<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 22:57:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Walsh College</category><category>BIT 411</category><category>BIT 337</category><category>BIT 339</category><category>BIT 541</category><category>CIS 2353</category><category>OCC</category><category>BIT 316</category><category>BIT 471</category><category>BIT 476</category><category>BIT 511</category><category>COM 320</category><category>BIT 331</category><category>BIT 526</category><category>BIT 536</category><category>MBA 501</category><category>BIT 342</category><category>BIT 416</category><category>BIT 472</category><category>BIT 301</category><category>BIT 347</category><category>BIT 446</category><category>BIT 551</category><category>QM 301</category><title>Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog</title><description></description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>209</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-6070654860586748890</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-11T13:26:19.583-04:00</atom:updated><title>Laughing out loud</title><description>I was reading an article that &lt;a href=&quot;https://www-secure.walshcollege.edu/Walsh_Blogs/BlogsDetail.aspx?BlogID=569&amp;amp;CatID=&quot;&gt;Dr. Livermore&lt;/a&gt; linked to and almost burst out laughing when I read this line - &quot;Good IT pros are not anti-bureaucracy, as many observers think. They are anti-stupidity.&quot; - Thanks Jeff Ello - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137708/Opinion_The_unspoken_truth_about_managing_geeks?taxonomyId=14&amp;amp;pageNumber=1&quot;&gt;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137708/Opinion_The_unspoken_truth_about_managing_geeks?taxonomyId=14&amp;amp;pageNumber=1&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just had to share...&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/09/laughing-out-loud.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-7829318898408895856</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-17T11:28:22.505-04:00</atom:updated><title>Summer Break</title><description>I decided to take the Summer semester off.  This is my first school-less Summer since 2004.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This Summer I joined my workplace softball league and am spending time at home with my baby girl.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When the Fall semester starts up I&#39;ll try to start posting again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;God bless you all, have a safe and happy Summer!&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/07/summer-break.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-474227335872610472</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-24T23:02:00.075-04:00</atom:updated><title>Games are serious business</title><description>With real money on the line, hacking and cheating in games is serious business.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;there are real, functioning economies in virtual worlds and online games, and that players cash in their virtual goods for real money, to the tune of more than $1 billion a year. - &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-10797_3-10226485-235.html&quot;&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-10797_3-10226485-235.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Gold farming in China is almost an industry now - &lt;a href=&quot;http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article648072.ece&quot;&gt;http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article648072.ece&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/games-are-serious-business.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-7350902064324470233</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-24T22:49:00.844-04:00</atom:updated><title>Do you care</title><description>A &#39;civil liberties attorney&#39; is stirring up drama by saying banks are collecting information about your computer to better protect your account.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any website I go to can capture &#39;time zone, language, browser type, Flash ID, cookie ID and IP address&#39;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I certainly don&#39;t care, do you?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10226742-83.html&quot;&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10226742-83.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/do-you-care.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-6183934110088267967</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-23T21:28:00.217-04:00</atom:updated><title>Appliance-Oriented Architecture</title><description>&lt;span class=&quot;entry-author-name&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://asserttrue.blogspot.com/2009/04/appliance-oriented-architecture.html&quot;&gt;Kas Thomas&lt;/a&gt; put together a good case for the up and coming AOA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am not certain his Q1 2010 date will hold, but I definitely see a movement in the direction of appliances, afterall, who doesn&#39;t love plug and play.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/appliance-oriented-architecture.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-7054582644583504031</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-22T21:29:00.577-04:00</atom:updated><title>Governmental control of the internet</title><description>The &#39;Cybersecurity Act of 2009&#39; may sound like a good idea up front, but in reality it gives the government control of &quot;all networks considered part of the nation&#39;s critical infrastructure&quot; - a.k.a. the Internet&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;The government also would have access to digital data from a vast array of industries including banking,       telecommunications and energy.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;It&#39;s really broad, and there are plenty of laws right now designed to prevent the government       getting access to that kind of data. It&#39;s the same stuff we&#39;ve been fighting on the warrantless wiretapping.