<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The American Vision</title><link>https://americanvision.org/</link><description>Recent content The American Vision</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 07:52:25 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://americanvision.org/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Episode 89: The Puzzle of "This Generation"</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/episode-89-the-puzzle-of-this-generation/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 07:52:25 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/episode-89-the-puzzle-of-this-generation/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;strong>&lt;a href="https://subsplash.com/u/americanvision/give" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Please help us meet a $15K matching challenge here&lt;/a>&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>Bible Prophecy Under the Microscope-Episode 89&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Using the analogy of a puzzle, Gary &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/the-puzzle-of-this-generation" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">points out&lt;/a> that many prophetic systems try to fit biblical facts into their system, but without having the full picture from the front of the puzzle box.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Who does Jesus say will see “all these things”? Certainly not a future audience. “So, you too, when you see all these things.” The first “you” is obviously Jesus’ present audience as is the second “you.” No one reading Matthew 24:33 could conceive that either use of “you” by Jesus refers to an audience different from the audience to whom Jesus was addressing. If Jesus had a future generation in mind, He could have eliminated all confusion by saying, “even so they too, when they see all these things, they will recognize that He is near, right at the door. Truly I say to you, that generation will not pass away until all these things take place.” Of course, that’s not what the verses say.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The use of “this” confirms that the only generation in view is the one in Jesus’ day. As Greek grammar books point out, the near demonstrative “this” is always used in the New Testament to describe what is near in terms of time, place, and distance:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>The demonstrative[s] . . . are of two kinds: near [this/these] and distant [that/those]. The near demonstratives, as the name denotes, points to someone or something “near,” in close proximity. They appear as the singular word “this” and its plural “these.” The distant demonstratives, as their name suggests, appear as “that” (singular), or “those” (plural).&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>We can follow the way Matthew uses the near demonstrative “this” throughout his gospel to see that he has his present audience in view and not one in the distant future: “this way” (6:9), “this day” (6:11), “this fellow” (9:3), “this news” (9:26), “this city” (10:23), “this place” (12:6), “this man” (13:56), “this people” (15:8); “this rock” (15:18), “this desolate place” (15:33), “this little child” (18:4), “this mountain” (21:21), “this stone” (21:44), “this image” (22:20), “this gospel” (24:14), “this generation” (24:34), “this woman” (26:13), “this night” (26:31). “This” refers to what’s near.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>If Jesus had wanted to identify a future generation, He could have chosen the adjective &lt;em>that&lt;/em> to distinguish the generation to whom He was speaking from a future generation (e.g., Matt. 7:22 [“that day” is in the future]; 8:12 [“that place” refers to the place of judgment distant from our place and time]; 10:19 [“that hour” refers to a future time]; 24:10 [“and at that time” refers to a future time but within the time parameters of “this generation”]; 24:36 [“that day and hour” refers to a future day and hour that was near the end of their generation (1 John 2:18; Heb. 10:25), not their present day and hour]; 26:29 [“that day” refers to a time when Jesus is in the kingdom, a future time]).&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/WRWfr_large.png?v=1678474893" alt="Wars and Rumors of Wars">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Wars and Rumors of Wars&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>A first-century interpretation of the Olivet Discourse was once common in commentaries and narrative-style books that describe the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70. There is also a history of skeptics who turn to Bible prophecy and claim Jesus was wrong about the timing of His coming at “the end of the age” and the signs associated with it. A mountain of scholarship shows that the prophecy given by Jesus was fulfilled in exacting detail when He said it would: before the generation of those to whom He was speaking passed away.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/wars-and-rumors-of-wars" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Using the analogy of a puzzle, Gary points out that many prophetic systems try to fit biblical facts into their system, but without having the full picture from the front of the puzzle box. Bible prophecy isn&amp;rsquo;t a stand-alone discipline within biblical interpretation; it must stand alongside everything else taught in Scripture. In other words, it must be consistent with all the Bible teaches from Genesis to Revelation.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/the-puzzle-of-this-generation" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for all episodes of Bible Prophecy Under the Microscope&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>[1] Cullen I K Story and J. Lyle Story, &lt;em>Greek To Me: Learning New Testament Greek Through Memory Visualization&lt;/em> (New York: Harper, 1979), 74. “This” refers “to something comparatively near at hand, just as &lt;em>ekeinos&lt;/em> [that] refers to something comparatively farther away.” William F. Arndt and F. Wilbur Gingrich, &lt;em>A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature&lt;/em>, 4th ed. (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1952), 600. “Sometimes it is desired to call attention with special emphasis to a designated object, whether in the physical vicinity or the speaker or the literary context of the writer. For this purpose the demonstrative construction is used… For that which is relatively near in actuality or thought the immediate demonstrative [&lt;em>houtos&lt;/em>] is used… For that which is relatively distant in actuality or thought the remote demonstrative [&lt;em>ekeinos&lt;/em>] is used.” H. E. Dana and Julius R. Mantey, &lt;em>A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament&lt;/em> (New York; Macmillan, 1957), 127-128, sec. 136.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>“But What about Zechariah 14?”</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/but-what-about-zechariah-14-/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 08:32:57 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/but-what-about-zechariah-14-/</guid><description>&lt;p>No matter how much prophetic material you cover, there are always people who ask, “But what about this verse and that verse?” My first foray into dealing with Bible prophecy was &lt;em>&lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-reduction-of-christianity" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">The Reduction of Christianity: Dave Hunt’s Theology of Cultural Surrender&lt;/a>&lt;/em>, published in 1988. This was followed by &lt;em>&lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-debate-over-christian-reconstruction" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">The Debate over Christian Reconstruction&lt;/a>&lt;/em> that same year. It was a response to a debate that Dr. Gary North and I had with Dave Hunt and Thomas Ice that year in Dallas. In 1991, the first edition of &lt;em>&lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/last-days-madness" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Last Days Madness&lt;/a>&lt;/em> was published by Wolgemuth &amp;amp; Hyatt. Many more books followed, along with articles, debates, and radio interviews.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Each subsequent book and article attempted to answer additional prophetic passages. &lt;em>Last Days Madness&lt;/em> was expanded. I wrote a response to the &lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/left-behind-separating-fact-from-fiction" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Left Behind&lt;/a> series that was published by Thomas Nelson. This was followed by my study of &lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-gog-and-magog-end-time-alliance-israel-russia-and-syria-in-bible-prophecy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Ezekiel 38 and 39 and Zechariah 12&lt;/a>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>No matter how much material I covered, I would always get an email from someone asking, “But what about Zechariah 14?,” as if everything I had written up to that point was negated because I had not dealt with one of the most difficult chapters in the Bible. Well, after many years of tinkering, I have finished my verse-by-verse study of Zechariah 14. Robert Cruickshank joined me in this venture. The result is &lt;em>&lt;strong>&lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/making-prophetic-sense-of-zechariah-14" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Making Prophetic Sense of Zechariah 14&lt;/a>&lt;/strong>&lt;/em>. It’s two commentaries in one. We each take a stab at interpreting the chapter.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Making Prophetic Sense of Zechariah 14&lt;/em> covers a lot of ground, including the history of interpretation going back centuries. As this volume points out, interpretations vary, and some are radically different, even when they agree on the time of fulfillment. There is no consensus, given the fact that it’s one of the most difficult prophetic sections found in Scripture, as many well-known and respected commentators have admitted.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/z14fr_large.png?v=1776945869" alt="Making Prophetic Sense of Zechariah 14">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Making Prophetic Sense of Zechariah 14&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>There was a first audience to receive what was revealed to Zechariah, and much interpretive difficulty arises from failing to understand Scripture as the original readers would have. Can you imagine someone saying, “This is not for us; we can rest easy. It’s really meant for a single generation thousands of years in the future”? The better approach is to investigate the prophecies in terms of their time and place in redemptive history. Zechariah 14 has been interpreted in various ways throughout history. The chapter describes a future “Day of the Lord.” How far in the future is that time, and what events does the final chapter of Zechariah describe?&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/making-prophetic-sense-of-zechariah-14" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Preterists interpret Zechariah 14 as a prophecy that has been mostly fulfilled, and in some cases, fully fulfilled. The earliest era for fulfillment would have been “in the days of the Maccabean Revolt in the early second century B.C.,” a view held by many scholars like Ephraem the Syrian (c. 306-337), Theodore of Mopsuestia (c. 350- 428), Hugo Grotius (1583-1645), John Calvin (1509-1564), Dathius (1773), Hermen Venema (1697-1787).&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong> Calvin observed, “the Prophet meant here to include the calamities which were near at hand, for the city had not yet been built, the Jews having been much harassed by their neighbors; and we also know how atrocious was the tyranny which Antiochus exercised: in short, there was a continued series of evils from the time the city and the temple began to be built till the coming of Christ.”&lt;strong>[2]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In addition to finding fulfillment in events of the post-exilic period, others contend that elements of fulfillment occurred in the first century.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Zechariah 14:1-2 is understood by some preterists as describing the siege and destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in AD 70. Others understand it as a prelude to events leading up to the time of the incarnation, Jesus’ ministry, and culminating in the destruction of the temple in AD 70. The “gathering of nations” against Jerusalem is seen as God using Rome as an instrument of judgment. The “plague” and “rotting flesh” are interpreted as references to the starvation and internal violence during the siege, as described by the eyewitness testimony of Josephus (AD 37-100 in his historical work &lt;em>The Wars of the Jews&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Zechariah 14:3-7 is interpreted as a symbolic fulfillment, not a physical splitting of the Mount of Olives, like John the Baptist’s comments about mountains being brought low and valleys raised (Isa. 40:3-5; Luke 3:6). Some preterists argue that the “feet of the Lord standing on the Mount of Olives” symbolizes Christ’s presence and victory over the Roman Empire, not a physical return. Actually, Jesus did physically stand on the Mount of Olives (Matt. 21:1; Acts 1:12). Zechariah does not say that the Lord comes down and physically stands on the Mount of Olives, but even if it did, there’s precedence for that action (Isa. 19:1). The “splitting” of the mountain is viewed metaphorically representing the breaking down of the barrier between Jew and Gentile, fulfilled in the early Church’s expansion (Eph. 2:14). The “Valley of the Mountains” is seen as a route for the faithful remnant to flee, aligning with the Christian flight to Pella in AD 66.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Key support comes from New Testament parallels: Matthew 23:34-39, where Jesus says the generation alive in His day would see Jerusalem’s destruction; Luke 21:22, which links the siege to the “abomination of desolation”; and Revelation 19, which describes a heavenly celebration after the fall of “Babylon” (symbolizing Jerusalem’s corrupt system).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Notable preterist scholars such as Eusebius (c. AD 260/265-339), Theodoret of Cyrus (c. 393-c. 458/466), and Tertullian (c. 155-c. 220), interpreted Zechariah 14:4 as a prophecy mostly fulfilled in the work of Christ during His earthly ministry. Matthew Henry (1662-1714) notes the imagery of “his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives” (Zech. 14:4) was fulfilled when Jesus ascended from the Mount of Olives (Acts 1:12). The mountain splitting in two—creating a great valley—symbolizes the removal of barriers, particularly the division between Jews and Gentiles, enabling the gospel to spread universally.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Admittedly, as we can see by the various interpretations, Zechariah 14 is difficult to interpret. What follows after the Introduction is a verse-by-verse study of this popular and diversely interpreted chapter. The variety of interpretations over the centuries has been legion; even among the interpretive positions, there are differences. The following is the Editor’s note from John Calvin’s commentary on Zechariah 14:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>[J.A.] &lt;em>Dathius&lt;/em> [1773] truly says, that interpreters have toiled much in the explanation of this chapter, some taking the words in a spiritual sense, others maintaining that what is here said was fulfilled before the coming of Christ, and a third party holding that all is as yet unfulfilled. He was disposed on the whole to assent to the opinion of &lt;em>Grotius&lt;/em>, the same in part with that of Calvin—that this prophecy, as well as some in the preceding chapters, were fulfilled in the times of the Maccabees. See 1 Maccabees 6:26, etc. He indeed admits that this theory does not remove all the difficulties but leaves less than any other.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[Johannes] &lt;em>Marckius&lt;/em> [1656-1731] doubted not but that the beginning of this chapter is a prophecy concerning the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, and he quotes &lt;em>Jerome&lt;/em> [c. 347-420], &lt;em>Cyril&lt;/em> [c. 376-444], and &lt;em>Theodoret&lt;/em> [c. 393-458/446] as having expressed the same opinion.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Lowth, Scott, Adam Clarke,&lt;/em> and &lt;em>Henderson&lt;/em> take the same view. But the sequel of this chapter may be better explained by the events which followed the attacks of the Greco-Syrian kings on Jerusalem (see 2 Maccabees 4) than by the events which followed the ruin of that city by the Romans.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[Benjamin] &lt;em>Blayney&lt;/em> &lt;strong>[3]&lt;/strong> [1721-1801] viewed the contents of this chapter, and much of what is found in the preceding chapters, as yet unfulfilled: and so does &lt;em>Newcome&lt;/em> in part. [Matthew] &lt;em>Henry&lt;/em> is doubtful whether this chapter and the preceding are to be understood of the whole period from the Prophet’s days to the days of the Messiah, or to some events during that time, or to Christ’s coming and the setting up of his kingdom upon the ruins of the Jewish polity.&lt;strong>[4]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Martin Luther wrote two commentaries on Zechariah, the first in Latin and the second in German. The Latin edition stopped at Zechariah 13:7-9. Later, he wrote an expanded German edition. When he gets to Zechariah 14, he wrote, “In this chapter, I give up, for I am not sure what the prophet is talking about.”&lt;strong>[5]&lt;/strong> Luther’s not alone.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Jonathan Menn argues that “the Olivet Discourse is a ‘retelling’ of Zechariah 14. The idea that Jesus was alluding to or ‘retelling’ Zechariah 14 is reinforced by his references to ‘fleeing’ [Matt. 24:16; Mark 13:14; Luke 21:21; compare Zech. 14:5], the sun and the moon being darkened [Matt. 24:29; Mark 13:24; Luke 21:25; compare Zech. 14:6], and his coming with ‘&lt;em>all the angels with Him&lt;/em>’ [Matt. 25:31; compare Zech. 14:5b].”&lt;strong>[6]&lt;/strong> If this is true, and since the Olivet Discourse described what would happen to that present generation (Matt. 24:34), then Zechariah 14 is a fulfilled prophecy.&lt;strong>[7]&lt;/strong> When Rome turned its military forces against the Jews from AD 66-73 in what Josephus described as “The Wars of the Jews,” would any Jew who was familiar with Jesus’ comments from the Mount of Olives have concluded that He was describing a different tribulation from the one they were experiencing (Matt. 24:21; Rev. 1:9) that would have included another rebuilt temple?&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/z14fr_large.png?v=1776945869" alt="Making Prophetic Sense of Zechariah 14">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Making Prophetic Sense of Zechariah 14&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>There was a first audience to receive what was revealed to Zechariah, and much interpretive difficulty arises from failing to understand Scripture as the original readers would have. Can you imagine someone saying, “This is not for us; we can rest easy. It’s really meant for a single generation thousands of years in the future”? The better approach is to investigate the prophecies in terms of their time and place in redemptive history. Zechariah 14 has been interpreted in various ways throughout history. The chapter describes a future “Day of the Lord.” How far in the future is that time, and what events does the final chapter of Zechariah describe?&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/making-prophetic-sense-of-zechariah-14" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Zechariah 14 addresses events leading up to the incarnation of Christ and subsequent events related to His earthly ministry, particularly the final days preceding His crucifixion, death, resurrection, and ascension. Also, there may be some allusions to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. Those who contend that the prophecy was fulfilled in our past are obligated to make their case by appealing to actual historical events, some of which may never have been recorded. Futurists hold a favorable position, as they maintain that the events described in Zechariah remain in the future, even after Christians and other Bible commentators are no longer present to debate the issue.&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>[1] Al Wolters, “Zechariah 14: A Dialogue with the History of Interpretation,” &lt;em>Mid-America Journal of Theology&lt;/em> 13 (2002), 42.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[2] John Calvin, &lt;em>Commentaries on the Twelve Minor Prophets&lt;/em>, 5 vols. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1950), 5:405.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[3] Benjamin Blayney, &lt;em>Zechariah; A New Translation: With Notes, Critical, Philological, and Explanatory&lt;/em>…(Oxford/London: J. Cooke, Cadell, and Davies, 1797): &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/2W9OBzP" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">http://bit.ly/2W9OBzP&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[4] John Calvin, &lt;em>Commentaries on the Twelve Minor Prophets&lt;/em>, 5 vols. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1950), 5:406, note 1.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[5] Hilton C. Oswald, ed., Martin Luther, “Lectures on Zechariah,” &lt;em>Luther’s Works, Lectures on the Minor Prophets III: Zechariah&lt;/em>, trans. Walther H. Miller (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House [1527] 1973), 20:337.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[6] Jonathan Menn, &lt;em>Biblical Eschatology&lt;/em>, 2nd ed. (Eugene, OR: Resource Publications, [2013] 2018), 446.