Comments for Australian Protectionist Party http://www.protectionist.net Australian Protectionists - Australians protecting Australia Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:41:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Protectionist party protest new mosque in Newcastle. by Nathanhttp://www.protectionist.net/2010/03/10/protectionist-party-protest-new-mosque-in-newcastle/#comment-12711 Nathan Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:41:24 +0000 http://www.protectionist.net/?p=1476#comment-12711 More then I can say for you who are merely taking the major party line of "Tough Shit". Thank you macca you have just shown the good people out there exactly what Australia is up against, from within our own ranks. More then I can say for you who are merely taking the major party line of "Tough Shit".

Thank you macca you have just shown the good people out there exactly what Australia is up against, from within our own ranks.

]]> Comment on Protectionist party protest new mosque in Newcastle. by Nathanhttp://www.protectionist.net/2010/03/10/protectionist-party-protest-new-mosque-in-newcastle/#comment-12710 Nathan Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:40:59 +0000 http://www.protectionist.net/?p=1476#comment-12710 It's not freedom if the creation of the mosque is against the law, and if the citizens are concern with their way of life. Ill not ask you this question Macca since I do not believe that you would give an honest answer but is there any person out there that owns a house in a residential suburb, who would want ANY large building built next to their property. Or have their area turned into a meeting ground where traffic, congestion and parking are all stretched to the limit. Then we have the housing professionals in the area who have stated quite matter of factly that the property value of the HOMES within a 1 km radius WILL decrease dramatically as has been seen in Sydney and Melbourne suburbs where mosques have been built. I can see macca that you have no empathy towards the residents of Elermore Vale. That you are not concerned with their worries. As I am pretty sure you do not live their. But we at the APP are their for them and their concerns. To help them through this worrying time as much as we are able. It's not freedom if the creation of the mosque is against the law, and if the citizens are concern with their way of life.

Ill not ask you this question Macca since I do not believe that you would give an honest answer but is there any person out there that owns a house in a residential suburb, who would want ANY large building built next to their property. Or have their area turned into a meeting ground where traffic, congestion and parking are all stretched to the limit.

Then we have the housing professionals in the area who have stated quite matter of factly that the property value of the HOMES within a 1 km radius WILL decrease dramatically as has been seen in Sydney and Melbourne suburbs where mosques have been built.

I can see macca that you have no empathy towards the residents of Elermore Vale. That you are not concerned with their worries. As I am pretty sure you do not live their. But we at the APP are their for them and their concerns. To help them through this worrying time as much as we are able.

]]> Comment on Will the unions wheel out “Tracey” to take on Rudd over his workplace reforms? by Johnhttp://www.protectionist.net/2010/03/08/will-the-unions-wheel-out-tracey-to-take-on-rudd-over-his-workplace-reforms/#comment-12709 John Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:39:35 +0000 http://www.protectionist.net/?p=1466#comment-12709 I must apologize for my inaccuracy of information. My above words are incorrect on the referendum on Queensland's constitution. I was forwarded a message today apparently from Larry Hannigan which stipulates that that information was not from him. So I must apoligize for not being correctly informed. I apologize to Larry also for not cross-referencing my source. I will endeavour to be be more careful next time. Sorry APP. Genuine mistake. I must apologize for my inaccuracy of information. My above words are incorrect on the referendum on Queensland’s constitution. I was forwarded a message today apparently from Larry Hannigan which stipulates that that information was not from him. So I must apoligize for not being correctly informed. I apologize to Larry also for not cross-referencing my source. I will endeavour to be be more careful next time. Sorry APP. Genuine mistake.

]]> Comment on African crime rates are being forced upon us by multicultural extremists by antonhttp://www.protectionist.net/2009/03/03/african-crime-rates-are-being-forced-upon-us-by-multicultural-extremists-2/#comment-12707 anton Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:13:18 +0000 http://www.protectionist.net/?p=199#comment-12707 Hi Roman Goddess. You make some very good points, a true refugee is a person stuck in a camp for several years in limbo without the finances to fund a boat trip to Australia. We all know this but Krudd still lets these " economic refugees in" With over 200,000 homeless Australians waiting for government housing I guarantee they are so frustrated when they are refused housing yet a refugee is let into Australia and gets subsidized or free housing immediately. Some of these so-called refugees who claim to be escaping certain death also return to their homelands for holidays? ....whats with that? We should refuse them re-entry upon returning to Australia. The whole politically correct system makes me want to vomit! Hi Roman Goddess. You make some very good points, a true refugee is a person stuck in a camp for several years in limbo without the finances to fund a boat trip to Australia. We all know this but Krudd still lets these " economic refugees in" With over 200,000 homeless Australians waiting for government housing I guarantee they are so frustrated when they are refused housing yet a refugee is let into Australia and gets subsidized or free housing immediately. Some of these so-called refugees who claim to be escaping certain death also return to their homelands for holidays? ….whats with that? We should refuse them re-entry upon returning to Australia. The whole politically correct system makes me want to vomit!

