<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Finz Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://finzblog.com</link>
	<description>Welcome to the Blog for Finz Advance Tapes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 19:53:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Welcome to the Blog for Finz Advance Tapes</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://finzblog.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Welcome to the Blog for Finz Advance Tapes</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/FinzBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="finzblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Flores v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinzBlog/~3/AifLOfRFUD0/</link>
		<comments>http://finzblog.com/2013/05/flores-v-presbyterian-intercommunity-hospital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 19:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Torts Case Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finzblog.com/?p=1066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flores v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital (Tort Limitations) 213 Cal.App.4th 1386 REV GRANTED [See CCP §§ 335.1, 340.5(2); Gopaul v. Herrick Memorial Hosp. (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 1002]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flores v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital (Tort Limitations) 213 Cal.App.4th 1386 REV GRANTED [See CCP §§ 335.1, 340.5(2); Gopaul v. Herrick Memorial Hosp. (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 1002]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FinzBlog/~4/AifLOfRFUD0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finzblog.com/2013/05/flores-v-presbyterian-intercommunity-hospital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://finz.pincusproed.com/podcasts/Audio/FZ.CaseUpdates.019.mp3" length="2297218" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>CA Torts Case Law Update,case updates,Civil Procedure,lawyer,Litigation,Torts</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Flores v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital (Tort Limitations) 213 Cal.App.4th 1386 REV GRANTED [See CCP §§ 335.1, 340.5(2); Gopaul v. Herrick Memorial Hosp. (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 1002]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Flores v. Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital (Tort Limitations) 213 Cal.App.4th 1386 REV GRANTED [See CCP §§ 335.1, 340.5(2); Gopaul v. Herrick Memorial Hosp. (1974) 38 Cal.App.3d 1002]</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>2:22</itunes:duration>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://finzblog.com/2013/05/flores-v-presbyterian-intercommunity-hospital/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Gregory v. Cott</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinzBlog/~3/M-cbh7uOIRo/</link>
		<comments>http://finzblog.com/2013/05/gregory-v-cott/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 03:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Torts Case Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finzblog.com/?p=1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gregory v. Cott (Assuming the Alzheimer’s Risk) 213 Cal.App.4th 41 Rev Granted [See Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296; ( Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (2012) 55 Cal.4th 1148, T/AT 01/13; Beninati v. Black Rock City, LLC [ (2009) ] 175 Cal.App.4th 650, T/AT 08/09; Herrle v. Estate of Marshall (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1761]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregory v. Cott (Assuming the Alzheimer’s Risk) 213 Cal.App.4th 41 Rev Granted [See Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296; ( Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (2012) 55 Cal.4th 1148, T/AT 01/13; Beninati v. Black Rock City, LLC [ (2009) ] 175 Cal.App.4<sup>th</sup> 650, T/AT 08/09; Herrle v. Estate of Marshall (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1761]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FinzBlog/~4/M-cbh7uOIRo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finzblog.com/2013/05/gregory-v-cott/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://finz.pincusproed.com/podcasts/Audio/FZ.CaseUpdates.018.mp3" length="5666387" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>CA Torts Case Law Update,case updates,Civil Procedure,lawyer,Litigation,Torts</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Gregory v. Cott (Assuming the Alzheimer’s Risk) 213 Cal.App.4th 41 Rev Granted [See Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296; ( Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (2012) 55 Cal.4th 1148, T/AT 01/13; Beninati v. Black Rock City, LLC [ (2009) ] 175 Cal.App.4th 650,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Gregory v. Cott (Assuming the Alzheimer’s Risk) 213 Cal.App.4th 41 Rev Granted [See Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296; ( Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (2012) 55 Cal.4th 1148, T/AT 01/13; Beninati v. Black Rock City, LLC [ (2009) ] 175 Cal.App.4th 650, T/AT 08/09; Herrle v. Estate of Marshall (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1761]</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>5:53</itunes:duration>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://finzblog.com/2013/05/gregory-v-cott/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Bell v. Feibush</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinzBlog/~3/RGZpE6XC4v0/</link>
