The Future

Geoge Soros Says There Will Be A "Managed Decline" Of The U.S. Dollar

2009-11-01T09:15:00.002-05:00

What is about to happen to the U.S. dollar? Well, it has been heading down for quite some time now, but now people are wondering what is going to happen next. Is it going to rebound? Is it going to continue to lose its place as the reserve currency of the world. Will the rampant spending of the U.S. government cause it to collapse? Well, in the excellent video by Jesse Woodrow below, international financier George Soros says that there will be a "managed decline" of the U.S. dollar? Considering how many times George Soros has been right about these things in the past, I think it is wise to listen to what he is saying. The truth is that he has inside connections and his inside knowledge has made him a TON of money in the past.....

Is Barack Obama About To Sign A Treaty That Says A World Government Is Going To Be Created?

2009-10-19T19:16:00.003-04:00

This upcoming December, U.S. President Barack Obama is scheduled to sign a treaty on climate change in Copenhagen, Denmark. The former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher says that he has read the treaty and that it explicitly says that a world government is going to be created. Is Barack Obama about to blatantly violate the U.S. Constitution by signing a document that gives up U.S. sovereignty without any debate or input from the people of the United States?

For a long time the global elite have viewed the threat of "global warming" as a way to get all the nations of the world to agree to increased "global governance". This new treaty takes this wacky global environmental agenda to frightening new levels.

On October 14th, Lord Christopher Monckton gave a presentation at Bethel College in St. Paul, Minnesota during which he issued a dire warning regarding this "United Nations Climate Change Treaty". An excerpt of a portion of his remarks as reported by Canada Free Press is posted below. Remember, he is a former member of the Thatcher administration in the U.K. Monckton is absolutely convinced from his reading of this treaty that it says that a world government will be created.....

At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.

I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfaction of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.

Video of Lord Monckton making these remarks is posted below.....

The truth is that the majority of the American people do NOT want to be under any kind of world government, but it seems as though the United Nations, the global warming wackos and Barack Obama are determined to railroad all of us towards that goal.

Please get Lord Monckton's warning out to as many people as you can. The Copenhagen Treaty is NOT acceptable and any move towards a world government is NOT acceptable. There is still a couple of months until December so hopefully this treaty can still be stopped.

Extremely Invasive Body Scanners Being Installed At All Major U.S. Airports

2009-10-04T17:15:00.012-04:00

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has formally announced that it plans to install 150 extremely invasive body scanning machines for primary security screenings at airports across the United States. These extremely invasive scanners reveal strikingly graphic images of the exposed bodies of airline passengers, even including intimate medical details like colostomy bags or evidence of mastectomy.

In fact, the scanners are so accurate that some analysts claim that they produce better quality images of your exposed body than a magazine photograph would.

Keep in mind that these body scanners are going to be used as the "primary" security screening method at airports across the United States.

The alternative will be to have a security officer take you to the side and perform a "pat down", which many airline passengers are very uncomfortable with as well.

We were considering putting up a photo of what these "body scans" look like, but we decided not to because these body scans actually do border on obscenity.

The reality is that these "body scans" are the closest thing you can get to viewing a person's exposed body without actually seeing their skin.

Security officials in Australia where they have installed similar body scanning machines confess that these machines DO show people's exposed bodies.

Cheryl Johnson, the general manager of the Office of Transport Security in Australia, freely confessed the following about these intrusive scanners: "It will show the private parts of people, but what we've decided is that we're not going to blur those out, because it severely limits the detection capabilities."

The TSA insists that there will be measure in place to prevent security workers from gawking at the exposed bodies of passengers all day long, but the truth is that there are no laws or regulations that limit how the TSA uses these body scanners, only policies they choose to adopt. Any policy that they "choose to adopt" can be quickly discarded later.

A decade or two ago, even the most bizarre science fiction writers would not have dreamed of a world where security officers got to examine your exposed body before you could get on an airplane.

But it's happening.

The future is now, and it is not very private.

Death Bonds: Wall Street's Insidious Plan To Make Billions Off Of The Death Of Americans

2009-09-23T19:44:00.003-04:00

Wall Street has come up with new financial instruments called "life settlements" that will pay money to investors when people die. Critics are calling these new life insurance instruments "death bonds", because the quicker the insured people die, the more money the investors make. To these critics, it seems very unsavory that a catastrophic event, such as a flu pandemic that kills millions of Americans, could suddenly put billions of dollars into the pockets of investors.

Financial analysts have blamed much of the financial meltdown of the past year on the failure of the exotic financial investments that Wall Street has dreamed up over the past decade. But that isn't stopping Wall Street from coming up with even more bizarre financial instruments.

So just how would Wall Street investors make billions off of the deaths of ordinary Americans? The New York Times recently described exactly how these new financial instruments will work.....

The bankers plan to buy “life settlements,” life insurance policies that ill and elderly people sell for cash — $400,000 for a $1 million policy, say, depending on the life expectancy of the insured person. Then they plan to “securitize” these policies, in Wall Street jargon, by packaging hundreds or thousands together into bonds. They will then resell those bonds to investors, like big pension funds, who will receive the payouts when people with the insurance die.

The frightening thing is that these financial instruments give investors an incentive to see the policyholders die as quickly as possible. The New York Times described it this way.....

The earlier the policyholder dies, the bigger the return — though if people live longer than expected, investors could get poor returns or even lose money.

Do you understand what this is saying?

It can basically be boiled down to this statement:

The faster people die, the more money that the investors will make.

Do you find that disturbing at all?

These kind of financial instruments set up a very disturbing scenario. If millions of Americans were to suddenly die from the swine flu or from the bird flu or for some other reason, that could result in billions of dollars in profit for Wall Street investors.

Are you starting to get the picture?

That is why these financial instruments are being called "death bonds".

What kind of sick investors would hope for the early death of Americans so that they can make a huge profit?

Some are criticizing the timing of these new financial instruments considering the fact that public health authorities keep on declaring that we are on the edge of a major swine flu pandemic.

Would these "death bonds" give Wall Street investors the desire to see the swine flu take as many lives as possible?

The truth is that this kind of financial instrument should be made illegal. Nobody should be making huge profits off of the premature deaths of Americans.

But these days it seems as though some on Wall Street are willing to make a buck any way they can. Even if it means that people have to die prematurely in order for that to happen.

Why It Was Incredibly Stupid Not To Listen To Ron Paul

2009-09-07T12:54:00.006-04:00

As unemployment skyrockets, government debt soars and a record number of U.S. banks fail, many are now starting to realize that it was incredibly stupid not to listen to Ron Paul. You see, for decades Americans have been enjoying the fruits of the biggest debt party in history, but now the day of reckoning has come, and the foolishness of having a constantly inflating currency backed up by absolutely nothing is becoming crystal clear.

The devastating economic crisis of the past year caught many Americans by complete surprise, but the truth is that sound money conservatives such as Ron Paul have been warning that this disaster would come for decades. Just as it is true that an individual cannot borrow increasing amounts of money indefinitely without getting into very serious trouble, the reality is that the U.S. government cannot borrow larger and larger amounts of money indefinitely without it causing a complete economic disaster.

Just consider the U.S. national debt chart below. It shows the rapid growth of the U.S. national debt over the decades. But what it does not show is what has happened this past year. Because of the economic collapse and all of the bailouts, the national debt of the U.S. federal government has absolutely exploded. The U.S. government has been spending money so fast and in so many different ways that nobody is quite sure exactly what the national debt is at now. The more conservative estimates place it around 11 trillion dollars, while other estimates place it much, much higher than that.

So what is the answer that the Obama administration has given us to this massive debt problem?

Borrow and spend more money of course!

The Obama administration insists that this injection of money into the economy has fixed it.

That is kind of like going out and maxing out all of your credit cards and having to go ask your uncle for a loan, and then saying that you are rich because he loaned you some money!

Nobody ever fixed their credit card problems by putting more money on their credit cards. Indeed, it only makes the problem worse.

In the same way, by borrowing money even more rapidly, the U.S. government may have put off economic problems for a time, but by doing this they are making the ultimate day of reckoning even worse.

The truth is that all of this government borrowing and spending is going to wreck the U.S. dollar.

It is impossible to flood the money supply with liquidity without causing rampant inflation, but that is exactly what is in the process of happening.

Take a look at the chart below. It is a chart of the growth of the U.S. money supply. Since the 80s the money supply has been moving upward rapidly, but pay particular attention to the very end of the chart. That is this year. The money supply is absolutely skyrocketing.....

So what happens when you have much more money for the same amount of goods and services?

Inflation.

Now it hasn't quite kicked in big time yet. Many Americans are noticing that prices have gone up here and there, but eventually the type of inflation that is going to kick in is going to be mind blowing.

And it will affect everyone. You see, inflation is like a tax on everyone and everything. When you go to the store and a loaf of bread costs ten dollars, will you be able to buy as much?

No, of course not.

Your money will be worth less.

All of the hard work you put in to scrape together some money will have been devalued.

Your "wealth" will not be worth as much as it was before.

But even in the midst of all of this government spending and the rapid expansion of the money supply, hundreds of thousands of Americans are still losing their jobs every month, and U.S. banks are failing at a record clip. The chart below shows U.S. bank failures during the past few years.....

So what about 2009?

Well, CNN is reporting that 89 banks have failed so far in 2009.

We still have about a third of the year to go.

So just imagine what the chart above will look like at the end of this year.

This is a total economic meltdown folks.

We should have listened to Ron Paul.

But instead the American people were stupid and kept electing politicians who piled up a debt that their children and grandchildren would never, ever be able to repay.

