<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Informatica Perspectives</title>
	
	<link>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives</link>
	<description>Perspectives from The Data Integration Company</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Does Business NEED To Be Involved? by John Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~3/BIw7lJo49AA/</link>
		<dc:creator>John Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/?p=531#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>Tom, we’re saying the same thing.  Your question “Does IT still need to be involved” is also a rhetorical question – you answered it yourself by saying that IT should be an enabler and catalyst – which of course means IT is still involved.

Informatica is actually ahead of its competitors in this regard and is about to leap even further ahead with Informatica 9 announcement. The idea of Self-Service integration is something that David and I wrote about in our ICC book in 2005.  Informatica’s On-Demand offering is yet another example of a capability that has been available for years – it enables business users to design, build and deploy integration solutions (for business intelligence, data synchronization, or data migration) without ever talking to a software engineer.  

Of course IT “experts” (system analysts, software engineers, data-base administrators, operations staff, etc.) still need to be involved – they are the ones that built the tools and are still working in the background to make sure they continue to operate efficiently.  They may however not be a visible since the business users can serve themselves directly using tools like On-Demand.  In short, IT in this context is acting as an enabler and catalyst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, we’re saying the same thing.  Your question “Does IT still need to be involved” is also a rhetorical question – you answered it yourself by saying that IT should be an enabler and catalyst – which of course means IT is still involved.</p>
<p>Informatica is actually ahead of its competitors in this regard and is about to leap even further ahead with Informatica 9 announcement. The idea of Self-Service integration is something that David and I wrote about in our ICC book in 2005.  Informatica’s On-Demand offering is yet another example of a capability that has been available for years – it enables business users to design, build and deploy integration solutions (for business intelligence, data synchronization, or data migration) without ever talking to a software engineer.  </p>
<p>Of course IT “experts” (system analysts, software engineers, data-base administrators, operations staff, etc.) still need to be involved – they are the ones that built the tools and are still working in the background to make sure they continue to operate efficiently.  They may however not be a visible since the business users can serve themselves directly using tools like On-Demand.  In short, IT in this context is acting as an enabler and catalyst.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~4/BIw7lJo49AA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/index.php/2009/11/02/does-business-need-to-be-involved/#comment-1971</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Business NEED To Be Involved? by Tom Debus</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~3/jH9fjgU1n10/</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Debus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/?p=531#comment-1970</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

while I share your conclusions and like the piece, in my recent experience the real question in terms of data integration, business intelligence and making smart use of existing information assets is: 

Does IT still need to be involved?

And that is not a rethorical question at all! Many of Informatica’s competitors in the integration and BI space actually have started to put that blunt thesis to the test. Why can’t we look at IT as the enabler and catalyst but turn over the execution into the same hands that are held accountable for a company’s success or failure?

...read on at http://blog.anvalad.com

Rgds
-Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>while I share your conclusions and like the piece, in my recent experience the real question in terms of data integration, business intelligence and making smart use of existing information assets is: </p>
<p>Does IT still need to be involved?</p>
<p>And that is not a rethorical question at all! Many of Informatica’s competitors in the integration and BI space actually have started to put that blunt thesis to the test. Why can’t we look at IT as the enabler and catalyst but turn over the execution into the same hands that are held accountable for a company’s success or failure?</p>
<p>&#8230;read on at <a href="http://blog.anvalad.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/blog.anvalad.com?referer=');">http://blog.anvalad.com</a></p>
<p>Rgds<br />
-Tom</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~4/jH9fjgU1n10" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/index.php/2009/11/02/does-business-need-to-be-involved/#comment-1970</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Business NEED To Be Involved? by Should IT be involved in Integration and BI projects? |</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~3/I4GVFKdEG_w/</link>
		<dc:creator>Should IT be involved in Integration and BI projects? |</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/?p=531#comment-1969</guid>
		<description>[...] IT be involved at all? written by Tom - November 6th, 2009 No comments yet. » In his recent post about the alignment of Business &amp; IT senior Informatica Perspective blogger John Schmidt asks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] IT be involved at all? written by Tom - November 6th, 2009 No comments yet. &#187; In his recent post about the alignment of Business &amp; IT senior Informatica Perspective blogger John Schmidt asks [&#8230;]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~4/I4GVFKdEG_w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/index.php/2009/11/02/does-business-need-to-be-involved/#comment-1969</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thomas Gebow by Stephen E. Luongo</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~3/qZaKtiMShlU/</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Luongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/?p=476#comment-1968</guid>
		<description>Hi, Tom.  Always wondered what you were doing these days.  Email me if you get a chance.  Let me know if you are going to be in the Philadelphia area any time soon.  I'd love to catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Tom.  Always wondered what you were doing these days.  Email me if you get a chance.  Let me know if you are going to be in the Philadelphia area any time soon.  I&#039;d love to catch up.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~4/qZaKtiMShlU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/index.php/2009/08/01/thomas-gebow/#comment-1968</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Business NEED To Be Involved? by Vish Agashe</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~3/kQ96IqeD2uU/</link>
		<dc:creator>Vish Agashe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/?p=531#comment-1959</guid>
		<description>John,

Nice article as always.

Of course, business needs to be involved. Existence of IT departments is because of “BUSINESS” and hence it is incumbent upon IT to understand what their role/responsibilities are as a service organization to the business.  Avoiding any initiatives or projects where there is no clear sponsorship and participation from business is one way to start getting business involved. 

