<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Colloquy : Northwestern University Law Review</title>
<link>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/</link>
<description />
<language>en-US</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:04:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.typepad.com/</generator>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview" /><feedburner:info uri="colloquynorthwesternuniversitylawreview" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
<title>Getting at Recess Appointments</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/vPAeQcGDyfA/getting-at-recess-appointments.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/01/getting-at-recess-appointments.html</guid>


<category>Author: Kalt, Brian C.</category>
<category>Author: Tillman, Seth Barrett</category>
<category>Topic: Appointment Clause</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Executive Power</category>
<category>Topic: Separation of Powers</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:04:44 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Just weeks ago, President Obama announced that he would use a recess appointment to make Richard Cordray the director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. Cordray had been nominated to the post months earlier, but Senate Republicans blocked his...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/vPAeQcGDyfA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/01/getting-at-recess-appointments.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Religion and Race: The Ministerial Exception Reexamined</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/HbU_tTreEVo/religion-and-race-the-ministerial-exception-reexamined.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/12/religion-and-race-the-ministerial-exception-reexamined.html</guid>


<category>Author: Bartrum, Ian</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Establishment Clause</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 16:26:15 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Ian Bartrum* Editor's Note: This essay is the fifth in a five-part series on Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church &amp; School v. EEOC, a major religion case currently pending in the Supreme Court. For the first time, the Court may squarely...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/HbU_tTreEVo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/12/religion-and-race-the-ministerial-exception-reexamined.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Religious Freedom, Church–State Separation, and the Ministerial Exception</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/CLh39garOdg/religious-freedom-church-state-separation-and-the-ministerial-exception.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/12/religious-freedom-church-state-separation-and-the-ministerial-exception.html</guid>


<category>Author: Berg, Thomas C.</category>
<category>Author: Colby, Kimberlee Wood</category>
<category>Author: Esbeck, Carl H.</category>
<category>Author: Garnett, Richard W.</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:18:38 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Thomas C. Berg*; Kimberlee Wood Colby**; Carl H. Esbeck***; Richard W. Garnett**** Editor's Note: This essay is the fourth in a five-part series on Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church &amp; School v. EEOC, a major religion case currently pending in the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/CLh39garOdg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/12/religious-freedom-church-state-separation-and-the-ministerial-exception.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Act III of the Ministerial Exception</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/6GFtKwQ-YhM/act-iii-of-the-ministerial-exception.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/12/act-iii-of-the-ministerial-exception.html</guid>


<category>Author: Horwitz, Paul</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:18:41 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Paul Horwitz* Editor's Note: This essay is the third in a five-part series on Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church &amp; School v. EEOC, a major religion case currently pending in the Supreme Court. For the first time, the Court may squarely...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/6GFtKwQ-YhM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/12/act-iii-of-the-ministerial-exception.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Physician, Heal Thyself: Discretion and the Problem of Excessive Prosecutorial Caseloads, a Response to Adam Gershowitz and Laura Killinger</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/OsMM9FvIqMc/physician-heal-thyself-discretion-and-the-problem-of-excessive-prosecutorial-caseloads-a-response-to.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/11/physician-heal-thyself-discretion-and-the-problem-of-excessive-prosecutorial-caseloads-a-response-to.html</guid>


<category>Author: Bowers, Josh</category>
<category>Topic: Legal Practice</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:03:26 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Josh Bowers* Editor's Note: This Essay is a response to Adam M. Gershowitz &amp; Laura R. Killinger, The State (Never) Rests: How Excessive Prosecutorial Caseloads Harm Criminal Defendants, 105 Nw. U. L. Rev. 261 (2011). [download pdf] I applaud Adam...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/OsMM9FvIqMc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/11/physician-heal-thyself-discretion-and-the-problem-of-excessive-prosecutorial-caseloads-a-response-to.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Sacrificing Quantity for Quality: Better Focusing Prosecutors’ Scarce Resources</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/5rzSrNQ-0Dw/sacrificing-quantity-for-quality-better-focusing-prosecutors-scarce-resources.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/11/sacrificing-quantity-for-quality-better-focusing-prosecutors-scarce-resources.html</guid>


