<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Daily SEO Tip</title>
	
	<link>http://dailyseotip.com</link>
	<description>SEO Tips &amp; Tutorials : Daily!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DailySeoTip" /><feedburner:info uri="dailyseotip" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>DailySeoTip</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Affiliate Marketing Report Card</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~3/PaKX9fn7eJw/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyseotip.com/affiliate-marketing-report-card/669/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Loren Baker</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[affiliate marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyseotip.com/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Want to get into affiliate marketing and puzzled on which way to go and which programs to work with? The Affiliate Marketing Report Card may be right up your alley. If you are looking for an interesting comparison of affiliate programs.
Every affiliate marketing account offers different types of commissions,  order sizes, and may have specific [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Want to get into affiliate marketing and puzzled on which way to go and which programs to work with? The Affiliate Marketing Report Card may be right up your alley. If you are looking for an interesting comparison of affiliate programs.</p>
<p>Every affiliate marketing account offers different types of commissions,  order sizes, and may have specific payment thresholds .. so be sure to do your homework <img src='http://dailyseotip.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><img src="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/aff-card.jpg"><br />
<br />
Source: <a href="http://www.aceaffiliates.com/affiliate-education/affiliate-marketing-review-report-card.html">Affiliate Marketing Review Report Card</a> by AceAffiliates.com</p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~4/PaKX9fn7eJw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyseotip.com/affiliate-marketing-report-card/669/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://dailyseotip.com/affiliate-marketing-report-card/669/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>No-Follow, Do-Follow, Can’t Follow?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~3/4ZgXXEfdOa0/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyseotip.com/no-follow-do-follow-can%e2%80%99t-follow/666/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[On-Site SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nofollow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyseotip.com/?p=666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
*The following guest post is by Duncan*
After reading a couple of posts on this site and seeing just how worked up people are getting over the whole ‘no-follow’ link business. I thought I would chuck my thoughts into the mixer and try to clear up a few things.
A History
Firstly, the no-follow attribute (it’s not a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>*The following guest post is by Duncan*</em></p>
<p>After reading a couple of posts on this site and seeing just how worked up people are getting over the whole ‘no-follow’ link business. I thought I would chuck my thoughts into the mixer and try to clear up a few things.</p>
<p><strong>A History</strong></p>
<p>Firstly, the no-follow attribute (it’s not a tag) on links was first introduced back in 2005 by the Big G. They said that if you add rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; to your links then those links “won’t get any credit when we rank websites”. MSN and Yahoo! Quickly jumped onboard and said they would support the new initiative as well.</p>
<p>Even back then there was a level of mis-trust surrounding Google, and so webmasters and SEOs took it upon themselves to test this new ‘no-follow’ theory. Some found that the no-follow attribute did <a href="http://www.bubub.org/rel_nofollow_test.html">indeed work</a> and sites did not get any power when linked to with no-follow links. Others have since claimed that <a href="http://www.seo-writer.com/blog/2009/08/31/look-who-follows-nofollow-links/">power is still passed</a> through no-follow links.</p>
<p>There was even speculation over whether Google actually crawled and indexed pages that had only been linked to using no-follow links. Unfortunately, there has never (to the best of knowledge) been extensive research conducted on this topic and certainly no categorical evidence on the matter published on highly-trustworthy sites. Instead, we have been left with much hearsay and speculation about whether no-follow actually works or not.</p>
<p>However, what we have got are indications and hints from the search engines that we can use to piece together some idea of the truth.<span id="more-666"></span></p>
<p><strong>Common Sense</strong></p>
<p>Firstly, we can use logic to determine what is in the best interests of the search engines. Spam is a massive problem for them and we know that websites sometimes need to link out to other sites that they don’t necessarily want to pass power to. For example, they might want to warn about a spammy or scammy website, but at the same time not help it rank. Also, many large websites cannot look after every link on the site and so are open to link spam. With this in mind it makes perfect sense for search engines to introduce a method for maintaining clean hyperlinks, but not ‘voting’ for the site being linked to.  I’ll also add to this argument that in my experience I have never seen no-follow links pass any power that has gone on to help rankings.</p>
<p><strong>Double-Bluff</strong></p>
<p>There is another argument as well that comes about from Google shooting itself in the foot somewhat. By introducing the no-follow attribute, webmasters and SEOs soon realised that they could use these links to craft the internal power of their sites to make some of their pages more powerful than others (PageRank sculpting). Additionally, some sites starting adopting <a href="http://seoblackhat.com/2008/09/08/black-hole-seo/">Black Hole</a> SEO techniques, not linking out to any websites without using no-follow links, thus maintaining all link juice power in the site. The link juice does not leak out, but instead gets recycled internally and arguable increases exponentially, leading to very power websites.</p>
