<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Canadian Business Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog</link>
	<description>Dedicated to bringing you news and information about the current Canadian business environment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:03:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CanadianBusinessBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="canadianbusinessblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Extension of Accelerated Capital Cost Allowance (ACCA) Provides Tax Relief for Manufacturers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianBusinessBlog/~3/ILv8QjYTkX4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/05/13/extension-of-accelerated-capital-cost-allowance-acca-provides-tax-relief-for-manufacturers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax incentive program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=2364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent federal budget of 2013 highlighted several initiatives aimed at strengthening the competitiveness of the manufacturing sector. New sources of Canadian business funding and renewal of previous initiatives provides extra incentives for manufacturers to advance their business to the next level. One initiative that is especially beneficial for manufacturers is the renewal of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent <a  href="http://www.budget.gc.ca/2013/doc/plan/toc-tdm-eng.html">federal budget of 2013</a> highlighted several initiatives aimed at strengthening the competitiveness of the manufacturing sector. New sources of <a  href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/canadian-business-funding.php">Canadian business funding</a> and renewal of previous initiatives provides extra incentives for manufacturers to advance their business to the next level. One initiative that is especially beneficial for manufacturers is the renewal of the accelerated capital cost allowance (ACCA) for new investment in machinery and equipment. The initiative was renewed for additional 2 years and will run until 2017-2018, providing an estimated total of $1.4 billion in tax relief for Canada’s manufacturing and processing sector.</p>
<p>ACCA allows companies that purchase new machinery or equipment to depreciate the asset at 50% using the straight line method. In the absence of ACCA, the machinery would be depreciated at 30% declining-balance rate, which will result in lower annual deductions from income over a much longer period of time. Let’s take the example that a manufacturer purchases new machinery for $10,000 that has zero salvage value.  See the below table which compares the two depreciation methods:</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68"></td>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" width="319">
<p align="center">Straight Line Depreciation @ 50%</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" width="331">
<p align="center">Declining Balance  Depreciation @ 30%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">
<p align="center">Year</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">Depreciation</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="83">
<p align="center">Book</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">Accumulated Depreciation</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">Depreciation</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="95">
<p align="center">Book</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">Accumulated Depreciation</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">
<p align="center">0</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="83">
<p align="center">$10,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="95">
<p align="center">$10,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">
<p align="center">1</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$5,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="83">
<p align="center">$5,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$5,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$3,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="95">
<p align="center">$7,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$3,000</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">
<p align="center">2</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$5,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="83">
<p align="center">$0</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$10,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$2,100</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="95">
<p align="center">$4,900</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$5,100</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">
<p align="center">3</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="83"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$1,470</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="95">
<p align="center">$3,430</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$6,570</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">
<p align="center">4</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="83"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$1,029</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="95">
<p align="center">$2,401</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$7,599</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">
<p align="center">5</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="83"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$720.30</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="95">
<p align="center">$1,680.70</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$8,319.30</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68">
<p align="center">6</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="83"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$504.21</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="95">
<p align="center">$1,176.49</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">$8,823.51</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="68"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="83"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118"></td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">…</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="95">
<p align="center">…</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="118">
<p align="center">…</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As illustrated, straight line depreciation allows for a faster write-off of machinery and equipment. The declining balance depreciation results in lower annual deductions from income over a longer period of time.  In the above example, it would take nine taxation years to deduct 95% of the value of the machine. By allowing for a faster depreciation through the straight line method, ACCA provides support to the manufacturing sector to help them be competitive with the global economy.</p>
