<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Center on Budget: Tax — Federal</title>
	<description>Tax — Federal News feed</description>
	<link>http://www.cbpp.org/research/?fa=topic&amp;id=30</link>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright 2008 Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:00:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>   
   	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	
	
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CBPP-TaxFederal" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
			<title>State Earned Income Tax Credits: 2009 Legislative Update</title>
			<description>An Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) modeled on the federal program of the same name is now offered in 23 states and the District of Columbia as a way to         reduce taxes and supplement wages for low- and moderate-income working families. A large body of evidence has shown that the state and federal EITCs         serve a number of important public policy goals. States that enact EITCs can reduce child poverty, cut taxes for low-income families, and increase the         incentive to work.&amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/V3_iTTABm2w/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2987</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:56:40 -0500</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2987</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>House Health Bill's High-Income Surcharge is Sound and Well Targeted</title>
			<description>
A 5.4 percent surcharge on couples with incomes over $1 million, a key financing feature of the House health reform bill, is sound and well targeted.         It would affect just a fraction of 1 percent of taxpayers, a group whose incomes have soared and tax burdens have fallen in recent years, and would         have only a modest impact on small businesses.
Reforming the health care system to provide universal health coverage and slow the growth of health care costs is an urgent national &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/zwg5-hOTukQ/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2984</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:09:15 -0500</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2984</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Berkley Estate Tax Bill Would Add Billions to Deficit While Benefiting Only Wealthiest 1 in 500 Estates</title>
			<description>A new estate tax bill introduced by Representative Shelley Berkley (D-NV) and others would cost $119 billion more over the first decade (2012-2021)         than extending the tax under its current rules as the President has proposed, yet would benefit only the nation&amp;rsquo;s wealthiest 0.2 percent of estates         since they are the only ones subject to the tax under the current rules. In subsequent decades, the Berkley proposal (H.R. 3905) would be even more         expensive compared to &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/mjea-S9_o0s/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2972</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:57:23 -0500</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2972</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Proposed Expansions of Homebuyer Tax Credit Would Be Highly Inefficient and Squander Federal Resources</title>
			<description>
Executive Summary
Members of Congress are considering extending &amp;mdash; and possibly substantially expanding &amp;mdash; the $8,000 homebuyer tax credit enacted as part of the American         Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. The credit, which is available to first-time homebuyers with incomes up to $150,000 (up to $75,000 for         individuals), expires on December 1 of this year.
The evidence strongly indicates that Congress should show restraint, especially in considering &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/pb_xGoQ6sNE/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2965</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:38:52 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2965</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Excise Tax on Very High-Cost Health Plans Is a Sound Element of Health Reform</title>
			<description>
An excise tax on very high-cost health plans, which the Senate Finance Committee included in its health reform bill, represents a sound way to help pay         for health reform. The excise tax finances nearly a quarter of the costs of the Finance Committee bill over the first ten years ($201 billion out of         $829 billion) and makes a major contribution to the deficit reduction that the bill would achieve in later decades. It would help to slow the rate of         health care cost &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/nZ-WOIe9k8Y/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2957</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:12:24 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2957</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Reversing the Erosion in Alcohol Taxes Could Help Pay for Health Care Reform</title>
			<description> 
To help pay for health care legislation that extends health insurance to all Americans and slows the growth of health care costs, Congress should consider reversing the substantial real decline in recent decades in federal excise taxes on alcohol. This paper, which is part of a series of papers on proposals to help pay for health reform, outlines three options Congress could consider for increasing alcohol taxes that would raise $27 billion to about $100 billion over ten years.&amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/5jMgNPmQz28/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2828</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:33:39 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2828</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Curbing Flexible Spending Accounts Could Help Pay For Health Care Reform</title>
			<description> 
Congress should consider scaling back or eliminating health care flexible spending accounts (FSAs)            [1] as part of its             effort to pay for health care reform.  This paper, which is part of             a series of papers on proposals to help pay for health reform,             outlines several ways in which Congress could curtail FSAs.
