<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>child custody</category><category>family law</category><category>California family law</category><category>divorce</category><category>Richard Gould-Saltman</category><category>California child custody</category><category>children</category><category>Gould-Saltman Law Offices</category><category>California divorce</category><category>children and law</category><category>child support</category><category>pre-marital</category><category>international family law</category><category>pre-nuptial</category><category>international divorce</category><category>prenuptial agreement</category><category>California marriage</category><category>marriage</category><category>prenup</category><category>same-sex marriage</category><category>Los Angeles family law</category><category>California prenuptial</category><category>parenting</category><category>celebrity divorce</category><category>child care</category><category>domestic partnership</category><category>gay marriage</category><category>international child custody</category><category>child abuse</category><category>divorce settlement</category><category>Gould-Saltman</category><category>child abduction</category><category>international child abduction</category><category>religious liberty</category><category>marriage insurance</category><category>parents</category><category>Constitutional rights</category><category>courts</category><category>divorce lawyer</category><category>interstate divorce</category><category>Defense of Marriage</category><category>Hague Convention</category><category>child support arrears</category><category>custody and religion</category><category>incarcerated parent</category><category>interstate child custody</category><category>religion</category><category>wedding</category><category>Islam</category><category>alternate dispute resolution</category><category>asset division</category><category>civil union</category><category>collecting child support</category><category>court budget</category><category>domestic abuse</category><category>domestic violence</category><category>incarceration and child support</category><category>spousal support</category><category>visitation</category><category>California state budget</category><category>New York divorce</category><category>Sharia</category><category>assisted reproduction</category><category>divorce insurance</category><category>health insurance</category><category>medical treatment of children</category><category>monitored visits; supervised visits;</category><category>paternity</category><category>support</category><category>Affordable Health Care Act</category><category>COBRA</category><category>Washington D.C.</category><category>avoiding support</category><category>child support services</category><category>contempt</category><category>drug abuse and custody</category><category>duty to disclose</category><category>incarceration;</category><category>jurisdiction</category><category>marijuana</category><category>medical marijuana</category><category>omitted asset</category><category>parental alienation</category><category>recession</category><category>self help</category><category>self-help</category><category>separation</category><category>violation of custody orders</category><category>Covered California</category><category>Egypt</category><category>Einstein</category><category>Iowa</category><category>MLB</category><category>McCourt</category><category>Obama</category><category>Porsche</category><category>Social Security</category><category>Superlawyers</category><category>Supreme Court</category><category>Tribal Court</category><category>UCCJEA</category><category>Vermont</category><category>White House</category><category>adoption</category><category>adultery</category><category>affidavit of paternity</category><category>alimony</category><category>arbitration</category><category>baseball</category><category>birth parents&#39; rights</category><category>change of custody</category><category>child support and death of child</category><category>child support and incarceration</category><category>child support and procreation</category><category>child support arrears;</category><category>children and health insurance</category><category>communtiy property</category><category>concealing assets</category><category>counseling</category><category>custody and grandparents</category><category>debt division</category><category>declaration of paternity</category><category>demographics</category><category>drug use</category><category>economy</category><category>failure to pay child support</category><category>fault</category><category>gambling winnings and child support</category><category>genetic testing</category><category>grandparent custodial rights</category><category>guardian ad litem</category><category>illegal alien</category><category>immigration</category><category>interference with custody</category><category>judges</category><category>lottery winnings and support</category><category>modification of support</category><category>murder</category><category>name changes</category><category>no-fault divorce</category><category>octuplets</category><category>parental rights</category><category>payment of child support</category><category>preference testimony</category><category>proof of payment of child support</category><category>psychologists</category><category>psychotherapy</category><category>quitting job to avoid support</category><category>restraining orders</category><category>retirement</category><category>social media</category><category>sports</category><category>testimony of child</category><category>therapy</category><category>vaccination</category><category>violation of court orders</category><category>visitation; foster care;</category><category>welfare and child support</category><category>withholding medical treatment</category><title>Family Law Guy</title><description>with Richard Gould-Saltman&#xa;&#xa;</description><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>154</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2251140677852687854</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2015-11-19T14:34:00.958-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">California divorce</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">separation</category><title>How Do I Refer...?  III.  Someone Who Isn’t Separated, and Hasn’t Reached a Decision About Ending Their Marriage? </title><atom:summary type="text">

