<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>blog</title>
    <link>http://chriserwin.com/blog/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>me@chriserwin.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-10-06T15:17:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>@font&#45;face, Real Fonts on the Web, For Real</title>
      <link>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/font-face_real_fonts_on_the_web_for_real/</link>
      <guid>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/font-face_real_fonts_on_the_web_for_real/#When:15:17:12Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While I haven&#8217;t had the opportunity to use the new/quite old @font-face rule on any real projects, I have done some quick tests, seen many great examples, and even reverse engineered <a href="http://typekit.com/" title="TypeKit">TypeKit</a> to see how they &#8220;securely&#8221; distribute licensed font libraries. @font-face gives me a lot of hope for the future of design and typography on the web. One day we&#8217;ll look back on the days when we were restricted to Times, Arial, Verdana, and Georgia as a nightmare that lasted far too long. The current batch of browsers do a decent job of supporting the @font-face rule, and they will only get better. Head over to <a href="http://www.useragentman.com/blog/2009/09/20/font-face-in-depth/" title="User Agent Man">Zoltan Hawryluk&#8217;s write-up</a> to see a side by comparison of how the fonts are rendered in the major browsers, as well as an in depth look at how to use the rule and a list of great resources.
</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject>CSS</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-10-06T15:17:12+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Deep Thoughts: Communicating Colour</title>
      <link>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/communicating_colour/</link>
      <guid>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/communicating_colour/#When:15:47:26Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago I was thinking about colour and how strange it would be to be colour blind, or never see colour at all. Then I started thinking about how you would communicate colour to someone who had never seen it, you can&#8217;t say &#8220;it looks like what an orange tastes like&#8221;, that would make no sense. After I was done abusing my brain with those thoughts, I took it one step further and started wondering if everyone sees colour the same way. Take a strawberry for example, I see it as red, but you might see it as what I would call purple, but you would still call it red, because that&#8217;s how you see it, neither of us would be wrong because that&#8217;s how our brains interpret that colour. But, how would you be able tell if someone else sees colour differently than you? We both say the strawberry is red, and we just assume we see the colour the same way.</p>

<p>
</p><div class="pic_container">
<div class="pic pic_left"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/red_strawberry.png" style="border: 0;" alt="what I see" width="283" height="265" /></div>
<div class="pic pic_right"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/purple_strawberry.png" style="border: 0;" alt="what you see" width="283" height="265" /></div>
<div class="caption">I see a red strawberry, and so do you, but what you call red I would call purple.</div>
</div>

<p>You might say that if I saw colours differently than you do then the colour harmonies in something like a painting would be out of whack. But, if that&#8217;s how you had always seen colour it would be totally normal. Take this Van Gogh painting as an example, I see it one way, you see it another way, both of us think it&#8217;s a beautiful piece of art because it depicts what we see in the real world. However, if either of us saw it the way the other person saw it, it would be a totally different painting with a completely different mood.</p>

<div class="pic_container">
<div class="pic pic_left"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/vangogh_normal.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="what I see" width="283" height="227" /></div>
<div class="pic pic_right"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/vangogh_altered.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="what you see" width="283" height="227" /></div>
<div class="caption">What I see and what you see are drastically different and have drastically different moods, but we would both see it and feel the same way about it because it&#8217;s normal to us.</div>
</div>

<p>Well it turns out I&#8217;m not the only crazy person thinking about this. I stumbled across <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_spectrum" target="_blank">Inverted Spectrum</a> on Wikipedia, which explains a similar idea where someone may see inverted colours. Kind of like seeing the world like a film negative (remember those?). It would be hard to detect because it&#8217;s normal to the person with the distorted vision. They say that it should be detectable because &#8220;there are more perceptually distinguishable shades between red and blue than there are between green and yellow, which would make red-green inversion behaviorally detectable.&#8221; I won&#8217;t pretend to fully understand what that means, but why would anyone get tested if they had no idea anything was &#8220;wrong&#8221;.</p>