 <img src="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=2364" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianBusinessBlog/~4/ILv8QjYTkX4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/05/13/extension-of-accelerated-capital-cost-allowance-acca-provides-tax-relief-for-manufacturers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/05/13/extension-of-accelerated-capital-cost-allowance-acca-provides-tax-relief-for-manufacturers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada Posts First Trade Surplus in a Year</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianBusinessBlog/~3/WfkGFq2iLT8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/05/10/canada-posts-first-trade-surplus-in-a-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 15:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OEF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=2353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rising US demand has generated an increase in Canadian exports, allowing for the first trade surplus in a year.  Statistics Canada reported a 5.1 % increase in exports in March 2013 to $40.5 billion, with only a 1.7% increase in imports to $40.4 billion.  Exports to the United States were responsible for three-quarters of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rising US demand has generated an increase in Canadian exports, allowing for the first trade surplus in a year.  <a  href="http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/exports-imports-both-rose-in-march-producing-trade-surplus-statscan-205766371.html">Statistics Canada</a> reported a 5.1 % increase in exports in March 2013 to $40.5 billion, with only a 1.7% increase in imports to $40.4 billion.  Exports to the United States were responsible for three-quarters of the story, rising four per cent to $29.5 billion.</p>
<p>&#8220;The trade picture in the first quarter of 2013 certainly paints the story of an economy moving away from domestic demand driven growth, to one where the economic engines are being fuelled by trade,&#8221; said TD Bank economist Diana Petramala.</p>
<p>With increasing demand in the US, it vital for Canadian manufacturers to take advantage of export opportunities south of the border. The Government of Canada has facilitated this through <a  href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/canadian-business-funding.php">Canadian business funding</a> such as the Ontario Exporters Fund (OEF) and Export Market Access (<a  href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/ema.php">EMA</a>).</p>
<ul>
<li>OEF allows companies to become export-ready through the hiring of an export manager. The grant provides funding up to $40,000 a year for two years, covering a maximum of 50% of the salary.</li>
<li>EMA is designed to provide companies easier access to foreign markets. Manufacturers can receive 50% of eligible costs up to $100000. Eligible categories include direct contacts, tradeshow expenditures and market research. If your company has plans for expansion, the government has programs in place to encourage you to increase your sales outside of Canada.</li>
</ul>
 <img src="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=2353" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianBusinessBlog/~4/WfkGFq2iLT8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/05/10/canada-posts-first-trade-surplus-in-a-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/05/10/canada-posts-first-trade-surplus-in-a-year/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Repeal of Industrial Exception Means Professional Engineers Required for Production Equipment Modifications</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianBusinessBlog/~3/uqbj7jhkB9Q/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/05/03/repeal-of-industrial-exception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 22:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>melanie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=2341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent press release by the Professional Engineers Ontario (PEO) indicated that the Government of Ontario has approved a change to the Professional Engineers Act that will remove the so-called industrial exception starting on March 1, 2013. This means that professional engineering work on equipment or machinery used to produce end products must now be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent press release by the Professional Engineers Ontario (PEO) indicated that the Government of Ontario has approved a change to the Professional Engineers Act that will remove the so-called industrial exception starting on March 1, 2013. This means that professional engineering work on equipment or machinery used to produce end products must now be performed by an individual that is licensed by Professional Engineers Ontario (PEO). The Professional Engineers Act has defined professional engineering work as work that meets the following three criteria:</p>
<p>1. Requires the application of engineering principles.<br />
2. Concerns the safeguarding of economic interests, public welfare, the environment.<br />
3. Any act of planning, designing, composing, measuring, evaluating, inspecting, advising, reporting, directing or supervising, or managing any of the activities that comply with (1) and (2).</p>
<p>The change follows the repeal of Section 12(3)(a) of the Act.  Prior to the repeal, 12(3)(a) allowed non-licensed individuals to conduct engineering work when it related to production machinery or production processes in manufacturing — as long as the individual was the manufacturer&#8217;s employee.  After the repeal, if you are upgrading or modifying an existing piece of production equipment, and the work qualifies as professional engineering work, then you will require the services of a professional engineer.</p>
<p>The government has made these steps because they want to increase public and workers safety, as well as help decrease businesses costs. They are hoping that with this change will decrease workplace injury/illnesses and minimize downtime and replacement of machinery. It is expected that this change will effect over 1000 companies in Ontario.</p>
<p>PEO is the licensing regulating body for engineering in the province of Ontario with over 80,000 license holders.  NorthBridge Consultants is authorized by PEO to offer professional engineering services in Ontario.</p>
