A good friend of mine sent me an L.A. Times op-ed piece on why California really should legalize marijuana in the upcoming November ballot.  I like how the author, Hanna Liebman Dershowitz, focuses on the issue of Federal involvement versus states rights and how it would only require an simple amendment to the Controlled Substances Act and not a constitutional amendment.

I’ll post some highlights below but highly recommend an entire read through.  It’s not that long.

The federal-state dynamic concerning marijuana is not complicated. Under our system of federalism, both the states and the feds may prohibit commerce in marijuana, but neither is required to do so. Similarly, during alcohol prohibition (1920-33), commerce in alcoholic beverages was prohibited not only by federal law (the Volstead Act) but by the laws of most states. In 1923, New York repealed its state prohibition laws, leaving enforcement, for the remaining 10 years, entirely to the feds. California voters overwhelmingly did the same thing in 1932, one year before national prohibition was repealed.

The second ball is even more significant. Voter approval of Proposition 19 would shift to the feds the responsibility and burden of justifying marijuana prohibition in the first place. Now, the Washingtonians who have never questioned decades of anti-pot propaganda can explain to the people of California why we cannot be trusted to determine our state’s marijuana policies. Let them endorse the prohibition laws’ usefulness as a tool of oppressing minorities. Let them celebrate how minor marijuana violations cost people their jobs, their housing, custody of their kids, and entrap them permanently in vast criminal justice databases. Let them justify the utter hypocrisy of the legal treatment of alcohol and tobacco, as compared with the illegal treatment of marijuana. Let them tell us how many more people will have to be prosecuted and punished before marijuana is eradicated, how much that will cost, and where the money will come from.

Proposition 19′s success in November would put the feds in a quandary, yes, but it is a quandary of their own making. Unlike alcohol prohibition, which required a constitutional amendment, Congress could fix this easily with a simple amendment to the Controlled Substances Act allowing conduct legal under state law and respecting the right of states to regulate and tax the cannabis industry. After all, determining what is a crime is traditionally handled at the state level; indeed, federal prosecutions of drug possession make up a miniscule portion of overall drug arrests.

Additional Links

• California Voters Support Legalizing the Sale of Marijuana (yubanet.com)
• Black Community Split Over Legalizing Marijuana (npr.org)
• Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s Wrong-Headed Opposition to Marijuana Legalization (alternet.org)
• Dianne Feinstein Opposes Marijuana Legalization In California (huffingtonpost.com)
• Drug Czar Warns of “Black Market” for Marijuana (elections.firedoglake.com)

Post from: T.R. Wolfe's Allspace in a Notshall

Why California Should Legalize Marijuana (L.A. Times)

I’m not lying, read it here at Huffington Post:

Republicans in the House of Representatives have introduced a measure that would green-light an Israeli bombing campaign against Iran. The resolution, H.Res. 1553 (in full below), provides explicit support for military strikes against Iran, stating that Congress supports Israel’s use of “all means necessary” against Iran “including the use of military force”. US military leaders have warned that strikes could be catastrophic to US national security interests and could engulf the Middle East in a “calamitous” regional war.

Hawkish former Bush Administration official John Bolton recently laid out the game plan to prod Israel into attacking Iran, arguing that outsiders can “create broad support” for a strike by framing it as an issue of Israel’s right to self defense. Supporters for military strikes, Bolton says, should “defend the specific tactic of pre-emptive attacks” against Iran. He urges that Congress can “make it clear” that it supports such strikes and that “having visible congressional support in place at the outset will reassure the Israeli government, which is legitimately concerned about Mr. Obama’s likely negative reaction to such an attack.”

Simulations have been conducted over the past year to assess the outcome of a preemptive military strike against Iran. One such simulation, by the Brookings Institution’s Saban Center, found that strikes would draw the US into the conflict that would engulf the region into war, and would enable Iran to use the attacks as an opportunity to unite the Iranian people and dismantle its opposition. The simulation also found that the strikes could not destroy Iran’s nuclear program but merely set it back a few years.

So we aren’t “winning” in Iraq and Afghanistan and yet we want to open up a third offensive front in Iran? Why not attack North Korea too?