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[7] Gary DeMar, &lt;em>Wars and Rumors of Wars: What Jesus Really Said About the End of the Age, Earthquakes, a Great Tribulation, Signs in the Heavens, and His Coming&lt;/em>, 2nd ed. (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, [2017] 2023).&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Everything is Connected</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/everything-is-connected/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 07:12:17 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/everything-is-connected/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;strong>&lt;a href="https://subsplash.com/u/americanvision/give" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Please help us meet a $15K matching challenge here&lt;/a>&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Gary &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/everything-is-connected" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">discusses&lt;/a> economic policies and ideas that sound good on the surface, but set generations of people up for long-term failures and government dependency.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The professed goal of economic equality has long been used by tyrants as a cover for the most brutal kinds of intervention. It is a fetish, held up before the poor to excite envy, dangled in front of the rich to induce guilt. Revolution and statist oppression are facilitated thereby: the envious will rebel, and the guilty will have been rendered impotent. Ronald Sider does not want the biblical idea of equality before the law—which assumes that there are distinctions among men, and guarantees justice for all, and freedom to fulfill one&amp;rsquo;s calling under God. Sider instead wants a state-enforced egalitarianism, a deliberate, coercive policy of levelling all men to conform to arbitrary, man-made canons of &amp;ldquo;social justice.&amp;rdquo; Equality before the law is incompatible with egalitarianism. The socialist doctrine of economic equality requires the stealing of property and the prohibition of economic freedoms. It ignores the fact that &amp;ldquo;the LORD makes both poor and rich&amp;rdquo; (1 Samuel 2:7), and that if men desire to improve their economic standing they must submit themselves to Him, work hard, and call upon Him for blessing: &amp;ldquo;Humble yourselves, therefore, under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you at the proper time, casting all your care upon Him, for He cares for you.&amp;rdquo; (1 Peter 5:6-7). But the socialist does not humble himself; he envies. He does not work; he steals. Sider&amp;rsquo;s plea for &amp;ldquo;equality&amp;rdquo; is in reality a grasp for power:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>The constantly growing demand for food must stop—or at least slow down dramatically. That means reduced affluence in rich nations and population control everywhere.&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>We have already taken notice of several of his other goals, all to be implemented by the state, and all in the name of equality: &amp;ldquo;Just prices,&amp;rdquo; tariffs, commodity agreements, land &amp;ldquo;reform,&amp;rdquo; nationalization of private industries—and, in a passage quoted already, &amp;ldquo;a new world economic order&amp;rdquo;—in other words, &amp;ldquo;equality&amp;rdquo; imposed by a world government.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/ScreenShot2023-09-25at6.33.22PM_large.png?v=1695681488" alt="Productive Christians: A Biblical Response to Socialist Economics">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Productive Christians: A Biblical Response to Socialist Economics&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>In Productive Christians: A Biblical Response to Socialist Economics, David Chilton exposes the follies and fallacies of socialism, but he also systematically outlines the biblical alternative — an alternative that lays the groundwork for real justice, progress, prosperity, and freedom for the rich, the poor, and everyone in between. First published nearly half a century ago, it is more relevant and more prescient than ever. Chilton’s crystalline prose and take-no-prisoners style is as entertaining as it is informative. This is the way books on economic issues should be written: biblical, understandable, and practical. This new edition also includes a 23-page appendix that Chilton wrote 43 years ago. "Studies in Amos" is an eight-part article series originally released in 1980.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/productive-christians-in-an-age-of-guilt-manipulators" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Gary discusses economic policies and ideas that sound good on the surface, but set generations of people up for long-term failures and government dependency. Socialistic promises sound appealing, but someone (spoiler alert: you, the taxpayer) always has to come up with the money to fund these promises. Taking from one area always affects other areas because our economy is interconnected.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/everything-is-connected" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here to browse all episodes of The Gary DeMar Podcast&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Why Millennial Animal Sacrifices Undermine Christianity</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/why-millennial-animal-sacrifices-undermine-christianity/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 08:02:26 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/why-millennial-animal-sacrifices-undermine-christianity/</guid><description>&lt;p>Joel Richardson posted the following on Facebook: “Why Millennial Sacrifices Do Not Undermine the Cross.” There are several problems with this claim. &lt;em>First&lt;/em>, Revelation 20 does not say Jesus will reign on Earth for the symbolic thousand years, that another temple will be built (I’m losing count), or that animal sacrifices will take place. Everything the premils say about Revelation must be imported from other parts of the Bible, without regard to context. This was an early practice, as I show in chapter 3 of &lt;em>&lt;strong>&lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/new-testament-eschatology-what-the-early-church-believed-about-bible-prophecy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">New Testament Eschatology&lt;/a>&lt;/strong>&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/NTEfr_large.png?v=1712955428" alt="New Testament Eschatology: What the Early Church Believed About Bible Prophecy">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>New Testament Eschatology: What the Early Church Believed About Bible Prophecy&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>It has been maintained by some modern writers that the early church was predominately premillennial and exclusively futuristic on Bible prophecy. While these claims have been made with certainty, there has always been a lack of clear historical documentation to support them. Sometimes the historical record has been stretched and exaggerated to fit an already developed theory. But since the futurist perspective has been promoted as an early church reality by so many for so long, few question it. New Testament Eschatology challenges this prevailing futurist view with a careful study of the historical record. The evidence shows that many early church writers understood the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 to be the end of the Old Covenant world.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/new-testament-eschatology-what-the-early-church-believed-about-bible-prophecy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Second&lt;/em>, there is nothing in Scripture where we are told that animal sacrifices should or could serve as a memorial for the fulfilled redemptive work of Jesus.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Third&lt;/em>, has Joel Richardson read the book of Hebrews? An entire NT book was written to settle any ambiguity about the temporary typological sacrificial system that had passed away.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Some people commented that the temple rites were still operating. This is true. Paul went along with them to gain access to his Jewish audience. “Because of the Jews” (Acts 16:3). Paul had to deal with “the false brethren who had sneaked in to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, in order to bring us into bondage” (Gal. 2:4). It’s worth reading Paul’s entire argument in Galatians 2, including his rebuke of Peter. The dispute with the Judaizers could have been resolved by saying, “You can continue to circumcise and offer sacrifices as memorials.” It would have created what Paul and the rest of the NT writers were trying to avoid, and dispensationalists want to perpetuate. There aren’t two trees: there’s only one (Rom. 11:11-24). There aren’t two men: there’s only one “new man in Christ” (Eph. 2:11-22).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In Tim LaHaye’s &lt;em>Prophecy Study Bible&lt;/em>, we read what dispensationalists claim will take place during the “millennium.” “No foreigner who is uncircumcised in heart and flesh may enter [the temple], neither will any descendants of the Levites conduct services, other than the godly descendants of Zadok.”&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong> There aren’t any descendants of Zadok. And if there were, they would not be needed. Circumcision of the heart was an Old Covenant requirement (Deut. 10:16; 30:6; Jer. 4:4). While circumcision of the heart is still required under the New Covenant (Rom. 2:28-29), physical circumcision is not. Those in Christ, whether Jew or Gentile, are the “true circumcision” (Phil. 3:2-3).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>John C. Whitcomb, Jr., in his article on “The Millennial Temple” in Tim LaHaye’s &lt;em>Prophecy Study Bible&lt;/em>, writes that “five different offerings in Ezekiel (43:13-46:15), four of them with bloodletting, will serve God’s purposes. These offerings are not voluntary but obligatory; God will ‘accept’ people on the basis of these animal sacrifices (43:27), which make reconciliation [atonement] for the house of Israel (45:17, cf. 45:15).”&lt;strong>[2]&lt;/strong> Whitcomb attempts to moderate the problems associated with this unbiblical view by claiming that “the offerings will not take away sin (see Heb. 10:4), but they will be effective in sanctifying Israelites ceremonially because of His infinitely holy presence in their midst.”&lt;strong>[3]&lt;/strong> This is crazy talk!&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This interpretation is impossible for at least three reasons. &lt;em>First&lt;/em>, these sacrifices are said to be “for atonement” (reconciliation) (Ezek. 45:15, 17), not as Whitcomb claimed, “as effective vehicles of divine instruction for Israel and the nations during the Millennial Kingdom.”&lt;strong>[4]&lt;/strong> &lt;em>Second&lt;/em>, Jesus is the once-for-all sacrifice whose blood cleanses us from sin (Heb. 7:26-27; 8:13; 9:11-15; 10:5-22; 1 Peter 3:18). &lt;em>Third&lt;/em>, sanctification comes by “the washing of water with the word” (Eph. 5:26), not by the washing of blood from animal sacrifices.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Jesus paid it all, all to Him I owe;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Sin had left a crimson stain,&lt;/p>
&lt;p>He washed it white as snow.&lt;strong>[5]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Jesus said it Himself, “It is finished” (John 19:30). The debt of sin has been paid—&lt;em>tetelestai&lt;/em>. The covenants made with Noah, Abraham, and David are complete. There’s nothing left to fulfill. Any return to the shadows of the Old Testament darkens the truth that Jesus is “the light of the world” (John 8:12). “Every good thing bestowed and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation, or shifting shadow” (James 1:17). Notice how the apostle Paul calls on God’s people not to let anyone judge them regarding “food and drink, or in respect to a festival or a new moon, or a Sabbath day—things which are only a shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ” (Col. 2:16-17). Those were the “elementary principles of the oracles of God” that the New Testament Christians were told to leave behind (Heb. 6:1).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In the original &lt;em>Scofield Reference Bible&lt;/em> (1909), a note on the nature of these blood sacrifices described in Ezekiel seeks to obscure the problem related to blood sacrifices during the thousand years of Revelation 20 by claiming that “these offerings will be memorial, looking back to the cross, as the offerings under the old covenant were anticipatory, looking forward to the cross.” I wonder why the Judaizers didn’t think of this argument.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/10PMfr_large.png?v=1726012494" alt="Ten Popular Prophecy Myths Exposed and Answered">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Ten Popular Prophecy Myths Exposed and Answered&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Since the reestablishment of Israel in 1948, “end-time” prophetic speculation has been on the rise. While there is a long history of date setting, the past century has seen an exponential increase in the number of books proclaiming that the end is near. It’s time that the “Boy who cried wolf” syndrome be dealt with in a biblical way. Millions of books have been sold proclaiming countless false prophecies. Many Christians are beginning to take a second look at the biblical prophetic record. A seismic shift in biblical eschatology is taking place around the world because Christians, some for the first time, are willing to challenge what they have been taught based on what the Bible actually says.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/ten-popular-prophecy-myths-exposed-and-answered" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>A note in the &lt;em>New Scofield Reference Bible&lt;/em> (1967) acknowledges that “a problem is posed” by the atoning nature of these sacrifices “since the N.T. clearly teaches that animal sacrifices do not in themselves cleanse away sin (Heb. 10:4) and that the one sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ that was made at Calvary completely provides for such expiation (cp. Heb. 9:12, 26, 28; 10:10, 14).” How do the editors solve the problem given their literal hermeneutic? First by suggesting that the blood sacrifices “will be memorial in character,”&lt;strong>[6]&lt;/strong> and second, “the references to sacrifices is [&lt;em>sic&lt;/em>] not to be taken literally.” Ryrie takes a similar position: “If the great festivals of Passover and Tabernacles are to be observed during the Millennium, there is no reason why sacrifices would not also be offered. Then, of course, they will be memorials of the finished sacrifice of Christ.” Where Jesus says, “It is finished” (John 19:30), dispensationalists claim that bloodletting and blood sacrifices will continue for a future thousand years with the slain, resurrected, and glorified Jesus sitting on David’s throne from Jerusalem. With His nail prints and sliced side in plain view, the people will still be sacrificing animals!&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Ezekiel does not say these sacrifices “will be memorials.” The Bible clearly states that they are “for atonement” (Ezek. 45:17, 20). This means that Ezekiel’s visionary temple was either part of the Old Covenant renewal of the sacrificial system that arose during the post-exile restoration period, or the fulfillment that came through the once-for-all redemptive work of Jesus (Luke 24:25-27, 44-45). Jesus is the fulfillment of the temple and sacrificial system. “Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us” (Heb. 9:12). Why would there ever be a need for such memorials when we have the Original is Jesus! Are we to assume that the description of the crucifixion is not enough? Do we need the shadow to memorialize the reality?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>If the sacrifices are “memorial in character,” as Scofield and Ryrie claim, or are “not to be taken literally,” which Whitcomb contends, then such conclusions violate dispensationalism’s insistence that since “fulfilled promises have been fulfilled in a literal way,” then “that leads to the conclusion that all the promises will have a literal fulfillment.”&lt;strong>[7]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>If the millennial sacrifices are a “memorial” looking backward in time, why did the author of Hebrews make such an issue of all the blood sacrifices being done away with in terms of what Jesus did if they could be practiced as a memorial? It makes no sense because the Bible doesn’t even hint at the absurdity of it all. Richardson and those who support his views are reviving the Judaizer heresy.&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>[1] Tim LaHaye, gen. ed., &lt;em>LaHaye Prophecy Study Bible&lt;/em> (LPSB)(Chattanooga, TN: AMG Publishers, 2000), 886, comments on Ezekiel 44:5-15.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[2] John C. Whitcomb, Jr., “The Millennial Temple,” LPSB, 883.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[3] Whitcomb, “The Millennial Temple,” 883.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[4] Whitcomb, “The Millennial Temple,” 883.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[5] “Jesus Paid it All” by Elvina M. Hall (1865).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[6] Charles Feinberg follows the memorial approach when explaining why there will be animal sacrifices during the millennium. “The Church has had for some 1900 years a memorial of that sacrifice of Christ in the Lord’s Supper; Israel as such has had none. [Animal sacrifices] will be that memorial for them primarily.” Jesus stated that “this cup [filled with wine] is the new covenant in My blood” (Luke 22:20; cf. 1 Cor. 11:25). Remembrance of Jesus’ shed blood is done through wine, not the blood of animals. Since Jesus will be physically present, according to premillennialists, won’t the nail marks in His hands and feet and the spear mark in His side be enough to remind people of His redemptive ordeal? The Lord’s Supper was inaugurated with Jews using wine and bread. Feinberg reasons, “If no sacrifices are needed where Christ is present, why were they permitted of God all through the earthly ministry of Christ?” The simple and obvious reason is that Jesus had not yet shed His blood. Feinberg hoped to defend his view by asking this question: “And, thirdly, greater wonder still, why, after He had assuredly perfected our salvation forever on the cross, did God allow those sacrifices to go on until 70 A.D. when the temple was destroyed?” Charles L. Feinberg, &lt;em>Premillennialism or Amillennialism?: The Premillennial and Amillennial Systems of Biblical Interpretation Analyzed and Compared&lt;/em>, 2nd ed. (Wheaton, IL: Van Kampen Press, 1954), 336-337. The fact that God called for the destruction of the temple, which included the sacrificial system, is clear testimony that the sacrificial system was finished when Jesus’ redemptive work ended.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[7] Benware, &lt;em>Understanding End Times Prophecy&lt;/em>, 34.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Economics in the First Century</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/economics-in-the-first-century/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 07:09:12 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/economics-in-the-first-century/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>Gary &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/economics-in-the-first-century-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">continues his interview&lt;/a> with economist Jerry Bowyer. Many details given in the Gospels are extremely important for a proper interpretation of what Jesus said and did and why.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Theologians virtually ignore the economic commentary in the Bible. In the few cases where it gets any attention, economic commentary in the Gospels and other New Testament writings tend to lapse into simplistic class warfare nostrums. Liberation theologians import Marxism wholesale (but they try to sell it retail) into theology. Academic historians of first Century Palestine/Judea have been pushing an account of a poor peasant Jesus leading a poor peasant’s revolt based on the idea of mass displaced workers in Lower Galilee.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Actual archeological findings paint a picture of an industrious and entrepreneurial economy during Jesus’s time there. Reading the Gospels in light of archeology and history, which are now available to us, gives us a very different picture than the one you’ve been told regarding what Jesus taught about work and money.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/maker-takers_large.jpg?v=1648865334" alt="The Maker vs. the Takers">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>The Maker vs. the Takers&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>"This is how biblical theology should be done. Jerry Bowyer mines the New Testament for all kinds of usually overlooked details that help explain the time, traditions, and most importantly, the economics of first century Jerusalem and the surrounding culture to understand the heart of what Jesus was actually teaching." —Gary DeMar&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-maker-vs-the-takers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Gary continues his interview with economist Jerry Bowyer. Many details given in the Gospels are extremely important for a proper interpretation of what Jesus said and did and why. These historical and cultural clues are often overlooked, but they add depth and context to the New Testament that modern readers can and should apply to their reading and preaching of the Gospel.