<p>Google obviously did not like the abusing of their very clever link attribute and so Matt Cutts wrote a post about how Google had changed the algorithm so no-follow internal links now wasted link juice. He claimed although no power was passed through them, no-follow links were still including in how many times the power of a page was divided between the links. Incidentally I don’t believe a word of this, but that doesn’t matter, what is more important is what it implied. This move cemented for me that fact that no-follow links do not pass power, otherwise Google would not have bothered telling website owners not to use it.</p>
<p><strong>Crawl &amp; Index?</strong></p>
<p>In terms of whether search engines crawl and index pages that have nothing but no-follow links pointing to them, there are unfortunately not as many clues. However, it is my personally opinion that it does follow those links as Google very nosey and tends to want to know what is going on in every corner of the web. These pages rarely rank though as they have no power to move them up the SERPS. Again, from experience I have seen pages cached that having nothing but no-follow links.  Even Google is not definitive on the matter saying “In general, we don’t follow them”, which obviously means that they can and do.</p>
<p>In semi-conclusion then: no-follow links do not pass power, but are crawled and sometimes indexed by Google. I cannot really speak for other the other search engines, but then I’m not sure I care about them.</p>
<p><em>Duncan is a search specialist who represents a <a href="http://www.whitestarcruises.com">luxury cruises</a> company. Duncan often blogs about internet marking and SEO techniques of past, present and future.</em></p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~4/4ZgXXEfdOa0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyseotip.com/no-follow-do-follow-can%e2%80%99t-follow/666/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://dailyseotip.com/no-follow-do-follow-can%e2%80%99t-follow/666/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Keywords Research for Online SEO Applications</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~3/-nKd_TyYLn4/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyseotip.com/keywords-research-for-online-seo-applications/652/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Webnauts</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyseotip.com/?p=652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Have you ever wondered why that really good looking website that you thought had all the perfect information on it to get tons of traffic doesn’t rank anywhere near well on the search engines?
Sure it’s great looking, but who can tell if they can’t find it?
And how about your web site? Are you working hard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Have you ever wondered why that really good looking website that you thought had all the perfect information on it to get tons of traffic doesn’t rank anywhere near well on the search engines?</p>
<p><a name="more-52"></a>Sure it’s great looking, but who can tell if they can’t find it?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">And how about your web site? Are you working hard hard on your web site SEO (search engine optimization) to improve your search engine rankings and conversions, but doing that manually yourself turns out to be too confusing?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">There are many online SEO (search engine optimization) applications which can help you analyze and measure your web site&#8217;s rankings and conversions potential. Even if nobody knows the exact algorithms that the search engines use, they still can be very helpful if you are not afraid to use your intelligence and common sense.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">If you would do a search with search engines to find such kind of applications, which keyphrase would you type in the search engines search box to find them? Please help giving your vote in the poll below.</p>
<p><script src="http://twtpoll.com/js/badge.js" type="text/javascript"></script><br />
<script src="http://twtpoll.com/badge/?twt=e3zatb&#038;s=250&#038;b=1&#038;bt=1" type="text/javascript"></script></p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~4/-nKd_TyYLn4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyseotip.com/keywords-research-for-online-seo-applications/652/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://dailyseotip.com/keywords-research-for-online-seo-applications/652/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>4 Steps to a More User-Friendly Website</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~3/RTUZjmQiL8A/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyseotip.com/4-steps-to-a-more-user-friendly-website/635/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyseotip.com/?p=635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
*The following guest post is by Amber Singleton Riviere*
Web design  can be challenging.  For me, the challenge is in not making things too  complex and in keeping things simple and clean, which makes the site more  user-friendly and a more pleasant experience for visitors.  Here are a few  steps to make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>*The following guest post is by Amber Singleton Riviere*</em></p>
<p>Web design  can be challenging.  For me, the challenge is in not making things too  complex and in keeping things simple and clean, which makes the site more  user-friendly and a more pleasant experience for visitors.  Here are a few  steps to make sure your site is effectively helping you achieve your  objectives, while remaining easy to use for your visitors.</p>
<p><strong>Step 1: Keep it simple.</strong></p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s tempting, or maybe just our first impulse, to over-complicate  things.  Website design is not exempt from that tendency, but if you want  to build a site that&#8217;s effective (that helps you achieve your goals),  simplicity is key.  What is simplicity in web design?  It&#8217;s sticking  with the basics.  It&#8217;s not worrying about being cool or edgy or  unique.  I know, we want our websites to stand out, but even though  intuitively we might think the opposite is true, simplicity in design, layout,  and functionality actually will make them stand out from the crowd.<span id="more-635"></span></p>
<p><strong>Step 2: Be painfully obvious.</strong></p>