]]> Comment on APP begins mega membership drive: Free membership offer! by mariohttp://www.protectionist.net/2010/01/26/app-begins-mega-membership-drive-free-membership-offer/#comment-12705 mario Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:43:19 +0000 http://www.protectionist.net/?p=167#comment-12705 Every one i talk agrees with APP and what it stands for but think it to late HOW can we get the numbers Every one i talk agrees with APP and what it stands for but think it to late HOW can we get the numbers

]]> Comment on Protectionist party protest new mosque in Newcastle. by Maccahttp://www.protectionist.net/2010/03/10/protectionist-party-protest-new-mosque-in-newcastle/#comment-12701 Macca Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:33:25 +0000 http://www.protectionist.net/?p=1476#comment-12701 Its freedom and capitalism to create a Mosque. All you guys are so racist and discriminatory - there is no "moderate Muslim" - yeh sure mate, have you an 88 tattooed to your arm? Its freedom and capitalism to create a Mosque. All you guys are so racist and discriminatory – there is no "moderate Muslim" – yeh sure mate, have you an 88 tattooed to your arm?

]]> Comment on Islam Is Incompatible With Diversity by Shockadelichttp://www.protectionist.net/2010/03/12/islam-is-incompatible-with-diversity/#comment-12702 Shockadelic Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:33:14 +0000 http://www.protectionist.net/?p=1486#comment-12702 Let's not forget Christianity did pretty much the same things to the infidels, oops I mean "pagans" of many lands. But that was centuries ago, and Christianity has outgrown its adolescent brat phase, thanks no doubt to the Enlightenment and the spread of democracy and liberalism (in the original meaning of that word). These are European cultural developments and did not affect the Muslims, nor for that matter, East Asia (where we currently get more than half our immigrants from). We know Muslims don't get liberal democracy, but nobody questions whether Asians get it either, perhaps because their more pacifist religions make it seem like they're more 'liberal'. But democracy and liberalism are based on the concept that the individual has inherent rights, and most Asian cultures are not very individualist, putting the interests of family above the individual. Asians are pacifist collectivists, but not liberal democratic individualists. Don't be fooled by the fluffy clouds and peach tree paintings. Let's not forget Christianity did pretty much the same things to the infidels, oops I mean "pagans" of many lands. But that was centuries ago, and Christianity has outgrown its adolescent brat phase, thanks no doubt to the Enlightenment and the spread of democracy and liberalism (in the original meaning of that word).
These are European cultural developments and did not affect the Muslims, nor for that matter, East Asia (where we currently get more than half our immigrants from).
We know Muslims don't get liberal democracy, but nobody questions whether Asians get it either, perhaps because their more pacifist religions make it seem like they're more 'liberal'.
But democracy and liberalism are based on the concept that the individual has inherent rights, and most Asian cultures are not very individualist, putting the interests of family above the individual.
Asians are pacifist collectivists, but not liberal democratic individualists. Don't be fooled by the fluffy clouds and peach tree paintings.

]]> Comment on Islam Is Incompatible With Diversity by Maccahttp://www.protectionist.net/2010/03/12/islam-is-incompatible-with-diversity/#comment-12700 Macca Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:30:06 +0000 http://www.protectionist.net/?p=1486#comment-12700 This is a bit ridiculous. How about we look at how oppressive and destructive the Catholic Church was when it was in power and how we only got democracy and liberal freedom through anti-Church thought. This same process has taken longer to emerge in the middle east although it is beginning now (Iran) due to the West's exploitation and control of the region both economically and politically for 200 years. This is a bit ridiculous. How about we look at how oppressive and destructive the Catholic Church was when it was in power and how we only got democracy and liberal freedom through anti-Church thought. This same process has taken longer to emerge in the middle east although it is beginning now (Iran) due to the West's exploitation and control of the region both economically and politically for 200 years.

]]> Comment on Islam Is Incompatible With Diversity by localyokelhttp://www.protectionist.net/2010/03/12/islam-is-incompatible-with-diversity/#comment-12697 localyokel Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:39:08 +0000 http://www.protectionist.net/?p=1486#comment-12697 Islam did rule the world in history and slowly but surely is heading that way once again. Its ironic their strongest supporters are the once Buddhist nations of Indonesia and Malaysia that were invaded by Islam and yet continue to embrace its policies. Islam did rule the world in history and slowly but surely is heading that way once again. Its ironic their strongest supporters are the once Buddhist nations of Indonesia and Malaysia that were invaded by Islam and yet continue to embrace its policies.

]]> Comment on Islam Is Incompatible With Diversity by Rachel Emmeshttp://www.protectionist.net/2010/03/12/islam-is-incompatible-with-diversity/#comment-12696 Rachel Emmes Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:28:02 +0000 http://www.protectionist.net/?p=1486#comment-12696 The Islamic fundamentalist cult is no longer confined to the Middle East, it has spread throughout Europe and very healthy in the USA. The only democratic obstacle is Israel and the only means of defense for western democracy is with Israel. Israel slowed the Iranian neuclear program by bombing their installations 10 years ago but that only slowed Iran down who have now pick up ground. Does Israel have to do it again and be condemned by the UN or will the UN take this on? Rachel Emmes <a href="http://www.aussieswannakiss.com" target="_blank">www.aussieswannakiss.com</a> The Islamic fundamentalist cult is no longer confined to the Middle East, it has spread throughout Europe and very healthy in the USA. The only democratic obstacle is Israel and the only means of defense for western democracy is with Israel. Israel slowed the Iranian neuclear program by bombing their installations 10 years ago but that only slowed Iran down who have now pick up ground. Does Israel have to do it again and be condemned by the UN or will the UN take this on?

Rachel Emmes
http://www.aussieswannakiss.com

]]>