The "wealthiest nation on earth" has now become the biggest debtor on the face of the earth.

It didn't have to be this way.

We could have listened to Ron Paul.

But we didn't.

U.S. Government Spends $16 Million To Promote The Swine Flu Vaccine

2009-08-27T19:03:00.002-04:00

As the backlash against the coming swine flu vaccine continues to grow, the U.S. government has committed 16 million taxpayer dollars to promote the swine flu vaccine to the American people. Those willing to be test subjects for the experimental swine flu vaccine are being paid cash at clinics around the country, and government officials plan a full-court press in the weeks ahead to try to convince the American people that the swine flu vaccine is safe and that everyone needs to take it.

Rather than take the time to fully test the swine flu vaccine properly, U.S. health authorities are charging ahead like the world is about to end.

It isn't like people are dropping dead from the swine flu all over the place. But instead of proceeding in a cautious manner, health officials are eagerly testing the swine flu vaccine wherever they can find willing volunteers.

In fact, they are paying good money to many of these volunteers.

Early reports had indicated that participants in swine flu trials around the U.S. were being paid fifty dollars to participate, but it looks like the price may have gone up substantially - at least in California. One ad on Craigslist is offering between 300 and 475 dollars to those willing to participate.

That may sound tempting to many people, but before anyone jumps at that opportunity perhaps they should remember how many people got seriously ill or even died from the 1976 swine flu vaccine.

The CDC's headquarters in Atlanta is even selling a stuffed swine flu toy in its gift shop. The fuzzy pink toy sells for 7.95 and it reportedly comes with an information booklet about the H1N1 virus.

But the U.S. government's main thrust in promoting the swine flu vaccine will come through the media. There is a growing awareness in government circles that a growing percentage of the American population simply does not plan to take the vaccine.

In a recent edition of the San Francisco Chronicle, Kris Sheedy, a communications director with the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, is quoted as telling reporters gathered at the CDC the following:

"Many parents (in focus groups) expressed a lot of concerns about 2009 H1N1 vaccine. Those concerns were centered around the fact that it was new and it was being developed quickly."

In particular, Sheedy recognized that many American parents are very concerned about injecting their children with an experimental vaccine that was rushed into production:

"There were comments such as 'this is new and I don't want my child to be a guinea pig.' "

But whether these concerns are legitimate or not, health "authorities" are already invading the airwaves with the message that if Americans do not take this vaccine that there is going to be a total health nightmare in this country.

Dr. Nancy Snyderman, billed as a "medical expert" at NBC News, is hyping this message to ridiculous lengths. Just check out the video below. The most shocking moment is at the very end of the video where she raises her voice and barks at viewers to "get your damn vaccine".....

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

So is all of this swine flu vaccine propaganda working on you?

Are you going to rush out and let them inject you with an experimental vaccine that is loaded with ingredients that you don't even know about?

The reality is that back in 1976 only one known person died from the swine flu, while large numbers of people were crippled or even died from the swine flu vaccine.

Are you certain that we will not see a repeat of that?

The Shocking March 2009 U.N. Population Control Policy Brief

2009-08-17T19:07:00.004-04:00

Most people have no idea that one of the key goals of the United Nations is population control. In fact, an incredibly shocking U.N. population division policy brief from March 2009 has been uncovered that not only discusses the need for population control, but also asks how fertility decline in the least developed countries can be accelerated.

Seriously.

You can read this March 2009 U.N. document right here (but be warned that it is a PDF document, so you will need a PDF viewer to read it):

http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/UNPD_policybriefs/UNPD_policy_brief1.pdf

The policy report begins with this stunning question:

What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?

So who exactly are the least developed countries?

Well, apparently they aren't places that have a lot of white people. The report defines the "less developed regions" this way:

For purposes of this brief, the less developed regions include all the countries and areas of the world except Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, the United States of America and all countries in Europe.

So apparently one of the goals of the report is to eliminate as many black and brown babies as possible. Supposedly the authors of the report feel that the white population around the world doesn't need as much eliminating.

So how does the report recommend that fertility rates be lowered in the developing nations?

"Family planning" of course.

In other words, the women in those nations need to be taught that getting pregnant is to be avoided and that having abortions is a good thing.

The following is just a portion of the report's discussion about family planning:

Lack of access to family planning and, in particular, to modern methods of contraception is a major cause of the persistence of high fertility as indicated by the high levels of unmet need for family planning prevalent in most least developed countries having the requisite data.

So what is behind all of this?

Well, the reality is that the global elite is absolutely obsessed with population control. They believe that the earth is massively overpopulated, and that all of these excess people are ruining the environment.

Even Barack Obama's number one science advisor, John P. Holdren, feels this way.

In 1977, Holdren co-authored a textbook entitled "Ecoscience" where he advocated population control measures that are so extreme that it is hard to believe that he is not clinically insane.

The following are some examples of what has been found in that textbook.....

On pages 787 and 788, the book advocates the mass sterilization of humanity by putting drugs into the food and water supply:

“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”

On pages 786 and 787, the authors discuss the benefits of the involuntary sterilization of women after their second or third child:

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

On page 838, the authors of the book reveal that they see nothing wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size:

“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”

On pages 942 and 943 of the book, the authors call for the creation of a “planetary regime” that would control the global economy and enforce population control measures:

Toward a Planetary Regime

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

Well, it looks like Holdren's dream of a planetary regime that controls the population growth of the planet is closer today than it ever has been.

It is absolutely immoral for the U.N. to ask how they can accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries. Please use this information to alert your family and friends to the horrific eugenics agenda of the global elite.

Obamacare Nightmare: No Wonder Town Hall Protesters Are So Upset

2009-08-12T19:13:00.003-04:00

As congressional leaders refer to the recent town hall protesters around the nation as "Nazis", "astroturf" and "racists", the reality is that it is some Democrats who are among the ones most strongly speaking out against Obamacare.

In particular, one article really got our attention today. On Salon.com, Camille Paglia (who voted for Obama) posted a startlingly honest article entitled "Obama's Healthcare Horror". In it, she really detailed the health care nightmare that the Obama administration is in the process of creating.

She says that she still supports Obama, but that Obama "is promoting the most colossal, brazen bait-and-switch operation since the Bush administration snookered the country into invading Iraq with apocalyptic visions of mushroom clouds over American cities."

Wow!

So what is she so concerned about?

Well, the reality is that there is not just one bill to focus on yet. There are actually five bills floating around Congress, but most of them have very similar provisions.

It is what all of those bills have in common that is seriously upsetting bloggers such as Paglia, but also a large percentage of the American population. The following are just a few of the things about Obamacare that have got a lot of Americans really upset.....

*Obama keeps assuring us that you can keep your doctor. But as Paglia points out, what if your current doctor "is not the one appointed by the new government medical boards for ruling on my access to tests and specialists?"

*Obama keeps assuring us that you can keep your current insurance. But what is your current insurer goes out of business because they can't compete with the new government-backed alternative?

*Obama keeps assuring us that there will be no rationing of health care, but the reality is that almost everywhere you find nationalized health care around the world, you find substantial rationing.

*So if there is rationing, who decides who gets care and who doesn't? Well, the government of course. So government bureaucrats could decide if you get to live or you get to die. Well, yes.

*Why is there such a massive rush to pass a health care bill? Why not take the time to present the issues to the American people in an orderly manner? Is this going to be yet another bill that members of Congress pass without reading it?

*The bureaucracy required to run Obamacare would be a nightmare beyond belief and it would quickly send federal deficits into the stratosphere.

*Obamacare will FORCE you to get health insurance. If you do not get health insurance you will be subjected to very heavy fines.

The truth is that you really can't see what a nightmare these bills are until you start to read them. Once you do take a look at what is inside these bills it is enough to get your blood boiling.

The following is one anonymous analysis that has been floating around the Internet of one of the health care bills currently in Congress:

-----

Hidden in the over 1,000 pages of Obama's dictatorial health plan...

Pg 22 of the HC Bill MANDATES the Government will audit books of ALL EMPLOYERS WHO SELF-INSURE!!

Pg 30 Sec 123 of HC bill - THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE which decides what treatments & benefits you get.

Pg 354 Sec 1177 - Govt WILL RESTRICT ENROLLMENT of Special Needs people.

Pg 42 of HC Bill - The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your HC Benefits for you.

PG 50 Section 152 in HC bill - HC WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALL NON-US CITIZENS, illegal or otherwise.

Pg 170 Lines 1-3 HC Bill- ALL NON-RESIDENT ALIENS will be exempt from individual taxes. (Resident Americans will pay)

Pg 58 HC Bill - Govt will have real-time access to individuals finances & a National ID Healthcard will be issued.

Pg 59 HC Bill lines 21-24 Govt will have direct access to your bank accounts for electronic funds transfer, no choice.

Pg 72 Lines 8-14 Govt is creating an HC EXCHANGE to bring private HC plans under Govt control.

PG 84 Sec 203 HC bill - Govt mandates ALL benefit pkgs for private HC plans in the Exchange.

PG 85 Line 7 HC Bill - Specs. for of Benefit Levels for Plans.

Pg 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18 The Govt will use groups i.e., ACORN & Americorps to sign up individuals for Govt HC plan.

pg 124 Lines 24-25 HC No company can sue Government on price fixing. No "judicial review" against Government Monopoly.

pg 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill -DOCTORS/ AMA - The Govt will tell you what your salary will be TAX.

Pg 145 Line 15-17 All Employers MUST auto enroll employees into public option plan. NO CHOICE

Pg 126 Lines 22-25 Employers MUST pay for HC for part time employees AND their families.

