<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Decoupling Seattle Family Law and Divorce Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://decouplingblog.com</link>
	<description>Explaining and Discussing Washington Family Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:44:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Decoupling" /><feedburner:info uri="decoupling" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Can I File a Joint Return After I’ve Filed for Divorce?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Decoupling/~3/ocz7MOfZhio/</link>
		<comments>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/03/can-i-file-a-joint-return-after-ive-filed-for-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask a Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing jointly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decouplingblog.com/?p=3619</guid>
		<description>&lt;h3&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Question&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My husband and I split up at the end of September.  He says that we can&amp;#8217;t file a joint tax return, because we are living apart and I have already filed for divorce.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He thinks that he will be better off by filing separately.  But I still have taxes withheld from my pay checks based on a joint return. &amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Decoupling/~4/ocz7MOfZhio" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/03/can-i-file-a-joint-return-after-ive-filed-for-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/03/can-i-file-a-joint-return-after-ive-filed-for-divorce/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Interests of the Child – The Wishes of the Child and the Schedules of the Parents</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Decoupling/~3/o6EET2lRLI4/</link>
		<comments>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-the-wishes-of-the-child-and-the-schedules-of-the-parents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting plan.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCW 26.09.187]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential schedule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decouplingblog.com/?p=3587</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In this series, we have been examining Washington cases which help us to understand what exactly the “&lt;a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=26.09.002');" href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=26.09.002"&gt;best interests of the child&lt;/a&gt;” standard means, and how it works when applied to a specific family.  Our &lt;a href="http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-relationship-with-siblings-and-other-significant-adults/"&gt;last article&lt;/a&gt; examined the fifth factor under &lt;a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=26.09.187"&gt;RCW 26.09.187(3)(a)&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#8211; &amp;#8220;the child&amp;#8217;s relationship with siblings and other adults, as well as&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Decoupling/~4/o6EET2lRLI4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-the-wishes-of-the-child-and-the-schedules-of-the-parents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-the-wishes-of-the-child-and-the-schedules-of-the-parents/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Interests of the Child – Relationship with Siblings and Other Significant Adults</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Decoupling/~3/t3Qkh0QmOes/</link>
		<comments>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-relationship-with-siblings-and-other-significant-adults/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting plan.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCW 26.09.187]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decouplingblog.com/?p=3544</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In this series, we’re reviewing Washington cases which help us to understand what exactly the “&lt;a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=26.09.002');" href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=26.09.002"&gt;best interests of the child&lt;/a&gt;” standard means, and how it works when applied to a specific family.  Our last article examined the &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;fourth factor under &lt;a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=26.09.187"&gt;RCW 26.09.187(3)(a)&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#8211; &amp;#8220;&lt;a href="http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-the-emotional-needs-and-developmental-level-of-the-child/"&gt;the emotional needs and developmental level of the child.&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#8220;  Today, we&amp;#8217;re looking at&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Decoupling/~4/t3Qkh0QmOes" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-relationship-with-siblings-and-other-significant-adults/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-relationship-with-siblings-and-other-significant-adults/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Interests of the Child – The Emotional Needs and Developmental Level of the Child</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Decoupling/~3/Eqsi_P0hDTw/</link>
		<comments>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-the-emotional-needs-and-developmental-level-of-the-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting plan.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCW 26.09.187]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential schedule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decouplingblog.com/?p=3513</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In this series, we&amp;#8217;re reviewing Washington cases which help us to understand what exactly the “&lt;a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=26.09.002');" href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=26.09.002"&gt;best interests of the child&lt;/a&gt;” standard means, and how it works when applied to a specific family.  Last week we discussed the&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt; third factor, the &amp;#8220;&lt;a href="http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-past-and-potential-for-future-performance-of-parenting-functions/"&gt;past and future performance of parenting functions&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#8220;, which relates to each parent&amp;#8217;s ability to take care of&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Decoupling/~4/Eqsi_P0hDTw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-the-emotional-needs-and-developmental-level-of-the-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/02/best-interests-of-the-child-the-emotional-needs-and-developmental-level-of-the-child/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Adventures in Community Property Breaking News – Clayton v. Wilson (2010)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Decoupling/~3/6m6arExM4qU/</link>