One would think that with years of experience observing successful and failed IT projects, we as a community of professionals, would have learned that collaboration(across various parts of the organization) is key for any successful business initiative.  It is really important to work as a team to maximize the returns on any investment made in projects/activities. 

IT needs to clearly tie every single project/initiative into business goals. IT needs to have an agreement around perceived benefits from business before any project (MDM, Data Quality) or activity is undertaken. This agreement and buy in into initiatives will be evident by the extent to which business takes ownership and commits resources to the project.

Vish Agashe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Nice article as always.</p>
<p>Of course, business needs to be involved. Existence of IT departments is because of “BUSINESS” and hence it is incumbent upon IT to understand what their role/responsibilities are as a service organization to the business.  Avoiding any initiatives or projects where there is no clear sponsorship and participation from business is one way to start getting business involved. </p>
<p>One would think that with years of experience observing successful and failed IT projects, we as a community of professionals, would have learned that collaboration(across various parts of the organization) is key for any successful business initiative.  It is really important to work as a team to maximize the returns on any investment made in projects/activities. </p>
<p>IT needs to clearly tie every single project/initiative into business goals. IT needs to have an agreement around perceived benefits from business before any project (MDM, Data Quality) or activity is undertaken. This agreement and buy in into initiatives will be evident by the extent to which business takes ownership and commits resources to the project.</p>
<p>Vish Agashe</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~4/kQ96IqeD2uU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/index.php/2009/11/02/does-business-need-to-be-involved/#comment-1959</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What's In A Data Integration Cloud? by Brian J. Dooley</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~3/okMA6_mOXtQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian J. Dooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/?p=519#comment-1954</guid>
		<description>Darren--
   Interesting. From the comments, it looks like you might be having some problems with explanations. As it turns out, explaining complex IT technologies to executives is my business. I write reports for the likes of Gartner, Springboard, Cutter Consortium, etcetera. I also do white papers and case studies  for companies such as Attachmate, SumTotal and Enabling. I cam across your blog in researching a report related to this subject. If interested, please drop me a line.
Cheers,
BJ Dooley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren&#8211;<br />
   Interesting. From the comments, it looks like you might be having some problems with explanations. As it turns out, explaining complex IT technologies to executives is my business. I write reports for the likes of Gartner, Springboard, Cutter Consortium, etcetera. I also do white papers and case studies  for companies such as Attachmate, SumTotal and Enabling. I cam across your blog in researching a report related to this subject. If interested, please drop me a line.<br />
Cheers,<br />
BJ Dooley</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~4/okMA6_mOXtQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/index.php/2009/10/19/whats-in-a-cloud-analysts-say-itll-be-about-half-your-it-budget/#comment-1954</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Planning MDM And EDW With Dr. Kimball For 2010 by Julianna DeLua</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~3/dBeTLoKQyKg/</link>
		<dc:creator>Julianna DeLua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/?p=502#comment-1953</guid>
		<description>Amy, thanks for your comments.  The marketing team is coordinating this with Dr. Kimball.  We will be following up soon, hopefully in the next week or the week after.  You can contact me at jdelua@informatica.com in the interim if you have further questions.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy, thanks for your comments.  The marketing team is coordinating this with Dr. Kimball.  We will be following up soon, hopefully in the next week or the week after.  You can contact me at <a href="mailto:jdelua@informatica.com">jdelua@informatica.com</a> in the interim if you have further questions.  Thanks.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~4/dBeTLoKQyKg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/index.php/2009/09/21/planning-mdm-and-edw-with-dr-kimball-for-2010/#comment-1953</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Planning MDM And EDW With Dr. Kimball For 2010 by Amy Clark</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~3/JUmW9Jt-3aA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/?p=502#comment-1952</guid>
		<description>There was going to be a reply to the questions that remained unanswered from this webinar. Has it been sent or posted?  Didn't want to miss it...
thanks, 
Amy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was going to be a reply to the questions that remained unanswered from this webinar. Has it been sent or posted?  Didn&#039;t want to miss it&#8230;<br />
thanks,<br />
Amy</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~4/JUmW9Jt-3aA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/index.php/2009/09/21/planning-mdm-and-edw-with-dr-kimball-for-2010/#comment-1952</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Think Future, Act Now! by strategic change management</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~3/mZ84AEeJxic/</link>
		<dc:creator>strategic change management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/?p=515#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;strategic change management...&lt;/strong&gt;

Great post. My approach to strategic change management says the quality of the first five percent determines what happens in the rest of the process. This same principle applies to many situations....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>strategic change management&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Great post. My approach to strategic change management says the quality of the first five percent determines what happens in the rest of the process. This same principle applies to many situations&#8230;.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~4/mZ84AEeJxic" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/index.php/2009/10/06/think-future-act-now/#comment-1949</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EAI and Data Integration: Like 'Fitting Square Pegs in Round Holes' by Service-Oriented Architecture mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~3/HPB8jPtLa6w/</link>
		<dc:creator>Service-Oriented Architecture mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/?p=528#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>[...] around as you move the architecture forward.” I posted a summary of points raised in the Webinar here at the Perspectives site. posted by Joe McKendrick October 26, 2009 @ 1:00 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] around as you move the architecture forward.” I posted a summary of points raised in the Webinar here at the Perspectives site. posted by Joe McKendrick October 26, 2009 @ 1:00 [&#8230;]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForInformaticaPerspectives/~4/HPB8jPtLa6w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.informatica.com/perspectives/index.php/2009/10/16/eai-and-data-integration-like-fitting-square-pegs-in-round-holes/#comment-1946</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