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bill would allow the government to create a detailed set of standards for cybersecurity, as well as take over the process of certifying IT technicians. But many in the technology sector say the government is simply ill-equipped to get involved at the technical level, said Franck Journoud, a policy analyst with the Business Software Alliance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Simply put, who has the expertise?&quot; he said. &quot;It&#39;s the industry,       not the government. We have a responsibility to increase and improve security. That responsibility cannot be captured in a       government standard.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Everything about this just screams bad idea...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks to James Osborne for the article - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/21/proposed-heavy-restrictions-internet-freedoms/&quot;&gt;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/21/proposed-heavy-restrictions-internet-freedoms/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/governmental-control-of-internet.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-72857780553353166</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-22T20:45:00.605-04:00</atom:updated><title>Technology innovation using &#39;obsolete&#39; tech</title><description>Putting &#39;obsolete&#39; tech to new use in the fight for literacy, especially in Africa&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B_RK61NI1Q&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?&lt;wbr&gt;v=5B_RK61NI1Q&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/technology-innovation-using-obsolete.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-1264735094212716948</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-21T23:07:00.108-04:00</atom:updated><title>Interesting Biometric security</title><description>Call me a skeptic, but I just don&#39;t see &#39;ear based security&#39; being a big hit anytime soon...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227035.200-our-ears-may-have-builtin-passwords.html&quot;&gt;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227035.200-our-ears-may-have-builtin-passwords.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The idea is definitely interesting though&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/interesting-biometric-security.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-3325615148934696197</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-21T21:19:00.231-04:00</atom:updated><title>Charney&#39;s Theorem</title><description>&quot;there&#39;s always a percentage of the population up to no good.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks to Elinor Mills for the link - &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10223686-83.html&quot;&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10223686-83.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/charneys-theorem.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-1220089109251915038</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-17T09:34:39.159-04:00</atom:updated><title>Good eyes</title><description>Thanks to this guy&#39;s good eyes an ATM card skimmer was removed from an ATM.  I honestly don&#39;t know if I would notice one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks to Chris Walters for the article- &lt;a href=&quot;http://consumerist.com/5200818/reader-finds-card-skimmer-on-bank-atm&quot;&gt;http://consumerist.com/5200818/reader-finds-card-skimmer-on-bank-atm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/good-eyes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-274325161285618417</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-16T22:24:01.090-04:00</atom:updated><title>Time Warner backs down, for now...</title><description>After recently announcing the rollout of the tiered pricing model to more pilot cities, TW backs down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In a statement, TWC made clear isn&#39;t giving up on the idea -- it just lost a public relations battle, saying that it was &quot;shelving the trials while the customer education process continues.&quot; - Thanks to Ryan Singel for the article - &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/04/time-warner-c-1.html&quot;&gt;http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/04/time-warner-c-1.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;I can&#39;t wait for that &#39;customer education&#39;...&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/time-warner-backs-down-for-now.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-1362081898339931625</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-16T21:28:00.188-04:00</atom:updated><title>Digg&#39;s attempt at amends</title><description>Digg is trying to recover from the PR nightmare that the new DiggBar started.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know I won&#39;t be signing up for Digg any time soon...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;In response to the complaints&lt;/span&gt;, Digg plans to tweak the DiggBar to be less intrusive. Those who are &lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;not logged into Digg&lt;/span&gt; and click on a Digg link will not see the toolbar; they&#39;ll be directed straight to the source of content. Also, Digg claims it is ensuring that Digg URLs will not show up in search-engine results.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The DiggBar changes should start to take effect over the next week, according to Quinn.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks to Brian X. Chen for the article - &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/04/diggbar.html&quot;&gt;http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/04/diggbar.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/diggs-attempt-at-amends.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-9197867526763921195</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-15T23:15:01.006-04:00</atom:updated><title>Taxes</title><description>This really motivates me to earn enough money to make it into the top 5th of earners in the US&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The top fifth of households made 56% of pre-tax income in 2006 but paid 86% of all individual income tax revenue collected, according to the most recent data available from the Congressional Budget Office.