According to Juan Cole, here’s what would happen if Israel was to strike Iran:

1. Iran will use Shiite operatives and militiamen to kill the increasingly vulnerable remaining US troops in Iraq (once there are less than 50,000 non-combat troops in that country, they are not troops, they are hostages).
2. Iran will stir up its substantial number of clients in Afghanistan to hit the United States, widening the insurgency from mainly Pashtun Taliban to include fundamentalist Tajiks and Hazaras. The US will remain mired in that war, perhaps for decades, as a result.
3. Iran will probably bide its time and act in covert and hard to trace ways against US interests in the region. There could be more operations like the Khobar Towers bombing of US troops in Saudi Arabia or the 1983 attack on a Marine barracks in Beirut. All US commercial and government offices in the region would become targets.
4. A fair likelihood exists that Hizbullah would do something to Israel in revenge, possibly provoking another Israel-Lebanon War. The last war did not go well for Israel, despite its massive military superiority. A fourth of Israelis were forced to move house, chemical gas facilities in Haifa were threatened (and the Dimona Nuclear plant that makes all those Israeli nuclear warheads could be), and Hizbullah had broken Israeli radio encryption and knew all the Israeli army plans beforehand.
5. Not only would the democratically inclined opposition movement in Iran evaporate, but Muslim fundamentalists in Egypt, Jordan and other US allies would mobilize and perhaps gain in popularity out of anti-imperial solidarity. (Only 6% of ordinary Arabs is worried about an Iranian nuclear bomb, whereas almost all are disturbed by Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians).
6. The price of oil would spike, likely to 2008 highs of $140 a barrel, throwing the world back into Depression.
7. Once such hostilities began, and given these likely responses, the US could well get sucked into a third major Middle East war, against a country geographically much bigger than either Iraq or Afghanistan, and more than twice as populous as each of them. At another $1 trillion, that cost would push the US into $14 trillion in indebtedness all by itself, and since that is American annual gross domestic product, it could trigger a downgrading of American credit, making the interest servicing on existing and future loans far more expensive and, along with crippling high oil prices, beginning America’s final spiral down into poverty and weakness.

• As long as the stupid American Goyim pay for it and use up their own kids to do it, of course! (barbaradiamond.blogspot.com)
• The Brink of War (politics.ie)
• “Repubs Plot Israel-Iran Apocalypse and the Collapse of the US Economy” and related posts (juancole.com)
• Report: Israel convinces Obama to plan for Iran strike (barbaradiamond.blogspot.com)

Post from: T.R. Wolfe's Allspace in a Notshall

Republicans Want Israel to Attack Iran

Enough fat to fill nine double-decker buses is being removed from sewers under London’s Leicester Square.

A team of “flushers” equipped with full breathing apparatus has been drafted in with shovels to dig out an estimated 1,000 tonnes of putrid fat.

And powerful jets are being used to break it down.

The operation, which began in the early hours of this morning, is claimed to be the largest-ever sewer clean-up of its kind.

The build-up is the result of years of “sewer abuse” – when anything other than water, human waste and toilet paper is put down drains – according to Thames Water.

Danny Brackley, the water company’s sewer flusher, said: “We’re used to getting our hands dirty, but nothing on this scale.

“We couldn’t even access the sewer as it was blocked by a four-foot wall of solid fat.”

The clean-up is expected to last a couple of weeks.

Thames Water spends £12 million a year clearing around 55,000 sewer blockages across London and the Thames Valley.

Read the article and see a picture here.

You’re welcome.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Fat cleared from London sewers will fill nine double-decker buses (telegraph.co.uk)
• My Breakfast, It’s Coming Back Up: Four Feet Of ‘Fat’ Scraped From London Sewer Walls (geekologie.com)
• Workers Remove Walls of Solid Fat from London Sewers (towleroad.com)
• “Fatbergs” in Sewers Underneath London (neatorama.com)

Post from: T.R. Wolfe's Allspace in a Notshall

Disgusting: Walls of Fat in London Sewers

Easily one of my favorite artists currently making music today, Venetian Snares, is set to release his next studio album on August 23rd.  It’ll be called “My So-Called Life” and comes in the standard CD, Vinyl and MP3 releases.  It will also be the first release on Aaron Funk’s new sublabel, Timesig.

Here is the release off the official page:

“My So-Called Life” is the first release on my brand new record label Timesig. The majority of these tracks were made quite quickly, in a day or 2 each. These are the ones I feel closest to, I can listen to one of these 10 tracks and remember that day exactly, all that I was feeling, just where my head was at, whether it was a good memory, a laugh, something that was bugging me or something bumming me out. Listening brings me back to that day, whereas hearing some of my other albums brings me back to some period in my life in general. I was explaining to a friend the other day, it was more like a collection of short stories than a novel for me. Diary entries he said, and they really are, pockets of inspiration realized within a day. For me it is remote viewing my own memories with clearer and clearer mind binoculars. All important pieces in my puzzle, this kind of filing system I have that sits outside my cognitive filing yet is clear in this system. Of course all of this probably means nothing to you but you have to write something in these things so when you send out promos nobody has to think of anything thoughtful to say about it themselves. Usually I write a bunch of preposterous shit to poke fun at that whole process but I didn’t feel like that today. Maybe tomorrow I will.

