<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:14:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Trademark Infringement</category><category>Lawsuit</category><category>Lawyers</category><category>TTAB</category><category>Trade Secret</category><category>blogging</category><title>The Austin Trademark Lawyer</title><description>Musings on Trademark Law From a Decidedly Texas Perspective</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>16</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-1025844497218669227</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-30T07:07:36.138-05:00</atom:updated><title>Who Owns the name Black Sabbath?</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&#39;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&#39;&gt;Ozzy Osbourne filed &lt;a href=&#39;http://www.austin360.com/news/content/shared-gen/ap/Recordings/US_People_Ozzy_Osbourne.html&#39;&gt;suit &lt;/a&gt;this week against guitarist Tony Iommi for claiming ownership of the band&#39;s name.  Iommi claims that Ozzy and the other band founders relinquished their rights to the name in the 1980s.  Iommi&#39;s federal &lt;a href=&#39;http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;amp;entry=75688875&#39;&gt;registration &lt;/a&gt;for &quot;Black Sabbath&quot; issued back in 2000.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Here&#39;s Tony, Ozzy and the boys in happier days: &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; &lt;div class=&#39;youtube-video&#39;&gt;&lt;object height=&#39;355&#39; width=&#39;425&#39;&gt;&lt;param value=&#39;http://www.youtube.com/v/UcSC0B6lbFg&#39; name=&#39;movie&#39;&gt; &lt;/param&gt;&lt;param value=&#39;transparent&#39; name=&#39;wmode&#39;&gt; &lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed height=&#39;355&#39; width=&#39;425&#39; wmode=&#39;transparent&#39; type=&#39;application/x-shockwave-flash&#39; src=&#39;http://www.youtube.com/v/UcSC0B6lbFg&#39;&gt; &lt;/embed&gt;  &lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Black Sabbath - Paranoid&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;div class=&#39;zemanta-pixie&#39;&gt;&lt;img src=&#39;http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=6a01d6ea-92f7-882d-8279-dfac54668763&#39; class=&#39;zemanta-pixie-img&#39;/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/05/who-owns-name-black-sabbath.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-4535698046163943915</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-18T08:07:19.553-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lawsuit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Trademark Infringement</category><title>&amp;quot;We speak cars&amp;quot; lands Ford in infringement suit</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;...but the suit was apparently quickly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09108/963791-55.stm&quot;&gt;resolved&lt;/a&gt; (unlike the &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=HG-GnTqEqXoC&amp;amp;pg=PA173&amp;amp;dq=In+1998,+Enterprise+Rent-A-Car+filed+lawsuits+against+Rent-A-Wreck+of+America+%28a+tiny+rental+company%29+and+Hertz+Corp.+and+threatened+to+file+lawsuits&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&quot;&gt;notorious &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&quot;&lt;i&gt;We&#39;ll pick you up&lt;/i&gt;&quot; lawsuit between Enterprise Rent-A-Car and Advantage Rent-a-Car, which went &lt;a href=&quot;http://openjurist.org/238/f3d/378&quot;&gt;on &lt;/a&gt;...and &lt;a href=&quot;http://openjurist.org/330/f3d/1333/enterprise-rent-a-car-company-v-advantage-rent-a-car-inc&quot;&gt;on&lt;/a&gt;...)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;zemanta-pixie&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=a6cb52ad-6c13-8cf8-bb82-7840acb4eacf&quot; class=&quot;zemanta-pixie-img&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/04/speak-cars-lands-ford-in-infringement.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-8237449834889232249</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-18T08:35:48.681-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lawsuit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lawyers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Trademark Infringement</category><title>The Dumbest Trademark Demand Letter?</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://randazza.wordpress.com/&quot;&gt;Marc Randazza&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://randazza.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/goldman-sachs-tries-to-bully-blogger/&quot;&gt;points to &lt;/a&gt;one of the&lt;a href=&quot;http://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/chad-parke-demand-to-gs666.jpg&quot;&gt; dumbest trademark demand letters&lt;/a&gt; he&#39;s ever read:  dumb not because it has &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/04/i_dont_think_it.html&quot;&gt;the misplaced certitude, the overblown rhetoric, the baseless imputation of evil to the recipient, and over-all lack of self-awareness&lt;/a&gt;&quot; that Marty Schwimmer would consider denoting a truly dumb demand letter (BTW: great wording, &lt;span class=&quot;post-footers&quot;&gt;Marty!); but rather because it asserted a ridiculous claim, which led to the filing of &lt;a href=&quot;http://suffolkmedialaw.com/2009/04/16/defending-blogger-rights-against-corporate-bullies/&quot;&gt;declaratory judgment action&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overzealous lawyer, or over-reaching client?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;UPDATE:  &lt;/span&gt;Ron Coleman &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=2449&quot;&gt;adds&lt;/a&gt; &quot;When will they ever learn?