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/economics-in-the-first-century-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here to browse all episodes of The Gary DeMar Podcast&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Episode 88: The Islamic Mahdi, the Antichrist, Gog and Magog</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/episode-88-the-islamic-mahdi-the-antichrist-gog-and-magog/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:09:41 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/episode-88-the-islamic-mahdi-the-antichrist-gog-and-magog/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;strong>Bible Prophecy Under the Microscope-Episode 88&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Gary &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/the-islamic-mahdi-the-antichrist-gog-and-magog" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">discusses&lt;/a> current Facebook speculation about the war in Iran, Islam, and Ezekiel 39-39.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>My library is filled with books that attempt to make the case that the events predicted in Ezekiel 38 and 39 are on our prophetic horizon, and it seems that each month a new book appears insisting that “given the current world situation, nuclear war is inevitable.”&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong> Of course, a nuclear war might indeed take place, but we have to question whether Bible passages like Ezekiel 38­ –39 and Zechariah 12 make such a prediction.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>These and other chapters are used by modern-day prophecy writers to defend the belief that Russia and her Islamic neighbors will attack Israel. It’s argued that this attack will put into motion a series of geo-political events that will set the stage for a coming world leader and an eventual worldwide “great tribulation” that can only be stopped by the direct intervention of God, but only after the Battle of Armageddon when billions of people have died.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This interpretation has a history going back to the eighteenth century but gained near universal acceptance with the publication of the first edition of the &lt;em>Scofield Reference Bible&lt;/em> in 1909. The extended note that Cyrus I. Scofield adds to Ezekiel 38 in the 1917 revised edition identifies Russia as the subject of the two-chapter prophecy. He includes Zechariah 12:1–4 as a parallel passage. So many contemporary prophecy writers follow the script outlined by Scofield and others before him that this interpretation has become a point of prophetic orthodoxy.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>The Gog and Magog End-Time Alliance&lt;/em> will challenge the arguments used by today’s prophecy writers who claim modern-day Russia is the subject of Ezekiel and Zechariah’s prophecies that will set off a chain events leading to the end of our world as we know it.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/gog_front_large.jpg?v=1453287902" alt="The Gog and Magog End-Time Alliance">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>The Gog and Magog End-Time Alliance&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>What if we read Ezekiel 38 and 39 literally? Is it possible that the Gog and Magog alliance that was designed “to destroy, to kill and to annihilate all the Jews, both young and old, women and children” has already taken place? That’s exactly what The Gog and Magog End-Time Alliance attempts to show.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-gog-and-magog-end-time-alliance-israel-russia-and-syria-in-bible-prophecy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Gary discusses current Facebook speculation about the war in Iran, Islam, and Ezekiel 39-39. Once again, the popularizers take world events and cram them into a verse or two in the Bible, completely ignoring both the original context and the audience. They claim to interpret the Bible &amp;ldquo;literally&amp;rdquo; but stop doing so when the biblical facts don&amp;rsquo;t fit their current scenario.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/the-islamic-mahdi-the-antichrist-gog-and-magog" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://americanvision.org/categories/microscope/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for all episodes of Bible Prophecy Under the Microscope&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>[1] Tim LaHaye and Ed Hindson, &lt;em>Global Warning: Are We on the Brink of World War III?&lt;/em> (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 2007), 84.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Borrowed Moral Capital is Holding the World Together (but for how long?)</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/borrowed-moral-capital-is-holding-the-world-together-but-for-how-long/</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 07:13:56 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/borrowed-moral-capital-is-holding-the-world-together-but-for-how-long/</guid><description>&lt;p>The phrase &amp;ldquo;Do you believe in God?&amp;rdquo; is a direct line from Andy Weir&amp;rsquo;s novel &lt;em>Project Hail Mary&lt;/em>, where the character Ryland Grace asks his colleague Steve if he believes in God. In the 2026 film adaptation, this question is reimagined as a conversation between Ryland Grace (Ryan Gosling) and project leader Eva Stratt (Sandra Hüller).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Stratt responds to Grace’s inquiry about her faith with the line, “It’s better than the alternative” (or “It beats the alternative”), acknowledging that belief in God offers hope when scientific odds are overwhelmingly against them. Well, it’s more than that. (If you watch the film in a movie theater, stay for the closing credits and listen to the &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUuCQv5EJhM" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Ike and Tina Turner song, “Glory, Glory.”&lt;/a>)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Richard Dawkins, a prominent high priest of the religion of atheism, has declared that he’s a “cultural Christian.” Of course, he is. He has no other choice. So is every atheist who doesn’t consistently follow through with his or her atheistic assumptions. If I could sit down with Mr. Dawkins, I would press him to be logically consistent with his materialistic, atheistic, and evolutionary assumptions. I would have him consider Canada’s Psycho Killer or watch this short video titled “&lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x__pGaIXKic" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Cruel Logic&lt;/a>.”&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Luka Rocco Magnotta (born Eric Clinton Newman) was accused of killing and dismembering 33-year-old Lin Juna, a male Chinese student. Magnotta carved up Juna’s body, sexually abused the corpse, and filmed and posted the horror online.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Days after the killing, Montreal police discovered the victim’s torso in a suitcase by the trash outside an apartment along a busy highway.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>His severed hands and feet were sent through the mail to federal political parties in Ottawa and to two schools in Vancouver. The head was found in a Montreal park months later.&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>The ten-minute video shows Juna “being stabbed in a frenzy with an ICE-PICK, before being dismembered, sexually abused and his flesh EATEN with a knife and fork.”&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In a letter to &lt;em>The Sun&lt;/em>, Magnotta wrote that “Once you kill, and taste blood, it’s impossible to stop.” Is this a remnant of an evolutionary survival mechanism that has been repressed because of what Richard Dawkins calls “culture Christianity”? Kind of like domesticated pigs that escaped their pens, live and breed in the wild, and go feral. &lt;em>The Lord of the Flies&lt;/em> comes to mind.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In an atheistic, materialistic, mud-to-man evolutionary process, did Magnotta do anything that could be considered morally wrong? If he did, what is the basis of the standard that Juna himself could have used as he was being “sliced and diced”? Who says that ice-picking someone to death and eating the carcass is fundamentally evil? Who gets to say that this or that behavior is good or bad? By what standard are such judgments made?&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/neighfr_large.png?v=1695172157" alt="Why It Might be OK to Eat Your Neighbor">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Why It Might be OK to Eat Your Neighbor&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Love your neighbor, or Eat your neighbor? It’s been said that you can’t get blood out of a stone. Similarly, no matter how atheists try, they can’t account for moral standards that must be obeyed when there is no accounting for good or evil. The most damning assessment of a matter-only cosmos devoid of a Creator is that we got to this place in our evolutionary history by acts of violence whereby the strong conquered the weak with no one to support or condemn them.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/why-it-might-be-ok-to-eat-your-neighbor-book" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>The standard can’t be for something called the “social good” since defining what’s good for society doesn’t have an unimpeachable moral foundation, given the origins of what we call life today. If the evolutionary theory of origins is true, there was no morality when the first sign of life emerged from the biotic soup. It was a molecule-eat-molecule beginning to the survival of the fittest.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>If the first life form had the equivalent of an ice pick, it could have used it, and there was no law in the cosmos that would have said, “Thou shalt not icepick to death your fellow life-form molecule.” An evolutionist might argue that it was good for more highly evolved life forms to develop a moral code for the good of society. “Mutual cooperation is the necessary outgrowth of evolution,” the Darwinists tell us. Says who and by what impeachable standard? Maybe our arbitrary moral laws are holding back greater evolutionary development.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Let’s get back to Richard Dawkins, who described himself as a “cultural Christian” in an interview he gave before delivering a speech at Charleston College in South Carolina on March 9, 2013.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>“I guess I’m a cultural Christian,” he said. He compared his cultural Christianity to people who “call themselves Jews, including Herb Silverman. He’s a Jewish atheist. He identifies with Jewish culture, believes he’s a part of the Jewish tradition, and that’s valuable.” This answers nothing. What about someone who identifies with a culture that, at one time, identified with cannibalism and human sacrifice?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The Aztecs had raided neighboring tribes for years, capturing thousands of victims for human sacrifice. Cortez and his men were horrified at what they saw. Aztec temples were stacked with human skulls. When Cortez spotted a sacrificial pyramid, he made his way up the hundred and fourteen steps with some of his best soldiers following close behind. Montezuma was at the top waiting for him. What Cortez and his battle-hardened men saw shocked them. Montezuma had just sacrificed some boys, and blood was everywhere.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Bernal Diaz, an eyewitness, describes the scene: “All the walls &amp;hellip; were so splashed and encrusted with blood that they were black, the floor was the same and the whole place stank vilely&amp;hellip;. The walls were so clotted with blood and the soil so bathed with it that in the slaughterhouses of Spain there is not such another stench.”&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>As the Spaniards climbed down the temple pyramid and made their way through the city, they saw more unspeakable horrors. They passed rooms where the bodies of sacrificial victims were being prepared for feasts. They saw racks that held more than a hundred thousand human skulls. Aztec society was built on blood, the blood of thousands of helpless victims.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>It was their tradition and culture. Who was to say it was wrong?&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/NOS-fr_large.png?v=1674137941" alt="No Other Standard">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>No Other Standard&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>No Other Standard is Dr. Bahnsen’s response to various books, articles, and other critiques that have circulated over the years. Bahnsen skillfully takes his critics’ arguments apart, showing that they have either misrepresented his position or misrepresented the Bible. Line by line, point by point, he shows that they have not understood his arguments and have also not understood the vulnerability of their own logical and theological positions. Joe Louis once said of an ill-fated scheduled opponent in the ring, “He can run, but he can’t hide.” Likewise, Bahnsen’s critics. No Other Standard corners them all, and one by one, floors them.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/no-other-standard-theonomy-and-its-critics" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Montezuma, following Dawkins’ “cultural Christian” and Silverman’s “cultural Jew” traditions, should have said to Cortez. “I’m a cultural Aztec. You can’t rightly judge my cultural traditions and customs by these arbitrary foreign traditions. In fact, there is no such thing as a cosmic judge of anything.”&lt;/p>
&lt;p>What could a consistent atheist say to the Aztecs? There were no “cultural Christians” among them. It took an outside moral worldview to put an end to it.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Jackson, Dawkins, Silverman, and nearly every atheist who claims justification for a moral worldview must borrow morality from Christianity because there is no way to account for morality in a materialistic world. Darwin wrote about a “moral sense” among animals, but he lived in a world shaped by a distinctly biblical moral culture. He was projecting that moral culture onto evolved biological units that were killing and eating for survival.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>While channel surfing many years ago, I came across the second installment of the six-part series “The Trials of Life.” I soon learned what Benjamin Franklin meant when he described the eagle as a bird of “bad moral character.” With two eaglets in the nest and not enough food to go around, the mother eagle allows the weakest eaglet to die. She then cannibalizes the dead eaglet and feeds it to the survivor. Was this natural or unnatural? Is this moral animal behavior that we should emulate? How do we know? Should we follow the example of the eagles or something else?&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>[1] Quoted in Albert Marrin, &lt;em>Aztecs and Spaniards: Cortes and the Conquest of Mexico&lt;/em> (New York: Atheneum, 1986), 111.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The Maker vs. the Takers</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/the-maker-vs-the-takers/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 07:38:51 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/the-maker-vs-the-takers/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>In this &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/the-maker-vs-the-takers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">first part&lt;/a> of an interview with author Jerry Bowyer, Gary discusses the economic and cultural arena of the first century.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Jesus’s confrontation with the rich young ruler is probably the most cited episode in the Gospels on the topic of wealth. Unfortunately, it is often cited by people who want to use it as a cudgel in their own ideological war against the market economy and in favor of centralizing more power in the state.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>As I mentioned in the introduction to this book, years ago when I hosted a daily radio program, a leftist listener called my show and tried to use this passage from the Gospels to attack me for my free-market views. She quoted (actually misquoted) that passage as saying, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to go to heaven.” That is a common misquote. The passage doesn’t say anything about going to heaven. It mentions entering the kingdom of heaven, which is a different matter.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But aside from that quibble, the use of that passage as an ideological weapon in the leftist cause is a serious misreading of the passage. Jesus offered that statement as a commentary on a confrontation He had with a man of the state, a rich young ruler. Right off the bat, it seems quite unlikely Jesus intended His words to be used to grow the power of the state when the man He had just confronted lived off his access to the power of the state.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/maker-takers_large.jpg?v=1648865334" alt="The Maker vs. the Takers">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>The Maker vs. the Takers&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Theologians virtually ignore the economic commentary in the Bible. In the few cases where it gets any attention, economic commentary in the Gospels and other New Testament writings tend to lapse into simplistic class warfare nostrums. Liberation theologians import Marxism wholesale (but they try to sell it retail) into theology. Reading the Gospels in light of archeology and history, which are now available to us, gives us a very different picture than the one you’ve been told regarding what Jesus taught about work and money.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-maker-vs-the-takers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>In this first part of an interview with author Jerry Bowyer, Gary discusses the economic and cultural arena of the first century. The Bible cannot be interpreted properly without a clear understanding of the times and customs of the people and places described in the text. As an example, Jerry helps add clarity to Jesus&amp;rsquo; words to the rich young ruler.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/the-maker-vs-the-takers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://americanvision.org/24515/the-maker-versus-the-takers-what-jesus-really-said-about-social-justice-and-economics/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Read Gary&amp;rsquo;s article about Jerry&amp;rsquo;s book&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here to browse all episodes of The Gary DeMar Podcast&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Has Christianity become “Socially irrelevant, even if privately engaging”?</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/has-christianity-become-socially-irrelevant-even-if-privately-engaging/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:22:33 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/has-christianity-become-socially-irrelevant-even-if-privately-engaging/</guid><description>&lt;p>Thomas Jefferson, serving as the ambassador to France, and John Adams, ambassador to Britain, met in London with Sidi Haji Abdrahaman, the Dey of Tripoli’s ambassador to Britain, attempting to negotiate a peace treaty with the Islamic world of their time. Jefferson and Adams argued in vain that the United States was not at war with Islam. The following is from a March 28, 1786, letter addressed to John Jay, Secretary of Foreign Affairs for the Continental Congress, and signed by Adams and Jefferson. It concerned their conversation with the Tripoli ambassador:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the ground of their pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury, and observed that we considered all mankind our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman [archaic word for Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Unless a nation submits to Islam—whether that nation is an aggressor or not—that nation is at war with Islam. Islam’s goal is to conquer the world, either by the submission of one’s will or by Allah’s sword.&lt;strong>[2]&lt;/strong> Islamists are in it for the win. “Responding to France’s ban on the Islamic veil,” in 2004, “the [then] new head of the Muslim Brotherhood asserted Islam ultimately will triumph over the United States and Europe ‘I have complete faith that Islam will invade Europe and America, because Islam has logic and a mission,’ said Muhammad Mahdi Othman….”&lt;strong>[3]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>When President Jefferson refused to increase the tribute demanded by the Islamists, Tripoli declared war on the United States. A United States Navy squadron, under Commander Edward Preble, blockaded Tripoli from 1803 to 1805. After rebel soldiers from Tripoli, led by United States Marines, captured the city of Derna, the Pasha of Tripoli signed a treaty promising to exact no more tribute.&lt;strong>[4]&lt;/strong> See chapter 11 of my book &lt;em>&lt;strong>The Case for America’s Christian Heritage&lt;/strong>&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/cachfr_large.png?v=1675169569" alt="The Case for America’s Christian Heritage">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>The Case for America’s Christian Heritage&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>It’s not enough to relive history. There’s much work before us to reset the foundation stones of a firm reliance on Divine Providence. We need to heed the words of Benjamin Franklin who quoted Psalm 127:1 during the drafting process of the Constitution: “except the Lord build the house they labor in vain that build it,” and “that without His concurring aid we shall succeed in this political building no better, than the Builders of Babel.” The principles that were true and necessary centuries ago for building nations are equally true and necessary today.