By Mitch Wagner, InformationWeek

Health information technology (HIT) is the fastest growing segment of the $1 trillion global health care marketplace, and is poised to continue its impressive growth through 2013, according to a study released Tuesday.

The health IT marketplace is showing 11% combined annual growth rate, which is likely to continue over the next four years, according to a study from Scientia Advisors, a management consulting firm.

To remain competitive, vendors must take into account government incentives, requirements for clinical decision-making and electronic health record systems, and emerging competitors in Asia and elsewhere in the developing world, the study said.

Health information technology will grow from 4% of the worldwide health care products market to 5% — a 25% increase in HIT market share, Scientia said.

HIT spending in the US will focus on inpatient and outpatient electronic health records systems, at the expense of specialty and departmental information systems and other capital investments, Scientia said.

“Leading players with large installed bases, proven products, and streamlined routes to meaningful use of EHRs are likely to gain share,” Scientia said.

Some small hospitals may choose lower risk, lower cost approaches such as remote hosting. Given the economic slowdown, vendors will lend hospitals capital to finance HIT investments.

“Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) will likely have a profound impact on clinical diagnostics and therapeutics,” Scientia said.

Also, “over the long term, disruptive innovations such as open source software and ’software as a service’ could lead to dramatically lower pricing,” the company said.

Above article published on http://www.informationweek.com/news/healthcare/EMR/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221601057&subSection=News

When Dr. Henry Plummer developed the concept of the “unit record” nearly 100 years ago, his idea was to place all of a patient’s records in a single file that traveled with the patient and could be stored in a central repository. His concept of medical care continuity quickly became the standard for medical record keeping worldwide.

I wonder what Dr. Plummer would make of today’s adoption of electronic medical records (EMR) by U.S. health care providers? After all, the concept is basically the same, just expanded to take advantage of today’s capacious electronic storage and retrieval methods.

Even the federal government has gotten into the act, defining a complete EMR system as containing four basic functions: computerized orders for prescriptions, computerized orders for tests, reporting of test results and physician notes.

In a perfect world, an EMR system tracks a patient’s entire health and medical history in a computerized, electronic format that is accessible wherever the patient is. These records are more easily retrievable than manual systems, and can make a patient’s navigation through the health care system much safer and more efficient.

But it’s hardly a perfect world. Even though the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 has made the promotion of a national, interoperable health information system a priority, EMRs have not been adopted nearly as quickly in the U.S. as one might expect. Issues, including the high cost, lack of standardization, security and privacy have stood in the way of implementation.

A recent study from the New England Journal of Medicine points out that hospital EMR adoption rates are still abysmal, concluding that only about 8 percent of the 3,000 hospitals studied by researchers used even a basic EMR in a single unit, which included nurse or physician notes. And only 1.5 percent of non-federal U.S. facilities use a comprehensive EMR.

This seems counter-intuitive, especially when one considers the numerous advantages of EMRs, starting with efficiency. Information stored in an electronic format can be retrieved easily at the touch of a button or the click of a mouse. Search and retrieval times are a fraction of what they would be in manual systems. At the very least, this saves time by eliminating the need to complete the old manual medical history forms at a new physician’s office. This also reduces the chance for error when a patient forgets to list certain prescribed medications or supplements. It’s all there in one easily accessible record.

But efficiency isn’t the only benefit. For patients, access to good care becomes easier and safer when records can easily be shared. Important information — such as blood type, prescribed drugs, medical conditions and other medical history aspects — can be accounted for much more quickly. Doctors and other medical personnel can retrieve these medical records from anywhere using handheld devices like an iPhone, which allows them to continue treatment no matter where they are. And, in case of emergency, information can be shared with emergency room physicians who can then order diagnostic tests and share results online.

Another benefit is safety. It’s estimated that nearly 98,000 patients die annually by preventable medical errors of some type. It’s entirely possible that these numbers could be greatly reduced by a comprehensive medical history information generated through an EMR system.