&quot;  Exactly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;post-footers&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;    &lt;div style=&quot;margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;&quot; class=&quot;zemanta-pixie&quot;&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;zemanta-pixie-a&quot; href=&quot;http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/e519855b-8e30-8037-b488-be48237bf589/&quot; title=&quot;Zemified by Zemanta&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;border: medium none ; float: right;&quot; class=&quot;zemanta-pixie-img&quot; src=&quot;http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e519855b-8e30-8037-b488-be48237bf589&quot; alt=&quot;Reblog this post [with Zemanta]&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;zem-script more-related&quot;&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js&quot; defer=&quot;defer&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/04/dumbest-trademark-demand-letter.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>4</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-7049462400288469860</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-28T18:01:12.670-06:00</atom:updated><title>Meet The Bloggers V at INTA</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&#39;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&#39;&gt;&lt;img src=&#39;http://www.inta.org/images/stories/annualmeeting/Seattle/2008_am09banner570.jpg&#39; style=&#39;max-width: 800px;&#39;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&#39;http://www.grahamdunn.com/go/professionals/atkins-michael-g&#39;&gt;Michael Atkins&lt;/a&gt; (a/k/a the &lt;a href=&#39;http://seattletrademarklawyer.com/&#39;&gt;Seattle Trademark Lawyer&lt;/a&gt;) has graciously offered to host &quot;&lt;a href=&#39;http://seattletrademarklawyer.com/blog/2009/2/26/save-the-date-for-meet-the-bloggers-v-at-inta-seattle-on-the.html&#39;&gt;Meet the Bloggers V&lt;/a&gt;&quot; at this year&#39;s &lt;a href=&#39;http://www.inta.org/index.php?option=com_intaevents&amp;amp;task=eventdetails&amp;amp;id=1244&amp;amp;catid=11&amp;amp;parentid=0&amp;amp;Itemid=67&amp;amp;getcontent=2&#39;&gt;INTA Annual Meeting &lt;/a&gt;in Seattle.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date:&lt;/strong&gt; Monday, May 18&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Time:&lt;/strong&gt; 6-9 p.m.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Place:&lt;/strong&gt; Graham &amp;amp; Dunn, Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way, Suite 300, Seattle&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;div class=&#39;zemanta-pixie&#39;&gt;&lt;img src=&#39;http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=b7f886ae-e71b-42fc-8958-c0ac18c13d05&#39; class=&#39;zemanta-pixie-img&#39;/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/02/meet-bloggers-v-at-inta.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-5284847929185226948</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-28T17:50:39.747-06:00</atom:updated><title>iFart lawsuit making some noise</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&#39;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&#39;&gt;Lots of &lt;a href=&#39;http://fragerfactor.blogspot.com/2009/02/ifart-com.html&#39;&gt;recent &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&#39;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/17/ifart_versus_pull_my_finger/&#39;&gt;postings &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&#39;http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/02/17/flatulence.fight/&#39;&gt;press &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&#39;http://www.coloradoan.com/article/20090219/LOVELAND0102/90219025&#39;&gt;on &lt;/a&gt;the iFart v. Pull My Finger lawsuit (best headline so far:  &lt;a href=&#39;http://battermanlaw.com/blog/2009/02/27/odor-in-the-court/&#39;&gt;Odor In The Court&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;div class=&#39;zemanta-pixie&#39;&gt;&lt;img src=&#39;http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=ac012804-1540-4af6-925e-ff2bdda54b0f&#39; class=&#39;zemanta-pixie-img&#39;/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/02/ifart-lawsuit-making-some-noise.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-2995428666325648905</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-13T21:34:20.026-06:00</atom:updated><title>Who says Trademark Lawyers are just Hot Air?</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&#39;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&#39;&gt;InfoMedia Inc., creator of the &lt;a href=&#39;http://ifartmobile.com/&#39;&gt;iFart Mobile&lt;/a&gt; application, filed a federal lawsuit against &lt;a href=&#39;http://air-o-matic.com/&#39;&gt;Air-O-Matic,&lt;/a&gt; Inc. seeking a declaratory judgment that its use of &quot;pull my finger&quot; was &lt;a href=&#39;http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/1115.html&#39;&gt;fair use&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyone else surpised that the case wasn&#39;t filed in Chicago (the &quot;&lt;a href=&#39;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windy_City,_Origin_of_Name_%28Chicago%29&#39;&gt;Windy City&lt;/a&gt;&quot;)?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/02/who-says-trademark-lawyers-are-just-hot.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-7558136843272683339</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-05T17:42:48.507-06:00</atom:updated><title>Now here&amp;#39;s one way to respond to a demand letter...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&#39;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&#39;&gt;&lt;a href=&#39;http://www.dominos.com/home/index.jsp&#39;&gt;Heh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/02/now-here-one-way-to-respond-to-demand.