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/case-for-americas-christian-heritage" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>As expected, there are many Christians today who believe that the rise of Islamic persecution of Christians is a sign that we are living in the last days. What’s happening to Christians around the world at the hands of Islamists is horrific, but it’s not new. There’s a history of Islamic persecution of Christians that goes back centuries. Philip Jenkins presents us with a brief look into the war that Islam has had with Christians:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Through the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the Turks dominated most of the south-eastern quadrant of Europe, and in 1683, they came very close to capturing Vienna, the capital of the HolyRoman Empire. As Hilaire Belloc noted, “Less than 100 years before the American War of Independence, a Mohammedan army was threatening to overrun and destroy Christian civilization, and would have done so if the catholic King of Poland had not destroyed the army outside of Vienna.”&lt;strong>[5]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Thousands of Christians were enslaved. Muslims occupied “the role of aggressors and slave-masters. Balkan Christian populations remained under heavy-handed Turkish oppression until modern times, suffering a brutal occupation that can legitimately be compared to later European experiences under the Nazis and Communists.”&lt;strong>[6]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/godandgovt_large.png?v=1608039906" alt="God and Government">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>God and Government&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>With a fresh new look, more images, an extensive subject and scripture index, and an updated bibliography, God and Government is ready to prepare a whole new generation to take on the political and religious battles confronting Christians today. May it be used in a new awakening of Christians in America—not just to inform minds, but to stimulate action and secure a better tomorrow for our posterity.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/god-and-government" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>This very brief history should dispel any notion that our fight with Islamic extremism is something new and a sign of the last days. It’s not. In fact, the fight with Islam goes back nearly 1500 years, and throughout that history, prophecy writers have viewed Islam in its many incarnations as a prophetic end-time villain signaling the near return of Jesus in one of the five “rapture” positions &lt;strong>[7]&lt;/strong> or in the Second Coming itself.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>There is no doubt that Islam has designs on conquering the world. What’s held it at bay for many centuries is a fully robust Christianity that has advanced civilization. When Christianity is embraced as the “light of the world,” secularism and religious cults like Islam fade in the bright light of a full-orbed Christian worldview. When Christians retreat from theworld, evil can migrate into areas where it was once dispelled (Matt. 12:22-29). Over time, Christianity ceased to be a comprehensive, world-changing religion. “[W]here religion still survives in the modern world, no matter how passionate or ‘committed’ the individual may be, it amounts to little more than a private preference, a spare-time hobby, a leisure pursuit.”&lt;strong>[8]&lt;/strong> Theodore Roszak used an apt phrase to describe much of modern-day Christendom: “Socially irrelevant, even if privately engaging.”&lt;strong>[9]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The advance of Islam in our day has taken place because of Christianity’s privatized religion and the advance of secularism. Religion, like nature, abhors a vacuum. G.K. Chesterton observed that when people cease to believe in God, they do not end up believing in nothing; they end up believing in anything, no matter how absurd.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The danger for Christians today is that they are being told, and many are believing, that the reemergence of aggressiveIslam is a sign of the end. Rather, Christians should see Islam and anti-Christianism as indicators that Christianity has adopted a false gospel of dualism and escapism. When the world seems to be on the brink of destruction, prophecy books fly off the presses faster than people can read them, assuring the people of God that this time the end really is near.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>A few years ago, I received a letter from someone who claimed that it is impossible to transform society in any meaningful way since “the world is being run by Satan.” Like many Christians today, the letter writer is a believer in an end-time scenario that demands the return of Jesus in our generation to take us out of this world. Until that happens, don’t look for, and don’t expect, to be successful at any type of long-term societal transformation. While she agrees“that each of us can make a contribution to the quality of life on this planet, we will never ‘transform society.’ If we could, God wouldn’t have said that He would have to do it. He’s sending His Son to vanquish the wicked.”&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In the meantime, like so many who are caught up in this type of “prophetic inevitability” thinking, there’s not much Christians can or should do. Too many Christians are caught between “This World Is Not My Home” and “This Is My Father’s World.” Which is it? It’s the latter. That’s why we are taught to pray that God’s will be done “on Earth as it is in heaven” (Matt. 5:10). Since all authority in heaven and Earth has been given to Jesus (Matt. 28:18-20), how can Satan be running this world? Satan is a single creature with limited power.&lt;strong>[10]&lt;/strong> The problem isn’t Satan; it’s us (James 1:13-16). Satan was described to the Corinthians as the “god of this age” (2 Cor. 4:4). Older translations translated the Greek word &lt;em>aion&lt;/em> as “world.” The more accurate translation is “age.” Satan was and is no more a god than a person’s belly is a god (Phil 3:19). Satan was and is no more a god than Herod was a god (Acts 12:21-24).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Many people don’t realize that Christianity gave rise to the best in art, science, music, literature, education, economic theory, publishing, and much of the Western world’s legal system. For the most part, Christians were not dualists. They believed God is sovereign over everything, including this world. This truth helps explain, for example, why “real science arose only once: in Europe. In contrast with the dominant religious and philosophical doctrines in the non-Christian world, Christians developed science because they believed it could be done, and should be done.”&lt;strong>[11]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The following example of “prophetic inevitability” thinking is extreme, but even more moderate examples end up having an impact on Christians and how they view this world and what can be accomplished this side of heaven:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>“Do you realize if we start feeding hungry people things won’t get worse, and if things don’t get worse, Jesus won’t come?” interrupted a coed during a Futures Inter-term I recently conducted at a northwest Christian college. Her tone of voice and her serious expression revealed she was utterly sincere. And unfortunately I have discovered the coed’s question doesn’t reflect an isolated viewpoint. Rather, it betrays a wide-spread misunderstanding of biblical eschatology . . . that seems to permeate much contemporary Christian consciousness. I believe this misunderstanding of God’s intentions for the human future is seriously undermining the effectiveness of the people of God in carrying out his mission in a world of need . . . The response of the (student) . . . reflects what I call the Great Escape View of the future. So much of the popular prophetic literature has focused our attention morbidly on the dire, the dreadful, and the destruction of all that is.&lt;strong>[12]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>As radical as this example is, this type of thinking prevails more than one would think. Jan Markell is a believer in an end-time scenario that demands the return of Jesus in our generation to rescue us from inevitable doom. Until that happens, do not look for or expect to be successful at any type of long-term societal transformation. In fact, to participate in this type of work, Markell tells her audience, is “delusional” and will keep “people out of heaven.” It’s like rearranging the deck chairs as it sank. Get in the lifeboat and wait to be rescued! The secularists and Islamists are not heading for lifeboats. We are most fortunate that there were enough people centuries ago who were not hoodwinked by an eschatological claim like hers. What would Christians who follow Markell’s end-time worldview be saying and doing today if they were faced with calls to abolish the slave trade and build long-lasting, productive cultures?&lt;strong>[13]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>[1] &lt;em>The Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States of America from the Signing of the Definitive Treaty of Peace&lt;/em>, 10th September 1783, to the Adoption of the Constitution, March 4, 1789, 3 vols. (City of Washington: Blair and Rives, 1837) 1:604-605&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[2] Robert Spencer, &lt;em>The Truth about Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion&lt;/em> (Washington, D.C.: Regnery, 2006) and Robert Spencer, &lt;em>The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)&lt;/em> (Washington, D.C.: Regnery, 2005).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[3] “‘Islam will Invade Europe and America,’” &lt;em>WND&lt;/em> (February 4. 2004): &lt;a href="https://www.wnd.com/2004/02/23076/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">https://www.wnd.com/2004/02/23076/&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[4] Brian Kilmeade and Don Yeager, &lt;em>Thomas Jefferson and the Tripoli Pirates: The Forgotten War that Changed American History&lt;/em> (New York: Sentinel/Penguin Random House, 2015).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[5] Philip Jenkins, &lt;em>God’s Continent: Christianity, Islam, and Europe’s Religious Crisis&lt;/em> (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 106.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[6] Jenkins, &lt;em>God’s Continent&lt;/em>, 106.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[7] The five “rapture” positions are defined in terms of when Jesus returns to take the church off Earth in relation to a future seven-year “great tribulation” period that supposedly is the final week in Daniel’s “seventy weeks” (Dan. 9:24-27): before (pre), in the middle (mid), partially, just before God pours out His wrath on unbelievers (pre-wrath), or after (post),&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[8] Os Guinness, &lt;em>The Gravedigger File: Papers on the Subversion of the Modern Church&lt;/em> (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1983), 72.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[9] Theodore Roszak, &lt;em>Where the Wasteland Ends&lt;/em> (New York: Doubleday, 1973), 449.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[10] Jay E. Adams, &lt;em>The Christian Counselor’s Manual&lt;/em> (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1973), 126-127.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[11] Rodney Stark, &lt;em>The Victory of Reason: How Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and Western Success&lt;/em> (New York: Random House, 2005), 14.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[12] Tom Sine, &lt;em>The Mustard Seed Conspiracy: You Can Make a Difference in Tomorrow’s Troubled World&lt;/em> (Waco, TX: Word, 1981), 69.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[13] Rodney Stark, &lt;em>For the Glory of God: How Monotheism Led to Reformations, Science, Witch-Hunts, and the End of Slavery&lt;/em> (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003) and Vishal Mangalwadi, &lt;em>The Book that Made Your World: How the Bible Created the Soul of Western Civilization&lt;/em> (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2011).&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Comparing Popular End-Time Beliefs to Scripture</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/comparing-popular-end-time-beliefs-to-scripture/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 06:52:23 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/comparing-popular-end-time-beliefs-to-scripture/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>In this &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/comparing-popular-end-time-beliefs-to-scripture" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">third and final part&lt;/a> of his interview with Canadian television program, Thrive, Gary points out several aspects of how most modern prophetic teaching doesn&amp;rsquo;t fit with what the Bible actually says.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In Matthew’s gospel we read about “those days which were before the flood” and “the day that Noah entered the ark” (Matt. 24:38). Similarly, there were days before the coming of the Son of Man who prophesied judgment on the temple and city of Jerusalem and the day of the coming of the Son of Man. The same people were involved in both the “days before” and “the day of” the Son of Man. Those who “were eating and drinking” and “marrying and giving in marriage” were the same people who were shut out on “the day that Noah entered the ark.” They were all a part of Noah’s generation.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Noah entered the ark on a single day similar to the way Jesus as the Son of Man came on the “clouds of heaven with power and great glory” (Matt. 24:30), a day and hour known only to the Father (24:36). “Some shall be rescued from the destruction of Jerusalem, like Lot out of the burning of Sodom: while others, no ways perhaps different in outward circumstances, shall be left to perish in it.”&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Jesus said His coming “will be just like the days of Noah” (24:37). The people were doing normal things—“eating and drinking” and “marrying and giving in marriage.” Jesus told His audience that life would be going on as usual when He returns in judgment against the temple and city of Jerusalem. Jesus did not describe evil behavior like drunkenness and sexual sins like “‘exchanging mates’ or ‘wife swapping,’” contrary to what prophecy writers like M. R. DeHaan and Jack Van Impe claim.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/pwfr_large.png?v=1736370066" alt="Prophecy Wars: The Biblical Battle Over the End Times">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Prophecy Wars: The Biblical Battle Over the End Times&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>If you’re willing to take the Bible at its word, the study of prophecy can strengthen your faith, but if your trust is in man’s speculations, you will be disappointed every time. And that is why Bible prophecy is such a crucial area for apologetics. Skeptics of all stripes have condemned the Bible as inaccurate merely because various well-meaning Christians have been in error about the End Times.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/prophecy-wars-the-biblical-battle-over-the-end-times" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>In this third and final part of his interview with Canadian television program, &lt;em>Thrive&lt;/em>, Gary points out several aspects of how most modern prophetic teaching doesn&amp;rsquo;t fit with what the Bible actually says. He discusses a few verses that created questions for him when he was a new Christian and caused him to study the issue much more closely.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/comparing-popular-end-time-beliefs-to-scripture" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qF3tBHUpMoc&amp;amp;t=2s" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Watch the video interview here&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here to browse all episodes of The Gary DeMar Podcast&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>[1] Thomas Newton, &lt;em>Dissertations on the Prophecies, Which Have Remarkably Been Fulfilled, and at This Time are Fulfilling in the World&lt;/em> (London: J.F. Dove, 1754), 379.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Episode 87: A Response to John Bevere's 'The King is Coming'</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/episode-87-a-response-to-john-beveres-the-king-is-coming/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 07:30:24 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/episode-87-a-response-to-john-beveres-the-king-is-coming/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;strong>Bible Prophecy Under the Microscope-Episode 87&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Gary &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/a-response-to-john-beveres-the-king-is-coming" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">responds&lt;/a> to a recent bestselling book by author John Bevere called &amp;ldquo;The King is Coming.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>What Jesus declared on the Mount of Olives and what Matthew records for us was a prophecy about the future of Israel’s then-living generation. Jesus spoke to His present audience around AD 33, and the temple was destroyed in AD 70. The destruction of the temple &lt;strong>was&lt;/strong> future, but only a future that was a generation in length! It’s surprising that Donald Green, a critic of a first-century fulfillment of Matthew 24, could write the following: “A reader previously unacquainted with preterist writings will no doubt wonder how they could claim past fulfillment of the Olivet Discourse, when so much of its language seems to refer to the future.”&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The entire [Olivet Discourse] prophecy was about the future, &lt;em>a future that was in the generational sights of that first-century generation and is now fulfilled!&lt;/em> Green makes several unsubstantiated charges. I found this one to be the most outrageous: “when the ordinary sense of a passage in that section of the Olivet Discourse seems future, the preterist understands it to be using figurative language to refer to a now-past event.” This is absurd. The entire discourse was about the future when Jesus answered His disciples regarding their questions about the destruction of the temple and the end of the age (Matt. 24:2-3). There is nothing figurative about earthquakes, wars and rumors of wars, famines, false prophets, false christs, a great tribulation, and fleeing to literal mountains in literal Judea. Green has almost nothing to say about how preterists take a non-figurative interpretive approach to all these prophetic elements in the many books and articles that have been written on the subject over the centuries. The reason preterists take a non-figurative approach is because the Bible does. When a symbolic or “figurative” approach is followed in particular passages, it’s because the Bible follows such an approach. The Bible is the best interpreter of itself.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/WRWfr_large.png?v=1678474893" alt="Wars and Rumors of Wars">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Wars and Rumors of Wars&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>A first-century interpretation of the Olivet Discourse was once common in commentaries and narrative-style books that describe the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70. There is also a history of skeptics who turn to Bible prophecy and claim Jesus was wrong about the timing of His coming at “the end of the age” and the signs associated with it. A mountain of scholarship shows that the prophecy given by Jesus was fulfilled in exacting detail when He said it would: before the generation of those to whom He was speaking passed away.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/wars-and-rumors-of-wars" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Gary responds to a recent bestselling book by author John Bevere called &amp;ldquo;The King is Coming.&amp;rdquo; While he makes several good points in his book, Bevere also falls for the &amp;ldquo;chicken little theology&amp;rdquo; that claims the sky is falling and Jesus is coming &amp;ldquo;any day now.&amp;rdquo; Gary clears the confusion by pointing to what the Bible itself actually says.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/a-response-to-john-beveres-the-king-is-coming" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://americanvision.org/categories/microscope/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for all episodes of Bible Prophecy Under the Microscope&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The Dried-Up Euphrates as a Sign the Rapture is Near</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/the-dried-up-euphrates-as-a-sign-the-rapture-is-near/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 07:52:23 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/the-dried-up-euphrates-as-a-sign-the-rapture-is-near/</guid><description>&lt;p>It’s being argued that the dried-up Euphrates is the marching route of a 200-million-man army from China on horseback (Rev. 9:13-21). The drying up of the Euphrates takes place after “the stars fell from heaven to the earth, as a fig tree casts its unripe figs … [a]nd the sky was split apart like a scroll when it is rolled up; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places” (Rev. 6:13-14). Every horse and everything else would have been killed! When we get to Revelation 12, we see a giant woman, a dragon, and a third of the stars thrown down to Earth (vv. 1, 4). Then there’s Revelation 13, where we’re told we&amp;rsquo;ll be microchipped. If these events are physically going to happen as written, by the time we get to chapter 16, Earth will be a burned-out cinder.