<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Colloquy : Northwestern University Law Review</title>
<link>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/</link>
<description />
<language>en-US</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:35:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.typepad.com/</generator>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview" /><feedburner:info uri="colloquynorthwesternuniversitylawreview" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
<title>Catch Twenty-&lt;i&gt;Wu&lt;/i&gt;? The Oral Argument in &lt;i&gt;Fisher v. University of Texas&lt;/i&gt; and the Obfuscation of Critical Mass</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/Q9WNM52duQM/catch-twenty-wu.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2013/04/catch-twenty-wu.html</guid>


<category>Author: Lyke, Sheldon</category>
<category>Topic: Affirmative Action</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Theory</category>
<category>Topic: Fourteenth Amendment</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:35:31 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Sheldon Bernard Lyke* [download pdf] Introduction On October 10, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin[1]—the latest challenge to race-conscious affirmative action university admissions programs.[2] Court watchers highlighted...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/Q9WNM52duQM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2013/04/catch-twenty-wu.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>The Original Public Meaning of the Foreign Emoluments Clause: A Reply to Professor Zephyr Teachout</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/I7bvOEhfFW0/original-public-meaning-of-the-foreign-emoluments-clause.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2013/04/original-public-meaning-of-the-foreign-emoluments-clause.html</guid>


<category>Author: Tillman, Seth Barrett</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Theory</category>
<category>Topic: Law &amp; Philosophy</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:33:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Seth Barrett Tillman* Editor's Note: This Essay is Part III of an exchange between Professors Seth Barrett Tillman and Zephyr Teachout on public corruption, policy, and the scope of the constitutional anti-corruption principle. Part I of the exchange is available...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/I7bvOEhfFW0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2013/04/original-public-meaning-of-the-foreign-emoluments-clause.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>&lt;em&gt;Erie&lt;/em&gt;'s International Effect</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/Z4ARiRD-HC0/eries-international-effect.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/12/eries-international-effect.html</guid>


<category>Author: Green, Michael Steven</category>
<category>Topic: Civil Procedure</category>
<category>Topic: Jurisdiction</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:10:03 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Michael Steven Green* [download pdf] In his important article, When Erie Goes International, Professor Childress addresses the marvelous question of the Erie doctrine's application in an international context.[1] In particular, Childress argues that Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.,[2]...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/Z4ARiRD-HC0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/12/eries-international-effect.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>The Contraception Mandate</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/Su0ec_10Xs8/contraception-mandate.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/11/contraception-mandate.html</guid>


<category>Author: Corbin, Caroline Mala</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Theory</category>
<category>Topic: Family Law</category>
<category>Topic: Fourteenth Amendment</category>
<category>Topic: Politics &amp; Legislation</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:12:47 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Caroline Mala Corbin* [download pdf] Health care in the United States is undergoing a sea change thanks to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.[1] Among the many firsts: employers that offer health insurance must cover certain preventive services for...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/Su0ec_10Xs8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/11/contraception-mandate.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>&lt;i&gt;Grutter&lt;/i&gt;'s Denouement: Three Templates from the Roberts Court</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/9TocVZ8Z4go/grutters-denouement.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/10/grutters-denouement.html</guid>


<category>Author: Katz, Ellen D.</category>
<category>Topic: Affirmative Action</category>
<category>Topic: Education Law</category>
<category>Topic: Law &amp; Philosophy</category>
<category>Topic: Legal Education</category>
<category>Topic: Politics &amp; Legislation</category>
<category>Topic: Supreme Court</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 10:34:19 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Ellen D. Katz* [download pdf] This month, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin,[1] a case that is widely expected to end race-based affirmative action in higher education. A decade ago, Grutter v....&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/9TocVZ8Z4go" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/10/grutters-denouement.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Reviving &lt;i&gt;National Muffler&lt;/i&gt;: Analyzing the Effect of &lt;i&gt;Mayo Foundation&lt;/i&gt; on Judicial Deference as Applied to General Tax Authority Guidance</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/JNRTSN_i8LE/reviving-national-muffler.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/08/reviving-national-muffler.html</guid>


<category>Author: Friedman, Matthew H.</category>
<category>Topic: Administrative Law</category>
<category>Topic: Separation of Powers</category>
<category>Topic: Tax Law</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:30:33 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Matthew H. Friedman* [download pdf] Introduction The topic of judicial deference arises each time a court reviews the legitimacy of an opinion or regulation by an administrative agency to which Congress has delegated some rulemaking authority. Determining the appropriate deference...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/JNRTSN_i8LE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/08/reviving-national-muffler.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>A Tort Statute, with Aliens and Pirates</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/B-udkrdDrqU/a-tort-statute-with-aliens-and-pirates.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/08/a-tort-statute-with-aliens-and-pirates.html</guid>


<category>Author: Kontorovich, Eugene</category>
<category>Topic: Admiralty Law</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Theory</category>
<category>Topic: Corporate Law</category>
<category>Topic: Statutory Interpretation</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:07:13 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Eugene Kontorovich* [download pdf] The pirates of the Caribbean are back—not in another fantastical film, but in the litigation over the reach of the Alien Tort Statute (ATS). For the first time since a wave of maritime predation in the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/B-udkrdDrqU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/08/a-tort-statute-with-aliens-and-pirates.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Moderating &lt;i&gt;Mayo&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/RFzg7xHgfco/moderating-mayo.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/07/moderating-mayo.html</guid>


<category>Author: Chao, Bernard</category>
<category>Topic: Intellectual Property Law</category>
<category>Topic: Patent Law</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:30:46 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Bernard Chao* [download pdf] Introduction Patent law has long held that laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas are not patentable. At the same time, many patents cover applications that grow out of these fundamental concepts. Courts have recognized...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/RFzg7xHgfco" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/07/moderating-mayo.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Affirmative Action, Justice Kennedy, and the Virtues of the Middle Ground</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/XZ4cwgJ5aDI/affirmative-action-justice-kennedy-and-the-virtues-of-the-middle-ground.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/07/affirmative-action-justice-kennedy-and-the-virtues-of-the-middle-ground.html</guid>


<category>Author: Rostron, Allen</category>
<category>Topic: Affirmative Action</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Supreme Court</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:47:10 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Allen Rostron* [download pdf] When the Supreme Court hears arguments this fall about the constitutionality of affirmative action policies at the University of Texas,[1] attention will be focused once again on Justice Anthony Kennedy. With the rest of the Court...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/XZ4cwgJ5aDI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/07/affirmative-action-justice-kennedy-and-the-virtues-of-the-middle-ground.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Free Speech and Public Space After Occupy Wall Street</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/luFaQfh3odw/free-speech-and-public-space-after-occupy-wall-street.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/07/free-speech-and-public-space-after-occupy-wall-street.html</guid>


<category>Author: Dorf, Michael</category>
<category>Author: Zick, Timothy</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Theory</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:23:08 -0500</pubDate>

<description>On February 28th, 2012, the Northwestern Law Review hosted a discussion between Professors Michael Dorf and Timothy Zick on the Occupy Wall Street movement, moderated by Colloquy Editor Michael Downey. What follows is a transcription of their conversation. Colloquy: Thank...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/luFaQfh3odw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/07/free-speech-and-public-space-after-occupy-wall-street.html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss><!-- ph=1 -->