<p>Now that I&#8217;ve messed with your head, I&#8217;ll leave you to ponder that and think about how you would determine if someone saw colours differently than you do.</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Deep Thoughts</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-08-08T15:47:26+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>jQuery vs. MooTools</title>
      <link>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/jquery_vs_mootools/</link>
      <guid>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/jquery_vs_mootools/#When:23:15:43Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As a front-end web developer most of the development I do is done in HTML, CSS and JavaScript. As the JavaScript widgets and applications that I build become increasingly more complex, the need for solid JavaScript framework becomes all that much more important. You certainly don&#8217;t need a JavaScript framework or library to build a rock solid application, however using one will make it much faster, painless, and enjoyable. For years I&#8217;ve been using the MooTools framework and before that the MooFX libraries to help build rich interactive JavaScript applications and interface widgets. I&#8217;ve used jQuery on occasion when I had to due to client requirements, but it&#8217;s always left me wanting more. While jQuery makes it dead easy to find and manipulate DOM elements and do some nice easy animations, it doesn&#8217;t do much beyond that. I&#8217;ve never really been able to articulate exactly why I prefer MooTools over jQuery, however Aaron Newton has done an excellent job with a very detailed and fair comparison of jQuery and Mootools at: <a href="http://jqueryvsmootools.com/" title="jQuery vs MooTools">jqueryvsmootools.com</a>. </p>

<p>I personally hope the MooTools community grows to a size comparable to jQuery&#8217;s. We need a helpful, friendly, and loyal community to spread the word about MooTools and help other developers, at any skill level, understand not only MooTools better, but JavaScript itself.
</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject>JavaScript, Geek</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-05-19T23:15:43+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Cutting the Cable</title>
      <link>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/cutting_the_cable/</link>
      <guid>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/cutting_the_cable/#When:18:54:09Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A couple months ago I started researching different ways that we could replace our current TV setup. We were subscribed to our cable company&rsquo;s top cable package with HD channels, PVR, and hundreds of channels we never watched. Essentially we were paying $80 a month to record TV shows that we would watch days or even weeks later,&nbsp; and watch old re-runs that we had seen dozens of times that we put on as background noise when there was &ldquo;nothing on&rdquo;. The PVR was a total disaster even when it did work properly, which it rarely did. If you set the PVR to record &ldquo;Lost&rdquo; on ABC&rsquo;s HD channel, the next week it would be listed as &ldquo;Lost HD&rdquo; or &ldquo;Lost HD (5.1)&rdquo; and wouldn&rsquo;t get recorded due to the variation in the listing name.&nbsp; I won&rsquo;t even get into the abysmal user interface that the team at work analyzed in great detail in the <a href="http://www.teehanlax.com/work/pvr-report/" target="_blank">Teehan+Lax PVR Report</a>.&nbsp; We were paying almost $1000 a year to watch old reruns of Friends and use an unreliable, out-of-date, and terribly clunky piece hardware/software to record our favourite TV shows. This was totally ridiculous.</p><div class="pic_container">
<div class="pic"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_rogers_letter.jpg" /></div>
<div class="caption">Even the cable company was telling me to change the way I watch TV.</div>
</div>

<p>At first I looked into stripping down our cable package to only what we watched, unfortunately this wasn&rsquo;t even close to being an option. I then looked into satellite TV providers who offered similar services for marginally less money, and the same standard options that didn&rsquo;t meet our needs. I briefly thought about buying a TIVO, but realized I would still be paying the same amount of money, if not more. I researched various HTPC setups and the different pieces of hardware needed to build a PVR from scratch. Each option seemed to have its own set of road blocks or shortfalls, from various DRM issues in the Windows Media Centre, to the unattractive interface of MythTV or Sage.</p>