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Why would China mount such a vast army after plagues and stellar phenomena had just wiped out a third of the earth’s population? The world would be in such chaos (if it still existed) that the last thing on anyone’s mind would be to round up 200 million horses (that don’t exist), soldiers, weapons, saddles, and enough food and water so they could make an impossible trek from China (16:12) to Israel.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>David Chilton has a helpful discussion of Revelation 16:12 in his commentary &lt;em>The Days of Vengeance&lt;/em>:&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Corresponding to the Sixth Trumpet (9:13-21), the Sixth Chalice is poured out upon the great river, the Euphrates; and its water was dried up, that the way might be prepared for the kings from the rising of the sun. As we saw on 9:14, the Euphrates was Israel’s northern frontier, from which invading armies would come to ravage and oppress the Covenant people. The image of the drying of the Euphrates for a conquering army is taken, in part, from a stratagem of Cyrus the Persian, who conquered Babylon by temporarily turning the Euphrates out of its course, enabling his army to march up the riverbed into the city, taking it by surprise. The more basic idea, of course, is the drying up of the Red Sea (Ex. 14:21-22) and the Jordan River (Josh. 3:9-17; 4:22-24) for the victorious people of God. Again there is the underlying note of tragic irony: Israel has become the new Babylon, an enemy of God that must now be conquered by a new Cyrus, as the true Covenant people are miraculously delivered and brought into their inheritance. As Carrington observes, the coming of the armies from the Euphrates “surely represents nothing but the return of Titus to besiege Jerusalem with further reinforcements”;&lt;strong>[2]&lt;/strong> and it is certainly more than coincidental that thousands of these very troops actually did come from the Euphrates.&lt;strong>[3]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/s-l1600_burned_large.png?v=1557155461" alt="The Days of Vengeance: An Exposition on the Book of Revelation">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>The Days of Vengeance: An Exposition on the Book of Revelation&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>David Chilton's extraordinary verse-by-verse exposition of Revelation is as welcome as a cool drenching rain upon a dry, thirsty ground. From the very beginning, cranks and crackpots have attempted to use Revelation to advocate some new twist on the Chicken Little Doctrine: "The Sky is Falling!" But, as David Chilton shows in this careful, detailed exposition, St. John's Apocalypse teaches instead that Christians will overcome all opposition through the work of Jesus Christ.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-days-of-vengeance" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Kenneth Gentry adds historical details about what was taking place militarily at the time of Israel’s judgment, as described by Jesus in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>What is more, the four angels from the Euphrates probably reflect something of the actual military circumstances involved, which included four Roman legions and also the prominent mention of the Euphrates. When Nero originally declared the war, he sent Vespasian “to take upon him the command of the armies that were in Syria,” where he “gathered together, the Roman forces” (J.W. 3:1:3 §7). The Euphrates River (Rev 9:14) touches Syria, where the Romans normally kept four brigades: “The huge stretch of territory between this end of Syria and the Euphrates was controlled by four brigades” (Tacitus, Ann. 4:5).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Regarding later actions in the Jewish War, Josephus mentions a great body of troops from the Euphrates who become a part of Titus’s forces when he takes over for his father Vespasian: “There followed him also three thousand drawn from those that guarded the river Euphrates” (J.W. 5:1:6 §44; cp. 7:1:3 §17). Thus, “at the siege of Jerusalem four legions were involved (the Fifth, Tenth, Fifteenth and Twelfth)”…. Josephus expressly mentions these four legions: “The [siege] works that belonged to the four legions were erected on the west side of the city” (J.W. 6:8:1 §376; cp. Tacitus, Hist.5:1:6 §41-42). According to Josephus (J.W. 5:1:6 §40–44).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>*****&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Not only is the Euphrates Israel’s ideal northern border, but it is also the extent of the power of Israel’s two most powerful kings, David (2Sa 8:3; 1Ch 18:3) and Solomon (2Ch 9:26). As the northern most boundary of Israel, as Beale notes (506), the Euphrates can serve as an apocalyptic image of God’s threatened judgment upon his covenant people by means of invading forces (Isa 7:20; 8:7-8; 27:12; Jer 1:14-15; 6:1, 22; 10:22; 13:20; Eze 38:6, 15; 39:2; Joel 2:20-25). This is because historically “from the River Euphrates had come Sennacherib and Nebuchadnezzar, destroyers of Samaria and Jerusalem; by now the Euphrates has become a mere symbol for the quarter from which judgment is to come on Jerusalem” (Carrington 165).&lt;strong>[4]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Some additional interpretive factors to consider. &lt;em>First&lt;/em>, Revelation was written about events that were “shortly” to “take place” (1:1) because “the time is near” (1:3; 22:10). Near for Revelation’s first readers, who made up the seven churches in Asia Minor (Rev. 2-3).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Second&lt;/em>, there are hundreds of references to the Old Testament found in Revelation that are mostly used as symbols by taking their characteristics and character and applying them principally to the near events of John’s day: Jezebel (2:20), Sodom and Egypt (11:8), Babylon (17-18), Gog and Magog (20:7-9). Jerusalem, “the great city” where Jesus was crucified, is “mystically … called Sodom and Egypt” for typological reasons. Jerusalem is also described as “Babylon.” Jerusalem had taken on the characteristics of these Old Testament cities. We find something similar in Matthew 24:29, where Jesus applies the events of their generation (v. 34) to Babylon and other Old Testament nations under judgment (Isa. 13:10; 24:23; Ezek. 32:7; Amos 5:20). This is true of many allusions to the Old Testament found in the book of Revelation, and that would include the Euphrates River. Notice how stars are thrown down to the earth in Revelation (6:12; 8:12; 12:9). If these were actual stars, the earth would have been vaporized several times.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/lbfront_large.png?v=1683813853" alt="Left Behind: Separating Fact from Fiction">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Left Behind: Separating Fact from Fiction&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>In Left Behind: Separating Fact From Fiction, Gary DeMar takes a critical look at the theology behind this popular fiction series and challenges readers to consider a different interpretation. With confidence based on years of biblical study, DeMar carefully examines eleven major components of the pre-tribulation rapture theology and offers clear, convincing alternatives to the interpretations of Bible prophecy presented in Left Behind.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/left-behind-separating-fact-from-fiction" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Third&lt;/em>, if you believe in a pre-tribulational rapture, then nothing this side of the “rapture” has any prophetic significance. According to the pre-trib view, &lt;a href="https://americanvision.org/posts/the-rapture-is-being-used-to-boost-book-sales/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">the so-called “rapture”&lt;/a> could have happened at any time in the past 2000 years, whether the Euphrates was wet or dry.&lt;strong>[5]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Fourth&lt;/em>, numerous dams have been constructed along the Euphrates, affecting its flow. An increase in irrigation water use is also a contributing factor.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Abdul Razzaq al-Aliawi, an engineer and former director of Syria’s maintenance department for the Euphrates River, told Al-Monitor, “The Euphrates River bed witnessed six historical eras, including the Sumerian, Akkadian, Assyrian, Greek, Byzantine, in addition to the Islamic era.” Building dams in the first place, he said, was “an unjust decision” [because of the cemeteries that were there].&lt;strong>[6]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Fifth&lt;/em>, “The drop of the Euphrates and Tigris waters during the past three years [since 2020] has uncovered many archaeological sites that were submerged in the waters of the two rivers that cross through Syria, Iraq and Turkey.”&lt;strong>[7]&lt;/strong> The discovery of these sites shows that the Euphrates’ flow has changed in the modern era due to dam projects. “Recent news articles have reported that the Euphrates River is indeed drying up. According to a study by the University of Arizona, the river’s flow has decreased by more than 60% over the past century due to dams and irrigation projects in Turkey, Syria, and Iraq.”&lt;strong>[8]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>[1] David Chilton, &lt;em>&lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-days-of-vengeance" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">The Days of Vengeance: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation&lt;/a>&lt;/em> (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, 1987), 407-408.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[2] Philip Carrington, &lt;em>The Meaning of the Revelation&lt;/em> (London: SPCK, 1931), 265.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[3] See Josephus, &lt;em>The Jewish War&lt;/em>, 3.1.3; 3.4.2; 5.1.6; 7.1.3.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[4] Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., &lt;em>The Divorce of Israel: A Redemptive-Historical Interpretation of Revelation&lt;/em>, 2 vols. (2024), 1:808-810.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[5] Gary DeMar, &lt;em>&lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/ten-popular-prophecy-myths-exposed-and-answered" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Ten Popular Prophecy Myths Exposed and Answered&lt;/a>&lt;/em> (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, 2010), chap. 2 and Gary DeMar with Francis X. Gumerlock, &lt;em>&lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-rapture-and-the-fig-tree-generation" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">The Rapture and the Fig Tree Generation&lt;/a>&lt;/em> (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, 2020).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[6] Mohammed Hardan, “Falling Waters of Euphrates, Tigris Rivers Reveal Submerged Archaeological Sites,” &lt;em>Al-Monitor&lt;/em> (August 27, 2022). Link &lt;a href="https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2022/08/falling-waters-euphrates-tigris-rivers-reveal-submerged-archaeological-sites" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">here&lt;/a>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[7] Hardan, “Falling Waters of Euphrates, Tigris Rivers Reveal Submerged Archaeological Sites.”&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[8] “Is The Drying Up of The Euphrates River the Fulfillment Of Bible Prophecy,” &lt;em>Encounter Today&lt;/em> (January 31, 2023). Link &lt;a href="https://revivalnation.com/blog/2023/01/31/is-the-drying-up-of-the-euphrates-river-the-fulfillment-of-bible-prophecy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">here&lt;/a>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>What Does the Bible Really Say About the End Times?</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/what-does-the-bible-really-say-about-the-end-times/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 08:03:28 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/what-does-the-bible-really-say-about-the-end-times/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>In this &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/what-does-the-bible-really-say-about-end-times" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">second part&lt;/a> of his recent interview on a Canadian television show, Gary continues the conversation by taking a closer look at the context of the New Testament.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>What about world conditions? Aren’t we seeing prophecy being fulfilled right before our eyes? This protest is offered when people are hit with an interpretation that does not fit their long-held doctrinal views. They shift from the clear teaching of Scripture to current events. The Bible is then read through the lens of today’s newsprint, a form of “newspaper exegesis.” When current events change, somehow the clear teaching of the Bible on these subjects also changes. Few people ever take the time to check what prophecy “experts” wrote ten years earlier.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Our nation, and every nation, could go through the most tumultuous upheaval that history has ever experienced, and this still would not mean that Jesus was returning “in our generation.” For date setters, history is ignored and the Bible is twisted to fit a preconceived view of prophecy; the result is that the church experiences wild gyrations in the field of biblical prophecy. &lt;em>Last Days Madness&lt;/em> was written to take a fresh look at the Bible. There is little that is new in the following pages. As you will read, the views expressed herein have been around for centuries. Unfortunately, they have been buried under millions of copies of paperback books that have assured us year after year that the end is near.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/LDM-front_large.png?v=1572279906" alt="Last Days Madness">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Last Days Madness&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>In this authoritative book, Gary DeMar clears the haze of "end-times" fever, shedding light on the most difficult and studied prophetic passages in the Bible, including Daniel 7:13-14; 9:24-27; Matt. 16:27-28; 24-25; Thess. 2; 2 Peter 3:3-13, and clearly explaining a host of other controversial topics.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/last-days-madness" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>In this second part of his recent interview on a Canadian television show, Gary continues the conversation by taking a closer look at the context of the New Testament. Being a Berean means questioning popular assumptions to &amp;ldquo;see if these things are so.&amp;rdquo; A careful and honest study must be made to determine whether the time markers in the New Testament point to a distant future—or to a fulfillment tied to the first-century audience.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/what-does-the-bible-really-say-about-end-times" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GV6ZPKehCo" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Watch the video interview here&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here to browse all episodes of The Gary DeMar Podcast&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The ‘Rapture’ is Being used to Boost Book Sales</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/the-rapture-is-being-used-to-boost-book-sales/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 08:29:14 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/the-rapture-is-being-used-to-boost-book-sales/</guid><description>&lt;p>Once again, the Bible is being interpreted through the lens of current events. “All the signs are in place,” prophecy “experts” tell us.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Nearly eight out of 10 Evangelicals say they believe the ongoing violence in the Middle East is an indication that the rapture is on the horizon, a new survey &amp;hellip; shows.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Research conducted by the Brookings Institute&amp;rsquo;s Center for Middle East Policy on Americans’ attitudes toward the Middle East and Israel found that 79 percent of Evangelicals say they believe “that the unfolding violence across the Middle East is a sign that the end times are nearer.” (&lt;a href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/79-percent-of-evangelicas-see-violence-in-middle-east-as-sign-end-times-are-near-151702/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Christian Post&lt;/a>)&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>But this is not true if a person believes in a pre-trib rapture. David Jeremiah, who believes in an “any moment rapture,” wrote a book with the title &lt;em>The Book of Signs&lt;/em>. Mark Hitchcock wrote, &lt;em>Seven Signs of the End Times&lt;/em>. Nearly every book, podcaster, and Bible prophecy expert wannabe believes that signs indicate a near rapture. But the “rapture” is said to be a signless event.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/figtree_large.png?v=1578455246" alt="The Rapture and the Fig Tree Generation">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>The Rapture and the Fig Tree Generation&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>For decades Christians have been enticed with the belief that they would be taken to heaven before a coming tribulation period in an event called the “rapture.” Since the national reestablishment of Israel in 1948, countless books and pamphlets have been written defending the doctrine assuring readers that it could happen at any moment. Some prophecy writers claimed the “rapture” would take place before 1988. We are far removed from that date. Where are we in God’s prophetic timetable? &lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-rapture-and-the-fig-tree-generation" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>There is little that is new in these types of surveys. &lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-day-and-the-hour-christianitys-perennial-fascination-with-predicting-the-end-of-the-world" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">For centuries Christians have believed current events were precursors of the end times&lt;/a>. Two world wars in the 20th century, the French revolution in the 18th century, “wars and rumors of wars” throughout the world, the Black Death (Bubonic Plague) of the Middle Ages, the 1755 Lisbon earthquake, and even the rise of Islam centuries ago have been considered end-time signs. Once again, Christian prophecy enthusiasts are being conned to boost book sales.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>The Late Great Planet Earth&lt;/em> (1970) made Hal Lindsey a multi-millionaire. The Left Behind series did the same for Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The following was written by prophecy writer Wilbur Smith (1894-1976) about Egypt and the end times.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Personally, I must confess that when this recent crisis [of 1956] occurred in Egypt, I was driven to examine, for the first time in years of study of Biblical prophecy, the whole subject of Egypt in Israel’s history and in the Old Testament predictions concerning certain other nations of that part of the earth. Had someone placed before me, six months ago, an examination covering Egypt in Biblical &lt;em>prophecy&lt;/em>, I would have “flunked” it, even if the questions were not of a technical nature. However, when newspapers were recently filled with reports from Egypt day by day, I was unable to escape a desire to review the whole theme of Egypt in the Biblical writings, both historical and prophetical.&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Like today, the newspapers in Smith’s day (1956) were “filled with reports from Egypt,” and because of that he concluded those events had something to do with Bible prophecy. The events he was referring to happened 70 years ago. The same claims, only the names, countries, and dates have changed.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The “recent crisis of 1956” that Smith referred to concerned who would control the Suez Canal, a significant world chokepoint connecting the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea. Without this narrow passageway water transportation between Europe and Asia one would have had to navigate around Africa. When’s the last time you heard anything about the Suez Canal? Now it’s the Strait of Hormuz.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/10PMfr_large.png?v=1726012494" alt="Ten Popular Prophecy Myths Exposed and Answered">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Ten Popular Prophecy Myths Exposed and Answered&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Since the reestablishment of Israel in 1948, “end-time” prophetic speculation has been on the rise. While there is a long history of date setting, the past century has seen an exponential increase in the number of books proclaiming that the end is near. It’s time that the “Boy who cried wolf” syndrome be dealt with in a biblical way.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/ten-popular-prophecy-myths-exposed-and-answered" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>John F. Walvoord’s 1974 book, &lt;em>Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East Crisis&lt;/em>, has undergone several revisions as supposed prophetic events changed. The book opens with this claim: “Each day’s headlines raise new questions concerning what the future holds.”&lt;strong>[2]&lt;/strong> That was in 1974. Described as “the world’s foremost interpreter of biblical prophecy,” in 1991 he expected “‘the Rapture to occur in his own lifetime.’”&lt;strong>[3]&lt;/strong> Walvoord died in December of 2002.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Walvoord’s &lt;em>Armageddon&lt;/em> book was reprinted in 1976 and then sank without a trace until a revised edition appeared in late 1990 based on then-current headlines. It was decisively predictive based on events that were taking place during the first Gulf War 36 years ago!