and delivering a stark setback to the American counterterrorism campaign against al-Qaeda’s regional franchise, which has repeatedly tried to plant bombs on United States-bound jetliners.  Militants allied with al-Qaeda quickly claimed responsibility for the bombing, in which a man disguised as a soldier blew himself up in the midst of a military parade rehearsal near the presidential palace in Sanaa, the capital.  It was the deadliest terrorist attack in years in Yemen, the south Arabian country that is now central to United States concerns about terrorism.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/1Z41ySFaZxU" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>2nd Circuit shields CIA interrogation documents</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/2nd-circuit-shields-cia-interrogation-documents.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/2nd-circuit-shields-cia-interrogation-documents.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168ebae6891970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-22T08:06:05-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-22T08:06:05-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/22/12: Reuters reports a federal appeals court has ruled the CIA does not have to disclose records of interrogation techniques used against terrorism suspects in 2002. The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups had sued the CIA in 2004 for documents relating to its secret detention and interrogation program for prisoners in US custody overseas. The US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit found that the requested records were shielded from a long-standing Freedom of Information Act request brought by the civil liberties groups. The ACLU argued that interrogation tactics such as waterboarding had been declared illegal by...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!h&gt;Intelligence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!m&gt;Secrecy / Transparency / FOIA" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/22/12: <a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2012/05_-_May/2nd_Circuit_shields_CIA_interrogation_documents/" target="_self">Reuters</a> reports a federal appeals court has ruled the CIA does not have to disclose records of interrogation techniques used against terrorism suspects in 2002.  The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups had sued the CIA in 2004 for documents relating to its secret detention and interrogation program for prisoners in US custody overseas.  The US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit found that the requested records were shielded from a long-standing Freedom of Information Act request brought by the civil liberties groups.  The ACLU argued that interrogation tactics such as waterboarding had been declared illegal by President Barack Obama and were not entitled to protection.  But the 2nd Circuit panel rejected that argument, affirming a district judge's ruling that kept the photograph and documents secret.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/9F6hgjpeK2E" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>US envoy warns North Korea against nuclear test</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/us-envoy-warns-north-korea-against-nuclear-test.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/us-envoy-warns-north-korea-against-nuclear-test.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168eba8fbe7970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T14:00:55-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T14:00:55-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: CNN reports the top US envoy for North Korea warned Pyongyang Monday against a possible third nuclear test. "I think it would be a serious miscalculation and mistake if North Korea works to engage in a nuclear test," Glyn Davies told reporters following a meeting with his South Korean and Japanese counterparts in Seoul. He pointed to the international condemnation following the recent rocket launch, saying Pyongyang knows what kind of response a further provocation would elicit. Many analysts assume an atomic test by North Korea is just a matter of time following the failure of Pyongyang's rocket launch...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!t&gt;Asia" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Nuclear Weapons " />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/21/world/asia/north-korea-us-warning/index.html?eref=rss_world&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_world+%28RSS%3A+World%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_self">CNN</a> reports the top US envoy for North Korea warned Pyongyang Monday against a possible third nuclear test.  "I think it would be a serious miscalculation and mistake if North Korea works to engage in a nuclear test," Glyn Davies told reporters following a meeting with his South Korean and Japanese counterparts in Seoul.  He pointed to the international condemnation following the recent rocket launch, saying Pyongyang knows what kind of response a further provocation would elicit.  Many analysts assume an atomic test by North Korea is just a matter of time following the failure of Pyongyang's rocket launch on April 13.  Two previous rocket launches in 2006 and 2009 were followed by a nuclear test.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/3AJcEX033A0" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Analysis: Chen saga ends on encouraging note for US-China ties</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/analysis-chen-saga-ends-on-encouraging-note-for-us-china-ties-1.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/analysis-chen-saga-ends-on-encouraging-note-for-us-china-ties-1.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168eba8f4d0970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T13:55:50-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T13:55:50-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: The Washington Post writes that for two nations whose exchanges are perennially fraught with tension and distrust, the arrival of blind activist Chen Guangcheng in New York during the weekend marked a tidy conclusion to a month-long diplomatic drama and an encouraging sign for US-Chinese ties. That the two sides were able to resolve a crisis amid intense pressure points to a possible maturation in the relationship — a sign that Washington and Beijing are, cautiously, learning to hash out disagreements even under the most trying circumstances. But the way the Chen saga played out also suggests that certain...