<p>I then started looking into using a Mac as an <s>HTPC</s> HTMac, the hardware is attractive and whisper quiet, and the software available is pretty amazing.&nbsp; I chose to go with a Mac Mini over an AppleTV as it provided more possibilities.&nbsp; I ended up finding a Mac Mini on craigslist for $500, which is close to what I would have paid for the various pieces of hardware to build a custom HTPC. We now have a full fledged Mac computer hooked up to our TV, complete with everything you&rsquo;d find on a normal computer including Web Browser, Instant Messenger, and Games. </p>

<div class="pic_container">
<div class="pic"><img src="/resources/images/icons/magnify_corner.png" alt="zoom in" class="zoom" /><a href="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_tv_setup_full.jpg"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_tv_setup.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="caption">Our new TV setup with the Mac Mini looking right at home with it&#8217;s other gadget buddies.</div>
</div>

<h3>The Media Library Interface</h3>

<p>I started by installing <a href="http://www.plexapp.com/" target="_blank">Plex</a> which is a variation of Xbox Media Center (XBMC). Plex provides a gorgeous front-end interface to your media library. Your music, pictures, movies, TV shows, and even online video are all accessible through its very customizable interface. Plex will pull down cover art, screenshots, all kinds of meta data, and even theme songs for all the movies and TV shows in your media library. Each time you start Plex it scans for new content and automatically downloads all the available meta data. This makes for a pretty impressive looking media library. Plex even has a media server which allows you to watch online content from sites like CNN, CollegeHumour, Vimeo, YouTube, Joost, Hulu, and many others. There are similar pieces of software like <a href="http://www.boxee.tv/" target="_blank">Boxee</a>, and the original <a href="http://xbmc.org/" target="_blank">XBMC</a>, but I&rsquo;ve found Plex to be the perfect fit for us so far.</p>

<div class="pic_container">
<div class="pic pic_left"><img src="/resources/images/icons/magnify_corner.png" alt="zoom in" class="zoom" /><a href="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_plex_1_full.jpg"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_plex_1.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="pic pic_right"><img src="/resources/images/icons/magnify_corner.png" alt="zoom in" class="zoom" /><a href="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_plex_2_full.jpg"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_plex_2.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="caption">Plex provides a really tight front-end to your media library.</div>
</div>

<h3>Full Episodes, Online, For Free</h3>

<p>Outside of your own media library there is an abundance of online content available for free, and many of them are totally legal and backed by major television and cable networks.&nbsp; Most people have heard of <a href="http://www.hulu.com/" target="_blank">Hulu</a>, a website where you can watch full episodes from a library of hundreds of popular TV Shows from networks like NBC and FOX. Most shows will be available on Hulu the day after it airs on TV. Most shows are also available in 480p which isn&rsquo;t HD, but still looks really good full screen, and definitely looks better than analog channels on cable. Hulu even has a few shows <a href="http://www.hulu.com/hd" target="_blank">available in full HD</a>, which is hopefully a sign of things to come. <a href="http://www.fancast.com/" target="_blank">Fancast</a> is another website that provides the same type of service from an even bigger library of TV shows from networks like ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX and bunch of others.&nbsp; Chances are if you have a favorite show on one of the major television networks you&rsquo;ll be able to find it on one of these sites.&nbsp; Most of the major television networks also have full episodes available on their websites totally free and totally legal. </p>

<div class="pic_container">
<div class="pic pic_left"><img src="/resources/images/icons/magnify_corner.png" alt="zoom in" class="zoom" /><a href="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_hulu_full.jpg"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_hulu.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="pic pic_right"><img src="/resources/images/icons/magnify_corner.png" alt="zoom in" class="zoom" /><a href="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_fancast_full.jpg"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_fancast.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="caption">Hulu and Fancast both have Hundreds of TV shows with full episodes available for free.</div>
</div>

