<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Colloquy : Northwestern University Law Review</title>
<link>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/</link>
<description />
<language>en-US</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.typepad.com/</generator>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Professionalizing Moral Engagement (A Response to Michael Hatfield)</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/6_gZ14DxJsE/professionalizing-moral-engagement-a-response-to-michael-hatfield.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/06/professionalizing-moral-engagement-a-response-to-michael-hatfield.html</guid>


<category>Author: Vischer, Robert K.</category>
<category>Topic: Legal Practice</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Robert K. Vischer[*] [download pdf] In Professionalizing Moral Deference, Michael Hatfield argues that the way we form lawyers “begins with moral desensitization,” a technique that teaches future lawyers “to override [their] moral intuition.”[1] In making his case, Hatfield offers the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/6_gZ14DxJsE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/06/professionalizing-moral-engagement-a-response-to-michael-hatfield.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Imperfect Oaths, the Primed President, and an Abundance of Constitutional Caution</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/PRFm80_yf4o/imperfect-oaths-the-primed-president-and-an-abundance-of-constitutional-caution.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/06/imperfect-oaths-the-primed-president-and-an-abundance-of-constitutional-caution.html</guid>


<category>Author: Peabody, Bruce</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Presidential Transition</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:30:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Bruce Peabody[*] [download pdf] Introduction Presidential inaugurations frequently invite widespread civic celebration, the broad rhetoric of an incoming Chief Executive, and traditions stretching back for decades and even centuries. The inaugural ceremonies of January 20, 2009 offered all this and...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/PRFm80_yf4o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/06/imperfect-oaths-the-primed-president-and-an-abundance-of-constitutional-caution.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Professionalizing Moral Deference</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/UJAIlrvUCog/professionalizing-moral-deference.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/05/professionalizing-moral-deference.html</guid>


<category>Author: Hatfield, Michael</category>
<category>Topic: Legal Practice</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Michael Hatfield[*] [download pdf] I. The Torture Memo As I write this Essay, legal memoranda about torture, once again, are headline news.[1] This Essay considers these memoranda. However, this Essay does not address the legality of torture or the legal...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/UJAIlrvUCog" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/05/professionalizing-moral-deference.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Lessons Learned from &lt;em&gt;Forest Grove School District v. T.A.&lt;/em&gt;: How the Supreme Court Can Refine the Approach to Private School Tuition Reimbursement Under the IDEA</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/Sp_fxWwBq_w/lessons-learned-from-forest-grove-school-district-v-tahow-the-supreme-court-can-refine-the-approach-.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/05/lessons-learned-from-forest-grove-school-district-v-tahow-the-supreme-court-can-refine-the-approach-.html</guid>


<category>Author: Baron, Courtney Rachel</category>
<category>Topic: Education Law</category>
<category>Topic: Supreme Court</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 22:00:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Courtney Rachel Baron[*] [download pdf] I. Introduction On April 28, 2009, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Forest Grove School District v. T.A.,[1] a case that addresses a deeply contested issue in special education litigation. Reviewing the Ninth Circuit’s...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/Sp_fxWwBq_w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/05/lessons-learned-from-forest-grove-school-district-v-tahow-the-supreme-court-can-refine-the-approach-.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>The Synergy of Early Offers and Medical Explanations/Apologies</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/w27kURN2YVc/the-synergy-of-early-offers-and-medical-explanationsapologies.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/05/the-synergy-of-early-offers-and-medical-explanationsapologies.html</guid>


<category>Author: Robinette, Christopher J.</category>
<category>Topic: Medical Malpractice</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 22:00:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Christopher J. Robinette[*] [download pdf] Introduction Medical malpractice law has been subjected to strong criticism by both medical and legal commentators.[1] It has been challenged as inefficient,[2] inaccurate,[3] and even counterproductive.[4] Although many reforms have been proposed, most tend to...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/w27kURN2YVc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/05/the-synergy-of-early-offers-and-medical-explanationsapologies.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Eight Is Enough</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/VHrRPwjPtIA/eight-is-enough.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/05/eight-is-enough.html</guid>


<category>Author: Cahn, Naomi R.</category>
<category>Author: Collins, Jennifer M.</category>
<category>Topic: Family Law</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 22:45:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Naomi R. Cahn &amp; Jennifer M. Collins[*] [download pdf] Introduction On January 26, 2009, the nation’s second set of live-born octuplets was delivered at a California hospital.[1] The public fascination with this unusual event quickly turned ugly when the media...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/VHrRPwjPtIA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/05/eight-is-enough.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Mitigating Dysfunctional Deference Through Improvements in Board Composition and Board Effectiveness</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/90Xkc0KmsOQ/mitigating-dysfunctional-deference-through-improvements-in-board-composition-and-board-effectiveness.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/05/mitigating-dysfunctional-deference-through-improvements-in-board-composition-and-board-effectiveness.html</guid>


<category>Author: Goldstein, Marc</category>
<category>Topic: Corporate Law</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 09:00:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Marc Goldstein[*] [download pdf] Introduction In two recent articles, Bernard S. Sharfman and Steven J. Toll argue that cases of corporate malfeasance, such as the failure by Enron's board to prevent the fraudulent actions of its top executives, can be...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/90Xkc0KmsOQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/05/mitigating-dysfunctional-deference-through-improvements-in-board-composition-and-board-effectiveness.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Administrative Note: Finals</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/gKCktBy0Gkg/administrative-note-finals.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/04/administrative-note-finals.html</guid>


<category>Colloquy: Administration</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:30:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>The Colloquy is taking a brief respite for finals. We will return next week with a piece by Marc Goldstein entitled Mitigating Dysfunctional Deference through Improvements in Board Composition and Board Effectiveness. The article is part of our colloquy on...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/gKCktBy0Gkg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/04/administrative-note-finals.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Keeping the Label Out of the Case</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/xqKB3d6fOdM/keeping-the-label-out-of-the-case.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/04/keeping-the-label-out-of-the-case.html</guid>


<category>Author: Bownas, Pearson</category>
<category>Author: Herrmann, Mark</category>
<category>Topic: Administrative Law</category>
<category>Topic: Medical Malpractice</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:00:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Mark Herrmann[*] &amp; Pearson Bownas[**] [download pdf] Introduction The FDA approves prescription drugs and medical devices for only the specific uses indicated in the product labeling that the manufacturer submits in the approval process. A physician may determine, however, that...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/xqKB3d6fOdM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/04/keeping-the-label-out-of-the-case.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Quick Off the Mark? In Favor of Empowering the President-Elect</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/REzorZYzv3M/quick-off-the-mark-in-favor-of-empowering-the-presidentelect.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/04/quick-off-the-mark-in-favor-of-empowering-the-presidentelect.html</guid>


<category>Author: Mendelson, Nina A.</category>
<category>Topic: Presidential Transition</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:45:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Nina A. Mendelson[*] [download pdf] Introduction The United States’s presidential transition period is too long. Between November 7, 2008, and January 20, 2009, the media quickly identified a “‘leadership vacuum.’”[1] In contrast to those of President-elect Obama, President Bush’s approval...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/REzorZYzv3M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/04/quick-off-the-mark-in-favor-of-empowering-the-presidentelect.html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:from_kauri -->