Pg 149 Lines 16-24 ANY Employer with payroll 400k & above, who does not provide public option, pays 8% tax on all payroll.

pg 150 Lines 9-13 Businesses with payroll btw 251k & 400k who doesn't provide public option pays 2-6% tax on all payroll.

Pg 167 Lines 18-23 ANY individual who doesn't have acceptable HC according to the Govt will be taxed 2.5% of income.

Pg 195 HC Bill -officers & employees of HC Admin (GOVT) will have access to ALL Americans finances & personal records.

PG 203 Line 14-15 HC - "The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax".

And there's even more astonishing Marxist domination and control...

Pg 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill- Govt WILL REDUCE PHYSICIAN SERVICES for Medicaid Seniors, and low income people.

Pg 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill - Doctors, doesn't matter what specialty you have, you'll all be paid the same

PG 425 Lines 4-12 Govt mandates Advance Care Planning Consultations. (seniors)

Pg 425 Lines 17-19 Govt will instruct & consult regarding living wills, durable powers of atty. Mandatory!

PG 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3 Govt provides approved list of end of life resources, guiding you in death.

PG 427 Lines 15-24 Govt mandates program for orders for end of life. The Govt has a say in how your life ends

Pg 429 Lines 1-9 An "adv. care planning consult" will be used frequently as patients health deteriorates.

PG 429 Lines 10-12 "adv. care consultation" may include an ORDER FOR END OF LIFE plans. AN "ORDER" from the GOVERNMENT on when your life ends.

Pg 429 Lines 13-25 - The govt will specify which Doctors can write an end of life order.

PG 430 Lines 11-15 The Govt will decide what level of treatment you will have at end of life.

-----

By pushing forward proposals such as these, the Democrats are infuriating a large portion of the American people. The American people were already disgusted with the Republicans after 8 years of George W. Bush, and now they are also furious at the Democrats.

The videos below of town hall meetings from all over the nation show that the American people are getting angrier at both political parties than we have ever seen before in our lifetimes.....

#1) Tampa, Florida

#2) Elkhart County, Indiana

#3) Detroit

#4) Austin, Texas

#5) Philadelphia

#6) Arkansas

#7) St. Louis

#8) Romulus, Michigan

#9) Denver

#10) Mehville, Missouri

#11) Troy, Michigan

#12) Maryland

What is even worse is that Barack Obama is actually asking citizens to inform him about anything "fishy" that they see or hear from those who would dare oppose Obamacare.

That is a huge mistake.

Instead of reaching out and trying to reason with the American people, the Democrats are calling them names and asking their supporters to inform on their fellow citizens.

Those types of tactics will only make middle America even angrier. Instead of coming together to try to find some solutions to the health care mess that we are in, America is quickly being torn apart.

Russian Subs Patrolling Just Off The East Coast Of The United States - Will They Attack America Someday?

2009-08-05T19:12:00.003-04:00

Most Americans do not realize that relations between the United States and Russia have taken a decided turn for the worse. Things certainly didn't get any better recently when the U.S. military discovered that two Russian nuclear submarines were patrolling off the east coast of the United States.

According to reports, two Akula class nuclear-powered submarines were lurking in international waters just 200 miles of the U.S. coast.

This action by the Russians sparked a firestorm of criticism by the U.S. military.

One Russian military source brushed off any criticism: "Activities of Russian submarines in the world’s oceans outside their own waters do not violate international maritime law and are within normal practice."

According to the Times, Naval historian Norman Polmar considered the Russian move to be highly unusual: “I don’t think they’ve put two first-line nuclear subs off the US coast in about 15 years."

Russia has also recently resumed flights of strategic bombers along NATO borders. About these flights, Anatoly Nogovitsyn, Russia's deputy chief of general staff recently said this:

"This is our right -- we felt bored making circles along our internal routes."

So what does all of this mean?

It means that the Russian military is back - and in a big way.

Relations between the U.S. and the Russian/Chinese alliance are quickly souring, and the reality of a major world war is closer today than it has been in ages.

The reality is that both the Russians and the Chinese view the U.S. as their number one enemy.

They are preparing for a major attack on America someday.

Most Americans don't even realize that the U.S. military has a very difficult time tracking the newest super quiet Russian nuclear subs. They could creep up very close to our shores and we would likely never even know that they are there.

In fact, a number of prophets of God have prophesied that this is EXACTLY how the Russians will one day attack the United States.

For example, the following video contains Henry Gruver's chilling vision of Russian submarines attacking the United States with nuclear missiles:

In addition, the late Romanian prophet Dumitru Duduman was also given a vision by God of the Russians nuking cites throughout the United States:

The truth is that we should be VERY concerned about Russian submarines patrolling off the U.S. coastline. It likely won't happen right away, but if those prophets are right, someday those Russian subs will pop up in the waters just off the U.S. coast, they will launch their missiles, and the cities of America will burn within minutes.

But most Americans seem like they could care less about the future. They are too busy obsessing over the death of Michael Jackson or the latest pop culture fad.

But those who are discerning realize that Russian subs just off the coast of the U.S. is NOT a good sign. Let us just hope that we have as much time as possible before the day of judgment for America comes.

24 Hour Big Brother Surveillance Of Bad Families In The U.K.

2009-07-28T19:26:00.002-04:00

There have been many who have written how the U.K. is moving towards becoming a "Big Brother" society. But they are wrong. "Big Brother" is not coming - he is already here. Tonight in the U.K., thousands of "dysfunctional" families are being subjected to intensive 24-hour surveillance to make sure their children attend school, go to bed on time and eat proper meals.

A government that watches you 24 hours a day to make sure that you put your children to bed on time and that you give them the right meals?

How much more bizarre does it have to get?

Approximately 2,000 families have already gone through "Family Intervention Projects", but the government plans increase the scope of this program to 20,000 more families in the next two years.

Why not just watch the families?

In fact, why not just watch everyone all the time to make sure that they are doing every little thing to the government's pleasing?

But the bizarre control of families in the U.K. does not end there. If some in the U.K. government have their way, all parents will soon be forced to sign "contracts" to ensure that their children behave at school.

These contracts will be known as "Home School Agreements" and parents who do not get their children to act the correct way will be faced with huge fines.

In fact, the proposed plan envisions that "good" parents will be able to complain about other parents who fail to ensure that their children behave.

But it is not just families that are facing these draconian "Big Brother" measures. After all, this is a nation where citizens are actually being paid to spy on their neighbors.

I don't know about you, but when I hear things like that, the very worst abuses of places like East Germany and North Korea come to mind.

The reality is that the U.K. is now an extremist "Big Brother" society. If you enjoy having every minuscule detail of your life watched and controlled by the government, then perhaps it would be a great place for you to move to.

But if you value personal freedom and personal privacy, then the U.K. is one of the last places you would ever want to live.

Killer Military Robots That Feed On Dead Human Flesh?

2009-07-14T19:08:00.003-04:00

Imagine a future where killer military robots mow down extremist dissidents and feast on their dead flesh. Does that sound like the bizarre plot from a really bad science fiction movie? It's not. It is actually a very real U.S. military program.

The Pentagon has hired a Maryland company know as Robotic Technology Inc. to develop these new robots.

The official name of this new robot is "Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot", otherwise known by the acronym "EATR".

Yes, these robots will be called "EATRs".

You just can't make this stuff up.

According to the company's website, these EATRs will feed themselves by foraging whatever organic material they find around them:

"The system obtains its energy by foraging – engaging in biologically-inspired, organism-like, energy-harvesting behavior which is the equivalent of eating. It can find, ingest, and extract energy from biomass in the environment (and other organically-based energy sources), as well as use conventional and alternative fuels (such as gasoline, heavy fuel, kerosene, diesel, propane, coal, cooking oil, and solar) when suitable."

That includes human flesh.

These EATR robots will be powered by the Waste Heat Engine developed by Cyclone Power Technology. This engine uses an "external combustion chamber" which burns fuel to heat up water in a closed loop, generating electricity.

The advantage of having robots such as these is that they could refuel and operate independently for months or even years. They would be able to function in almost any environment and would require very little servicing.

But obviously there is one HUGE downside.

In fact, anyone who has seen "The Terminator" can the downside from a million miles away.

Is it REALLY a great idea to be developing futuristic killer robots that feed on dead human flesh?

Any science fiction fan will tell you that such a plan can only end very, very badly.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Abortion Is About Getting Rid Of Undesirables

2009-07-10T19:31:00.003-04:00

At times it is easy to forget how completely obsessed the global elite are with eugenics and population reduction. But an incredibly shocking and offensive quote from Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is bringing the issue of eugenics to the forefront once again.

In an interview with the New York Times, Ginsburg admitted that abortion is about getting rid of certain types of people that the elite do not want to have around:

"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of."

What in the world?

Somebody needs to ask her EXACTLY what she means by "populations that we don't want to have too many of."

Talk about offensive!

And yet the liberal media has let her slide on this one so far.....

That is because the liberal media is only owned by a handful of elitists, most of which totally agree with the eugenics agenda.

You see, the agenda of population control and of getting rid of undesirables has been around for a long, long time.

For example, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood expressed her feelings about unborn children this way:

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

A shocking statement indeed, but you can see her philosophies reflected in Planned Parenthood throughout the nation today. In fact, Planned Parenthood regularly plants their clinics in the very poorest of neighborhoods.

By doing so, they help to advance the sick eugenics agenda of the global elite.

On May 5th, Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey and several other "super wealthy" Americans gathered for a secret meeting in Manhattan. Apparently one of the most important items on the agenda of the meeting was to discuss how their combined wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population.

So why didn't we hear about this meeting in the media?