You can view the official release page at Planet Mu’s website here.  Cannot wait, especially for Hajnal2!

Post from: T.R. Wolfe's Allspace in a Notshall

New Venetian Snares Album in August

A process called coherence allows photon energy to find the shortest path through a leaf’s surface by taking all possible paths simultaneously, then “picking” the best one. The resulting energy transfer is almost perfectly efficient.

Researchers hope these findings will guide the design of solar panels that are as efficient as nature’s, said Harel. In the meantime, scientists will continue looking for more evidence of quantum biology, which has been also been posited in the structure of DNA and operations of the mind.

Related articles:

• Diamonds and the holy grail of quantum computing (sciencedaily.com)
• Build a better quantum computer with diamond nanocrystals [Quantum Computing] (io9.com)
• The proton shrinks in size (nature.com)
• The incredible shrinking proton (sciencenews.org)
• DK Matai: What is The Quantum God Effect? ‘I am You, You are Me’ (huffingtonpost.com)

Post from: T.R. Wolfe's Allspace in a Notshall

Quantum Physics in Your Potted Plants

Found this interesting article on Reality Sandwich today talking about Terence McKenna and his lectures on his DMT trips.  It’s a fascinating read, but due to some of the author’s conclusions, I’ll have to read the article a few more times.

Here’s a controversial excerpt, bolds are mine:

I find Terence’s reflections on his DMT experiences to be valuable and insightful for a very different reason. When analyzed from the perspective of what I call the “Entheological Paradigm,” Terence’s experiences do not present us with an intrepid explorer discovering new realms. Rather, we are presented with a clear picture of an individual who is unable to recognize himself in the mirror of tryptamine consciousness. In short, Terence’s experiences boil down to one fundamental truth: They are the experiences of someone who is consuming very powerful entheogens, yet is failing to recognize the projections and creations of his own ego while in that state. From the perspective of unitary consciousness, Terence appears to have never managed to transcend his ego and therefore appears to have failed to realize the genuinely true potential of the entheogenic medicines he ingested.

When this perspective is understood, it becomes immediately clear that virtually all of what Terence has to say about DMT experiences are projections of his own ego. Terence has not explored some other realm or brought back valuable information for other would-be explorers, as he imagined himself doing. Instead, he explored the confused projections of his own ego and never achieved anything close to clarity about those experiences. Ultimately, Terence brought us deep and abiding confusion, and his confusion has subsequently been eagerly and whole-heartedly embraced by countless others in the entheogenic community. For the information that Terence brought back to us to be of any real use at all, it will be as a clear example of the mechanics of ego-projection, self-imposed confusion and reification of ideational realities. In my estimation, Terence shows us the complete opposite of DMT’s true potential. By understanding how this is so, we can begin to develop a clearer picture of what DMT is genuinely good for, and what it is not.

It’s actually a rather scathing view on McKenna, but I will say that it’s nice to see the flip side of opinions on McKenna. Personally, I’m a huge fan of his and have collected and listened to, multiple times, any and all video and audio materials I could get my hands on. But I also like to think that I’m open-minded enough to see how other people might not view what he had to say in the same light that I do.

Anyway, give it a read, especially if you’re a fan…

Post from: T.R. Wolfe's Allspace in a Notshall

Analyzing Terence McKenna’s DMT Talks

Found this on Disinfo via the Daily Mail today:

Americans who suggest Barack Obama should rot in hell are apparently deadly serious.

Nearly a quarter of Republicans believe the Democrat president ‘may be the Antichrist‘, according to a survey.

An even greater number compared him to Hitler.

More than half of the Republicans quizzed by Harris Poll, 57 per cent, believed the president was secretly Muslim, something he has consistently denied.

And 67 per cent of Republicans who responded believed Obama was a socialist, despite his central leanings.

The startling results came as lawyers representing 14 U.S. states filed lawsuits yesterday challenging an overhaul of the country’s $2.5trillion healthcare system, minutes after President Barack Obama signed the landmark legislation.

These people need to leave government service as quickly as possible. And I’m not talking about a nice retirement here either…

Related articles by Zemanta

• Quarter of Republicans think Barack Obama is ‘the Antichrist’ (telegraph.co.uk)
• AntiChristers: Nearly 25% of GOP Say Obama May be the AntiChrist (grantlawrence.blogspot.com)

Post from: T.R. Wolfe's Allspace in a Notshall

Quarter of Republicans think Obama is the Anti-Christ

This is a huge step in the legalization campaign.  According to the LA Times,

An initiative to legalize marijuana and allow it to be sold and taxed will appear on the November ballot, state election officials announced Wednesday, triggering what will probably be a much-watched campaign that once again puts California on the forefront of the nation’s debate over whether to soften drug laws.