Counseling a client who is contemplating separation or divorce, or even “maybe thinking” about one, is among the most sensitive tasks family law attorneys face, and it draws as much on our counseling skill-set as it does on our lawyering.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The reasons for ending a marriage are even more varied than the reasons for starting one, and the level of emotion can be just as high, or higher.</atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2015/11/how-do-i-refer-iii-someone-who-isnt.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNVdFOeZnyiqDXXYIOtu4YKgNxiNZb_bC5Q6beKLLVbT0axdjiFqOWd5fhqsBTGpcC_F27siEyyK5M7ryCAYaR3TGxF5A5dBGdOa5hjDL2hh7AF52wMP_SFf32IY_bKbL5F4GmSD5xZiN0/s72-c/bigstock-Sitting-couple-are-separated-b-48697304.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-3860640657229746072</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2015-10-06T11:03:05.703-07:00</atom:updated><title>How Do I Refer...? II.  A Client With Alcohol/Drug/Significant Mental Health Issues?</title><atom:summary type="text">


Mental illness, drugs and alcohol.&amp;nbsp; They are the fodder of the divorce tabloids, and a source of anxiety for clients with family law issues who also are struggling with these problems.&amp;nbsp; Family law clients, particularly parents,&amp;nbsp; fear a public parading of their substance or psychological health issues by their soon-to-be-exes. even if nobody’s holding a press conference in which </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2015/09/how-do-i-refer-ii-client-with.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV7XoQQ2XCFgE8JumJN9rKQKJ4AO2ejGKdFHwYBCQW_lx1KubUFl-YzEmINTqPgCRfM73MHl7LENActNgeBMxjg7fl3ymKDaETPyAdDzHxWUM7B4crLZZxFTNQk2LZgb-ZZLAhCS5F0nBY/s72-c/bigstock-Woman-In-Depressed-Mood-Sits-O-89032895.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-6994838101947139816</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2016-02-16T15:04:47.531-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">international child custody</category><title>&quot;How Do I Refer....?&quot;  I: Re-Locating Parents</title><atom:summary type="text">Ten Posts directed to trusted advisors, addressing issues of referring &quot;clients with issues&quot;, to whom G.S.L.O. can provide ingenuity and practicality in advice and assistance:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;

&amp;nbsp;
I of X:

HOW DO I REFER A PARENT WHO WANTS TO RELOCATE WITH A CHILD?

Recent news stories about the ongoing Kelly Rutherford litigation&amp;nbsp; have brought parental relocation issues to the public </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2015/08/how-do-i-refer-part-i.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQveOvlGva7B2vVU2NlRwg-7WIy3zNsWlc5PbYbaZp58oTONutE7Zn2POzD7Bplzz1uCJvQ9arjjgOi4dQJeKYxgVnklQBAp1uXKjQBNEy819V8rVwV6F2aa3bDzHkZgOCOors2hADgH5o/s72-c/bigstock-Representation-of-marriage-bre-38616298.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-9037538796443748583</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2016-03-16T11:37:11.225-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">California child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gould-Saltman Law Offices</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">medical treatment of children</category><title>Vaccination and Parents&#39; Rights: Who Decides?</title><atom:summary type="text">

Courts are being asked to decide vaccination issues between disagreeing parents in child custody cases . These disagreements are catching the public&#39;s eye and ears in the wake of the Disneyland measles outbreak, and the public opposition to mandatory vaccination by prominent or at least visible people, who are mostly not scientists.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;

If you have parenting or custody issues connected</atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2015/04/vaccination-parents-rights-and-child.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-PcOnkX0riq7ndrnyewNGbZUqeZsNjPqra8jCDMpBmE2D6x5G7B9XSsxd18ZdBCHAq8YQGIkDITxLr-QgI771hHYOeQUF09VqGlAzqCbVxawK5w_JcdrBsTy4rFK1ujWx1Jd3jEXegnGi/s72-c/vaccinate.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2659578927495185425</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2015-10-06T14:33:34.548-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">California family law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">divorce</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">family law</category><title>Pet Custody?  What&#39;s The Standard?</title><atom:summary type="text">

