<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Frames of Reference</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/" />
    
    <id>tag:www.dyeager.org,2011-12-23:/blog//1</id>
    <updated>2012-05-07T14:53:33Z</updated>
    <subtitle>...because it's 2:59AM</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/FramesOfReference" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="framesofreference" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">FramesOfReference</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry>
    <title>RIP Ginger: 1996–2012</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/2012/05/rip-ginger.html" />
    <id>tag:www.dyeager.org,2012:/blog//1.272</id>

    <published>2012-05-07T14:49:43Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-07T14:53:33Z</updated>

    <summary>I’d like to thank my loyal subscribers for staying with me. I had planned to continue with my series “Physics and the Bible” but sometimes life intervenes and things don’t go as planned; our series will continue next week. My...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Darrin Yeager</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Christian Living" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I’d like to thank my loyal subscribers for staying with me. I had planned to continue with my series “Physics and the Bible” but sometimes life intervenes and things don’t go as planned; our series will continue next week.</p>

<p>My dog died Sunday, and I just don’t feel much like writing. </p>

<p>Sure, she was 16 years old, frankly longer than a Dachshund should live, and we all knew everyday she woke up was another gift from God, but still, the loss of a dog is #2 on the <a href="http://artofmanliness.com/2008/06/19/when-is-it-okay-for-a-man-to-cry/">when is it okay for a man to cry</a> list (and well, I didn’t sleep much either, and neither did my other dog).</p>

<p>But as I’ve always said, we’re not much for news around here, we’re more interested in what we can learn from it. I’m fairly confident most people aren’t really interested in my dog, but they might be interested in a new emphasis on an old idea.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<h2>Pardon the Interruption</h2>

<p>Okay, allow me to share one thing from my dog before we move on (sort of a eulogy, you might say). In one of my books I wrote about how much you can learn from your dog, so allow me to wander down memory lane a bit, and then we’ll get to the point — I promise.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>When we brought home our puppy our backyard was a mess — the fence needed repair and nearly toppled over on its own. To prevent the puppy escaping from the yard and running out into the street in front of a car the fence needed repair, which we diligently set out to do.</p>

<p>Dachshunds are social creatures, they like to remain with their family so we had a problem — we needed to fix the fence, yet the puppy wanted to stay with us while we worked. In an attempt to remedy the situation, we set up a portable kennel on the patio while we worked repairing the fence. And you know what comes next…</p>

<p>Yap, yap, yap. Bark, bark, bark. Whine, whine, whine. Yap, bark, whine … (you get the idea).</p>

<p>The puppy simply wouldn’t remain quiet. I thought, you don’t understand, the fence needs to be fixed so you won’t run out into the street and get squished by a car (the dog only being 8 inches tall you know). It’s for <em>your</em> benefit, just wait and it will be better soon. But try as I could, the dog didn’t understand — yap, yap, yap, bark, bark, bark. And then the Lord responded…</p>

<p><em>You’re the dog</em>.</p>

<p>To which I quickly replied --- yap, yap, yap. Bark, bark, bark. Whine, whine, whine…</p>

<p>You may not see the final plan; you may <em>never</em> see the final plan. That doesn’t mean God doesn’t have one, and it’s better than the one you thought up. Don’t be the dog yapping along complaining about something you know nothing about as you see through the glass darkly. ("<a href="http://framesofreferencellc.com/catalog/9780983111702/">The Troubled Church</a>", page 145–146)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Thanks girl, may the lessons you taught never be forgotten. You will be missed.</p>

<h2>The Origin of Death</h2>

<p>I watched my dog get old, and slowly begin to shut down, a product of decay and simply old age. That’s when it hit me: <strong>Satan stinks — <em>You took my dog, you sick bastard</em>.</strong></p>

<p>Oh, not directly (unless something was going on I didn’t know about), but he’s responsible nonetheless. Allow me to paraphrase.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>On the fifth day God created Dachshunds, and all manner of dogs, along with everything that swims in the river, different kinds of birds, and each produced many offspring, <strong>and God saw that that they were good</strong>. (Genesis 1:21, Yeager translation)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>God loves dogs, and if a bird can’t fall to the ground without His knowledge, surely He looks after His creation as well (we’ll come back to that in a second, or as Paul Harvey would say, you’ll get <em>the rest of the story</em>).</p>

<p>Of course, you’ve heard the phrase “no good deed goes unpunished”, so cue the creepy music as the evil villain enters the scene.</p>

<p>Once again, from my own paraphrase:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Now the snake was more cunning and deceitful than any family-friendly pet which God had made, and he slithered up to the woman and said “Did God say you shall not eat of any tree?” And the woman said “we shalt not eat of the tree in the middle of the garden, lest entropy and decay enter the cosmos, and we die”. Then the slimy snake lied to her face saying, “you shall not die” …</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Well, you know the rest of the story, but it ends thousands of years later with <strong>You took my dog, you sick bastard</strong>.</p>