&lt;/blockquote&gt;It gets even better for the top 1% of earners&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The top 1% of households, which made 19% of pre-tax income, paid 39% of all individual income taxes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Thanks for the post Jeanne Sahadi - &lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/15/pf/taxes/who_pays_most_least/index.htm&quot;&gt;http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/15/pf/taxes/who_pays_most_least/index.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/taxes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-3776782118740176422</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-15T21:51:00.887-04:00</atom:updated><title>Selling trademarks</title><description>I hadn&#39;t thought about it before, but I was recently looking for accounting software and did a Google search for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=peachtree+accounting&quot;&gt;Peachtree Accounting&lt;/a&gt; and saw adds for netsuite.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It turns out, Google allows auctioning of trademarked keywords to the trademark owner&#39;s competitors in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sure, I know enough to know that netsuite is not Peachtree, but considering how Google auctions keywords, this is driving up the cost for Peachtree to advertise to customers looking specifically for their software.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#39;ll have to come out against Google on this one, I don&#39;t think auctioning trademarked keywords to competitors is fair practice.  Especially since Google makes a hefty profit when competitors fight it out for the advertising space...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks to Michael Orey for the article - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc20090414_278741.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc20090414_278741.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/selling-trademarks.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-1756692845676249278</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-14T23:27:00.480-04:00</atom:updated><title>Evil incarnate</title><description>If you have been following the Diggbar scandal, you will enjoy this article.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The practice of presenting another site’s content within a frame served from &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; website has long been hated by web purists, and with good reason: It’s evil.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/The_Diggbar_Is_Evil__Here_s_How_to_Stop_it&quot;&gt;http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/The_Diggbar_Is_Evil__Here_s_How_to_Stop_it&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks Scott Gilbertson&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/evil-incarnate.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-3341745312739877599</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-13T22:30:00.312-04:00</atom:updated><title>The hackable smart grid</title><description>I sure hope the billions of dollars that are being poured into modernizing our electrical infrastructure include a few pennies for IT security...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123914805204099085.html&quot;&gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123914805204099085.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/hackable-smart-grid.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-7982486054889794556</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-13T20:34:00.488-04:00</atom:updated><title>Software rocks</title><description>If you think security cameras are common today, just wait until this new 180 degree camera gets released.  Instead of getting an expensive fancy lens that may distort the image, they took 5 small cameras and turn the separate images into a nice 180 degree panoramic image.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#39;ve seen the software that can turn multiple images into a panoramic, I am jealous I didn&#39;t think to combine it with multiple cheap cameras.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Ingenious programs and a controller chip synchronize the five images as they are received, stitching them simultaneously into a panoramic stream that transmits at 15 frames a second. - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/business/12novel.html&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/business/12novel.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/software-rocks.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-3778423763763569006</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-10T23:27:00.664-04:00</atom:updated><title>Patent idiocy</title><description>I wonder how much time and money gets wasted on ridiculous patents, I&#39;m guessing it is in the billions...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Seriously, patents for a touch screen?  Five year olds build toys out of legos and pretend they are touch screens, the idea isn&#39;t new...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you come up with some great technology to use touch screens, great, go ahead and make a product that uses it and sell it, make your money that way, don&#39;t be a leach that tries to steal money from companies who are selling actual products.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/technology/companies/09apple.html&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/technology/companies/09apple.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/patent-idiocy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-2287896218323023124</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-10T21:24:00.474-04:00</atom:updated><title>How much would you pay for internet access?</title><description>I pay $33 a month for my internet access at home  from Brighthouse, no way am I going to pay $150/month...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Charging customers by the GB use for internet access is ridiculous, the minute my ISP tries to switch to a pay per GB model I am dropping them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am paying for my share of the bandwidth, if Time Warner oversold their bandwidth, that is their problem!