<p>Another common tendency is to want to name pages, especially navigation links,  in a unique way.  Nothing will frustrate your site visitors (or cause them  to click away from your site to another more user-friendly one) than making  them have to think too much.  If they want to contact you, they&#8217;re going  to look for the &#8220;Contact&#8221; link.  If they want to find out more  about your products or services, they&#8217;re going to look for your &#8220;Products  and Services&#8221; link.  If they want to find out more about you or your  company, they&#8217;re going to look for your &#8220;About&#8221; link.  That&#8217;s  it.  It&#8217;s that simple.  Name your pages in an unexpected way will  only cause confusion in your site visitors.  It&#8217;s going to seem painfully  obvious and even boring to you, sure, but you have to ask yourself if you&#8217;d  prefer to be hip or edgy or if you want your site to be usable and to work for  you to meet your objectives.</p>
<p>Important Thing to Note: I&#8217;m talking about navigation links here, not the  actual full page names.  Those are two separate things.  The links in  your navigation should be clear and obvious, but your full page names should be  descriptive for search engine optimization purposes.<br />
<strong>Step 3: Think in an outline.</strong></p>
<p>Before you dive into building pages and adding content to your site,  stop.  Stop and think, &#8220;Will this get lost?  Am I building  circles and mazes and a sea of pages that lack clear hierarchy?&#8221;  You  want to think in terms of an obvious outline.</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Home</li>
<li>About</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Our        Mission</li>
<li>Our        Team</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>
<ul type="circle">
<li>
<ul type="square">
<li>CEO/Founder</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Services</li>
<li>Blog</li>
<li>Contact</li>
</ul>
<p>Plan out your site in a clear outline.  Do your planning on paper first so  that you see the clarity (or lack of) in the hierarchy of your site.  If  you dive in and immediately get to work on the home page (our first impulse),  you&#8217;ll end up with a jumbled mess that&#8217;s confusing, both to you and to your  site visitors.</p>
<p><strong>Step 4: Don&#8217;t overcrowd or clutter.</strong></p>
<p>Sometimes you have to put all the content (images, text/copy, lists, etc.) that  you hope to have on a page up before you can see how it&#8217;s going to stack up  visually.  It&#8217;s kind of like arranging a room in your house.  You  can&#8217;t know how you&#8217;re going to position the furniture or how cluttered the room  will ultimately feel until you try to put everything into the room.  Once  you have everything in there, you can see, &#8220;No, it&#8217;s too cluttered in  here.  I can&#8217;t even walk without bumping into things.  Something&#8217;s  gotta go.&#8221;  The same is true with your web pages.  Less is  generally more.  You want empty space and room to move around.  Once  you have all the content up, expect to cut it by at least 15%.  You want  to have enough visual breathing space for the most important things to stand  out, and you definitely don&#8217;t want to overwhelm your visitors.</p>
<p>Many times, our naturally impulse is to lean toward complexity, and that can be  counter-productive in web design.  If you want your site to help you  achieve your end goals, you have to keep things simple and usable for your site  visitors.</p>
<p><em>Amber Singleton Riviere is the founder of  Upstart Smart, a resource for small business owners, as well as the Rock Your  Genius radio show, which focuses on small business and entrepreneurship.   She also runs the Give Back Project, a web design and marketing firm, and  writes for websites like Web Worker Daily on topics relevant to small business  owners.  You can find out about all of Amber&#8217;s work by visiting <a href="http://www.ambersingleton.com/">AmberSingleton.com </a> .</em></p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~4/RTUZjmQiL8A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyseotip.com/4-steps-to-a-more-user-friendly-website/635/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://dailyseotip.com/4-steps-to-a-more-user-friendly-website/635/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>4 Ways to Really Make Your Internal Links Work Hard For You</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~3/YLd0R0bFqBs/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyseotip.com/4-ways-to-really-make-your-internal-links-work-hard-for-you/643/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[On-Site SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internal interlinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyseotip.com/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
*The following is the guest post by Duncan*
External hyperlinks are great for SEO, but it’s the internal variety that you can manipulate to your heart’s content and optimise for search engines. Given this level of control you have over your own links, are you sure they are working as hard as they can be for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>*The following is the guest post by </em><em>Duncan*</em></p>
<p>External hyperlinks are great for SEO, but it’s the internal variety that you can manipulate to your heart’s content and optimise for search engines. Given this level of control you have over your own links, are you sure they are working as hard as they can be for you? If they aren’t complying to the advice below, then chances are they are slacking and need to be given 100 push-ups right now!</p>
<p><strong>Keywords in Anchor Text</strong></p>
<p>This might seem like an obvious one for some people, but you would be amazed just how many sites don’t think to include keywords in their internal links. This one of the major factors that search engines look at when trying to determine what a page is all about, so as long as you are not compromising on usability, you should get those keywords in your links. For example, let’s say you have a site offering corporate hospitality that covers all the major sporting events. Rather than link to the Superbowl page with the text “Superbowl”, it would probably be much better for you to use the term “Superbowl hospitality”, or “Superbowl corporate hospitality”. Don’t go crazy though and starting linking to your homepage using the term “corporate hospitality events” or “premium client entertaining” etc, as this will just start to confuse users.<span id="more-643"></span></p>
<p><strong>Important Links Moved Up The Source Order<br />
</strong><br />