FSAs are designed to allow employees to pay out-of-pocket health             care costs with pre-tax dollars.  Employees have a set amount  &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/-abK4eKEa8I/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2829</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:36:42 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2829</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Limiting the Tax Exclusion for Employer-Sponsored Insurance Can Help Pay for Health Reform</title>
			<description> 
Limiting the tax exclusion for  employer-sponsored health insurance could provide significant revenues for  health reform without eroding employer-sponsored insurance or causing other  undesirable side effects — if the cap and the rest of the health reform  legislation are well designed and contain several key features that past  proposals have lacked.    Limiting the tax exclusion deserves serious consideration for             several reasons.
First, the exclusion is poorly designed, &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/Mrebj1z5nyk/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2832</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:32:46 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2832</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>An Excise Tax on Insurers Offering High-Cost Plans Can Help Pay for Health Reform</title>
			<description> 
The federal government provides substantial tax subsidies for health insurance, especially for high-cost insurance plans for people with high incomes.          The Senate Finance Committee is considering placing an excise tax on insurance companies that offer very high-cost health insurance plans.  This         proposal would help achieve two important objectives:

    It would provide a significant source of funding for subsidies to enable families of modest means to afford health &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/4g9nEZ1dYlc/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2887</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:27:19 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2887</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Podcast: High-Income Surcharge Can Help Pay for Health Reform</title>
			<description>Chuck Marr, director of federal tax policy, discusses the need for health  reform and one option to help pay for it: a surcharge on high-income households  under consideration by the House of Representatives.
Duration: 4:43</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/sidersbOvdI/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2897</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:29:58 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2897</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Senate Finance Committee Health Reform Bill Is Fiscally Responsible</title>
			<description>
A fundamental principle of the bill that the Senate Finance Committee approved today is that it is budget neutral — that is, its costs are fully         offset. It pays for the costs of expanding health coverage to the uninsured by redirecting spending and tax subsidies from less productive uses         elsewhere in the health sector.
Several of the offsets are likely to help slow the rate of growth of health care costs over time. For example, the bill would impose an excise tax on         &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/tRHLUc8IJLQ/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2920</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:28:32 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2920</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Tax Offsets in Baucus Health Plan Are Sound But Can Be Improved</title>
			<description>
The health reform proposal by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus would place a 35-percent excise tax on the value of health plans in excess         of $8,000 for singles and $21,000 for families, starting in 2013; these thresholds would be indexed for inflation in later years.  The excise tax is a         sound way to help pay for health reform, but it has some shortcomings that can and should be addressed.  Policymakers should modify the proposal to         avoid unfairly affecting &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/m1D6YR2-O7c/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2924</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:21:04 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2924</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Coalition Makes Flawed Arguments Against Proposal to Help Finance Health Reform by Maintaining Current Value of Itemized Deductions for Wealthy Households</title>
			<description>
A coalition consisting of several trade associations for foundations and some nonprofit organizations along with a number of large charities has raised         objections to a proposal that would help finance improved health coverage for low- and moderate-income people by maintaining the value of itemized         deductions for wealthy Americans at its current level.
Under current law, the value of those deductions is scheduled to rise after 2010 when the 2001 tax-rate reductions are slated &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/I3QbaehRaMk/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2934</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:39:47 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2934</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Taxing High-Sugar Soft Drinks Could Help Pay For Health Care Reform</title>
			<description> 
By establishing a tax on high-sugar soft drinks, Congress could             help finance health care reform that extends health insurance to             all Americans and slows the growth of health care costs, while also             improving Americans&amp;rsquo; health.  This paper, which is part of a series             of papers on proposals to help pay for health reform, outlines             issues related to such a tax.  Depending on how it is designed,             such a tax has the &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/s3QcqY4mljs/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2830</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2830</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Banning Taxation of Online Hotel Reservations Is Unwarranted and Could Cost States and Localities Billions of Dollars</title>
			<description>Summary
A draft amendment to the Travel Promotion Act of 2009 (S. 1023), which the Senate plans to take up in early September, would ban state and local         taxation of hotel room rentals when booked by a travel agent or through an online travel company (OTC) like Expedia or Priceline.  In its current form         the amendment would immediately deprive states and localities of more than $680 million in annual hotel tax receipts.  It would also prevent them from         collecting at least &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/qzf_lxJAk9c/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2903</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2903</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>House Health Bill's High-Income Surcharge: A Reasonable Approach</title>
			<description>
Reforming the health care system to provide universal health coverage is an urgent priority.  But, facing huge projected budget deficits that have the         nation on an unsustainable fiscal path, the White House and Congress must enact a health reform plan that is also fully financed and that reduces the         growth rate of health care costs over the long term.