The Mayo Clinic is setting the standard for EMR implementation. With one of the largest such systems in the world, all medical documentation relating to a patient’s care – physician notes, laboratory reports, surgical dictations, copies of correspondence, appointment schedules, X-rays, ultrasounds, CT and MRI scans, echocardiograms – is instantly available to caregivers via more than 16,000 computer terminals on Mayo’s three campuses. The efficiencies created by simply typing a few identifying keystrokes to retrieve a patient’s record saves a doctor’s practice or a hospital many thousands of dollars. That’s even taking the cost of the electronic system into account.

Even the federal government thinks electronic record keeping is important. Veterans’ hospitals across the country share an electronic system called VistA, which shares records of veterans in its health system. Should a patient find him or herself in a VA hospital, even away from home, the hospital will have the same access to his or her records that the hometown hospital does.

It’s interesting to note that a recent report from PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Health Research Institute contends that Medicaid penalties might do more to boost EMR adoption than incentives, like available funding to physicians to purchase and implement EMRs. According to the report, “Provisions in the stimulus law that call for cuts in Medicare reimbursements, rather than a multibillion-dollar incentive program, will do more to push the adoption of electronic medical records among hospitals and doctor practices by 2015.”

However EMR adoption happens, it’s critical that it happen sooner rather than later. The health care industry’s ability to provide efficient, coordinated, safe and high-quality care is only enhanced by the rapid availability of accurate data. And with the availability of solid data, researchers can also use the EMR to analyze large amounts of patient information more efficiently, speeding the application of new research findings and vastly improving patient care in the future.

Just as Dr. Plummer saw beyond the information exchange limitations of his era, we can see the benefits of using the latest technologies for the practice of continuity in 21st century medicine. But the goal, just as it was in Dr. Plummer’s time, or even going as far back as Hippocrates and his famous oath, is still nobly laudable: “First, do no harm.”

Above article published on http://www.fwbusinesspress.com/display.php?id=11302

The health IT provisions of the stimulus package increased fines for health care organizations that experience a breach of protected health data.

The interim final rule will take effect Nov. 30. HHS said it will consider public comments on the rule until Dec. 29 (Monegain, Healthcare IT News, 11/2).

Rule Details

In its interim rule, HHS described four categories of health data security violations:

• Did not know;
• Reasonable cause;
• Willful neglect that was corrected; and
• Willful neglect that was not corrected.

The rule establishes financial penalties ranging from $100 to $50,000 for each violation. It also sets a maximum yearly penalty of $1.5 million for all violations of an identical provision (Goedert, Health Data Management, 10/30).

Under the new rule, a health care organization can no longer avoid penalties for not knowing about a violation unless it fixes the problem within 30 days of identifying it (Mosquera, Government Health IT, 10/30).

Enforcement Still Unclear

The interim rule does not amend any of the HIPAA enforcement provisions included in the federal stimulus package.

Although the stimulus package calls for “periodic audits” to ensure HIPAA compliance, HHS has yet to release specific details about its audit and enforcement plans (Nicastro, HealthLeaders Media, 10/30).

The interim rule suggests that HHS will release further details about HIPAA enforcement during subsequent rulemaking

Above article published on http://www.ihealthbeat.org/articles/2009/11/2/hhs-releases-interim-final-rule-strengthening-hipaa-penalties.aspx

EMRs might be able to give early warning about patients who are at risk for domestic abuse, new research suggests. A study published in BMJ (formerly the British Medical Journal) this week found that data from well-populated EMRs were able to predict future diagnoses of injuries and assaults that could indicate domestic abuse 10 to 30 months in advance.

Researchers from Harvard Medical School analyzed more than half a million de-identified electronic records that contained at least four years of data on adult patients and developed a scoring system based on risk factors for abuse, including alcoholism, ER visits for injuries, depression and psychosis. “Our model predicted abuse two years before it appeared on medical records,” lead author Ben Reis, an informatics specialist, told the Boston Globe.

Reis’ research team will expand their work to other health problems in hopes of creating a screening-support system that could be integrated into EMR systems in the future. “With increasing amounts of data becoming available, this work has the potential to bring closer the vision of predictive medicine, where vast quantities of information are used to predict individuals’ future medical risks in order to improve medical care and diagnosis,” he said, according to Health Imaging & IT.