Many people don’t think to move their most important internal links up the order in the source code. Search engines tend to crawl the links at the top of the page first, so it stands to reason that the first elements should be the most important ones. Let’s say for example your category page links appear in the source code below your ‘about us’, ‘contact us’, ‘RSS’, ‘settings’ links etc. Whist these may be important to users, it is unlikely you want to pass power to these pages for ranking purposes and so you can move them down the source order. There is no need to change the look of the page, just use JavaScript to move elements about. Matt Cutts even hints at the fact links found in different parts of a page might be treated differently by Google:</p>
<p><object width="560" height="340" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/D0fgh5RIHdE&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/D0fgh5RIHdE&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object><br />
<strong><br />
Text Links Above Images</strong></p>
<p>Tying into the idea above, when linking out to the same place twice or more from a single page, always put your most valuable link first in the source order, as this will be one search engines pay attention  to. By ‘most valuable’ I mean most search engine friendly, which is often a key-worded text link.  This is most often a problem for ecommerce sites as displayed by the product screen shot below.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4045/4402276920_056b1b47a2_o.jpg" alt="Product links" /></p>
<p>Here there are 3 links all going to the same product page. First is the image link, second the product title link and third the price also links to the product page. On this occasion the image link appears first in the source code and is likely to be the one that search engines crawl. However, we really want search engines to look at the keywords in the product title text link, so it would be more beneficial to move this above the image link in the source code.</p>
<p><strong>Links Limited to Around 100 Per Page</strong></p>
<p>It is has been stated in the Google <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769">Webmaster guidelines</a> for a long time now that you should limited the amount of links (internal or external) to around 100 per page. The reasoning for this suggestion has changed a little however since it first appeared in the guidelines. Originally, Google’s crawlers could only index around 100k of a webpage, which they roughly equated would be around 100 links. However, as Google has become more power they can index far greater amounts of data.</p>
<p>The argument they give for still including the 100 link rule in their suggestions is a usability one. They say that people don’t like pages full of links and it is more ‘user-friendly’ to break the links up into separate pages. There is however clear SEO benefits to keeping the number relatively low as otherwise the link power of the page will be diluted too much. Roughly speaking, the link juice of a page gets divided by the number of links heading out from it. Therefore, if you have 1000 links on page, each of those linked to pages will receive very little (relative) power indeed. It is usually advisable to try and spread links over more pages or better yet categorise them onto strong, stand-alone pages to improve user and search engine friendliness.<br />
<em><br />
Duncan is an online marketing expert at a Sussex-based <a href="http://www.freshegg.com">SEO</a> company. He blogs about topics from social media to link building and content optimisation.</em></p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~4/YLd0R0bFqBs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyseotip.com/4-ways-to-really-make-your-internal-links-work-hard-for-you/643/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://dailyseotip.com/4-ways-to-really-make-your-internal-links-work-hard-for-you/643/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Should Never Ever Use Pop-Ups on Your Site</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~3/T_CNQ18ojtg/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyseotip.com/why-you-should-never-ever-use-pop-ups-on-your-site/628/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyseotip.com/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
*The following guest post is by Duncan*
I like to think that I have become a more passive and accepting internet user over the years. Perhaps this is because I no longer have to wait ten minutes to upload an image and web pages load as fast as my brain works (sometimes even faster). I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>*The following guest post is by Duncan*</em></p>
<p>I like to think that I have become a more passive and accepting internet user over the years. Perhaps this is because I no longer have to wait ten minutes to upload an image and web pages load as fast as my brain works (sometimes even faster). I have not however lost my contempt for people trying to get one over on me or make me do things I don’t want to do.</p>
<p>I remember back in the day, the first time I opened a .exe file from a friendly email, only to get a huge phone bill through the post a couple of weeks later saying my computer had been ‘dialling’ out to Delhi every five minutes for the last fortnight. I was soon after introduced to virus and malware protection and coupled with my cable internet connection I again felt safe to roam the streets of the information super highway once again. I think I even reached a state of browsing zen for a couple of days, until I found my first pop-up that is.<span id="more-628"></span></p>
<p>These intensely infuriating, invasive creations of Beelzebub get in the way of what I am trying to do and serve only to make me hate the website I am on and the product or service being advertised more than I hate my mother-in-law.  I do have pop-up blockers but the tenacious critters still frequently find their way through. For me they fly right in the face (literarily) of what the internet and usability is all about. When I visit a website I expect every part of it to earn its place in my consciousness, and if it doesn’t, then either it is not important or the site has not been built properly.  If I want to go to the ‘kitchen accessories’ section of the website I will look around for a link that I interpret to be the right path and follow it, likewise with the DVD and underwear sections respectively. I do not want to be told however that “I MUST CHECK THE BOOK SECTION NOW!!” Or “VISIT THIS VIAGRA SITE&#8230;.NOW!”</p>