Policymakers have been considering two major proposals to help finance health care reform that represent sound tax policy:  &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/ysXoi_xFIh8/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2874</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2874</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Podcast: The Estate Tax</title>
			<description>Director of Federal Tax Policy, Chuck Marr, discusses the basics of the estate tax and the debate about it in Congress.</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/9VVa4d79LEk/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2873</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2873</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Reports Calling for Estate Tax Repeal Seriously Flawed</title>
			<description>Despite questionable reports to the contrary, repealing the estate tax would weaken the economy by adding nearly $800 billion to budget deficits over         10 years, thus reducing national saving and leaving fewer funds for investment that leads to higher productivity in the long run.
Two recent reports from the American Family Business Foundation, a group funded by wealthy families that stand to receive large windfalls if Congress         repeals the estate tax, implausibly claim that &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/iFCza1muzws/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2861</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2861</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Maintaining Current Value of Itemized Deductions For High-Income Taxpayers Could Help Pay For Health Care Reform</title>
			<description>If Congress rejects the President&amp;rsquo;s proposal to help pay for health care reform by limiting the value of itemized deductions for high-income filers, it should at least prevent those subsidies from expanding in 2011, as they would under current law.
Simply keeping the value of itemized deductions for filers in the top two brackets at their current levels of 33 and 35 percent, rather than allowing it to expand when those tax rates rise to 36 and 39.6 percent respectively, would raise $68 &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/mGX1rTqR6aA/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2838</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2838</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Video: Robert Greenstein Discusses the President's Budget on Washington Journal</title>
			<description />
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/B7AjNzPiiGM/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2808</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2808</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Statement: Chuck Marr, Director of Federal Tax Policy, on the Administration's International Tax Proposal</title>
			<description>The Administration&amp;rsquo;s proposal is a welcome step forward in tax             policy because it would make the tax code more balanced, support             research and development, and promote fiscal responsibility.
Specifically, it would tighten lax international tax rules and             crack down on foreign tax havens, and it would use the resulting             proceeds to finance a permanent incentive for companies to invest             in research and development, as well as for &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/mcYLygg31vU/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2804</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2804</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>A Brief Analysis of the Congressional Budget Plan</title>
			<description>The budget resolution Congress adopted last week for fiscal             year 2010[1] largely             reflects the proposals in the preliminary budget President Obama             submitted to Congress in February.  Under the budget resolution:

    Deficits will be very high by historical standards in the             next several years but will decline substantially by 2014.  Over             the 2010-2014 period as a whole, deficits will be $824 billion             lower than if no &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/6WnSNmuDWz4/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2802</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2802</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Income Gaps Hit Record Levels In 2006, New Data Show</title>
			<description>New data from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) show that in 2006, the top 1 percent of households had a larger share of the nation&amp;rsquo;s after-tax income, and the middle and bottom fifths of households had smaller shares, than in any year since 1979, the first year the CBO data cover. As a result, the gaps in after-tax incomes between households in the top 1 percent and those in the middle and bottom fifths were the widest on record.
The data reveal starkly uneven income growth over &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/6m1eOk3cq1Y/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2789</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2789</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>The Senate and the Estate Tax:  Cutting Through the Fog</title>
			<description>Earlier this month, the Senate voted on an amendment to the budget resolution, offered by Senators Jon Kyl and Blanche Lincoln, to shrink the estate tax in various ways. A number of major newspapers, including the New York Times and Washington Post, editorialized strongly against this proposal. Senators Kyl and Lincoln wrote letters to these newspapers in response.[1]
These letters are significant because they concisely crystallize the key arguments that proponents of &amp;hellip;</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/uX0PduEAI5w/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2788</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2788</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
		<item>
			<title>Huffington Post Op-Ed: Senate to Uber-Rich: “Help Is on the Way”</title>
			<description>&amp;quot;...Is this the time to spend about $90 billion over the next decade to give the nation's wealthiest households a new, multi-million-dollar tax cut? The U.S. Senate apparently thinks so.&amp;quot;  Read more</description>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBPP-TaxFederal/~3/4tmZmjkJsok/</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2784</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=2784</feedburner:origLink></item>	
	
	
</channel>
</rss>