Above article published on http://www.fierceemr.com/story/emrs-could-be-key-future-predictive-medicine/2009-10-01#ixzz0VybkiMHw

“Other businesses have been able to figure out how to make it work, such as the finance business. You can get money wherever you go. Health care is really behind,” said Helen Connors, executive director for Kansas University Center for Health Informatics.

Connors said it is unreasonable to ask patients to recall their medications and past history every time they see a doctor.

“Why are we asking the patient for that information? We can’t rely on the patients or providers to remember everything, so it’s got to change,” she said. “I think eventually consumers are going to drive it because they are not going to put up with it.”

The federal government has earmarked $34 billion in stimulus funds to address the issue.

“That’s a lot of money,” said Dave Garets, CEO and president of HIMSS Analytics, which collects and analyzes health care data related to information technology. “The federal government has never allocated much of any money to provide incentives to hospitals and doctors to get in gear. But boy, they did this time.”

The goal is to offer incentives for health care providers to move from paper charts to computers during the next five years, and after 2015 penalize those who don’t by, for example, providing lower reimbursements for Medicare patients.

Congress is working on the details with some preliminary regulations expected by year’s end, Garets said.

High-tech advantages

The ultimate goal is for doctors, hospitals and pharmacies to be able to access any patient’s information in a more efficient and timely manner by using electronic medical records, commonly called EMRs.

For example, if an out-of-town patient is taken to an emergency room and has allergies, an EMR would immediately alert the physician. EMRs also allow doctors to order and see lab results at the click of a button. Research has shown that EMRs significantly reduce medical errors.

For example, they can alert a doctor if he or she prescribes a medication that would not interact well with a current medication. EMR prescriptions also are more legible than their hand-written counterparts. Dr. Jon White, health information technology director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, said EMRs can help doctors manage more information better and more quickly. An EMR can contain patients’ medical information, lab work, the latest research in health, insurance information, pharmaceutical data and messages from other office workers, to name a few applications. “You can still practice without those tools, and in fact, people do every day. It just becomes more challenging to do it as time goes by,” he said.

High-cost process

White said doctors and hospitals have been dragging their heels on changing over to EMRs primarily because of costs. “They are expensive. But, we think that they will get back the money that they put into it,” he said. “Ultimately, everyone who successfully implements electronic medical records say they would never go back, but that’s a big hurdle to get over.”

The agency estimates that it costs about $30,000 for a provider that isn’t in a hospital setting.

Lawrence Memorial Hospital and Kansas University both started moving to an electronic system several years ago. LMH has spent more than $12 million just for software. KU Hospital has budgeted $52 million for the entire process.

“It’s probably one of the largest single activities that any hospital will pursue,” said Chris Hansen, chief information officer at KU Hospital. “It’s monumental, which is why there haven’t been a lot of hospitals that have gotten there.”

According to a 2008 survey in the New England Journal of Medicine, only 4 percent of physicians reported having an extensive, fully functional electronic records system and 13 percent had a basic system.

Hospitals are doing better.

Garets, of HIMSS Analytics, said 83 percent of hospitals nationwide have a basic system, but in Kansas, only 62 percent of the 132 hospitals do. More startling, he said, is that 29 percent — or 38 — of the state’s hospitals have no basic system and have no plans to purchase one, compared with 12 percent nationally.

“That is craziness,” Garets said, laughing. “It’s like what, ‘Are you living under a rock?’”

Connors, of KU’s Center for Health Informatics, is chairwoman of the state’s new e-Health Advisory Council, which is working to recommend a health information exchange plan for the state. She said some states already have a plan and are applying for federal money to begin implementing those plans. However, Kansas is applying for funding to develop a plan.

“Right now, we are fact-finding, looking at what other states have done, what do we need and what is going to be best for Kansas,” she said.

The first mission is to help health professionals get electronic systems and then figure out how they can exchange that information. Ultimately, the state’s systems will plug into a national one.

Learning curve

But, change isn’t easy.