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!t&gt;Asia" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Analysis" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/chen-saga-ends-on-encouraging-note-for-us-china-ties/2012/05/20/gIQA2aVCeU_story.html?wprss=rss_world" target="_self">Washington Post</a> writes that for two nations whose exchanges are perennially fraught with tension and distrust, the arrival of blind activist Chen Guangcheng in New York during the weekend marked a tidy conclusion to a month-long diplomatic drama and an encouraging sign for US-Chinese ties.  That the two sides were able to resolve a crisis amid intense pressure points to a possible maturation in the relationship — a sign that Washington and Beijing are, cautiously, learning to hash out disagreements even under the most trying circumstances.  But the way the Chen saga played out also suggests that certain fissures make their way into other areas of the relationship no matter how hard both sides try to contain them.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/Poe7z90ebkQ" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>NATO formally agrees to transition on Afghan security</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/nato-formally-agrees-to-transition-on-afghan-security.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/nato-formally-agrees-to-transition-on-afghan-security.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305b328a3970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T13:49:58-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T13:49:58-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: The New York Times reports President Obama and leaders of America’s NATO allies formally agreed on Monday to hand over the primary role in providing security in Afghanistan to the Afghans themselves next summer, beginning the end of America’s involvement in a decade-long war. In a declaration at the summit meeting of the twenty-eight-member alliance, the leaders insisted that the transition was “irreversible.” The declaration says the allies are "gradually and responsibly drawing down our forces” to complete the Afghanistan mission by December 2014, when the rest of the American-led NATO troops in Afghanistan are supposed to come home.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!q&gt;Afghanistan / Pakistan" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/world/nato-formally-agrees-to-transition-on-afghan-security.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_self">New York Times</a> reports President Obama and leaders of America’s NATO allies formally agreed on Monday to hand over the primary role in providing security in Afghanistan to the Afghans themselves next summer, beginning the end of America’s involvement in a decade-long war.  In a declaration at the summit meeting of the twenty-eight-member alliance, the leaders insisted that the transition was “irreversible.”  The declaration says the allies are "gradually and responsibly drawing down our forces” to complete the Afghanistan mission by December 2014, when the rest of the American-led NATO troops in Afghanistan are supposed to come home.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/0s9taPFF1eQ" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>House votes to require investigation of leak of Israel-Iran information</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/house-votes-to-require-investigation-of-leak-of-israel-iran-information.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/house-votes-to-require-investigation-of-leak-of-israel-iran-information.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168eba8ea1e970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T13:45:56-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T13:45:56-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: Secrecy News reports the House of Representatives last week adopted an amendment to require the Attorney General to conduct a criminal investigation into “leaks of sensitive information involving the military, intelligence, and operational capabilities of the United States and Israel.” Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), who sponsored the amendment to the fiscal year 2013 Defense Authorization Act, cited stories based on leaks concerning a potential Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities that were published in the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Foreign Policy. No one spoke in opposition to the amendment, which was approved May 18 by a...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!h&gt;Intelligence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!m&gt;Secrecy / Transparency / FOIA" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!w&gt;Middle East / Northern Africa" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Iran" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: <a href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2012/05/price_leak.html" target="_self">Secrecy News</a> reports the House of Representatives last week adopted an amendment to require the Attorney General to conduct a criminal investigation into “leaks of sensitive information involving the military, intelligence, and operational capabilities of the United States and Israel.”  Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), who sponsored the amendment to the fiscal year 2013 Defense Authorization Act, cited stories based on leaks concerning a potential Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities that were published in the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Foreign Policy.  No one spoke in opposition to the amendment, which was approved May 18 by a vote of 379-38.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/_ar8L683huw" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Supreme Court to rule on standing to challenge wiretapping law</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/supreme-court-to-rule-on-standing-to-challenge-wiretapping-law.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/supreme-court-to-rule-on-standing-to-challenge-wiretapping-law.