Recent changes in the California version of the Domestic Violence Prevention Act now permit a judge making a restraining order, to make an order for &quot;... the exclusive care, possession, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence.... The court may order the respondent to stay away from the</atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2015/01/pet-custody-whats-standard.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkNMLg0q-tmKbupslKg80S-Qxf-9dFvBLcx5Mu76DJS0tnPNlAy7i1ogmftX9DapWVmJpugF_F-edwfKz7zbVBbwX_wFfVnyUAslpfw52DKCQ7pDUtrdezL6ED88I-UiA8rk9xm8smqWTi/s72-c/dog.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4218526878564456842</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2015-08-25T10:19:49.063-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gould-Saltman Law Offices</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">marriage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">marriage insurance</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pre-marital</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pre-nuptial</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">prenuptial agreement</category><title>Spend More Time talking About The Relationship, and Less Money on the Ring, the Wedding (and the Divorce?)</title><atom:summary type="text">



An Emory University study suggests that there is an inverse correlation between the amount a couple spends on the engagement ring and the wedding, and the chance that the marriage will last.&amp;nbsp; I have my own theories about why this correlation may exist, but it does re-emphasize my &quot;sermon&quot; about pre-marital planning.&amp;nbsp; While sitting down and talking about what you intend in the </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/11/spend-more-time-talking-about.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEimcb92SIq_Bb7tEavzDlreGmi83FgJvezsaSJTGedjJOw7haQoGysb7qPHMnobO8IQnT81a67WnD5daoVsE3_SsBI_Tn0a5soKyWhqKvoyCHPI965B2sI5UOCgD7xFBU_8vtDhyphenhyphenPdv7OBg/s72-c/rins+hammer.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2012934803682401229</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-10-01T09:47:33.585-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">California marriage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">marriage</category><title>&quot;Conscious Coupling&quot;  What Is Marriage Supposed To Do?  Does It Still Do It?</title><atom:summary type="text">One of the recurring themes of this blog has been &quot;Why do people get married?&amp;nbsp; What will help then accomplish whatever it is they want to accomplish by marrying?&quot;

It appears that the number of Americans, over-all, who believe that marriage does what they want done, continues to shrink, even as the broader recognition of same-sex marriage would seem logically to have increased it.&amp;nbsp; </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/10/conscious-coupling-what-is-marriage.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-5497497916171405339</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-09-23T16:22:03.152-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support arrears</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">collecting child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">gambling winnings and child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">payment of child support</category><title>Gambling Winnings and Child Support</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ohio has now implemented an intercept program so that winners at the four casinos in Ohio may trigger data base checks.&amp;nbsp; If the winner wins $1,200 or more from slot machines, $5,000 or more from table games or $600 or more from high-stakes games, then their name is checked against a data base for child support owed.&amp;nbsp; If anything is owed, it is taken out of the </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/09/gambling-winnings-and-child-support.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-8306383822600915496</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-08-25T15:17:39.173-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child abduction</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child abuse</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">incarcerated parent</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">self help</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">self-help</category><title>Exercising Self-Help in Custody Cases</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Kathleen Aubain is in the Oneida County Jail in New York for violating a court order.&amp;nbsp; Aubain has a two and a half year old daughter, Isabellah Rose Campos with Eric Campos.&amp;nbsp; All three were living in Arizona.&amp;nbsp; Campos has custody of Isabellah. Aubain’s mother says the only reason Campos has custody is because Aubain didn’t bring Isabellah back to him at the end of</atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/08/exercising-self-help-in-custody-cases.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1314494980203179405</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-09-12T10:12:59.297-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">California child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">custody and religion</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gould-Saltman Law Offices</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">violation of custody orders</category><title>Child Custody And Religion (Again): What Should Happen When One Parent Converts?  </title><atom:summary type="text">We&#39;ve got another child custody and religion case from New York, about, at least ostensibly,&amp;nbsp; what should happen when one parent, but not the other, decides to &quot;change horses mid-stream&quot; in terms of the child&#39;s religious upbringing.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;

A closer reading of the facts suggests that other facts played a much greater role in the decision than the religion issue did, and that the judge </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/08/child-custody-and-religion-again.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-222929258937333402</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-08-12T13:38:44.522-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">California child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">custody and grandparents</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">grandparent custodial rights</category><title>Grandparent Custodial Rights</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Interesting read regarding grandparent rights.&amp;nbsp; The Court of Appeals upheld a Dependency Court order granting a grandmother visitation rights.&amp;nbsp; It’s a case right here in Los Angeles County involving DCFS.&amp;nbsp;