“Almost every single one of us that is out there now grew up writing words on charts, writing notes on charts and using a pen,” White said. “Until not too long ago, we were taught that the pen was the mightiest instrument available to a doctor.”

Dr. Sabrina Prewett, 54, medical director in the LMH Emergency Department, would agree. In January, the emergency room will be one of few nationwide that is paperless.

“It was very challenging,” Prewett said of the five-year process. She worked alongside IT personnel to implement the software and then helped train staff.

“That’s why I became the one that helped develop it because if I can do it — anybody can do it,” she said, laughing.

But, Prewett said it has been worthwhile. It is safer, quicker and the information is legible.

“The impetus is for patient safety,” she said.

Above article published on http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2009/nov/02/health-industry-finally-moving-toward-computerized/?city_local

When Dr. Henry Plummer developed the concept of the “unit record” nearly 100 years ago, his idea was to place all of a patient’s records in a single file that traveled with the patient and could be stored in a central repository. His concept of medical care continuity quickly became the standard for medical record keeping worldwide.

I wonder what Dr. Plummer would make of today’s adoption of electronic medical records (EMR) by U.S. health care providers? After all, the concept is basically the same, just expanded to take advantage of today’s capacious electronic storage and retrieval methods.

Even the federal government has gotten into the act, defining a complete EMR system as containing four basic functions: computerized orders for prescriptions, computerized orders for tests, reporting of test results and physician notes.

In a perfect world, an EMR system tracks a patient’s entire health and medical history in a computerized, electronic format that is accessible wherever the patient is. These records are more easily retrievable than manual systems, and can make a patient’s navigation through the health care system much safer and more efficient.

But it’s hardly a perfect world. Even though the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 has made the promotion of a national, interoperable health information system a priority, EMRs have not been adopted nearly as quickly in the U.S. as one might expect. Issues, including the high cost, lack of standardization, security and privacy have stood in the way of implementation.

A recent study from the New England Journal of Medicine points out that hospital EMR adoption rates are still abysmal, concluding that only about 8 percent of the 3,000 hospitals studied by researchers used even a basic EMR in a single unit, which included nurse or physician notes. And only 1.5 percent of non-federal U.S. facilities use a comprehensive EMR.

This seems counter-intuitive, especially when one considers the numerous advantages of EMRs, starting with efficiency. Information stored in an electronic format can be retrieved easily at the touch of a button or the click of a mouse. Search and retrieval times are a fraction of what they would be in manual systems. At the very least, this saves time by eliminating the need to complete the old manual medical history forms at a new physician’s office. This also reduces the chance for error when a patient forgets to list certain prescribed medications or supplements. It’s all there in one easily accessible record.

But efficiency isn’t the only benefit. For patients, access to good care becomes easier and safer when records can easily be shared. Important information — such as blood type, prescribed drugs, medical conditions and other medical history aspects — can be accounted for much more quickly. Doctors and other medical personnel can retrieve these medical records from anywhere using handheld devices like an iPhone, which allows them to continue treatment no matter where they are. And, in case of emergency, information can be shared with emergency room physicians who can then order diagnostic tests and share results online.

Another benefit is safety. It’s estimated that nearly 98,000 patients die annually by preventable medical errors of some type. It’s entirely possible that these numbers could be greatly reduced by a comprehensive medical history information generated through an EMR system.

The Mayo Clinic is setting the standard for EMR implementation. With one of the largest such systems in the world, all medical documentation relating to a patient’s care – physician notes, laboratory reports, surgical dictations, copies of correspondence, appointment schedules, X-rays, ultrasounds, CT and MRI scans, echocardiograms – is instantly available to caregivers via more than 16,000 computer terminals on Mayo’s three campuses. The efficiencies created by simply typing a few identifying keystrokes to retrieve a patient’s record saves a doctor’s practice or a hospital many thousands of dollars. That’s even taking the cost of the electronic system into account.

Even the federal government thinks electronic record keeping is important. Veterans’ hospitals across the country share an electronic system called VistA, which shares records of veterans in its health system. Should a patient find him or herself in a VA hospital, even away from home, the hospital will have the same access to his or her records that the hometown hospital does.

