<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Colloquy : Northwestern University Law Review</title>
<link>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/</link>
<description />
<language>en-US</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:58:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.typepad.com/</generator>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview" /><feedburner:info uri="colloquynorthwesternuniversitylawreview" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
<title>A Modest Memoir: Justice Stevens's Supreme Court Life</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/dceagCeCj_o/a-modest-memoir-justice-stevenss-supreme-court-life.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/06/a-modest-memoir-justice-stevenss-supreme-court-life.html</guid>


<category>Author: Ray, Laura Krugman</category>
<category>Books</category>
<category>Topic: Supreme Court</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:58:07 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Laura Krugman Ray* [download pdf] The title of Justice John Paul Stevens's new book, Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir, tells us several things about the author before we have read a single page. By deflecting attention from the author...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/dceagCeCj_o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/06/a-modest-memoir-justice-stevenss-supreme-court-life.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Citizens United and the Scope of Professor Teachout's Anti-Corruption Principle</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/_GGLVqkaqc0/citizens-united-and-the-scope-of-professor-teachouts-anti-corruption-principle.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/04/citizens-united-and-the-scope-of-professor-teachouts-anti-corruption-principle.html</guid>


<category>Author: Tillman, Seth Barrett</category>
<category>Topic: Campaign Finance</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Theory</category>
<category>Topic: Executive Power</category>
<category>Topic: Politics &amp; Legislation</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:37:43 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Seth Barrett Tillman * Editor's Note: This Essay is Part I of an exchange between Professors Seth Barrett Tillman and Zephyr Teachout on public corruption, policy, and the scope of the constitutional anti-corruption principle. Professor Teachout's response is forthcoming on...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/_GGLVqkaqc0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/04/citizens-united-and-the-scope-of-professor-teachouts-anti-corruption-principle.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Justifying Diversity in the Federal Judiciary</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/_SfXVtDEQWc/justifying-diversity-in-the-federal-judiciary.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/04/justifying-diversity-in-the-federal-judiciary.html</guid>


<category>Author: Tobias, Carl</category>
<category>Topic: Executive Power</category>
<category>Topic: Law &amp; Philosophy</category>
<category>Topic: Politics &amp; Legislation</category>
<category>Topic: Supreme Court</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:12:12 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Carl Tobias* Editor's Note: This Essay is a response to Nancy Scherer, Diversifying the Federal Bench: Is Universal Legitimacy for the U.S. Justice System Possible? , 105 NW. U. L. Rev. 587 (2011). [download pdf] Introduction Professor Nancy Scherer has...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/_SfXVtDEQWc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/04/justifying-diversity-in-the-federal-judiciary.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Why Congress Did Not Think About the Constitution When Enacting the Affordable Care Act</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/ivsmE1Ok23c/why-congress-did-not-think-about-the-constitution-when-enacting-the-affordable-care-act.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/03/why-congress-did-not-think-about-the-constitution-when-enacting-the-affordable-care-act.html</guid>


<category>Author: Devins, Neal</category>
<category>Current Affairs</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Politics &amp; Legislation</category>
<category>Topic: Separation of Powers</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:28:39 -0500</pubDate>

<description>Neal Devins* [download pdf] Introduction Over the next few months, the Supreme Court will spend far more time thinking about the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)[1] than Congress did when enacting the ACA. Lawmakers largely...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/ivsmE1Ok23c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/03/why-congress-did-not-think-about-the-constitution-when-enacting-the-affordable-care-act.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Do the Right Thing: Understanding the Interest-Convergence Thesis</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/8EcR9wrjtzY/do-the-right-thing-understanding-the-interest-convergence-thesis.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/03/do-the-right-thing-understanding-the-interest-convergence-thesis.html</guid>