&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>The world today is like a stage being set for a great drama. The major actors are already in the wings waiting for their moment in history. The main stage props are already in place. The prophetic play is about to begin&amp;hellip;. Our present world is well prepared for the beginning of the prophetic drama that will lead to Armageddon. Since the stage is set for this dramatic climax of the age, it must mean that Christ’s coming for his own is very near.&lt;strong>[4]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Not many people realized that the revised editions core content was nearly sixteen years old when it was reissued. When the Gulf War ended abruptly, the book was twenty-five cents a copy if bought by the case! But by then the book had sold nearly 1.7 million copies and was “the recipient of the Platinum Book Award from the Evangelical Christian Publishers Association.”&lt;strong>[5]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Tyndale House Publishers released a third edition in 2007 with a revised title and content edited and written by one of his sons and Mark Hitchcock to reflect a change in a set of new current events: &lt;em>Armageddon, Oil, and Terror&lt;/em>.&lt;strong>[6]&lt;/strong> The promotion material assured readers that its content “is as current as today’s news . . . and every prediction rings true.” Where have we heard that before? That’s right! In 1974 when the first edition of &lt;em>Armageddon, Oil, and the Middle East Crisis&lt;/em> was published, and the same wording was used—33 years later.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I suspect that the 79% who believe that current events in the Middle East relate to the end times don’t have a clue about the assured predictions of past prophecy writers. The &lt;em>Christian Post&lt;/em> article cited above goes on to report the following:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Meanwhile, 63 percent of Evangelicals and 51 percent of non-Evangelical Christians believe that “for the rapture or Second Coming to occur, it is essential for current-day Israel to include all of the land they believed was promised to biblical Israel in the Old Testament.”&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>There is a problem with this statement. &lt;em>First&lt;/em>, the New Testament doesn’t say anything about Israel returning to the land as being a fulfillment of Bible prophecy. Israel was already in the land in Jesus’ day and the lead up to the destruction of the temple in AD 70.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/pwfr_large.png?v=1736370066" alt="Prophecy Wars: The Biblical Battle Over the End Times">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Prophecy Wars: The Biblical Battle Over the End Times&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>If you’re willing to take the Bible at its word, the study of prophecy can strengthen your faith, but if your trust is in man’s speculations, you will be disappointed every time. And that is why Bible prophecy is such a crucial area for apologetics. Skeptics of all stripes have condemned the Bible as inaccurate merely because various well-meaning Christians have been in error about the End Times.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/prophecy-wars-the-biblical-battle-over-the-end-times" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Second&lt;/em>, the Old Testament did predict Israel would return to the land. The people returned, the nation was reestablished, and the temple was rebuilt. The Jews returned to the land after the Babylonian captivity (see the books of Ezra and Nehemiah). That’s why there were Jews living in Israel when Jesus was born and the temple was being refurbished.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Third&lt;/em>, Israel had received all that had been promised regarding the land:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>So the Lord gave Israel all the land which He had sworn to give to their fathers, and they possessed it and lived in it. And the Lord gave them rest on every side, according to all that He had sworn to their fathers, and no one of all their enemies stood before them; the Lord gave all their enemies into their hand. Not one of the good promises which the Lord had made to the house of Israel failed; all came to pass (Josh. 21:43-45).&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>This was confirmed during Solomon’s reign: “Judah and Israel were as numerous as the sand that is on the seashore in abundance [Deut. 1:10; 7:7; 10:22; 26:5; 28:62; Gen. 15:5; 22:17; 32:12; 1 Kings 3:8; Jer. 33:22; Heb. 11:12]; &lt;em>they&lt;/em> were eating and drinking and rejoicing. Now Solomon ruled over all the kingdoms from the River to the land of the Philistines and to the border of Egypt; &lt;em>they&lt;/em> brought tribute and served Solomon all the days of his life” (1 Kings 4:20-21).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Fourth&lt;/em>, the most popular end-time perspective today is called dispensational premillennialism. This view teaches that no prophecy can be fulfilled until the church is “raptured,” an event that has not taken place yet. (The Bible does not say one word about the church being taken off the earth before, during, or after seven years.)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Well-known dispensational author Earl D. Radmacher (1931-2014) made an important point related to people who claim that certain world events are signs of an end-time event:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Equally as unjustified as date-setting for Christ’s return are the numerous sermons attempting to find fulfillment of prophecy in this age. Typical of them is a popular author, conference speaker, and television personality who has stated his belief that the “paramount prophetic sign” is that Israel had to be a nation again in the land of its forefathers. This condition was fulfilled, he claims, on May 14, 1948.&lt;strong>[7]&lt;/strong> This pronouncement is simply representative of hundreds, perhaps, thousands, of others who, although eager in their anticipation of Christ’s coming, distort the Scripture and cause terrible confusion for God’s people.&lt;strong>[8]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Radmacher called using Israel becoming a nation again in 1948 a prophetic sign a distortion of Scripture that causes “terrible confusion for God’s people.” “This conflicting emphasis,” he wrote, “begets the rather embarrassing plight of talking about signs of a signless event.”&lt;strong>[9]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>[1] Wilbur Smith, &lt;em>Egypt in Biblical Prophecy&lt;/em> (Boston: W. A. Wilde Company, 1957), 5.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[2] John F. Walvoord and John E. Walvoord, &lt;em>Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East Crisis&lt;/em> (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1974), 7.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[3] Quoted in Kenneth L. Woodward, “The Final Days are Here Again,” &lt;em>Newsweek&lt;/em> (March 18, 1991), 55.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[4] John F. Walvoord, &lt;em>Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East Crisis&lt;/em> (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1990), 228.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[5] As reported in “Zondervan Book on Prophecy Receives Bestselling Award” by Zondervan Publishing House (1991). On file.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[6] John E. Walvoord and Mark Hitchcock, &lt;em>Armageddon, Oil, and Terror: What the Bible Says About the Future of America, the Middle East, and the End of Western Civilization&lt;/em> (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale, 2007).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[7] “The one event which many Bible students in the past overlooked was this paramount prophetic sign: Israel had to be a nation again in the land of its forefathers.” (Hal Lindsey, &lt;em>The Late Great Planet Earth&lt;/em> (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1970), 43.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[8] Earl D. Radmacher, “The Imminent Return of the Lord,” &lt;em>Issues in Dispensationalism&lt;/em>, eds. Wesley R. Willis and John R. Master (Chicago: Moody Press, 1994), 248.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[9] Radmacher, “The Imminent Return of the Lord,” 248.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Separating Prophetic Fact from Fiction</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/separating-prophetic-fact-from-fiction/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 07:43:37 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/separating-prophetic-fact-from-fiction/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>In this &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/separating-prophetic-fact-from-fiction" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">first part&lt;/a> of his recent three-part interview on the Canadian television show, Thrive, Gary recounts his own history with Bible prophecy.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The interpretive methodology outlined in &lt;em>Last Days Madness&lt;/em> is not innovative. For nearly 200 years Christians have been sidetracked by a novel interpretive methodology known as dispensational premillennialism. While &lt;em>Last Days Madness&lt;/em> is not primarily directed at dispensationalism, much of what is addressed herein is critical of this very popular interpretive prophetic belief system.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>After doing numerous radio interviews and debates, I learned where certain arguments could be better stated and supported by Scripture and history. Most of the new books on prophecy simply restate the tired and still unproven assumptions of the old books. The additional study that went into this edition of &lt;em>Last Days Madness&lt;/em> has continued to solidify my conviction that the time texts are key indicators of when certain prophetic events will take place. Most books on prophecy do not interpret time texts literally. In fact, some books ignore the time texts altogether.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>For example, Robert Van Kampen quotes a portion of Revelation 1:1, leaving out this very important phrase: “the things which must shortly take place.” He follows the same method when he does not quote all of Revelation 1:3, leaving out “for the time is near.” He claims to interpret the Bible literally, but he refuses to handle these texts in a literal way. In his latest book, Van Kampen once again suspiciously fails to deal with the time texts. There is no discussion of Revelation 1:1 (“shortly”) and 1:3 (“near”). Matthew 16:27-28, a crucial time text, is not dealt with. On the dedication page, he concludes with “Come quickly, Lord Jesus,” and yet he does not expound on Revelation 22:20 where Jesus said nearly 2000 years ago, “Yes, I am coming quickly.” In his analysis of those of us who believe the time texts are supremely important, he writes:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Both the allegorical and spiritualized views must deny a literal understanding of the prophecies found in the Book of Daniel, the Olivet Discourse, and the greater part of the Book of Revelation. Preterists view these passages as past, historical events (even though nothing historically has ever happened that bears any resemblance to these specific passages), with minimal end-time relevance.&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>A preterist is someone who believes that certain prophecies have been fulfilled, that is, their fulfillment is in the past. For example, Floyd Hamilton, writes that there “are in the Old Testament 332 distinct predictions which are literally fulfilled in Christ.” All Christians are preterists regarding these prophecies since they believe they have been fulfilled in Jesus Christ. Jews who are still waiting for the promised Messiah are anti-preterists since they believe these prophetic passages have not been fulfilled. They are futurists.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/LDM-front_large.png?v=1572279906" alt="Last Days Madness">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Last Days Madness&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>In this authoritative book, Gary DeMar clears the haze of "end-times" fever, shedding light on the most difficult and studied prophetic passages in the Bible, including Daniel 7:13-14; 9:24-27; Matt. 16:27-28; 24-25; Thess. 2; 2 Peter 3:3-13, and clearly explaining a host of other controversial topics.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/last-days-madness" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>In this first part of his recent three-part interview on the Canadian television show, Thrive, Gary recounts his own history with Bible prophecy. Most Christians have never heard any other view of Bible prophecy than the popular Christian bookstore version, and the hosts of this show wanted that to change for their audience.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/separating-prophetic-fact-from-fiction" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIyNjojoTmw&amp;amp;t" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Watch the video interview here&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here to browse all episodes of The Gary DeMar Podcast&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Episode 86: How to Identify the Abomination of Desolation</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/episode-86-how-to-identify-the-abomination-of-desolation/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 07:49:25 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/episode-86-how-to-identify-the-abomination-of-desolation/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;strong>Bible Prophecy Under the Microscope-Episode 86&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Gary &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/how-to-identify-the-abomination-of-desolation-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">responds to another video&lt;/a> by Joel Richardson and his claims about the &amp;ldquo;abomination of desolation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The abomination of desolation is mentioned in one Old Testament book (Dan. 9:27; 11:31; 12:11). The book of Maccabees, a non-inspired book written during the intertestamental period, mentions the abomination of desolation and its relationship to Antiochus Epiphanes (168 B.C.) (1 Macc. 1:10-64; 4:36-59; 6:7; 2 Macc. 10:1-8). First-century Jews would have been familiar with the theology and history surrounding the abomination of desolation. There was no doubt in the minds of those who read and understood Jesus’ words in Matthew 24:15 that the abomination of desolation prophecy was fulfilled in events leading up to the temple’s destruction in A.D. 70. The Apostle Paul would later address the concerns of the Thessalonians about the “day of the Lord” with a discussion of the man of lawlessness” (2 Thess. 2). The man of lawlessness was a contemporary figure who was identified with the “abomination of desolation.”&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Further study on this important topic should leave no doubt that Matthew 24:15 was fulfilled in its entirety before the passing away of the generation that heard Jesus’ prophecy on the Mount of Olives. Again, the time text of verse 34 compels us to look for a candidate within the time frame of the generation that heard the prophecy.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>“Therefore when you see the ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand)…” (Matt. 24:15).&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>There is an unbroken transition from verse 14 to verse 15 in Matthew 24. By comparing Luke 21:20-21 and Matthew 24:15-18, we can pinpoint the time when the abomination of desolation was to appear. Luke tells us, “When you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is at hand. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, and let those who are in the midst of the city depart, and let not those who are in the country enter the city” (Luke 21:20-21). Was Jerusalem ever surrounded by armies prior to A.D. 70? Yes! Did Jesus’ disciples flee the city? Yes!&lt;/p>
&lt;p>While futurists (typically dispensationalists) generally acknowledge that Luke is describing events prior to A.D. 70, they assert that Matthew is recounting a different series of events that are still future. For these futurists, Matthew’s abomination of desolation will appear in a rebuilt temple during the so-called “seven-year tribulation period” after the pre-tribulational rapture of the church. Only a preconceived theological system could ever twist these verses in this way. It is obvious that all three gospel writers are describing the same series of events and period of time.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/LDM-front_large.png?v=1572279906" alt="Last Days Madness">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Last Days Madness&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>In this authoritative book, Gary DeMar clears the haze of "end-times" fever, shedding light on the most difficult and studied prophetic passages in the Bible, including Daniel 7:13-14; 9:24-27; Matt. 16:27-28; 24-25; Thess. 2; 2 Peter 3:3-13, and clearly explaining a host of other controversial topics.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/last-days-madness" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Gary responds to another video by Joel Richardson and his claims about the &amp;ldquo;abomination of desolation.&amp;rdquo; Gary walks through the Bible and shows what it actually teaches about this &amp;ldquo;abomination&amp;rdquo; and where it was fulfilled in the past, not the future. A temple must exist for this prophecy to happen, which can&amp;rsquo;t make it relevant to today. But wait, the temple will be rebuilt&amp;hellip;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/how-to-identify-the-abomination-of-desolation-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://americanvision.org/categories/microscope/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for all episodes of Bible Prophecy Under the Microscope&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Joel Richardson's Abominable Interpretation of the 'Abomination of Desolation'</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/joel-richardsons-abominable-interpretation-of-the-abomination-of-desolation/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 06:43:15 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/joel-richardsons-abominable-interpretation-of-the-abomination-of-desolation/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>“Therefore, when &lt;strong>you see&lt;/strong> the ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place—let the reader understand—” (Matthew 24:15).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>“When &lt;strong>you see&lt;/strong> the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place.”&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Joel Richardson claims that Matthew 24:15 has not been fulfilled. The temple was still standing when Jesus issued this dire prediction. To be fulfilled sometime in the future (our future) requires another rebuilt temple. The NT never mentions that the temple would be built again. Not a single verse. This point alone negates Richardson’s future abomination of desolation belief.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The goal in interpreting the Bible is to be familiar with a text and its &lt;strong>context&lt;/strong>. The Bible can be made to say anything if verses are separated from their context and strung together with other verses separated from &lt;strong>their&lt;/strong> context:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>• “Judas went out and hanged himself” (Matt. 27:5).&lt;br>
• “Go and do likewise” (Luke 10:37).&lt;br>
• “Whatever you do, do quickly” (John 13:27).&lt;br>
• Because “there is no God” (Ps. 14:1).&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/mlht1_large.png?v=1365620692" alt="Myths. Lies, and Half-Truths">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Myths. Lies, and Half-Truths&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>In order to demonstrate the validity of Christianity as a religion for all of life, it is necessary to demythologize the misrepresentations that have been nurtured by a bewildering number of unorthodox theologies. These “cherished myths” have had the effect of neutralizing the Word of God as it relates to this world. Christianity has often been accused of being too “otherworldly” in that it has failed to offer viable political, economic, judicial, and social programs for the world order. &lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/myths-lies-and-half-truths" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Joel Richardson does this repeatedly in every podcast I’ve seen of his.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>First: Audience Relevance&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The solution to the “when” of the abomination of desolation, is asking, To whom is Jesus speaking? Who were the plural “you”? Jesus made it clear that the “you” were the people who asked the question. “When will these things be?” (Matt. 24:3). They were the audience. They were the “you.” It’s so obvious that a person must make up stuff to get around this fact. It’s indisputable that abomination of desolation was a first-century event.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>How would those who first heard what Jesus said have interpreted “you”? If &lt;strong>you&lt;/strong> were in that audience, and heard what Jesus said, what would &lt;strong>you&lt;/strong> have thought? If Jesus had a distant future audience in view, He would have said “when &lt;strong>they see&lt;/strong> the abomination of desolation.” But He did not. The “you” was them. This point alone should end the debate.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>Second: The Historical Setting&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>What comes before 24:15?&lt;/p>
&lt;ol>
&lt;li>
&lt;pre>&lt;code>Wars and rumors of wars. There were wars and rumors of wars before that generation passed away. Look at the historical record of that time.
