<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Energy Legal Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.energylegalblog.com</link>
	<description>Powered by the attorneys of Bracewell &amp; Giuliani, Energy Legal Blog is your resource for updates and analysis on national and regional energy issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:32:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/EnergyLegalBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="energylegalblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>EnergyLegalBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/EnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>Second [Annual] Oil &amp; Gas Regulatory Symposium</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/IqaqMeHB9vs/4578</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/23/4578#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bracewell &amp; Giuliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstream Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=4578</guid>
		<description>Bracewell &amp;#38; Giuliani will hold its Second [Annual] Oil &amp;#38; Gas Regulatory Symposium in Houston on October 9, 2013. Like the 2012 symposium, this year&amp;#8217;s event will feature speakers from industry and from within the Firm. Bracewell speakers will include Rudy Giuliani and former Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison. Details about the symposium will be made [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/IqaqMeHB9vs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/23/4578/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/23/4578</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>DOE Approves LNG Export Authorization for Freeport LNG – A Win for LNG Exports?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/YNRcWmEDw8U/4574</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/22/4574#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bracewell &amp; Giuliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=4574</guid>
		<description>The Department of Energy recently authorized Freeport LNG Expansion, L.P. (“FLEX”) to export LNG to non-Free Trade Agreement countries. Importantly, this is the first order on LNG exports issued by the DOE since it collected comments on its two-part LNG Export Study and likely represents the analysis DOE will use in reviewing the queue of [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/YNRcWmEDw8U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/22/4574/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/22/4574</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Changes in ISO-NE’s Day-Ahead Energy Market Schedule To Take Effect Next Week</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/y3_qusKfWzc/4571</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/16/4571#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bracewell &amp; Giuliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=4571</guid>
		<description>ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) last week notified the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that its new day-ahead energy market schedule will become effective on May 23, 2013. In late April, FERC issued an order accepting modifications to ISO-NE’s market rules to provide for earlier clearing of the day-ahead energy market and earlier completion of [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/y3_qusKfWzc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/16/4571/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/16/4571</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Shippers Rolling the Dice to Gain Oil Pipeline Capacity</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/tR6FAZPmAk0/4568</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/15/4568#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bracewell &amp; Giuliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=4568</guid>
		<description>With the growing capacity constraints on oil pipelines, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) has recently extended the bounds of what it considers acceptable methods of apportioning limited capacity. In Seaway Crude Pipeline Company LLC, 143 FERC ¶ 61,036 (2013), the Commission approved a new lottery system that will select, at random, new shippers who [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/tR6FAZPmAk0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/15/4568/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/15/4568</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Circuit Affirms FERC ROE Policy But Reverses For Failure to Apply APA Official Notice Rule</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/SAiV0scuuJ0/4563</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/10/4563#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 21:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bracewell &amp; Giuliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=4563</guid>
		<description>The D.C. Circuit’s remand today of a FERC transmission incentive rate of return order relating to Southern California Edison Company (“SoCal Edison”) is less interesting for its affirmance of the Commission’s rate of return methodology, than it is for its remand based on FERC’s misuse of the official notice provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/SAiV0scuuJ0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/10/4563/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/10/4563</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hydraulic Fracturing Bans: New York Appellate Court Affirms Zoning Bans at the Local Level</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/IJaOrivCA7o/4551</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/03/4551#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 19:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bracewell &amp; Giuliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstream Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=4551</guid>
		<description>In New York, municipalities can more effectively seek to “zone out” oil and gas operations by passing zoning ordinances. An appellate panel of the New York Supreme Court affirmed the decision of a lower court, holding local municipalities have the power to enact zoning ordinances that ban “all activities related to the exploration for, and the production [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/IJaOrivCA7o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/03/4551/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/05/03/4551</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Shoneman to Speak on Upcoming LSI Telebriefing</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/VkCdKdZXTGs/4542</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/04/17/4542#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bracewell &amp; Giuliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=4542</guid>
		<description>On April 23, 2013, Partner Chuck Shoneman will speak on a panel at Law Seminars International telebriefing on the topic of “New Ruling on FERC’s Anti-Manipulation Authority,” discussing the impact of the D.C. Circuit’s recent decision in FERC v. Brian Hunter. Call in from anywhere! 10-11 am Pacific/1-2 pm Eastern. For more information please click [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/VkCdKdZXTGs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/04/17/4542/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/04/17/4542</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Pipelines for Energy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/9od7LtoJKyg/4534</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/04/02/4534#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bracewell &amp; Giuliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=4534</guid>
		<description>Mark Lewis, Managing Partner of Bracewell &amp;#38; Giuliani’s Washington, D.C. office, and associate George Fatula recently discussed the demand for new pipeline development and changes to existing infrastructure in an article for Energy &amp;#38; Infrastructure. In addition to shifts in production areas, Mark and George also provide insight on the challenges facing pipeline developers with [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/9od7LtoJKyg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/04/02/4534/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/04/02/4534</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FERC Punts on Closely Watched Request to Order a Shale Oil Pipeline Interconnection</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/zmNvyxKXR3Q/4524</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/03/29/4524#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kosar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstream Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=4524</guid>
		<description>In an order issued on March 22, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) once again declined to require an interstate oil pipeline to grant an interconnection requested by another pipeline.  The order, issued in response to a complaint by High Prairie Pipeline, LLC (“High Prairie”) against Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership (“Enbridge”), culminated a closely-watched case [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/zmNvyxKXR3Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/03/29/4524/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/03/29/4524</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Fee Relief:  FERC Agrees to No Longer Assess Annual Charges to Projects Subject to Power Site Reservations</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/D6iSi55qx0Q/4519</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/03/25/4519#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bracewell &amp; Giuliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy/Cleantech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=4519</guid>
		<description>On March 21, 2013, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) granted the petition of a group of hydroelectric licensees, calling themselves the Power Site Reservation Fee Group, declaring that FERC will not assess annual land use charges pursuant to Section 10(e)(1) of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”), 16 U.S.C. § 803(e)(1), for lands owned by [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/D6iSi55qx0Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/03/25/4519/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2013/03/25/4519</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