It’s interesting to note that a recent report from PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Health Research Institute contends that Medicaid penalties might do more to boost EMR adoption than incentives, like available funding to physicians to purchase and implement EMRs. According to the report, “Provisions in the stimulus law that call for cuts in Medicare reimbursements, rather than a multibillion-dollar incentive program, will do more to push the adoption of electronic medical records among hospitals and doctor practices by 2015.”

However EMR adoption happens, it’s critical that it happen sooner rather than later. The health care industry’s ability to provide efficient, coordinated, safe and high-quality care is only enhanced by the rapid availability of accurate data. And with the availability of solid data, researchers can also use the EMR to analyze large amounts of patient information more efficiently, speeding the application of new research findings and vastly improving patient care in the future.

Just as Dr. Plummer saw beyond the information exchange limitations of his era, we can see the benefits of using the latest technologies for the practice of continuity in 21st century medicine. But the goal, just as it was in Dr. Plummer’s time, or even going as far back as Hippocrates and his famous oath, is still nobly laudable: “First, do no harm.”

Dr. Scott Ransom is president and professor in obstetrics, gynecology, health management and policy at the University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth.

Above article published on http://www.fwbusinesspress.com/display.php?id=11302

Special to the Mercury News

Patients in the Kaiser Permanente San Jose Hospital are seeing something new when a physician or nurse visits their rooms. The doctors and nurses themselves aren’t different; they continue to provide their patients with superior care and service.

But a piece of equipment they bring with them — a wheeled cart with a computer screen on top — is a significant difference, and it’s an example of what will help dramatically improve health care in America.

The cart-borne computer is wirelessly connected to a huge database containing the medical history of our members, as well as the latest recommended treatments for a wide range of medical conditions. The database contains all outpatient and inpatient visit information, diagnostic images such as X-rays and mammograms, allergies, specialists’ notes, lab tests and prescriptions. And it is all part of KP HealthConnect, the largest nongovernmental electronic medical record (EMR) system in the United States.

Electronic medical records are a cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s health reform effort, and as part of his effort to stimulate the economy, he has dedicated some $19 billion to make EMRs a national reality.

Why? Electronic medical records improve the quality of care. A fully functional EMR system gives physicians, nurses and technicians a patient’s comprehensive medical history at the point of care, whether it’s in the doctor’s office, the emergency room or in a skilled nursing facility. It is also remotely accessible for specialists and others who are on call, allowing them to make informed decisions that expedite patient care.

EMRs have the potential to increase efficiency and contain costs by reducing duplication and improving patient safety, and they do this by harnessing the incredible power of computers — their ability to calculate, to network, to automatically check facts and to provide targeted research results — and applying that power to medical care.

In health care systems with fully implemented electronic medical records, physicians and nurses no longer need to spend valuable time looking through several files for paper records that are often incomplete.

Now, for example, emergency department physicians with a fully functional EMR system can see a patient’s previous hospitalizations, medications and diagnoses when that patient shows up complaining of chest pains. That means treatment can begin more quickly and success is more likely.

Medication is safer, too: Prescriptions written by physicians using the EMR system are spell-checked and legible, and the computer automatically combs the patient’s history for potentially dangerous drug interactions and alerts the doctor.

In the hospital, medications are bar-coded and scanned at bedside to help ensure the right patient is getting the right drug in the right dose at the right time.

Of course, EMRs should not be a one-way street. In integrated health care systems, patients can use their home computers to increase convenience by making appointments online, ordering prescription refills that are delivered to their home, viewing their lab results through secure Web pages, and e-mailing their physicians — all at no additional cost.

Last year, thanks to these online tools tied to EMRs, Kaiser Permanente members had 6 million e-visits without using a gallon of gas.

Notes jotted on paper and placed in multiple files where doctors rarely see them are a remnant of a fragmented, inefficient model of medical care. In the 21st century, Americans expect — and deserve — more.

Dr. Raj Bhandari is physician-in-chief and Terry L. Austen is senior vice president and area manager for Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center. They wrote this article for the Mercury News

Above article published on http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_13534802

By Pamela Lewis Dolan, amednews staff.