 <img src="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=2341" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianBusinessBlog/~4/uqbj7jhkB9Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/05/03/repeal-of-industrial-exception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/05/03/repeal-of-industrial-exception/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>New Canada Jobs Grant Introduced Under Labour Market Agreements</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianBusinessBlog/~3/gwh4yhwRZhY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/04/26/new-canada-jobs-grant-introduced-under-labour-market-agreements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrei</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=2323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of the 2013 federal budget, the government has announced plans to introduce a new federal training initiative called the Canada Jobs Grant. Back in 2007, Canada unveiled its $3 billion Labour Market Agreements (with the provinces and territories) which offered assistance over three years to  low-skilled Canadians or those who were not eligible for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/images/foundation.jpg" alt="Construction Workers" /></p>
<p>As part of the 2013 federal budget, the government has announced plans to introduce a new federal training initiative called the Canada Jobs Grant.</p>
<p>Back in 2007, Canada unveiled its $3 billion Labour Market Agreements (with the provinces and territories) which offered assistance over three years to  low-skilled Canadians or those who were not eligible for Employment Insurance (EI) benefits. The agreements will expire on March 2014, but the Government intends on renewing the Labour Market Agreements and reforming them to closely connect skills training and employers with the Canada Job Grant. Economic Action Plan 2013 announced the Government’s intention to renew the Labour Market Agreements  in 2014 with investments of $500 million per year. The Canada Job  Grant will consist of $300 million of the total annual Labour Market Agreement funding from the federal government, upon full implementation in 2017–18. As for the remaining $200 million per year, it will continue to be transferred to provinces and territories to assist in delivery of critical employment services like counselling and job search assistance, and administration.</p>
<p>One thing that makes the Canada Job Grant unique is the fact that provinces and employers will be required to match the government’s contribution of up to $5,000 per person towards training at eligible training institutions.  The budget estimates that roughly 130,000 Canadians will be able to benefit from this grant. That being said, there are also numerous other <a  href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/workforce-development.php">workforce development</a> grants available which offer businesses added incentive to hire interns and students.</p>
 <img src="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=2323" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianBusinessBlog/~4/gwh4yhwRZhY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/04/26/new-canada-jobs-grant-introduced-under-labour-market-agreements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/04/26/new-canada-jobs-grant-introduced-under-labour-market-agreements/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada’s Performance in Innovation</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CanadianBusinessBlog/~3/5eaMbj9NoVg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/04/15/canadas-performance-in-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research and development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AgriInnovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sred]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/?p=2311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ottawa based think tank, The Conference Board, released a series of reports called &#8220;How Canada Performs: A Report Card on Canada,&#8221; which assesses Canada’s quality of life in comparison to other countries. Canada receives grades of &#8220;B&#8221; in the majority of the sections, and received a grade of &#8220;A&#8221; in the Education and Skills section. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ottawa based think tank, The Conference Board, released a series of reports called &#8220;<a  href="http://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/default.aspx" target="_blank">How Canada Performs: A Report Card on Canada</a>,&#8221; which assesses Canada’s quality of life in comparison to other countries. Canada receives grades of &#8220;B&#8221; in the majority of the sections, and received a grade of &#8220;A&#8221; in the Education and Skills section. However Canada’s performance in Innovation is poor, with the think tank assigning the country a grade of “D.” According to the report, Canada ranks second last in the amount businesses spend on R&amp;D and in venture capital expenditures. However the country does well in terms of the quality of scientific research and the creation of new businesses.</p>
<p>The Canadian government provides a variety of funding to provide financial support for companies to undertake innovation projects. The <a  href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/what-is-sred.php" target="_blank">Scientific Research and Experimental Development</a> (SR&amp;ED) tax credit is the most popular funding source for R&amp;D projects, but there also exist various grants and loan programs such as <a  href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/other-funding-irap.php" target="_blank">IRAP</a>, <a  href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/agriinnovation.php" target="_blank">AgriInnovation Program</a>, Innovation Demonstration Fund, and the Southern Ontario Fund for Investment in Innovation (SOFII), to name a few. The Canadian government ranks 8<sup>th</sup> in terms of R&amp;D spending for business; yet, Canadian business spending on R&amp;D has dropped to 0.89% of GDP in 2011, from 1.29% of GDP in 2001. US businesses spend twice as much on R&amp;D, and Finnish businesses three times as much on R&amp;D compared to Canadian businesses. The onus is on Canadian businesses to ensure that they receive full value from generous  <a  href="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/" target="_blank">government funding initiatives</a>.</p>
 <img src="http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=2311" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CanadianBusinessBlog/~4/5eaMbj9NoVg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/04/15/canadas-performance-in-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2013/04/15/canadas-performance-in-innovation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
