<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title> CAclubindia.com : judiciary</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/</link>
<generator>https://www.caclubindia.com/</generator>
<item>
<title>No liability of TCS in GST on e-commerce operator not collecting consideration</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/no-liability-of-tcs-in-gst-on-e-commerce-operator-not-collecting-consideration-5981.asp</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 10:42:20 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Hiveloop Technology Private Limited vs Additional Director, Directorate General of GST Intelligence [Writ Petition No. 21130 of 2022 (T-RES), order dated March 09, 2026] held that an e-commerce operator who does not collect consideration for supplies m]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blocking of e-credit account under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules cannot continue beyond one year</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/blocking-of-e-credit-account-under-rule-86a-of-the-cgst-rules-cannot-continue-beyond-one-year-5980.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2026 11:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of NZS Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition No. 4815 OF 2024, order dated March 25, 2026] held that restriction on the electronic credit ledger under Rule 86A(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017 cannot continue beyond one year from the date of im]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Divergent Rulings on Consolidation of Multiple Financial Years in Single SCN</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/divergent-rulings-on-consolidation-of-multiple-financial-years-in-single-scn-5979.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2026 11:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of M/s. Technosys Integrated Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors. [W.P.(C) 5581/2025, order dated March 16, 2026] held that consolidation of multiple financial years in a single Show Cause Notice (SCN) and adjudication order is permissible under Section]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Negative blocking of ITC under Rule 86A is impermissible - only available credit can be blocked</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/negative-blocking-of-itc-under-rule-86a-is-impermissible-only-available-credit-can-be-blocked-5978.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2026 11:09:53 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Hemang Bipin Varaiya v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. [Writ Petition No. 3452 Of 2026, order dated March 18, 2026] held that negative blocking of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017 is not permissible as the Rule mandates ‘the]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>GST Show Cause Notices Can Cover Multiple Financial Years: No Statutory Bar Under Sections 73/74 of the GST Act: Karnataka HC</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/gst-show-cause-notices-can-cover-multiple-financial-years-no-statutory-bar-under-sections-73-74-of-the-gst-act-karnataka-hc-5977.asp</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 May 2026 11:02:36 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court (Division Bench) in The Commissioner of Central Tax v. Chimney Hills Education Society [Writ Appeal No. 1751 of 2024 (T-RES) and connected matters dated April 23, 2026] allowed the intra-court appeals filed by the Revenue, setting aside the orders of the learned Sing]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Restriction of IDS Refund on Edible Oils can't be applied retrospectively for past period</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/restriction-of-ids-refund-on-edible-oils-can-t-be-applied-retrospectively-for-past-period-5976.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 May 2026 11:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu in the case of Bharat Oil Traders v. Assistant Commissioner &Anr. [WP(C) No. 192/2023, order dated January 2, 2026] held that amendment to Explanation (2)(e) Section 54 CGST Act, 2017 w.e.f. February 1, 2019 substituting "relevant date" f]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>GST registration cannot be cancelled on the basis of a vague show-cause notice</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/gst-registration-cannot-be-cancelled-on-the-basis-of-a-vague-show-cause-notice-5975.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 May 2026 10:57:38 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Gauhati High Court in the case of Shashi Kumar Choudhury v. Union of India & Ors. [WP(C) No. 878/2026, order dated February 17, 2026] held that a show-cause notice proposing cancellation of GST registration which merely reproduces statutory provisions without disclosing the tax period, i]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Employees Cannot Be Penalised under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, Without Being 'Taxable Persons' and Retaining Transactional Benefit</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/employees-cannot-be-penalised-under-section-122-1a-of-the-cgst-act-without-being-taxable-persons-and-retaining-transactional-benefit-5974.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 May 2026 10:57:37 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Amit Manilal Haria & Ors. v. Joint Commissioner of CGST& Central Excise & Ors. [Writ Petition No. 5001 of 2025, order dated February 25, 2026] held that penalty under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act cannot be imposed on company employees unless they are ']]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/no-demand-of-taxes-under-reverse-charge-if-tax-already-discharged-by-service-provider-under-forward-charge-5973.asp</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The CESTAT, Hyderabad in the case of M/s Arunachala Logistics (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Tax, Hyderabad [Service Tax Appeal No. 30548 of 2018, Final Order No. A/30129/2026, order dated February 27, 2026] held that where the entire service tax liability has already been discharged by the ser]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Refund of Tax Paid Twice by Mistake Cannot Be Denied on Ground of Limitation under Section 54 of the GST Act</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/refund-of-tax-paid-twice-by-mistake-cannot-be-denied-on-ground-of-limitation-under-section-54-of-the-gst-act-5972.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 10:28:40 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of Rajendra Narayan Mohanty v. Joint Commissioner of State Tax [W.P.(C) No. 2271 of 2026, order dated February 12, 2026] held that refund claimed in respect of tax paid erroneously or under mistaken notion cannot be denied solely on the ground of limitation]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