Continue reading the article here.

If this were to happen, what kind of ramifications does this have nationwide?   And how would it conflict with Federal drug policy?  Do you think it would force the Federal government to change it’s own laws?  It could get very interesting at the end of this year.   Hopefully Colorado follows suit.

Related articles by Zemanta

• California Puts Pot Legalization on November Ballot (patspapers.com)
• California Voters To Decide On Legalizing Pot (alan.com)
• Calif. voters to decide whether to legalize pot (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Calif. Voters to Decide Whether to Legalize Pot (abcnews.go.com)
• California Pot Legalization May Happen In November Election (huffingtonpost.com)

Post from: T.R. Wolfe's Allspace in a Notshall

Legalization of Marijuana will be on California’s November Ballot

Interesting article I found on NPR today.  It talks about how porn maestros have played a very influential role in the development of the Internet and its technologies.  Quotes below:

Think back to the early days of the Internet, Coopersmith says. “You had to have the hookup, you had to have the computer, you had to have the willingness to experiment a fair amount. And the people who do this tend to be young men, especially in their 20s and 30s, and this also happens to be a prime audience for pornography.”

Of course, that’s only taking into account pornographic Web sites — the Internet has also provided a private venue for sexual discussion and education. Violet Blue is a sex columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle, writes for several online publications, and blogs and hosts a popular podcast called “Open Source Sex.”

“The Internet has been sexualized even before it was the Internet,” she says. Back in the days of bulletin board systems, some people would exchange what was known as “ASCII porn.”

Video technology is a place where adult sites have been especially innovative, integrating live video streams into browser windows with early “jpeg push” video. They continue to be on the cutting edge; Peter Acworth, who founded the very NSFW site kink.com, remembers a few years ago when customers were demanding live HD streams, but he couldn’t find an acceptable off-the-shelf solution.

“So we put together our own technology to be able to do so,” Acworth says. “You know, you go to CNN or anywhere else on the Web, the video you see is going to be significantly lower bandwidth.”

Very interesting read. Check it out.

Post from: T.R. Wolfe's Allspace in a Notshall

You Can Thank Porn for da Internet

March 11, 2010

WASHINGTON, DC — With numerous states facing significant budget shortages, legislators and voters across the country this month have been giving overwhelming support to measures that would reduce the penalty for possession of small amounts of marijuana to a civil fine.

Yesterday in New Hampshire, the state House voted 214-137 to pass H.B. 1653, a bill that would reduce the penalty for possession of up to a quarter-ounce of marijuana with a civil fine of up to $200.

In Hawaii, the state Senate voted 22 to 3 on March 2 to pass SB 2450, a bill that would eliminate criminal penalties for the possession of up to one ounce of marijuana and replace them with a civil fine of up to $300 for a first offense and $500 for a subsequent offense.

And in Vermont, 72% of voters in Montpelier approved a non-binding ordinance asking the state legislature “to pass a bill to replace criminal penalties with a civil fine for adults who possess a small amount of marijuana.”

“Taken together, these developments demonstrate how an increasing number of voters and lawmakers across the country no longer support the notion that otherwise law-abiding citizens should be arrested, slapped with a criminal record and possibly thrown behind bars, simply for choosing to use a substance that is safer than alcohol,” said Karen O’Keefe, director of state policies for the Marijuana Policy Project. “We know from efforts in other states that decriminalizing the possession of small amounts of marijuana allows police to focus on more serious crimes and also produces a net financial gain through saved law-enforcement costs and the revenue generated by civil fines. Lawmakers everywhere should take heed of these examples, especially in these troubled economic times.”

Currently 12 states have laws that reduce the penalties for possession of small amounts of marijuana to a civil fine. A decriminalization bill in Rhode Island is co-sponsored by 48% of House members.

Related articles by Zemanta

• On the Decriminalization of Pot: But Will it Really Save Money? (blogs.wsj.com)
• Religious Marijuana Smoking Still Illegal: Judge (huffingtonpost.com)
• Marijuana advocates want changes in WA drug laws (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Wash. activists file initiative to legalize pot (sfgate.com)

Post from: T.R. Wolfe's Allspace in a Notshall

A Blessing in Disguise: Budget Short Falls Leading to Marijuana Legalization/Decriminalization?