<p>Pop-up ads are not good for website image and do not work for advertisers. But don’t just take my word for it; there are <a href="http://www.silicon.com/technology/hardware/2004/02/25/pop-ups-commercial-suicide-for-firms-39118629/">Many</a> <a href="http://www.usabilitynews.com/news/article1608.asp">reports</a> that show pop-ups are just about the worst thing you can get involved with.  There are so many alternative methods for merchants to market their website, and myriad different options that help site owners to earn a few extra bucks. There is no need to encourage people to imbed their fists in their computer screens by popping up, under, sideways or any other way for that matter.</p>
<p><em>Duncan is an SEO and online marketing expert who represents a <a href="http://www.americansky.co.uk/Las_Vegas_holidays.htm">Las Vegas holidays</a> company. He believes there are much better ways to promote websites than forcing them down people’s throats.</em></p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~4/T_CNQ18ojtg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyseotip.com/why-you-should-never-ever-use-pop-ups-on-your-site/628/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://dailyseotip.com/why-you-should-never-ever-use-pop-ups-on-your-site/628/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Wikipedia Style</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~3/8B16XmdfhhQ/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyseotip.com/seo-wikipedia-style/623/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internal interlinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyseotip.com/?p=623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
*This is a guest post by Jason Capshaw*
If you have been in the internet marketing  game for any length of time, chances are that you have run up against a highly-ranked  Wikipedia page in your search vertical. SEO is no exception.

Not only does Wikipedia have the first two  spots, but it also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>*This is a guest post by Jason Capshaw*</em></p>
<p>If you have been in the internet marketing  game for any length of time, chances are that you have run up against a highly-ranked  Wikipedia page in your search vertical. SEO is no exception.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4013/4387495155_aa38cd1f8f_o.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="592" /></p>
<p>Not only does Wikipedia have the first two  spots, but it also has a “Show more results from the wiki” underneath its  listing. Of course, Wikipedia has major domain authority with 82 million  inbound links, and it even outranks Google’s own SEO page.<span id="more-623"></span></p>
<p>Compared to some of the other pages in the  search result, the two Wikipedia pages featured have less external backlinks.  As a matter of fact, six of the other listings on the first page have many more  inbound links to their pages. Also, listings on the second page of search  results have many more inbound links.</p>
<p>It would be practically impossible to  replicate Wikipedia’s domain authority. However, what is not difficult to  replicate is how Wikipedia wields its authority.  Within every page on Wikipedia where “SEO” or  “Search Engine Optimization” is mentioned, it links to its own internal page  about the subject.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4020/4388236846_8326aecb98_o.jpg" alt="" width="545" height="249" /></p>
<p>A site search of Wikipedia (site:  Wikipedia.org search engine optimization) produces 62,800 results. Many of  these pages link to our top two search results.</p>
<p>Wikipedia does not rely on a huge side or  header navigation to give users the ability to drill down to their topic of  interest. It only links to itself from within the main content section of the  site. Links from the main content sections are much more valuable and pass more  authority to the receiving pages than headers or side navigations.</p>
<p>By implementing a similar strategy within  your own website or blog, you can boost search rankings without completely depending  on offsite link building tactics.</p>
<p><strong>Implementation  Tips</strong></p>
<p>The home page is usually the most  authoritative page on a site. Linking to important pages from the content  section will boost their rankings. Blogs naturally do this with the most recent  posts, but most static sites do not use this tactic.</p>
<p>Hide important header and sidebar links  from the search engines on the home page of a site with javascript or an iframe  since only one link and anchor text will be counted. Now, link to the important  pages of your site from inside of the main copy and unlock all of the real  authority that your homepage carries.</p>
<p>Automation is obviously the easiest way to  use this tactic unless you have millions of users ready to edit your content. I  use a <a href="http://seoroi.com/specialty-services/new-seo-plugin-for-wordpress-internal-link-building/">plugin</a> that automatically links to a page of my choice every time a keyword is used in  the text of my blog. It’s much easier than doing it manually.</p>
<p>Some have said that one drawback to using  this tactic is that pages become diluted and users find the links confusing,  and may jump out of a conversion funnel. Testing should be done on a case by  case scenario; however, it does not seem to have hurt Wikipedia’s user base.</p>
<p><em><br />
Jason Capshaw is founder of an <a href="http://www.mywebtronics.com/">Atlanta Web Design</a> and <a href="http://www.mywebtronics.com/atlanta-seo-services.html">SEO services</a> company. He lives with his wife and two children in Hampton, GA.</em></p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~4/8B16XmdfhhQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyseotip.com/seo-wikipedia-style/623/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://dailyseotip.com/seo-wikipedia-style/623/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Widely Believed Myths Of SEO</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~3/PaSbwONhO4Q/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyseotip.com/7-widely-believed-myths-of-seo/619/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dofollow]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nofollow]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyseotip.com/?p=619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
*This is a guest post by Christopher Holland*
I  recently signed up to a few business and SEO forums and was amazed at what  people still recommend.