<p>The major problem with these services is that they&rsquo;re only available in the US, and the rest of the world gets the shaft. Fortunately there are ways around this, while not exactly legal, it&rsquo;s not really illegal either, just a sneaky loophole. Your first option is a service called <a href="http://hotspotshield.com/" target="_blank">Hot Spot Shield</a> which is a piece of software you run on your computer to mask your IP address through proxy servers.&nbsp; <a href="http://hotspotshield.com/" target="_blank">Hot Spot Shield</a> is totally free but it does add banner ads to every site you visit, and it can be excruciatingly slow as this has become a popular way around the &ldquo;only available in US&rdquo; content.</p>

<p>Another option which I&rsquo;ve started using is called <a href="http://snurl.com/strongvpn" target="_blank">StrongVPN</a>, which gives you a US IP Address through the use of their VPN Servers. Speeds are really fast through <a href="http://snurl.com/strongvpn" target="_blank">StrongVPN</a>, I only see a slight drop in download speed when connected. You don&rsquo;t need to install any software, just configure a VPN connection and all of your internet traffic will go through the VPN&rsquo;s US IP Address. While it&rsquo;s not free, at $15 a month it&rsquo;s certainly cheaper than cable, I would highly recommend <a href="http://snurl.com/strongvpn" target="_blank">StrongVPN</a> if you plan to watch online content from any US only website.</p>

<div class="pic_container">
<div class="pic pic_left"><img src="/resources/images/icons/magnify_corner.png" alt="zoom in" class="zoom" /><a href="http://www.speedtest.net/result/460088991.png"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_speed_1.png" /></a></div>
<div class="pic pic_left" style="margin-left: 2px;"><img src="/resources/images/icons/magnify_corner.png" alt="zoom in" class="zoom" /><a href="http://www.speedtest.net/result/460090329.png"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_speed_2.png" /></a></div>
<div class="pic pic_right"><img src="/resources/images/icons/magnify_corner.png" alt="zoom in" class="zoom" /><a href="http://www.speedtest.net/result/460091917.png"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_speed_3.png" /></a></div>
<div class="caption">Connection speed comparison between my plain 10mbps internet connection, StrongVPN, and Hot Spot Shield. Notice how StrongVPN is only slightly slower than my regular internet connection, while Hot Spot Shield is significantly slower.</div>
</div>

<h3>Downloading your Content</h3>

<p>If you&rsquo;re not into the whole sneaking around &ldquo;only available in US&rdquo; content, there is a less than legal alternative, downloading your TV Shows. Now I&rsquo;m not endorsing pirated video, or stealing other peoples content, but for many this is the only solution that will work. </p>

<p>Most people are familiar with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent_(protocol)" target="_blank">Bit Torrent</a>, a file sharing protocol where ideally you upload as much as you download. Essentially you download a file from a bunch of people, and you share what you&rsquo;ve downloaded with a bunch of other people. Without giving as much as you receive Bit Torrent simply wouldn&rsquo;t work, you need people &ldquo;seeding&rdquo; or sharing content in order for others to be able to download. </p>

<p>There are a couple great applications for the Mac that will automatically download your favourite TV shows, saving you the hassle of searching Bit Torrent sites every day for new episodes. <a href="http://tvshows.sourceforge.net/index2.html" target="_blank">TVShows</a> and <a href="http://www.ted.nu/" target="_blank">TED</a> are very similar applications that allow you to setup your favourite TV shows and they will starting downloading new episodes as soon as they&rsquo;re available. I preferred TED which seems a little more complete than TVShows which hasn&rsquo;t been updated in a while.</p>

<p>Someone on the Plex Forums even created a little application called <a href="http://forums.plexapp.com/index.php?showtopic=2822" target="_blank">Episode Linker</a> that will rename and move your downloaded TV shows to the proper TV show and season folder.&nbsp; This will allow Plex to properly scrape your TV shows and download the cover art and meta data. Without this application you&rsquo;re left manually moving your downloaded files every day which can get a little annoying.</p>