<p>The physicist in me understands what happened — entropy entered into the world, better known as decay, death, and sin. A dog isn’t supposed to live 16 years; mine did. Still, it’s sad to watch the end.</p>

<p>I could go on for hours delving into that, but it’s much easier to say</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>You took my dog, you sick bastard.</p>
</blockquote>

<h2>The (kind of) Happy Ending</h2>

<p>God does look after His creation, for you see we were scheduled to be out of town this weekend, but had to cancel for other reasons. Perhaps it’s reading too many Navy Seal books, but I’m of the thought no dog should die alone, they should be with their family when they pass.</p>

<p>Mine was.</p>

<p>And that, as Paul Harvey would say, is the rest of the story.</p>

<h2>So What?</h2>

<p>Chuck  Missler said you can measure your spiritual maturity by asking “How much do you hate sin?” I awoke today (well, not really awoke because that implies sleep) with a new understanding of the pain and anguish God must feel over His creation tormented by entropy (death, decay).</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>You took my dog, you sick bastard.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Sin and satan stink, because they conspired with malice, forethought, and hate to take my dog — and everything before, as well as what will come after.</p>

<p>Yeah, he took my dog, but he can’t win, <em>and he knows it</em>.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Satan (who deceived mankind and caused death) was thrown into the lake of fire where his cohorts are. And they will stay there forever, never to hurt another puppy ever again. (Revelation 20:10 YT)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Checkmate. Game, set, match. The fat lady sung. <strong>Hasta la vista, baby</strong>.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Now I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. Also there was no more sea. Then I, John, saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from heaven saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and He will dwell with them, and they shall be His people. God Himself will be with them and be their God. And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away.” Then He who sat on the throne said, “Behold, I make all things new.” And He said to me, “Write, for these words are true and faithful.” And He said to me, “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. I will give of the fountain of the water of life freely to him who thirsts.” (Revelation 21:1--6 NKJV)</p>
</blockquote>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Physics and the Bible: Duality of Light and 1 John</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/2012/05/physics-and-the-bible-duality-of-light-and-1-john.html" />
    <id>tag:www.dyeager.org,2012:/blog//1.271</id>

    <published>2012-05-04T18:41:47Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-04T18:44:48Z</updated>

    <summary>I’ve said many times to understand your Bible you must understand Physics. Yes, you don’t necessarily have to, but many times some basic understanding of Physics clears up controversy or provides insight. Don’t worry, we won’t be delving too much...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Darrin Yeager</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bible Study" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Science and the Bible" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I’ve said many times to understand your Bible you must understand Physics. Yes, you don’t necessarily <em>have</em> to, but many times some basic understanding of Physics clears up controversy or provides insight. Don’t worry, we won’t be delving too much into long technical discussions as we’re interested in application of the Bible, not science for science sake.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In part I of this series, we’ll consider a passage in 1 John — perhaps one of the most troubling in the Bible.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that <strong>God is light</strong>, and in him is no darkness at all (1 John 1:5).</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Most people don’t see a problem with that, unless you’ve heard of the following…</p>

<h2>Wave-Particle Duality of Light</h2>

<p>We’re all familiar with light acting as a wave, like when you throw a rock in a pool. You can see the pattern, and a wave bouncing off a side will interfere with other waves as it travels back.</p>

<p>If you’ve watched Star Trek at all, it seems just about every episode has the phrase “load photon torpedoes” — a photon is a particle of light (the Star Trek weapon didn’t seem to use actual photons, but I’m not a Trekkie interested in fictional technology). Light can also exist as a particle, like a golf ball. If you’ve played in those boxes filled with balls, you see an entirely different set of rules at work.</p>

<p>Light exists with dual-properties. Experiments with light can obtain either the wave nature, or the particle nature, but not both at the same time; light exists as two-in-one — two natures together, yet distinct.</p>

<p>Note: for those interested in details, look up the two-slit experiment with light and you’ll find plenty to occupy your time.</p>

<h2>Keeping Awake at Night</h2>

<p>Now you see that problem, God <em>is</em> light — not light-like, not having the characteristics of light. If God is a trinity (and He is), and light exists as a duality (and it does), Houston, we’ve got a problem.</p>

<p>The passage causing sleepless nights, in Greek:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>θεός ἐστί φῶς (theos esti phōs, or God is light)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>You’ll find it’s translated correctly, God is Light, so the problem isn’t in translation.</p>