http://www.metnews.com/articles/2014/visitation080814.htmGrandparent rights come up relatively regularly, but I don&#39;t believe that this case will necessarily </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/08/grandparent-custodial-rights.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-6025258107245391342</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-07-21T17:07:15.018-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child abduction</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">contempt</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">interference with custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">violation of court orders</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">violation of custody orders</category><title>Interference with Child Custody</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp; Maria Jose Carrascosa, 48, is a native of Spain and lived in Fort Lee, New Jersey. She had a child, a daughter, with Peter Innes while in New Jersey and the couple separated in 2004.&amp;nbsp; They signed a parenting agreement prohibiting either parent from taking the child out of the country without the consent of the other.&amp;nbsp; In 2005, while custody was still unresolved, Carrascosa took </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/07/interference-with-child-custody.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2520437856400123668</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-09-11T16:35:05.616-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">California child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">preference testimony</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">testimony of child</category><title>Should a Very Young Child Give Preference Testimony?</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Professional basketball player, Chris Bosh, has been in a custody battle over his young year old daughter with the child’s mother, Allison Mathis.&amp;nbsp; Apparently Mathis is requesting that their daughter, Trinity, (either four or five years old), testify in court.&amp;nbsp; 

http://cocoafab.com/uh-oh-chris-boshs-baby-mother-seeks-to-have-their-child-testify-in-custody-battle/http</atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/07/should-five-year-old-give-preference.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2358808704323156326</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-07-07T16:01:20.937-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support and incarceration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support arrears</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">contempt</category><title>Update on Failure to Make Child Support Payments</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; An update on my previous blog from last week (July 1)!&amp;nbsp; Apparently, Houston resident, Clifford Hall, who was jailed for failing to pay child support has been released after one week.&amp;nbsp; Hall’s wages were being withheld to pay the child support but, due to some type of clerical error by his employer, the wages were improperly withheld or not being paid to the mother.&amp;</atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/07/update-on-failure-to-make-child-support.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-3057767396549168068</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-09-11T16:35:35.896-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">California divorce</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">divorce</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">divorce settlement</category><title>&quot;Grey&quot; Divorce and Retirement Plans</title><atom:summary type="text">From today&#39;s New York Times</atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/07/grey-divorce-and-retirement-plans.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4382805427708771364</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-07-01T14:57:25.998-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support arrears</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">failure to pay child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">incarceration and child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">proof of payment of child support</category><title>Failure to Make Child Support Payments</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Clifford Hall from Houston, Texas was sentenced to six months in jail for failure to pay his child support.&amp;nbsp; He fell behind and owed more than $3,000 in child support.&amp;nbsp; His wages were garnished but his company failed to submit the money to the court for his ex-wife to collect.&amp;nbsp; Hall has become current plus an extra $1,000 but could not avoid facing jail time </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/07/failure-to-make-child-support-payments.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4158657663149534353</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-06-19T09:57:12.064-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child abduction</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gould-Saltman</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gould-Saltman Law Offices</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">international child abduction</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">international child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">international divorce</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">international family law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">interstate child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">jurisdiction</category><title>International Child Custody and Child Abduction:  Who Are The &quot;Good Guy&quot; and  &quot;Bad Guy&quot; Countries? The Most Recent Hague Convention Report</title><atom:summary type="text">The most recent State Department Report on Compliance with the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction shows that even those countries which have signed off on the Convention do not always comply with it.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Even Western Hemisphere countries, including Costa
Rica, Guatemala, and Honduras, are inconsistent in their compliance.&amp;nbsp; If you&#39;re in a dispute </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/06/international-child-custody-and-child.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-6392124087675659778</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-06-20T17:10:11.904-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">avoiding support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">quitting job to avoid support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">spousal support</category><title>Consequences of Intentionally Avoiding Support</title><atom:summary type="text">Buena Park city council member, Sangjin Miller Oh, age 50, was convicted of five counts of perjury by declaration.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Between September 23, 2004 and July 20, 2009, Oh signed official DMV documents using fraudulent information on five separate occasions.&amp;nbsp; He did this to avoid paying child support to his ex-wife by hiding his assets under a false name. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Apparently, </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/06/consequences-of-intentionally-avoiding.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2212237418090383810</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-06-13T14:45:52.340-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support arrears</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">collecting child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">incarcerated parent</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">incarceration and child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">incarceration;</category><title>Child Support Owed to an Incarcerated Parent</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Tracey Richter is serving life in prison in Iowa for the 2001 murder of 20 year old Dustin Wehde.&amp;nbsp; Richter has been receiving child support arrears payments from her ex-husband, Michael Roberts who began paying back the child support owed after their divorce.&amp;nbsp; After she had received $2,000 in payments from Roberts, a judge ordered that Richter no longer has any </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/06/child-support-owed-to-incarcerated.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-6643922185826562714</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-06-19T10:21:16.657-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">family law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">international family law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">marriage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">marriage insurance</category><title>If You&#39;re Going To Get Married, Please Do It Correctly</title><atom:summary type="text">This new case from New York stands for the (reasonably obvious?)&amp;nbsp; proposition that if you scrupulously avoid doing any of those things which would cause you to have a valid marriage, then you&#39;re not married, even if you have a big elaborate &quot;wedding&quot;,&amp;nbsp; presided over by an internet-ordained &quot;clergyperson&quot;, who also fails to do any of those things.