Well, the reality is that there was almost a COMPLETE blackout by the American news media of this secret gathering. They reportedly met at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and the president of Rockefeller University. The secret meeting was supposed to be so discreet that many of the billionaires’ aides were only told that they were at "security briefings".

However, some details about this clandestine meeting have emerged.

According to one major U.K. newspaper, one person who attended this meeting said that "a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat."

That same article includes some incredibly disturbing quotes about the meeting from that same anonymous source.....

"This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers."

"They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming."

In other words, the "big brains" have decided that if they don't start aborting, sterilizing and killing more of us, then we are going to have a disaster of catastrophic proportions.

Which is ridiculous of course. If the greedy global elitists were not hoarding the vast majority of the world's wealth then there would be more than enough resources for everyone.

In fact, the assets of the world's three richest men exceed the combined gross domestic products of the world's 48 poorest countries.

Think about that.

3 men have more money than 48 countries combined!

Talk about greed.

And now the global elitists have decided that they have way too many servants and they need to start "culling" the herd.

Meanwhile, more than 2.8 billion people, close to half of the world's population, live on less than the equivalent of $2 a day.

Hundreds of millions of people are barely scraping by while the global elite of the world discuss how they can keep them from reproducing.

We live in a very sick world.

"Health Care Reform" = Mandatory Health Insurance And Government Control Over Your Health Decisions

2009-07-02T19:00:00.004-04:00

The majority of Americans, and especially young Americans, seem to be very enthusiastic about the health care reforms proposed by Barack Obama and the Democrats. However, what most Americans do not realize is that "health care reform" is not going to mean free health care. Instead, it is going to mean that you are forced to buy health insurance, it is going to mean that the federal government will control your health decisions and it is even going to mean that the federal government is going to decide who lives and who dies.

Under the horrific health care bill unveiled by Democrats on Thursday, Americans who refuse to buy health insurance will be hit with heavy fines of more than $1,000. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that these draconian fines will raise around 36 billion dollars over 10 years.

So all Americans will now be forced to hand their money over to greedy health insurance companies.

But when you get sick and need surgery the health insurance company will be there for you, right?

Wrong.

Just ask anyone who has tangled with a health insurance company how horrible they can be. They will do anything to squeeze out of paying a bill if they think they can get away with it.

Government run health care also means mandatory vaccinations. The CDC is now saying that the U.S. may need 600 million doses of swine flu vaccine in order to vaccinate every man, woman and child in the United States this fall.

In the future, if your national health record shows that you have not taken the mandatory vaccines, then you will not be able to get anymore health care until you do.

But there are even more frightening health care changes that the Congress passed earlier this year.

The truth is that the Democrats inserted provisions into one of the "stimulus" bills that gave the federal government COMPLETE control over your health care under a nationalized health care plan.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, otherwise known as "the economic stimulus bill" contained almost all of the key elements of Tom Daschle's ideal nationalized health care system that he outlined in his 2008 book, Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.

In his book, Daschle wrote that doctors will have to “learn to operate less like solo practitioners” and be willing to accept mandatory government controls and guidelines.

Guess what?

That is precisely what the bill forces doctors to do.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created a brand new bureaucracy called the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology. This new government organization will monitor all medical treatments to make sure that your doctor is prescribing the exact drugs and medical treatments that the federal government believes are "appropriate" and "cost effective".

The bill also had a provision that hospitals and doctors which are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face serious penalties. The bill also says that the Secretary of Health and Human Service will be permitted to impose "more stringent measures of meaningful use over time".

The bill also radically changed the way that the health care system treats the elderly.

Currently, Medicare pays for medical treatments for the elderly that are considered to safe and effective.

That is all changing now.

Now, a cost effectiveness standard set by a Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research will apply.

The goal of this "council" is to actually slow the development and use of new medications and treatments because they are driving up medical costs.

In her recent editorial, Betsy McCaughey described Daschle's attitude towards the elderly in his book:

He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

She also goes on to describe how this new "council" would actually make choices to deny health care to elderly patients if they don't have enough "productive" years left:

The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.

Do you understand what that means?

It means that now the United States government decides who lives and who dies.

But the American people cheered on Obama and the Democrats as they passed a horrible bill that the vast majority of them did not even read.

So after reading all of this, do you still want "health care reform"? Feel free to post your opinion below.....

VA State Police: Tax Protesters And Pro-Life Activists Are Terrorists

2009-06-21T16:22:00.004-04:00

Once again, an official government report has been discovered that labels large groups of American citizens as terrorists. In this incredibly shocking report, Americans who are pro-life, in favor of gun rights or are concerned with "constitutional issues" are listed as potential terrorists right along with al-Qaeda, Hamas and the Ku Klux Klan.

The report is in the form of a slideshow presentation entitled "Terrorism Awareness and Prevention" and you can see the entire report for yourself here.

The presentation start out by examining foreign terrorist groups, but quickly transitions to pointing out the "domestic terrorists" that the Virginia state police need to be watching for.

So who are those domestic terrorists?

According to the report, the following are potential domestic terrorists.....

*Anyone who believes in gun rights

*Anyone who is pro-life

*Anyone who is concerned about "constitutional issues"

*Tax protesters

*"Anti-government groups"

*Anyone who is opposed to globalization

*Anyone who is opposed to world trade agreements

*Anyone who is opposed to U.S. military intervention around the world

*Anyone who considers themselves to be a "sovereign citizen"

*Religious "cults"

*Anyone involved in large cash transactions

The categories above are basically equated with al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hizbullah, the Ku Klux Klan and radical neo-Nazis in the report.

It would be frightening enough if this was an isolated report.

But it isn't.

This is actually just the latest in a series of government documents that lists large numbers of Americans as terrorists.

For example, earlier this year a Department of Homeland Security report got a lot of publicity for demonizing military veterans returning from Iraq or Afghanistan.

Posted below is a list of 14 characteristics of a "domestic terrorist" that were pulled right out of that stunning report.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, you just may be a domestic terrorist if.....

*you are a U.S. military veteran returning from duty in Iraq or Afghanistan

*you believe in "end times" prophecies

*you believe in state or local authority

*you are against abortion

*you are against illegal immigration

*you believe in the 2nd Amendment

*you criticize any of the free trade agreements the U.S. has made

*you are against same-sex marriage

*you believe that an economic collapse is happening

*you think that the U.S. may declare martial law someday

*you believe that the U.S. is creating detention camps

*you stockpile food, ammunition or weapons

*you believe that illegal immigrants are taking away American jobs

*you believe "New World Order" conspiracy theories

Do any of those apply to you?

If so, then the Department of Homeland Security thinks that you are a potential terrorist.

But wait, there is more.....

On February 20, 2009, the State of Missouri issued a report entitled: "MIAC Strategic Report: The Modern Militia Movement."

That report actually labeled Americans who supported presidential candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin as "dangerous" and referred to those Americans as potential terrorists.

In addition, the report targeted individuals who hold particular political ideologies as being potentially dangerous.

The report instructed police and other government officials that the following political views are "dangerous" and could signal a potential terrorist:

*Anyone opposing abortion

*Anyone opposing illegal immigration

*Anyone who believes that the New World Order is a threat

*Anyone who is against the North American Union

*Anyone who is against the income tax

*Anyone who has a negative view of the U.N.

So what is the big deal?

The big deal is what the U.S. government does with "terrorists".

American "terrorists" are instantly stripped of their citizenship under the Patriot Act and can be held indefinitely without a trial.

American "terrorists" forfeit all of their rights under the Patriot Act and can be tortured just like an "Islamic" terrorist can.

Are you ready to be treated like a member of al-Qaeda for your pro-life beliefs?

Are you ready to have all of your rights taken away because you attended a TEA party?

The truth is that if the American people do not stand up against this type of demonization, then they are going to get the tyranny that they deserve. Contact your representatives in Congress and on the state level and demand that whoever was involved in these reports needs to be fired.

For official government reports to specifically target and demonize peaceful people who have a particular political viewpoint is beyond despicable. We must work peacefully within the system to change it, or else we are going to wake up one day and find that we have completely lost the constitutional system that we once loved.

Socialism In America

2009-06-17T19:19:00.002-04:00

Now that the U.S. government has taken over or has massively bailed out dozens of the largest corporations in the United States, is it time to ask if America is headed for a future of socialism? Or perhaps we should ask this question: Is socialism in America already here?

In light of recent events, it appears that the answer is quite obvious.

You see, President Barack Obama's comprehensive new plan to regulate the financial industry would give the U.S. government vast new powers to seize key companies whose failure jeopardizes the financial system.

So essentially, the U.S. government would be able to grab any company that it wants whenever it feels like it.

Up until now, the U.S. government's authority to seize companies has been mostly limited to banks.

But after the recent actions at Chrysler and General Motors it is clear that we are in a while new ball game.

After all, who ever heard of the President of the United States firing the head of General Motors?

That is essentially what happened.

And are the American people protesting? Do they seem concerned about the future?

Hardly.

It seems that many of them will agree to just about anything if they think it will get them free money and free healthcare.

But nothing is free.

Just last week news came out that the United States government is going to take a 34 percent ownership stake in Citigroup.

In the old days that would have made headline news for weeks.

Now?

Hardly a blip.

The truth is that we do not need to debate if America is going to be socialist in the future.

America already is socialist.

Some time ago, Newsweek published an article entitled "We Are All Socialists Now". While the magazine probably just intended for that headline to stir debate and get attention, the reality is that Newsweek was completely and totally right.

The U.S. is now socialist and most Americans don't even realize it.