<p>While the semi-automated Bit Torrent setup worked for the most part, it wasn&rsquo;t really seamless and still required a fair amount of attention. Some torrents wouldn&rsquo;t download due to restrictions with the tracker which leaves you searching for alternate torrents. Download speeds weren&rsquo;t ideal as my ISP shapes my internet traffic, and Bit Torrent seems like a primary target. I was also using double the amount of network traffic that I needed as I was uploading as much as I downloaded. So one 350mb TV show actually cost me 700mb of traffic, when you have a 60gb download cap you need to keep an eye on these things. </p>

<h3>The Better Way to Download</h3>

<p>That&rsquo;s when I discovered <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USENET" target="_blank">Usenet</a>, a network which actually pre-dates the World Wide Web. Originally used for posting messages to newsgroups, many people have started uploading files to various newsgroups which can then be downloaded by anyone with access to that newsgroup. Everything from books and movies to software and games can be found on different newsgroups. I really don&rsquo;t know much about Usenet, and I definitely don&rsquo;t know all the lingo, but I do know that it beats the hell out of downloading with Bit Torrent. <a href="http://how-to-usenet.com/ target="_blank">How to Usenet</a> should help get you started if you&rsquo;re interesting in using Usenet</p>

<p>You&rsquo;ll need access to Usenet if you&rsquo;re <a href="http://docs.newzbin.com/index.php/Usenet:ISP_Providers">ISP doesn&rsquo;t already provide it</a>, I went with <a href="http://www.news.astraweb.com/" target="_blank">Astraweb</a> which has great prices and a pretty good reputation despite their terrible website.&nbsp; Next you&rsquo;ll need a site where you can search for NZB files which are similar to Torrent files. <a href="http://www.tvnzb.com/">TVNZB</a> is a great site that hosts NZB&rsquo;s for hundreds of TV Shows, and many shows are up within 15-20 minutes of being aired. The final piece of the Usenet puzzle is the software you&rsquo;ll use to download the files. Again I don&rsquo;t know much about Usenet, but from the sounds of it files are usually downloaded in groups or RAR files which need to be analyzed, repaired and unpacked once you have them downloaded.&nbsp; Luckily there is a program that will do all of this for you, and more.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.sabnzbd.org/" target="_blank">SABnzbd+</a> is a program with a terrible name that will make downloading files from Usenet a completely seamless process.&nbsp; SABnzbd+ is a server-oriented program that you access through a web interface, and once properly setup you can access from anywhere in the world. While not the sexiest program or the easiest to setup, once it&rsquo;s running it makes downloading files from Usenet a totally painless experience. You can setup SABnzbd+ so it will automatically <a href="http://sabnzbd.wikidot.com/folder-sorting" target="_blank">move downloaded files to the proper directory</a>. For TV shows it will even rename the file with the proper &ldquo;S01E01&rdquo; format and move the file to the proper TV show and season folder, which Plex requires. SABnzbd+ can also read RSS feeds so it will download new files as soon as they appear in the feed. <a href="http://tvnzbrss.com/" target="_blank">MyTvNZBrss</a> will generate an RSS feed of your favorite shows which can then be plugged into SABnzbd+ so it can automatically download your TV shows as they become available. You can then go back and modify your RSS feed at any time and you won&rsquo;t have to change any settings in SABnzbd+. When a download is done you can even have SABnzbd+ make a call to the Plex web interface to tell Plex to scan for new content and add the new download to the Plex library.</p>

<p>Once this was setup and tuned properly downloading content became a totally hands off experience and I rarely have to leave the Plex interface now. In fact there is even a <a href="http://forums.plexapp.com/index.php?showtopic=1352" target="_blank">SABnzbd+ plugin for Plex</a> so you can see your queue and even queue files from TVNZB within the Plex interface. Oh did I mention I&rsquo;m able to download files at 1100kB/s from Usenet, which means a 30 minute TV show downloads in under 5 minutes. In many cases TV shows will be ready to watch in Plex 20-30 minutes after they air on TV. </p>

<div class="pic_container">
<div class="pic"><img src="/resources/images/icons/magnify_corner.png" alt="zoom in" class="zoom" /><a href="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_sabnzbd_full.png"><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/cut_cable_sabnzbd.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="caption">Screenshot of the SABnzbd+ queue using the Plush skin</div>
</div>