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766a70ad8970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T13:33:29-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T13:34:44-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: JURIST reports the US Supreme Court granted certiorari Monday in Clapper v. Amnesty International USA to determine whether the plaintiffs have standing to challenge a federal eavesdropping law. The plaintiffs, including attorneys, journalists and rights organizations, facially challenged Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which was added in 2008. The law creates procedures to allow electronic government surveillance of individuals living outside of the US for foreign intelligence purposes. In 2009 the US District Court in Manhattan found that the plaintiffs lacked standing because they did not suffer an injury in fact and dismissed the suit,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!a&gt;Judiciary / Cases" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!h&gt;Intelligence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!jc&gt;Constitutional Law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!p&gt;Surveillance / Privacy" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: <a href="http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/05/supreme-court-to-rule-on-standing-to-challenge-wiretapping-law.php" target="_self">JURIST</a> reports the US Supreme Court granted certiorari Monday in Clapper v. Amnesty International USA to determine whether the plaintiffs have standing to challenge a federal eavesdropping law.  The plaintiffs, including attorneys, journalists and rights organizations, facially challenged Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which was added in 2008.  The law creates procedures to allow electronic government surveillance of individuals living outside of the US for foreign intelligence purposes.  In 2009 the US District Court in Manhattan found that the plaintiffs lacked standing because they did not suffer an injury in fact and dismissed the suit, but the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reinstated the lawsuit last year.  SCOTUSBlog's page for this case is <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/clapper-v-amnesty-international-usa/?wpmp_switcher=desktop" target="_self">here</a>.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/hkVv4y4PQJ8" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>NATO declares European missile shield up and running</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/nato-declares-european-missile-shield-up-and-running.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/nato-declares-european-missile-shield-up-and-running.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766a566c2970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T08:27:38-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T08:27:38-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: CBS News reports NATO says that its European missile shield is up and running with a basic capability to shoot down incoming missiles. NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Sunday the declaration of "interim capability" at the alliance's summit in Chicago is a first step toward a goal of establishing full coverage of Europe by 2018. A final stage is planned for 2022 that would also provide coverage of the United States from Europe.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!u&gt;Europe / Eurasia" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57438103/nato-declares-european-missile-shield-up-and-running/" target="_self">CBS News</a> reports NATO says that its European missile shield is up and running with a basic capability to shoot down incoming missiles.  NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Sunday the declaration of "interim capability" at the alliance's summit in Chicago is a first step toward a goal of establishing full coverage of Europe by 2018.  A final stage is planned for 2022 that would also provide coverage of the United States from Europe.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/ibmQcqfXE7k" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Syrian unrest sparks gun battles in Lebanon</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/syrian-unrest-sparks-gun-battles-in-lebanon.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/syrian-unrest-sparks-gun-battles-in-lebanon.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168eba74a69970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T08:24:43-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T08:24:43-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: The New York Times reports gun battles between Lebanese factions supporting and opposing the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad spread to Beirut on Monday in the most serious outbreak of violence in Lebanon since Syria’s uprising began, leaving several people dead and the country more tense than ever in its effort to avoid the fray next door. The fighting overnight in Beirut resulted in the expulsion of a small pro-Syrian faction, the Arab Movement Party, from a largely Sunni Muslim neighborhood in the southern part of the city. The quarter’s streets were littered with burned cars and trash...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!w&gt;Middle East / Northern Africa" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Syria" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/world/middleeast/syrian-unrest-sparks-gun-battles-in-lebanon.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_self">New York Times</a> reports gun battles between Lebanese factions supporting and opposing the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad spread to Beirut on Monday in the most serious outbreak of violence in Lebanon since Syria’s uprising began, leaving several people dead and the country more tense than ever in its effort to avoid the fray next door.  The fighting overnight in Beirut resulted in the expulsion of a small pro-Syrian faction, the Arab Movement Party, from a largely Sunni Muslim neighborhood in the southern part of the city.  The quarter’s streets were littered with burned cars and trash containers, but mostly calm after the military intervened.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/95GZLyTCYFo" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>$600 billion budget cuts not on the radar at Pentagon</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/600-billion-budget-cuts-not-on-the-radar-at-pentagon.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/600-billion-budget-cuts-not-on-the-radar-at-pentagon.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168eba7466c970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T08:22:12-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T08:22:12-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: The Washington Times reports military planners are under strict orders not to devise scenarios for meeting the demands of so-called “sequestration,” the automatic spending cuts slated to begin in January, because such paperwork, if leaked, would tell Congress there might be a way to deal with such drastic cuts. “The department is not currently planning for sequestration,” says Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Melinda Morgan, a Pentagon spokeswoman. Defense sources say the armed services have talked of the dire consequences of sequestration, which would require deeper troop cuts and missions left undone. But they are not creating studies that would...