The truth is that the United States government is almost 40 percent of GDP already, and that number is quickly growing.

And when you add up all of the taxes that the average American pays out in one form or another, they total over 50 percent of what the average American makes.

For those of you who are a little slow at math, this is what that means.....

More than half of your money goes to the government.

How does that make you feel?

If you like that, then you will probably have no problem adjusting to socialism.

The reality is that Americans are being taxed into oblivion.

Consider the following list of the different kinds of taxes that Americans pay each year.....

Accounts Receivable Tax

Building Permit Tax

Capital Gains Tax

CDL license Tax

Cigarette Tax

Corporate Income Tax

Court Fines (indirect taxes)

Dog License Tax

Federal Income Tax

Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)

Fishing License Tax

Food License Tax

Fuel permit tax

Gasoline Tax (42 cents per gallon)

Hunting License Tax

Inheritance Tax Interest expense (tax on the money)

Inventory tax IRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax)

IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)

Liquor Tax

Local Income Tax

Luxury Taxes

Marriage License Tax

Medicare Tax

Property Tax

Real Estate Tax

Septic Permit Tax

Service Charge Taxes

Social Security Tax

Road Usage Taxes (Truckers)

Sales Taxes

Recreational Vehicle Tax

Road Toll Booth Taxes

School Tax

State Income Tax

State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)

Telephone federal excise tax

Telephone federal universal service fee tax

Telephone federal, state and local surcharge taxes

Telephone minimum usage surcharge tax

Telephone recurring and non-recurring charges tax

Telephone state and local tax

Telephone usage charge tax

Toll Bridge Taxes

Toll Tunnel Taxes

Traffic Fines (indirect taxation)

Trailer registration tax

Utility Taxes

Vehicle License Registration Tax

Vehicle Sales Tax

Watercraft registration Tax

Well Permit Tax

Workers Compensation Tax

Pretty frightening, eh?

Soon you will be able to add a bunch of "carbon taxes" to that list.

Perhaps you still have doubts if the United States is socialist.

Ask yourself this - who is the biggest "business owner" in the United States?

The government.

Who is the biggest "spender" in the United States?

The government.

Who does everyone expect to "fix" and "run" the economy?

The government.

During this latest economic crisis, the federal government of the United States has "bailed out", nationalized or has taken ownership interests in a vast array of banks, financial institutions, insurance companies and large corporations.

Does that sound like "capitalism" to you?

The truth is that a new generation of Americans has arisen that expects the government to take care of them from the cradle to the grave. They expect the government to fix all their problems and to provide them with everything that they need.

In fact, the younger an American is, the more likely they are to embrace socialism. So, this trend is not likely to reverse itself any time soon.

Is living under big government socialism the future that you envisioned for your children and grandchildren?

If not, too bad, because it is here.

Welcome to socialist America.

Holocaust Museum Shooter James Von Brunn Loved Darwin, Hated Christians

2009-06-12T18:50:00.003-04:00

The truth is finally beginning to emerge about the Holocaust Museum shooter. It has now come out that James Von Brunn not only deeply admired Charles Darwin and the theory of evolution, but that he also had a deep, seething hatred for Christians and the Bible.

According to WorldNetDaily, the following recently discovered quotes from Von Brunn illustrate how he used Darwinian theory to justify his utter contempt for Jews and Christians.....

"The New Testament was written in Greek. Paul – who believed the World was flat, that Joshua made the sun stand still, and Jehovah spoke from a burning bush – wrote one-third of it, perhaps more. The events described in the 24 Books are often contradictory, fail the time-line, defy both archaeology's and nature's immutable laws, and are suicidal if practiced. Nevertheless, the shamans bought it, taught it, and the illiterate public was coerced, brainwashed, threatened, tortured, murdered, and enthralled. … The Gospels profess that only Christians may enter Yahweh's Kingdom of Heaven. To qualify, among other demands, Christians must LOVE THEIR ENEMIES (Jews); give away their personal belongings; eschew knowledge; judge not, despise nature, abandon earthly pleasures, acknowledge that all YHWH's children are equal; and above all else worship YHWH, the jealous, wrathful, vengeful, unforgiving, genocidal, anthropomorphic tribal god (Jesus' father) created by Hebrews in their image and likeness. Omnipotent, omniscient YHWH promises Hebrews that they alone shall inherit the earth, that it is commendable to steal from Gentiles, better yet — kill them. Whereas Gentiles, if they fail to worship YHWH, are transported straight to Hell. And it is written, 'A little child shall lead them.' These dangerous, imbecilic, concepts, tenets, and teachings, often treasonous, DESTROYED the Roman Empire and drenched the soil of Europe with Aryan blood for almost 2000 years!"

"The Big Lie technique, employed by Paul to create the CHRISTIAN RELIGION, also was used to create the HOLOCAUST RELIGION … CHRISTIANITY AND THE HOLOCAUST are HOAXES."

But should we be surprised?

The truth is that whenever Darwinism and atheism triumph, it results in extreme repression of Jews and Christians.

Just think of every major atheist nation of the 20th century - the U.S.S.R., communist China, Cuba, all of communist eastern Europe, North Korea - they all persecuted Jews and Christians brutally.

But Von Brunn's ideology most closely resembles the anti-Semitic and anti-Christian "social Darwinism" of Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler.

The Nazis fully embraced the theories of Charles Darwin and sought to apply the implications of that theory to society as a whole.

In fact, there are amazing parallels to be drawn between Nazism and what we are seeing today.

The vast majority of people believe that Nazism was a far right political movement, but that assumption is completely and totally wrong.

The official title of the Nazi party under Adolf Hitler was the "National Socialist German Workers’ Party".

Please take special note of the word "Socialist" in that title.

The Nazis were socialists.

That is not right - that is far left.

The Nazis advocated very tight social and economic control by a big, powerful central government.

That is a far left philosophy - not a far right one.

Big government is always the desire of leftists.

Well, what about social issues?

When the Nazis came to power in 1933 one of the very first acts of Hitler was to legalize abortion in Germany.

By 1935, there were more than 500,000 abortions being performed in Germany each and every year.

Adolf Hitler was a huge fan of Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, and she was a big admirer of him.

How did Margaret Sanger feel about unborn children?:

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

Hitler not only advocated abortion, but he also vigorously advanced the eugenics agenda of Planned Parenthood.

Adolf Hitler said this: "The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective offspring. . . represents the most humane act of mankind."
-Mein Kampf, vol. 1, ch. 10

Hitler's obsession with eugenics resulted in the involuntary euthanasia of disabled people and the compulsory sterilization of thousands of people with mental deficiencies.

Just like the far left of today, Hitler had no respect for human life.

What about education? Were Hitler and the Nazis far right or far left?

In "The Swastika against the Cross: The Nazi War on Christianity", Bruce Walker describes how the Nazis declared an all out war against Christianity in their public schools. He documents some absolutely stunning historical facts such as the following:

-Only clergymen were permitted to teach religious classes, and those clergymen were forced to teach according to the anti-Christian instructions of the Nazi Ministry of Education.

-In the city of Wurrtemberg, when clergymen totally refused to follow Nazi teachings on religion, 700 of them were permanently banned from the classroom.

-Christian prayers were totally banned from the public classroom and crucifixes and other Christian symbols were physically removed as well.

-By 1935, the passionately anti-Christian leader of the Hitler Youth, Baldur von Shirach, issued a regulation that prohibited any child from belonging simultaneously to a Christian youth group and the Hitler Youth.

-Gradually, membership in the Hitler Youth became almost obligatory, and parents were told that their children would not get good jobs in the civil service unless they belonged to the Hitler Youth and employers were told that they should not hire children who did not belong to the Hitler Youth.

-Christian children who did not belong to the Hitler Youth or its female counterpart were routinely beaten up by young Nazi thugs.

-Boys inducted into the Hitler Youth were required to explicitly reject Christianity by disgusting oaths such as this: “German blood and Christian baptismal water are completely incompatible.”

The following is an example of a an actual Hitler Youth slogan:

“The Faith fanatics, who still to-day slide down on their knees with faces uplifted to heaven, waste their time in churchgoing and prayers, and have not yet understood that they are living on the earth and that therefore their task is of a thoroughly earthly kind. All we Hitler people can still only look with the greatest contempt on those young people who still run to their silly Evangelical or Catholic Churches in order to vent their quite superstitious religious feelings.”

The following are actual quotes from Hitler Youth training manuals:

“Christianity is a religion of slaves and fools.”

“How did Christ die? Whining at the Cross!”

“The Ten Commandments represent the lowest instincts of man.”

“Christianity is merely a cloak for Judaism.”

The Nazi tract "Gott und Volk" was widely distributed in 1941, and it describes how the Nazis envisioned their children being raised: “With parties and gifts the youth will be led painlessly from one faith to the other and will grow up without ever having heard of the Sermon on the Mount or the Golden Rule, to say nothing of the Ten Commandments… The education of the youth is to be confined primarily by the teacher, the officer, and the leaders of the party. The priests will die out. They have estranged the youth from the Volk. Into their places will step the leaders. Not deputies of God. But anyway the best Germans. And how shall we train our children? Thus, as though they had never heard of Christianity!”

Doesn't this philosophy sound way too familiar?

Today the ACLU and other far left organizations are rabidly trying to eliminate every shred of Christianity from the public schools of America.

So are Hitler and the Nazis closer to the Left of today or to the Right of today?

It appears that the answer is completely obvious.

The truth is that a society that teaches Darwinism and trashes Christianity is going to produce sickos like James Von Brunn.

A lot of people who read this article are not going to like that statement, but it is true.