		<comments>http://finzblog.com/2013/04/bell-v-feibush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CA Civ Pro, Discovery, Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Torts Case Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finzblog.com/?p=1046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Treble Damages) 212 Cal.App.4th 1041 [See Cal. Penal Code § 496(a), (c); Heritage Cablevision of Cal., Inc. v. Pusateri (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 517]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Treble Damages) 212 Cal.App.4th 1041 [See Cal. Penal Code § 496(a), (c); Heritage Cablevision of Cal., Inc. v. Pusateri (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 517]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FinzBlog/~4/RGZpE6XC4v0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finzblog.com/2013/04/bell-v-feibush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://finz.pincusproed.com/podcasts/Audio/FZ.CaseUpdates.017.mp3" length="4865159" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>CA Torts Case Law Update,case updates,Civil Procedure,lawyer,Litigation,Torts</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>(Treble Damages) 212 Cal.App.4th 1041 [See Cal. Penal Code § 496(a), (c); Heritage Cablevision of Cal., Inc. v. Pusateri (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 517]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(Treble Damages) 212 Cal.App.4th 1041 [See Cal. Penal Code § 496(a), (c); Heritage Cablevision of Cal., Inc. v. Pusateri (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 517]</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>5:03</itunes:duration>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://finzblog.com/2013/04/bell-v-feibush/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Inc. v. Superior Court</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinzBlog/~3/CqY5QHtoXdQ/</link>
		<comments>http://finzblog.com/2013/04/apple-inc-v-superior-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Torts Case Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finzblog.com/?p=1044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Digital Downloads) 56 Cal.4th 128 [See Cal.Civ.Code § 1747.08; Pineda v. Williams–Sonoma Stores, Inc. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 524, T/AT 03/11]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Digital Downloads) 56 Cal.4th 128 [See Cal.Civ.Code § 1747.08; Pineda v. Williams–Sonoma Stores, Inc. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 524, T/AT 03/11]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FinzBlog/~4/CqY5QHtoXdQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finzblog.com/2013/04/apple-inc-v-superior-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://finz.pincusproed.com/podcasts/Audio/FZ.CaseUpdates.016.mp3" length="3757985" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>CA Torts Case Law Update,case updates,Civil Procedure,lawyer,Litigation,Torts</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>(Digital Downloads) 56 Cal.4th 128 [See Cal.Civ.Code § 1747.08; Pineda v. Williams–Sonoma Stores, Inc. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 524, T/AT 03/11]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>(Digital Downloads) 56 Cal.4th 128 [See Cal.Civ.Code § 1747.08; Pineda v. Williams–Sonoma Stores, Inc. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 524, T/AT 03/11]</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>3:54</itunes:duration>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://finzblog.com/2013/04/apple-inc-v-superior-court/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinzBlog/~3/FkZvSUXqbGo/</link>
		<comments>http://finzblog.com/2013/03/nalwa-v-cedar-fair-l-p/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Torts Case Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finzblog.com/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (Bumper Cars) 55 Cal.4th 1148 [See Beninati v Black Rock City, 175 Cal App 4th 650, T/AT 08/09; Knight v Jewett, 3 Cal 4th 296, T/AT 10/92]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (Bumper Cars) 55 Cal.4th 1148 [See Beninati v Black Rock City, 175 Cal App 4<sup>th</sup> 650, T/AT 08/09; Knight v Jewett, 3 Cal 4<sup>th</sup> 296, T/AT 10/92]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FinzBlog/~4/FkZvSUXqbGo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finzblog.com/2013/03/nalwa-v-cedar-fair-l-p/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://finz.pincusproed.com/podcasts/Audio/FZ.CaseUpdates.015.mp3" length="3801453" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>CA Torts Case Law Update,case updates,Civil Procedure,lawyer,Litigation,Torts</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (Bumper Cars) 55 Cal.4th 1148 [See Beninati v Black Rock City, 175 Cal App 4th 650, T/AT 08/09; Knight v Jewett, 3 Cal 4th 296, T/AT 10/92]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. (Bumper Cars) 55 Cal.4th 1148 [See Beninati v Black Rock City, 175 Cal App 4th 650, T/AT 08/09; Knight v Jewett, 3 Cal 4th 296, T/AT 10/92]</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>3:56</itunes:duration>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://finzblog.com/2013/03/nalwa-v-cedar-fair-l-p/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 SLAPPS – YOUNG v. TRI CITY HEALTHCARE DIST.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinzBlog/~3/Iv6DRFyj9Ek/</link>