		<comments>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/adventures-in-community-property-breaking-news-clayton-v-wilson-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pop Quiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separate property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spouses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decouplingblog.com/?p=3491</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In two previous &lt;a href="http://decouplingblog.com/2009/09/adventures-in-community-property-part-one-the-road-warrior-and-the-pedophile/"&gt;pop&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://decouplingblog.com/2009/10/adventures-in-community-property-part-two-the-wasted-hostage-taker-and-the-amorous-yachtsman/"&gt;quizzes&lt;/a&gt;, we discussed previous Washington court decisions regarding community property and community liability for torts committed by one spouse.  To recap:  Washington is a &lt;a href="http://decouplingblog.com/2009/09/whats-community-property/"&gt;community property&lt;/a&gt; state, which generally means that all property that a couple acquires during their marriage is considered to be jointly owned by both spouses, and neither spouse can&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Decoupling/~4/6m6arExM4qU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/adventures-in-community-property-breaking-news-clayton-v-wilson-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/adventures-in-community-property-breaking-news-clayton-v-wilson-2010/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Interests of the Child – Past and Potential for Future Performance of Parenting Functions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Decoupling/~3/nuyuIb01oJA/</link>
		<comments>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-past-and-potential-for-future-performance-of-parenting-functions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting plan.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCW 26.09.187]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential schedule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decouplingblog.com/?p=3454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In this series, we’re taking a look at some Washington cases that shed some light on to what the “&lt;a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=26.09.002"&gt;best interests of the child&lt;/a&gt;” standard means, and how it works when applied to a specific family.  Last week we discussed the &lt;a href="http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-agreement-of-the-parents/"&gt;second factor&lt;/a&gt;, “&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;the agreements of the parties.”  In that article we saw just how much discretion a&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Decoupling/~4/nuyuIb01oJA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-past-and-potential-for-future-performance-of-parenting-functions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-past-and-potential-for-future-performance-of-parenting-functions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Interests of the Child – Agreement of the Parents</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Decoupling/~3/Q-7eNk2veJ0/</link>
		<comments>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-agreement-of-the-parents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting plan.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prenuptial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCW 26.09.187]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential schedule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decouplingblog.com/?p=3434</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In this series, we’re taking a look at some Washington cases that shed some light on to what the “best interests of the child” standard means, and how it works when applied to a specific family.  &lt;a href="http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-the-quality-of-the-parent-child-relationship/"&gt;Last week we discussed the first, and most important factor&lt;/a&gt;, &amp;#8220;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;the relative strength, nature, and stability of the child’s relationship with each parent.&amp;#8221; &lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Decoupling/~4/Q-7eNk2veJ0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-agreement-of-the-parents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-agreement-of-the-parents/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Interests of the Child – The Quality of the Parent Child Relationship</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Decoupling/~3/w48vJNwQakM/</link>
		<comments>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-the-quality-of-the-parent-child-relationship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting plan.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visitation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decouplingblog.com/?p=3401</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;In this series, we&amp;#8217;re taking a look at some Washington cases that shed some light on to what the “best interests of the child” standard means, and how it works when applied to a specific family.  Today, in this second article in the series, we&amp;#8217;re taking a look at the first of the seven  factors that Washington courts must consider&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Decoupling/~4/w48vJNwQakM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-the-quality-of-the-parent-child-relationship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://decouplingblog.com/2010/01/best-interests-of-the-child-the-quality-of-the-parent-child-relationship/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Interests Of The Child: What It Means</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Decoupling/~3/hh8uN6x41hU/</link>
		<comments>http://decouplingblog.com/2009/12/best-interests-of-the-child-what-it-means/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting plan.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decouplingblog.com/?p=3390</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;#8217;ve ever been involved in a child custody dispute in Washington, you are probably familiar with, or have at least heard of the concept of &amp;#8220;best interests of the child.&amp;#8221;   The best interests of the child standard is a Washington court&amp;#8217;s primary and most important consideration when making decisions about children.  Indeed, we&amp;#8217;ve touched on the best interests standard&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Decoupling/~4/hh8uN6x41hU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://decouplingblog.com/2009/12/best-interests-of-the-child-what-it-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://decouplingblog.com/2009/12/best-interests-of-the-child-what-it-means/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>I Want to Relocate with My Kids – Do I Need to Tell My Ex?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Decoupling/~3/uSt7DKkx4w4/</link>
		<comments>http://decouplingblog.com/2009/11/i-want-to-relocate-with-my-kids-do-i-need-to-tell-my-ex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask a Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objection to relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting plan.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decouplingblog.com/?p=3363</guid>
		<description>&lt;h3&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Question&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My wife and I divorced about 5 years ago.  We have two kids.  Under our final parenting plan, I am the primary residential parent and my wife sees the kids every other weekend, and once a week during the week.  I was recently offered a great new job that will really improve our financial situation.  The only problem is&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Decoupling/~4/uSt7DKkx4w4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://decouplingblog.com/2009/11/i-want-to-relocate-with-my-kids-do-i-need-to-tell-my-ex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://decouplingblog.com/2009/11/i-want-to-relocate-with-my-kids-do-i-need-to-tell-my-ex/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.915 seconds. --><!-- File not cached! Super Cache Couldn't write to: wp-content/cache/wp-cache-04220308a30693f99aef07f0c7b53ea9.html -->