<p>What do we do? If the Bible is inerrant (and it is), and the wave-particle duality of light is true (and it is), how do we solve the apparent inherit contradiction between duality and trinity? As always, the answer appears elsewhere in the Bible.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>But when the Helper comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me. (John 15:26 NKJV)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>There’s the answer. The Holy Spirit doesn’t speak of Himself, only of Jesus.</p>

<p>It will turn out light does actually have three properties, but the third will only be observable by indirect means, because under experimental conditions it looks like either a wave or particle — as John wrote the Holy Spirit will testify of Jesus.</p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Physics and the Bible</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/2012/04/physics-and-the-bible.html" />
    <id>tag:www.dyeager.org,2012:/blog//1.270</id>

    <published>2012-04-27T18:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-26T19:27:54Z</updated>

    <summary>I’ve said many times (tongue-in-cheek) to understand your Bible you must understand Physics. Yet the longer I study the Bible, the less tongue-in-cheek I believe that is. To explore this a bit we’re starting a three-part series where we’ll discuss...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Darrin Yeager</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bible Study" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Science and the Bible" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I’ve said many times (tongue-in-cheek) to understand your Bible you must understand Physics. Yet the longer I study the Bible, the less tongue-in-cheek I believe that is. To explore this a bit we’re starting a three-part series where we’ll discuss several Biblical ideas, and how modern Physics assists understanding the Bible.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<ol>
<li>Wave-particle duality of light, and 1 John.</li>
<li>Quantum tunneling, and Zechariah.</li>
<li>Free will vs. predestination, and relativity.</li>
</ol>

<p>While it’s certainly true you don’t <em>have</em> to have a PhD in Physics to understand your Bible, it’s also true basic scientific applications can illuminate passages, or (in the case of Calvinism) solve centuries old debates the church has long fought over.</p>

<p>Using physical laws with the Bible should make since, since God created the world it’s understandable He’d pattern it after spiritual ideas. While the Bible isn’t a science textbook, it does contain principles which follow established principles of Physics.</p>

<p>If you’ve got other areas you’d like to see explored, leave a comment, Tweet, send an email, use smoke signals, or something to communicate what you would like to see, and we'll add to the list.</p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>What is Integrity?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/2012/04/what-is-integrity.html" />
    <id>tag:www.dyeager.org,2012:/blog//1.269</id>

    <published>2012-04-20T18:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-19T18:54:41Z</updated>

    <summary>If you’ve been watching the news, you’ve heard of the … ahem … improprieties … of the Secret Service. We’re not usually interested in what current news is, but what we can learn from it. What caused this problem?...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Darrin Yeager</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Culture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Ethics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Morality" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you’ve been watching the news, you’ve heard of the … ahem … improprieties … of the Secret Service. We’re not usually interested in what current news <em>is</em>, but what we can learn from it. What caused this problem?</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Simply put, a lack of integrity, which begs the question …</p>

<h2>What is Integrity?</h2>

<p>The dictionary defines integrity as <q href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/integrity">adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; honesty</q>, but that doesn’t help much. I prefer a much simpler definition:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Integrity is what you do when nobody is looking.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Do you act one way, and then another?</p>

<ul>
<li>Does a student cheat when the teacher isn’t looking?</li>
<li>Does an employee slack off when the boss isn’t around?</li>
<li>Does a married person engage in an affair if they can keep it hidden?</li>
<li>Does a politician make promises he has no intention of keeping?</li>
<li>Do people say one thing … and then do another?</li>
</ul>

<p>From the President to Congress, politicians say one thing, then do something else. Why? A lack of integrity. For most of Washington, it’s about <em>power</em> and elections, not integrity (or honesty, truth, or reality, but we digress). If they tell the truth at all, it’s not because it’s right, but because it’s a means to an end — election.</p>

<p>And we wonder why the country is a mess? When the highest offices in the land are filled with corruption, scandal, and dishonesty? Why then wonder if that attitude flows down to the Secret Service? After all, they see all the behind-the-scenes garbage.</p>

<h2>God’s View</h2>

<p>The Bible remains clear on integrity.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Who may worship in your sanctuary, LORD? Who may enter your presence on your holy hill. Those who lead blameless lives and do what is right, speaking the truth from sincere hearts. Those who refuse to gossip or harm their neighbors or speak evil of their friends. Those who despise flagrant sinners, and honor the faithful followers of the LORD, and <strong>keep their promises even when it hurts</strong>. Those who lend money without charging interest, and who cannot be bribed to lie about the innocent. Such people will stand firm forever. (Psalm 15, NLT)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Keep their promises even when it hurts? That’s so old-fashioned! Today it’s see you in court, as I’ve got more <del>hired guns</del> lawyers than you do, and more $$$ to fight with.</p>

