<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Energy Legal Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.energylegalblog.com</link>
	<description>Powered by the attorneys of Bracewell &amp; Giuliani, Energy Legal Blog is your resource for updates and analysis on national and regional energy issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/EnergyLegalBlog" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>EnergyLegalBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/EnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Impediment to In House Attorneys Offering Services to Transmission and Marketing Affiliates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/Qvu39TMb7mw/2364</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/11/05/2364#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Rizzo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2364</guid>
		<description>FERC Order No. 717-A purports to “clarify” FERC&amp;#8217;s Standards of Conduct governing the relationship between transmission providers and their marketing affiliates by limiting the ability of certain utility legal, finance and regulatory employees to serve both the marketing and the transmission sides of the business.  This order, if not stayed, takes effect November 23.
Until this [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/Qvu39TMb7mw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/11/05/2364/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/11/05/2364</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Fifth Circuit Decision Threatens a Tsunami of Climate Change Tort Cases While the Defense Bar Awaits a Circuit Split</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/5dL8rOcILdY/2343</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/22/2343#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Hester</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality/Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2343</guid>
		<description>On October 16, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit revived a lawsuit filed by residents and property owners along the Mississippi Gulf coast against several corporations in the energy, fossil fuels and chemicals industries alleging that the defendants were responsible for property damage caused by Hurricane Katrina.  Comer v. Murphy Oil [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/5dL8rOcILdY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/22/2343/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/22/2343</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>No Longer Whether, but Only How Will US Choose To Control Greenhouse Gas Emissions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/_DJCLnLDlNQ/2336</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/16/2336#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colette Fozard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality/Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2336</guid>
		<description>Both the US Senate and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on September 30 moved ahead with programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  Which program goes into effect will determine whether those emissions are controlled pursuant to a nationwide cap-and-trade program that ratchets them down approximately 80 percent below 2005 levels by 2050 or, at least initially, [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/_DJCLnLDlNQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/16/2336/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/16/2336</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>US v. Radley Pares Enforcement Authority Under the Commodities Exchange Act </title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/12ovqy5UqbE/2327</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/06/2327#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew McLain</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized Markets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2327</guid>
		<description>The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas dismissed a twenty-six-count indictment that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and Justice Department had brought against four former BP traders for allegedly attempting to manipulate the TET propane market in 2004 in violation of the Commodities Exchange Act (CEA). In doing so, the court appears to have [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/12ovqy5UqbE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/06/2327/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/06/2327</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Industry Awaits Obama Administration Decisions on Offshore Oil Exploration</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/xne8--c5BYE/2316</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/01/2316#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2316</guid>
		<description>On September 21, the comment period ended for the Department of the Interior&amp;#8217;s Draft Proposed Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Leasing Program for 2010-2015 (DPP).  The DPP would replace the current program covering 2007-2012.  With President Bush&amp;#8217;s removal of the Executive withdrawal on offshore oil and gas exploration, along with Congress&amp;#8217; allowing its [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/xne8--c5BYE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/01/2316/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/10/01/2316</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Issues Final Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/nrGIObJ_eh8/2292</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/30/2292#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kosar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Quality/Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2292</guid>
		<description>EPA&amp;#8217;s new GHG Inventory Rule is now final and will require prompt attention by many business sectors to help ensure compliance effective January 2010.  The rule establishes the most sweeping monitoring and reporting regime in memory and will serve as the basis for future policies and legislation aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Companies and large [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/nrGIObJ_eh8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/30/2292/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/30/2292</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>NIST Seeks Public Comment on Smart Grid Framework</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/nJ4weaUMmjE/2283</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/29/2283#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2283</guid>
		<description>The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of the US Department of Commerce on September 24 released its first round of almost 80 draft &amp;#8220;Smart Grid&amp;#8221; standards, which are intended to establish a framework for Smart Grid development.  These initial standards establish a conceptual model for the Smart Grid by (1) addressing how the [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/nJ4weaUMmjE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/29/2283/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/29/2283</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>State Regulators Continue Battles Against Federally-Approved Capacity Markets Despite Recent Setbacks</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/B0MNRWOJec0/2249</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/22/2249#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew McLain</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2249</guid>
		<description>Maryland and New Jersey&amp;#8217;s state utility boards August 24 petitioned the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to review FERC’s approval of PJM&amp;#8217;s initial Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) capacity auctions. The state regulators, joined by more than a dozen other petitioners, argued before FERC that &amp;#8220;[t]he absence of price discipline provided by new [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/B0MNRWOJec0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/22/2249/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/22/2249</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Apex Oil: Environmental Cleanup Liability Survives Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/VqW6mevwN0E/2235</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/22/2235#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kosar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2235</guid>
		<description>In U.S. v. Apex Oil, a three-judge panel of the Seventh Circuit ruled 3-0 that EPA’s cleanup injunction against the corporate successor to a chemical company was not discharged in Chapter 11 because the injunction does not create a right to payment and, consequently, is not a ‘debt’ under the Bankruptcy Code.
In essence, Apex had [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/VqW6mevwN0E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/22/2235/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/22/2235</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Seeks Comment on Smart Grid Technologies</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/8wlg3KgEqWY/2229</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/18/2229#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2229</guid>
		<description>The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 directed the Federal Communications Commission to develop a National Broadband Plan. To help develop that plan, the FCC has requested comment on how advanced telecommunications services and infrastructure, and broadband in particular, can help implement Smart Grid technology.
In its request, the Commission recognizes Smart Grid as a [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/8wlg3KgEqWY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/18/2229/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/09/18/2229</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
