<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Energy Legal Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.energylegalblog.com</link>
	<description>Powered by the attorneys of Bracewell &amp; Giuliani, Energy Legal Blog is your resource for updates and analysis on national and regional energy issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:46:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/EnergyLegalBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="energylegalblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>EnergyLegalBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/EnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>Priority Access on Interconnection Lines:  FERC’s Policy Under Review</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/S1F6KbwNlnA/3928</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/05/21/3928#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ty Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=3928</guid>
		<description>The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission recently issued a Notice of Inquiry seeking comment on whether and/or how FERC should revise its current policy concerning priority rights on interconnection lines that connect generators to the larger transmission grid.  Comments are due on June 11, 2012. While FERC’s present policy generally treats interconnection lines as transmission lines [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/S1F6KbwNlnA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/05/21/3928/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/05/21/3928</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Bracewell &amp; Giuliani Adds Energy Partners from Dewey &amp; LeBoeuf</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/I0qsW9VdITQ/3923</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/05/08/3923#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 19:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle McCormick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy/Cleantech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstream Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=3923</guid>
		<description>Bracewell &amp;#38; Giuliani LLP announced today that five partners, formerly with Dewey &amp;#38; LeBoeuf, will join the firm in its New York, Washington, D.C., and Connecticut offices, effective immediately. The group includes John G. Klauberg, Dewey’s former co-head of the Utilities, Power and Pipelines Global Industry Sector Group, as well as Catherine P. McCarthy, former [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/I0qsW9VdITQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/05/08/3923/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/05/08/3923</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>BLM Releases Proposed Regulations Applicable to Well Stimulation of Oil and Natural Gas Wells on Federal Lands</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/nBUKSRwEyaM/3916</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/05/04/3916#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 18:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Weller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=3916</guid>
		<description>After months of speculation, the U.S. Department of Interior today gave the public its first look at proposed federal regulations that would govern hydraulic fracturing and well stimulation operations by oil and natural gas companies on federal and Indian lands. A 60-day comment period is expected to begin upon publication of the proposal in the Federal [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/nBUKSRwEyaM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/05/04/3916/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/05/04/3916</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies File Rehearing Requests on PJM Western Hub IBT Issue</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/I0G5jnFRF4E/3904</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/04/17/3904#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Perlman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=3904</guid>
		<description>As previously noted in an Energy Legal Blog post on March 19, in an order resolving a complaint filed by DC Energy, LLC and DC Energy Mid‐Atlantic, LLC against PJM Interconnection LLC (PJM), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has ruled that in order for an Internal Bilateral Transaction (IBT) to be “reported to” PJM, [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/I0G5jnFRF4E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/04/17/3904/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/04/17/3904</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Holmstead Discusses EPA’s Proposed NSPS and Prospects for New Power Plants with E&amp;E TV</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/QeZkXHT9GRU/3895</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/04/02/3895#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Weller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality/Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=3895</guid>
		<description>Bracewell &amp;#38; Giuliani partner and former EPA air chief Jeff Holmstead appeared on E&amp;#38;E TV’s OnPoint program to discuss EPA’s proposed New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). Holmstead and E&amp;#38;E TV managing editor Monica Trauzzi also reviewed EPA’s latest air regulation and its probable impacts on the construction of new coal-fired power plants, coal and natural gas [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/QeZkXHT9GRU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/04/02/3895/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/04/02/3895</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Disclosure Exemptions for Fracking Chemicals Under Fire in Wyoming</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/e5vjYrsYhGM/3891</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/27/3891#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Haynie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=3891</guid>
		<description>Since 2010, companies involved in hydraulic fracturing in Wyoming have been subject to disclosure requirements related to the chemicals they use in the fracking process. However, a number of those chemicals have been exempted from disclosure due to their trade secret status. Environmentalists are pushing to chip away at this exemption, but as Jason Hutt, [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/e5vjYrsYhGM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/27/3891/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/27/3891</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Additional Reporting Requirements Imposed on Wholesale Generators by NYPSC with Comments Solicited on Reporting Form</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/mcN_5gqTIAc/3879</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/26/3879#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Rizzo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=3879</guid>
		<description>On March 23, 2012, the New York Public Service Commission (NYPSC) issued an order that imposes a new annual reporting requirement on wholesale electric generators that own generation facilities in New York and certain other electric and gas corporations beginning in 2013 (March 23 Order).  The order solicits comments on the proposed reporting form.  New [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/mcN_5gqTIAc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/26/3879/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/26/3879</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>National Journal Panel Discusses Best Regulatory Environment for Boosting Shale Gas</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/PZu5BQLFTHU/3870</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/22/3870#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Haynie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=3870</guid>
		<description>National Journal hosted a televised half-day briefing in Washington, D.C. on March 20 to discuss the role natural gas production should play in the United States’ energy and economic future. Following keynote conversations with Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Ron Wyden (D-OR), a panel debated the pros and cons of regulating natural gas production on [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/PZu5BQLFTHU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/22/3870/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/22/3870</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FERC Permits Zero Penalties for Minor NERC Infractions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/d-ZyTovJFp0/3862</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/20/3862#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=3862</guid>
		<description>On March 15, 2012, in Docket Nos. RC11-6 et al., FERC issued an order (138 FERC ¶ 61,193) accepting, with limited conditions, NERC’s proposal to use informational filings in a Find, Fix, Track and Report (FFT) spreadsheet to report lesser-risk possible violations of NERC Reliability Standards.  The conditions in FERC’s order apply prospectively and NERC [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/d-ZyTovJFp0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/20/3862/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/20/3862</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FERC Order Appears to Find Most PJM Internal Bilateral Transactions Improper</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/Ga7yA9YjvLM/3857</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/19/3857#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Perlman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=3857</guid>
		<description>In an order resolving a complaint filed by DC Energy, LLC and DC Energy Mid-Atlantic, LLC against PJM Interconnection LLC (PJM),1 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has ruled that in order for an Internal Bilateral Transaction (IBT) to be “reported to” PJM, it must meet a newly clarified physicality test set forth in Section [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/Ga7yA9YjvLM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/19/3857/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2012/03/19/3857</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