As there  are so many people offering outdated or wrong tips and tricks on how to improve  your search engine optimisation (SEO) campaigns, I thought I’d [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>*This is a guest post by Christopher Holland*</em></p>
<p>I  recently signed up to a few business and SEO forums and was amazed at what  people still recommend.</p>
<p>As there  are so many people offering outdated or wrong tips and tricks on how to improve  your search engine optimisation (SEO) campaigns, I thought I’d let you know of  some of the biggest myths around.</p>
<p>Search  engines are always changing their algorithms, and over the past decade things  have changed dramatically. Due to complexity of this industry, and  the rapid changes, this has led to the many believed SEO myths which I have  listed below.</p>
<p><strong>1) Submit your websites to  search engines</strong></p>
<p><span id="more-619"></span>I  still hear about people submitting their website to Google and other search  engines to get indexed and to “rank higher” - this just simply isn’t true  anymore. It has been at least 5 years since this technique has been necessary  and all you need to do is obtain a few backlinks and make sure your not  blocking robots from crawling your website.</p>
<p><strong>2) <a href="http://dailyseotip.com/forget-about-keyword-density/69/" target="_blank">Keyword densities</a></strong></p>
<p>There are still hundreds and hundreds (probably thousands) of websites  that either have lots of keywords spammed at the bottom of their website or  within their content. This will do more harm than good, and it’s almost a  certainty that you will get penalised and dropped from the results.</p>
<p>So instead of spamming, I recommend that you write great content  targeted towards your visitors and to include your chosen keywords naturally  (this should not be a problem as you should be targeting relevant keywords to  the page).</p>
<p><strong>3) Content length</strong></p>
<p>A while ago, there was a big rumour that went around saying that you need to  have a specific number of words in order to get indexed and to increase your  position.</p>
<p>Your content should be as long  as it needs to be to tell the reader exactly what you need to.</p>
<p><strong>4) Keyword rich domain name</strong></p>
<p>It is still widely believed that  if you have keywords within your domain name like <a href="http://www.website-design-nbat-digital.co.uk/">www.website-design-nbat-digital.co.uk</a>,  that it will improve your rankings. This is not true. Your domain should be  short, contain your company name and most importantly be easy to remember.</p>
<p><em>Note from Ann: I actually <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-much-weigh-do-keywords-in-the-domain-name-still-have-poll/10857/" target="_blank">still believe in this one</a> <img src='http://dailyseotip.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
(But not in spamming your domain with keywords though)</em></p>
<p><strong>5) Meta  Tags are no longer relevant</strong></p>
<p>To an extent this is true, but there are still some  uses for the META tags. First off, I’d like to  say that the keywords tag is no longer used by the main search engines, and therefore  does not need including, let alone optimising.</p>
<p>Now that’s out the way, let’s move onto the other  main META tag – description. The description  tag does not affect rankings in anyway, but it’s a chance for you to try and  sell your company and to get a user to click on your website. If you can write  a compelling ad that is about your product or service, then you could see your  click through rates increase through the roof.</p>
<p>Finally, the title tag. This is the most important  tag which highly contributes to your on page optimisation. You should include  your main keyword as close to the beginning as you can and of course don’t fill  it with unrelated keywords.</p>
<p><strong>6) Pay Per Click will help  or hurt your organic rankings</strong></p>
<p>Running  a Pay per click (PPC) campaign will not directly affect your organic rankings. However, by occupying two positions for  the same keyword you give the user a choice, and while the PPC ad can be good  for getting extra traffic, some of the PPC visitors will come from those who  previously might have clicked on the organic listing.</p>
<p><strong>7) NoFollow links are a waste of time</strong></p>
<p>Anyone running a link building campaign should  acquire both NoFollow and DoFollow links. Not only will this look far more  natural but studies suggest that not all search engines pay attention to the  NoFollow attribute and in fact value them the same as a DoFollow link.</p>
<p><em>This article was by Christopher Holland, who is a  search engine marketer for <a href="http://www.nbatdigital.co.uk">nbat Digital</a> - professional <a href="http://www.nbatdigital.co.uk">web design</a> and search  engine optimisation services. Follow us on twitter - <a href="http://twitter.com/nbatdigital">@nbatdigital</a> or take a look at <a href="http://blog.nbatdigital.co.uk/">our blog</a>.</em></p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~4/PaSbwONhO4Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyseotip.com/7-widely-believed-myths-of-seo/619/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://dailyseotip.com/7-widely-believed-myths-of-seo/619/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Avoid the Robots.txt Writer’s Block!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~3/E4Z_Icx--Ps/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyseotip.com/how-to-avoid-the-robottxt-writer%e2%80%99s-block/610/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[On-Site SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[advanced search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[robots.txt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyseotip.com/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