The take-away, for me, is the Court&#39;s </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/06/if-youre-going-to-get-married-please-do.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-7488228946514220987</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-06-04T13:52:26.795-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">affidavit of paternity</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support services</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">declaration of paternity</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">genetic testing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">paternity</category><title>Child Support for a Non-Biological Child</title><atom:summary type="text">Brian F., a Minnesota man, signed an affidavit of paternity in 1995, five months after a baby boy was born.&amp;nbsp; That child is now 19 years old.&amp;nbsp; Brian was ordered to pay child support and in 2009, the state removed the boy from his mother’s custody and the state asked for an increase of child support from Brian F. to $369 per month.&amp;nbsp; In 2011, Brian requested the child support be </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/06/child-support-for-non-biological-child.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-896129259962181240</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-05-28T11:28:50.045-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">adoption</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">birth parents&#39; rights</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">change of custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child care</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">children and law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">incarcerated parent</category><title>Incarcerated Birth Parents&#39; Rights to Their Children</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Kim and Dave Hodgin became the foster parents of Sonya before she was two.&amp;nbsp; She was adopted by them in 2008.&amp;nbsp; Before the adoption was finalized, Sonya’s birth father, John McCaul pled guilty to transporting firearms and was sentenced to 15 years in federal prison.&amp;nbsp; Under Tennessee law, parents who are incarcerated for more than ten years do not have any rights to</atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/05/incarcerated-birth-parents-rights-to.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-3191617442968579569</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-05-19T15:47:37.608-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support and procreation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child support arrears</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">incarceration and child support</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">support</category><title>No More Babies if You Owe Support?</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In September 2012, an Ohio man, Asim Taylor, 36 years old now, pled guilty to four charges of non-payment of child support for his four children and was sentenced to five years of probation.&amp;nbsp; In January 2013, Taylor agreed and was ordered to pay $1,700 of his $96,000 arrearage by October 16, 2013 or else he would serve 30 days in jail (a process called a “purge”).&amp;nbsp; </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/05/no-more-babies-if-you-owe-support.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1832792633195601186</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-05-13T14:00:10.980-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">child custody</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">family law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">jurisdiction</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tribal Court</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">UCCJEA</category><title>Validity of Custody Orders Issued by a Tribal Court</title><atom:summary type="text">&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Layla Billie and Kevin Stier had two children. Billie is a Native American part of the Miccosukee tribe in Florida.&amp;nbsp; Stier is non-Native American.&amp;nbsp; They were never married and it’s unclear whether they ever lived together. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Billie initiated custody proceedings in Miccosukee Tribal Court on October 1, 2012.&amp;nbsp; The Tribal Court accepted jurisdiction</atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/05/validity-of-custody-orders-issued-by.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Karen Cynn)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-28736765754770159</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-06-10T11:04:35.216-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">California marriage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">celebrity divorce</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">marriage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">marriage insurance</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">prenup</category><title>&quot;Coupling&quot; and &quot;Uncoupling&quot;, Conscious Or Not</title><atom:summary type="text">“Conscious Uncoupling” is the most recent &quot;flavor of the month”&amp;nbsp; to be launched into the popular terminology and fashion in divorce, following on the heels of “Integrative divorce”, “collaborative divorce”, and&amp;nbsp; the division of “mediation” among “transformative”, “evaluative”, “facilitative”, and “adjudicative” mediation. Leaving aside for a moment some of the more eccentric and </atom:summary><link>http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2014/05/conscious-uncoupling-is-most-recent.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Richard Gould-Saltman)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item></channel></rss>