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-666006092178121189</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-04T17:44:08.905-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">TTAB</category><title>TTABlog&amp;#39;s Top TTAB Decisions for 2008</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ll-a.com/firm_directory/Bio-John_Welch.cfm&quot;&gt;John Welch&lt;/a&gt; over at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://thettablog.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;TTABlog&lt;/a&gt; has posted his annual listing of the Top Ten TTAB Decisions (part one is &lt;a href=&quot;http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2009/02/top-ten-ttab-decisions-of-2008-part-1.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and part two is &lt;a href=&quot;http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2009/02/top-ten-ttab-decisions-of-2008-part-2.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you don&#39;t subscribe to the TTABlog, you should!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Technorati Tags: &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/TTAB&quot; class=&quot;performancingtags&quot;&gt;TTAB&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/02/ttablog-top-ttab-decisions-for-2008.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-1868007617982407373</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-04T17:42:51.583-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lawsuit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Trademark Infringement</category><title>Oh this is rich....</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mosessinger.com/mschwimmer/&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mosessinger.com/mschwimmer/&quot;&gt;Martin Schwimmer&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/&quot;&gt;The Trademark Blog&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2009/02/your_tax_dollar_1.html#comments&quot;&gt;reports &lt;/a&gt;that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citigroup.com/citi/homepage/&quot;&gt;CitiGroup&lt;/a&gt;, fresh on the heels of their $&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jH-roVuf8guSySLbZOu-W-fQGJzAD964CBVG0&quot;&gt;45 Billion federal bailout&lt;/a&gt; last year, has sued a Brooklyn pawn shop which had been using the name &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.allcitipawn.com/&quot;&gt;ALL CITI PAWN&lt;/a&gt;.  (Martin has posted a copy of the Complaint on his blog and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scribd.com/doc/11615656/Complaint-All-Citi-Pawn&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;technorati-tags&quot;&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/Lawsuits&quot;&gt;Lawsuits&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/Trademark%20Infringement&quot;&gt;Trademark Infringement&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/02/oh-this-is-rich.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-3198608720628223801</guid><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-04T17:43:21.611-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lawsuit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lawyers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Trademark Infringement</category><title>Settling a Trademark Dispute by Kicking the Lawyers Out</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zemanta.com/welcome/&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weidemiller.com/RyanGile.html&quot;&gt;Ryan Gile&lt;/a&gt; (aka the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vegastrademarkattorney.com/&quot;&gt;Las Vegas Trademark Attorney&lt;/a&gt;), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vegastrademarkattorney.com/2009/01/monster-cable-and-monster-mini-golf.html&quot;&gt;reports &lt;/a&gt;that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.monstercable.com/&quot;&gt;Monster Cable&lt;/a&gt; vs. Monster Mini Golf trademark dispute has apparently settled.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best takeaway is in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vegastrademarkattorney.com/2009/01/monster-cable-and-monster-mini-golf.html?showComment=1232905920000#c3913762723565387852&quot;&gt;comment &lt;/a&gt;posted by Monster Mini Golf:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;The turning point came when we were on a conference call with Noel and Kevin Lee, and lawyers from both sides, and we were getting absolutely nowhere with lawyers governing every move. About an hour into it, it got so annoying, that &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;someone suggested kicking all the lawyers out, and we all agreed to give that a try&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;. From there, the conversation flowed pretty smoothly, and we were able to speak freely and frankly with Noel and Kevin, and both sides got an understanding of each other&#39;s positions.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;When are we lawyers going to realize that it&#39;s not all about us?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;technorati-tags&quot;&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/Lawsuit&quot;&gt;Lawsuit&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/Trademark%20Infringement&quot;&gt;Trademark Infringement&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;tag&quot; href=&quot;http://technorati.com/tag/Lawyers&quot;&gt;Lawyers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/01/settling-trademark-dispute-by-kicking.