<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title> CAclubindia.com : judiciary</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/</link>
<generator>https://www.caclubindia.com/</generator>
<item>
<title>Mandatory Personal Hearing under Section 75(4) Cannot Be Waived if taxpayer wrongly selected  'No' for personal hearing in SCN Reply</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/mandatory-personal-hearing-under-section-75-4-cannot-be-waived-if-taxpayer-wrongly-selected-no-for-personal-hearing-in-scn-reply-6006.asp</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2026 10:44:38 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Komal Jayeshbhai Hemavat v. State Tax Officer (4) & Anr. [R/Special Civil Application No. 6209 of 2024, order dated April 02, 2026] held that the statutory mandate of Section 75(4) of the CGST Act requiring grant of personal hearing cannot be dispensed w]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Demand of tax after voluntary ITC reversal, amounts to double taxation; no interest where sufficient balance exists in E-Credit Ledger</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/demand-of-tax-after-voluntary-itc-reversal-amounts-to-double-taxation-no-interest-where-sufficient-balance-exists-in-e-credit-ledger-6005.asp</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2026 10:44:38 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of Manoja Kumar Nayak &Anr. v. Commissioner, GST & Central Excise & Ors. [W.P.(C) No. 12682 of 2025 & W.P.(C) No. 12686 of 2025, order dated April 08, 2026] held that raising demand of tax equivalent to input tax credit already voluntarily reversed prior to]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>GST Registration in One State Can Be Denied Due to Non-Compliance in Another State</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/gst-registration-in-one-state-can-be-denied-due-to-non-compliance-in-another-state-6004.asp</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2026 10:44:38 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Leighton India Contractors Private Limited vs Union of India & Ors [Civil Writ Petition No. 4042/2026, order dated March 05, 2026] held that a company registered in one State which fails to comply with GST provisions, including filing of returns, would]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Supreme Court's COVID Limitation Exclusion Applies to GST Appeals and Cannot Be Rejected as Time-Barred</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/supreme-court-s-covid-limitation-exclusion-applies-to-gst-appeals-and-cannot-be-rejected-as-time-barred-6003.asp</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2026 10:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Marvin Enterprise v. State of Gujarat & Ors. [R/Special Civil Application No. 4869 of 2026, order dated April 09, 2026] held that the benefit of limitation exclusion granted by the Supreme Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020 Order dated Jan]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 11683 of 2026 dated May 29, 2026</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/special-leave-petition-civil-diary-no-11683-of-2026-dated-may-29-2026-6002.asp</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2026 10:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. v. M/s Bambino Agro Industries Ltd. & Anr. [Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 11683 of 2026 dated May 29, 2026] stayed the operation of the impugned judgment of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court which had held that mere uploading of sh]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>SC Stays Allahabad HC Ruling Holding That Mere Uploading of GST Notices and Orders on Common Portal Does Not Constitute Valid Communication Under Section 169 of the GST Act</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/sc-stays-allahabad-hc-ruling-holding-that-mere-uploading-of-gst-notices-and-orders-on-common-portal-does-not-constitute-valid-communication-under-section-169-of-the-gst-act-6001.asp</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2026 10:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. v. M/s Bambino Agro Industries Ltd. & Anr. [Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 11683 of 2026 dated May 29, 2026] stayed the operation of the impugned judgment of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court which had held that mere uploading of sh]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Exoneration in Section 73 proceedings by State GST authorities would not ipso facto bar Central GST authorities from initiating proceedings under Section 74</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/exoneration-in-section-73-proceedings-by-state-gst-authorities-would-not-ipso-facto-bar-central-gst-authorities-from-initiating-proceedings-under-section-74-6000.asp</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2026 10:22:21 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in PEI Industries v. Union of India & Ors. [W.P.(C) 7725/2026 & CM APPL. 37364/2026 dated May 29, 2026] dismissed the writ petition challenging the Order-in-Original dated March 30, 2026 passed under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ( "the CGST]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>SC issues Notice on Sealing of Business Premises u/s 67(4) and Bank Account Attachment u/s 83 under GST and Calls for De-sealing Instructions</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/sc-issues-notice-on-sealing-of-business-premises-u-s-67-4-and-bank-account-attachment-u-s-83-under-gst-and-calls-for-de-sealing-instructions-5999.asp</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2026 10:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in M/s Murliwala Pigment v. Union of India & Ors. [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 17943 of 2026 dated May 21, 2026] issued notice on the Special Leave Petition ( "the SLP" ) filed against the order of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court which had dismissed the writ pe]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Quashed Rectification Order issued without considering overlapping proceedings and opportunity of being heard  under Section 161 of the CGST Act</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/quashed-rectification-order-issued-without-considering-overlapping-proceedings-and-opportunity-of-being-heard-under-section-161-of-the-cgst-act-5998.asp</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2026 10:57:26 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Taiyo Nippon Sanso India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition No. 1966 of 2025 dated April 22, 2026] quashed the rectification order passed under Section 161 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") on the ground that]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>GSTAT has inherent power to grant interim relief; writ not maintainable where effective appellate remedy exists</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/gstat-has-inherent-power-to-grant-interim-relief-writ-not-maintainable-where-effective-appellate-remedy-exists-5997.asp</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2026 10:51:32 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [Writ Petition (L) No. 4698 OF 2026, order dated February 20, 2026] held that the GST Appellate Tribunal possesses inherent and incidental powers to grant interim relief, inc]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
