<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title> CAclubindia.com : judiciary</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/</link>
<generator>https://www.caclubindia.com/</generator>
<item>
<title>Partners of a Partnership Firm are personally liable for GST dues of the Firm and bank account of an erstwhile partner can be attached for recovery</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/partners-of-a-partnership-firm-are-personally-liable-for-gst-dues-of-the-firm-and-bank-account-of-an-erstwhile-partner-can-be-attached-for-recovery-6105.asp</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:23:32 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s. VRAA and Co. v. Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Guindy Division [W.P. No. 22458 of 2026 dated June 23, 2026] dismissed the writ petition filed by a partnership firm challenging the attachment of the bank account of its erstwhile par]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Prima facie satisfaction and not conclusive proof of fraud is sufficient to invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/prima-facie-satisfaction-and-not-conclusive-proof-of-fraud-is-sufficient-to-invoke-section-74-of-the-cgst-act-6104.asp</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:23:31 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Fastenex Private Limited & Ors. v. State Tax Officer & Ors. [W.P. Nos. 35967, 35970, 35974 and 35976 of 2024 & Ors. dated June 08, 2026] , while deciding a batch of nearly 250 writ petitions challenging proceedings initiated under Section 74 of the Central Goods and]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Show Cause Notice issued to a non-existent amalgamated company is void ab initio and cannot be saved by Section 87 of the CGST Act</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/show-cause-notice-issued-to-a-non-existent-amalgamated-company-is-void-ab-initio-and-cannot-be-saved-by-section-87-of-the-cgst-act-6103.asp</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:40:12 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Kanakia Spaces Realty Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition No. 2586 of 2026 dated June 24, 2026] set aside the Order-in-Original confirming a GST demand of Rs. 42.65 crores which was passed on the basis of a Show Cause Notice issued und]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>SC Landmark Ruling: Mechanical Invocation of Fraud Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/sc-landmark-ruling-mechanical-invocation-of-fraud-cannot-extend-limitation-under-section-74-of-the-cgst-act-6102.asp</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:46:35 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s G.R. Infra Projects Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 11277 of 2026 dated August 19, 2026]  set aside the Show Cause Notice dated June 13, 2025 issued under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) read]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>CESTAT Sets Aside ₹60 Crore Service Tax Demand: Best-Judgment Assessment Cannot Be Based on Guesswork</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/cestat-sets-aside-60-crore-service-tax-demand-best-judgment-assessment-cannot-be-based-on-guesswork-6101.asp</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:27:55 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The CESTAT, New Delhi Principal Bench, in M/s. Twenty Four Guarding Private Limited v. Commissioner, CGST, Delhi (East), Final Order No. 51353/2026 dated 20.08.2026, examined a substantial Service Tax/CENVAT dispute involving eight Show Cause Notices covering FY 2005-06 to June 2017. The adjudicatin]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>CESTAT: Excess Service Tax Paid by Mistake Is a Deposit — Refund Not Barred by Section 11B Limitation</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/cestat-excess-service-tax-paid-by-mistake-is-a-deposit-refund-not-barred-by-section-11b-limitation-6100.asp</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:27:55 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The CESTAT New Delhi, Principal Bench, in M/s. Vinayak Tour & Travels v. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Indore, Final Order No. 51354/2026 dated 20.08.2026, has allowed the assessee’s appeal concerning refund of excess service tax paid inadvertently.]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>CESTAT Upholds Customs Duty Demand on Undervaluation of Imported Goods Based on Chinese Customs Documents</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/cestat-upholds-customs-duty-demand-on-undervaluation-of-imported-goods-based-on-chinese-customs-documents-6099.asp</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The CESTAT, New Delhi, in Commissioner of Customs & Excise v. M/s Premier Plastic Industries [Customs Appeal Nos. 52896, 52897 & 52904 of 2016; Final Order Nos. 51356-51358/2026, dated 21.08.2026], allowed all three departmental appeals and restored the differential customs duty demands.]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>CESTAT Denies Service Tax Exemption on Rent to Educational Institution for Lack of Evidence</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/cestat-denies-service-tax-exemption-on-rent-to-educational-institution-for-lack-of-evidence-6098.asp</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The CESTAT, New Delhi, in M/s Om Prakash Bajaj v. Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Jaipur [Service Tax Appeal No. 50266 of 2021; Final Order No. 51355/2026, dated 21.08.2026], partly allowed the appeal concerning exemption under Clause 9(b) of Notification No. 25/2012-ST.]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>IGST Paid Under a Wrong Head to be Adjusted Against CGST/SGST Liability Before Any Recovery of Tax Interest or Penalty</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/igst-paid-under-a-wrong-head-to-be-adjusted-against-cgst-sgst-liability-before-any-recovery-of-tax-interest-or-penalty-6097.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in M/s. GR Tech Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit) & Ors. [Writ Petition No. 15670 of 2026 (T-RES) dated June 03, 2026] allowed the writ petition in part, thereby quashing the Adjudication Order, the Order-in-Appeal, and the cons]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
<item>
<title>Assessee entitled to fresh opportunity of hearing where adjudicating authority ignored reply filed to DRC-01A intimation</title>
<link>https://www.caclubindia.com/judiciary/assessee-entitled-to-fresh-opportunity-of-hearing-where-adjudicating-authority-ignored-reply-filed-to-drc-01a-intimation-6096.asp</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[
The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of M/s K.K. Steel Traders v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Ors. [Writ Petition No. 13670 of 2026 (T-RES) dated June 10, 2026] disposed of the writ petition filed against the ex parte adjudication order passed under Section 74 of the Central]]>
</description>
<author>CCI Team</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