*This short but very useful tip was submitted by Charly Wargnier.*
When doing SEO changes for large scale companies, implementing a proper robot.txt is crucial. I will not go back to the robot.txt definition bla, bla… millions have done that before me.
No, instead, just a simple formula to use whenever the geek inside you has a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>*This short but very useful tip was submitted by Charly Wargnier.*</em></p>
<p>When doing SEO changes for large scale companies, implementing a proper robot.txt is crucial. I will not go back to the robot.txt definition bla, bla… millions have done that before me.</p>
<p>No, instead, just a simple formula to use whenever the geek inside you has a Robot.txt Writer’s block! So, type “inurl:robots.txt filetype:txt” and, ta-daa! See what the big names are doing.</p>
<p>You will find the robots.txt file from Google, Wikipedia, WebmasterWorld, the White House, Microsoft, W3.org, Facebook, IBM, Amazon, Ebay, New York Times, CNN, YouTube, etc.</p>
<p>Have Geek Fun.</p>
<p><em>The   guest post is by Charly Wargnier, SEO Head at the <a href="http://www.eustondigital.co.uk/">London digital agency</a> Euston Digital.   You can follow their <a href="http://www.eustondigital.co.uk/blog/">SEO tips and   tricks</a> on ED&#8217;s Blog, or their Twitter <a href="http://twitter.com/eustondigital">here</a></em></p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~4/E4Z_Icx--Ps" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyseotip.com/how-to-avoid-the-robottxt-writer%e2%80%99s-block/610/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://dailyseotip.com/how-to-avoid-the-robottxt-writer%e2%80%99s-block/610/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Optimize Your Site for Image Search</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~3/imqUjex9dC4/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyseotip.com/how-to-optimize-your-site-for-image-search/613/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Contributor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[On-Site SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[image optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyseotip.com/?p=613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
*The following tip was Christine  Laubenstein of WordStream*

A good way to get an edge over  your industry competitors is to optimize your website for image search. Many  companies focus their search engine optimization (SEO) efforts on their website  copy, with little regard for the pictures. Take advantage of their inaction in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>*The following tip was </em><em>Christine  Laubenstein of </em><em><a href="http://www.wordstream.com/">WordStream</a></em><em>*<br />
</em></p>
<p>A good way to get an edge over  your industry competitors is to optimize your website for image search. Many  companies focus their search engine optimization (SEO) efforts on their website  copy, with little regard for the pictures. Take advantage of their inaction in  this area by boosting the search engine visibility of your images, and  therefore your website.</p>
<p><strong>Why  should you care about image search? </strong></p>
<p>There are several reasons why  you should want your site to rank high in image search results for your  keywords.<span id="more-613"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>First  off, <strong>a large chunk of people are using  image search</strong> to find content. According to Alexa Internet, about 10 percent  of Google’s visitors go to the site’s image search page. Bing and Yahoo also  have their own images searches. Image searchers might be interested in  photography, seeking free photos for their blog, or wondering what a particular  product looks like. If your photos and surrounding content are relevant, you  want these people to find your site. And if your site is useful and  captivating, they may become customers or loyal readers.</li>
<li>A  second reason you should care about image search is that <strong>universal searches typically incorporate images </strong>into their results.  For example, when you type “Beyonce” into Yahoo’s universal search engine, the  first page of search results includes Yahoo Image Search results about halfway  down the page. The displayed photos are also the first ones that appear in a  Yahoo Image Search. Universal search is the default mode for Google and many  queries return image results.</li>
<li><strong>A third benefit of optimizing  your si</strong>te for image search is it <strong>forces you to improve your site’s consistency</strong>. In other words, it  pushes you to evaluate your niche; adjust your photos, content and keyword so they  align with your niche; and get rid of items that lack relevance. This will also  boost your overall position in search engine rankings. Search engines like  sites with a targeted message.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>What  first steps should you take to optimize your site for image search?</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>As  mentioned above, you want to go through your site and <strong>get rid of photos that don’t fit with the overall theme</strong> of your  website. It might be hard to part with certain pictures, especially if you took  them and are proud, but do it anyway. As they say, you must “kill your  darlings” for the greater good. In SEO-speak, the greater good is better search  engine rankings. If you choose, you can replace the photos you removed with  ones that are relevant.</li>