One of the biggest untapped benefits of electronic medical record adoption is the secondary uses of the data that are being collected, concludes a study by PricewaterhouseCoopers.

The study, “Transforming Healthcare through Secondary Use of Health Data,” found that practices and hospitals have seen aggregated data from their electronic medical records identify patterns that have allowed them to improve outcomes, reduce errors and increase revenue opportunities.

But the number of institutions using the aggregated, or secondary, data in this way is very small, though it is expected to grow in the next two years.

“Almost every constituent in the [health care] industry that has to make a decision around what type of health care to deliver and when could use this kind of data and the information that aggregating it can produce,” said Dan Garrett, health IT practice leader at PricewaterhouseCoopers.

The report found that among those organizations already using some form of secondary data, 59% have seen quality improvements, 42% have achieved cost savings, 36% have seen patient/member satisfaction improve, and 29% have increased revenue. The biggest users of secondary data are hospitals and physicians, while health plans are the farthest behind.

The survey found that although 95% of physicians are not opposed to using secondary data, many are sensitive to how it should be used. Patients also are concerned.

“We all know we need to use this data, but they also know we can’t risk security,” Garrett said.

The PricewaterhouseCoopers report came from an e-mail survey conducted in June of 732 health care executives, 482 physicians, 136 payers and 114 pharmacy/life sciences organizations.

Above article published on http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2009/10/19/bise1023.htm

More than three-quarters of healthcare executives surveyed by PricewaterhouseCoopers say that information contained in EMRs could become their most valuable asset over the next five years as “secondary use” of EMR data takes off. But this won’t happen until technology improves, more standards get harmonized and, most importantly, the healthcare industry resolves lingering privacy concerns, according to a PwC survey released early this morning.

With billions of dollars in federal health IT stimulus funds set to flow into healthcare in the next few years, secondary use of electronic health data will “grow exponentially,” PwC says, citing a finding that 65 percent of healthcare executives expect their data-mining activity to spike within two years. About 90 percent of respondents believe that secondary use of EMR data will help their organizations make significant improvement to the quality of care.

There may be some legal barriers to overcome, however, before healthcare organizations can unleash the full power of patient-specific healthcare data. Also of concern to healthcare executives are privacy implications of data mining and the bad PR that could result from unauthorized use. This study literally just hit the wires, but we can’t wait to hear Dr. Deborah Peel’s thoughts on this last point.

Above article published on http://www.fierceemr.com/story/healthcare-execs-see-emr-data-their-most-valuable-asset/2009-10-01#ixzz0VEq13Kan

By Pamela Lewis Dolan, amednews staff,

One of the biggest untapped benefits of electronic medical record adoption is the secondary uses of the data that are being collected, concludes a study by PricewaterhouseCoopers.

The study, “Transforming Healthcare through Secondary Use of Health Data,” found that practices and hospitals have seen aggregated data from their electronic medical records identify patterns that have allowed them to improve outcomes, reduce errors and increase revenue opportunities.

But the number of institutions using the aggregated, or secondary, data in this way is very small, though it is expected to grow in the next two years.

“Almost every constituent in the [health care] industry that has to make a decision around what type of health care to deliver and when could use this kind of data and the information that aggregating it can produce,” said Dan Garrett, health IT practice leader at PricewaterhouseCoopers.

The report found that among those organizations already using some form of secondary data, 59% have seen quality improvements, 42% have achieved cost savings, 36% have seen patient/member satisfaction improve, and 29% have increased revenue. The biggest users of secondary data are hospitals and physicians, while health plans are the farthest behind.

The survey found that although 95% of physicians are not opposed to using secondary data, many are sensitive to how it should be used. Patients also are concerned.

“We all know we need to use this data, but they also know we can’t risk security,” Garrett said.

The PricewaterhouseCoopers report came from an e-mail survey conducted in June of 732 health care executives, 482 physicians, 136 payers and 114 pharmacy/life sciences organizations.

Above article published on http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2009/10/19/bise1023.htm