		<comments>http://finzblog.com/2013/02/2012-slapps-young-v-tri-city-healthcare-dist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLAPPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Torts Case Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finzblog.com/?p=1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YOUNG v. TRI CITY HEALTHCARE DIST. (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 35 (Doctor’s Writ of Mandate) Kibler v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District (2006) 39 Cal.4th 192; San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District v. Contra Costa Employees’ Retirement Association (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 323; Code Civ. Proc. § 1094.5]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOUNG v. TRI CITY HEALTHCARE DIST. (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 35 (Doctor’s Writ of Mandate) Kibler v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District (2006) 39 Cal.4th 192; San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District v. Contra Costa Employees’ Retirement Association (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 323; Code Civ. Proc. § 1094.5</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FinzBlog/~4/Iv6DRFyj9Ek" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finzblog.com/2013/02/2012-slapps-young-v-tri-city-healthcare-dist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://finz.pincusproed.com/podcasts/Audio/FZ.CaseUpdates.013.mp3" length="4233205" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>CA Torts Case Law Update,case updates,Civil Procedure,lawyer,Litigation,SLAPPS,Torts</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>YOUNG v. TRI CITY HEALTHCARE DIST. (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 35 (Doctor’s Writ of Mandate) Kibler v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District (2006) 39 Cal.4th 192; San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District v.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>YOUNG v. TRI CITY HEALTHCARE DIST. (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 35 (Doctor’s Writ of Mandate) Kibler v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital District (2006) 39 Cal.4th 192; San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District v. Contra Costa Employees’ Retirement Association (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 323; Code Civ. Proc. § 1094.5</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>4:23</itunes:duration>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://finzblog.com/2013/02/2012-slapps-young-v-tri-city-healthcare-dist/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Elijahjuan v. Superior Court</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinzBlog/~3/6Ac8GlJjhJg/</link>
		<comments>http://finzblog.com/2013/02/elijahjuan-v-superior-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Torts Case Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finzblog.com/?p=1026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elijahjuan v. Superior Court [Campbell &#38; Associates] (Post-Concepcion Arbitration] 210 Cal.App.4th 15 REV. DENIED [See AT &#38; T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 131 S.Ct. 1740; Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83; Narayan v. EGL, Inc. (9th Cir.2010) 616 F.3d 895; S.G. Borello &#38; Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elijahjuan v. Superior Court [Campbell &amp; Associates] (Post-Concepcion Arbitration] 210 Cal.App.4th 15 REV. DENIED [See AT &amp; T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 131 S.Ct. 1740; Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83; Narayan v. EGL, Inc. (9th Cir.2010) 616 F.3d 895; S.G. Borello &amp; Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FinzBlog/~4/6Ac8GlJjhJg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finzblog.com/2013/02/elijahjuan-v-superior-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://finz.pincusproed.com/podcasts/Audio/FZ.CaseUpdates.014.mp3" length="6351004" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>CA Torts Case Law Update,case updates,lawyer,Litigation,Torts</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Elijahjuan v. Superior Court [Campbell &amp; Associates] (Post-Concepcion Arbitration] 210 Cal.App.4th 15 REV. DENIED [See AT &amp; T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 131 S.Ct. 1740; Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Elijahjuan v. Superior Court [Campbell &amp; Associates] (Post-Concepcion Arbitration] 210 Cal.App.4th 15 REV. DENIED [See AT &amp; T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 131 S.Ct. 1740; Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83; Narayan v. EGL, Inc. (9th Cir.2010) 616 F.3d 895; S.G. Borello &amp; Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341]</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>6:36</itunes:duration>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://finzblog.com/2013/02/elijahjuan-v-superior-court/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Iskanian v CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinzBlog/~3/Qc6gaoxgC58/</link>
		<comments>http://finzblog.com/2012/10/iskanian-v-cls-transportation-los-angeles-llc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Torts Case Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finzblog.com/?p=1018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ISKANIAN v CLS TRANSPORTATION LOS ANGELES, LLC (Class Action or Mis-Concepcion) 206 CA4 949 REV GRANTED [See Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., AT&#38;T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ISKANIAN v CLS TRANSPORTATION LOS ANGELES, LLC (Class Action or Mis-Concepcion) 206 CA4 949 REV GRANTED [See Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., AT&amp;T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FinzBlog/~4/Qc6gaoxgC58" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finzblog.com/2012/10/iskanian-v-cls-transportation-los-angeles-llc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://finz.pincusproed.com/podcasts/Audio/FZ.CaseUpdates.012.mp3" length="2829357" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>CA