<category>Author: Bibas, Stephanos</category>
<category>Topic: Legal Practice</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:28:32 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Stephanos Bibas* Editor's Note: This Essay is a response to Adam M. Gershowitz &amp; Laura R. Killinger, The State (Never) Rests: How Excessive Prosecutorial Caseloads Harm Criminal Defendants, 105 Nw. U. L. Rev. 261 (2011). [download pdf] Adam Gershowitz and...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/5rzSrNQ-0Dw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/11/sacrificing-quantity-for-quality-better-focusing-prosecutors-scarce-resources.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Hosanna-Tabor and Supreme Court Precedent: An Analysis of the Ministerial Exception in the Context of the Supreme Court’s Hands-Off Approach to Religious Doctrine</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/NEC_iJbW77Q/hosanna-tabor-and-supreme-court-precedent-an-analysis-of-the-ministerial-exception-in-the-context-of.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/11/hosanna-tabor-and-supreme-court-precedent-an-analysis-of-the-ministerial-exception-in-the-context-of.html</guid>


<category>Author: Levine, Samuel J.</category>
<category>Topic: Establishment Clause</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>
<category>Topic: Religion</category>
<category>Topic: Supreme Court</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:30:28 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Samuel J. Levine Editor's Note: This essay is the second in a five-part series on Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church &amp; School v. EEOC, a major religion case currently pending in the Supreme Court. For the first time, the Court may...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/NEC_iJbW77Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/11/hosanna-tabor-and-supreme-court-precedent-an-analysis-of-the-ministerial-exception-in-the-context-of.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Rethinking Extraordinary Circumstances</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/Lnqvs-DHbwU/rethinking-extraordinary-circumstances.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/11/rethinking-extraordinary-circumstances.html</guid>


<category>Author: Dodson, Scott</category>
<category>Topic: Civil Procedure</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:59:57 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Scott Dodson[*] [download pdf] Introduction Normally, the entry of an unappealed final judgment ends the case forever, even if later developments undermine faith in the accuracy of the decision or the fairness of its procedural grounds. Litigation must have an...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/Lnqvs-DHbwU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/11/rethinking-extraordinary-circumstances.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>The Irony of Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church &amp; School v. EEOC</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/FL-2hHHos5o/the-irony-of-hosanna-tabor-evangelical-lutheran-church-school-v-eeoc.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/10/the-irony-of-hosanna-tabor-evangelical-lutheran-church-school-v-eeoc.html</guid>


<category>Author: Corbin, Caroline Mala</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Employment Law</category>
<category>Topic: Establishment Clause</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:21:49 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Caroline Mala Corbin Editor's Note: This essay is the first in a five-part series on Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church &amp; School v. EEOC, a major religion case currently pending in the Supreme Court. For the first time, the Court may...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/FL-2hHHos5o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/10/the-irony-of-hosanna-tabor-evangelical-lutheran-church-school-v-eeoc.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>When May a President Refuse to Defend a Statute?  The Obama Administration and DOMA</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/HSpJw78nPSc/when-may-a-president-refuse-to-defend-a-statute-the-obama-administration-and-doma.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/10/when-may-a-president-refuse-to-defend-a-statute-the-obama-administration-and-doma.html</guid>


<category>Author: Ball, Carlos A.</category>
<category>Topic: Defense of Marriage Act</category>
<category>Topic: Executive Power</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:02:53 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Carlos A. Ball[*] [download pdf] Presidents sometimes make the controversial decision not to defend a federal statute they believe is unconstitutional.[1] It may be tempting, when assessing the appropriateness of these decisions, to adopt one of two categorical positions: either...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/HSpJw78nPSc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/10/when-may-a-president-refuse-to-defend-a-statute-the-obama-administration-and-doma.html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss><!-- ph=1 -->