<h3>Things to Consider</h3>

<p>I&rsquo;m much happier with our new setup, and I&rsquo;m very happy to <b>not</b> give our cable company $80 a month for an out-of-date, unreliable service. While this type of setup works great for us, there are some things to consider before you cut the cable.</p>

<ul>
&nbsp;   <li>Do you watch a lot of sports, if so you may find yourself at the local bar more often now as you won&#8217;t be able to watch live broadcasts</li>

&nbsp;   <li>Do you watch the evening news. To my knowledge downloading complete news broadcasts isn&rsquo;t very common.&nbsp; Although, you can find top stories on CNN or other major news websites.</li>

&nbsp;   <li>Can your internet connection handle the amount of content you&rsquo;ll be pushing through it. You&rsquo;ll  want decent download speeds (probably nothing less than 5mbps) if you&rsquo;re going to be streaming content from sites like Hulu, and you&rsquo;ll need a pretty high download cap</li>

&nbsp;   <li>Is everyone that will be using the TV tech savvy enough to understand the basics of your new setup.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s not as easy as picking up the remote and flipping through channels. Although it will pretty straight forward.</li>

&nbsp;   <li>Are you willing to deal with the occasional momentary chuggy or stuttery streaming video. With a decent connection it doesn&rsquo;t happen often, but it&rsquo;s bound to happen. </li>

&nbsp;   <li>Do you have enough storage space for all the video content you will be downloading, use of a large external drive or NAS is probably a good idea.</li>

&nbsp;   <li>If you wear a tin foil hat and you&rsquo;re afraid of missing the doomsday notice on the <a href="http://www.secretweaponlabs.com/words/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/this-is-only-a-test.gif">Emergency Broadcast System</a> this probably isn&rsquo;t going to work for you.</li>

&nbsp;   <li>If you&rsquo;re looking for an out the box solution you&rsquo;ll be disappointed, you&rsquo;ll need patience and the willingness to tweak your setup.</li>

&nbsp;   <li>Mac OSX isn&rsquo;t really designed to be used from 10 feet away, you&rsquo;ll need some pretty keen eyes. I find myself zooming in to read text quite often using the Control + Mouse Scroll Wheel zoom feature in OSX. However Plex is designed to be used from 10 feet away, and is easy to read and use.</li>
</ul>

<h3>Final Thoughts</h3>

<p>On demand entertainment is the way of the future and it will eventually replace broadcast entertainment. You can download TV shows and rent movies from iTunes, and sites like Hulu and Fancast have tons of on demand content. The one thing we&rsquo;re missing is a seamless experience that ties it all together. Products like <a href="http://www.apple.com/appletv/" target="_blank">AppleTV</a> and <a href="http://www.vudu.com/">Vudu</a> are pretty close, but not quite there. I want a sexy piece of hardware, and a tight clean interface like Plex for a reasonable monthly price.&nbsp; If a product / service combo like that existed I would totally be on board, until then I&rsquo;ll continue to tweak and use my current TV setup.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Gadgets, Geek</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-04-25T18:54:09+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Losing the Landline</title>
      <link>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/losing_the_landline/</link>
      <guid>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/losing_the_landline/#When:14:09:19Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A couple months ago I was looking at our phone bill and realized that we were paying 3 phones bills for 2 people that hardly ever use the phone. Something about this wasn&#8217;t adding up right. We tried to think of a valid reason why we needed to keep the $30 a month landline when we both have cell phones. We couldn&#8217;t come up with any, except for the fact that sometimes we just don&#8217;t hear our cell phones at home. Sometimes I&#8217;ll be upstairs and my cell phone will be on vibrate downstairs, or we&#8217;ll be watching TV and we forgot our cell phone in our jacket pocket downstairs. This reason alone kept us tied to our landline. The only solution we could think of would be some sort of bluetooth ringer that would ring with our cell phones, this idea lead us to find the XLink Bluetooth Gateway.
</p><p><img src="http://chriserwin.com/images/uploads/xlink.png" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="152" height="204" class="image_right" />The XLink is a tiny device that allows you to plug your home phone system into it and then pair up to 3 bluetooth cell phones with it. Now any time you get a call on one of the paired cell phones, the home phone system will ring just like you&#8217;re getting a call on your landline. You pick up your home phone and talk like you normally would. If you want to make a phone call just pick up your home phone, select which cell phone you want to use (1, 2, or 3) press the flash button and dial as you normally would. If your home phone system supports distinct rings, the kind where you hear a different ring for long distance calls, the XLink will even have a distinct ring for each of the cell phones paired with it so you know who&#8217;s cell phone is ringing. There is also a version of the XLink which will work with your existing landline so you can have your landline and your cell phones ring your home phone system.</p>

