<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Colloquy : Northwestern University Law Review</title>
<link>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/</link>
<description />
<language>en-US</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:15:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.typepad.com/</generator>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
<title>Symposium: The Future of Law and Development, Part II</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/Znq7R3D5EfA/symposium-the-future-of-law-and-development-part-ii.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/11/symposium-the-future-of-law-and-development-part-ii.html</guid>


<category>Author: Cioffi, John</category>
<category>Author: Franck, Susan D.</category>
<category>Author: Prado, Mariana</category>
<category>Topic: Law and Development</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:15:00 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Mariana Prado, Susan D. Franck, &amp; John Cioffi [download pdf] Should We Adopt a “What Works” Approach in Law and Development? Mariana Prado[*] My comments will be mostly connected to Tom’s third question, relating to the future,[1] and I would...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/Znq7R3D5EfA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/11/symposium-the-future-of-law-and-development-part-ii.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Symposium: The Future of Law and Development, Part I</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/BFwrcUQL-Cs/symposium-the-future-of-law-and-development-part-i.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/10/symposium-the-future-of-law-and-development-part-i.html</guid>


<category>Author: Gelpern, Anna</category>
<category>Author: Ginsburg, Tom</category>
<category>Author: Mehra, Salil</category>
<category>Author: Pistor, Katharina</category>
<category>Topic: Law and Development</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<enclosure url="http://www.abanet.org/antitrust/at-bb/audio/09/AT90701.mp3" type="audio/mpeg" length="10984824" />

<description>Tom Ginsburg, Salil Mehra, Katharina Pistor, &amp; Anna Gelpern [download pdf] The Future of Law and Development Tom Ginsburg[*] Welcome to the Law and Development blog symposium! We are thrilled to have a fantastic array of participants lined up and...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/BFwrcUQL-Cs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/10/symposium-the-future-of-law-and-development-part-i.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Missing the Mark: An Overlooked Statute Redefines the Debate over Statutory Interpretation</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/7hNcdMF-_mg/missing-the-mark-an-overlooked-statute-redefines-the-debate-over-statutory-interpretation.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/10/missing-the-mark-an-overlooked-statute-redefines-the-debate-over-statutory-interpretation.html</guid>


<category>Author: Blatt, William S.</category>
<category>Topic: Statutory Interpretation</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:15:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>William S. Blatt[*] [download pdf] Scholars have long debated the merits of various theories for interpreting statutes. On one side, textualists argue for close adherence to text. On the other side are those who interpret statutes by reference to legislative...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/7hNcdMF-_mg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/10/missing-the-mark-an-overlooked-statute-redefines-the-debate-over-statutory-interpretation.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Thoughts on the Churn Law</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/ry3YtFMVw64/thoughts-on-the-churn-law.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/09/thoughts-on-the-churn-law.html</guid>


<category>Author: Halley, Michael</category>
<category>Topic: ADA</category>
<category>Topic: Law &amp; Philosophy</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:15:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Michael Halley[*] [download pdf] Introduction A grand alliance is forming, and new trenches are being dug on the old and hallowed battleground of the Constitution. Waving the stars and stripes of “constitutional design,”[1] and richly equipping themselves with the weaponry...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/ry3YtFMVw64" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/09/thoughts-on-the-churn-law.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Why We Should Ignore the "Octomom"</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/sADYr6NpHYQ/why-we-should-ignore-the-octomom.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/09/why-we-should-ignore-the-octomom.html</guid>


<category>Author: Krawiec, Kimberly D.</category>
<category>Topic: Family Law</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:00:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Kimberly D. Krawiec[*] [download pdf] I. Introduction Few familiar with the story of Nadya Suleman­­—a single, low-income, California mother of six who recently gave birth to octuplets conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF)—do not instinctively react with outrage.[1] Fourteen children...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/sADYr6NpHYQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/09/why-we-should-ignore-the-octomom.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Who Decides What Number of Children is "Right"?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/QAQBTmMLqqw/who-decides-what-number-of-children-is-right.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/09/who-decides-what-number-of-children-is-right.html</guid>


<category>Author: Carbone, June</category>
<category>Topic: Family Law</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:30:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>June Carbone[*] [download pdf] I agree with Professors Cahn and Collins that “eight is enough.”[1] I am perhaps more skeptical than they are about assisting Nadya Suleman, a mother who already has six children, to have more. I wonder whose...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/QAQBTmMLqqw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/09/who-decides-what-number-of-children-is-right.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>&lt;em&gt;Summum&lt;/em&gt; and the Establishment Clause</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/7kNvP91GREg/summum-and-the-establishment-clause.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/08/summum-and-the-establishment-clause.html</guid>


<category>Author: Meyler, Bernadette</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>
<category>Topic: Religion</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:30:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Bernadette Meyler[*] [download pdf] Chief Justice Roberts: [T]he more you say that the monument is Government speech to get out of the first, free speech—the Free Speech Clause, the more it seems to me you’re walking into a trap under...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/7kNvP91GREg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/08/summum-and-the-establishment-clause.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Property and Speech in &lt;em&gt;Summum&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/p7j-CCGDp8E/joseph-blocher----download-pdf----introduction----city-of-pleasant-grove-v-summum1--is-by-its-own-reckoning-a-case.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/08/joseph-blocher----download-pdf----introduction----city-of-pleasant-grove-v-summum1--is-by-its-own-reckoning-a-case.html</guid>


<category>Author: Blocher, Joseph</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>
<category>Topic: Religion</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:15:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Joseph Blocher[*] [download pdf] Introduction City of Pleasant Grove v. Summum[1] is, by its own reckoning, a case about government speech under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.[2] Even so, most commentary has justifiably focused on the decision’s...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/p7j-CCGDp8E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/08/joseph-blocher----download-pdf----introduction----city-of-pleasant-grove-v-summum1--is-by-its-own-reckoning-a-case.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Privatizing and Publicizing Speech</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/6bD_V4pFrcI/privatizing-and-publicizing-speech.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/08/privatizing-and-publicizing-speech.html</guid>


<category>Author: Tebbe, Nelson</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>
<category>Topic: Religion</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:45:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Nelson Tebbe[*] [download pdf] I. When should we allow governments to deploy private-law rules in order to circumvent public-law obligations? Two cases this year call that question to mind. They ask the Supreme Court to explore interactions between property law...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/6bD_V4pFrcI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/08/privatizing-and-publicizing-speech.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Deference to Clients and Obedience to Law: The Ethics of the Torture Lawyers (A Response to Professor Hatfield)</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/83PazUwLWog/deference-to-clients-and-obedience-to-law-the-ethics-of-the-torture-lawyers-a-response-to-professor-.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/08/deference-to-clients-and-obedience-to-law-the-ethics-of-the-torture-lawyers-a-response-to-professor-.html</guid>


<category>Author: Wendel, W. Bradley</category>
<category>Topic: Legal Practice</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 22:45:00 -0500</pubDate>

<description>W. Bradley Wendel[*] [download pdf] I. Introduction In the early months of the Obama administration, we are learning a great deal more about the previous administration’s program of using “enhanced interrogation techniques” on alleged al-Qaeda detainees.[1] On April 16, 2009,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/83PazUwLWog" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2009/08/deference-to-clients-and-obedience-to-law-the-ethics-of-the-torture-lawyers-a-response-to-professor-.html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:from_kauri -->