Torts Case Law Update,case updates,lawyer,Litigation,Torts</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>ISKANIAN v CLS TRANSPORTATION LOS ANGELES, LLC (Class Action or Mis-Concepcion) 206 CA4 949 REV GRANTED [See Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., AT&amp;T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>ISKANIAN v CLS TRANSPORTATION LOS ANGELES, LLC (Class Action or Mis-Concepcion) 206 CA4 949 REV GRANTED [See Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., AT&amp;T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740]</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>5:49</itunes:duration>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://finzblog.com/2012/10/iskanian-v-cls-transportation-los-angeles-llc/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Howard Entertainment v. Kudrow (August, 2012)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinzBlog/~3/I_LVG9cL6SE/</link>
		<comments>http://finzblog.com/2012/09/howard-entertainment-v-kudrow-august-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CA Civ Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Civ Pro, Discovery, Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA E-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finzblog.com/?p=1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howard Entertainment v. Kudrow (August, 2012) No. B234962 (Expert Foundation) Com. Code § 1303 (com. 5), Evid. Code §§ 720(a), 801(b); Lockheed Litigation Cases (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 558, Alef v. Alta Bates Hospital (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 208; Mann v. Cracchiolo (1985) 38 Cal.3d 18.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard Entertainment v. Kudrow (August, 2012) No. B234962 (Expert Foundation) Com. Code § 1303 (com. 5), Evid. Code §§ 720(a), 801(b); Lockheed Litigation Cases (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 558, Alef v. Alta Bates Hospital (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 208; Mann v. Cracchiolo (1985) 38 Cal.3d 18.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FinzBlog/~4/I_LVG9cL6SE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finzblog.com/2012/09/howard-entertainment-v-kudrow-august-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://finz.pincusproed.com/podcasts/Audio/FZ.CaseUpdates.011.mp3" length="2990404" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>case updates,Civil Procedure,lawyer,Litigation</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Howard Entertainment v. Kudrow (August, 2012) No. B234962 (Expert Foundation) Com. Code § 1303 (com. 5), Evid. Code §§ 720(a), 801(b); Lockheed Litigation Cases (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 558, Alef v. Alta Bates Hospital (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 208; Mann v.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Howard Entertainment v. Kudrow (August, 2012) No. B234962 (Expert Foundation) Com. Code § 1303 (com. 5), Evid. Code §§ 720(a), 801(b); Lockheed Litigation Cases (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 558, Alef v. Alta Bates Hospital (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 208; Mann v. Cracchiolo (1985) 38 Cal.3d 18.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>6:12</itunes:duration>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://finzblog.com/2012/09/howard-entertainment-v-kudrow-august-2012/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Parks v MBNA America Bank (July 2012)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinzBlog/~3/0tdydrQoROw/</link>
		<comments>http://finzblog.com/2012/09/parks-v-mbna-america-bank-july-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 08:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Torts Case Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finzblog.com/?p=994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parks v MBNA America Bank (NBA Preemption) 54 C4 376 [See 12 USC §24; CivCode §1748.9; Rose v Chase Bank, 513 F3 1032 (9th Cir)] The California Supreme Court holds that the National Bank Act (NBA) preempts Civil Code Section 1748.9.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Parks v MBNA America Bank </strong>(NBA Preemption) 54 C4 376 [See 12 USC §24; CivCode §1748.9; <strong> </strong>Rose v Chase Bank, 513 F3 1032 (9<sup>th</sup> Cir)]</p>
<p>The California Supreme Court holds that the National Bank Act (NBA) preempts Civil Code Section 1748.9.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FinzBlog/~4/0tdydrQoROw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finzblog.com/2012/09/parks-v-mbna-america-bank-july-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://finz.pincusproed.com/podcasts/Audio/FZ.CaseUpdates.010.mp3" length="1543221" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>CA Torts Case Law Update,case updates,lawyer,Litigation,Torts</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Parks v MBNA America Bank (NBA Preemption) 54 C4 376 [See 12 USC §24; CivCode §1748.9;  Rose v Chase Bank, 513 F3 1032 (9th Cir)] - The California Supreme Court holds that the National Bank Act (NBA) preempts Civil Code Section 1748.9.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Parks v MBNA America Bank (NBA Preemption) 54 C4 376 [See 12 USC §24; CivCode §1748.9;  Rose v Chase Bank, 513 F3 1032 (9th Cir)]

The California Supreme Court holds that the National Bank Act (NBA) preempts Civil Code Section 1748.9.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Finz Blog</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>3:11</itunes:duration>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://finzblog.com/2012/09/parks-v-mbna-america-bank-july-2012/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