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!b&gt;Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!c&gt;Executive Branch" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/20/how-to-cut-600b-not-on-the-radar-at-pentagon/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS" target="_self">Washington Times</a> reports military planners are under strict orders not to devise scenarios for meeting the demands of so-called “sequestration,” the automatic spending cuts slated to begin in January, because such paperwork, if leaked, would tell Congress there might be a way to deal with such drastic cuts.  “The department is not currently planning for sequestration,” says Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Melinda Morgan, a Pentagon spokeswoman.  Defense sources say the armed services have talked of the dire consequences of sequestration, which would require deeper troop cuts and missions left undone.  But they are not creating studies that would spell out specific reductions in weapons or programs for fear it sends a signal that such downsizing is doable.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/Ezy_5y6bLAA" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>US ambassador: NATO has no plans for military intervention in Syria</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/us-ambassador-nato-has-no-plans-for-military-intervention-in-syria.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/us-ambassador-nato-has-no-plans-for-military-intervention-in-syria.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016766a55d95970b</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T08:17:21-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T08:17:21-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: CNN reports the United States ambassador to NATO says the alliance has no plans for military intervention in the Syrian crisis, as reports of deaths mount by the dozens and diplomatic efforts have yet to stymie the bloodshed. Ivo Daalder told reporters late Sunday there is "no planning going on that's related to a NATO role in Syria." "As it relates to NATO planning, a NATO ally has to come forward and request that type of planning. So that's a circumstance that hasn't taken place," the ambassador said. "We'd obviously take any requests of that nature seriously if it...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Syria" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/21/world/meast/syria-unrest/index.html?eref=rss_world&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_world+%28RSS%3A+World%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_self">CNN</a> reports the United States ambassador to NATO says the alliance has no plans for military intervention in the Syrian crisis, as reports of deaths mount by the dozens and diplomatic efforts have yet to stymie the bloodshed.  Ivo Daalder told reporters late Sunday there is "no planning going on that's related to a NATO role in Syria."  "As it relates to NATO planning, a NATO ally has to come forward and request that type of planning. So that's a circumstance that hasn't taken place," the ambassador said.  "We'd obviously take any requests of that nature seriously if it were to be made."</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/sxRUZJirAdY" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>UN nuclear chief in Iran on key mission</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/un-nuclear-chief-in-iran-on-key-mission.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/un-nuclear-chief-in-iran-on-key-mission.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e55369665088340168eba73c64970c</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T08:13:48-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T08:13:48-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: The Miami Herald reports the head of the UN nuclear agency arrived Monday in Tehran on a key mission that could lead to the resumption of probes by the watchdog on whether Iran has secretly worked on an atomic weapon. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Yukiya Amano and his two aides were quickly whisked away after landing at the Tehran airport before dawn Monday. They are to meet Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, as well as Iran's foreign minister and other officials later in the day. The visit is focused on getting Iran to agree to terms...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Iran" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Nuclear Weapons " />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: The <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/05/20/2808778/un-nuclear-agency-chief-heads.html" target="_self">Miami Herald</a> reports the head of the UN nuclear agency arrived Monday in Tehran on a key mission that could lead to the resumption of probes by the watchdog on whether Iran has secretly worked on an atomic weapon.  International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Yukiya Amano and his two aides were quickly whisked away after landing at the Tehran airport before dawn Monday. They are to meet Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, as well as Iran's foreign minister and other officials later in the day.  The visit is focused on getting Iran to agree to terms that will allow IAEA probes of suspect Iranian sites, including the Parchin military complex where the agency had reported suspicious activities in the past.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/U-PMh7eu4UQ" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>NATO chief insists no rush to exits in Afghanistan</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/nato-chief-insists-no-rush-to-exits-in-afghanistan.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/nato-chief-insists-no-rush-to-exits-in-afghanistan.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305b18ca9970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T08:10:51-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T08:10:51-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: The Washington Times reports the United States and NATO leaders insist the Afghanistan fighting coalition will remain whole despite France’s plans to yank combat troops out early, but leaders wary of plummeting public support for the war are using an alliance summit Sunday to show they want to move quickly away from the front lines. “There will be no rush for the exits,” NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said. “Our goal, our strategy, our timetable remain unchanged.” With a global economic crisis and waning public support for the war in the backdrop, world leaders were opening the NATO summit...