<p>Consider two examples in the Bible of integrity.</p>

<ul>
<li>Joseph in Egyptian captivity. When his boss’ wife proposed an affair with him, he refused (Genesis 39), even though the morals he was holding to weren’t those of Egypt.</li>
<li>Daniel in chapter 1 of Daniel as he refused the king’s food, as he “purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king’s meat, nor with the wine which he drank”. Once again, nobody would care what he ate — but Daniel held to a higher morality.</li>
</ul>

<p>Those two men held to their standards even if nobody cared, or noticed. That’s integrity.</p>

<p>The Secret Service guys got into trouble for a simple reason — they thought nobody was looking. I’m sure if they knew what they did would become known, they would have thought twice about it. From the President to Congress and more, the country suffers from a lack of integrity — people who <em>know</em> they’re doing the wrong thing, but trying to avoid detection (or get re-elected in spite of a lack of integrity).</p>

<p>Integrity doesn’t mean being perfect, as we all mess up every day. It means <em>trying</em> to do the moral thing <em>all the time</em>.</p>

<p>Integrity — what you do when nobody is around.</p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Meaning of Easter</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/2012/04/the-meaning-of-easter.html" />
    <id>tag:www.dyeager.org,2012:/blog//1.268</id>

    <published>2012-04-13T18:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-11T15:10:45Z</updated>

    <summary>I read a lot of blogs of all types, but one thing catching me by surprise was a number of people on a liberal Christian blog saying they didn’t like Easter, were depressed, didn’t celebrate it, didn’t understand it, had...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Darrin Yeager</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Christian Living" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Doctrine" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I read a <em>lot</em> of blogs of all types, but one thing catching me by surprise was a number of people on a liberal Christian blog saying they didn’t like Easter, were depressed, didn’t celebrate it, didn’t understand it, had doubts, or something similar.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>What? <em>The</em> defining event of Christianity?</p>

<p>Perhaps it’s because they don’t really understand Easter. </p>

<p>You see, religious people of the liberal/progressive type use <a href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/2009/06/didactic-dialectic-thought.html">dialectic reasoning</a> to <a href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/2011/06/red-letter-christianity-clueless-about-sin.html">shift definitions</a> and modify (or ignore) what the Bible says. Those groups don’t really know <em>what</em> they believe, because they’ll believe anything (and everything … or nothing). That’s the ruinous, deadly poison liberal theology and <a href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/book/its-259-am/post-modern-philosophy-church.html">post-modern philosophy</a> infect the church with.</p>

<p>Post-modern liberals deny truth, so the absolute truth of Easter and the Gospel are lost on them. Some liberals even go far as to <a href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/2010/08/social-justice-counterfeit-christian-gospel.html">replace Easter (the Gospel) with good works</a> and other strange ideas. For those in that group, it’s no wonder they’re confused.</p>

<h2>What is the Gospel?</h2>

<p>For all those liberal progressives, let’s remind everyone exactly <em>what</em> the Gospel is, from Paul:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Moreover, brethren, <strong>I declare to you the gospel</strong> which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you—unless you believed in vain. For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that <strong>Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures</strong>, and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve. (1 Corinthians 15:1–5 NKJV)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Paul reminded the Galatians that <em>anyone</em> accepting another Gospel is (to paraphrase) in big trouble. The Gospel is <em>NOT</em> social justice, good works, common good, happy thoughts, heaven on earth, or any other liberal/progressive theological nonsense. It’s quite simple:</p>

<ul>
<li>Humans are sinners missing God’s requirements.</li>
<li>Thus, to be with a perfect God the penalty for sin <em>must</em> be paid.</li>
<li>That penalty requires a perfect, sinless sacrifice.</li>
<li>Jesus paid that penalty for us.</li>
<li>He died, and rose the third day (Easter!).</li>
<li>By accepting Him as Lord and Savior we can have our sins forgiven. </li>
</ul>

<p>Now, <em>that’s</em> good news.</p>

<h2>The Poison of Liberal Theology</h2>

<p>If you’re confused on what the Gospel is, it’s no wonder Easter—the very foundation of Christianity—becomes confusing as you’ve lost <a href="http://www.dyeager.org/blog/2012/01/what-is-the-objective-of-christianity.html">the objective of Christianity</a>, replacing it with some liberal, progressive mumbo-jumbo.</p>

<p>That’s the problem caused by liberal, progressive, emerging, post-modern theology (or whatever else the latest fully buzzword-compliant term is) — once you ignore what the text plainly says, you’re left with nothing as anyone can make the text say anything they want, so the text <em>does</em> say anything, which means it says … nothing.</p>

<p>And <em>that</em> folks, could certainly cause confusion over Easter.</p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