&lt;/code>&lt;/pre>
&lt;/li>
&lt;li>
&lt;pre>&lt;code>Earthquakes are mentioned in Acts 16:25-28 and in the historical record of that time.
&lt;/code>&lt;/pre>
&lt;/li>
&lt;li>
&lt;pre>&lt;code>A famine is mentioned in Acts 11:28 and in the historical record at that time.
&lt;/code>&lt;/pre>
&lt;/li>
&lt;li>
&lt;pre>&lt;code>False prophets (1 John 4:1).
&lt;/code>&lt;/pre>
&lt;/li>
&lt;li>
&lt;pre>&lt;code>The gospel going to the whole *oikoumenē*. The gospel has been preached to all the nations at that time, “being proclaimed throughout the whole world” (Rom. 1:8; 10:18-21; 16:25-26; 1 Tim. 3:16; Col. 1:6, 23).
&lt;/code>&lt;/pre>
&lt;/li>
&lt;li>
&lt;pre>&lt;code>I cover all these points in my books ***[Wars and Rumors of Wars](https://store.americanvision.org/products/wars-and-rumors-of-wars)*** and ***[Last Days Madness](https://store.americanvision.org/products/last-days-madness)***. John Bray also deals with them in his book ***[Matthew 24 Fulfilled](https://store.americanvision.org/products/matthew-24-fulfilled)***.
&lt;/code>&lt;/pre>
&lt;/li>
&lt;/ol>
&lt;p>What comes after?&lt;/p>
&lt;ol>
&lt;li>
&lt;pre>&lt;code>Homes with flat roofs. When’s the last time you were on your roof? Flat roofs were common in Israel in Jesus’ day (Mark 2:4).
&lt;/code>&lt;/pre>
&lt;/li>
&lt;li>
&lt;pre>&lt;code>The importance of cloaks. “The man working in the field is not to bother going back for anything, not even his cloak. The cloak is the one thing that is so precious and needful that it cannot be taken as a pledge during the nighttime hours but has to be returned each night to its owner (Ex. 22:26-27).” Why would anyone today go back for his or her cloak?
&lt;/code>&lt;/pre>
&lt;/li>
&lt;li>
&lt;pre>&lt;code>Sabbath still operating. Where? Mostly in Israel and places like New York City like the [Eruv](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv). A Sabbath day’s journey was still in use in the first century (Acts 1:12).
&lt;/code>&lt;/pre>
&lt;/li>
&lt;li>
&lt;pre>&lt;code>Escape on foot to the mountains outside Judea. It was a local judgment, not a worldwide event.
&lt;/code>&lt;/pre>
&lt;/li>
&lt;/ol>
&lt;p>We know the temple was destroyed just like Jesus said it would be (Matt. 24:2) before their generation passed away (v. 34), a fact that is attested by history that no one disputes. “‘Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to &lt;strong>you&lt;/strong>, not one stone &lt;strong>here&lt;/strong> shall be left upon another, which will not be torn down’” (24:2). Jesus was discussing what stood right before their eyes; the temple that was “there.” Their question was prompted by what Jesus said in Matthew 23:38: “Your house will be left to you desolate.” That’s why Jesus’ disciple asked about the temple. “You mean this temple that is being rebuilt greater than its former glory? (Luke 21:5)&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Richardson then drags the antichrist into the context: “what the antichrist will do in the last days,” he says. There is no mention of “the antichrist” in Matthew 24, and that includes verse 15 unless the apostate priesthood were the antichrists as defined by John (1 John 3:18, 22; 4:1-3; 2 John 7). Again, there is no mention of a rebuilt temple, something that’s required for Richardson’s interpretation to work. The NT only mentions the destruction of the temple before their generation passed away (v. 34), never its rebuilding.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Richardson mentions R.C. Sproul, Kenneth Gentry, and me in his podcast about the abomination of desolation. Here’s what Richardson says about Sproul and Gentry.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Sproul wrote the following in his book &lt;em>The Last Days According to Jesus&lt;/em>, “The Roman armies brought their standards into the temple area…. These standards were objects of idolatrous worship and thus constituted the abomination of desolation.” Kenneth Gentry wrote something similar: “The Roman armies with their idolatrous standards stand in the holy place fulfilling the abomination of desolation.”&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Richardson does not mention my comments on the subject, even though I include 15 pages on the topic in chapter 8 of my book &lt;em>&lt;strong>&lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/last-days-madness" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Last Days Madness&lt;/a>&lt;/strong>&lt;/em>. I do not agree with Sproul and Gentry, and neither does preterist James Jordan in his commentary, &lt;em>&lt;strong>&lt;a href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/matthew-23-25-a-literary-historical-and-theological-commentary" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Matthew 23-25: A Literary, Historical, and Theological Commentary&lt;/a>&lt;/strong>&lt;/em>: “But there is absolutely no way that the phrase ‘abomination of desolation’ can refer to a gathering of armies. More likely, Luke’s account is speaking of the gathering of Roman armies a few years after the abomination of desolation was set up.”&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/mt23-front_large.png?v=1650717586" alt="Matthew 23-25: A Literary, Historical, and Theological Commentary">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Matthew 23-25: A Literary, Historical, and Theological Commentary&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Those who first read Matthew’s gospel only would have had as an interpretive reference what we describe as the Old Testament. They were living the history that Jesus said would take place before their generation passed away. They would have immediately noted the Old Testament parallels with the abomination of desolation (Matt. 24:15; Dan. 9:27), the judgment on Sodom and fleeing to the mountains to escape the coming conflagration (Matt. 24:16; Gen. 19:17), false prophets (Matt. 24:24; Jer. 14:14), signs in the sun, moon, and stars (Matt. 24:29; Isa. 3:10; 24:33; Ezek. 32:7; Amos 5:2; 8:9; etc.), the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven (Matt. 24:30; Dan. 7:13), and so much more.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/matthew-23-25-a-literary-historical-and-theological-commentary" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Richardson needs to do more research if he’s going to be faithful critic of what he claims preterists believe.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Why would God destroy the temple for something the Roman armies did? The abomination that resulted in desolation must have been something those who had access to the Holy of Holies did. That would have been the priesthood. Any sacrifice that was done by the priests would have been an abomination. James Jordan’s &lt;a href="https://theopolisinstitute.com/the-abomination-of-desolation-part-1/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">four-part article&lt;/a> on the Abomination of Desolation also includes an exposition of Daniel 9:24-27 that Jesus references in Matthew 24:15. Here’s what Jordan says about Daniel 11:31.&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>[W]e need to ask who were the “forces from him” that desecrated the sanctuary and set up the desolating sacrilege? They were the reigning High Priests Jason and Menelaus, who apostatized to Greek religion, and who invited Antiochus to help them take over Jerusalem for their purposes (Josephus, &lt;em>Antiquities&lt;/em> 12:5:1). In the same way, the apostate High Priests between A.D. 30 and 70 cooperated with the Romans to suppress the Christian faith and to maintain their own Sadducean combination of Greek philosophy and apostate Judaism…. Antiochus defiled the Temple, but this is only the aftermath of what the Jews had already done. Antiochus could not really defile the Temple, because he was not one of God’s peculiar people and he had no legal access to it. His defiling the temple is not the abomination of desolation, therefore.&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Jordan’s article is superb. Joel Richardson should take some time off from his highly inaccurate podcasts and read it.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>What took place in the lead up to the destruction of the temple had happened when the priests committed the “desolating sacrilege,” beginning in Ezekiel 8:5-18 and continues through chapter 11. I believe that’s why Jesus said, “let the reader understand” in Matthew 24:15. Jewish readers in Jesus’ day would have understood. “We’ve heard this language before.” It had happened before, and it wasn’t Nebuchadnezzar; it was the priesthood. There’s was more going on than the Roman armies or an end-time antichrist which the New Testament never mentions. The abomination was local and came from the priesthood. Read Matthew 23. It’s all there. That’s why Jesus described Jerusalem as Sodom and Egypt in Revelation 11:8.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Jordan succinctly explains who brought the abomination that resulted in the desolation of the temple: “As a result of my studies in Leviticus, I have come to the conclusion that the abomination of desolation spoken of in Daniel 9 and Matthew 24 is none other than apostate Judaism, and that the Man of Sin spoken of in 2 Thessalonians 2 is the apostate High Priest of Israel.”&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Exodus Mandate and Homeschooling</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/ray-moore-and-exodus-mandate/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 07:29:32 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/ray-moore-and-exodus-mandate/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>Gary &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/exodus-mandate-and-homeschooling" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">interviews&lt;/a> Ray Moore with Exodus Mandate about homeschooling, Christian schools, and a debate that Ray did over America&amp;rsquo;s Christian history.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>When Israel was taken to the borders of the promised land, twelve spies were called on to survey the land and report their findings to the nation (Num. 13). Before choosing twelve representatives for the task, God promised the land would be theirs: “Send out for yourself men so that they may spy out the land of Canaan, which I am going to give to the sons of Israel; you shall send a man from each of their fathers’ tribes, every one a leader among them” (13:2). No matter what the spies encountered, the promise of God should have had priority and overruled any desire to retreat. When the spies returned, ten brought back pessimistic (unbelieving) reports (13:28–29, 31–33). Two spies, Joshua and Caleb, returned with optimistic reports because they believed God and not the fears of men, nor the circumstances they encountered (13:30). It is important to note that Caleb never denied that there were “giants in the land,” he simply believed that God was stronger (obviously) than any army of giants. Why is this so?: “You are from God, little children, and have overcome them; because greater is He that is in you than he who is in the world” (1 John 4:4).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The nation responded to the report without faith. In effect, they called God a liar: “Then all the congregation lifted up their voices and cried, and the people wept that night” (14:1). Their refusal to believe the promise of God (cf. 13:2) brought judgment upon the entire nation. Israel did not enter the promised land until forty years passed and the unbelieving generation died (14:26–38). Their pessimistic perspective of the future affected their plans for the future. The task of dominion was seen as too great for God, hence too great for man under God’s providence. Instead of moving forward they chose retreat to the past: “Would that we had died in the land of Egypt! Or would that we had died in the wilderness! And why is the LORD bringing us into this land, to fall by the sword? Our wives and our little ones will become plunder; would it not be better for us to return to Egypt? So they said to one another, ‘Let us appoint a leader and return to Egypt’” (14:2–4).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>A pessimistic faith ruins Christian dominion. Israel lost forty years of dominion because the nation trusted the words of men and the circumstances of the world more than the word of God. When Israel entered the land forty years later, Rahab told the two unnamed spies what the inhabitants were thinking: “For we have heard how the LORD dried up the water of the Red Sea before you when you came out of Egypt, and what you did to the two kings of the Amorites who were beyond the Jordan, to Sihon and Og, whom you utterly destroyed. And when we heard it, our hearts melted and no courage remained in any man any longer because of you” (Josh. 2:10–11). The Canaanites looked upon the Israelites, at the time Israel was freed from Egyptian bondage over forty years before, as the giants. Forty years of dominion were wasted because Israel failed to trust the God who possesses the future (and controls the present in order to fulfill His plan for the future).&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/bkp5647_front.1__78227_zoom__29640.1342099739.1280.1280_large.jpg?v=1364990075" alt="Whoever Controls the Schools Rules the World">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Whoever Controls the Schools Rules the World&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>It&amp;#39;s been said that &amp;quot;the philosophy of the classroom in this generation will be the philosophy of life in the next generation.&amp;quot; Our earliest founding fathers understood this. That&amp;#39;s why, after building homes and churches, they established educational institutions like Harvard, Yale, Columbia, and Dartmouth. Over time, most Christians have adopted the false premise that facts are neutral. They believe it doesn&amp;#39;t matter who teaches math, science, and history, because facts are facts. The humanists took advantage of this type of thinking by gradually shaping and controlling education in terms of materialist assumptions. &lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/whoever-controls-the-schools-rules-the-world" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Gary interviews Ray Moore with Exodus Mandate about homeschooling, Christian schools, and a debate that Ray did over America&amp;rsquo;s Christian history. Ray is a major proponent of getting Christians to leave public schools and his organization provides support and educational materials to aid in the transition once parents decide to educate at home or even start a Christian school in their area.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/exodus-mandate-and-homeschooling" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here to browse all episodes of The Gary DeMar Podcast&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Dispensationalism’s Predicted Inevitable ‘Road to Holocaust’</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/dispensationalisms-predicted-inevitable-road-to-holocaust/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 07:47:56 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/dispensationalisms-predicted-inevitable-road-to-holocaust/</guid><description>&lt;p>If &lt;em>The Road to Holocaust&lt;/em> is unfamiliar, it is the title of a book Hal Lindsey wrote in 1989, published by secular publisher Bantam Books (666 Fifth Avenue, NYC). Lindsey claimed that if you did not believe in a pre-tribulational rapture but believed instead that God’s Word applied to all areas of life and Christians should work for that goal, then you believed it “could lead us—and Israel— to disaster.”&lt;/p>