<h3>Things to Consider</h3><p>
While this solution is working great for us so far, there are some things you may want to consider before going down this road.</p>

<ul>
<li>If you have kids without a cell phone this may not be a best solution, especially if those kids are ever home alone.</li>
<li>Do you have more than three people with a cell phone that want in on this solution.</li>
<li>911 calls are handled differently as the 911 operator will not be able to determine your location from a cell phone</li>
<li>For best performance your cell phone should be within 10 feet of the XLink, or else the voice quality will be non-existant, however the phones will still ring.</li>
<li>With bluetooth turned on your cell phone will check threw battery life much faster, at least that&#8217;s the case with my iPhone.</li>
<li>You&#8217;ll probably want a multi-handset cordless phone system, because you can only plug one phone into the XLink</li>
</ul>

<p>After taking everything into consideration we couldn&#8217;t justified paying $30 a month for the telephone landline that we hardly ever used.&nbsp; The only tricky part so far has been training ourselves to leave our cell phones near the XLink, which will eventually become habit.</p>

<p>Check out the XLink website to learn more: <a href="http://www.myxlink.com">www.myxlink.com</a>
</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Gadgets</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-04-10T14:09:19+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Hello World</title>
      <link>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/hello_world/</link>
      <guid>http://chriserwin.com/blog/post/hello_world/#When:13:59:45Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After two years I finally have a website again. I can&#8217;t believe the last time I updated my website was January 2007. A lot has happened in two years, I&#8217;ll try to summarize quickly</p>

<p> We stopped the day to day operations of Thirdcircle, I got a job at Organic, 8 months later I got a new job at teehan+lax, I&#8217;ve moved, I&#8217;ve bought a new car, I&#8217;ve gotten engaged. In terms of projects: CampusCentral.com has been neglected and leads a lonely life, VioletValley.com has closed and is no longer taking orders, Soapbox has been abandoned for a number of reasons, and Cirqa Host is shutting down soon. While the news about all my past projects may seem bleak, I assure you there are new projects on the horizon to look forward to.</p>

<p>
</p><p>So what&#8217;s the new website all about? Well it&#8217;s been redesigned and rebuilt from the ground up. The site is no longer running on Soapbox, instead I&#8217;ve opted to go with the extremely powerful and extremely flexible Expression Engine. This is the first time I&#8217;ve built my website without also building the backend for it. I&#8217;ve learned my lesson, just because you can build the backend to your blog, doesn&#8217;t mean that you should. Hopefully with a proper blog engine powering the website I&#8217;ll be able to maintain it properly and update it regularly.</p>

<p>What can you expect to see here? I&#8217;ll be writing about web development, design, photography, gadgets and geekery, my projects, and random things I come across on my daily dive into the internet. I&#8217;ll also be writing about some pretty major events that are going to unfold in the next year of my life. I&#8217;ll be getting married next June, and we&#8217;ll hopefully be buying a house shortly after, both of which will make for an exciting, not to mention very expensive year ahead.</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Life, Miscellaneous</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-03-29T13:59:45+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>