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-6757113456932075568</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-30T15:27:25.508-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lawsuit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Trademark Infringement</category><title>American Idol comes to Austin (or at least their attorneys do)</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fremantlemedia.com/&quot;&gt;FremantleMedia&lt;/a&gt;, owner of the TV show &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanidol.com/&quot;&gt;American Idol&lt;/a&gt;, has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/texassouthwest/stories/DN-stripperidol_13tex.ART.State.Edition1.4b919b4.html&quot;&gt;sued&lt;/a&gt; Austin&#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palaziomensclub.com/&quot;&gt;Palazio &lt;/a&gt;Men&#39;s Club, for their use of &quot;Stripper Idol.&quot;  A copy of the complaint can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scribd.com/share/upload/8406798/c0n4lmjry92sng5ypnz&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The various &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,479840,00.html&quot;&gt;media &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmz.com/2008/12/18/a-i-suing-the-pants-off-stripper-idol/&quot;&gt;reports &lt;/a&gt;all seem to focus on the issue of likelihood of confusion (which doesn&#39;t strike me as very strong), yet ignoring the dilution by tarnishment claim (which seems like a slam dunk).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/01/american-idol-comes-to-austin-or-at.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-3145668083411930998</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-29T23:22:03.690-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Trademark Infringement</category><title>Project Runway judge Michael Kors sued for infringement</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/alltherage/2009/01/inspiration-or.html&quot;&gt;LA Times&lt;/a&gt; is reporting that designer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.michaelkors.com/&quot;&gt;Michael Kors&lt;/a&gt; has been sued for trademark infringement by the estate of artist/designer &lt;a href=&quot;http://tonyduquette.com/&quot;&gt;Tony Duquette&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bravotv.com/Project_Runway/season/5/index.php&quot;&gt;Project Runway&lt;/a&gt; Season 4 winner &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bravotv.com/Project_Runway/season/4/bios/index.php?cat=designer&amp;amp;p=christian&quot;&gt;Christian&lt;/a&gt; might say, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdSWvzsuYnc&quot;&gt;Fierce!&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/01/project-runway-judge-michael-kors-sued.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-6226445281422738948</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-29T16:27:18.026-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Trade Secret</category><title>An Education on Trade Secret Protection from NBC&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;THE OFFICE&amp;quot;</title><description>&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;Who says prime time TV isn&#39;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/2009/01/articles/trade-secrets/protect-your-trade-secrets-from-dunder-mifflin/&quot;&gt;educational&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/01/education-on-trade-secret-protection.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-8653506409116000958</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-29T16:27:01.323-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Trademark Infringement</category><title>THE ORIGINAL OUTDOOR trademark dispute</title><description>THE ORIGINAL OUTDOOR CLOTHING COMPANY (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woolrich.com/&quot;&gt;Woolrich, Inc&lt;/a&gt;.) is suing THE ORIGINAL OUTDOOR OUTFITTER&lt;span style=&quot;vertical-align: super;font-size:60;&quot; &gt; &lt;/span&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eddiebauer.com/home.jsp&quot;&gt;(Eddie Bauer, Inc&lt;/a&gt;.).  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletrademarklawyer.com/blog/2009/1/29/woolrich-sues-eddie-bauer-in-pennsylvania-for-trademark-infr.html&quot;&gt;Seattle Trademark Lawyer&lt;/a&gt; has the &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletrademarklawyer.com/storage/Woolrich%20Inc.%20v.%20Eddie%20Baurer%20Inc.%20-%20Complaint.pdf&quot;&gt;Complaint&lt;/a&gt;.</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/01/original-outdoor-trademark-dispute.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-775412608142968586</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-28T23:23:51.700-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Trademark Infringement</category><title>He Can&#39;t Drive 55....</title><description>But Sammy Hagar knows the Lanham Act.  Sammy Hagar&#39;s licensing company is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ksee24.com/news/local/38382839.html&quot;&gt;suing &lt;/a&gt;over a Cabo Wabo Cantina restaurant franchise in Fresno California. Check out the Las Vegas Trademark Attorney&#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vegastrademarkattorney.com/2009/01/sammy-hagar-files-lawsuit-against-cabo.html&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;.  (hat tip to &lt;a href=&quot;http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2009/01/28/hagar-not-so-cabo-wabo-with-franchisee/&quot;&gt;Tamera Bennett&lt;/a&gt;).</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/01/he-cant-drive-55.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7136645918085625651.post-8966216631005989133</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-28T23:04:41.620-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">blogging</category><title>Now Here&#39;s the Disclaimer I Wish I Had Used...</title><description>Kudos to the Valerum Law &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.valoremlaw.com/disclaimer.html&quot;&gt;Group&lt;/a&gt;!</description><link>http://austintrademarklawyer.blogspot.com/2009/01/now-heres-disclaimer-i-wish-i-had-used.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Christopher L. Graff)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>