<category>Author: Feldman, Stephen M.</category>
<category>Topic: Critical Race Theory</category>
<category>Topic: Law &amp; Philosophy</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:05:49 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Stephen M. Feldman* Editor's Note: This Essay is a response to Justin Driver, Rethinking the Interest-Convergence Thesis , 105 NW. U. L. Rev. 149 (2011). [download pdf] Introduction Professor Derrick Bell was one of the most influential constitutional scholars of...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/8EcR9wrjtzY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/03/do-the-right-thing-understanding-the-interest-convergence-thesis.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>The Bin Laden Exception</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/2bLsucwWDtw/the-bin-laden-exception.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/02/the-bin-laden-exception.html</guid>


<category>Author: Luna, Erik</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Fourth Amendment</category>
<category>Topic: Privacy</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:54:52 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Erik Luna* Editor's Note: This Essay is part of a Colloquy Exchange between Professors Alexander Reinert and Erik Luna on the Fourth Amendment concerns of the new, invasive airport security measures. Read Professor Reinert's contribution, Revisiting "Special Needs" Theory Via...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/2bLsucwWDtw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/02/the-bin-laden-exception.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Revisiting "Special Needs" Theory Via Airport Searches</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/m-l_eVODrIY/revisiting-special-needs-theory-via-airport-searches.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/02/revisiting-special-needs-theory-via-airport-searches.html</guid>


<category>Author, Reinert, Alexander A.</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Fourth Amendment</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:32:34 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Alexander A. Reinert* Editor's Note: This Essay is part of a Colloquy Exchange between Professors Alexander Reinert and Erik Luna on the Fourth Amendment concerns of the new, invasive airport security measures. Read Professor Luna's contribution, The Bin Laden Exception,...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/m-l_eVODrIY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/02/revisiting-special-needs-theory-via-airport-searches.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Getting at Recess Appointments</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/vPAeQcGDyfA/getting-at-recess-appointments.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/01/getting-at-recess-appointments.html</guid>


<category>Author: Kalt, Brian C.</category>
<category>Author: Tillman, Seth Barrett</category>
<category>Topic: Appointment Clause</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Executive Power</category>
<category>Topic: Separation of Powers</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:04:44 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Just weeks ago, President Obama announced that he would use a recess appointment to make Richard Cordray the director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. Cordray had been nominated to the post months earlier, but Senate Republicans blocked his...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/vPAeQcGDyfA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2012/01/getting-at-recess-appointments.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Religion and Race: The Ministerial Exception Reexamined</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/HbU_tTreEVo/religion-and-race-the-ministerial-exception-reexamined.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/12/religion-and-race-the-ministerial-exception-reexamined.html</guid>


<category>Author: Bartrum, Ian</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: Establishment Clause</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 16:26:15 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Ian Bartrum* Editor's Note: This essay is the fifth in a five-part series on Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church &amp; School v. EEOC, a major religion case currently pending in the Supreme Court. For the first time, the Court may squarely...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/HbU_tTreEVo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/12/religion-and-race-the-ministerial-exception-reexamined.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Religious Freedom, Church–State Separation, and the Ministerial Exception</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~3/CLh39garOdg/religious-freedom-church-state-separation-and-the-ministerial-exception.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/12/religious-freedom-church-state-separation-and-the-ministerial-exception.html</guid>


<category>Author: Berg, Thomas C.</category>
<category>Author: Colby, Kimberlee Wood</category>
<category>Author: Esbeck, Carl H.</category>
<category>Author: Garnett, Richard W.</category>
<category>Topic: Constitutional Law</category>
<category>Topic: First Amendment</category>

<dc:creator>Northwestern University Law Review</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:18:38 -0600</pubDate>

<description>Thomas C. Berg*; Kimberlee Wood Colby**; Carl H. Esbeck***; Richard W. Garnett**** Editor's Note: This essay is the fourth in a five-part series on Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church &amp; School v. EEOC, a major religion case currently pending in the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ColloquyNorthwesternUniversityLawReview/~4/CLh39garOdg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://colloquy.law.northwestern.edu/main/2011/12/religious-freedom-church-state-separation-and-the-ministerial-exception.html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss><!-- ph=1 -->