&lt;p>While going through some of my many files, I came across a folder containing letters from Dr. Gary North to Hal Lindsey regarding the publication of &lt;em>The Road to Holocaust&lt;/em> that accused Lindsey of gross negligence and numerous errors. Dr. North, R. J. Rushdoony, David Chilton, Ray Sutton, James Jordan, Greg Bahnsen, and I are mentioned and smeared by innuendo and outright lies. Supposedly, I’m “the head of the Institute of Christian Government” (34). False. “It is rumored that [Greg Bahnsen] read Dr. Rushdoony’s works as a boy.” True. It’s a rumor. Rumors have no place in scholarly works. “Gary North earned his doctor’s degree in economics from the University of California-Riverside.” False. Gary North earned his doctor’s degree in history. The General Counsel for Bantam Books stated that &lt;em>The Road to Holocaust&lt;/em> is an “exhaustive study of the published literature” of the above-named authors. Then why does Rousas John Rushdoony’s name read John Rousas Rushdoony in every footnote?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img src="https://americanvision.org/images/uploads/hlroad.png" alt="Hal Lindsey Road to Holocaust" title="Hal Lindsey Road to Holocaust">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>For a critique of &lt;em>The Road to Holocaust&lt;/em>, see the book published by American Vision titled &lt;em>The Legacy of Hatred Continues&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/legacy_large.jpg?v=1735254353" alt="The Legacy of Hatred Continues (PDF)">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>The Legacy of Hatred Continues (PDF)&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>"Anti-Semitism." The word conjures up thoughts of Nazism, Adolf Hitler, and gas ovens. In our day "anti-semitism" is real, with swastikas painted on synagogues and verbal epithets hurled at Jews by the Ku Klux Klan and so-called "white supremacists." Purging our land of such an evil will not be accomplished by accusing someone of "anti-Semitism" when there is not a shred of evidence to support the claim. Hal Lindsey labeled anyone who did not agree with him on the issue of eschatology as "unconsciously anti-Semitic." Lies and slander will accomplish nothing.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-legacy-of-hatred-continues" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>&lt;em>The Road to Holocaust&lt;/em> was and remains a cover for what dispensationalism teaches about the future of Israel: there will be a post-rapture holocaust of the Jews during the Great Tribulation. At the 2012 Democratic National Convention, Mark Alan Siegel, who served as the chairman of Florida’s Palm Beach County Democratic Party, knew about dispensationalism’s required holocaust:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>The Christians just want us to be there [in Israel] so we can be slaughtered and converted and bring on the second coming of Jesus Christ. The worst possible allies for the Jewish state are the fundamentalist Christians who want Jews to die and convert so they can bring on the second coming of their Lord. It is a false friendship. They are seeking their own ends and not ours. I don’t believe the fundamentalists urging a greater Israel are friends of the Jewish state.&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>You might ask, What was Mark Alan Siegel talking about? Pastor Jack Hibbs of Calvary Chapel Chino Hills, California, stated that according to the Bible, Israel is a “prerequisite” for the End Times based on Zechariah 13:7-9 and other verses. What is that “prerequisite”? Here are some examples from those who also share Hibbs’s beliefs.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>• On the September 18, 1991, edition of the “700 Club,” Sid Roth, once the host of “Messianic Vision,” stated that “two-thirds of the Jewish people [living in Israel] will be exterminated” during a future Great Tribulation. He based this view on Zechariah 13:8-9.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>• Hal Lindsey described the judgment against Israel in AD 70 as a “picnic” compared to a super-holocaust that will lead to the slaughter of two-thirds of the Jews living in Israel.&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>• Kay Arthur, another dispensational author, has stated publicly that what lies ahead for Israel will make Hitler’s Holocaust look like “a Sunday school picnic.” In her novel, &lt;em>Israel My Beloved&lt;/em>, the heroine is standing before a future scene where the Valley of Jehoshaphat is littered with the dead based on her understanding of Zechariah 13:8-9 that only a third of Israel will survive “the fire just as Zechariah promised” during the future Great Tribulation will Israel is the target of God’s wrath: “Auschwitz was nothing compared to this&amp;hellip;. I’ve watched as men, women, and children writhe in agony—an agony beyond the Crusades, the Inquisitions, the pogroms. Beyond the horrors of Sobibor, Treblinka, Auschwitz—all the death camps combined&amp;hellip;. We have experienced an agony beyond any horror the human mind can envision . . . beyond even Hitler.”&lt;strong>[2]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>• Let’s not forget Jack Van Impe’s book &lt;em>Israel’s Final Holocaust&lt;/em> where he wrote that when the prophecy clock starts ticking again after the “rapture,” it “will be traumatic days for Israel. Just when peace seems to have come, it will be taken from her and she will be plunged into another bloody persecution, &amp;hellip; a devastating explosion of persecution and misery for Israel&amp;hellip;.”&lt;strong>[3]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>• Consider what Thomas Ice wrote in his article “What do you do with a future National Israel in the Bible,” an article that no longer seems to be available: “The Bible also indicates that before Israel enters into her time of national blessing she must first pass through the fire of the tribulation (Deut. 4:30; Jer. 30:5-9; Dan. 12:1; Zeph. 1:14-18). Even though the horrors of the Holocaust under Hitler were of an unimaginable magnitude, the Bible teaches that a time of even greater trial awaits Israel during the tribulation. Anti-Semitism will reach new heights, this time global in scope, in which two-thirds of world Jewry will be killed (Zech. 13:7-9; Rev. 12). Through this time God will protect His remnant so that before His second advent &amp;lsquo;all Israel will be saved&amp;rsquo; (Rom. 11:36).”&lt;strong>[4]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>• Charles Ryrie wrote in his book &lt;em>The Best is Yet to Come&lt;/em> that during this post-rapture period Israel will undergo “the worst bloodbath in Jewish history.”&lt;strong>[5]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>• John Walvoord followed a similar line of argument: “Israel is destined to have a particular time of suffering which will eclipse anything that it has known in the past&amp;hellip;. [T]he people of Israel &amp;hellip; are placing themselves within the vortex of this future whirlwind which will destroy the majority of those living in the land of Palestine.”&lt;strong>[6]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>• Dr. Paige Patterson said this in a debate I had with him some years ago: “The present state of Israel is not the final form. The present state of Israel will be lost, eventually, and Israel will be run out of the land again, only to return when they accept the Messiah as Savior.”&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/files/pwfr_large.png?v=1736370066" alt="Prophecy Wars: The Biblical Battle Over the End Times">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Prophecy Wars: The Biblical Battle Over the End Times&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>There is a long history of skeptics turning to Bible prophecy to claim that Jesus was wrong about the timing of His coming at “the end of the age” (Matt. 24:3) and the signs associated with it. Noted atheist Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) is one of them and Bart Ehrman is a modern example. It’s obvious that neither Russell or Ehrman are aware of or are ignoring the mountain of scholarship that was available to them that showed that the prophecy given by Jesus was fulfilled in great detail just as He said it would be before the generation of His day passed away.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/prophecy-wars-the-biblical-battle-over-the-end-times" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>How do preterists interpret Zechariah 13:7-9? Many of them claim that the events leading up to and including the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 is the fulfillment. Unlike dispensationalists, Jesus issued a warning to leave the city and head for the mountains outside Judea (Matt. 24:16-20). It was a local judgment that where the Romans were the antagonists. It could be avoided by leaving Jerusalem. It was not a national conflagration. In Luke’s gospel, we find the following:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is near. Then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains, and those who are inside the city must leave, and those who are in the country must not enter the city; because these are days of punishment, so that all things which have been written will be fulfilled. Woe to those women who are pregnant, and to those who are nursing babies in those days; for there will be great distress upon the land, and wrath to this people; and they will fall by the edge of the sword, and will be led captive into all the nations; and Jerusalem will be trampled underfoot by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled (vv. 20-24).&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Jesus warned the people to leave, while dispensationalists get excited when Jews return to Israel, where two-thirds of them will be slaughtered. It’s a dispensational predicted inevitable “road to holocaust.”&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>[1] Hal Lindsey, &lt;em>The Road to Holocaust&lt;/em> (New York: Bantam Books, 1989), 220.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[2] Kay Arthur, &lt;em>Israel, My Beloved: A Novel&lt;/em> (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1996), 433&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[3] Jack Van Impe with Roger F. Campbell, &lt;em>Israel’s Final Holocaust&lt;/em> (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1979), 37.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[4] Thomas Ice, “The Israel of God,” &lt;em>The Thomas Ice Collection&lt;/em>. An article with the same title does not include his comment that compared to the Holocaust under Hitler, “that a time of even greater trial awaits Israel during the tribulation.” &lt;a href="https://anti-antichrist.com/featured/ice/TheIsraelOfGod.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here to read&lt;/a>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[5] Charles C. Ryrie, &lt;em>The Best is Yet to Come&lt;/em> (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1981), 86.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>[6] John Walvoord, &lt;em>Israel in Prophecy&lt;/em> (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1968), 107, 113. Also quoted in Timothy P. Weber, &lt;em>On the Road to Armageddon: How Evangelicals Became Israel’s Best Friend&lt;/em> (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004), 149.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>A Thousand Years Like a Day</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/a-thousand-years-like-a-day/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 07:47:35 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/a-thousand-years-like-a-day/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>Gary &lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/a-thousand-years-like-a-day-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">responds&lt;/a> to an interview with author Jerry Jenkins of Left Behind fame.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>“But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day” (2 Pet. 3:8). This means, it is said, that “God’s arithmetic is different from ours,” so that when Scripture uses terms like “near” and “shortly” (e.g., Rev. 1:1, 3) or “at hand” (e.g., James 5:5–7), it doesn’t intend to give the impression of soon-approaching events, but of events possibly thousands of years in the future! Milton Terry refuted this seemingly plausible but spurious theory:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>The language is a poetical citation from Psalm 90:4, and is adduced to show that the lapse of time does not invalidate the promises of God. . . . But this is very different from saying that when the everlasting God promises something &lt;em>shortly&lt;/em>, and declares that it is &lt;em>close at hand&lt;/em>, He may mean that it is a thousand years in the future. Whatever He has promised indefinitely He may take a thousand years or more to fulfill; but what He affirms to be at the door let no man declare to be far away.&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>St. Peter’s encouragement to the Church of his day was to be patient, to wait for God’s judgment to destroy those who were persecuting the faith and impeding its progress. “The end of all things is at hand,” he had written earlier (1 Pet. 4:7). John Brown commented:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>“The end of all things” here is the entire end of the Jewish economy in the destruction of the temple and city of Jerusalem, and the dispersal of the holy people. That was at hand; for this epistle seems to have been written a very short while before these events took place. . . . It is quite plain that in our Lord’s predictions, the expressions “the end” and probably “the end of the world” are used in reference to the entire dissolution of the Jewish economy (cf. Matt. 24:3, 6, 14, 34; Rom. 13:11–12; James 5:8–9).&lt;strong>[2]&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>Once the Lord came to destroy the scaffolding of the Old Covenant structure, the New Covenant Temple would be left in its place, and the victorious march of the Church would be unstoppable. According to God’s predestined design, the world will be converted; the earth’s treasures will be brought into the City of God, as the Paradise Mandate (Gen. 1:27–28; Matt. 28:18–20) is consummated (Rev. 21:1–27).&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0220/1508/products/LDM-front_large.png?v=1572279906" alt="Last Days Madness">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>Last Days Madness&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>In this authoritative book, Gary DeMar clears the haze of ‘end-times’ fever, shedding light on the most difficult and studied prophetic passages in the Bible, including Daniel 7:13-14; 9:24-27; Matt. 16:27-28; 24-25; Thess. 2; 2 Peter 3:3-13, and clearly explaining a host of other controversial topics.&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/last-days-madness" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Gary responds to an interview with author Jerry Jenkins of Left Behind fame. Jenkins claims that the Bible tells us that time means something different to God than it means to us, yet he still makes the claim that the end times are &amp;ldquo;probably soon&amp;rdquo; to happen.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/a-thousand-years-like-a-day-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here to browse all episodes of The Gary DeMar Podcast&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;hr>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>[1]&lt;/strong> Milton S. Terry, &lt;em>Biblical Hermeneutics: A Treatise on the Interpretation of the Old and New Testaments&lt;/em> (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1974), 406.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>[2]&lt;/strong> Quoted in Roderick Campbell, &lt;em>Israel and the New Covenant&lt;/em> (Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian and Reformed, [1954] 2010), 107.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Episode 85: How Ezekiel 38 Debunks Futurism</title><link>https://americanvision.org/posts/episode-85-how-ezekiel-38-debunks-futurism/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:23:26 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://americanvision.org/posts/episode-85-how-ezekiel-38-debunks-futurism/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;strong>Bible Prophecy Under the Microscope-Episode 85&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Gary &lt;a href="https://youtu.be/G1YgFic_Nks" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">responds&lt;/a> to a recent video from Joel Richardson where he claims to refute preterism.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Eschatological ideas have consequences, and many Christians are beginning to understand how those ideas have shaped the cultural landscape. A world always on the precipice of some great and inevitable apocalyptic event is not in need of redemption but only of escape. As one end-time speculator put it, “the world is a sinking Titanic ripe for judgment.” Any attempt at reformation would be futile and contrary to God’s unavoidable and predestined plan for Armageddon.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Thankfully, many Christians are beginning to question this popular apocalyptic scenario, not by rejecting the Bible but by taking a closer look at the very Book they were told taught these things. In addition, they have come to recognize that Western Civilization was not built by head-for-the-hills doomsayers. Unfortunately, the effects of the apocalyptic paradigm are having some unsettling results in the realm of real-world politics. Some are contending that mixing eschatology and politics could lead to some terrifying results. The ultimate question is whether the Bible teaches what popular prophecy writers claim. This can only be settled by following the directive of the Latin phrase &lt;em>ad fontes&lt;/em>, “to the sources,” that is, to the Bible (Acts 17:11).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>As history shows, “wars and rumors of wars” (Matt. 24:6) are common, and they have been pointed to as signs that the end was near in nearly every generation. In fact, they are so common, Jesus maintained, that they should not be used as signs. The same is true for earthquakes and famines (24:7) since every generation has experienced them (Matt. 27:54; 28:2; Acts 11:28; 16:26).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>None of this has stopped prophetic speculators from claiming that prophecy is now being fulfilled. They point to Ezekiel 38–39 and Zechariah 12 to make the case that there is something prophetically unique about our day. They can do this because they claim to have found a find a very specific nation mentioned by the prophet Ezekiel—Russia! Who needs the commonality of wars, earthquakes, and famines when there is a named nation right there in the Bible. &lt;em>The Gog and Magog End-Time Alliance&lt;/em> will test the claim that the Bible is describing prophetic events based on what Russia does.&lt;/p>
&lt;div class="product_card">
&lt;div class="product_image">
&lt;img src="https://store.americanvision.org/cdn/shop/products/gog_front_large.jpg?v=1453287902" alt="The Gog and Magog End-Time Alliance">
&lt;/div>
&lt;div class="product_info">
&lt;h3>The Gog and Magog End-Time Alliance&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Jet planes … missiles … and atomic weapons. You will search in vain in Ezekiel 38 and 39, and you will not find them. You will, however, find horses, bows and arrows, shields, clubs, and chariots. If the Gog and Magog prophecy was written for a time more than 2500 years in the future from Ezekiel’s day, why didn’t God describe the battle in terms that we could relate to and understand? Why confuse Ezekiel’s first readers and us?&lt;/p>
&lt;a class="button" href="https://store.americanvision.org/products/the-gog-and-magog-end-time-alliance-israel-russia-and-syria-in-bible-prophecy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Buy Now&lt;/a>
&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>
&lt;p>Gary responds to a recent video from Joel Richardson where he claims to refute preterism. Richardson mentions Gary directly and gives false information about what he believes. Besides that, Richardson&amp;rsquo;s primary claim to refute preterism actually ends up doing the exact opposite when understood in context.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://garydemar.libsyn.com/how-ezekiel-38-debunks-futurism" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for today’s episode&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://youtu.be/G1YgFic_Nks" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Watch the video here&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://americanvision.org/categories/microscope/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external">Click here for all episodes of Bible Prophecy Under the Microscope&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>