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tmp/content-view-41999-118.html&quot;&gt;http://www.tgdaily.com/html_tmp/content-view-41999-118.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-much-would-you-pay-for-internet.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-9086988854958161274</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-08T21:32:00.351-04:00</atom:updated><title>A lesson in anonymity</title><description>A word to the wise, if you don&#39;t want pictures of your house on the internet, don&#39;t make a big scene with the Google StreetView car.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This &#39;affluent&#39; neighborhood only got themselves more attention and more pictures of their houses posted online.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks to Jeff for the link - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www-secure.walshcollege.edu/Walsh_Blogs/BlogsDetail.aspx?CatID=0&amp;amp;BlogID=498&quot;&gt;https://www-secure.walshcollege.edu/Walsh_Blogs/BlogsDetail.aspx?CatID=0&amp;amp;BlogID=498&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1166722/Watch-Broughton-Street-View-fans-plan-descend-privacy-village-photo-fest.html&quot;&gt;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1166722/Watch-Broughton-Street-View-fans-plan-descend-privacy-village-photo-fest.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/lesson-in-anonymity.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-2109307133846219827</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-07T23:59:01.048-04:00</atom:updated><title>When the internet was born</title><description>I was reading Stephen Crocker&#39;s Op-Ed in the New York Times and one particular comment he made struck me. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;It probably helped that in those days we avoided patents and other restrictions; without any financial incentive to control the protocols, it was much easier to reach agreement.&quot; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/opinion/07crocker.html&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/opinion/07crocker.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I stopped and thought for a minute, what would have become of my beloved internet had one of the founders tried to patent some of the core technology?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The whole design and architecture worked because it was open and shared, it was not proprietary and used to gain a profit...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Beautiful&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/when-internet-was-born.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-1689382410978955010</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-08T16:15:58.983-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">MBA 501</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Walsh College</category><title>MBA 501 - Presentation</title><description>My first assignment was to give a presentation that provided a synopsis and highlighted applicable information that can be used by the members of our class.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please note, I take no credit for the material, I merely tried to summarize it in PowerPoint form.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;iframe src=&quot;http://docs.google.com/EmbedSlideshow?docid=dhrwnrb4_216fn2hjqhb&quot; width=&quot;410&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;342&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, you are missing all of my interesting elaboration by viewing only the slides, but I haven&#39;t figured out a good way to record myself giving a presentation in class yet.  Maybe someday...&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/mba-501-presentation.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-6702382565169769431</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-06T21:53:00.286-04:00</atom:updated><title>Another technology that I&#39;ve always wanted</title><description>Motion sensing and voice activated TVs!  Who needs a remote if you can talk to the TV?!?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now all I need is a smart fridge with a robotic delivery system and I&#39;ll never have to get off the couch again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_15/b4126052301939.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_15/b4126052301939.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Technology bliss...&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/another-technology-that-ive-always.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-3963333989111971891</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-03T20:14:00.986-04:00</atom:updated><title>Funny headline</title><description>It is actually an interesting article about professional gaming, but I just love the title&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Virtual Leagues Fold, Forcing Gamers to Find Actual Jobs - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/sports/othersports/02video.html&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/sports/othersports/02video.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Legitimately, you can call the people who get paid to play video games professionals...&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/funny-headline.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9137733902708955981.post-8107919064098847216</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-02T22:35:00.717-04:00</atom:updated><title>Robotic Warehousing</title><description>I&#39;m actually very surprised this hasn&#39;t been a common practice for years, moving around pallets of goods in a warehouse seems like a perfect job for a robot - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-04/st_robotwarehouse&quot;&gt;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-04/st_robotwarehouse&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;&gt;&lt;hr /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;Eric Charnesky&#39;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ericcharnesky.blogspot.com/2009/04/robotic-warehousing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Eric Charnesky)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>