<li>Next  you should make sure that your photos <strong>are  relatively large, have high resolutions and contrasts, and have good aspect  ratios</strong>. Search engines look for quality photos that will look decent in  thumbnail form, since that’s the form the photos take on in search results.</li>
<li>Next  you should <strong>make sure that your photo  file names sufficiently describe</strong> the photos and contain your keywords. Because  search engines can’t yet &#8220;read&#8221; images themselves, you must use other  methods to associate your keywords with the images. The file name is one way to  do this. Say you sell nonstick Madeleine pans and your keyword phrase is  “nonstick Madeleine pans.” It doesn’t take a genius to determine you should  label a photo of nonstick Madeleine pans “nonstick-madeleine-pans.jpg.”</li>
<li>You  can also <strong>insert your keywords into the  alternative text (alt txt) attribute</strong>. If you can, insert the same  description you used for the file name, minus the hyphens. So in the case of  the nonstick Madeleine pans photo, your alt text would read alt=“nonstick  Madeleine pans.” If your site uses the WordPress publishing platform you can  download a free plug-in (“SEO Friendly Images”) that automatically updates your  images with appropriate alt text attributes. You may also want to put your  keywords in the title attribute of your different images, though from a search  point of view that matters less than the alt text attribute.</li>
<li>Once you’ve optimized the code  within your images, <strong>consider what’s  immediately surrounding your photos</strong>. You want to at least see some text  that either describes or highly relates to the picture. The text could be a  caption, adjacent article or small blurb of information. Feel free to add some  text if none exists. Just make sure it contains your keyword phrase. The  content’s proximity to your photo will help the search engines identify your photo.  It also doesn’t hurt to have your images close to a page headline or subhead  containing your keywords.<strong></strong></li>
</ol>
<p><strong>What additional steps can you take to optimize a site for  image search?</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Make sure that the directory  holding your images</strong> <strong>can be accessed by search engine crawlers</strong>. Some webmasters have  barred access to this directory so other sites can’t publish their images. The  problem with this move is it keeps the images from appearing in image search  results. It’s ultimately up to you to decide whether keeping the directory open  is worth it, but at least be aware of how keeping it closed can limit your  traffic.</li>
<li><strong>Re-upload your photos on a  regular basis</strong>. Search engines prefer photos that have  recently been published to photos that have sat around for a while. While  technically you may be uploading files that have sat around for a while, the  timelier publishing date treats them as fresh.</li>
<li><strong>Post your images to photo  sharing sites like Flickr</strong>. This is a great way to boost  traffic to your site. Since Flickr has a lot of search engine authority, its  pages tend to rank high in image searches. Pair that with your ability to link  your Flickr pages to your website, and your potential for new visitors  increases.</li>
<li><strong>Let other websites publish your  photos</strong>. If other websites are interested in publishing  your photos to their sites, let them. Just require something in return. You  could, for example, request that they promote your site in captions under the  photos. The text could state that the photos came from your site, explain your  site, and include a link to your site. The more your site is promoted and  linked to, the better your search engine rankings will be.</li>
<li><strong>Encourage other websites to link  to your photos</strong>. If you are not comfortable with other  websites publishing your photos you can at least encourage them to link to your  photos. See if they will include your keywords in their anchor text, another  rankings booster.</li>
</ol>
<p>If  you employ these steps, or at least some of them, you will see both your image  search and universal search rankings improve. Then you will want to focus on  updating your site with highly relevant copy and photos that keep people coming  back.</p>
<p><em>Christine  Laubenstein works for <a href="http://www.wordstream.com/">WordStream</a>,  makers of SEO and <a href="http://www.wordstream.com/pay-per-click-software">pay  per click software</a> products. </em></p>

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DailySeoTip/~4/imqUjex9dC4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyseotip.com/how-to-optimize-your-site-for-image-search/613/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://dailyseotip.com/how-to-optimize-your-site-for-image-search/613/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