Glenn Beck Publicly Sells Out Gun Owners, Militia Members And Other Members Of The Far Right On The Air

2009-06-04T19:50:00.004-04:00

It seems that whenever the establishment wishes to demonize a particular group, they start claiming that they are "working with al-Qaeda". This time, a warning about an "unholy alliance" between "right wing extremists" and al-Qaeda is coming from a seemingly unlikely source: Glenn Beck.

On a recent show, Glenn Beck, who is supposed to be an "arch-conservative", publicly sold out gun owners, militia members and other members of the far right on the air.

In the video below, Beck and a guest are discussing a video by a supposed al-Qaeda leader who claims that he wants to smuggle Anthrax into the U.S. and attack the government. In the video, the al-Qaeda leader also states that al-Qaeda might want to team up with "members of native U.S. white supremacist militias who hate the federal government."

First of all, such a notion is completely and utterly ridiculous. The idea of white supremacists teaming up with al-Qaeda is so bizarre and so unlikely that anyone with half a brain knows that such a thing would never happen.

But in the video below notice how Beck jumps on the idea.

Notice how he points out how he has been warning of just such a thing for a long time.

Also notice how he subtly links white supremacists with "militia groups" and those who are anti-government.....

Do you see what is going on here?

Beck is purposely demonizing the growing liberty movement in the United States.

Millions of Americans are waking up to the fact that both political parties are owned by the bankers, that our rights are being stripped from us at blinding speed, and that most of our politicians and leaders don't even give lip service to the Constitution anymore.

In fact, these days if you talk about the Constitution too much you are likely to be labeled by authorities as someone who is likely to work with al-Qaeda.

The truth is that many civil libertarians and freedom activists are becoming increasingly alarmed by the trend towards massive political repression in the United States. Political candidates and organizations that are out of favor with the establishment are now actually being labeled as "dangerous" and as "potential terrorists" in official government reports.

For example, on February 20, 2009, the State of Missouri issued a stunning report entitled: "MIAC Strategic Report: The Modern Militia Movement."

That law enforcement report labeled individuals who supported presidential candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin as "dangerous" and inferred that those individuals are potential terrorists.

In addition, people of various other ideologies were singled out as being potentially dangerous in the report.

The MIAC report instructed police and other government officials that the following political views are "dangerous" and could signal that someone is a potential terrorist:

*Anyone opposing abortion

*Anyone opposing illegal immigration

*Anyone who believes that the New World Order is a threat

*Anyone who is against the North American Union

*Anyone who is against the income tax

*Anyone who has a negative view of the U.N.

It is interesting to note that no left-leaning political ideologies or organizations were identified in the report. Neither were Islamic extremists mentioned in the report. Apparently only those who support candidates like Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin are considered to be dangerous.

These are exactly the type of tactics that were used in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia to demonize and crush political opposition. When official government reports start labeling supporters of certain political candidates as "potential terrorists" all Americans should start getting alarmed.

It doesn't matter how you feel about those candidates. For instance, you may hate what Ron Paul stands for. It doesn't matter. What does matter is that when official government reports openly attack certain political groups, we are all being attacked.

Another example of this disturbing trend towards political repression is the recent Department of Homeland Security report on "right wing extremism" that created a firestorm of controversy across America.

Why was there such an incredible uproar over that report?

Because it labeled tens of millions of Americans as "potential domestic terrorists".

Below is a list of 14 characteristics of a "domestic terrorist" that were pulled right out of this report.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, you might be a domestic terrorist if.....

*you are a U.S. military veteran returning from duty in Iraq or Afghanistan

*you believe in "end times" prophecies

*you believe in state's rights

*you are against abortion

*you are against illegal immigration

*you believe in the 2nd Amendment

*you criticize any of the free trade agreements the U.S. has made

*you are against same-sex marriage

*you believe that an economic collapse is happening

*you think that the U.S. may declare martial law someday

*you believe that the U.S. is creating detention camps

*you stockpile food, ammunition or weapons

*you believe that illegal immigrants are taking away American jobs

*you believe "New World Order" conspiracy theories

Quite a few of those apply to me, so it looks like I have made the list.

Have you made the list?

Has your own government just labeled you a potential domestic terrorist?

The truth is that when even "arch-conservatives" like Glenn Beck start warning that people who don't agree with the government might be "working with al-Qaeda", we should all get really, really nervous.

We have seen this kind of demonization and political repression happen before. Don't let it happen in the United States.

Has Nuclear War Now Become An Inevitable Part Of The Future Destiny Of Mankind?

2009-05-27T19:33:00.007-04:00

North Korea's recent nuclear test and Iran's nuclear ambitions are now causing many to wonder if we are now at the point where nuclear war has become inevitable.

Fortunately nuclear weapons have not been used in an open conflict since the end of World War II. Somehow humanity has gone over 60 years without using them. But now, as nukes get into more and more hands, are we now getting to the point where it is almost certain that somebody out there will use them?

After all, Korea is closer to war than at any point since the end of the Korean war.

North Korea’s official news agency has announced that Kim Jong Il's government will no longer abide by the 1953 armistice that ended the Korean War. Now that the armistice has been done away with, many analysts are claiming that North Korea and South Korea are now technically in a state of war.

When you consider the fact that Kim Jong Il is completely insane, the reality is that anything is possible.

Russia knows what the score is over there. The Kremlin fears that the Korean conflict could quickly go nuclear.

As North Korea threatens to fire even more "test" missiles, the world is watching what Barack Obama will do. How will he respond to this threat?

What would he do if either North Korea or South Korea attacked?

Let's hope that we don't have to find out.

But Korea is not the only place where nuclear war may break out.

Iran is getting increasingly closer to be able to produce a nuclear weapon, and Israel seems determined not to let that happen.

Many thought that the U.S. would be the one to attack Iran, but now that seems quite unlikely, and it looks like Israel is ready to take action with or without the U.S.

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is saying that if Israel does not eliminate the Iranian threat, no one will. Apparently he agrees with many analysts who are now realizing that Barack Obama plans to do absolutely nothing to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons.

So will Israel use their nuclear weapons to prevent Iran from producing their own?

Can Israel afford to let the crazed Islamic fundamentalists in Iran get nukes?

It is important to understand the mindset of these people.

For example, the Palestinians actually teach their children that no Jewish kingdom ever existed in the land of Israel, and that there never was a Jewish Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

Seriously.

What's next? Will they teach their children that the sky is pink and that the moon is made out of green cheese?

The spread of nuclear weapons threatens all of humanity.

Pakistan and India both have nukes, and the world has been openly considering what the Taliban would do with nuclear weapons if they are able to overthrow Pakistan's government.

What IF nukes got into the hands of terrorists who really wanted to use them?

The truth is that humanity has been really fortunate up to this point that nukes have not been used.

But is our good fortune about to run out?

The Future Of American Youth: Fascist Uniforms & Paramilitary Training

2009-05-19T19:37:00.003-04:00

As the domestic security apparatus continues to expand aggressively in the U.S., it is increasingly turning to America's youth to fill its ranks. It has gotten to the point where we are dressing our teens in "fascist" uniforms, teaching them hand salutes and giving the boy scouts paramilitary training.

Seriously.

First let's talk about a really disturbing article in the New York Times recently entitled: "Scouts Train to Fight Terrorists, and More".

In that article, the New York Times describes how the Boy Scouts are training thousands of young people to confront terrorism, illegal immigration and escalating border violence.

A couple of examples of "exercises" that these "Explorers" have participated in include a simulated raid on a marijuana field and taking out a disgruntled Iraq war veteran.

“Put him on his face and put a knee in his back,” a Border Patrol agent instructed a teen during one exercise that the New York Times observed. “I guarantee that he’ll shut up.”

Most of the time the "Explorers" use compressed-air guns which fire tiny plastic pellets during the training exercises, but other times they shoot real guns on a closed range.

“I like shooting them,” one participant told the New York Times. “I like the sound they make. It gets me excited.”

Are any of you who are reading this starting to get disturbed yet?

What in the world are we turning our kids into?

Just read this harrowing description of a live drill these "Explorers" were put through.....

Their hearts pounding, Explorers moved down alleys where there were hidden paper targets of people pointing guns, and made split-second decisions about when to shoot. In rescuing hostages from a bus taken over by terrorists, a baby-faced young girl screamed, “Separate your feet!” as she moved to handcuff her suspect.

We are training these kids to be enforcers in a futuristic police state.

Is this the kind of America you want to live in?

As if paramilitary training for the boy scouts was not bad enough, just check out this propaganda ad for Americorps.....

Do you find the red and khaki "uniforms" disturbing?

What about the creepy hand salutes?

One of the most insidious things about that ad is how they mixed images of Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in to make it seem so noble.

But the truth is that the government wants to train and use America's youth to help run the growing "Big Brother" police state that is growing up all around us.

Almost every week new laws are being passed that erode just a little bit more of our freedoms.

Will Americans wake up to the growing tyranny?

If you drop a frog in a pot of boiling water it will jump right out, but if you put a frog in a pot full of warm water and very slowly turn the heat up it will just sit there until it is boiled.

We are like that frog.

Our freedoms are slowly being boiled away as the heat keeps getting turned up, and we are all just sitting there. We need to tell our representatives that we want our freedoms back.

The good news is that millions of Americans are waking up and they are starting to take positive action.

Things may look bleak right now, but there are people who are offering positive solutions in the middle of this crisis.....

Sometimes it is easy to be discouraged by the direction this country is headed, but the truth is that the darker it is, the more the light can shine.

One of the favorite tactics of all tyrannical regimes (communist, fascist, etc.) is to set up youth brigades. It will be important for all of us to watch what all of these "youth programs" turn into.

Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.

Let's not forget what "youth brigades" have led to in the past.

Human Trafficking Gone Mad: Over 1 Million Child Prostitutes In India

2009-05-11T19:16:00.004-04:00

What if I told you that there are more than one million child prostitutes in India tonight?

What would you say?

Would you say that I was lying?

Would you say that I must be surely exaggerating?

Well, I am not saying it.

India's federal police are saying it.

According to CNN, India's Central Bureau of Investigation released a statement about child trafficking in which they made this sober assessment: "However, studies and surveys sponsored by the ministry of women and child development estimate that there are about three million prostitutes in the country, of which an estimated 40 percent are children."

So India's government is officially estimating that there are approximately 1.2 million child prostitutes in their country.

In 2009.

What is happening to this world?

The truth is that when you talk to most Americans about "slavery", they think of something that happened long ago that has now been abolished. However, the reality is that modern slavery is not only real, but it is rapidly growing, and today more people are enslaved around the world than ever before.

A recent report put out by the United Nations claims that most of the world is in denial about the horror of human trafficking. Instead of going away, human slavery is getting even worse and more widespread in the 21st century.

Exactly how many people are being trafficked?

The U.S. State Department says that there are 800,000 new victims each year, while the International Labor Organization claims that the number is actually about 2.5 million.

The executive director of the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, Antonio Maria Costa, had this to say about the U.N. report: "It's sick that we should even need to write a report about slavery in the 21st century."

Actress Mira Sorvino has been appointed as a U.N. goodwill ambassador to help Costa's agency fight human trafficking, and she had this to say about the human trafficking phenomenon: "Until a few years ago, I blissfully believed that slavery was a thing of the past.....Well, obviously I was terribly wrong."

According to the U.N. report, sexual exploitation accounts for 79 percent of human trafficking, while forced labor accounts for 18 percent.

So just who is being trafficked?

The report says that women are 66 percent of the victims, followed by young girls at 13 percent, men at 12 percent, and young boys at 9 percent.

One of the greatest tragedies in all of this is that a huge number of the children being enslaved around the world are being forced into the sex trade for the enjoyment of sick tourists.

According to the American Bar Association, 8.4 million children around the world are currently subjected to "forced labor, forced recruitment for armed conflict, prostitution, pornography, and other illicit activities."

And you know what makes this worse?

Sickos from the United States and Europe are fueling much of this.

The term "sex tourism" has actually become part of the English language over the past decade as thousands upon thousands of Americans and Europeans have flown to foreign countries to have sex with these child slaves.

Our world is becoming full of sickos, perverts and disgusting creeps just as 2 Timothy 3:1-4 warned us would happen in the last days before the return of Christ.....

"But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God"

The truth is that this world is rapidly falling apart. It is becoming a much darker and much more evil place with each passing day. The signs of this growing darkness are all around us.

If humanity is so "evolved" and so "advanced", then why can't they get rid of this evil?

The reality is that we can't.

Humanity is a slave to sin just like the Bible says. In fact, the Scriptures say that each one of us is a slave to sin.

There is only one way to escape this slavery to sin. If you will receive Jesus Christ into your life you can be set free from sin and will receive eternal life.

But most people will just go on thinking that they are "good" people and that the governments around the world are "good" and that we live in a "good" world.

The truth is that we do not live in a "good" world.

We live in a really, really messed up world, and I'll bet there are about a million child sex slaves in India tonight who would back me up on that point.

U.S. Air Traffic Control Computers Hacked?

2009-05-10T13:28:00.002-04:00

What would you say if I told you that U.S. air traffic control computers have been hacked several times in the past few years?

You would probably say that I was crazy.

But I am not saying it.

A government report is.

According to a new government audit, hackers broke into U.S. air traffic control computers on several occasions over the past several years.

Wow, that is frightening?

So is this the future of flight?

Having to worry if your flight plan will be hacked and you will end up flying into a mountain?

Technology does wonderful things with us, but it also brings new problems.

Hopefully hackers will never be able to do anything truly dangerous to our air traffic control systems, but it is hard to feel as confident in our air traffic control security after reading this.

H.R. 1966: Offend Someone Online - Go To Prison

2009-05-06T19:35:00.003-04:00

At a time when freedom of speech is already under attack like never before, a shocking new bill in the U.S. House of Representatives would make it a felony to offend someone online.

A felony.

Under this new law you would not just be slapped on the wrist and have to pay a fine.

You would go to big boy prison.

While most free speech activists have been watching the recent "hate crimes" bill, this much more insidious piece of legislation has received almost no notice whatsoever.

Just take a look at what H.R. 1966 actually says.....

Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

Whoa.

So if you offend someone on Facebook you could go to federal prison for two years?

Yup.

If your blog insults someone and causes them to feel bad you could go to prison for two years?

Yeppers.

If you are in a bad mood one day and you send fire off an angry tweet on Twitter that you maybe should not have you could go to prison for two years over it?

Yes indeed.

Are you starting to get the picture yet?

Talk about an attempt to chill free speech.

So if someone reads something that you have written and it makes them feel bad they can take it to the feds and have them come get you?

That is a very, very frightening thought.

The reality is that the government is increasingly trying to control even the very small details of our lives. They are even increasingly trying to control what we say and what we think.

Freedom of speech is one of the cornerstones of a free society. If we are not free to express ourselves without the fear that someone will be offended, then what freedom will we really have left?

The reality is that if we do not stand up to this, the United States of America will quickly become overrun with politically-correct "commissars" who are eager to throw anyone who disagrees with them in jail for "hate crimes" and "thought crimes".

Things are already out of control in the United Kingdom. Did you know that there are actually undercover officers in some areas of the U.K. that sit in bars and restaurants listening for anyone who might say something offensive or racist?

You may laugh, but the United States is quickly heading down that road.

The full text of H.R. 1966 is below.....

-----

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1966:

Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act (Introduced in House)
HR 1966 IH

111th CONGRESS
1st Session

H. R. 1966
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to cyberbullying.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 2, 2009

Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California (for herself, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. YARMUTH, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HARE, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. CLAY, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. COURTNEY, and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to cyberbullying.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) Four out of five of United States children aged 2 to 17 live in a home where either they or their parents access the Internet.
(2) Youth who create Internet content and use social networking sites are more likely to be targets of cyberbullying.
(3) Electronic communications provide anonymity to the perpetrator and the potential for widespread public distribution, potentially making them severely dangerous and cruel to youth.
(4) Online victimizations are associated with emotional distress and other psychological problems, including depression.
(5) Cyberbullying can cause psychological harm, including depression; negatively impact academic performance, safety, and the well-being of children in school; force children to change schools; and in some cases lead to extreme violent behavior, including murder and suicide.
(6) Sixty percent of mental health professionals who responded to the Survey of Internet Mental Health Issues report having treated at least one patient with a problematic Internet experience in the previous five years; 54 percent of these clients were 18 years of age or younger.

SEC. 3. CYBERBULLYING.

(a) In General- Chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
Sec. 881. Cyberbullying

(a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(b) As used in this section–
(1) the term ‘communication’ means the electronic transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user’s choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received; and
(2) the term `electronic means’ means any equipment dependent on electrical power to access an information service, including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages.’.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
881. Cyberbullying.’.

Is The Swine Flu Outbreak Much Worse Than They Are Telling Us?

2009-04-28T19:30:00.003-04:00

As the flu crisis continues to spread rapidly around the world there are now frightening indications that the swine flu outbreak is much worse than the mainstream media is telling us. Multiple eyewitness reports out of Mexico confirm that the real death toll there is far higher than the 152 confirmed deaths that are being reported internationally.

Comments from Mexican eyewitnesses on a BBC News website tell of a much bleaker situation in Mexico than we have been told in the mainstream media. These chilling reports should put a chill up your spine.....

*Antonio Chavez, a medical doctor from Mexico City:

I’m a specialist doctor in respiratory diseases and intensive care at the Mexican National Institute of Health. There is a severe emergency over the swine flu here. More and more patients are being admitted to the intensive care unit. Despite the heroic efforts of all staff (doctors, nurses, specialists, etc) patients continue to inevitably die. The truth is that anti-viral treatments and vaccines are not expected to have any effect, even at high doses. It is a great fear among the staff. The infection risk is very high among the doctors and health staff.

There is a sense of chaos in the other hospitals and we do not know what to do. Staff are starting to leave and many are opting to retire or apply for holidays. The truth is that mortality is even higher than what is being reported by the authorities, at least in the hospital where I work it. It is killing three to four patients daily, and it has been going on for more than three weeks. It is a shame and there is great fear here. Increasingly younger patients aged 20 to 30 years are dying before our helpless eyes and there is great sadness among health professionals here.

*Alvaro Ricardez, Oaxaca City, Oaxaca, Mexico:

In the capital of my state, Oaxaca, there is a hospital closed because of a death related to the porcine influenza. In the papers they recognise only two people dead for that cause. Many friends working in hospitals or related fields say that the situation is really bad, they are talking about 19 people dead in Oaxaca, including a doctor and a nurse. They say they got shots but they were told not to talk about the real situation. Our authorities say nothing. Life goes on as usual here.

*Migdalia Cruz, Phoenix, Arizona:

I have a sister-in-law from San Luis Potosi state in Mexico and we were told that in San Luis Potosi there have been at least 78 deaths, just in that city alone, not 68 in all of Mexico, as is being reported. Schools have been closed until 6 May in this state and in other areas in Mexico. Also, many public venues are being closed, so this makes it more deadly and dangerous than has been stated.