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!j&gt;Politics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!q&gt;Afghanistan / Pakistan" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!u&gt;Europe / Eurasia" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: The <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/20/nato-chief-insists-no-rush-exits-afghanistan/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS" target="_self">Washington Times</a> reports the United States and NATO leaders insist the Afghanistan fighting coalition will remain whole despite France’s plans to yank combat troops out early, but leaders wary of plummeting public support for the war are using an alliance summit Sunday to show they want to move quickly away from the front lines.  “There will be no rush for the exits,” NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said. “Our goal, our strategy, our timetable remain unchanged.”  With a global economic crisis and waning public support for the war in the backdrop, world leaders were opening the NATO summit to tackle Afghanistan’s post-conflict future — from funding for security forces to upcoming elections.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/BtuNC2hXYXA" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>NATO takes up Obama timetable to end Afghanistan War by 2014</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/nato-takes-up-obama-timetable-to-end-afghanistan-war-by-2014.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/nato-takes-up-obama-timetable-to-end-afghanistan-war-by-2014.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305b185dc970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T08:04:07-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T08:04:07-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: CNN reports NATO countries are expected to sign off Monday on President Barack Obama's exit strategy from Afghanistan that calls for an end to combat operations next year and the withdrawal of troops by the end of 2014. Against a backdrop of massive demonstrations that saw violent clashes between protesters and police, NATO and world leaders gathered at the summit in Chicago to sketch out the end of an unpopular war and figure out how to pay for shoring up Afghanistan's security forces. Obama made clear Sunday as the summit opened that he expects the NATO nations and their...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!i&gt;Military" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ja&gt;Diplomacy / Foreign Assistance" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!q&gt;Afghanistan / Pakistan" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/21/us/nato-summit/index.html?eref=rss_world&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_world+%28RSS%3A+World%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_self">CNN</a> reports NATO countries are expected to sign off Monday on President Barack Obama's exit strategy from Afghanistan that calls for an end to combat operations next year and the withdrawal of troops by the end of 2014.  Against a backdrop of massive demonstrations that saw violent clashes between protesters and police, NATO and world leaders gathered at the summit in Chicago to sketch out the end of an unpopular war and figure out how to pay for shoring up Afghanistan's security forces.  Obama made clear Sunday as the summit opened that he expects the NATO nations and their strategic partners to agree to the withdrawal plan, while assuring Afghan President Hamid Karzai that the twenty-eight-nation alliance would not abandon the country.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/PqjgLuwONWg" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Attacks in Yemen raise concerns about al-Qaeda affiliate</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/attacks-in-yemen-raise-concerns-about-al-qaeda-affiliate.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/2012/05/attacks-in-yemen-raise-concerns-about-al-qaeda-affiliate.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e5536966508834016305b182a7970d</id>
        <published>2012-05-21T08:00:30-04:00</published>
        <updated>2012-05-21T08:00:30-04:00</updated>
        <summary>05/21/12: The New York Times reports a convulsion of violence seized Yemen with gunmen opening fire on American Coast Guard instructors at a Red Sea port and a suicide bomber wearing an army uniform killing scores in an attack on a military parade drill in the capital, Sanaa. The attacks raised fresh concerns about the activities of an al-Qaeda affiliate in the poverty-stricken land that has endured months of protest and insurgency since the first stirrings of the broader Arab revolt last year. The attack on three United States Coast Guard trainers in the port city of Hodeida happened on...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Georgetown CNSL</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!ia&gt;Terrorism / Counterterrorism" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="&lt;!w&gt;Middle East / Northern Africa" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.securitylawbrief.com/main/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>05/21/12: The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/world/middleeast/suicide-attack-in-yemen.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_self">New York Times</a> reports a convulsion of violence seized Yemen with gunmen opening fire on American Coast Guard instructors at a Red Sea port and a suicide bomber wearing an army uniform killing scores in an attack on a military parade drill in the capital, Sanaa.  The attacks raised fresh concerns about the activities of an al-Qaeda affiliate in the poverty-stricken land that has endured months of protest and insurgency since the first stirrings of the broader Arab revolt last year.  The attack on three United States Coast Guard trainers in the port city of Hodeida happened on Sunday when unidentified militants in a car pulled alongside the Americans’ vehicle and sprayed it with what was described as machine-gun fire.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GeorgetownSecurityBrief/~4/0-S289C8ShQ" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    </entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->