*Yeny Gregorio Dávila, Mexico City:

I work as a resident doctor in one of the biggest hospitals in Mexico City and sadly, the situation is far from “under control”. As a doctor, I realise that the media does not report the truth. Authorities distributed vaccines among all the medical personnel with no results, because two of my partners who worked in this hospital (interns) were killed by this new virus in less than six days even though they were vaccinated as all of us were. The official number of deaths is 20, nevertheless, the true number of victims are more than 200. I understand that we must avoid to panic, but telling the truth it might be better now to prevent and avoid more deaths.

Hopefully reports like this will get out there and will make people realize how serious this all could become.

One independent reporter has even captured stunning footage of a packed emergency room full of patients wearing masks and coughing like crazy near the U.S./Mexico border.

In the United States things are starting to become quite frightening as well. There is now a report that North Carolina officials are involuntarily isolating swine flu patients. Please note the "involuntary" part of that. Imagine if this happens all over the nation and Americans who show symptoms of the swine flu start getting ripped away from their families and sent to isolation facilities and camps.

Scary stuff.

Reports of new swine flu outbreaks are coming in almost constantly now and the World Health Organization has raised the threat level from a Phase 3 Global Outbreak to Phase 4, which has never been done before. Meanwhile, scientists are completely puzzled how such a powerful strain that combines elements of swine flu, bird flu and human flu could have appeared seemingly out of nowhere.

So is this going to be the big one?

Is this the one that is going to kill millions of people?

It is too early to tell, but here is what we do know at this hour.....

First of all, this "swine flu" is not just run of the mill swine flu. It contains elements of the following.....

*Avian flu
*Human flu
*European swine flu
*Asian swine flu

Now how in the world did an incredibly strong combination of these viruses appear seemingly out of nowhere?

Scientists are baffled.

Meanwhile this "swine flu" is popping up all over the U.S. and Mexico.

In Mexico alone, there are already over 1600 suspected cases and 152 suspected deaths from the swine flu so far. Most public events have been canceled, and millions of Mexicans are hiding indoors in an attempt to escape the swine flu.

67 cases of the swine flu have been confirmed in the United States, and the CDC says that it is too late to contain the swine flu outbreak in the United States.

In fact, some public schools in many areas all over the United States are being closed due to fear over this swine flu.

These outbreaks in the U.S. and Mexico are already causing panic reactions from other parts of the world.

EU health commissioner Andorra Vassiliou has asked Europeans to postpone nonessential travel to the United States or Mexico. In addition, China has banned the import of hog and pork products from Mexico and parts of the United States.

However, the truth is that the swine flu is now spreading all over the world. Just today new reports of swine flu cases have come in from Canada, Israel, France, New Zealand, Costa Rica and South Korea.

Google actually has a great tool that you can use to track the spread of this swine flu. You can follow the progress of the swine flu on Google maps right here.

So what can we expect to see going forward?

The next few days are going to be key.

If only a few hundred people end up dying from this swine flu that is not that big of a deal. Hundreds of people die from many different causes every day.

But if this disease starts sweeping the globe and thousands of people start dying, then that could indicate that this IS the big one.

The reality is that we have been warning of a coming flu plague for quite some time.

What is even more disturbing is the possibility that this new flu may be engineered. We recently reported on the unlabeled bird flu/human flu mixture that Baxter International "accidentally" sent out to other labs.

Why would our scientists mix these dangerous viruses together so recklessly? The CDC was mixing human flu and bird flu together as far back as 2004. This is incredibly dangerous to do. One mistake and a pandemic virus can be released that could kill millions of people.

So how many people will this "swine flu" virus kill?

Is this going to become a massive pandemic that bring the world to a standstill?

Nobody can say for sure yet, but it is getting frightening out there. Be sure to take the necessary precautions to keep your family safe.

American Torture

2009-04-20T15:15:00.002-04:00

Imagine a government that cruelly tortures thousands of prisoners endlessly for years and years and then announces to the world that nobody will ever be held accountable for the torture.

That's torture "American style".

Where else in the world can you be waterboarded an average of 6 times per day?

It has now been revealed that terror suspect Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was waterboarded 183 times in March 2003 and Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded 83 times in August 2002.

The following is how Wikipedia defines waterboarding:

Waterboarding is a form of torture that consists of immobilizing the victim on his or her back with the head inclined downwards, and then pouring water over the face and into the breathing passages. By forced suffocation and inhalation of water the subject experiences drowning and is caused to believe they are about to die.

Imagine having to go through that once.

Now imagine having to go through it 183 times in one month.

How could we treat any human being that way?

But now it is being announced that nobody will ever be held accountable for all of this torture.

Last Thursday President Barack Obama released four top secret memos from during the Bush administration that discussed the torture of terror suspects held at Guantanamo Bay and at other secret detention centers around the globe.

In a statement accompanying the release of the memos, Obama said very clearly that those who had been involved in the torture would NOT be prosecuted. Obama stated that this is a "time for reflection, not retribution."

What in the world?

No prosecution for anyone?

President Obama correctly acknowledged that this was a "dark and painful chapter in our history."

So why is nobody being held accountable?

“Nothing will be gained,” Obama said, “by spending our time and energy laying blame for the past.”

Is he serious?

Is anything gained when we put a rapist in jail?

Is anything gained when we put a serial killer behind bars?

How can he say that nothing would be gained from prosecuting those people who have committed horrific torture crimes?

The new attorney-general, Eric Holder, also stated that there will be no prosecution of CIA operatives working within the guidelines set by the Bush administration: "It would be unfair to prosecute dedicated men and women working to protect America for conduct that was sanctioned in advance by the justice department."

Unfair?

Was it unfair to prosecute the Nazis after World War II who were "just following the orders of Hitler"?

You can read the four torture memos that Obama released here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/page/torture-memos

The torture techniques described in these memos include.....

*Forced nudity

*"Walling", which is slamming a prisoner into a wall

*"Cramped confinement" which means "placement of the individual in a confined space"

*Stinging insects placed inside "a confinement box"

*Waterboarding - one of the memos actually admits that "the use of waterboarding constitutes a threat of imminent death"

*Sleep deprivation for several days

*Sleep deprivation while wearing a diaper

*The use of "stress positions" to cause "muscle fatigue"

*"Dietary manipulation"

*Facial and abdominal slapping

One of the most shocking things in these memos is that they recognized that the techniques that they were authorizing were ones that we condemned other countries for using.

However, the reality of American torture goes far beyond what was described in those four memos.

The truth is that it is documented that the torture of American prisoners around the world has been absolutely sadistic and brutal.

The following is list of some of the torture acts that U.S. military personnel committed against "terror suspects" as recorded in the executive summary of the Article 15-6 investigation of the 800th Military Police Brigade by Major General Antonio M. Taguba. A full copy of this report can be found at MSNBC.com.....

*Videotaping and photographing naked male and female detainees

*Forcibly arranging detainees in various sexually explicit positions for photographing

*Forcing detainees to remove their clothing and keeping them naked for several days at a time

*Forcing naked male detainees to wear women’s underwear

*Forcing groups of male detainees to masturbate themselves while being photographed and videotaped

*Arranging naked male detainees in a pile and then jumping on them

*Positioning a naked detainee on a MRE Box, with a sandbag on his head, and attaching wires to his fingers, toes, and penis to simulate electric torture

*Writing "I am a Rapest" (sic) on the leg of a detainee alleged to have forcibly raped a 15-year old fellow detainee, and then photographing him naked

*Placing a dog chain or strap around a naked detainee’s neck and having a female Soldier pose for a picture

*A male MP guard having sex with a female detainee

*Using military working dogs (without muzzles) to intimidate and frighten detainees, and in at least one case biting and severely injuring a detainee

*Taking photographs of dead Iraqi detainees

*Breaking chemical lights and pouring the phosphoric liquid on detainees

*Threatening detainees with a charged 9mm pistol

*Pouring cold water on naked detainees

*Beating detainees with a broom handle and a chair

*Threatening male detainees with rape

*Sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broom stick

Does that sound like sadistic torture to you?

I certainly hope so.

Don't you think that those who participated in such acts should be held accountable?

So do I.

But apparently Obama does not, so all of the torturers are going to escape punishment and will never be brought to trial.

The word "shame" is not nearly strong enough to describe this state of affairs.

Have the American people sunk so low that they are now perfectly willing to accept that their government brutally tortures people with absolutely no accountability?

You Might Be A Domestic Terrorist If.....

2009-04-16T14:43:00.005-04:00

The recent Department of Homeland Security report on "right wing extremism" has created a firestorm of controversy across the United States.

Why is there such an uproar?

Why are so many people so upset about this?

Why?

Because it labels tens of millions of Americans as "potential domestic terrorists".

You can read a copy of this sickening report for yourself here:

http://video1.washingtontimes.com/video/extremismreport.pdf

Below is a list of 14 characteristics of a "domestic terrorist" that were pulled right out of the report.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, you might be a domestic terrorist if.....

*you are a U.S. military veteran returning from duty in Iraq or Afghanistan

*you believe in "end times" prophecies

*you believe in state or local authority

*you are against abortion

*you are against illegal immigration

*you believe in the 2nd Amendment

*you criticize any of the free trade agreements the U.S. has made

*you are against same-sex marriage

*you believe that an economic collapse is happening

*you think that the U.S. may declare martial law someday

*you believe that the U.S. is creating detention camps

*you stockpile food, ammunition or weapons

*you believe that illegal immigrants are taking away American jobs

*you believe "New World Order" conspiracy theories

Quite a few of those apply to me, so it looks like I have made the list.

What about you?

Has your own government just labeled you a domestic terrorist?